Explore
Communities in English
Advertise on Engormix

Older Fans May Not Be Suitable for a Modern Tunnel House

Published: June 16, 2015
By: Dr. Mike Czarick and Dr. Brian D. Fairchild (University of Georgia)
As target bird sizes continue to increase so does the difficulty in keeping the birds cool during hot weather. Whereas 400 to 500 ft/min has traditionally worked well for smaller broilers, today’s larger 8 lb+ birds can require substantially higher air speeds to keep them growing during the summer months. Growers are often increasing their tunnel fan capacity 50% or more in their older houses to obtain air speeds of 600, 700, or even 800 ft/min. It is often not until a producer adds a modern tunnel fan to their house do they notice how much tunnel fans have changed, often making their older tunnel fans obsolete.
Older Fans May Not Be Suitable for a Modern Tunnel House - Image 1
Air velocity measurements were taken in a recently remodeled 40' X 500' broiler house (Figure 1). The dropped ceiling house was equipped with six, 1990's-era, 48" slant wall fans and seven modern 52" butterfly shutter fans with discharge cones. The average air speed was 550 ft/min (Figure 2) when only the seven 52" fans were operating. The total air moving capacity of the seven 52" fans was calculated to be 194,700 cfm by multiplying the average air speed (550 ft/min) by the cross-sectional area of the house (354 ft2 ). When the total air moving capacity of the fans (194,700 cfm) was divided by the number of fans (7) the average air moving capacity of each 52" fans was determined to be 27,814 cfm. When the six 1990's, 48" fans were added the average air speed increased 105 ft/min to 655 ft/min, which meant that the total air moving capacity of the tunnel fans increased by only 37,170 cfm or 6,195 cfm per 48" fan. The total air moved by the six additional 48" fans could have been replaced with a single new 52" fan!
Total house power usage was also measured during the air velocity testing. When all the fans were operating the total house power usage was 19.5 KW. When the six 48" fans were turned off power usage decreased to approximately14 KW, indicating that the six 48" fans were consuming approximately 5.5 KW of power or 0.92 KW per fan (Figure 3). Three of the 52" fans were turned off and the total house power usage decreased to 14.8 KW indicating they were each consuming approximately 1.76 KW of power. It is important to keep in mind that though the power usage of one of the 52" fans was a little over twice the power usage of one of the 48" fans, it was moving over four times the amount of air, making the 52" fans twice as energy efficient as the 48" fans! Another way to look at this - the six 48" fans only increased the air speed by approximately 16%, but total fan power usage increased by 31%!
Older Fans May Not Be Suitable for a Modern Tunnel House - Image 2
This particular farm provided a good example of the fact that when upgrading older tunnel-ventilated houses to higher tunnel air speeds it may prove advantageous to replace a houses’s older fans with modern ones. This is not to say that there are some older fans that cannot be used, but the performance of many older fans can suffer significantly under the higher static pressures commonly seen in houses where air speeds over 600 ft/min are being targeted. As air speed in a tunnel house increases so does the pressure the fans are working against. In the 90's the typical target air speed was relatively low (400 ft/min) and therefore the work/pressure the tunnel fans were under was relatively low (< 0.10"). Today, when many poultry operations are growing birds to over 8 lbs. the target air speeds have often been increased to over 700 ft/min which has resulted in static pressures often exceeding 0.15". Unlike many modern tunnel fans, many of the fans manufactured in the 90's were simply not designed to move air under such high static pressures. Comprehensive air velocity measurements taken on a number of farms has shown that the air moving capacity of a properly maintained 1990's 48" is typically between 10,000 and 15,000 cfm (@ 0.15"). When the belts and pulleys are worn and/or the shutter is dirty this can easily drop to below 10,000 cfm. As a result many of our older tunnel fans are not moving much more air than a modern 36" fan. One of the best ways to determine if an older tunnel fan is a good fit for house where high air speeds are targeted is to look at its air flow ratio. A fan’s air flow ratio is determined by dividing its air moving capacity at a very high static pressure (0.20") by its air moving capacity at a low a static pressure (0.05"). A tunnel fan’s air flow ratio along with other important performance information, can be found at the BESS Fan Laboratory website (www.bess.illinois.edu). Modern tunnel fans typically have an air flow ratio around 0.80, indicating that as pressure increases from 0.05" to 0.20" the air moving capacity of the fan will only decrease 20%. Though there are some older tunnel fans with similar air flow ratios, the problem is that there are some, as in the case above, that have air flow ratios below 0.70. This means that the air moving capacity of the fans will decrease 30% or more when working under high static pressures, making them poorly suited for use in high air velocity/high static pressure tunnel houses. A good indicator that your older tunnel fans may have a low air flow ratio is the tendency for their shutters to close when used in conjunction with modern tunnel fans. On the farm previously discussed, when six 48" fans were operating the static pressure was low (< 0.10") and the fan shutters were fully opened (Figure 4). When the seven 52" fans were also turned on the static pressure increased (>0.15") and the air moving capacity of the 48" fans was reduced to the point where the fan shutters were barely opening (Figure 5). It is not that the new fans were “robbing air” from the 48" fans, but rather due to the fact that the 48" fans were simply not able to move much air under the high static pressure generated when the seven 52" fans were turned on.
Older Fans May Not Be Suitable for a Modern Tunnel House - Image 3
When looking to add fans to your tunnel-ventilated house make sure you take a long hard look at your existing fans. Though they may have been “state of the art” when they were installed, the fact is that like our birds, tunnel fans have changed substantially over the last 20 years. Purchasing all new fans for a house can represent a substantial investment, but in some cases it may prove to be a very good way to maximize both bird performance and your farm’s energy efficiency in the long run.

