Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

The Inverted-V Migration Fence...A First Look

Published: August 30, 2012
By: Dr. Mike Czarick and Dr. Brian D. Fairchild (University of Georgia)
Bird migration in a tunnel-ventilated house can cost producers in a variety of ways:
1) Significantly reduced bird weight gains due to insufficient feeder/water space for the number of birds present at the tunnel inlet end of the house. It is important to realize that it is not uncommon for 60% of the birds to end up at the tunnel inlet end of a house if migration barriers are not properly installed.
2) Reduced performance at the tunnel inlet end due to reduced bird cooling. It is very hard to cool birds with air movement during hot weather if there is little or no space between them. Furthermore, when birds are tightly packed together it is difficult if not impossible to remove the heat from between and under the birds.
3) Increased condemnations due to scratches. It is difficult to walk through birds at the tunnel inlet end of a house with a migration problem without birds jumping on one another.
4) Damp litter at the tunnel inlet end of the house. Yes, some damp litter on the tunnel inlet end is caused by very humid air entering through a house's evaporative cooling pads. But keep in mind if when there are 30% more birds in the tunnel inlet area of a house there is 30% more wet manure being deposited into the litter in the tunnel inlet area. If the birds are packed tightly together it is very difficult to get air movement over the damp litter to dry it out. Damp litter can lead to leg and condemnation problems due to both carcass and paw defects.
5) Bird crowding and damp litter at the tunnel inlet end of a house can lead to increased incidence of leg issues.

Figure 1. Inverted-V migration fence.
The Inverted-V Migration Fence...A First Look - Image 1
Over the years a variety of migration fences have been used by producers to help minimize bird migration over the course of a flock. For the most part producers have tended to settle on primarily two types of fences: the corrugated black plastic pipe (Figure 2) and the epoxy coated wire shelving (Figure 3). Each of these fences has advantages and disadvantages. The corrugated black pipe is easy to install, birds can easily jump over it in case of crowing when the producer is walking through the house, but can deflect the air movement off the floor when tunneling, and can be difficult to install around feeders and drinkers when the birds are small. The wire shelving material fence allows air to freely flow through it and virtually eliminates the movement of birds towards the tunnel inlet end of a house, but is not free-standing, requiring stakes or stands to be used, and the birds can pile against the fence if a producer is not extremely careful when walking their houses.
Figure 2. Corrugated black pipe fence.
The Inverted-V Migration Fence...A First Look - Image 2
Figure 3. Traditional shelving material fence.
The Inverted-V Migration Fence...A First Look - Image 3
Recently, a new migration fence has been developed that has basically combined the advantages of corrugated black pipe and wire shelving material fences while eliminating many of the disadvantages of each. The inverted-V migration fence is constructed by taking traditional wire shelving material and folding it into an approximately eleven inch tall V. The heavy gauge horizontal support wires have been positioned to both strengthen and improve the performance of the fence. The wire running along the top peak of the inverted-V provides strength as well as keeping birds from getting their legs caught in between the vertical wires if they happen to stumble while jumping over the fence. Two other horizontal wires, one on each side of the fence, provide rigidity when the top wire needs to be removed to facilitate the dropping of a water line into the fence. The wires are approximately four inches from base of the inverted-V which allows a water line to be dropped to a level where young chicks would be able to drink if the fences were to be installed prior to chick placement.
Figure 4. Inverted-V migration fence.
The Inverted-V Migration Fence...A First Look - Image 4
Figure 5. Top wire cut and three vertical wires removed to facilitate a lowered water line.
The Inverted-V Migration Fence...A First Look - Image 5
The inverted-V fence is self supporting and individual 10' sections (12' sections, Winter 2012) can be easily overlapped on top of one another a few inches providing a continuous fence from wall to wall (Figure 6). Depending on litter depth and feed pipe height the fence may not need to be cut to facilitate feed lines. Over the course of a flock the fences tend to work themselves into the litter about an inch making them extremely resistant to being knocked down by even the largest of birds (Figures 7 and 8). At the end of the flock the fences can be easily stacked and placed on a side wall for storage (Figure 9).
Figure 6. Two overlapped sections of fence.
The Inverted-V Migration Fence...A First Look - Image 6
Figure 7. Base of fence imbedded in litter.
The Inverted-V Migration Fence...A First Look - Image 7
Figure 8. Older birds with the inverted-V fence.
The Inverted-V Migration Fence...A First Look - Image 8
Figure 9. Four sections of stacked inverted-V fence.
The Inverted-V Migration Fence...A First Look - Image 9
One possible disadvantage of the inverted-V fence is that some producers who are presently using traditional shelving material may find the fence shorter than they would ideally like. Though the fence appears to perform as well as corrugated black plastic pipe in minimizing bird migration, birds can jump over it when crowded, unlike taller shelving material fences. The manufacturer is currently exploring the option of making a taller inverted-V fence, but as you might expect, this would increase the cost of the fence which is currently about the same as traditional shelving with stands or corrugated black plastic pipe.
The inverted-V fence has been under evaluation for approximately a year on a number of test farms. Feedback from the growers on these farms as well as others where the fences have more recently been installed has been very favorable. As with any new device, there could be unforeseen issues with the inverted-V migration fence but hopefully with its relatively simple design they should be minimal if any.
This article was originally published at UGA Cooperative Extension Poultry Housing Tips Vol. 24 no. 6, July, 2012. Engormix.com thanks the authors for this huge contribution. 
Related topics:
Authors:
Mike Czarick
University of Georgia
University of Georgia
Dr. Brian D. Fairchild
University of Georgia
University of Georgia
Recommend
Comment
Share
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Poultry Industry
Padma Pillai
Padma Pillai
Cargill
United States
Shivaram Rao
Shivaram Rao
Pilgrim´s
PhD Director Principal de Nutrición y Servicios Técnicos de Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation
United States
Karen Christensen
Karen Christensen
Tyson
Tyson
PhD, senior director of animal welfare at Tyson Foods
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.