Prevent Enteric Disorders in Commercial Poultry Production
Modern Dietary Approach to Prevent Enteric Disorders in Commercial Poultry Production
Published: January 16, 2009
By: Dr S. Chandrasekar - Manager-Technical Services (Poultry Products Group), Neospark Drugs and Chemicals Private Limited
With the ever increasing need for animal protein sources for human consumption, the poultry industry always coped up to meet the needs at an affordable manner. The conditions in developing countries for the production of either broiler or table egg may not be entirely free of unseen losses. The following article will review briefly about such losses by gut disorders and the approaches to avoid the same.
Broiler production in major countries is estimated to total 74,237,000 metric tons in 2009, 3.5% more than the 71,733,000 tons expected this year, according to data from USDA’s Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS).
Global egg production doubled between 1990 and 2005. By then, some 64 million tons of eggs were produced worldwide. Today there are approximately 4.93 billion egglaying hens in the world, each capable of producing up to 300 eggs per year. By 2015, world egg production is expected to reach 72 million tons, according to the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
At this point of time we should be highly thankful for superior genetic selection; the commercial poultry, both layer as well as broiler has undergone dramatic improvements in growth, feed efficiency and production. But at the same time due to its faster growth and high production efficiency, the modern poultry is highly vulnerable to acquire enteric pathogens as early as well. Gut health challenges are significant and most important issue for current poultry production. This may include viruses such as enterovirus, reovirus, rotavirus and other unnamed viruses, no need to mention the bacterial challenges (E. coli, Salmonella and Clostridium) and protozoal issues (Coccidia). More over with ever increasing feed cost, even one point lost in feed conversion or 0.01 % production drop will be a big economic challenge in long run for the commercial poultry producers in India even through the world. Some of us may be focusing much on very immediate returns on investment and failing to focus on long run profitability. Gut health issues can result in loss of feed conversion, uniformity, weight, rate of gain, exposure to common enteric pathogens, additional investment on treatment costs and higher condemnation rates. Therefore, early prevention of gut enteric challenges can result in significant savings.
As per recent estimates the approximate loss from a single bird due most common enteric disorders like Necrotic enteritis, Colibacillosis and Coccidiosis either clinically or sub-clinically are all put together is USD 10000-14000 per Lakh birds. At most times it is not less than USD 5000 – 6000 per lakh birds by either one or two causes. The causative agents like Enterococcus, Streptococcus and Staphylococcus are gaining access to entry even before the chicks receive their first drop of water at the farm. These causative organisms are ubiquitous in nature that is found in soil, dust, faeces, feed, poultry litter, and in intestinal contents (Ficken, M. D et al, 1997).
Although, small numbers of Clostridium perfringens, E. coli and other secondary bacterial pathogens are also commonly found in the intestinal tract of healthy broilers, but normally they may not cause clinical disease. Under normal conditions the beneficial bacteria (“good bacteria”) in the intestinal tract keep them under control i.e. small in number. However, when conditions change in the intestinal tract due to any sort of stress, the pathogens number will increase, toxins are produced and the clinical disease appears. While anything that causes intestinal irritation can lead to severe productive loss, like stress; sudden dietary changes; intestinal disease (worm infestation, coccidiosis); immune suppression etc., (Vijay. D et al, 2007).
In commercial farming operations, the sub-clinical course of disease may be most economically important form because it has been shown to impair feed conversion ratio and growth pattern in broilers (Stutz, H. W. et al, 1984) as well as production efficiency and growth pattern in layers. Like Salmonellosis, Colibacillosis infection plays a significant cost factor in poultry production not only in commercial operations but also in breeders through vertical transmission.
The sub-clinical infections like colibacillosis, necrotic enteritis is commonly seen in 2 to 5 weeks old broiler chickens raised on litter is accounts for USD 3000 – 4000 per lakh birds. Even in caged birds such as growers and layers the spread of these types of pathogens are very common and it results in 0.5-1.50% production loss throughout the life cycle (Vijay. D et al, 2007).
