Explore
Communities in English
Advertise on Engormix

The “ideal protein” concept is not ideal in animal nutrition

Published: August 22, 2022
By: Guoyao Wu 1 and Peng Li 2 / 1 Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA; 2 North American Renderers Association, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA.
Introduction
Amino acids (AAs) are natural substances containing both amino and acid groups. Proline, which contains an imino group but not an amino group, is loosely considered as an AA in nutrition and metabolism.1 Protein (the polymer of AAs) is the major component of growth in animals and has been a focus of nutritional research over the past century.2 Proteinogenic (protein-creating) in animals are alanine, arginine, asparagine, asparate, cysteine, glutamate, glutamine, glycine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, proline, serine, threonine, tryptophan, tyrosine, and valine. Selenocysteine that occurs in selenoproteins is formed from selenium and serine during the process of mRNA translation. AAs that are not precursors of proteins are called non-proteinogenic AAs, and some of them (e.g. taurine) fulfill essential physiological functions, but are either not synthesized by certain animals (e.g. cats) or inadequately synthesized in many species of fish.3 Note that animals have no requirements for pure nitrogen.2
Structural support and function of animals require collagens, which account for one-third of all proteins in the body. About 31% of proline residues in collagens undergo post-translational modification to 4-hydroxyproline and 3-hydroxyproline.4 The content of hydroxyprolines in animals increases with age until reaching sexual maturity, but the composition of all proteinogenic AAs is largely similar among different species of growing animals (Table 1), with exceptions for certain AAs (e.g. glycine and arginine) in some fish (e.g. largemouth bass and hybrid-striped bass)3 and shrimp,4 as well as glycine, cysteine, and methionine in rabbits.5 Like taurine, 4-hydroxyproline is a potent antioxidant and a scavenger of free radical species to protect the intestine and other tissues from oxidative damage.6,7 4-Hydroxyproline is a major substrate for glycine synthesis in tissues (e.g. the kidneys, liver, small intestine, and skeletal muscle) of animals.7 Of note, glycine, proline, and glutamate are the first, second, and third most abundant AAs, respectively, in the body. The intracellular synthesis of protein requires the simultaneous presence of all proteinogenic AAs in adequate amounts and proper ratios and, therefore, is limited by a deficiency of any proteinogenic AAs (including those that are synthesized de novo) at any given time.2 In other words, all proteinogenic AAs are physiologically and nutritionally (as shown below) essential for protein synthesis, growth, development, and health in animals, such as pigs, poultry, and fish. This article highlights the historical development of and recent revisions to the long-standing concept of “ideal protein” in the nutrition of the farm animals. Because they are not only species of agricultural importance, but also useful models to study the biology and diseases of humans and extinct animals in the world,8–10 our work applies to a more general readership than the nutritionists and producers of farm animals. In this article, proteinogenic AAs, except for glycine, refer to their l-isomers, unless specifically indicated.
The “ideal protein” concept is not ideal in animal nutrition - Image 1
Values are mg amino acid/g protein.
a Unless indicated otherwise, calculations were based on the molecular weights of intact AAs.
b Adult rats (60day-old in the postabsorptive state) without intestinal lumen contents.11
c Data for human fetuses (days 160–280 of gestation) and cattle (12-week old) were obtained from Davis et al.12 It was not reported whether calculations were based on the molecular weights of intact AAs or AA residues.
d Adult sheep (12-month old) without intestinal lumen contents.11
e Chickens (10-day old chickens in the postabsorptive state) without intestinal lumen contents.11
f Pigs (30-day old in the postabsorptive state) without intestinal lumen contents.11
g Fifty-three-day-old New Zealand White rabbits (males and females).5
h Juvenile hybrid-striped bass (HSB; 50g of body weight) without intestinal lumen contents.3
i Juvenile largemouth bass (LMB; 50g of body weight) without intestinal lumen contents.3
j Whole body of the whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei; 15g of body weight) without intestinal lumen contents.13
Concepts of nutritionally essential AAs and nonessential AAs
Animal cells cannot synthesize the carbon skeletons of the following 11 proteinogenic AAs de novo: cysteine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, tryptophan, tyrosine, and valine.2 Therefore, they have been classified as nutritionally essential AAs (EAAs) and must be included in diets for maintenance, growth, development, and survival in all nonruminants. By contrast, animal cells can synthesize the carbon skeletons of the following eight proteinogenic AAs de novo: alanine, asparagine, aspartate, glutamate, glutamine, glycine, proline, and serine, and their nitrogen is derived primarily from EAAs.2 Whether arginine synthesis occurs de novo depends on animal species (see below). Dietary non-AA nitrogen (e.g. 2% urea or ammonia) is effectively used for AA and protein synthesis by ruminal microbes in ruminants.14–16
Growing nonruminant mammals (e.g. pigs and rats) can utilize a small amount of dietary ammonia-nitrogen for AASA synthesis when diets are severely deficient in AASAs. For example, nitrogen in the form of diammonium citrate (providing 1.45 and 2.9% crude protein [CP]) added to soybean meal- and cornstarch-based diets containing a low-CP level (only 10.19%) can be used for AASA synthesis in a dose-dependent manner by growing pigs (15–27kg body weight).17 Similarly, 2.15% diammonium citrate added to a purified diet containing 8% EAAs (low-AA level) enhanced the growth of young rats during weeks 0–4 postweaning.18 Similarly, young chicks can use dietary diammonium citrate (1.51 and 3.02%) for enhancing weight gain in a dose-dependent manner when fed purified diets containing low (10%) total AAs.19 Interestingly, under this feeding condition, adding 0.8% urea to the low-AA diets also improved the growth of chicks,19 likely due to the synthesis of AAs by intestinal microbes, but dietary supplementation with 1.5% urea had no further effect.19 Note that (1) animal cells lack urease, but the intestinal microbes of pigs and rats contain urease to hydrolyze urea into ammonia plus CO22 and (2) in all the previous studies involving low-CP or low-AA diets supplemented with a non-AA nitrogen source, young nonruminant animals had suboptimum growth rates.17–22
In contrast to ruminants, neither pigs20 nor rats21 can use dietary urea for a nutritionally significant synthesis of AAs or tissue growth. Indeed, adding 2% urea to wheat- and fishmeal-based diets (22% CP) for growing pigs (4–11 weeks of age) reduced their daily feed consumption, weight gain, and feed efficiency,20 possibly due to the toxicity of ammonia produced from the ingested urea by intestinal microbes. Likewise, adding 1% urea or 2.2% diammonium hydrogen phosphate to the basal starter diet (containing 20.6% CP; nearly adequate diet) of broiler chickens (0–4 weeks of age) depressed their growth and feed conversion as compared with the control diet (23.5% CP), whereas adding 0.5% urea and 1.1% diammonium hydrogen phosphate to the basal finisher diet (containing 18% CP; nearly adequate diet) of broiler chickens (4–7 weeks of age) did not affect their weight gain or feed conversion efficiency in comparison with the control diet (20% CP).22
The AAs that are synthesizable de novo in animals (AASAs) have been termed nutritionally nonessential amino acids (NEAAs) since the early 1910s,23 and they were thought to be sufficiently formed in animals and dispensable in their diets. However, this view has not been substantiated by experimental results from animal studies over the past 110 years.24–26 De novo synthesis of arginine in animals depends on their species, as this metabolic pathway exists in most mammals (including pigs, cattle, sheep, rats, and many breeds of dogs), is limited in cats, and is absent in some mammals (e.g. ferrets and minks), birds, and possibly many species of fish.27 It should be borne in mind that NEAAs and EAAs account for 60 and 40% of total AAs in animals, respectively.28 This indicates a greater requirement of animals for NEAAs than EAAs for protein synthesis in tissues. However, such a fundamental knowledge hadnot received much attention from nutritionists until recent years.3,11,13,26,29–31 The traditional view that animals have no dietary requirements for NEAAs must be refuted in light of the new knowledge of AA biochemistry, nutrition and physiology. The term “NEAAs” has now been recognized as a misnomer in nutritional science30 and, therefore, should be replaced by AAs that are synthesizable de novo in animal cells (AASAs).
