Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

Effect of amino acid levels during broiler breeder pullet rearing on: 1. Growth and development

Published: December 16, 2019
By: Andres Ortiz 1,2; Edgar Oviedo-Rondon 1; Ivan Ospina 1; Hernan Cordova 1; Viviana San Martin 1; Camila Alfaro 1,2; Gustavo Quintana 1,2; Ivan Cardenas 1,2; Miguel Chico 1; Yilmar Matta 1,2; Lina Penuela 1,2; Justina Caldas 3. / 1 North Carolina State University; 2 Universidad del Tolima; 3 Cobb Vantress Inc.
Adequate pullet nutrition is essential to obtain the BW and development suitable for reproduction. An experiment was conducted to determine the effects of four amino acid (AA) dietary levels fed to broiler breeder pullets during the rearing phase from 5 to 24wk on BW, abdominal fat deposition and development. A total of 1,360 Cobb-500 slow-feathering (SF) pullets were placed in 16 floor pens (85/pen). Up to 4wk all pullets were fed one starter diet in crumbles and after 29d of age fed with four mash grower diets containing 4 AA levels (0.40, 0.54, 0.60, and 0.66% of dLys with balanced protein) and 2,700 kcal/kg ME. From 16wk to 5% egg production, developer mash diets with 2,800 kcal/kg ME and 0.51, 0.57, 0.63, and 0.69% of dLys were offered. Feed amounts varied slightly (±3 g/d) among treatments in the developer phase to maintain BW close (±2%) to Cobb guideline. Individual BW was obtained at 4, 10, 15, 20 and 25wk of age. At these days 3 pullets per pen were selected, sacrificed and breast muscle with bones, liver, abdominal fat and intestines were collected and shanks measured. Fleshing scores were assessed at 11, 16, 21 and 25wk of age and shank length measured. Data was analyzed in a CRD with 4 AA treatments and 4 replicate pens each. One-way ANOVA and regression analyses were conducted. Results indicated no differences in BW (P > 0.05) at 4 wk. The two higher AA levels resulted in heavier (P < 0.01) pullets throughout the experimental phase being 2.4 and 3.6% above Cobb guideline at 20wk, while the other two levels were 0.6 and 0.4% below. At 16, 20 and 21wk of age pullets fed diets with the highest AA level resulted in greater (P < 0.05) relative breast muscle weight or fleshing score and shorter shanks as compared with pullets fed diets with the lowest AA levels. Pullets fed the lowest dietary AA level had the longest (P < 0.05) intestines at 10wk of age, the largest deposits of abdominal fat at 15 and 25wk, and the smallest liver at 20wk. Fleshing increased linearly (P < 0.01), while abdominal fat and shank length decreased (P < 0.05) as AA increased. In conclusion, AA dietary levels have important effects on pullet BW, fleshing, abdominal fat and organ development during rearing, but the best egg production was observed with the two highest AA levels.
Key Words: amino acids, pullet breeders, growth, development, breast muscle.
 
Abstract presented at the International Poultry Scientific Forum 2019 in Atlanta, USA.
Related topics:
Authors:
Edgar O. Oviedo-Rondón
North Carolina State University - NCSU
North Carolina State University - NCSU
Iván Camilo Ospina-Rojas
CJ Bio
Hernan Alejandro Córdova
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
Viviana San Martin
North Carolina State University - NCSU
North Carolina State University - NCSU
Lina María Peñuela
Universidad de Tolima - Colombia
Universidad de Tolima - Colombia
Justina Caldas
Aviagen
Show more
Recommend
Comment
Share
Jacky Michard
Hubbard breeders
3 de enero de 2020

Your study confirms that pullets fed the lowest dietary AA level had the largest deposits of abdominal fat at end of rearing and onset of lay. So this is supposed to help average sexual maturity of your experimental flock. Is the low dietary AA level in rearing results in earlier sexual maturity? Higher early egg size? Better peak of lay?
Or is the low dietary AA level in rearing had positive or negative results in persistency of lay?

Thanks and Regards.

Jacky Michard
Poultry consultant

Recommend
Reply
Juarez Donzele
Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV
Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV
21 de diciembre de 2019

Dr Edgar, the results of your study are consistent. As it is normal for birds to vary in body weight in the experimental unit, I think it would be more correct to select the 3 birds with the body weight closest to the average weight of the experimental unit. This practice would avoid slaughtering birds of unrepresentative weight. Because you used regression, because you didn't set the level that gave the best results, instead of citing the two highest levels.

Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Poultry Industry
Annie Kneedler
Annie Kneedler
Cargill
United States
Shivaram Rao
Shivaram Rao
Pilgrim´s
PhD Director Principal de Nutrición y Servicios Técnicos de Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation
United States
Karen Christensen
Karen Christensen
Tyson
Tyson
PhD, senior director of animal welfare at Tyson Foods
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.