Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix
Evonik Animal Nutrition
Content sponsored by:
Evonik Animal Nutrition

Effects of balancing low protein diets with supplemental amino acids on performance and carcass composition of growing-finishing pigs

Published: December 14, 2018
By: Dr. John Htoo, Evonik Nutrition & Care GmbH, Animal Nutrition, Germany
Conclusions
  • Reducing the dietary crude protein (CP) level and balancing with supplemental amino acids (AA) maintained optimal performance and carcass quality of growing-finishing pigs compared with feeding high CP diet.
  • Plasma urea nitrogen concentration decreased linearly when dietary CP was reduced, indicating a better balanced AA supply with less excessive AA being Nitrogen (N) retention (g/d) was not affected but the urinary and total N excretions were markedly reduced by 32 and 28 %, respectively by lowering the CP level from 16.1 to 12.4 % in late Finisher diet.
  • Lowering dietary CP level by replacing soybean meal with supplemental AA is possible to maintain optimal pig performance and carcass quality when diets are balanced for adequate levels of standardized ileal digestible AA, essential AA:total N ratio and net energy.
Introduction and Objective
Increasing public awareness of environmental pollution demands that today’s animal producers are paying attention not only to optimal productivity but also minimizing N excretion. Research showed that 1 %-unit dietary CP reduction results in roughly 8 % less N excretion in growing-finishing pigs (Kerr, 2003). Thus, lowering dietary CP level is an effective means to improve the efficiency of N utilization. An unwanted impact of feeding high CP diets is that it increases hindgut microbial fermentation and proliferation of pathogenic bacteria which promotes the incidence of diarrhea in weaned pigs. Thus, reducing dietary CP can improve the gut health of weaned pigs.
Currently, L-Val in a feed-grade form is available in the market (in addition to Lys, Met, Thr and Trp), and L-Ile has been permitted for use in the European Union. This gives nutritionists more flexibility to further reduce the dietary CP level, and take advantage of using less costly raw materials to improve overall profitability. Research has proven that reducing the CP level up to 4 %-units from 20.0 to 16.0 % CP (Le Bellego et al., 2002) and balancing the diets to meet all essential AA (EAA) on standardized ileal digestible (SID) and net energy (NE) basis had no detrimental effect on performance of grower-finisher pigs. However, a reduced performance was observed when the dietary CP level was reduced greater than 4 %-units (Guay et al., 2006; Yue and Qiao, 2008) although diets in both studies were balanced to meet SID EAA requirements.
Sufficient intake of non-essential AA (NEAA) is a quantitatively important part of total protein intake and the proportion of NEAA N:total dietary N can significantly affect animal performance (Heger et al., 1998). Containing an insufficient amount of N from NEAA may be one of the limiting factors affecting the performance of pigs when extremely low CP diets are fed. Thus, the objective of this experiment, conducted at the swine research facility of the University of Applied Sciences Bingen, Germany, was to evaluate the effects of balancing low CP diets with supplemental AA and maintaining optimal essential AA:total N ratio on performance and carcass composition of growing-finishing (24-110 kg) pigs.
Experimental design
A 83-day (d) growth trial was conducted with 180 TOPIGS pigs [initial body weight (BW) of 24.4 ± 2.0 kg] with 2 pigs per pen and 18 pens (9 barrow pens and 9 gilt pens) per treatment. Pigs were blocked by BW and assigned to 5 diets based on corn, barley, soybean meal (SBM) and rapeseed meal for each of the Grower 1 (24-40 kg, d 0-18), Grower 2 (40-60 kg, d 19-39), Finisher 1 (60-80 kg, d 40-61) and Finisher 2 (80-110 kg, d 62-83) phases. For each phase, the high CP diet (diet A) and low CP (diet E; without SBM) were initially formulated without inclusion of free AA. Diets B, C and D were produced by blending diets A and E in varying proportion (75, 50 and 25 % of diet A).
Effects of balancing low protein diets with supplemental amino acids on performance and carcass composition of growing-finishing pigs - Image 1
Ingredients and all diets were analyzed for total AA content, and supplemental AA were then added to the diets on the basis of SID AA (AMINODat® 4.0) corrected for the analyzed AA content to meet AA recommendation (Table 1; Evonik, 2009). As shown in Table 2, dietary CP was reduced linearly from diet A through E by step-wise reduction of SBM inclusion (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 %). Additional AA (Gly, Pro, Glu, His, Phe) were supplemented in diets D and E of Grower 1 and 2 phases to balance the EAA:total N ratio to be approximately 50 % (Heger et al., 1998). Additional L-Arg was added in diet E to contain a similar Arg level like in diet C of Grower 1 and 2 phases (Tables 1 and 2). All diets were balanced for a similar NE content (Table 1).
