Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

Effect of high concentrations of dietary vitamin D3 on pullet and laying hen performance, skeleton health, eggshell quality, and yolk vitamin D3 content when fed to W36 laying hens from day of hatch until 68 wk of age

Published: January 11, 2022
By: J. Wen 1, K. A. Livingston 2, and M. E. Persia 1 / 1 Department of Animal and Poultry Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA; 2 Prestage Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Summary

The objective of this experiment was to investigate the effects of various dietary concentrations of vitamin D3 (D3) on pullet and laying hen performance, eggshell quality, bone health, and yolk D3 con-tent from day of hatch until 68 wk of age. Initially, 440 Hy-line W36-day-old chicks were randomly assigned to 5 dietary treatments: 1,681 (control); 8,348; 18,348; 35,014; 68,348 IU D3/kg. At 17 wk of age, pullets were assigned to experimental diets with 12 replicate groups of 6 birds. At 17 wk of age, pullets fed diets containing 8,348 and 35,014 IU D3/kg had an increased bone mineral density in comparison to the control fed birds (P 0.01). Body weights of pullets fed the diet with 68,348 IU D3/kg were lower than other treatments (≤ 0.01). Hen-housed egg production (HHEP) of hens fed the 35,014 IU D3/kg diet was increased in comparison to control-fed hens (P 0.01), whereas HHEP of those fed 68,348 IU D3/kg diet was reduced in comparison to all other treatments (P 0.01). Shell breaking strength of eggs from hens fed 8,348, 35,014 and 68,348 IU D3/kg was increased in comparison to eggs from control-fed birds (P 0.01). Fat-free tibia ash content of hens fed any of the diets supplemented with D3 (8,348 to 68,348 IU D3/kg) was increased in comparison to control-fed hens (P 0.05). Yolk D3 content increased linearly with dietary D3 and the D3 transfer efficiency for the control, 8,348 IU, 18,348 IU, 35,014 IU, and 68,348 IU D3 treatments were 8.24, 10.29, 11.27, 12.42, and 12.06%, respectively. These data suggest that supplementation of dietary D3 up to 35,014 IU D3/kg feed maintained if not increased laying hen performance and enhanced pullet and laying hen skeletal quality as well as yolk D3 content and eggshell quality. Feeding pullets at a higher level 68,348 IU of D3 resulted in reduced growth and ultimately decreased performance of laying hens.

Key words: laying hen, vitamin D3, skeleton health, eggshell quality, yolk vitamin D3 concentration.