Historical development of the “ideal protein” concept in chicken nutrition
The concept of “ideal protein” (a protein with an optimal EAA pattern that precisely meets the physiological needs of animals) in nutrition was initially proposed in the late 1950s by poultry nutritionists at the University of Illinois for chicken diets.32,33 Guided by the textbook view of the time that animals sufficiently synthesized de novo all AASAs, the conceptualization of an “ideal protein” concerned arginine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, tryptophan, and valine, but not AASAs.33 The early researchers used the composition of EAAs in both casein and chicken eggs as the experimental basis to formulate purified diets for young chicks, but were largely unsuccessful for weight gain and feed efficiency partly because of the imbalances and excessive amounts of many EAAs. In 1960, based on EAA profiles in the chick carcass, Klain et al.34 revised the dietary content of AAs with the following crystalline AAs (% of diet) to feed 7-day-old male broilers for 5–7 days: arginine–HCl, 1.40; histidine–HCl, 0.51; lysine–HCl, 1.54; tyrosine, 0.80; tryptophan, 0.18; phenylalanine, 1.18; cystine, 0.40; dl-methionine, 0.20; dl-threonine, 1.16; leucine, 1.66; dl-isoleucine, 1.68; dlvaline, 1.92; glycine, 0.50; and glutamic acid (the sole source of nonspecific nitrogen), 15.00. The authors observed that the daily weight gain of the chicks was enhanced with the revised “ideal protein,” but remained largely unsatisfactory for maximum growth rate and feed efficiency.34 Note that the content of total EAAs in chicks and other animals is much lower than that of total AASAs (Table 1).5,11,12
During the late 1960s and the early 1970s, Baker et al.35,36 included proline along with cystine, glycine, and glutamic acid in purified diets for broilers, which led to an improvement in their growth performance. In birds, as in mammals, cysteine is generated from methionine in hepatocytes; glycine from serine, threonine, and choline; proline from arginine; and glutamate from glutamine and ammonia plus α-ketoglutarate in a cell- and tissue-specific manner.37,38 In those and the earlier studies, glutamic acid was used to provided nonspecific AA nitrogen, but was not considered to be required in poultry diets. These findings led to sequentially three versions of the “chick AA requirement standard” for 1- to 21-day-old broilers.39–41 In 1994, Baker and Han42 revised the reference values for EAAs in the diets of broilers to further improve their feed efficiency (Table 2). Note that all the proposed versions of the “ideal protein” for chick diets33–36,39–42 did not contain alanine, aspartate, asparagine, glutamine, or serine; differed substantially for glycine and proline and, to a lesser extent, for branched-chain AAs, histidine, and sulfur-containing AAs (Table 2); and were arbitrarily set to contain only a relatively small amount of proline and glycine. This is likely due to significant variations in the reported AA composition of the chicken body43,44 and the lack of crucial information on the content of many abundant AASAs (including proline plus 4-hydroxyproline, glutamate, glutamine, aspartate, and asparagine) in chicks during the 1950s–the 1990s.
The “ideal protein” concept is not ideal in animal nutrition - Image 2
a These ideal protein models were developed for 0–21-day-old broilers using crystalline amino acids. It was assumed that all of these amino acids were 100% available for absorption into enterocytes in chicks. Except for glycine and methionine, all amino acids are l-isomers. dl-methionine is used herein.
b Average values for 1-week-old and 4–5-week-old chicks.
c % of diet (as-fed basis; 90% dry matter).
d Provided as the nitrogenous source for synthesis of all NEAA in chicks.
†This value refers to l-methionine.
It is noteworthy that the dietary content of glutamic acid in the previous studies (e.g. 13 times that of lysine)41 to provide chicks with “nonspecific AA nitrogen” is particularly high. Glutamate shares the same transporters with aspartate, cysteine, and cystine in animal cells, and also actively participates in the metabolism of many AAs (including branchedchain AAs, glutamine, and proline).2 Thus, there is concern that a great excess of glutamic acid in diets may result in AA and acid–base imbalances, as well as abnormalities in transmembrane AA transport, interorgan AA metabolism, and neurological function in chickens. Such an issue was not addressed in all the studies of the University of Illinois researchers.33–36,39–42 Possibly due to the forementioned concern and the 1994 publication of the ninth revised edition of Nutrient Requirements of Poultry by National Research Council (NRC) of the United States,45 glutamic acid, glycine, and proline were excluded in 1997 by Baker46 from the final version of the “ideal protein” for the diets of 0–56-day-old broiler chickens (Table 3). This decision might have resulted from an insufficient understanding of avian AA metabolism before the 2000s. Sufficient dietary supply of glutamate, glycine, and proline is crucial for maximum growth and production performance in poultry, including chickens.13,26
Historical development of the “ideal protein” concept in swine nutrition
Like chickens, pigs are monogastric animals. Thus, the previous extensive research on developing the “ideal protein” for poultry diets provided useful framework for swine studies in the 1980s and 1990s. In 1980, by simulating AA composition in the carcass of growing pigs, Cole48 proposed “optimum” dietary ratios of EAAs (relative to lysine) for their feeding. This concept was accepted in the subsequent year by the Agricultural Research Council (ARC) of the United Kingdom49 and in 1988 by the NRC.50 However, the ARC’s version of the “ideal protein” for swine did not include two EAAs (histidine and arginine) and all AASAs (Table 4). The absence of histidine from the conceptualized “ideal protein” in swine diets lacked a sound biochemical and physiological basis because this AA is an essential constituent of all proteins but is not synthesized de novo in any animal cells.2 In addition, the exclusion of arginine from the study diet51 likely resulted from a lack of knowledge about arginine metabolism and nutrition in swine before the 1990s.25 Also, the conceptual foundation of the “ideal protein” on the composition of EAAs in the body or carcass is flawed, because the ratios of EAAs in animals (including swine) do not match those in diets due to the following factors.2,28 First, all AAs in the diet undergo catabolism at different rates in the mucosa (mainly enterocytes), microbes in the small intestine, or both. Due to the extensive first-pass metabolism of dietary AAs in the portal-drained viscera, the concentrations of AAs in plasma are very different from those in the ingested food (e.g. milk, forage, and corn- and soybean meal-based feed). Third, proteinogenic AAs in plasma are taken up by cells in animals at various rates and have various metabolic fates via diverse cell-specific metabolic pathways. Fourth, the types and AA composition of proteins in animals differ from those in plant-based foods. For these reasons, the usefulness of the early versions of the “ideal protein” for swine feeding is limited.
