Explore
Communities in English
Advertise on Engormix

Feeding a Synergistic Blend of Organic Acids and ß-1,4 Mannobiose Reduces Caecal Salmonella in Broiler Chickens

Published: September 11, 2023
By: S. VAN KUIJK 1, L. PINEDA 1 and Y. HAN 1 / 1 Trouw Nutrition R&D, P.O. Box 299, 3800 AG Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
Summary

The aim of this study was to investigate the overall effect of feeding a synergistic blend, that contains short chain fatty acids, medium chain fatty acids, hydrolyzed copra meal (containing ß-1,4 mannobiose) and microencapsulated sodium salts of butyric acid, on caecal Salmonella counts in Salmonella challenged broiler chickens, regardless of experimental conditions. To test this, data from 9 studies, performed around the globe (Brazil, Spain, Thailand), were combined into one meta-analysis. In all studies broiler chickens were fed either a control diet according to local standards or a diet containing the synergistic blend from day 1 onwards. Between day 1 and 8 of age the birds were challenged with one of the Salmonella spp. (Enteritidis, Typhimurium, or Heidelberg). The quantitative Salmonella count data were split between 0-14 days post inoculation (DPI) and 15-34 DPI. Data analysis was done in SAS taking within and between study variation into account using a random and repeated statement within the mixed model respectively.

The results show that in the period 0-14 DPI the synergistic blend resulted in significantly lower caecal Salmonella counts compared to the control diet. The natural course of Salmonella infection caused a decrease in the period 15-34 DPI, resulting in no significant differences between caecal Salmonella counts of both diets. Overall, it was concluded that feeding a synergistic blend is effective in reducing caecal Salmonella in broiler chickens within the first 14 days after the initiation of the challenge.

I. Introduction

Salmonella spp. in poultry pose a serious risk for food safety. The complex nature of Salmonella infections in poultry requires a multifactorial solution. It is key to preventing Salmonella colonization throughout the entire gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Short chain fatty acids (SCFA) have been described as having beneficial effects in the upper part of the gut, whereas medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) target the lower GIT (Van Immerseel et al., 2009). Coated butyrate is described as having an effect in the lower GIT (Van Immerseel et al., 2005). Combining these three ingredients into one feed additive blend results in a targeted response to Salmonella throughout the GIT. In addition, since a microbial imbalance, due to overgrowth by organisms such as Salmonella, may cause a less efficient gut immune response, a fourth ingredient was considered. Hydrolyzed copra meal with ß-1,4 mannobiose as main ingredient has proven beneficial effects against Salmonella in vitro and in vivo in broiler chickens, in addition to activating the innate immune response in macrophages, supporting the natural host defense mechanisms (Agunos et al., 2007; Ibuki et al., 2011). It is hypothesized that feeding a synergistic blend containing SCFA, MCFA, hydrolyzed copra meal (containing ß-1,4 mannobiose) and microencapsulated sodium salts of butyric acid will reduce Salmonella colonization in the GIT of broiler chickens. Several studies have been performed around the globe to show effects of this synergistic blend; however due to differences in study design and geographic differences the results were not always consistent. Therefore, all these studies were combined into one meta-analysis, aimed at investigating the overall effect of the synergistic blend on Salmonella colonization in Salmonella challenged broiler chickens, regardless of experimental conditions.

II. Materials and methods

Thirteen studies, conducted at various research institutes around the globe (Brazil, Spain, Thailand) were included in the meta-analysis. All included studies were performed at Trouw Nutrition research facilities or done at research institutes in collaboration with Trouw Nutrition. None of the studies were published, details on the study design per study are shown in Table 1. All studies were done in broiler chickens that were challenged with one of the Salmonella strains (Enteritidis, Typhimurium, or Heidelberg). In each study, from day 1 onwards, the birds received either a control diet, or the control diet with the synergistic blend (Fysal Fit-4, Trouw Nutrition, the Netherlands) added to it. The synergistic blend was a proprietary mixture of short chain fatty acids, medium chain fatty acids, hydrolyzed copra meal (containing 13% ß-1,4 mannobiose) and microencapsulated sodium salts of butyric acid. The blend was dosed at 3 kg/metric tonne in the first feeding phase, which varies in length up to maximum 23 days of the study, and 1 kg/metric tonne until the end of each study. In all 9 studies, quantitative Salmonella counts were enumerated in the caecum at one or more different days varying per study. Caecal Salmonella counts are expressed as log colony forming units (CFU) per gram caecal content.
The raw data containing caecal Salmonella counts of the studies were combined into one file. The data were analyzed in SAS using a mixed model including within and between study variation in the random and repeated statements. Data analysis was split into two statistical analyses. One contains the data between 0 and 14 days post inoculation (DPI), for which analysis 5 studies were included. The second contains data between 15 and 34 DPI, for which 8 studies were included.
Table 1 - Overview of studies included in the meta-analysis.
Table 1 - Overview of studies included in the meta-analysis.