INTRODUCTION
Vitamin D is a group of closely related compounds that have antirachitic activity. It has been estimated that nearly 50% of the United States population is at risk for vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency (Holick et al., 2011). Vitamin D3 (D3) deficiency can cause rickets in young children or increase the risk of osteoporosis and osteomalacia in adults (Holick, 2005). One approach to increase D3 intake in a population without changing eating habits is to produce D3-fortified eggs (Mattila et al., 2004). As a fat-soluble vitamin, D3 from the hen diet is absorbed into the blood stream and transferred to egg yolk via the ovary. Previous reports have demonstrated a linear increase on egg D3 concentration with increasing dietary D3, with no changes in physical, functional and sensory quality properties in the high D3 eggs (Yao et al., 2013).
In addition to fortifying eggs, high dietary D3 may potentially affect calcium and phosphorus metabolism and related biological characteristics in laying hens. Tibia breaking strength increased when hens were fed diets with 6,000 or 15,000 IU D3/kg in comparison to control-fed birds (2,500 IU D3/kg), in laying hens from 20 to 67 wk of age (Mattila et al., 2004). In contrast, neither egg specific gravity nor eggshell strength was affected by diet supplementation with D3 from 2,500 to 15,000 IU/kg. Egg specific gravity and eggshell breaking strength increased in hens fed diets containing 2,400 IU D3/kg in comparison to those fed a diet containing 300 IU D3/kg (Zang et al., 2011)). However, another experiment using higher supplementation with D3 (2,200 to 102,200 IU/kg of diet) found no effect on either eggshell or bone quality in Hy-line W36 laying hens from 19 to 58 wk of age (Persia et al., 2013). Whereas the focus of previous research has been improving bone health of laying hens or egg shell quality by increasing D3during the egg laying phase, limited research has been conducted on the effect of increased dietary D3 of pullets as well as laying hens on pullet bone development and the subsequent impact on laying hen skeletal health and eggshell quality. The objective of the current experiment was to determine the effects of feeding various concentrations of dietary D3 to birds (day of hatch to 68 wk) on pullet and laying hen bone health, hen performance, and eggshell quality. The hypothesis was that supplementation of laying hens with high concentration of vitamin D from day of hatch to the end of the experimental feeding period would not only increase the amount of vitamin D in the egg, it would also increase skeletal mineral status and egg shell quality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Diets
In total, 7 phases of diet were formulated for each treatment including starter 1 (week 0–4), starter 2 (week 5–8), grower (week 9–12), developer (week 13– 15), pre-laying (week 16–17), peak (week 18–24) and post-peak diets (week 25–68), respectively. The vitamin and mineral premix utilized produced basal diets containing 1,681 IU D3/kg (Table 1). Experimental diets were prepared by adding D3 (DSM Nutritional Prod-ucts Inc, Parsippany, NJ) at a concentration of 6,667, 16,667, 33,333, 66,667 IU/kg resulting in diets containing 1,681, 8,348, 18,348, 35,014, 68,348 IU D3/kg, respectively. These concentrations of supplemental Vita-min D were selection in an attempt to generate a range of egg vitamin D concentrations that can be used in conjunction with the previous literature and current commercial production to better understand the both the relationship between supplement and egg vitamin D concentrations and the toxicity of Vitamin D. Vitamin D3 premix was stored at 4C throughout the experimental period. Starter 1, starter 2, grower, developer, and pre-laying diets were manufactured as single batch diets whereas peak and post peak diets were manufactured every 2 wk due to longer feeding periods. Diet samples were collected over each mixing period and pooled into one sample per treatment for D3 analysis. With the exception of Ca and P, nutrient concentrations of the diets generally followed Hy-Line W-36 Commercial Layer Management Guidelines (2016). Calcium and P concentrations for starter 1, starter 2, grower, developer, pre-laying diets were set at 95% of NRC (1994) recommendation to simulate a potential commercial pullet flock that might be exposed to limited Ca and P availability. For peak and post peak diets, Ca and P concentrations were set at 100% of NRC (1994) recommendations.
Animals and Housing