The “ideal protein” concept is not ideal in animal nutrition - Image 3
a These ratios are based on true digestible levels of amino acids in diet (as-fed basis; 90% dry matter). Adapted from Baker.46,47 Except for glycine, all amino acids are l-isomers.
b Patterns of amino acid composition in the ideal protein are the same for male and female chickens. The amounts of digestible lysine in diet (as-fed basis; 90% dry matter) are 1.12 and 1.02% for male and female chickens, respectively.
c Patterns of amino acid composition in the ideal protein are the same for male and female chickens. The amounts of digestible lysine in diet (as-fed basis; 90% dry matter) are 0.89 and 0.84% for male and female chickens, respectively.
d Patterns of amino acid composition in the ideal protein are the same for male and female chickens. The amounts of digestible lysine in diet (as-fed basis; 90% dry matter) are 0.76 and 0.73% for male and female chickens, respectively.
eThese ratios are based on total amino acids in a typical corn- and soybean meal-based diet.45 The amount of digestible lysine in diet (as-fed basis; 90% dry matter) is 1.2% for 0–21-day-old chicks.
The “ideal protein” concept is not ideal in animal nutrition - Image 4
a These ratios are based on true digestible levels of amino acids in diet, except for ARC.49 Except for glycine, all amino acids are l-isomers.
b The body proteins in 20–45kg pigs contain 63g lysine/16g nitrogen.
c These ratios are based on total amino acids in the diet. The total level of lysine in the diet is 1.10% (as-fed basis; 90% dry matter).
d The diet contains 1.20% true digestible lysine (as-fed basis; 90% dry matter).
e The diet contains 1.01% true digestible lysine (as-fed basis; 90% dry matter).
f Provided as the nitrogenous source for synthesis of other NEAA in animals.
g Dietary requirements are for 25–50kg gilts.
h Dietary requirements are for 10–20kg pigs.
i Total amino acid in a typical corn- and soybean meal-based diet (as-fed basis; 90% dry matter). The diet contains 1.40% total lysine.54
j The ratio of l-methionine to l-cystine is 1:1.
kThe ratio of l-phenylalanine to l-tyrosine is 53:47.
l The ratio of l-methionine to l-cystine is 47:53.
m The ratio of l-phenylalanine to l-tyrosine is 64:36.
n The ratio of l-methionine to l-cystine is 51:49.
o The ratio of l-phenylalanine to l-tyrosine is 63:37
During the late 1980s, Wang and Fuller51 used young gilts (25–50kg) in feeding trials to revise EAA patterns in the earlier “ideal protein” by considering maintenance requirements for AAs. Disappointingly, the authors also did not consider arginine, histidine, and AASAs in the “ideal protein.” The semi-purified diets used in the study of Wang and Fuller51 included a high amount of glutamic acid as the sole source of nonspecific AA nitrogen (826% of the lysine content). Unfortunately, the content of glutamate in the feedstuffs used for all those previous studies was not determined due to technical difficulties.46,48–51 As in the earlier work with chickens noted previously, Wang and Fuller51 did not consider that (1) such a high intake of glutamate by swine may have possible adverse effects on animal metabolism and health (including intestinal health) and (2) growing pigs have a dietary requirement for glutamic acid and glutamine. Adequate provisions of these two AA in diets are crucial for the maximum growth, optimum intestinal health, and maximum production performance of pigs.55,56
During the 1990s, Baker’s group52 recognized some of the deficiencies in the “ideal protein” for swine diets and, therefore, conducted a series of feeding trials to determine optimum ratios of EAAs to lysine in the purified diets for 10–20kg pigs. In their study,52 the basal diet contained 1.2% true digestible lysine and the various ratios of the following five AAs relative to lysine (arginine, 0.42; glycine, 1.00; histidine, 0.32; and proline, 0.33, and glutamic acid (the sole source of nonspecific AA nitrogen), 8.78. The inclusion of arginine, glycine, histidine, and proline in the swine diets was a significant improvement over Wang and Fuller’s version of the “ideal protein” for gilts.51 However, the “ideal protein” of Chung and Baker52 for swine diets still did not include (1) cysteine and tyrosine, which are not synthesized de novo in any animal cells; and (2) many AASAs (alanine, aspartate, asparagine, glutamine, and serine), which are abundant in the body and actively participate in metabolism, including one-carbon metabolism and the synthesis of purine and pyrimidine nucleotides.2 In addition, although Baker’s group,41,52 like other researchers,34,51 used glutamic acid to formulate isonitrogenous diets for animal feeding, none of these investigators considered that animals have dietary requirements for glutamic acid and glutamine for optimal growth, intestinal health, and production performance.55,56 There is no experimental evidence that the supplemental glutamate supports an adequate synthesis of all other AASAs (including alanine, asparagine, aspartate, glutamine, and serine) in pigs. Furthermore, Chung and Baker52 did not explain why different amounts of arginine, glycine, histidine, and proline were included in the diets for growing pigs. Unfortunately, the 10th edition of the Swine Nutrient Requirements by the NRC53 did not recognize that young pigs have dietary requirements for proline and glycine. Possibly due to this official publication, Baker47 excluded these two AAs from his last version of the “ideal protein” for swine diets. Disappointingly, guided by the outdated concept of the ideal protein, the NRC54 also failed to recognize the important role of dietary glutamate, glycine, and proline in swine nutrition. These AAs, along with glutamine and arginine, are crucial for maximum growth and production performance in swine.2,25,55–57
Moving beyond the “ideal protein” concept
The “ideal protein” concept has greatly advanced the field of swine and poultry protein nutrition over the last four and six decades, respectively, resulting in the practice of dietary supplementation with crystalline EAAs to improve the growth, feed efficiencies and productivity of pigs and poultry.14,37,58–62 This nutritional concept has also been adopted by the dairy cattle industry to provide rumen-escape protein or EAAs for high-producing cows14 and highlighted in the literature concerning the nutrition of other farm animals, including fish and crustaceans.63 In addition, the “ideal protein” concept is now also used to feed zoo64 (e.g. carnivores) and companion65,66 (e.g. cats and dogs) animals. However, the “ideal protein” concept is imperfect in animal nutrition for the following reasons. First, the composition of AAs in the diet is not the same as that in the whole body due to the catabolism of dietary AAs by the mucosa, microbes, or both of the small intestine at various rates, as indicated previously.28 In addition, the composition of AAs (particularly glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline) in the animal body varies with age4 and, therefore, data on carcass or muscle AA composition at one particular age may not be applicable to other ages. Second, EAAs are degraded in extraintestinal tissues at various rates via a cell-specific manner, resulting in the synthesis of AASAs (particularly glutamate, glutamine, glycine, and proline) at various rates.2 Third, the amounts of EAAs and the ratios of EAAs to lysine in diets are only some of the factors that affect protein nutrition in animals. As noted previously, animals have dietary requirements for AASAs for realizing their genetic potentials for maximum growth and production performance (e.g. embryonic survival, milk yield, and postweaning survival) and optimum health (e.g. intestinal health in weanling piglets, antioxidative responses in endotoxin-challenged pigs, and the resistance of pigs and rodents to pathogens).67 Sufficient AASAs must be provided in diets. Fourth, the “ideal protein” concept does not take, into consideration, the needs of animals for dietary AASAs for optimum metabolic processes and intestinal microbial metabolism.