III. Results

The results of the meta-analysis are shown in Table 2. In the analysis for 0-14 DPI including 5 studies, the caecal Salmonella counts were significantly lower in the birds fed the synergistic blend compared to the control group. In total a reduction of 0.429 log CFU/g (+/- 0.164) was observed (P = 0.011). There were no significant differences between the control and the synergistic blend in Salmonella counts between 15-34 DPI including 8 studies (P = 0.519).
Table 2 - Overview of the meta-analysis results for Salmonella counts. Results of 0-14 DPI were based on 5 studies, results of 15-34 DPI were based on 8 studies.
Table 2 - Overview of the meta-analysis results for Salmonella counts. Results of 0-14 DPI were based on 5 studies, results of 15-34 DPI were based on 8 studies.

IV. Discussion

The synergistic blend contains several ingredients and, based on the current data, it is not possible to link the results to any one of the ingredients. As described above, the main ingredients SCFA, MCFA, ß-1,4 mannobiose and the butyric acids are all individually described to have beneficial effects in Salmonella challenged chickens (Agunos et al., 2007; Ibuki et al., 2011; Van Immerseel et al., 2005; 2009). The combination of the different ingredients likely results in a functional feed additive that also supports the bird’s gut and supports the natural host defense mechanisms via the immune system. This is the first detailed study showing the effect of the synergistic blend on Salmonella control and growth performance, while combining different studies performed under various conditions. Future studies should be performed to look at other effects such as stimulation of the immune system or effect on gut health of the synergistic blend in addition to Salmonella reduction.
The inoculation of the birds included in the current study was done between day 3 and 8 of age, meaning young chicks were used for all studies. In young chicks, the gastrointestinal tract is not yet fully developed meaning that Salmonella can infect relatively easily. However, upon maturation of the gastrointestinal tract, Salmonella infections will be naturally reduced (Stern, 2008). This explains why there was no difference in Salmonella counts between 15-34 DPI.
From this study, it can be concluded that feeding a synergistic blend containing SCFA, MCFA, hydrolyzed copra meal (containing ß-1,4 mannobiose) and microencapsulated sodium salts of butyric acids may significantly reduce caecal Salmonella counts in young chicks within the first 14 DPI.
     
Presented at the 33th Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium 2022. For information on the next edition, click here.

Agunos A, Ibuki M & Yokomizo F (2007) British Poultry Science 48(3): 331-341.

Ibuki M, Kovacs-Nolan J, Fukui K, Kanatani H & Mine Y (2011) Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 139: 289-295.

Stern NJ (2008) Poultry Science 87: 2399-2403.

Van Immerseel F, Boyen F, Gantois I, Timbermont L, Bohez L, Pasmans F, Haesebrouck F & Ducatelle R (2005) Poultry Science 84: 1851-1856.

Van Immerseel F, De Zutter L, Houf K, Pasmans F, Haesebrouck F & Ducatelle R (2009) World’s Poultry Science Journal 65: 367-392.

Content from the event:
Related topics:
Authors:
Sandra van Kuijk
Trouw Nutrition
Yanming Han
Trouw Nutrition
Recommend
Comment
Share
Luc Goethals
Sanluc International nv
16 de octubre de 2023
Honestly, I also doubt if 0.4 log units really make a difference. On top this number is an average of 5 studies, which means that some study results might have been even lower or negative. From various scientific publications a drop of minimal 2-3 logs in the cecum are required in order to see really reduction in practise. Also, the "infection level" is too low to obtain representative results. Since the coated butyrate ingredient most probably is the only one reaching the cecum and potentially active there, one can question if it would not be more efficient and more economic to use that component solely at the correct dosage. The low or no effect (second phase) of the product surely does not reflect much synergism.
Recommend
Reply
Anna Catharina Berge
Berge Veterinary Consulting
13 de octubre de 2023
Is a 0.4 log reduction clinically relevant in the first 14 days, when there was no difference in the following up to 34 days? With 3 Kg/ton, this seems like a pretty expensive supplement that results in no reduction of Salmonella at the time close to slaughter.
Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.