Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

Minor Salmonella: potential pathogens in eggs in Algeria

Published: March 9, 2021
By: Ammar Ayachi, Omar Bennoune, Nouzha Heleili, Nadir Alloui / Department of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Health, Animal Production and Environment (ESPA), University of Batna, Algeria.
Summary

Introduction: Salmonellosis is one of the major foodborne diseases known to be closely related to the consumption of contaminated eggs, infected poultry, and poultry products. Control and survey of the poultry chain are the key elements and the most critical steps in the prevention of human transmission of Salmonella.

Methodology: This study was carried out in East Algeria on 150 eggs meant for consumption collected from mini-markets and immediately tested for Salmonella using standard methods (ISO AFNOR 6579 modified in 2002). Briefly, the shell surfaces were carefully wiped using sterile appropriated tissues while the white and yellow yolks were separated. All 10 samples were pooled together and a total of 45 samples were carefully analyzed.

Results: A contamination rate of 4.4% was found, and two strains of Salmonella bradford were isolated from white and yellow yolks. The results showed that XLT4 was the best medium for Salmonella isolation from yolks. Screening for other Salmonella in parental chickens using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test revealed seropositive cases of Salmonella enteritidis at the top of the poultry production pyramid.

Conclusions: Occurrence of Salmonella in yolks and seropositive results for S. in parental chickens is a serious and potential danger to public health. Radical and preventive measures must be taken at the critical points to control and to avoid human transmission. These measures must be installed at all levels of egg production through the application of appropriate and strict regulations, and use of good hygienic practices in transport, storage, and food preparation.

Key words: Salmonella; eggs; albumin; yolk; media.