Fifth, the “ideal protein” concept ignores the nutritional and physiological needs of the small intestine, the reproductive system, and immunocytes of animals (including pigs, chickens, and fish) for AASAs, which are not only major energy sources for enterocytes but also key regulators of gene expression, gut integrity, spermatogenesis, embryonic survival, immunity, and health.3,13,29,56,67–69 For example, dietary glutamate, glutamine, glycine, and proline protect the small intestine from oxidative stress and atrophy in weanling pigs,2,55–57 whereas dietary arginine enhances placental water transport and nitric oxide (NO) synthesis, as well as embryonic and fetal survival in gestating swine.69–71 Furthermore, a lack of glutamate or glutamine in diets results in high rates of mortality in juvenile hybrid-striped bass.72 Thus, although poultry and swine nutritionists have adopted the “ideal protein” concept for animal feeding for over 60 and 40 years, respectively, the production performance and feed conversion efficiencies of swine and poultry remain suboptimum.73–75 For example, adequate provision of arginine, glutamate, glutamine, glycine, and proline in diets are required to improve health (including intestinal and reproductive health), growth performance, lactation, and productivity of swine.25,28,68,73 In addition, sufficient dietary glutamate and glutamine are also essential for maximum lean tissue gain in broiler chickens particularly under stress conditions.26,29 Furthermore, although there have been good progress in the manufacturing of environmentally sustainable, low-CP diets based on the “ideal protein” concept to meet the requirements of swine and poultry for all EAAs, all the attempts without the inclusion of AASAs in diets have not been successful for the maximum growth or productivity of the animals.76–79
In view of the foregoing, we suggest that the “ideal protein” concept be replaced with “optimum ratios and amounts of all proteinogenic AAs” for animals. This new concept provides the much-needed scientific basis for formulating low-protein diets with AASAs, such as glutamate, glutamine, glycine, proline, and serine. Dietary provision of these AAs that are highly abundant in the body will minimize the needs for both dietary EAAs and energy to synthesize AASAs via cell-specific metabolic pathways. Disappointingly, AASAs are currently not considered in most studies for reducing CP content in animal diets. Readers are referred to recent excellent reviews on this topic.62,80 The revision of the “ideal protein” concept by the integration of AASAs can improve AA provision in the diets of animals. Because animals have dietary requirements for AAs but not protein,2 a term “optimal ratios and amounts of all proteinogenic AAs” is scientifically more accurate and practically more useful than the “ideal protein.” In the case of carnivorous species, taurine should also be provided in their diets to prevent damage to the eyes, heart, and other organs. Of note, there has been increasing interest in the use of protein hydrolysates (including small peptides) and functional AAs (in the crystalline or liquid form) to feed animals.2,62
Optimal ratios and amounts of all proteinogenic AAs in diets for swine and chickens, as well as companion and zoo animals
The proportions of skeletal muscle, connective tissue, white adipose tissue, and other tissues in animals (such as pigs and rats) change with the increase of age and may differ among different breeds of the same species.2,28 In addition, the proportions of specialized proteins (e.g. collagens) in animals increase with their growth.4 Thus, although the composition of AAs in individual proteins is generally not influenced by diet and disease, the composition of AAs and the rates of AA metabolism in animals (expressed per kg body weight) vary during their life cycles. Therefore, the requirements of animals for proteinogenic AAs and, in the case of carnivores, also taurine are not fixed but rather undergo dynamic changes during different physiological stages and in response to alterations in genotypes and environmental factors (including dietary composition, ambient temperatures, and infections). Furthermore, with improvements in animal-breeding techniques to produce new breeds of livestock, poultry, and fish, their lean tissue grows much faster than the previous breeds, and in the case of swine, a marked increase in both litter size at birth and skeletal muscle gain.73–75 Also, considerations for sustainability and value chain in animal agriculture call for precision nutrition in feeding practices. Adequate knowledge of AA metabolism and nutrition is necessary to meet the needs of animals for dietary AAs.81
Our guiding principles for the development of new optimal patterns of all AAs in diets for swine and chickens at a production stage are (1) endogenous syntheses of AASAs from EAAs are inadequate in highly productive animals, (2) EAAs and AASAs are needed in optimal proportions and amounts for maximum productivity and optimum health, (3) dietary AAs are metabolized at different rates in the small intestine of animals, and (4) dietary requirements of animals for AAs depend on tissue-specific protein turnover and AA metabolism. Since 1992, extensive research has been conducted to improve AA patterns in diets for gestating, lactating, suckling, weanling, and finishing swine through both basic research on AA metabolism and dietary supplementation with functional AAs (including arginine, glutamine, glutamate, proline, or glycine).2,25,28,68,69,82 Research to refine dietary requirements of lactating sows for AAs (including AASAs) has also been advanced through the determination of their mammary gland growth and development, wholebody composition of all proteinogenic AAs, as well as milk composition and production.2,12,28,59,61 The quantifiable outcomes are increases in the number and litter weight of live-born piglets, the growth and survival rates of neonatal and postweaning piglets, the milk yield of lactating sows and their subsequent pregnancy rates, as well as immunity and resistance to infectious pathogens. Similarly, the past 30 years have witnessed remarkable progress in the productivity of birds (e.g. growth rate, feed efficiency, and egg production).26,37,60,75
