Hell Antrison,
The first 7-10 days represent a period of rapid development of the gastrointestinal tract. We have assessed this as part of our studies on SDPP. The product positively affects this development, which then tends to have an effect on subsequent growth and FCR. It is therefore worthwhile including SDPP in starter or pre-starter diets, a period during which feed consumption is also low. I do not think it will be economical feeding it throughout the production cycle, and in any case, does not seem to be necessary.
I would add that our studies were on a small scale and in cages. One study that was conduced on litter (also small-scale) did not show such extensive improvement in response. I think it will be worthwhile testing different dietary formulations and also a larger study on litter.
Thanks for all the comments. Dr Santander is right, SDPP would be safer than most other animal products in view of its preparation. There have been issues with pigs, now being linked to a viral infection in piglets. This is likely because some SDPP is of porcine origin. I think this will be of benefit to the poultry industry - if the pig industry does not use SDPP, then the price will drastically reduce. Currently, it sells for about $A8000 per tonne in Australia. We have done several other experiments, to be published soon. We found that it could be fed at 0.05 % rather than 1 % and can be fed for 5 rather than 10 days, to achieve the same benefits. The cost of feed per unit BWG is also lower with SDPP than without it.
Paul