Effects of balancing low protein diets with supplemental amino acids on performance and carcass composition of growing-finishing pigs - Image 2
Effects of balancing low protein diets with supplemental amino acids on performance and carcass composition of growing-finishing pigs - Image 3
The analyzed AA contents in the experimental diets were close to the calculated values indicating that diets were mixed properly (Table 3). Pig BW and feed intake were recorded during each phase. After 83 d of growth trial, pigs further received Finisher 2 diets until they reached slaughter BW of approximately 117 kg. Pigs were slaughtered at a commercial slaughter facility, and 10 pigs from treatment A, B, D and E (6 barrows and 4 gilts) and 9 pigs (5 barrows and 4 gilts) from treatment C were selected for carcass evaluation. On trial d 95, 6 barrows per treatment were selected to collect blood to determine plasma urea N (PUN) concentration.
Additionally, a 5-d N-balance trial was conducted by feeding Finisher 2 diets A (16.1 % CP) or E (12.4 % CP) to measure the effect of dietary CP on N excretion. Finisher barrows (average BW of 111.3 ± 3.4 kg; 3 pigs per treatment) were fed restricted at 2.0 kg/d. After a 7-d adaptation period, a total collection of feces and urine were undertaken for 5 days.
Results and discussion
During each phase and the overall 83-d period, average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) as well as final BW, were not affected by lowering the CP content and balancing with AA in the diets (P > 0.05; Table 4; Figure 1). Overall, feeding the lowest CP diet (diet E; without SBM) resulted in 30 g less ADG (886 vs. 916 g/d) but FCR was improved by 3.3 % (2.33 vs. 2.41) compared with the high CP diet (diet A).
In this study, inclusion level of SBM was gradually reduced from a “high” to “zero” inclusion level in diet A to E, and consequently lowered dietary CP by approximately 3 to 23 % on a relative basis, but pig performance was not affected when diets were balanced to meet requirement on SID AA and NE basis coupled with maintaining maximum EAA:total N ratio. A reduced performance was reported when dietary CP was reduced greater than 4 %-units from 16.0 to 10.1 % CP in 37-61 kg growing pigs (Guay et al., 2006) or from 23.1 to 17.2 % CP in 7-11 kg weaned piglets (Yue and Qiao, 2008) despite the fact that diets were balanced to meet for EAA on SID basis. A closer look at diet composition used in these studies revealed that lowering CP resulted in markedly reduced levels of NEAA which may have been insufficient to synthesis EAA.
Effects of balancing low protein diets with supplemental amino acids on performance and carcass composition of growing-finishing pigs - Image 4
Plasma urea N concentration (d 95) decreased linearly (P < 0.001) when dietary CP content was reduced from diet A to diet E (Table 5). This indicates that when dietary CP is reduced and AA are supplemented the dietary AA profile is closer to ideal protein ratio, and less excessive AA are being degraded in the body.
Effects of balancing low protein diets with supplemental amino acids on performance and carcass composition of growing-finishing pigs - Image 5
There were no differences (P > 0.05) among dietary treatments in terms of dressing percentage, lean meat percentage and back fat thickness (Table 5), which demonstrated that reducing dietary CP levels does not affect the carcass characteristics when diets are formulated on the same SID AA and NE basis.
Effects of balancing low protein diets with supplemental amino acids on performance and carcass composition of growing-finishing pigs - Image 6
As shown in Table 6, the daily N retained (g/d) was not affected (P > 0.05) but the urinary N excretion was reduced by 32 % from 32.8 to 22.2 g/d (P = 0.01) by lowering the CP from 16.1 to 12.4 % in Finisher 2 diet. As urinary N is the main route of N excretion in pigs, the total N excretion was also reduced by 28 % (P < 0.01) by lowering the CP level in Finisher 2. This equates to 7.4 % less N excretion by 1 %-unit dietary CP reduction confirming the previous estimate by Kerr (2003).
Effects of balancing low protein diets with supplemental amino acids on performance and carcass composition of growing-finishing pigs - Image 7
In conclusion, lowering dietary CP level by replacing SBM with supplemental AA allows to maintain optimal pig performance when diets are balanced for adequate SID AA and NE, and an EAA:total N ratio of not greater than 50 % is maintained to ensure that the diet is not deficient in NEAA. Furthermore, low CP, AA-supplemented diets deliver abetter balanced AA supply to pigs resulting a markedly reduced N excretion and reduced impact of live production on the environment.
Source:
Htoo, J. K., J. Trautwein, J. Gao, and G. Dusel. 2013. Feeding low protein, AA-fortified diets did not affect performance and carcass composition of growing-finishing pigs. The 4th International Symposium on Energy and Protein Metabolism and Nutrition. September 9-12, Sacramento, USA.

