Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

Protecting animals from ingested mycotoxins

Published: October 26, 2020
By: Julia Dvorska, Global scientific and technical manager Mycotoxin Management at Adisseo
What should we do if we have implemented all 3 of the 4 steps of the Mycotoxin Management Program – Forecast Crop Contamination, Secure Storage and Screen finished feed – and still find a multiple mycotoxin contamination in the feed? What if we do not have any choice in the matter, as animals need to be fed?  We can try to avoid feeding such a feed to more sensitive species and age groups, although even low levels of mycotoxins can have negative effects on animals.
Swine are the most sensitive animals to mycotoxins
Pigs are generally the most sensitive farm animals to mycotoxins. Aflatoxins suppress the immune system, and the first sign of aflatoxin contamination in a diet is a decreased feed intake. Clinical signs, which depend on the contamination level, can range from reduced growth and hepatosis to death. Deoxynivalenol and T-2 toxin are among the most relevant trichothecenes for the pig industry, and both inhibit feed intake. Deoxynivalenol also decreases the growth rate of pigs and causes vomiting, whenever it is fed at high levels. Ochratoxins are hepatotoxic and nephrotoxic and cause other particular chronic toxicities. The effects of ochratoxin intoxication are reduced growth, a decreased weight gain and renal lesions. Zearalenone mainly causes estrogenic effects in pigs, and it increases the occurrence of abortions and stillbirths in pregnant sows. Feeds contaminated with zearalenone induce swelling and reddening of the vulva, false heats and false pregnancies in other animals. Fumonisins target the liver, lungs and pancreas and cause pulmonary oedema in pigs.
Ruminants are affected the most by aflatoxins, trichothecenes and zearalenone
Aflatoxins, trichothecenes and zearalenone are equally as important for young ruminants as they are for monogastric animals. However, mature ruminants are generally more resistant to the effects of some mycotoxins than monogastric animals. This is due to the mycotoxin detoxification ability of some rumen microbes. Among the most common mycotoxins, aflatoxins, trichothecenes and zearalenone are of particular importance for cows. The clinical signs of the ingestion of aflatoxin contaminated feeds include reduced feed consumption and milk production, diarrhoea, acute mastitis, weight loss, respiratory disorders, hair loss, liver damage and immune suppression. The aflatoxin metabolite AFM1 is carried over into the milk at around 1 to 6% of the amount of the aflatoxin consumed. Numerous studies have shown that ruminants are affected less by deoxynivalenol (DON) because it is metabolised into its less toxic de-epoxyde in the rumen. Nevertheless, DON is associated with a reduced feed intake and lower milk production in dairy cattle, mainly due to its effects on rumen microflora when exposed long-term. T-2 toxin results in a loss of appetite and weight, a slower growth, gastroenteritis, a lowered milk production, and a reduced immune response in calves. In addition, T-2 toxin has been implicated in the haemorrhagic bowel syndrome as it impairs the immune function. Among other things, zearalenone causes abnormal reproductive processes in cattle, sheep and other ruminants, which can result in false heats, anoestrus, premature mammary development and abortions.
Poultry show disparities, according to the species, but high sensitivity to mycotoxins
Poultry are sensitive to many mycotoxins, which can result in several toxic effects. Broiler chickens are affected less by aflatoxins than other kinds of poultry, such as ducks, geese and turkeys. Aflatoxins are by far the most immunosuppressive toxins. Type A trichothecenes (T- toxin, HT-2 toxin, diacetoxyscripenol) are of major concern for poultry industries, and cause economic losses in productivity. They are highly toxic for poultry, but especially for chickens, due to their very low LD50. T-2 toxin reduces feed intake, the body weight, the quality of breeding eggs and can cause oral lesions. Young chicks and turkey poults are highly sensitive to ochratoxins. These nephrotoxins can suppress feed intake, growth and egg production, and can result in a poor egg shell quality. Fumonisins are associated with spiking mortality in poultry. The signs of dietary fumonisin are immune suppression, decreased body weight and average daily weight gain, as well as an increased gizzard weight, although the dietary levels must be really high to cause such symptoms. In comparison to other species, such as pigs, poultry appear to be affected less by zearalenone, although combinations of mycotoxins might cause significant losses in fertility and hatchability.
Mycotoxin deactivators with multi-modes of action are key to protecting livestock animals
The addition of mycotoxin sequestrants to mycotoxin contaminated diets has been considered the most promising dietary approach to reduce the negative effect of mycotoxins. The theory behind this is that the binder or the deactivator neutralizes the mycotoxins by adsorbing them to a great extent or inactivating them in the feeds during the passage of the feeds through the gastrointestinal tract, thereby preventing toxic interactions and the absorption of mycotoxins along the digestive tract. This is a very effective way of combating certain mycotoixns, and aflatoxin B1 in particular. This approach is therefore seen as a preventive approach rather than a therapy. Trichothecenes are less adsorbable toxins, and as such, products with a different mode of action need to be used to deactivate them.
A variety of microbial species, including bacteria, yeast and fungi have been recognized for their ability to biotransform mycotoxins into less toxic metabolites (for example, some Bacillus and Clostridia spp or some yeasts ) or bind certain mycotoxins, such as Lactobacilli. Therefore, any naturally present gastro-intestinal microflora and biologically active substances in the body can inactivate mycotoxins. Additionally, the host cells (some intestinal cells, hepatocytes, macrophages) can also transform or inactivate some mycotoxins to non-toxic metabolites, and this is another powerful natural defense mechanism that protects animals from toxins. Our task, at this stage of mycotoxin risk management, is to help the animal body to activate or enhance its natural ability to neutralize any ingested mycotoxins.
Some mycotoxins are absorbed very quickly through the gastrointestinal wall, and they therefore escape binding to the indigestible adsorbent or to a bio-inactivating agent. Any absorbed mycotoxins will damage their target organs. Most mycotoxins cause organ damage: aflatoxin B1 – damages the liver, ochratoxin A the kidneys, trichothecenes the epithelium of the gastro-intestinal tract, fumonisins the lungs, while zearalenone damages the reproductive tract. An animal needs support in metabolizing and detoxifying the mycotoxin outside the gut, and it is therefore necessary to cope with the secondary effects of ‘digested’ mycotoxins through other means.
Protecting animals from ingested mycotoxins - Image 1
One of the key mechanisms of action of several mycotoxins is that of inducing oxidative stress, which in turn impairs the antioxidant and immune systems. This mechanism is usually underestimated, but even low levels of mycotoxins, with no visible effects on the performance of animals, can decrease the immune competence. Vaccination failures (significantly decreased antibodies titers) and veterinary treatment failures (coccidiosis, necrotic enteritis etc) are therefore witnessed. In order to help animals to combat this negative effect, we should consider using ingredients with proven effects against oxidative stress caused by mycotoxins.
Protecting animals from ingested mycotoxins - Image 2