All animal work was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Virginia Tech (Blacksburg, VA). Initially, 440-day-old chicks (Hy-line W36) were randomly assigned to one of 5 treatments with 2 replicates per treatment (84.5 cm2/bird) housed across the top tier of a three-tiered housing system. Initial chick body weight ranged between 39.1 and 39.6 g/bird on an average cage basis (P > 0.05). Birds in each treatment were subsequently split into 4 replicates (169.0 cm2/bird) at 2 wk of age and into 8 replicates (338.0 cm2/bird) at 6 wk of age, decreasing stocking density over time to maintain body mass per cage early in life. Increasing the replication was done by tier as well with the top 2 tiers used at 2 wk of age and all 3 tiers at 6 wk of age. In the pullet house, the environment was controlled according to Hy-Line W-36 Commercial Layer Management Guide (2016). The temperature was 32 to 33C at day of hatch and gradually decreased to 21C when the chicks reached 36 D of age. Light exposure was 20 h at day of hatch and decreased over time to 12 h at 11 wk of age. Pullets were allowed ad libi-tum access to feed and water. At 14 wk of age, pullets received a killed Salmonella enteritis vaccination (subcutaneous injection, 0.25 mL/bird). At 17 wk of age, 72 pullets in each treatment (those closest to the average body weight within each treatment) were moved into a multi-tiered, A-frame cage system resulting in 12 replicates of 6 birds per experimental unit (154.8 cm2/bird) for each of the 5 dietary treatments. Each experimental unit consisted of two consecutive cages with 3 birds per cage. The remaining 16 pullets from each treatment were euthanized, defeathered and the intact carcasses were stored at 20C until bone mineral analysis. During the egg laying phase, 95 to 97 g of feed was provided per hen per day and feed was provided at approximately 10 AM. Hens were housed in dark-out house conditions and light exposure increased from 12 to 16 h over 17 to 32 wk of age. House temperature was controlled via a fan and air inlet ventilation system and ranged from 21 to 27C over the duration of the experiment. Birds were monitored at least twice daily.
Data Collection
Pullets were weighed at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15, and 17 wk of age. Feed offered and refused was recorded weekly in both the pullet and egg production phases. Egg numbers and gross egg weight per pen were recorded daily. After the onset of lay, hens were weighed every 4 wk and at the end of the experiment. Feed intake, HHEP, egg weight, egg mass, and FCR were determined to correspond with the bi-weekly feed manufacture periods. Starting at 22 wk of age, internal and external egg quality were determined every 4 wk. Two eggs per experimental unit were collected and stored at 4C for 7 D until egg quality determination. Egg quality measurements included Haugh unit, egg composition, eggshell thickness, egg specific gravity, and eggshell breaking strength. During week 38, one egg from each pen was collected over 2 consecutive days and pooled by treatment (6 eggs total) for yolk vitamin D3 analysis. At 68 wk of age, 5 hens from each experimental unit were euthanized to collect keel bone and right and left tibia. Once collected, keel bones were stored in plastic bags and held at 4C until scored the next day. Both tibia were frozen at 20C until analysis.
Table 1. Pullet and laying hen basal diets1 for week 0–4, week 5–8, week 9–12, week13–15, week 16–17, week 18–24, and week 25–68.
Table 1. Pullet and laying hen basal diets1 for week 0–4, week 5–8, week 9–12, week13–15, week 16–17, week 18–24, and week 25–68.
Bone Mineral Density and Content
Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with a Lunar Prodigy machine (GE Lunar, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) was utilized to measure bone mineral density and mineral content of carcasses and tibia. The pullets euthanized at 17 wk of age were thawed and arranged on the target pad of the DXA analysis platform. Ten carcasses were scanned using a single pass of the machine using the small animal mode. The tibia collected from the hens at 68 wk of age were thawed, defleshed of adhering tissue, and placed on the same analysis platform to measure bone mineral density and bone mineral content using the small animal mode. For scanning, 5 tibias from each experimental unit were pooled to generate one replicate sample.
Yolk Vitamin D3 Concentration
Eggs collected at 38 wk of age were stored at 4C for no more than 3 D before they were analyzed. Yolks were separated from albumen by a yolk separator. All yolks from the same treatment were pooled and then homogenized using a spatula. The homogenized yolk sample for each of the 5 treatment was lyophilized and vacuum packed. Egg yolk subsample (100 g) from each treatment was sent for D3 analysis by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method (Heartland Assay LLC, Ames, Iowa). Vitamin D3 transfer efficiency was calculated (Yao et al., 2013) according to the following equation:
Transfer efficiency (%) = 100
×  [yolk cholecalciferol concentration (IU/g)
×  yolk mass (g)×egg production (% per hen per day)]
/   [feed cholecalciferol concentration (IU/g)
×  feed intake (g/D per hen)].
Eggshell and Tibia Breaking Strength
Eggshell and tibia breaking strength were measured with an Instron Universal Testing Machine Model 1011 (Instron Corp, Canton, MA). Each egg was placed on a base with the air cell or blunt end of the egg located to the bottom of the machine. A round steel head was used and lowered to the top of the egg (< 1 mm) before com-pressing. During testing, the steel head was advanced towards the egg at 10 mm/min to begin with, and af-ter the compression load reached 0.3 kg, the speed was reduced to 2 mm/min until the extension of the steel was 1.5 mm. Maximum compression load during this process was recorded.
Bone breaking strength was measured using a 3 point bending method. Tibia length was measured and middle point was marked. The tibia was placed on two paralleled vertical holders with a 42 mm span positioned so the middle point of the tibia was underneath the bottom of the loading head. Before testing, the loading head was lowered to barely touch the middle point of tibia with a preload compression level of around 0.05 kg. The loading head descended at rate of 5 mm/min until bone fracture. Maximum compression load before fracture was recorded.
Fat-Free Tibia Ash Content
Tibias were thawed, wrapped with aluminum foil, and autoclaved for 20 min. Tibias were then de-fleshed, had all cartilage removed, were placed into a glass beaker and then dried at 100C for 24 h. Dried tibias were wrapped with cheese cloth and placed in a soxhlet apparatus. Hexane was used to extract fat from the tibia bones for 48 h. Tibias were then taken out of the soxhlet apparatus and allowed to dry in a hood overnight to allow residual hexane to evaporate before being dried at 100C for 24 h. Tibia were weighed to determine dry fat-free weight, placed into a muffle furnace at 600C for 24 h and then reweighed to determine ash weight. Fat-free tibia ash content was calculated as below.
Fat – free tibia ash content(%)
=   (tibia ash weight/fatfree tibia dry weight)*
× 100%
Keel Bone Score
Keel bones collected from 5 hens per experimental unit were scored for damage using the method described by Donaldson et al. (2012). Bones were scored from 0 (no damage) to 3 (severe damage and multiple fractures):
0 = one fracture, usually toward the tip of the keel; 1 = 2–3 fractures or callus formation; 2 = multiple fractures or callus formation plus slight deformation at the fracture sites; 3 = multiple fractures or callus formation and severe deformations of the ventral edge
Statistical Analysis
SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) was used to analyze HHEP, feed intake, egg weight, egg mass, feed conversion ratio (FCR), Haugh unit, relative albumen weight, relative yolk weight, relative shell weight, shell thickness, egg specific gravity, eggshell breaking strength using a one-way ANOVA by repeated measures, with means separated using a Tukey’s adjustment. Single measurement response variables, including body weight, bone mineral density, and mineral content of pullets, tibia mineral density and mineral content of laying hens, bone breaking strength of laying hens, and fat-free tibia ash content of laying hens were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA with means separated using a Fisher’s LSD test. If significant differences were detected in the bone quality parameters (bone mineral density, bone mineral content, tibia breaking strength, and fat-free tibia ash), linear and quadratic responses were fitted on parameters. Keel bone scoring was analyzed using a non-parametric test (Wilcoxon/Kruskal– Wallis). Significance was accepted at P 0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Pullet Growth Performance