With advances in our understanding of AA biochemistry and nutrition over the past three decades, Wu and coworkers have proposed optimal ratios and amounts of true digestible AAs in diets for swine (Table 5) and chickens (Table 6) during the different phases of their growth and production. Values for cats83 as well as carnivorous and omnivorous zoo animals31 have also been proposed in recent years. Because the dynamic requirements of animals for dietary AAs are influenced by a plethora of factors as indicated previously, the data in Tables 5 and 6 as well as the literature31,83 serve only as references to guide feeding practices and nutritional research. Diets should be formulated for animals on farms under their practical production conditions for optimum nutrient efficiencies. Note that (1) the recommendations include AASAs in the optimal ratios and amounts of dietary AAs for swine and poultry, as well as other animals at various production stages and (2) animals have particularly high requirements for dietary arginine, glutamate, glutamine, glycine, and proline for optimum intestinal health, and these AAs are very abundant in animal-sourced feedstuffs, including blood meal, chicken visceral digest, feather meal, insect meal, intestinal mucosal and peptone products, meat and bone meal, and poultry by-products.84 These ingredients can increase both the sustainability of animal agriculture and value chain in animal nutrition. Of particular note, AASAs have now been used to cost-effectively manufacture diets for swine,25,69,85 poultry,86,87 fish,88 and crusyacean13 to enhance the efficiency of lean tissue growth. The optimal ratios and amounts of AAs in animal diets can reduce their protein content and feedstuff costs as well as the excretion of nitrogenous wastes and release of greenhouse gasses (e.g. methane and CO2) to the environment, while sustaining global animal agriculture.2,78,89-91 Additional benefits are improvements in growth, production performance, and food efficiency in livestock and companion animals, as well as the survival and expansion of extinct animals in the world.2,31 Furthermore, because the current Institute of Medicine publication, which does not adopt the “ideal protein” concept for the requirements of humans for dietary AAs, ignores the requirements of humans for AASAs,92 findings from farm and laboratory animals may have important implications for improving the nutrition of infants (particularly preterm babies), children, and adults (particularly the elderly).
The “ideal protein” concept is not ideal in animal nutrition - Image 5
a Data for Texas A&M University’s optimal ratios of true digestible amino acids are taken from Wu.67 Except for glycine, all amino acids are l-isomers. Values are based on true ileal digestible amino acids. Crystalline amino acids (e.g. feed-grade arginine, glutamate, glutamine, and glycine), whose true ileal digestibility is 100%, can be added to a diet to obtain their optimal ratios. The molecular weights of intact amino acids were used for all the calculations. The content of dry matter in all the diets was 90%. The content of metabolizable energy in the diets of growing pigs, gestating pigs, and lactating pigs is 3330, 3122, and 3310kcal/kg diet, respectively.
b Fed ad libitum (90% dry matter).
c Fed 2kg/day on days 0–90 and 2.3kg/day on days 90–114 (90% dry matter).
d Data from National Research Council (NRC 2012) refer to total amino acids in a typical corn- and soybean meal-based diet.54 Dry matter content of the diet is 90%. P1=parity 1; P2+=parity 2 or greater.
Conclusions
As the term “ideal protein” implies for nutrition, it should be a protein with optimal ratios of all AAs required for maximum growth and productivity, as well as optimum metabolic processes, intestinal microbial metabolism, and health in animals. However, the “ideal protein” concept, which was originally proposed in the 1950s and based solely on EAAs but ignored AASAs, is imperfect in animal nutrition. The long-standing term “NEAAs” has recently been recognized as a misnomer in nutritional science and, therefore, replaced by AASAs. Not all AASAs are sufficiently synthesized by mammals, birds, fish, and crustaceans for their maximum productivity. An ideal diet must provide all EAAs and AASAs (in the cases of carnivores, also taurine) in proper ratios and sufficient amounts. AASAs must be adequate in diets for minimizing the environmental impact of animal production. Animal-sourced feedstuffs supply abundant EAAs and AASAs (including glutamate, glutamine, glycine, proline, 4-hydroxyproline, and taurine) for the diets of both vertebrates and invertebrates to improve their growth, development, reproduction, and health. Nutritionists should think outside the box and move beyond the “ideal protein” concept to consider optimum ratios and amounts of all proteinogenic AAs in animal foods, and in the case of strict carnivores, also taurine in diets. This will help formulate effectively low-protein diets for livestock (including swine and high-producing dairy cattle), poultry, fish, and crustaceans, as well as zoo and companion animals, while sustaining global animal production.
The “ideal protein” concept is not ideal in animal nutrition - Image 6
Adapted from He et al.26
a Except for glycine, all amino acids are l-isomers. Values are based on true ileal digestible amino acids.
b Patterns of amino acid composition in the ideal protein are the same for male and female chickens. The amounts of digestible lysine in diet (as-fed basis; 90% dry matter) are 1.12 and 1.02% for male and female chickens, respectively.
c Patterns of amino acid composition in the ideal protein are the same for male and female chickens. The amounts of digestible lysine in diets (as-fed basis; 90% dry matter) are 0.89 and 0.84% for male and female chickens, respectively.
d Patterns of amino acid composition in the ideal protein are the same for male and female chickens. The amounts of digestible lysine in diets (as-fed basis; 90% dry matter) are 0.76 and 0.73% for male and female chickens, respectively.
e A diet that consists of 60% corn grain (containing 9.3% crude protein) and 24% soybean meal (43.5% crude protein), and is supplemented with 0.2% glycine and 0.1% l-methionine can meet the requirements of laying hens for all amino acids.
          
This article was originally published in Experimental Biology and Medicine 2022; 247: 1191–1201. DOI: 10.1177/15353702221082658. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License

1. Phang JM. Perspectives, past, present and future: the proline cycle/ prolinecollagen regulatory axis. Amino Acids 2021;53:1967–75
2. Wu G. Amino acids: biochemistry and nutrition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC
Press, 2022
3. Li XY, Zheng SX, Wu G. Nutrition and functions of amino acids in fish.
Adv Exp Med Biol 2021;1285:133–68
4. Li P, Wu G. Roles of dietary glycine, proline and hydroxyproline in collagen synthesis and animal growth. Amino Acids 2018;50:29–38
5. Moughan PJ, Schultze WH, Smith WC. Amino acid requirements of the growing meat rabbit 1. The amino acid composition of rabbit whole— body tissue—a theoretical estimate of ideal amino acid balance. Anim
Sci 1988;47:297–301
6. Wu ZL, Hou YQ, Dai ZL, Hu CA, Wu G. Metabolism, nutrition and redox signaling of hydroxyproline. Antioxid Redox Signal 2019;30:
674–82
7. Hu SD, He WL, Wu G. Hydroxyproline in animal metabolism, nutrition, and cell signaling. Amino Acids. Epub ahead of print 3 August
2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00726-021-03056-x
8. Bergen WG. Pigs (Sus Scrofa) in biomedical research. Adv Exp Med Biol
2022;1354:335–43
9. Reynolds LP, McLean KJ, McCarthy KL, Diniz WJS, Menezes ACB,
Forcherio JC, Scott RR, Borowicz PP, Ward AK, Dahlen CR, Caton JS.