We at Adisseo believe that only a holistic approach ensures the maximum effect against mycotoxins when the aim is to protect animals.
Related topics:
Authors:
 Julia dvorska
Adisseo
Influencers who recommended :
Ricardo Hume
Recommend
Comment
Share
Peetambar Dahal
UC Davis - University of California
UC Davis - University of California
1 de febrero de 2021

Agreed with Akos above.
After proposing preharvest interventions (https://doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02528), the authors have taken the approach to improve feed quality (https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11100565). Both of these approaches were published in this forum. Regarding field fungus like Fusarium, similar preventive approaches need to be pursued. Downstream maintenance of value chain would further require maintenance of moisture to avoid insect infestation and nutrient losses. Even fortified foods/feeds lose nutrients at high moisture content. Until above approaches are used, mycotoxin absorbents should be continued.

Recommend
Reply
Akos Mesterhazy
Cereal Research Non-Profit Ltd.,Hungary
Cereal Research Non-Profit Ltd.,Hungary
5 de enero de 2021

I think that the best way is the prevention of the preharvest contamination. When you see the latest (4th) edition of Compendium of corn diseases, Aspergillus flavus was reclassified as mainly of field origin. From the Fusarium spp. this is not new. Most of the wheat and maize genotypes produce toxin contamination proportional with the visual severity, but a changing rate 10-20 % show overproduction or lower toxin rate, governed possibly by other mechanisms. As there are 10-fold or larger differences between genotypes, this can be used for restriction of the susceptible genotypes. This can significantly decrease the toxin pressure. A smaller toxin concentration can be neutralized with a much higher efficacy with a reducing method. When a consequent breeding program is made, you might have a very significant progress at low additional costs.
Greetings, and I wish you a successful application.
A. Mesterhazy

Recommend
Reply
Joe Magadi
UFAC
UFAC
8 de diciembre de 2020
Would combining a mycotoxin binder with selenium and vit E help with the oxidative stress?
Recommend
Reply
dr murad ali
12 de enero de 2021

We would have to prevent our animal from fungus growth feed. It cause huge problem to milking animal .toxicity having harm effect on animal. We must use toxin binder on daily basis to prevent Rumen and intestinal toxicity

Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Pig Industry
Sriraj Kantamneni
Sriraj Kantamneni
Cargill
Global Business Technology Director
United States
Francis Simard
Francis Simard
Trouw Nutrition
Agr., M. Sc. / Nutrition and Development Director at Trouw Nutrition Canada
United States
Tom Frost
Tom Frost
DSM-Firmenich
Director of Innovation & Application
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.