Generally, dietary D3 concentrations did not affect pullet growth performance or feed intake except for pul-lets fed 68,348 IU D3/kg. Feed intake of pullets from the current experiment was generally in the recommended range in the Hy-Line W-36 Commercial Layer Management Guide (in the Hyline W-36 Commercial Lay-ers Management Guide, 2016). However, at 17 wk of age, body weight of pullets fed 68,348 IU D3/kg was reduced in comparison to body weights of pullets fed the other treatments (P 0.05), 1164 g/bird versus 1,225 to 1,241g/bird. At 15 wk of age, feed intake of all treatments dropped below the recommended feed intake in the Hy-Line Guide (Hy-Line, 2016), but recovered at 16 wk of age. This reduction in feed intake was most likely associated with the SE vaccination at 14 wk. Mor-rissey et al. (1977) studied the toxicity of high-D3 diets (400, 4,000, 40,000, 400,000, 4,000,000 IU D3/kg) in pullets 14 to 28 D of age. These authors found reduced growth rate and feed intake in chicks fed 400,000 and 4,000,000 IU D3/kg at 6 and 14 D after the initiation of experiment, but no inhibition of growth in chicks fed 40,000 IU D3/kg or less. The results of the current experiment are in line with and further refine those of Morrissey et al. (1977), suggesting that reduced growth may occur at an even lower level of 68,348 IU D3/kg. Increased serum calcium, defined as a sign of toxicity, was observed by Morrissey et al. (1977) in the 400,000 and 4,000,000 IU treatments. Serum calcium was not measured in the current experiment, but the reduced body weight of pullets fed 68,348 IU D3 diet suggest it had a toxic effect on pullet growth.
Pullet Bone Quality
Bone mineral density of 17-wk old pullets fed high D3-diets was increased in comparison to the control-fed pullets (P 0.01; Table 2). Bone mineral density was increased in pullets fed 35,014 IU D3/kg in comparison to those fed control, 8,348, 18,348, and 68,348 IU D3/kg diets. In terms of mineral content, pullets fed diets with intermediate D3 (18,348 or 35,014 IU D3/kg) showed an increased bone mineral content in comparison to those fed control or 68,348 IU D3/kg diets (P0.01, Table 2). The previous literature is sparse concerning the effects of high dietary D3 on pullet skeletal health, but results from broiler experiments may provide valid comparisons, although differences in growth rate need to be considered between the fast growing broiler and slower growing laying hen pullet, these differences are somewhat mitigated by reduced feed intake in an the absence of laying hen pullet data are acceptable. Feeding broilers increased D3-diets (200, 800, 5,000, and 10,000 IU D3/kg) from day of hatch to 14 D of age, tibia breaking strength was maximized with 10,000 IU D3, and tibia ash was maximized in the 5,000 IU D3 treatment (Whitehead et al., 2004). In another experiment, tibia ash and toe ash increased as broilers were fed D3-diets increasing from 200 to 3,000 IU D3/kg diet from day of hatch to 42 D of age (Khan et al., 2010). The data in these two reports with broiler chicks are consistent with the results in this study which suggests that increased dietary D3 concentration can enhance bone mineral deposition during skeletal development in laying hen pullets.
Table 2. Body weight, bone mineral density, and bone mineral content of 17 wk old pullets fed diets containing 1,681, 8,348, 18,348, 35,014, or 68,348 IU of D3/kg of diet.
Table 2. Body weight, bone mineral density, and bone mineral content of 17 wk old pullets fed diets containing 1,681, 8,348, 18,348, 35,014, or 68,348 IU of D3/kg of diet.
Table 3. Hen-housed egg production (HHEP), feed intake, egg weight, egg mass, feed conversion ratio1 (FCR) from hens fed diets containing 1,681, 8,348, 18,348, 35,014, and 68,348 IU of D3/kg of diet during first cycle laying phase.
Table 3. Hen-housed egg production (HHEP), feed intake, egg weight, egg mass, feed conversion ratio1 (FCR) from hens fed diets containing 1,681, 8,348, 18,348, 35,014, and 68,348 IU of D3/kg of diet during first cycle laying phase.
Laying Hen Performance
Hens started to produce eggs at 19 wk of age. From 19 to 24 wk of age, HHEP dramatically increased from 0 to 95% at peak production. During this period, the increase of HHEP of hens fed 68,348 IU D3/kg was reduced in comparison to the other treatments, but reached the peak of egg production of the other treatments at 24 wk of age (Table 3). This response is likely explained by the reduced body weight of those hens as light hens produce fewer eggs at the initiation of the laying period (Leeson et al., 1997; Perez- Bonilla et al., 2012). Hen-housed egg production was similar across treatments during the early to peak production; however, HHEP among treatments started to diverge after 54 wk of age, resulting in differences across treatments. Hen-housed egg production of hens fed 35,014 IU D3/kg was significantly increased in comparison to the control fed birds with 8,348 and 18,348 IU D3/kg fed birds being intermediate. Hen-housed egg production of hens fed 68,348 IU D3/kg diet was significantly reduced in comparison to all other treatments. Egg mass of hens fed 35,014 IU D3 diet was significantly increased in comparison to hens fed 68,348 IU D3 with the