Nutritional regulation of embryonic survival, growth and development.
Adv Exp Med Biol 2022;1354:63–76
10. Smith BI, Govoni KE. Use of agriculturally important animals as models in biomedical research. Adv Exp Med Biol 2022;1354:315–33
11. Wu G, Wu ZL, Dai ZL, Yang Y, Wang WW, Liu C, Wang B, Wang
JJ, Yin YL. Dietary requirements of “nutritionally nonessential amino acids” by animals and humans. Amino Acids 2013;44:1107–13
12. Davis TA, Fiorotto ML, Reeds PJ. Amino acid compositions of body and milk protein change during the suckling period in rats. J Nutr
1993;123:947–56
13. Li XY, Han T, Zheng SX, Wu G. Nutrition and functions of amino acids in aquatic crustaceans. Adv Exp Med Biol 2021;1285:169–98
14. Boisen S, Hvelplund T, Weisbjerg MR. Ideal amino acid profiles as a basis for feed protein evaluation. Livest Prod Sci 2000;64:239–51
15. Bergen WG. Amino acids in beef cattle nutrition and production. Adv
Exp Med Biol 2021;1285:29–42
16. Cao Y, Yao J, Sun X, Liu S, Martin GB. Amino acids in the nutrition and production of sheep and goats. Adv Exp Med Biol 2021;1285:63–79
17. Mansilla WD, Htoo JK, de Lange CFM. Nitrogen from ammonia is as efficient as that from free amino acids or protein for improving growth performance of pigs fed diets deficient in nonessential amino acid nitrogen. J Anim Sci 2017;95:3093–102
18. Lardy HA, Feldott G. The net utilization of ammonium nitrogen by the growing rat. J Biol Chem 1950;186:509–10
19. Featherston WR, Bird HR, Harper AE. Effectiveness of urea and ammonium nitrogen for the synthesis of dispensable amino acids by the chick. J Nutr 1962;78:198–206
20. Grimson RE, Bowland JP. Urea as a nitrogen source for pigs fed diets supplemented with lysine and methionine. J Anim Sci 1971;33:58–63
21. Rose W, Smith L, Womack M, Shane M. The utilization of the nitrogen of ammonium salts, urea, and certain other compounds in the synthesis of non-essential amino acids in vivo. J Biol Chem 1949;181:
307–16
22. El Boushy AR. Broiler growth response from practical low-protein diets supplemented with urea and diammonium hydrogen phosphate.
Neth J Agric Sci 1980;28:147–55
23. Abderhalden E. Experiment on the feeding with completely degraded nutrition substances. Z Physiol Chem 1912;77:22–58
24. Hou YQ, Yin YL, Wu G. Dietary essentiality of “nutritionally nonessential amino acids” for animals and humans. Exp Biol Med 2015;240:
997–1007
25. Wu G, Bazer FW, Johnson GA, Hou YQ. Arginine nutrition and metabolism in growing, gestating and lactating swine. J Anim Sci 2018;
96:5035–51
26. He WL, Li P, Wu G. Amino acid nutrition and metabolism in chickens.
Adv Exp Med Biol 2021;1285:109–31
27. Wu G, Morris SM Jr. Arginine metabolism: nitric oxide and beyond.
Biochem J 1998;336:1–17
28. Wu G, Bazer FW, Dai ZL, Li DF, Wang JJ, Wu ZL. Amino acid nutrition in animals: protein synthesis and beyond. Annu Rev Anim Biosci
2014;2:387–417
29. He WL, Furukawa K, Toyomizu M, Nochi T, Bailey CA, Wu G. Interorgan metabolism, nutritional impacts, and safety of dietary L-glutamate and L-glutamine in poultry. Adv Exp Med Biol 2021;1332:107–28
30. Hou YQ, Wu G. Nutritionally nonessential amino acids: a misnomer in nutritional sciences. Adv Nutr 2017;8:137–9
31. Herring CM, Bazer FW, Wu G. Amino acid nutrition for optimum growth, development, reproduction, and health of zoo animals. Adv
Exp Med Biol 2021;1285:233–53
32. Glista WA, Mitchell HH, Scott HM. The amino acid requirements of the chick. Poult Sci 1951;30:915
33. Fisher H, Scott HM. The essential amino acid requirements of chicks as related to their proportional occurrence in the fat-free carcass. Arch
Biochem Biophys 1954;51:517–9
34. Klain GJ, Scott HM, Johnson BC. The amino acid requirements of the growing chick fed a crystalline amino acid diet. Poultry Sci 1960;39:
39–44
35. Baker DH, Sugahara M, Scott HM. The glycine-serine interrelationship in chick nutrition. Poult Sci 1968;47:1376–7
36. Graber G, Baker DH. The essential nature of glycine and proline for growing chickens. Poult Sci 1973;52:892–6
37. Baker DH. Advances in protein-amino acid nutrition of poultry. Amino
Acids 2009;37:29–41
38. Coon CN, Grossie VB Jr, Couch JR. Glycine-serine requirement for chicks. Poult Sci 1974;53:1709–13
39. Dean WF, Scott HM. The development of an amino acid reference diet for the early growth of chicks. Poult Sci 1965;44:803–8
40. Huston RL, Scott HM. Effect of varying the composition of crystalline amino acid mixture on weight gain and pattern of free amino acids in chick tissue. Fed Proc 1968;27:1204–9
41. Sasse CE, Baker DH. Modification of the Illinois reference standard amino acid mixture. Poult Sci 1973;52:1970–2
42. Baker DH, Han Y. Ideal amino acid profile for broiler chicks during the first three weeks posthatching. Poult Sci 1994;73:1441–7
43. Price WA Jr, Taylor MW, Russell WC. The retention of essential amino acids by the growing chick. J Nutr 1953;51:413–22
44. Robel E, Menge H. Performance of chicks fed an amino acid profile diet based on carcass composition. Poult Sci 1973;52:1219–21
45. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient Requirements of Poultry, ninth revised edition. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1994
46. Baker DH. Ideal amino acid profiles for swine and poultry and their applications in feed formulation. BioKyowa Tech Rev 1997;9:1–24
47. Baker DH. Recent advances in use of the ideal protein concept for swine feed formulation. Asian-Aus J Anim Sci 2000;13:294–301
48. Cole DJA. The amino acid requirements of pigs: the concept of an ideal protein. Pig News Info 1980;1:201–5
49. Agricultural Research Council (ARC). The nutrient requirements of pigs: technical review. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, 1981
50. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient requirements of swine (9th edn). Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1988
51. Wang TC, Fuller MF. The optimum dietary amino acid patterns for growing pigs. 1. Experiments by amino acid deletion. Br J Nutr 1989;62:77–89