Introduction
Salmonellosis is one of the major foodborne diseases in developed countries [1]. It is known to be closely related to the consumption of contaminated food of animal origin, including eggs and poultry meat [2,3]. Salmonella enteritidis phage type 6 (PT6) is suspected to be the cause of epidemics of foodborne diseases in many countries [4]. Other severe outbreaks of S. enteritidis PT1 infection have been observed [5]. Salmonella typhimurium, a redoubtable pathogen, was found and isolated from table eggs [6]. In the poultry industry, our government enforces regulations to control contamination by Salmonella pathogens that are considered to be zoonoses (S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium). If both serotypes are detected in any product in the poultry chain, the veterinary authority will stop the product from being sold for consumption.
Among all food products, eggs have physical and chemical properties that give them the best weapons against antimicrobial defense. Yet, within the chain of egg consumption, egg contamination can occur by vertical transmission of S. enteritidis that has an invader character, which leads to ovarian follicle infection without apparent symptoms.
In our study, the eggs were from laying hens, which were distributed by the main supplier of eggs for hatching to pullet breeders in the Batna district. Salmonella detection in eggs is done consistently. When Salmonella serotypes considered to be minor Salmonella (i.e., those that are not subject to the survey of the veterinary authority) are found, we are prompted to seek zoonotic serotypes such as S. enteritidis in a more appropriate manner using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. The discovery of this kind of Salmonella led us to think that the main source of reproductive hatching eggs in the region is contaminated.
The aim of this study was to control the quality of eggs from Salmonella contamination and to seek S. enteritidis in parental layer breeders from which these eggs originated.
Methodology
There are 10 supermarkets in Batna. Eggs, carefully selected based on size and quality, are presented in plates covered with cellophane in markets, but they are expensive for the average consumer. Small markets characterized by a lack of air-conditioning facilities usually sell eggs in small retail markets in the summer and warm weather. The sample plates of eggs examined in this study were selected based on the quality of eggs; dirty, cracked, and deformed eggs were purchased.
Five egg-tray packs (30 eggs each) were obtained from five retail sellers arbitrarily, which were chosen from a group of 50 small markets. These downgraded eggs are exposed in market stalls but are generally not sold to consumers. The present study focused the effect of these downgraded eggs and their consequences on the proliferation of Salmonella on the shelf life of eggs. These eggs were transported as soon as possible to the laboratory and quickly analyzed to search for Salmonella according to ISO AFNOR 6579 method modified in 2002 [7]. Briefly, shell surfaces of 10 eggs were cleaned with sterile wet tissues (10 eggs constituted one sample). Yellow yolks were aseptically sampled, pooled together, and mixed using a stomacher to get best homogenization; the same was done for the albumin. Each sample (sterile tissue, pooled yellow yolk, and albumin) was inoculated on 225 mL of buffered peptone water (BPW). After 16 hours of incubation at 35°C, 0.1 mL and 10 mL of BPW were transferred into 10 mL of tetrathionate broth and 100 mL of selenite broth, respectively. Then, subcultures were done on XLD agar, XLT4 agar, and Hektoen agar, and were then incubated at 37°C for 24 hours.
The suspected colonies were inoculated on triple sugar iron (TSI) agar, and those showing results indicative of Salmonella (Gaz [+], H2S [+], glucose [+], lactose [-], sucrose [-], and urea indole [-]) were confirmed on API-10S strips. Serotyping was done by polyclonal Salmonella antisera O and H as well as phase inversion [8]. An antibiogram for the 14 most commonly used antimicrobials in human and veterinary medicine (ampicillin, ticarcillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, imipenem, cefalotin, cefoxitin, cefotaxim, amikacin, isepamycin, chloramphenocol, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and colistin) was obtained using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)’s Kirby-Bauer method [9].
This study was extended to detect S. enteritidis in parental chickens 22 months of age. The eggs used in the study originated from parental layer hen breeders belonging to the public holding of poultry, which dispatches eggs for laying pullets to all the regions of Banta governorate (42 units in total). These birds produced eggs distributed by supermarkets (10) and many minimarkets (150). The screening of S. enteritidis antibodies in the 360 sera belonging to parental chickens of layer breeders was undertaken using an ELISA kit (IDEXX Laboratories, Westbrook, Maine, United States). Blood collections were made carefully from the wing vein; 5 mL of blood was obtained in sterile tubes, and serum was collected after centrifugation at 1,500 × g.
S. enteritidis in the oviducts of laying hens was not investigated because there was no suspicion of S. enteritidis in this herd. If Salmonella is detected in the oviducts of breeder pullets, these pullets must be slaughtered, which is not permitted before salmonellosis was declared in the herd.
Results
Enterobacteria in egg components is generally more important than those recovered on the loaded shell with or without feces, blood, or cracks, but the differences are not significant [10]. The microbial load of egg components is generally significant when related to the cage type of laying hens [11] as well as the source of food, the use of drugs, and exposure to high temperatures.
Two isolates of S. bradford were detected from tray pack five and on the third pool of samples (Table 1). Only XLT4 permitted isolation of Salmonella strains from the white and yellow yolks, but not from shell (Table 2). Few serovars have been isolated; one isolate was found in France, and another from a turkey in Lower Normandy [12]. Resistance of S. bradford to ampicillin, ticarcillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cloramphenicol, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole is similar to serotypes tested by Maripandi and AlSalamah [13] and isolated from human and poultry samples (Table 3).
Minor Salmonella: potential pathogens in eggs in Algeria - Image 1
 