other treatments being intermediate. Feed conversion ratio of control and 35,014 IU D3 fed birds was reduced when compared to that of 68,348 IU/kg-fed birds (P 0.01). The decrease in laying hen performance between 35,014 IU and 68,348 IU/k treatments is inconsistent with previous reports (Persia et al., 2013) in which laying hen performance from 19 to 58 wk of age was not affected by dietary Dup to 102,200 IU/kg. The major difference between the current experiment and previous reports is the timing of D3 supplementation; in the previous experiment D3 supplementation started at point of lay whereas Vitamin D3 treatment started at day of hatch in the current experiment. In the current experiment, reduced HHEP and egg mass in the 68,348 IU D3-fed hens may be explained by the reduced body weight of the pullets as they entered egg production; pullets with reduced body weight produce less total egg mass to 70 wk of age (Leeson et al., 1997) and produce fewer eggs at the start of the laying period (Perez-Bonilla et al., 2012).
Table 4. Egg characteristics from hens fed diets containing 1,681, 8,348, 18,348, 35,014, or 68,348 IU of D3/kg of diet during first cycle laying phase.
Table 4. Egg characteristics from hens fed diets containing 1,681, 8,348, 18,348, 35,014, or 68,348 IU of D3/kg of diet during first cycle laying phase.
Egg Characteristics
Haugh unit measurement of eggs from the 8,348 IU and 68,348 IU D3 treatments were lower than those from control, 18,348 and 35,014 IU D3-fed hens (P 0.01) (Table 4). These results are contrary to previous reports. Persia et al. (2013) indicated no difference in Haugh unit of eggs of hens fed various dietary D3 concentrations from 2,200 IU to 102,200 IU /kg feed whereas Park et al. (2005) demonstrated de-creased Haugh unit with increased dietary D3 up to 20,000 IU/kg. The contradictory responses among experiments of egg Haugh unit to variation in concentrations of dietary D3 may indicate that Haugh units are not directly associated with or are only slightly related to dietary D3 and that the differences noted may not be biologically relevant.
In the current experiment, no differences were observed in egg weight, relative shell weight, relative yolk weight, relative albumen weight, or eggshell thickness across treatments. In contrast, Ameenuddin et al. (1986) found that egg weight decreased with elevated D3-diets relative to the those of control-fed (960 IU D3) hens, but not until hens were fed 100,000 or 200,000 IU D3/kg, concentrations exceeding the maximum used in the current study. The previously reported results suggest that higher concentrations of D3may be needed to alter egg weights. Specific gravity of eggs from the 68,348 IU D3-fed hens was increased in comparison to the control and 18,348 IU D3-treatments with the other treatments being intermediate (P 0.01). Eggshell breaking strength in the 8,348, 35,014, or 68,348 IU D3 treatments was significantly increased relative to control-fed birds. Both indicators of eggshell quality, egg specific gravity and eggshell breaking strength, increased in high dietary D3 treatments relative to the control indicating that increased dietary D3 improved eggshell quality between 1,681 and 68,348 IU D3/kg In contrast, previous studies found that feeding enriched-D3 diets to laying hens didn’t affect either egg specific gravity or eggshell breaking strength (Mattila et al., 2003; Park et al., 2005). The difference in responses of eggshell quality to elevated D3-diets in this versus the other studies probably stem from variation in the age when the experimental diets were started. The previously reported experiments did not start to feed high D3 diets until after the onset of egg production; until then, pullets received diets with lower D3 concentrations. In contrast, hens in the current experiment received high D3 diets throughout pullet and egg laying phases.
Laying Hen Bone Quality
In terms of keel bone damage, no differences were observed across treatments. At the conclusion of the egg laying phase of the experiment (68 wk of feeding), tibia bone mineral content of hens in the 68,348 IU D3 treatment was increased in comparison to the control, 8,348 and 18,348 IU D3 fed hens (Table 5). Generally, the increased bone mineral content would be viewed as a positive outcome, but it is probably the result of the negative effect of the 68,348 IU D3 treatment on egg production; the increased tibia mineral content is expected due to reduced Ca and P utilized for egg shell production given the overall reduction in egg production. Fat-free tibia ash content of hens in the 8,348, 18,348, 35,014, and 68,348 IU D3 treatments were all increased in comparison to the control-fed hens (P ≤ 0.05). Unlike the response in this experiment, there was no difference in tibia ash content among laying hens fed D3 up to 102,200 IU/kg from 19 to 58 wk of age (Persia et al., 2013). Similarly, 34-wk-old white leghorns fed experimental diets with D3 up to 200,000 IU/kg of diet for 16 wk showed no difference in bone ash among treatments (Ameenuddin et al., 1986). The difference in results between the current and previous experiments suggest that bone development and skeletal status of pullets may play a more important role in maintaining skeleton bone health of layers than supplying higher dietary D3 during the egg production phase.