Prevention: Till date, for the prevention of losses from sub-clinical and clinical enteric disorders, the methods used by way of providing antibacterial feed additives, also referred to as antibiotic growth promoters, such as Virginiamycin, Lincomycin, Tylosin, Neomycin and Penicillin (Ficken, M. D. et al, 1997 and Stutz, H. W. et al, 1984). In recent years with the increase in export of eggs as well as frozen and ready to eat form of chicken preparations and the restrictions on the use of regular antibiotic feed supplements which hitherto are most successfully used to control the incidence of clinical and subclinical Necrotic Enteritis.
In consequence to this the occurrence of Necrotic Enteritis, Colibacillosis and some other non-specific enteritis has become epidemic in most part of the country in commercial flocks especially in broilers (25 to 40%). Keeping these things in mind, new strategies to be identified and adopted for the prevention and control of these unobserved losses.
As discussed earlier it has been documented that disturbances in the intestinal microflora leads to elevated levels of C. perfringens and Colibacilli (Fukata, T. et al, 1991). And it has been found that the pathogenic effects of these organisms could be reduced by feeding chicks as well as growers (which as more susceptible) and layers with optimally concentrated probiotic. Few other researchers also observed that the use of continuous competitive exclusion (CE) cultures of chicken intestinal flora (viable colonies) could reduce the incidence of clinical mortality and cecal colonization and prevent subclinical negative effects on body weight and feed efficiency in broiler chickens as well as production performance of layers (Elwinger, K., et al. 1992 and Hofacre, C. L., et al 1998).
Development of Bacterial Colonies in chicken Intestine:
The results of a recent study indicated that in young chicks the major species present in the small intestines and caeca was Lactobacilli, with a Bifidobacteria population becoming more dominant in the caeca at older age. Clostridium was detected in some segments of the small intestine in young chicks. In older chickens, Salmonella, Campylobacter, and E. coli species were found in the ceca.
During the first 2 to 4 days of post-hatch, Streptococci and Enterobacteria colonize the small intestine and caecum. After the first week, Lactobacillus predominate in the small intestine, and the caecum is colonized mainly by anaerobes (Bacteroides) and facultative anaerobes (Escherichia coli).
The study further reports about how the bacteria colonize in gut at different periods of chicken life;
In chicken caeca at 4 days, the relative proportion of Lactobacilli was about 25% of the total examined bacteria and Bifidobacterium was not detected. Relatively high proportions of Salmonella were detected (40%) and Campylobacter was present in minor amounts (2%). Almost one-third of the bacteria in the caeca at this age consisted of E. coli and Clostridium species.
At the age of 14 days, the relative proportion of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium increased and reached 40% of the total bacteria. In contrast, the relative proportion of Salmonella was reduced by approximately 10%. Campylobacter was present only in trace amounts and proportions of E. coli and Clostridium changed little.
At 25 days of age, almost one-half of the bacteria in the ceca were Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium species. Furthermore, the relative proportion of Salmonella had decreased by approximately 50% compared with that at 4 days. Proportions of Campylobacter remained small, whereas proportions of E. coli and Clostridium remained approximately 30%.
How much Probiotic to Supplement?
Supplementation of probiotic cultures should enable the beneficial colony in the gut to dominate the clostridial and other gut pathogens in terms of colonies. In normal conditions the chicken intestine hosts both beneficial and pathogenic or non-pathogenic strains of unwanted microflora also, with the ideal ratio being approximately 85% or more of friendly and 15% or less of unfriendly microflora. Unfortunately, in many cases, this ratio gets disturbed due to several stress factors. Many degenerative stress factors are also linked to bacterial imbalances.