This project was funded in part through a grant provided by the U.S. and Poultry & Egg Association
This article was originally published at UGA Cooperative Extension Poultry Housing Tips Vol. 27 no. 3, 2015. Engormix.com thanks the authors for this contribution. 
Related topics
Authors:
Mike Czarick
University of Georgia
Follow
Dr. Brian D. Fairchild
University of Georgia
Follow
Join to be able to comment.
Once you join Engormix, you will be able to participate in all content and forums.
* Required information
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Create a post
Mike Czarick
University of Georgia
22 de junio de 2015
There really no direct relationship between the number of fan blades and efficiency, air moving capacity, air flow ratio, etc. The only accurate way you can determine fan performance factors is through a fan performance test laboratory. Mike Czarick
The sheikh
19 de junio de 2015
I hope that i have found in best of your health............ i just wanted to ask 1 question that is there any strong relation between the no. of blades a fan has and the efficiency of that fan??????
Senthil Kumar Krishnan
17 de junio de 2015
We installed largest deep litter shed in India (source of supply from GSA). First batch itself we are getting poor performance in production and hatchbility. Please suggest how to improve our production. Thanks in advance
Waqar
17 de junio de 2015
Dear Dr Czarick Dr Fairchild A new breed of fans have arrived here now manufactured and supplied by Danish and other companies based on Brushless DC (BLDC) motor and inverter ( three phase controlled ). They are much more energy efficient compared to any three phase AC fan presently available in the market. Added advantage is they are direct drive so no change of RPM over time due to worn out belt.Speed can be varied at will due to inverter. There is no change of RPM due to voltage drop, specially here, in hot summer months, again due to use of inverter. They have a long service life due to all plastic cone and propellers made of modern UV treated polymer HDPE( high Density Polyethelene ). I do not know whether they have entered US market. May be you have come accross them and their testing may be in the pipeline.Will you pls comment. Perhaps these companies were were present on ATLANTA Poultry expo. N.B.They claim they have already sumitted the fans for BESS labs testing report Waqar
Senthil Kumar Krishnan
17 de junio de 2015
Thanks for sharing wonderful article! How to increase better productivity? We are facing LOT of difficulty to produce better result in deep litter. How to maintain ventilation management in less humidity area? Pl suggest
Dr. Mohammad Akram
17 de junio de 2015
Dear Dr. Mike Czarick & Dr. Brian D. Fairchild, Thanks for your informative article on air speed. Replacement of old fans with new is an efficient but expensive way of increasing air speed of broiler poultry house. Pl. give your expert opinion on use of tunnel doors in high humidity areas to reduce wet litter and increase air speed with properly maintained old fans. Best regards Dr. M. Akram, Consultant Microbiologist, Micro Laboratories, Karachi, Pakistan
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.
LoginRegister