Aged laying hens are exposed to oxidative stress which can contribute to liver damage. This study aimed to investigate the effects of methionine (Met) sources (DL-Met and DL-2-hydroxy-4- (methylthio)-butanoic acid (OH-Met)), Met levels (100, 110, and 120% of breeding company recommendation) and alpha-tocopherol (VE) levels (20 and 40 IU) supplementation on liver functioning in 70 wk aged laying hens. Met source and level interaction had significant effect on liver index (P < 0.01) along with significant interaction effect of Met source and VE level (P < 0.01). Further, OH-Met reduced liver fat percentage compared with DL-Met (P < 0.01). Met sources had no effect on liver Triglycerides (TG) and total cholesterol (TC) but Met level significantly affected TG (P < 0.05) with Met source and level interaction (P < 0.01), however, lower VE level reduced TC in liver (P < 0.05). Met source and Met level influenced superoxide dismutase (SOD), while catalase activities (CAT) was influenced by Met level only (P < 0.05). It was found that OH-Met at 110% level significantly increased SOD compared with other Met levels. DL-Met at 100% level and OH-Met at 110% exhibited higher CAT activities (P < 0.05). DL-Met at 110% level and OH-Met at 100% showed significant reduction of malonaldehyde (MDA; P < 0.05). Further, OH-Met significantly increased mRNA gene expression of glutathione synthase (GSS) and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor (Nrf2) compared with the DL-Met group (P<0.05). A higher number of normal livers were found at 100 % OH-Met with 20 IU VE supplementation. Taken together, this research demonstrates that the liver health of aged laying hens was slightly improved by OH-Met through enhanced hepatic antioxidative functions.




Agostini, P. S., Dalibard, P., Mercier, Y., van der Aar, P., & van der Klis, J. D. (2016). Poultry Science, 95, 560–569.
Cadenas, E., & Davies, K. J. A. (2000). Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 29, 222–230.
Gu, Y. F., Chen, Y. P., Jin, R., Wang, C., Wen, C., & Zhou, Y. M. (2021). Poultry Science, 100, 100949.
Jankowski, J., Ognik, K., Kubinska, M., Czech, A., Juskiewicz, J., & Zdunczyk, Z. (2017). Poultry Science, 96, 3229–3238.
Li, Y., Mei, H., Liu, Y., Li, Z., Qamar, H., Yu, M., & Ma, X. (2023). Foods, 12, 2302.
Lugata, J. K., Ortega, S. V., & Csaba, S. (2022). Agriculture, 12, 1701.
Madeira, M. S., Palmeira, M. M., Costa, F. G., Gomes, P. C., Ferreira, M. A., Lopes, P. A. A., Santos, C. E., Alfaia, M. M., & Prates, A. M. (2018). Poultry Science, 97, 2591–2599.
Mazur-Kusnirek, M., Antoszkiewicz, Z., Lipinski, K., Kaliniewicz, J., & Kotlarczyk, S. (2019). Archives of Animal Breeding, 62, 287–296.
Pomatto, L. C., & Davies, K. J. A. (2018). Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 124, 420–430.
Ponnampalam, E. N., Kiani, A., Santhiravel, S., Holman, W. B., Lauridsen, C., & Dunshea, F. R. (2022). Animals, 12, 3279.
Ruan, D., Fouad, A. M., Fan, Q., Xia, W., Wang, S., Chen, W., Lin, C., Wang, Y., Yang, L., & Zheng, C. (2018). British Journal of Nutrition, 119, 121–130.
Surai, P. F., Kochish, I. I., Fisinin, V. I., & Kidd, M. T. (2019). Antioxidants, 8, 235.
Wang, J., Yang, G., Zhang, K., Ding, X., Bai, S., & Zeng, Q. (2019). Poultry Science, 98, 341–349.
Zhang, S., Gilbert, E. R., Saremi, B., & Wong, E. A. (2018). Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 102, 1274–1283.