Total bacterial population in the intestine
For optimum gut micro flora balance, the friendly bacteria such as gram positive Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria should dominate more than 85% of total bacteria
Probiotics for Hour-Old Chicks:
Newly hatched chicks have sterile gut and it will take few hours to few days to initialize and establish the optimal gut flora required. Immediately after hatch the chicks are to be transported to poultry farms which are located at different far away places from the hatchery. Reports from various researchers, it is found that Streptococcus and Enterococcus will only take about 24 hours for their multiplication, which are undesirable. But, for Lactobacilli and Bacillus, it will take 24-48 hours for the initiation of development and will take 21 days for the complete establishment in the gut, half of the life cycle in case of broilers. Providing beneficial bacterial colonies immediately after reaching the farm or even from the hatchery will enhance the performance of the birds. This is how, the first 24 hours of chick management is essential for its future performance, which is similar to that first week’s body weight that determines the body weight at the end of crop period. This indicates continuous provision of such type of beneficial colonies not only improves the performance of bird and profitability but also slowly reduces the pathogenic baterial population from the gut as well as environment.
Probiotics for Adult Birds:
This is as simple concept to maintain the beneficial colony population more than 85% in the total gut population. This helps to avoid unnecessary losses from sub-clinical issues and frequent outbreaks of enteric disorders and subsequent medicinal expenses.
Conclusion:
For the past four decades, antibiotics have been supplemented to animal and poultry feed to improve growth performance, efficiency and protect animals from adverse effects of pathogenic enteric microorganisms. The use of in-feed antibiotics has been practiced as one of the main strategies for controlling Clostridia, Salmonella and E.coli associated problems in poultry. But usage of non-therapeutic antibiotics in poultry feed are fast disappearing worldwide due to fear of development of antibiotic resistant microbes. Strategies to control these types of pathogenic micro-organisms in addition to antibiotic growth promoters have centered upon dietary and management practices. Supplementation of ideal concentration of beneficial bacterial colonies will enable the bird to perform to its potential by eliminating undesirable bacteria.
Broiler production in major countries is estimated to total 74,237,000 metric tons in 2009, 3.5% more than the 71,733,000 tons expected this year, according to data from USDA’s Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS).
Global egg production doubled between 1990 and 2005. By then, some 64 million tons of eggs were produced worldwide. Today there are approximately 4.93 billion egglaying hens in the world, each capable of producing up to 300 eggs per year. By 2015, world egg production is expected to reach 72 million tons, according to the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
At this point of time we should be highly thankful for superior genetic selection; the commercial poultry, both layer as well as broiler has undergone dramatic improvements in growth, feed efficiency and production. But at the same time due to its faster growth and high production efficiency, the modern poultry is highly vulnerable to acquire enteric pathogens as early as well. Gut health challenges are significant and most important issue for current poultry production. This may include viruses such as enterovirus, reovirus, rotavirus and other unnamed viruses, no need to mention the bacterial challenges (E. coli, Salmonella and Clostridium) and protozoal issues (Coccidia). More over with ever increasing feed cost, even one point lost in feed conversion or 0.01 % production drop will be a big economic challenge in long run for the commercial poultry producers in India even through the world. Some of us may be focusing much on very immediate returns on investment and failing to focus on long run profitability. Gut health issues can result in loss of feed conversion, uniformity, weight, rate of gain, exposure to common enteric pathogens, additional investment on treatment costs and higher condemnation rates. Therefore, early prevention of gut enteric challenges can result in significant savings.
As per recent estimates the approximate loss from a single bird due most common enteric disorders like Necrotic enteritis, Colibacillosis and Coccidiosis either clinically or sub-clinically are all put together is USD 10000-14000 per Lakh birds. At most times it is not less than USD 5000 – 6000 per lakh birds by either one or two causes. The causative agents like Enterococcus, Streptococcus and Staphylococcus are gaining access to entry even before the chicks receive their first drop of water at the farm. These causative organisms are ubiquitous in nature that is found in soil, dust, faeces, feed, poultry litter, and in intestinal contents (Ficken, M. D et al, 1997).