52. Chung TK, Baker DH. Ideal amino acid pattern for ten kilogram pigs.
J Anim Sci 1992;70:3102–11
53. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient requirements of swine (10th edn). Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998
54. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient requirements of swine (11th edn). Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2012
55. Rezaei R, Knabe DA, Tekwe CD, Dahanayaka S, Ficken MD, Fielder
SE, Eide SJ, Lovering SL, Wu G. Dietary supplementation with monosodium glutamate is safe and improves growth performance in postweaning pigs. Amino Acids 2013;44:911–23
56. Wu G, Bazer FW, Johnson GA, Knabe DA, Burghardt RC, Spencer TE,
Li XL, Wang JJ. Important roles for L-glutamine in swine nutrition and production. J Anim Sci 2011;89:2017–30
57. Wang WW, Dai ZL, Wu ZL, Lin G, Jia SC, Hu SD, Dahanayaka S, Wu
G. Glycine is a nutritionally essential amino acid for maximal growth of milk-fed young pigs. Amino Acids 2014;46:2037–45
58. van Milgen J, Dourmad JY. Concept and application of ideal protein for pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2015;6:15
59. Kim SW, Wu G, Baker DH. Ideal protein and amino acid requirements by gestating and lactating sows. Pig News Inform 2005;26:89N–99N
60. Ekmay RD, De Beer M, Mei SJ, Manangi M, Coon CN. Amino acid requirements of broiler breeders at peak production for egg mass, body weight, and fertility. Poult Sci 2013;92:992–1006
61. Kim SW, Hurley WL, Wu G, Ji F. Ideal amino acid balance for sows during gestation and lactation. J Anim Sci 2009;87:E123–32
62. Eugenio FA, van Milgen J, Duperray J, Sergheraert R, Le Floc’h N.
Feeding intact proteins, peptides, or free amino acids to monogastric farm animals. Amino Acids 2022;54:157–68
63. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient requirements of fish and shrimp. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2011
64. Dierenfeld ES, Wedekind KJ, Middelbos I. Ideal protein and zoo carnivores: further considerations for optimizing diets. In: Proceedings of the ninth conference on zoo and wildlife nutrition, AZA Nutrition Advisory
Group (ed A Ward, A Coslik, M Maslanka M), Kansas City, MO, 22–28,
October, 2011, pp.1–5
65. Frantz NZ, Yamka RM, Friesen KG. The effect of diet and lysine: calorie ratio on body composition and kidney health in geriatric cats. Intern
J Appl Res Vet Med 2007;5:25–36
66. Baker DH. Comparative nutrition of cats and dogs. Annu Rev Nutr
1991;11:239–63
67. Wu G. Dietary requirements of synthesizable amino acids by animals: a paradigm shift in protein nutrition. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2014;5:34
68. Hou YQ, Wu G. L-Glutamate nutrition and metabolism in swine.
Amino Acids 2018;50:1497–510
69. Zhang Q, Hou YQ, Bazer FW, He WL, Posey EA, Wu G. Amino acids in swine nutrition and production. Adv Exp Med Biol 2021;1285:81–107
70. Zhu C, Li XL, Bazer FW, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Jiang ZY, Wu
G. Dietary L-arginine supplementation during days 14-25 of gestation enhances aquaporin expression in the placentae and endometria of gestating gilts. Amino Acids 2021;53:1287–95
71. Elmetwally MA, Li XL, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Herring CM,
Kramer AC, Meininger CJ, Bazer FW, Wu G. Dietary supplementation with L-arginine between Days 14 and 25 of gestation enhances NO and polyamine syntheses and expression of angiogenic proteins in porcine placentae. Amino Acids 2022;54:193–204
72. Jia SC, Li XY, Wu G. The lack of dietary glutamate and/or glutamine is detrimental to juvenile hybrid striped bass. In: Aquaculture America annual meeting, New Orleans, LA, 7–11 March 2019
73. Homma C, Hirose K, Ito T, Kamikawa M, Toma S, Nikaido S, Satoh
M, Uemoto Y. Estimation of genetic parameter for feed efficiency and resilience traits in three pig breeds. Animal 2021;15:100384
74. Patience JF, Rossoni-Serao MC, Gutierrez NA. A review of feed efficiency in swine: biology and application. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2015; 6:33–42
75. Maharjan P, Martinez DA, Weil J, Suesuttajit N, Umberson C,
Mullenix G, Hilton KM, Beitia A, Coon CN. Physiological growth trend of current meat broilers and dietary protein and energy management approaches for sustainable broiler production. Animal 2021;15:100284
76. Deng D, Li AK, Chu WY, Huang RL, Li TJ, Kong XF, Liu ZJ, Wu GY,
Zhang YM, Yin YL. Growth performance and metabolic responses in barrows fed low-protein diets supplemented with essential amino acids. Livest Sci 2007;109:224–7
77. Peng X, Hu L, Liu Y, Yan C, Fang ZF, Lin Y, Xu SY, Li J, Wu CM, Chen
DW, Sun H, Wu D, Che LQ. Effects of low-protein diets supplemented with indispensable amino acids on growth performance, intestinal morphology and immunological parameters in 13 to 35 kg pigs. Animal
2016;10:1812–20
78. Kidd MT, Maynard CW, Mullenix GJ. Progress of amino acid nutrition for diet protein reduction in poultry. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2021;12:45
79. Liu SY, Macelline SP, Chrystal1 PV, Selle PH. Progress towards reduced-crude protein diets for broiler chickens and sustainable chicken-meat production. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2021;12:20
80. Chalvon-Demersay T, Luise D, Le Floc’h N, Tesseraud S, Lambert
W, Bosi P, Trevisi P, Beaumont M, Corrent E. Functional amino acids in pigs and chickens: implication for gut health. Front Vet Sci
2021;8:663727
81. Wu G. Amino acids in nutrition, health, and disease. Front Biosci 2021;
26:1386–92
82. Li XL, Johnson GA, Zhou HJ, Burghardt RC, Bazer FW, Wu G. Microarray analysis reveals an important role for dietary L-arginine in regulating global gene expression in porcine placentae during early gestation.