AMINODat® 4.0. Platinum version, 2010. Evonik Degussa GmbH, Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany.

Evonik (2009): Recommendations for Swine (www.aminoacidsandmore.com).

Guay, F., S. M. Donovan and N. L. Trottier (2006): Biochemical and morphological developments are partially impaired in intestinal mucosa from growing pigs fed reduced-protein diets supplemented with crystalline amino acids. J. Anim. Sci. 84:1749-1760.

Heger, J., S. Mengesha and D. Vodehnal (1998): Effect of essential: total nitrogen ratio on protein utilization in the growing pig. British J. Nutr. 80:537-544.
Kerr, B. J., 2003. Dietary manipulation to reduce environmental impact. 9th International symposium on digestive physiology in pigs. Banff, AB, Canada. Vol. 1; 139-142.

Le Bellego, L. J. van Milgen, and J. Noblet. 2002. Effect of high temperature and low protein diets on the performance of growing-finihing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 80:691-701.

Yue, L.Y. and S.Y. Qiao (2008): Effects of low-protein diets supplemented with crystalline amino acids on performance and intestinal development in piglets over the first 2 weeks after weaning. Livestock Sci. 115:144-152.

Related topics:
Authors:
John Htoo
Evonik Animal Nutrition
Evonik Animal Nutrition
Influencers who recommended :
Victor Naranjo Haro, Caroline Gonzalez-Vega
Recommend
Comment
Share
Juarez Donzele
Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV
Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV
12 de enero de 2019

My position was that in practical conditions where immunological challenges are greatest, and consequently the demand for a certain pool of amino acids is considered to be non-essential and increased, the possibility of protein reduction of the feed is limited.

In addition to this, it should be considered that gastrointestinal digestion of protein sources produces a variety of peptides with functional action that may favor the animal.

Recommend
Reply
Juarez Donzele
Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV
Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV
9 de enero de 2019

Excellent work, even with results consistent with those that we verified in research that we conducted evaluating the reduction of protein in pig rations at different stages of production. However, I would like to make a few points which I consider relevant. First - it is important to consider that in the environment in the production unit, the animals are normally exposed to greater immunological challenge. In this case, protein reduction may compromise animal performance, since the reduction of non-essential amino acids, such as glutamate, aspartate, glycine, glutamine, by its recognized actions in the immune system, may limit the defense system of animals and consequently their performance. Second, it is known that the digestion of soy protein results in the production of various peptides, which are functional, with the action, for example, of increasing the phagocytic capacity of neutrophils.

Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users
Alessandra Ferraz
Alessandra Ferraz
Evonik Animal Nutrition
Evonik Animal Nutrition
United States
Anita Menconi
Anita Menconi
Evonik Animal Nutrition
Evonik Animal Nutrition
Regional Technical Marketing Director - Evonik
United States
Monique Lesser
Monique Lesser
Evonik Animal Nutrition
Evonik Animal Nutrition
Digital Marketing and eBusiness Lead
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.