Although, small numbers of Clostridium perfringens, E. coli and other secondary bacterial pathogens are also commonly found in the intestinal tract of healthy broilers, but normally they may not cause clinical disease. Under normal conditions the beneficial bacteria (“good bacteria”) in the intestinal tract keep them under control i.e. small in number. However, when conditions change in the intestinal tract due to any sort of stress, the pathogens number will increase, toxins are produced and the clinical disease appears. While anything that causes intestinal irritation can lead to severe productive loss, like stress; sudden dietary changes; intestinal disease (worm infestation, coccidiosis); immune suppression etc., (Vijay. D et al, 2007).
In commercial farming operations, the sub-clinical course of disease may be most economically important form because it has been shown to impair feed conversion ratio and growth pattern in broilers (Stutz, H. W. et al, 1984) as well as production efficiency and growth pattern in layers. Like Salmonellosis, Colibacillosis infection plays a significant cost factor in poultry production not only in commercial operations but also in breeders through vertical transmission.
The sub-clinical infections like colibacillosis, necrotic enteritis is commonly seen in 2 to 5 weeks old broiler chickens raised on litter is accounts for USD 3000 – 4000 per lakh birds. Even in caged birds such as growers and layers the spread of these types of pathogens are very common and it results in 0.5-1.50% production loss throughout the life cycle (Vijay. D et al, 2007).
Prevention: Till date, for the prevention of losses from sub-clinical and clinical enteric disorders, the methods used by way of providing antibacterial feed additives, also referred to as antibiotic growth promoters, such as Virginiamycin, Lincomycin, Tylosin, Neomycin and Penicillin (Ficken, M. D. et al, 1997 and Stutz, H. W. et al, 1984). In recent years with the increase in export of eggs as well as frozen and ready to eat form of chicken preparations and the restrictions on the use of regular antibiotic feed supplements which hitherto are most successfully used to control the incidence of clinical and subclinical Necrotic Enteritis.
In consequence to this the occurrence of Necrotic Enteritis, Colibacillosis and some other non-specific enteritis has become epidemic in most part of the country in commercial flocks especially in broilers (25 to 40%). Keeping these things in mind, new strategies to be identified and adopted for the prevention and control of these unobserved losses.
As discussed earlier it has been documented that disturbances in the intestinal microflora leads to elevated levels of C. perfringens and Colibacilli (Fukata, T. et al, 1991). And it has been found that the pathogenic effects of these organisms could be reduced by feeding chicks as well as growers (which as more susceptible) and layers with optimally concentrated probiotic. Few other researchers also observed that the use of continuous competitive exclusion (CE) cultures of chicken intestinal flora (viable colonies) could reduce the incidence of clinical mortality and cecal colonization and prevent subclinical negative effects on body weight and feed efficiency in broiler chickens as well as production performance of layers (Elwinger, K., et al. 1992 and Hofacre, C. L., et al 1998).
Development of Bacterial Colonies in chicken Intestine:
The results of a recent study indicated that in young chicks the major species present in the small intestines and caeca was Lactobacilli, with a Bifidobacteria population becoming more dominant in the caeca at older age. Clostridium was detected in some segments of the small intestine in young chicks. In older chickens, Salmonella, Campylobacter, and E. coli species were found in the ceca.
During the first 2 to 4 days of post-hatch, Streptococci and Enterobacteria colonize the small intestine and caecum. After the first week, Lactobacillus predominate in the small intestine, and the caecum is colonized mainly by anaerobes (Bacteroides) and facultative anaerobes (Escherichia coli).
The study further reports about how the bacteria colonize in gut at different periods of chicken life;
In chicken caeca at 4 days, the relative proportion of Lactobacilli was about 25% of the total examined bacteria and Bifidobacterium was not detected. Relatively high proportions of Salmonella were detected (40%) and Campylobacter was present in minor amounts (2%). Almost one-third of the bacteria in the caeca at this age consisted of E. coli and Clostridium species.
At the age of 14 days, the relative proportion of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium increased and reached 40% of the total bacteria. In contrast, the relative proportion of Salmonella was reduced by approximately 10%. Campylobacter was present only in trace amounts and proportions of E. coli and Clostridium changed little.
