Content sponsored by:
Phileo by Lesaffre
Optimising pellet processing to boost pellet quality and profitability
Published: March 19, 2020
By: Mohamed MAMMERI, Global Product Manager, Phileo by Lesaffre
The production of pelleted feed is a complex and expensive activity. Optimising the manufacturing process is therefore important to maintain production profitability, making it necessary to collect all relevant data along the processing chain. It is also essential to understand the parameters that affect the pelleting process. Evaluation needs to address three key factors: pellet quality, animal productivity and energy consumption. To do this, it is necessary to have a suitable programme, customised for each individual production line.
Pelleting was introduced into the European and U.S. feed industries in the 1920’s and late 1930’s, respectively. Since then, its popularity has grown steadily, to the extent that about 80% of all U.S feed is currently pelleted, with total global production of processed feed now exceeding one billion metric tons per year (Rojas and Stein, 2017). The process is widely used because of the physical and the nutritional benefits it provides. Observed improvements in animal performance, based on extensive feeding trials, have been attributed to pelleted feeds generating less wastage, lower selective feeding, less ingredient segregation, the need to devote less time and energy to prehension, destruction of pathogenic organisms, thermal modification of starch and protein and improved palatability. Research has concentrated primarily on the benefits of feeding pellets versus meal. This has highlighted the importance of pellet quality (Yasothai, 2018).
In the poultry industry, for example, pelleting has become the most extensively used thermal processing method in feed production, based on the use of pelleting to agglomerate ingredient particles by mechanical action, in combination with moisture, pressure and temperature. Pelleted diets, produced in this way, have been shown to increase feed intake, feed conversion ratio and weight gain, when fed to broilers. Further analysis indicates that the positive effect of pelleting on broiler performance is due, at least in part, to improved nutrient digestibility, increased feed consumption and increased resting time in the broilers being fed, resulting in lower energy expenditure by birds during their feeding activities(Kiarie and Mills, 2019).
However, this better performance can only be achieved if the pellets being fed to birds maintain their integrity until they’re eaten. In this context, pellet quality is defined according to the ability of the pellet to resist fragmentation and abrasion during handling without breaking up, enabling the pellet to reach feeders without generating a high proportion of fines or fragments (Keysuke Muramatsu et al., 2015).
Pellet durability index (PDI) is one of the key parameters used to determine pellet quality, indicating the percentage of pellets that remain intact after being exposed to mechanical forces. Pellets are subject to friction, impact and pressure during storage, transport and dispatch from the feed mill to farms. Poor-quality pellets disintegrate under such pressures, resulting in feed consisting of fewer complete pellets and an increased percentage of fines. If, in such circumstances, the geometric mean diameter (GMD) of fine particles is equal or lower than that of mash diets, then these particles may cause a nutritional imbalance in feed chemical composition, potentially having a negative impact on animal performance. The evaluation of diets with different combinations of pellets and fines, showing that birds fed a 100% pellet diet achieved the highest weight gain and feed conversion figures while the worst results were seen in birds which were fed 100% fines (Keysuke Muramatsu et al., 2015).
Analysis of the range of factors influencing pelleting quality, indicate that heat processing and feed formulation, especially fat inclusion levels, are the biggest end product influencers. That was the conclusion reached by researchers at Brazil’s Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, and Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. They also suggested that alternative procedures, such as the expansion process, increasing moisture level addition, fat inclusion restriction or post pellet liquid fat application, could be incorporated into feed milling to produce high physical quality pellets.
Meanwhile, analysis by R. Yasothai of India’s Tamilnadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, focusing on fat free and low-fat diets, found that using the highest possible conditioning temperature improved pellet durability and reduced pellet mill energy consumption. It also improved pellet durability in high fat diets (Yasothai, 2018). In addition, increased steam conditioning was found to have led to a decrease in mechanical friction during pelleting, decreased electrical energy consumption and improved pellet durability.
The primary objective of pelleting, of course, is to produce a palatable, high quality product with minimum production expense. Factors influencing pellet quality, such as grinding, mixing, conditioning, pelleting techniques and cooling are therefore important and potentially fertile areas for securing further pellet quality improvements (Figure 1). This includes pellet press settings, which have been shown to impact on the technical quality of pellets and therefore the profitability of the pelleting process.
Temperature and time are also key end product factors, with research showing that different conditioning temperatures (70, 80, and 90°C) and time (50 s and 75 s) affects nutrient profiles and protein fractions of co-products from bio-oil processing in dairy cows (Huang et al., 2015).
There is also limits to the fineness of the particle size which should be used in diets from a health perspective. Very fine particles, for example, have been found to negatively affect gut health due to being linked with higher incidences of stomach ulceration in pigs and gizzard dysfunction in poultry.