Table 5. Bone quality of hens fed diets containing 1,681, 8,348, 18,348, 35,014 or 68,348 IU of D3/kg of diet.
Table 5. Bone quality of hens fed diets containing 1,681, 8,348, 18,348, 35,014 or 68,348 IU of D3/kg of diet.
Figure 1. Cholecalciferol concentrations of and vitamin Dtransfer efficiency to eggs from hens fed diets containing 1,681; 8,348; 18,348; 35,014; and 68,348 IU of D3/kg of diet, respectively. Vitamin Dtransfer efficiency presented in parenthesis.
Figure 1. Cholecalciferol concentrations of and vitamin D3 transfer efficiency to eggs from hens fed diets containing 1,681; 8,348; 18,348; 35,014; and 68,348 IU of D3/kg of diet, respectively. Vitamin D3 transfer efficiency presented in parenthesis.
Despite the effect seen in this experiment of increasing D3-diets on the bone mineral content of layers, there was no difference in tibia breaking strength across treatments; however, there was a trend suggesting that high dietary Dmight improve tibia breaking strength (P = 0.09). Previous experiments have reported that tibia breaking strength of layers was significantly increased in hens fed 6,000 IU or 15,000 IU Ddiets relative to those fed 2,500 IU Dfrom 20 to 65 wk of age  (Mattila et al., 2004). Yet, in the current experiment no differences were observed in tibia bone mineral density among hens fed the different D diets (P = 0.13). Nonetheless, there was a linear increase in tibia bone mineral density and tibia bone mineral content as dietary Dconcentration increased (P ≤ 0.05). There was also a quadratic relationship between tibia bone breaking strength and Dconcentration. Therefore, fat-free tibia ash could be a better candidate than other bone quality indices to distinguish the difference between low and high dietary Din laying hen diets.
Egg Vitamin D3 Concentration
The concentration of D in egg yolks from the control, 8,348, 18,348, 35,014, and 68,348 IU Dtreatments was 12.6, 88.6, 214.3, 435.5, and 872.6 IU D3/egg, respectively (Figure 1). The increase of yolk Dconcentration with increasing dietary Din the current experiment was consistent with previous scientific reports (Yao et al., 2013). The transfer efficiency of vitamin Dfor the control, 8,348 IU, 18,348 IU, 35,014 IU, 68,348 IU Dtreatments was 8.24, 10.29, 11.27, 12.42, 12.06%, respectively. Current results are consistent with those of Yao et al. (2013) who reported that; the transfer efficiency of hens fed 9,700 to 24,700 IU Ddiets was between 11% to 14% which was 4 to 6 percent higher than control (2,200 IU D3). In the current experiment, the D3 transfer efficiency did not increase between the 35,014 IU, 68,348 IU Dtreatments (Figure 1). The results of Yao et al. (2013) suggest that 102,000 IU might be toxic to hens and caused mismetabolism of the vitamin D as the hens tried to reduce vitamin D exposure, but this phenomenon was not observed in the current experiment with 68,348 IU D3.
Data from current experiment indicate that feeding pullets and hens (day old to 68 wk of age) increased dietary D3, up to 35,014 IU /kg, would improve pullet skeletal quality and further enhance skeletal health and eggshell quality of the laying hens during first cycle production without decreasing performance of laying hens. Feeding pullet diets containing 68,348 IU D3/kg decreased body weight of pullets and negatively affected laying hen performance from 19 to 68 wk of age.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This experiment was financially supported by Egg Nutrition Center of the American Egg Board. Mention of a trade name, proprietary product, or specific equipment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by Virginia Tech, and does not imply approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable. The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance H. Yakout, D. Shumate, N. Barrett, M. White, I. Omara, C. Zumbaugh, D. Lewis, K. Foltz, B. Siobhan, J. Lewis, and undergraduates (Virginia Tech, Blacksburg) for animal care assistance and feed mixing.
    