At 25 days of age, almost one-half of the bacteria in the ceca were Lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium species. Furthermore, the relative proportion of Salmonella had decreased by approximately 50% compared with that at 4 days. Proportions of Campylobacter remained small, whereas proportions of E. coli and Clostridium remained approximately 30%.
How much Probiotic to Supplement?
Supplementation of probiotic cultures should enable the beneficial colony in the gut to dominate the clostridial and other gut pathogens in terms of colonies. In normal conditions the chicken intestine hosts both beneficial and pathogenic or non-pathogenic strains of unwanted microflora also, with the ideal ratio being approximately 85% or more of friendly and 15% or less of unfriendly microflora. Unfortunately, in many cases, this ratio gets disturbed due to several stress factors. Many degenerative stress factors are also linked to bacterial imbalances.
Total bacterial population in the intestine
For optimum gut micro flora balance, the friendly bacteria such as gram positive Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria should dominate more than 85% of total bacteria
Probiotics for Hour-Old Chicks:
Newly hatched chicks have sterile gut and it will take few hours to few days to initialize and establish the optimal gut flora required. Immediately after hatch the chicks are to be transported to poultry farms which are located at different far away places from the hatchery. Reports from various researchers, it is found that Streptococcus and Enterococcus will only take about 24 hours for their multiplication, which are undesirable. But, for Lactobacilli and Bacillus, it will take 24-48 hours for the initiation of development and will take 21 days for the complete establishment in the gut, half of the life cycle in case of broilers. Providing beneficial bacterial colonies immediately after reaching the farm or even from the hatchery will enhance the performance of the birds. This is how, the first 24 hours of chick management is essential for its future performance, which is similar to that first week’s body weight that determines the body weight at the end of crop period. This indicates continuous provision of such type of beneficial colonies not only improves the performance of bird and profitability but also slowly reduces the pathogenic baterial population from the gut as well as environment.
Probiotics for Adult Birds:
This is as simple concept to maintain the beneficial colony population more than 85% in the total gut population. This helps to avoid unnecessary losses from sub-clinical issues and frequent outbreaks of enteric disorders and subsequent medicinal expenses.
Conclusion:
For the past four decades, antibiotics have been supplemented to animal and poultry feed to improve growth performance, efficiency and protect animals from adverse effects of pathogenic enteric microorganisms. The use of in-feed antibiotics has been practiced as one of the main strategies for controlling Clostridia, Salmonella and E.coli associated problems in poultry. But usage of non-therapeutic antibiotics in poultry feed are fast disappearing worldwide due to fear of development of antibiotic resistant microbes. Strategies to control these types of pathogenic micro-organisms in addition to antibiotic growth promoters have centered upon dietary and management practices. Supplementation of ideal concentration of beneficial bacterial colonies will enable the bird to perform to its potential by eliminating undesirable bacteria.
Related topics:
Authors:
Neospark Drugs and Chemicals Pvt.Ltd
Recommend
Comment
Share
Microlabs
10 de agosto de 2017
Nice article Dr. I just want to know if any study has been done so far to establish a solid data file on gut ecosystem in poultry (stage wise)
Recommend
Reply
Soavet
29 de abril de 2009
Please, we need to see clinical trials with cost benefit effect of the use of probiotic in comparison with antibiotics for result output.
I think companies selling probiotic should report on this kind of trials.
African projects want to see this kind of practical empiric information in other to make commitment decision on reversal from antibiotics to probiotics.
PROBIOTIC SELLERS SHOULD SPONSOR THIS KIND OF EXPERIMENTAL TRIALS IN AFRICA AND THE OUTCOME OF SUCH RESULTS IF POSITIVE IN FAVOUR of probiotics will motivate poultry farmers in Africa to shift loyalty to the use of probiotics.
Otherwise most farmers in Africa may not relax their commitment to the use of synthetic antibiotics.
