Objective: This study evaluated the different traits from day-old to age at first eggs of Fayoumi and White leghorn (WLH) F1 chickens and their reciprocal crossbreeds.
Materials and Methods: In this study, 1,000 eggs were used to obtain experimental chicks. However, only 150 chicks were selected from each genotype for subsequent trial evaluation and reared on the same diet in a completely randomized design. The effects of genotype on each considered trait were analyzed by the statistical analysis system, and Duncan’s multiple range test made a significant difference.
Results: Comparative evaluations made on all parameters illustrated significant differences (p <0.05) throughout the study period. F1 acquired from WLH cocks and Fayoumi hens maximized weights almost at all ages during brooding, whereas pure line Fayoumi showed lower importance for the trait stages of growth. Offspring from the crossbreed of WLH cocks and Fayoumi hens had the highest weight gain than any other crossbreeds from 4 to 8 and 12 to 16 weeks of age. Pure line WLH and Fayoumi lay larger eggs and smaller eggs (41.67 and 34.00 g), respectively. The highest and smallest body weight at the age of first egg was 1,364.89 and 1,178.36 g in the main crossbreed and Fayoumi line. The main WLH cock and Fayoumi hens and reciprocal crossbreds advanced in age at first egg by 4 and 11 days, respectively.
Conclusion: The leghorn hen and Fayoumi cock crosses could be used to develop potential egg-laying lines than their reciprocal crossbreeds.
Keywords: Chicken; crosses; Fayoumi; performance; White Leghorn.
[1] Adebambo AO. Combining abilities among four breeds of chicken for feed efficiency variation: a preliminary assessment for chicken improvement in Nigeria. Trop Anim Health Prod 2011; 43:1465–6; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9844-y
[2] Khawaja T, Khan SH, Mukhtar N, Parveen A, Fareed G. Production performance, egg quality and biochemical parameters of threeway crossbred chickens with reciprocal F1 crossbred chickens in sub-tropical environment. Ital J Anim Sci 2013; 12:127–32; https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0921
[3] Nawar ME, Abdou FH. Analysis of heterosis gene action and maternal effects in crossbred fayoumichickens. Egypt Poult Sci 1999;
19:671–89.
[4] Khalil MH, Hermes IH, Al-Homidan AH. Estimation of heterotic components for growth and livability traits in a crossbreeding experiment of Saudi chickens with White Leghorn. Egyp J Poult Sci
1999; 19:491–507; https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2013.782
869
[5] Sabri HM, Khattab MS, Abdel-Ghany AM. Genetic analysis for body weight traits of a diallel crossing involving Rhode Island Red,
White Leghorn, Fayoumi and DandarawiChickens. Ann Agri Sci
2000; 38:1869–83; https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v45i2.10
[6] Khawaja T, Khan, SH, Mukhtar N, Parveen A. Comparative study of growth performance, meat quality and hematological parameters of Fayoumi, Rhode Island Red and their reciprocal crossbred chickens. Italian J Anim Sci 2012; 11:211–6; https://doi.org/10.4081/ ijas.2012.e39
[7] Rajput N, Rind ML, Rind R. Effect of flock size on Fayoumi layer production. J Anim Vet Adv 2005; 4:842–4; https://doi.org/10.10
80/09712119.2012.672310
[8] Ewonetu Kebede Senbeta. Growth performance and rearing costs of Fayoumi and White Leghorn chicken breeds. East Afr J Sci 2017;
17:16–22.
[9] Javed K, Farooq M, Mian MA, Durrani FR, Mussawar S. Flock size and egg production performance of backyard chickens reared by rural woman in pesha war. Livest Res Rural Dev 2003; 15 (11). https://www.lrrd.org/lrrd15/11/jave1511.htm (Accessed on
January 01, 2020)
[10] Devi KS, Reddy PM. Genetic studies on certain economic traits in
White Leghorn and crossbred dual-purpose crosses of two indigenous with two exotic chicken breeds in sub hampshire chicken breeds under long-term heat stress conditions. Eth J Animal Prod
2005; 5:91–106.
[11] Adedeji TA, Adebambo OA, Peters SO, Ojedapo LO, Ige AO. Growth performance of crossbred and purebred chickens resulting from different cocks strain in a humid tropical environment. J Anim Vet
Adv 2006; 5:674–8.
[12] Chatterjee RN, Ahlawat SP, Yadav SP, Senani S, Kundu A, Jeya
Kumar S, et al. Comparative growth performance of Nicobari fowl and their cost effectiveness under backyard and intensive system.
Indian J Poult Sci 2002; 37:63–6.
[13] Peters SO, Ilori MO, Ozoje CON, Ikeobi OA. Gene segregation effects on fertility and hatchability of pure and crossbred chicken genotypes in the humid trop. Int J Poult Sci 2008; 7:954–61; https:// doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.954.958
[14] Bekele F, Gjoen HM, Kathle J, Adnoy T, Abebe G. Genotype × environment interaction in two breeds of chickens kept under two management systems in southern Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod
2010; 41:1101–14; https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.702.710
[15] Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. Introduction to quantitative genetics.