Minor Salmonella: potential pathogens in eggs in Algeria - Image 2
The prevalence of Salmonella in the commercial eggs samples used in this study was 4.44% (two samples positive from 45 samples). This rate is higher than that reported by Radkowski in 2001 and Poppe et al. in 1998 (0.4%). Cracked and dirty eggs have higher rates of Salmonella contamination [14,15]. Suresh et al. found that contamination of trade eggs by Salmonella was about 7.7% and egg surface shell contamination was 5.9%, while contamination of the eggs’ contents was around 1.8% [16]. The most serotype most commonly found has been S. typhimurium [17].
Detection of Salmonella needs special and careful attention. S. enteritidis has the ability to colonize the ovaries and the oviducts of laying hens for long periods of time and persists in the parental breeder flock population [12]. This bacterium has emerged as potential foodborne disease in humans [17,18]. Strains of S.enteritidis were found in chicken meats from retail outlets, with a prevalence of 15.91%, and exhibited resistance to more than one antibiotic [13]. An organic acid mixture has been evaluated and used to reduce S. enteritidis horizontal transmission in broilers [19]. Other S. enteritidis-specific antibodies (IgY) derived from egg yolks and combined with probiotics have a protective effect and prevent Salmonella infection in poultry [20].
It is important to consider the protective effects of the albumin of eggs, which inhibits S. enteritidis growth in a dependent mode of time and temperature; however, when the egg white and yellow are mixed together, the protective effects of lysozymes contained in the white are inhibited. Bacteria contained in eggs, especially S. enteritidis, can proliferate with more vivacity when iron sulphate is added to the preenrichment broth [21].
During the period 2000–2012, more than 780 avian Salmonella outbreaks were recorded at the national level with a prevalence of 42.08% and were identified as belonging to S. entertidis. Over 33% of Salmonella outbreaks have been declared in laying hens [22].
Screening for S. enteritidis using an ELISA kit showed eight positive cases from 360 parental chickens (2.22%).
Discussion
The existence of Salmonella on the shell surfaces and insides of eggs represent a potential threat to public health. Surfaces can be contaminated either in the distal part of the oviduct or by fecal matter [19]. S. enteritidis appears to play a key role in egg contamination and appears to be found mostly on eggshells [12]. Sun exposure, ionizing radiations, and insufficient storage of commercial eggs for consumption have direct consequences on the quality of eggs, but have direct effects on the microbial charge of the shell surface [20]. This may explain the lack of Salmonella serotypes on shell surfaces in this study.
Eggs are not sanitized after they are posed in pack trays in all floors of laying hens producing table eggs. Germs located on egg shells are certainly excessive, in addition to exposure of egg trays to heat under poor storage conditions. This fact makes consumption of eggs from small markets a source of contamination for humans. Even if the rate of contamination is not very high (4.4%) and Salmonella responsible for zoonosis in these eggs is not isolated, the risk still exists. Freshly laid eggs contain small numbers of Salmonella cells [24]. Prompt refrigeration is crucial to restrict the development of these bacteria [22]. Prevention of foodborne disease requires radical improvement of catering practices and kitchen hygiene [25].
Conclusions
The rates of Salmonella seropositive cases in parental chickens is alarming. Parental chickens are located at the top of the poultry production pyramid and play a key role in the vertical and rapid transmission of the infections to their offspring with amplified antibiotic resistance. Preventive and drastic measures must be adopted at all levels of the table-egg production system through application of appropriate regulations and use of good practices.
This article was originally published in The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries 2015; 9(10):1156-1160. doi:10.3855/jidc.6526. This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.

1. Fluit AC, Widjojoatmodjo MN, Box AT, Torensma R, Verhoef J (1993) Rapid detection of salmonellae in poultry with the magnetic immuno-polymerase chain reaction assay. Appl Environ Microbiol 59: 1342-1346.

2. Foley SL, Lynne AM, Nayak R (2008) Salmonella challenges: Prevalence in swine and poultry and potential pathogenicity of such isolates. J Anim Sci 86 Suppl 14: E149- E162.

3. Luber P (2009) Cross-contamination versus undercooking of poultry meat or eggs - which risks need to be managed first? Int J Food Microbiol 134: 21-28.

4. Evans MR, Will L, Ribeiro CD (1998) Salmonella Enteritidis PT6: Another Egg-Associated Salmonellosis? Emerg Infect Diseases 4: 667-669.

5. Giraudon I, Cathcart S, Blomqvist S, Littleton A, Surman-Lee S, Mifsud A, Anaraki S, Fraser G (2009) Large outbreak of salmonella phage type 1 infection with high infection rate and severe illness associated with fast food premises. Public Health 123: 444-447.

6. Nagappa K, Tamuly S, Saxena BMK, Singh SP (2007) Isolation of Salmonella Typhimurium from poultry eggs and meat of Tarai region of Uttaranchal. Indian J Biotechnol 6: 407-409.

7. Association Française de Normalisation NF EN ISO 6579 (2002) Microbiologie des aliments, Méthode pour la recherche des Salmonella spp.St Denis. 27 p.