Adejoro
Recommend
Reply
17 de junio de 2009
Really informative article.
Recommend
Reply
Jadeed Group
30 de abril de 2009
The use of probiotics in poultry has proved its importance, I understand this could be one of the different means to minimize the use of antibiotics in poultry birds.
All the poultry production concerns should take initiatives to discourage or at least minimize the use of antibiotics by using probiotics and save the end consumers and the eco system.
Dr. Saadat Ali Changezi
Recommend
Reply
30 de abril de 2009
The hatcheries operator should be aware of this condition and take a very first move to inoculating probiotics to their hatched chicks.
Recommend
Reply
29 de abril de 2009
Dear Sirs,.
I have been following this discussion about this excellent article and I wanted to seize the opportunity to inform that the probiotics ECOBIOL and ECOBIOL PLUS, produced by NOREL&NATURE, are officially registered in European Union.
ECOBIOL is a sporulated, heat-resistant stable Bacillus originating from a non-emetic strain of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens.
ECOBIOL is a microorganism that produces huge quantity of enzymes (higher than Lactobacillus) and can set them free in vitro in the culture media and in vivo in the animal gut once it germinates. This fact allows the animals to obtain a higher degradability of the nutrients in the feed.
ECOBIOL produces protease and amylase enzymes. The degradation of starch and protein are therefore easily detectable in Agar-Starch and Agar-Gelatine mediums. These enzymatic activities are very important after weaning in the feed, the protein source is from vegetable origin, instead of casein coming from sow’s milk, and the animal gastrointestinal tract has to adapt to the new situation. The probiotic helps to this transition.
Besides, ECOBIOL is able to produce another type of extracellular enzymes like cellulases and xylanases.
ECOBIOL enhances lactic acid production, causing a severe in Intestine pH, which affects pathogenic bacteria and helps the pepsin activation.
ECOBIOL is also tolerant to several antibiotics such as Colistin, Amoxicillin, Oxytetracycline, Sulfamide, Tiamuline, Neomycin, Zinc Bacitracin or Avilamycine.
Finally, ECOBIOL can produce bacteriocins that help in controlling Clostridium perfringens, Escherichia coli or Salmonella. In vivo trials on broilers have shown that ECOBIOL helps controlling salmonella infection by reducing the Salmonella shedding in faeces as well as salmonella infection level at crop, caecum and liver. It has, therefore, a positive effect on bird health by preventing Salmonella colonization at both intestinal and systemic phases.
For further information do not hesitate to contact me.
Recommend
Reply
10 de marzo de 2009
The said article by Dr. S. Chandrasekar is a good informative tool that is helpful and the present need for poultry production, but for probiotics to be used as immunopotentiators, as many studies have suggested, there remain a number of questions that must be answered.
What are the most active strains and do they have the potential to be pathogenic?
What is the maximum dose?
When and how should the probiotic be delivered?
In my opinion, the easiest option is an in-feed delivery system.
Recommend
Reply
10 de marzo de 2009
Its in quite good article. Author has coverd most of areas pertaining to gut health and use of probiotics.
Thru' our experience, we would like to put farward that if we provide quality chicks, efficent brooding, temp, space, medicated water, proper ventilation and good feed made out of healthy raw materials, supplement with probiotic, the excellent results can be seen in terms of body wt, lower FCR and mimimum mortality.
Recommend
Reply
Guybro Chemical
10 de marzo de 2009
Potential of birds could only be highlited if gut health is better. Non-AGP like probiotic products with a good Acidifier which can acidify GI track content of poultry from Crop to Cloaca will definely give better profit to farmers.
In the interest of public health, indiscriminate use of antibiotic therapy and AGP in poultry diet should be discouraged.
Recommend
Reply
18 de febrero de 2009
This is an excellent article and gives some useful practical information. Use of probiotics for this purpose has given inconsistent results during last few years in poultry. In my view this may be attributed to stability of various preparations in feed and water rather than failure of the practice per se.
Recommend
Reply
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Poultry Industry