4th edition, New York: Longman 1996.
[16] Fotsa JC, Mérat P, Bordas A. Effect of the slow (K) or rapid (k+) feathering 279 gene on body and feather growth and fatness according to ambient temperature in a Leghorn x brown egg type cross. Genet Select Evol 2001; 33:659–70; https://doi. org/10.1186/1297-9686-33-6-659
[17] Nwachukwu EN, Ibe, Ejekwu, K. Short term egg production and egg quality characteristic of main and reciprocal crossbred normal local, nacked neck and frizzle chicken x exotic broiler breeder stock in humid and tropical environment. J Anim Vet Adv 2006;
5:547–51.
[18] Tadele D, Million T, Alemu Y, Peters K. Village chicken production systems in Ethiopia: flock characteristics and performance.
Livest Res Rural Dev 2013; 15. Available via http://www.lrrd.org/ lrrd15/1/tadea151.htm
[19] Abiola SS, Meshioye OO, Oyerinde BO, Bamgbose MA. Effect of egg size on hatchability of broiler chicks. Zootechnical 2008; 57:83–6.
[20] Nwenya, JM, Nwakpu EP, Nwose NR, Ogbuagu PK. Performance and heterosis of indigenous chicken crossbreed (Naked Neck x Frizzled
Feather) in the humid tropics. J Poull Res 2017; 14:07–11.
[21] Adedeji TA. Effect of chicken genotype on growth performance of pure and crossbred progenies in the development of a broiler line.
Int J Agric Innov Res 2015; 4:134.
[22] Sowunmi IO, Ikeobi CON, Adebambo OA. Effect of body weight at caging on pre-peak production performance of white feather Yaafa layers: egg number and egg size. NSAP Silv Annivconf/WASAP
Inaugural Conference 1998, pp 21–6.
[23] Ahmed BH, Saleem F, Zahid S. Comparative evaluation of fertility and hatchability of different crosses of chicken with White Leghorn for backyard poultry. J Vet Anim Sci 2017; 2:107–12; https://doi. org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2016.111.116
[24] Yahaya HK, Oni OO, Akpa GN, Adeyinka IA. Evaluation of layer type chickens under reciprocal recurrent selection. Bayero J Pure Appl
Sci 2009; 2:177–82; https://doi.org/10.4314/bajopas.v2i1.58539
[25] Kebede E, Assefa K. Effect of egg weight on post-hatch performance of White Leghorn chicken breed from day-old to laying age. J Turk
Poult Sci 2018; 15:16–22.
[26] Waleed M, Razuki A, AL-Shaheen S. Use of full diallel cross to estimate crossbreeding effects in laying chickens, Iraq. Int J Poult Sci
2011; 10:197–204; https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0441043
[27] Shafik A, El-Bayomi KH, Sosa GAC, Osman AMR. Effect of crossing
Fayoumi and Rhode Island Red on growth performance, egg and reproductive traits under Egyptian conditions. Benha Vet Med J
2013; 24:11–8.
[28] Groen AF, Heelsum, AV, Kimani CW, Van Druncu CP. Heterosis and reciprocal effects for egg laying traits estimated from a full dialed cross with six commercial White Leghorn lines, using mixed model analy. Arch Geflugelk 1998; 62:115–20; https://doi.org/10.2298/
BAH1402303H
[29] Lemlem A, Tesfay Y. Performance of exotic and indigenous poultry breeds managed by smallholder farmers in northern Ethiopia.
Livest Res Rural Dev 2010; 26:24–36.
[30] Zaman MA, Ahmed S, Sutradhar BC. Study on the egg quality of a breed and three crossbreds at various ages under semi-scavenging system of management. Pak J Biol Sci 2004; 8:211–4; https://doi. org/10.3923/pjbs.2005.211.214
[31] Agaviezor BO, Ajayi FO, Adebambo BO, Gunn HH. Nigeria indigenous vs exotic hens: the correlation factor in body weight and laying performance. Afr Res Rev 2011: 5:405–13; https://doi. org/10.4314/afrrev.v5i1.64537
[32] Niknafs S, Nejati-Javaremi H, Mehrabani Y, Fatemi SA. Estimation of genetic parameters for body weight and egg production traits in Mazandaran native chicken. Trop Anim Health Prod 2012;
44:1437–43; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0084-6
[33] Mshelia JL, Abubakar BY, Dim NI, Oni OO, Adeyinka IA. Variance component analysis of reproductive and productive traits in Rhode
Island Red and White chikens. A paper presented at the 19th
Annual Conference of the Nigerian Society for Animal production.
Benin, 1994, p 12.
[34] Laly-John C, Jalaludeen A, Anitha P. Impact of selection for part period egg production in two strains of White Leghorn. Indian J
Poult Sci 2000; 35:156–60.