8. World Health Organization (2007) Antigenic formulae of the Salmonella serovars, 9th edition. Paris: WHO. Collaborating centre for reference and research on Salmonella. Available: http://nih.dmsc.moph.go.th/aboutus/media/antigenic%20form ula%20of%20Salmonella.pdf..Accessed January 2014

9. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (2001) Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 11th informational supplement. Approved Standard M2-A5. Wayne: CLSI.

10. AdesiyunA, Offiah N, Seepersadsingh N, Rodrigo S, Lashley V, Musai L(2006) Frequency and antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria with spoilage potential isolated from table eggs. Food Res Int 39: 212-219.

11. Mallet S, Guesdon V, Ahmed A, Nys Y (2005): Hygiene of eggs laid out in two models cages. Sixth days of the Poultry Research, St Malo, France, 30-31 March 2005. 487-491): Hygiene of eggs laid out in two models cage . Sixth days of the Poultry Research, St Malo, France, 30-31 March 2005. 487-491.

12. Martelli F, Davies RH (2012) Salmonella serovars isolated from table eggs: An overview. Food Res Int 45: 745-754.

13. Maripandi A, Al-Salamah A (2010) Multiple-antibiotic resistance and plasmid profiles of Salmonella enteritidis isolated from retail chicken meats. Am J Food Technol 5: 260-268.

14. Radkowski M (2001) Occurence of Salmonella spp. in consumption eggs in Poland International. Int J Food Microbiol64: 189-191.

15. Poppe C, Duncan CL, Mazzocco A (1998) Salmonella Contamination of hatching and table eggs a comparison. Can J Vet Res 62: 191-198.

16. Suresh T, Hathab AAM, Sreenivasanc D, Sangeethac N, Lashmanaperumalsamya, P (2006) Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enteritidis and other salmonellas in the eggs and egg-storing trays from retails markets of Coimbatore, South India. Food Microbiol 23: 294- 299.

17. Mirmomeni MH, Sisakhtnezhad S, Sharifi A (2008) Rapid detection of Salmonella enteritidis by PCR amplification of the SefA gene and its cloning. Pakistan J Biol Sci 11: 428- 432.

18. Rahimi S, Shiraz ZM, Salehi TZ, Torshizi MAK, Grimes JL (2007) Prevention of Salmonella infection in poultry by specific egg-derived antibody. Int J Poultry Sci 6: 230-235.

19. Van Immerseel F, De Buck J, Boyen F, Pasmans F, Bertrand S, Collard JM, Saegerman C, Hooyberghs J, Haesbrouck F, Ducatelle R (2005) Salmonella in poultry and eggs: a danger for the consumer who requests the establishment of an effective control program. Ann Méd Vét 149: 34-48.

20. Pinto P, Ribeiro R, Verde SC, Lima MG, Dinis M, Szantana M, Botello ML (2004) Sanitation of chicken eggs by ionizing radiation: functional and nutritional assessment. Radiat Phys Chem 71: 35-38.

21. Yoshimasu AM, Zawistowski J (2001) Application of rapid dot blot immunoassay for detection of Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis in eggs, poultry, and other foods. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 459-461.

22. Gast RK, Guraya R, Guard J, Holt PS (2010) Multiplication of Salmonella enteritidis in egg yolks after inoculation outside, on and inside vitelline membranes and storage at different temperatures. J Food Protect 73: 1902-1906.

23. Gast RK, Beard CW (1992) Detection and enumeration of Salmonella enteritidis in fresh and stored eggs laid by experimentally infected hens. J Food Protect 55: 152-156.

24. Duguid JP, North RA (1991) Eggs and Salmonella foodpoisoning: an evaluation. J Med Microbiol 34: 65-72.

Related topics:
Authors:
Ayachi Ammar
Nadir Alloui
Recommend
Comment
Share
Ruth Tariebi Seimiekumo Ofongo
2 de mayo de 2021

Exposure to environmental factors and length of storage also play a role.

Recommend
Reply
ahmad
12 de marzo de 2021

which portion of eggs infected with salmonella?

Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Poultry Industry
Vivek Kuttappan
Vivek Kuttappan
Cargill
Research Scientist
United States
Kendra Waldbusser
Kendra Waldbusser
Pilgrim´s
United States
Phillip Smith
Phillip Smith
Tyson
Tyson
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.