This article was originally published in 2019 Poultry Science 98:6713–6720. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez386. This is an Open Access article under a Creative Commons license.

Ameenuddin, S., M. L. Sunde, H. F. DeLuca, and M. E. Cook. 1986. Excessive cholecalciferol in a layers diet: decline in some aspects of reproductive performance and increased bone mineralisation of progeny. Br. Poult. Sci. 27:671–677.

Donaldson, C. J., M. E. E. Ball, and N. E. O’Connell. 2012. Aerial perches and free-range laying hens: The effect of access to aerial perches and of individual bird parameters on keel bone injuries in commercial free-range laying hens. Poult. Sci. 91:304–315.

Holick, M. F. 2005. The vitamin D epidemic and its health consequences. J. Nutr. 135:2739S–2748S.

Holick, M. F., N. C. Binkley, H. A. Bischoff-Ferrari, C. M. Gordon, D. A. Hanley, R. P. Heaney, M. H. Murad, and C. M. Weaver. 2011. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 96:1911–1930.

Khan, S. H., R. Shahid, A. A. Mian, R. Sardar, and M. A. Anjum. 2010. Original Article: Effect of the level of cholecalciferol supplementation of broiler diets on the performance and tibial dyschondroplasia. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl.) 94:584– 593.

Leeson, S., L. Caston, and J. D. Summers. 1997. Layer performance of four strains of Leghorn pullets subjected to various rearing programs. Poult. Sci. 76:1–5.

Mattila, P., T. Rokka, K. K¨onk¨o, J. Valaja, L. Rossow, and E.-L. Ryh¨anen. 2003. Effect of cholecalciferol-enriched hen feed on egg quality. J Agric Food Chem. 51:283–287.

Mattila, P., J. Valaja, L. Rossow, E. Ven¨al¨ainen, and T. Tupasela. 2004. Effect of vitamin D2- and D3-enriched diets on egg vitamin D content, production, and bird condition during an entire production period. Poult. Sci. 83:433–440.

Mattila, P. H., E. Valkonen, and J. Valaja. 2011. Effect of different vitamin D supplementations in poultry feed on vitamin D content of eggs and chicken meat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59:8298– 8303.

Morrissey, R. L., R. M. Cohn, R. N. Empson, Jr., H. L. Greene, O. D. Taunton, and Z. Z. Ziporin. 1977. Relative Toxicity and Metabwolic Effects of Cholecalciferol and 25-Hydroxycholecalciferol in Chicks. J. Nutr. 107:1027–1034.

NRC. 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

Park, S. W., H. Namkung, H. J. Ahn, and I. K. Paik. 2005. Enrichment of vitamins D3, K and iron in eggs of laying hens. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci 18:226–229.

Perez-Bonilla, A., S. Novoa, J. Garcia, M. Mohiti-Asli, M. Frikha, and G. G. Mateos. 2012. Effects of energy concentration of the diet on productive performance and egg quality of brown egglaying hens differing in initial body weight. Poult. Sci. 91:3156– 3166.

Persia, M. E., M. Higgins, T. Wang, D. Trample, and E. A. Bobeck. 2013. Effects of long-term supplementation of laying hens with high concentrations of cholecalciferol on performance and egg quality. Poult. Sci. 92:2930–2937.

Whitehead, C. C., H. A. McCormack, L. McTeir, and R. H. Fleming. 2004. High vitamin D3 requirements in broilers for bone quality and prevention of tibial dyschondroplasia and interactions with dietary calcium, available phosphorus and vitamin A. Br. Poult. Sc. 45:425–436.

Yao, L., T. Wang, M. Persia, R. L. Horst, and M. Higgins. 2013. Effects of vitamin D3-Enriched diet on egg yolk vitamin D3 content and yolk quality. J. Food Sci. 78:C178–C183.

Zang, H., K. Zhang, X. Ding, S. Bai, J. Hern´andez, and B. Yao. 2011. Effects of different dietary vitamin combinations on the egg quality and vitamin deposition in the whole egg of laying hens. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic. 13:189–196.

Related topics:
Authors:
Kimberly Livingston
North Carolina State University - NCSU
North Carolina State University - NCSU
Mike Persia
Virginia Tech
Virginia Tech
Influencers who recommended :
Dr. Rafael Amable Vásquez Martínez
Recommend
Comment
Share
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Poultry Industry
Manuel Da Costa
Manuel Da Costa
Cargill
United States
Shivaram Rao
Shivaram Rao
Pilgrim´s
PhD Director Principal de Nutrición y Servicios Técnicos de Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation
United States
Karen Christensen
Karen Christensen
Tyson
Tyson
PhD, senior director of animal welfare at Tyson Foods
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.