Front Biosci 2022;27:033
83. Che DS, Nyingwa PS, Ralinala KM, Maswanganye GMT, Wu G.
Amino acids in the nutrition, metabolism, and health of domestic cats.
Adv Exp Med Biol 2021;1285:217–31
84. Li P, Wu G. Composition of amino acids and related nitrogenous nutrients in feedstuffs for animal diets. Amino Acids 2020;52:523–42
85. Le Floc’h N, Wessels A, Corrent E, Wu G, Bosi P. The relevance of functional amino acids to support the health of growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci
Technol 2018;245:104–16
86. Belloir P, Méda B, Lambert W, Corrent E, Juin H, Lessire M, Tesseraud
S. Reducing the CP content in broiler feeds: impact on animal performance, meat quality and nitrogen utilization. Animal 2017;11:1881–9
87. Belloir P, Lessire M, Lambert W, Corrent E, Berri C, Tesseraud S.
Changes in body composition and meat quality in response to dietary amino acid provision in finishing broilers. Animal 2019;13:1094–102
88. Li XL, Zheng SX, Wu G. Nutrition and metabolism of glutamate and glutamine in fish. Amino Acids 2020;52:671–91
89. Chrystal PV, Moss AF, Khoddami A, Naranjo VD, Selle PH, Liu SY.
Impacts of reduced-crude protein diets on key parameters in male broiler chickens offered maize-based diets. Poult Sci 2020;99:505–16
90. Wu G. Nutrition and metabolism: foundations for animal growth, development, reproduction, and health. Adv Exp Med Biol 2022;1354:
1–24
91. Wang Y, Zhou J, Wang G, Cai S, Zeng XF, Qiao SY. Advances in lowprotein diets for swine. J Animal Sci Biotechnol 2018;9:60
92. Institute of Medicine (IOM). Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrates, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, proteins, and amino acids. Washington,
DC: The National Academies Press, 2005

Related topics
Authors:
Guoyao Wu
Texas A&M University
Follow
Join to be able to comment.
Once you join Engormix, you will be able to participate in all content and forums.
* Required information
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Create a post
Luis Fernando Vergamini Luna
Opta Alimentos e Insumos
29 de mayo de 2023
Just to put some pepper to the discussion, approximately 60% of the Methionine requirement from modern broilers comes from vegetable sources. Congratulation on the discussion about nonessential amino acids, that is truly great, and a better understanding of NEAA in the microbiota patterns are welcomed.
Surinder Maini
15 de enero de 2023
In my opinion, the problem is not with the producers n suppliers, problem is with the regulators, corrupt drug dept personal, govt agencies n research institutions, any product intended to be introduced in the market, needs to b analysed, studied, only if comparitve results obtained, be allowed to be introduced, as it affects the birds/ animal health n well being first n also enters the human food chain n has environmental impact. Regulators not doing their job must be punished along with the company or person introducing sub standard products in the market, our ineffective, inefficient n corrupt judiciary n govt depts be sentisised with the facts n procedures to ensure quality, effectiveness n economy
Dr Kotaiah Talapaneni
Indbro Research & Breeding Farms
13 de enero de 2023
Herbal methionines were introduced when there was a severe shortage of d.l.methioninine. herbal methionine is a powder which has comparatively higher level of methionine compared to other grains and cakes which are known to contain different levels. Some body analyzed the samples of herbal methionine sold in the market and found 3% d.l.methionine with the same test used for measuring the methionine content. When questioned, the herbal methionine suppliers are putting up a different theory. Their version is that herbal methionine works like d.l methionine. The component it contains cannot be measured in the same way as d.l.methionine is measured. But it gives same biological results as d.l.m but the action is not explained in scientific terms. The results out of herbal methionine are far inferior to synthetic d.l.m. many herbal.profucts are coming in to poultry feeding as growth promoters, immunity boosters and anti microbial. Ban on antibiotic feed additives and some times short supplies of synthetic amunoacids are leaving a place for these products. Number of suppliers are springing up and the performance should be tested before large scale application.
Martin Smith
Evonik Animal Nutrition
13 de enero de 2023
I should like also to comment from Dr. Marchenkov regarding "vegetable methionine". As Dr. Wu correctly states, methionine is methionine; an amino acid with a clearly defined structure INDEPENDENT of the source. I have seen numerous products claiming to be "Herbal methionine" and these materials are not methionine, and do not contribute methionine. When used in correctly balanced and formulated diets, they invariably result in reduced animal performance. They will only work in diets that contain an excess of methionine ie where supply is significantly higher than the bodies demand for methionine, whether for protein synthesis or other essential functions such as glutathionine production. So please; no more mention of "vegetable / herbal methionine".
Dr. Fiodor S. Marchenkov
Kronos -Agro private company
30 de diciembre de 2022
But animals can improve the ratio of amino acids and make this ratio closer to the theoretical model of an ideal protein using biochemical reactions for the synthesis of the desired amino acids, the degradation of unnecessary amino acids, and the transamination of amino acids. This requires specific conditions and cofactors, for example, coenzymes, electron donors and acceptors, necessary trace elements.
Juarez Donzele
Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV
4 de octubre de 2022

I congratulate the authors for the information contained in this article, which I fully agree with. I also understand that the article that was published on ENGORMIX, under the title Digestible lysine levels obtained by two methods of formulation of diets for 22-to-42-day-old broilers, under my guidance, is somehow consistent with the information described here.

Dr. Fiodor S. Marchenkov
Kronos -Agro private company
16 de septiembre de 2022
Although I agree with the author of the article about the difficulties of practical application of the ideal protein concept, nevertheless, I believe that this concept has the right to exist as a mathematical model. It can be used to get closer to the most efficient protein absorption. But in practice, fluctuations in the composition of grain raw materials and protein sources are observed, and the metabolism of animals and birds also differs both from the type of animals, and from age and various physiological stages. Therefore, the concept of an ideal protein in practice cannot be applied perfectly. As a biochemist, I believe that one should simply strive for the optimal ratio of amino acids. Typically, requirements for amino acids and other substances in the diet are developed by geneticists and breeders and are attached to the technological passport of the bird. This is the most important basic information to follow.
Dr Kotaiah Talapaneni
Indbro Research & Breeding Farms
12 de septiembre de 2022

can some one explain what is ideal protein concept?

Oscar Briceño
11 de septiembre de 2022

Very interesting and I will be attentive to the discussion which should be very enriching.

Guoyao Wu
Texas A&M University
23 de agosto de 2022
Welcome to discussions on this new paper regarding the “ideal protein” concept in animal nutrition. Thanks for your participation!
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.
LoginRegister