Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

Intestinal Integrity of Broiler Chickens is Negatively Affected only at the Lowest Level of Dietary Protein Fortified with Synthetic Amino Acids

Published: July 31, 2023
By: R. BAREKATAIN 1,2; P.V. CHRYSTAL 3; A. MOSS 4; G.S. HOWARTH 2; T.T.H. VAN 5 and R.J. MOORE 5 / 1 South Australian Research and Development Institute, Roseworthy, 5371, Australia; 2 School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, 5371, Australia; 3 Poultry Research Foundation, Camden, NSW, Australia; 4 School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia; 5 RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia.
Despite extensive research on reduced protein (RP) diets in broiler chickens, the consequences of such practices for gut health and barrier function are not well defined. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of reduced protein and the source of protein. The control normal protein level diets had either meat and bone meal (MBM) or an all-vegetable diet (VEG). Accordingly, four diets were formulated; 1) VEG standard protein, 2) standard protein containing MBM, 3) RP (17.5% in growers and 16.5% in finisher) and 4) RP diet (15.6% in grower and 14.6% in finisher). Off-sex Ross 308 birds were assigned to each of the four diets and performance measurements were taken from d 7 to 42 post-hatch. Each diet was in 8 replicates (10 birds per replicate). A challenge study was conducted on an additional 96 broilers (24 birds per diet) placed in individual cages from d 13 to 21. Half of the birds in each dietary treatment were given three repeated injections of dexamethasone (DEX) to induce a leaky gut (Barekatain et al, 2019). On d 21, intestinal permeability was measured using fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran (FITC-d, 4.16 mg/kg BW). Ileal tissues for gene expression assays and caecal content for microbiota analysis were then collected from all birds. Both RP diets decreased weight gain (P< 0001) and increased feed conversion ratio (P< 0001) from d 7 to 42 of age compared with control diets, but there was no difference between VEG and MBM control diets. As shown in Table 1, reducing protein to 15.6% increased (P< 0.05) intestinal permeability independent of the DEX challenge. Gene expression of ileal samples revealed independent downregulation of claudin-3, a barrier forming tight junction protein in birds fed the lowest level of dietary protein (P< 0.05). A significant interaction was observed between diet and DEX (P< 0.05) where reductions of protein in grower diets (17.5% and 15.6%) upregulated claudin-2 only in unchallenged birds. Sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons showed that the overall composition of the caecal microbiota was affected in birds fed 15.6% protein compared with other treatments; they had a significantly lower richness of microbiota in both sham and DEX injected birds. To conclude, reducing protein below 17% may significantly compromise intestinal integrity and richness of caecal microbiota in broiler chickens, evidenced by differential mRNA expression of selected tight junction proteins, higher permeability, and changes in the overall microbiota composition. Inclusion of MBM at 4.08% in the control diet had no effect on the studied parameters compared to the VEG diet.
Table 1- Concentration of FITC-d (µg/ml) in broilers at d 21 of age
Despite extensive research on reduced protein (RP) diets in broiler chickens, the consequences of such practices for gut health and barrier function are not well defined. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of reduced protein and the source of protein. The control normal protein level diets had either meat and bone meal (MBM) or an all-vegetable diet (VEG). Accordingly, four diets were formulated; 1) VEG standard protein, 2) standard protein containing MBM, 3) RP (17.5% in growers and 16.5% in finisher) and 4) RP diet (15.6% in grower and 14.6% in finisher). Off-sex Ross 308 birds were assigned to each of the four diets and performance measurements were taken from d 7 to 42 post-hatch. Each diet was in 8 replicates (10 birds per replicate). A challenge study was conducted on an additional 96 broilers (24 birds per diet) placed in individual cages from d 13 to 21. Half of the birds in each dietary treatment were given three repeated injections of dexamethasone (DEX) to induce a leaky gut (Barekatain et al, 2019). On d 21, intestinal permeability was measured using fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran (FITC-d, 4.16 mg/kg BW). Ileal tissues for gene expression assays and caecal content for microbiota analysis were then collected from all birds. Both RP diets decreased weight gain (P< 0001) and increased feed conversion ratio (P< 0001) from d 7 to 42 of age compared with control diets, but there was no difference between VEG and MBM control diets. As shown in Table 1, reducing protein to 15.6% increased (P< 0.05) intestinal permeability independent of the DEX challenge. Gene expression of ileal samples revealed independent downregulation of claudin-3, a barrier forming tight junction protein in birds fed the lowest level of dietary protein (P< 0.05). A significant interaction was observed between diet and DEX (P< 0.05) where reductions of protein in grower diets (17.5% and 15.6%) upregulated claudin-2 only in unchallenged birds. Sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons showed that the overall composition of the caecal microbiota was affected in birds fed 15.6% protein compared with other treatments; they had a significantly lower richness of microbiota in both sham and DEX injected birds. To conclude, reducing protein below 17% may significantly compromise intestinal integrity and richness of caecal microbiota in broiler chickens, evidenced by differential mRNA expression of selected tight junction proteins, higher permeability, and changes in the overall microbiota composition. Inclusion of MBM at 4.08% in the control diet had no effect on the studied parameters compared to the VEG diet. Table 1- Concentration of FITC-d (µg/ml) in broilers at d 21 of age
Acknowledgment: AgriFutures Australia provided financial support for this study (PRJ-012293)
    
Presented at the 33th Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium 2022. For information on the next edition, click here.

Barekatain R, Nattrass G, Tilbrook AJ, Chousalkar K & Gilani S (2019). Poult. Sci. 98:3662–3675 

Content from the event:
Related topics:
Authors:
Reza Barekatain
Peter Chrystal
Baiada Poultry
Baiada Poultry
Amy Moss
The University of Sydney
The University of Sydney
Professor Robert Moore
RMIT University
Show more
Recommend
Comment
Share
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Poultry Industry
Padma Pillai
Padma Pillai
Cargill
United States
Shivaram Rao
Shivaram Rao
Pilgrim´s
PhD Director Principal de Nutrición y Servicios Técnicos de Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation
United States
Karen Christensen
Karen Christensen
Tyson
Tyson
PhD, senior director of animal welfare at Tyson Foods
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.