The need to achieve pellets with high physical quality and to reduce potential levels of feed-borne pathogens, such as Salmonella, has therefore led to the application of relatively high conditioning temperatures during conventional hydrothermal processes, a practice that doesn’t favour high nutrient utilisation or the stability of heat sensitive feed additives, such as feed enzymes. As such, within evolving pig and poultry production practices, feed processing systems will no longer be evaluated only in terms of optimising nutrient utilisation, but also in terms of impact on feed hygiene, the efficacy of feed additives, animal health and food safety (Kiarie and Mills, 2019).
While the benefitsts of feed processing in terms of animal performance and economics are proven, therefore, the need for every-improving pellet quality, nutrient digestibility, protein denaturation and milling effciency will continue to stimulate innovations in feed manufacturing.
References
Huang, X., Christensen, C., Yu, P., 2015. Effects of conditioning temperature and time during the pelleting process on feed molecular structure, pellet durability index, and metabolic features of co-products from bio-oil processing in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 98, 4869–4881. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-9290
Keysuke Muramatsu, Andréia Massuquetto, Fabiano Dahlke, Alex Maiorka, 2015. Factors that Affect Pellet Quality: A Review. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. A 5. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6256/2015.09.002
Kiarie, E.G., Mills, A., 2019. Role of feed processing on gut health and function in pigs and poultry: conundrum of optimal particle size and hydrothermal regimens. Front. Vet. Sci. 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00019
Rojas, O.J., Stein, H.-H., 2017. Processing of ingredients and diets and effects on nutritional value for pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 8, 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0177-1
Yasothai, R., 2018. Factors affecting pellet quality. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology.
Related topics
Authors:
Join to be able to comment.
Once you join Engormix, you will be able to participate in all content and forums.
* Required information
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Create a post
6 de septiembre de 2021
Another suggestion for PPLA is:
1) The DRUM COATER of the feed zone packaging system should be installed directly above the SURGE HOPPER of the packaging machine.
2) The bulk loading area should be installed under the bulk bin.
The reason is to reduce the generation of pellet powder. And to get rid of pollution.
THANKS, CHOI
22 de junio de 2021
My suggestion is also highly recommended for post-pellet liquid application. However, when applying PPLA, DRUM COATER must be selected when selecting the coating machine. The reason is to reduce the generation of powder.
This is because other COATING MACHINE, PADDLE TYPE or RIBBON TYPE increases PELLET powder.
THANKS, CHOI.
30 de marzo de 2021
For me, the particle size of raw materials is very important when producing pellets. Also, the pellet size is very important.
So, I propose as follows.
1. The blending ratio must also be good.
2, the combination should also be good. (My suggestion is that the CV should be less than 4.)
3. The particle size should be less than 700 microns for all raw materials. For Grinding, a 2.4 mm screen for corn and a 2 mm screen for wheat. It is recommended to use a 3 mm screen for soy bean meal.)
4. The temperature at the conditioner or outlet must be above 85°C. (The filling rate is 50-70%. The retention time should be over 25 seconds for SINGLE CONDITIONER and over 35 seconds for DOUBLE CONDITIONER.)
5. Wouldn't the size of the pellet die be 4.8-5.0?
6. Wouldn't the dwell time for pellet die be 10-12 seconds?
7. Of course, the PDI must be 97 or higher.
8. RETURN FINE should be less than 2%.
9. When the bulk is shipped, PELLET FINE should be less than 1.5%.
10. When transferring from BULK CAR to BULK BIN on farm, PELLET FINE should be transferred below 0.5%.
THANKS, CHOI
DSP Consulting LLC
11 de enero de 2021
I struggle with the effect of particle size on pellet quality as shown in figure 1 showing only a 1% impact. I think it is much more dramatic that suggested for finishing pigs. Pre-grinding soybean meal has shown to improve pellet quality and digestibility. When comparing corn particle sizes from 300 to 1000 micron, pellet quality will be impaired with coarser particle sizes.
Adisseo
1 de mayo de 2021
Personally, I feel feed millers and formulators should consider maximising their use of different liquid additives into mixers as much as possible which is long known to contribute to positive effects on PDI and pellet mill energy consumption. At the same time, optimizing the use of PPLA for heat sensitive liquid additives, such as enzyme, as well as Fats, and other palatable liquid additives. Liquid addition technology in feed manufacturing are so advanced, accurate, reliable and environmental friendly. The other parameters that affect pellet quality, efficiency can then be easier being focus and fine-tune in the pelleting production parameters process.
5 de abril de 2021
a good comment, Mr. Choi.
Saha Farms
10 de noviembre de 2020
I think so if more fine particle, the broiler may eat imbalanced feed that risk for rickets at early age.