Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

Mycotoxicosis in Broiler Breeders

Mycotoxicosis problems in Broiler Breeders

Published: October 15, 2012
By: Alberto Gimeno, Technical Consultant of SPECIAL NUTRIENTS, INC., 2766 Douglas Road, Miami. USA
Mycotoxins are toxic secondary metabolites produced by toxigenic strains of some genera of molds. In particular, mycotoxins are polyketones compounds resulting from condensation reactions produced under specific physical, chemical and biological conditions that occur when the reduction of the ketone groups in the biosynthesis of the fatty acids, carried out by the molds, is interrupted. These fatty acids are primary metabolites used by molds as an energy source. Mycotoxins are usually formed at the end of the exponential phase or at the beginning of the stationary phase of the mold´s growth. Mycotoxins can cause diseases and disorders in animals and humans, called mycotoxicosis.
The most important mycotoxins which can produce mycotoxicosis in broiler breeders are, aflatoxin B1, and ochratoxin A. Other mycotoxins belonging to the trichothecene group, such as: deoxynivalenol (DON) or vomitoxin, T-2 toxin and diacetoxyscirpenol are also important, mainly T-2 toxin and diacetoxyscirpenol. Broiler breeder are resistant to zearalenone and fumonisin B1, but DON can cause some deleterious effects. 
Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1)
The AFB1 is produced by toxigenic strains molds of the genus Aspergillus and can be found as natural contaminant in cereals (mainly in corn, wheat, sorghum and rice) and cereal by-products, oilseed meals, cassava and other animal feeds.
This mycotoxin has high carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic activity. The main toxic effect is the hepatotoxicosis, but also can produce kidney problems. The AFB1 is immunosuppressive, since aflatoxin inhibits phagocytosis and protein synthesis (antibodies production), interrupting DNA, RNA and ribosome protein synthesis, as well. Amino acid absorption is altered leading to the rise of amino acid hepatic retention.
According to scientific studies, mycotoxicosis problems can affect breeders as follows:
Broiler breeder hens were fed diets contaminated with 0, 200, 1000, 5000, or 10000 ppb (micrograms/kg) of AFB1. All concentrations resulted in embryonic mortality and reduction in hatchability compared to control. In progeny chicks the AFB1 exposure resulted in immune dysfunction. The suppression of humoral and cellular immunity, imply that progeny chicks from broiler breeders hens consuming diets contaminated with AFB1 may be increasingly susceptible to diseases. Mycotoxin residues were found in fertile eggs collected during 14 days, at levels between 0.05 and 0.60 ng/g (nanograms/g) of AFB1; and between 0.19 and 1.20 ng/g of aflatoxicol (Qureshi et al., 1998).
Diets contaminated with 0, 5000, or 10000 ppb of AFB1 were fed to mature broiler breeder hens for 4 weeks. There was no reduction in fertility. However, hatchability of fertile eggs collected during the first week of feeding the toxin declined significantly from 95% in the control to 68.9 and 48.5% in 5000 and 10000 ppb AFB1 fed groups, respectively. With 10000 and 5000 ppb AFB1, egg production decreased significantly during weeks three and four after initiation of feeding the toxin, respectively. Necropsies of breeder hens after four weeks of consuming the contaminated feed, exhibited typical symptoms of aflatoxicosis, such as, enlarged, fatty and friable livers, and enlarged spleens. Whereas no latent effects of AFB1 or its metabolites were observed on the performance of surviving chicks, with the mycotoxin concentrations previously mentioned (Howarth et al., 1976).
Levels of 250, 500, or 750 ppb of AFB1 in broiler breeder hens (49 to 53 weeks of age) diets had not significant effect (P>0.05) on egg production, specific gravity, percentage of shell and albumen of eggs and body weight gain. Reduced body weight and body weight gain were observed in the chicks (7 days of age) originated from broiler breeder hens fed with the mycotoxin concentrations previously mentioned, compared to the control group. The contamination with AFB1 in the broiler breeder diets affected significantly the broiler chicks mortality (P<0.05) and linear effect was observed at 7 and 21 days of age (Adriano, 2004). 
Ochratoxin A (OTA)
Ochratoxin A is produced by toxigenic strains molds of the genus Aspergillus and Penicillium. This mycotoxin can be found as a natural contaminant in cereals (mainly in barley and rice) and cereal by-products, flour and peanut meal and other animal feeds.
The major toxic effect produced by OTA is the nephrotoxicity, but also can produce a liver disorder which produces an accumulation of glycogen in hepatic and muscular tissue. OTA is also immunosuppressive.
According to scientific studies, significant undesirable effects can affect breeders, as follows: 
Breeder hens were fed diets contaminated with OTA at 100, 500, 1000, 3000, 5000, or 10000 ppb (micrograms/kg), for 3 weeks. All OTA concentrations resulted in a significant decrease in feed intake, body weight and egg mass production compared to control (P<0.05). Undesirable effects such as, diarrhea, unthriftiness, water intake and depression were increased with increasing levels of dietary OTA. The enlargement of liver and kidney, and the presence of hemorrhages were more severe in breeders fed the higher levels of OTA. With all OTA concentrations, the creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, urea, and total protein levels in serum were significantly higher compared to control. With increasing dietary levels of OTA, the pathological alterations, serum biochemical changes, and production performance were more severely affected. (Zahoor-UI-Hassan et al, 2010). The OTA concentrations were immunosuppressive in the progeny chicks obtained from breeder hens consuming diets contaminated with OTA (Zahoor-UI-Hassan et al., 2011). 
Aflatoxin B1 and Ochratoxin A residues in edible tissues
White Leghorn breeder hens were fed diets contaminated with 5000 ppb (micrograms/kg) of AFB1 and 5000 ppb of OTA, individually and combined. With the individual administration, the residues of AFB1 in liver, kidney and breast muscles were, 1.44 ± 0.21, 0.25 ± 0.01 and 0.03 ± 0.01 ng/g and the residues of OTA were, 22.54 ± 1.48, 4.22 ± 0.93 and 0.56 ± 0.06 ng/g, respectively. When the mycotoxins were fed in combination, the residues of AFB1 and OTA were significantly lower in the tissues of breeder hens compared with those from the individual administration. The combined administration of AFB1 and OTA decreased the residue concentrations of those mycotoxins in the tissues and eggs. Residues of AFB1 and OTA in eggs appeared between three and five days after feeding the contaminated diets; and they disappeared between five and six days after removing the toxins from the feed (Zahoor-UI-Hassan et al., 2012) 
Trichothecene mycotoxins
The trichothecene mycotoxins are produced by toxigenic strains of molds from the genus Fusarium. There are over 40 derivatives of trichothecenes, but the most important mycotoxins in broiler breeders are T-2 toxin (T-2), diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS) and DON due to its toxic effects. DON has few undesirable effects in breeders.
Trichothecene mycotoxins can be found as natural contaminants in cereals (corn, barley, sorghum, oats, wheat, rice, rye and millet), cereal by-products, hay and silage.
The trichothecene mycotoxins have potent immunosuppressive activity. Some of these described negative effects are found in broiler breeders. The main damage produced by trichothecenes is in the gastrointestinal tract; however, depending on the species, the following symptoms can be observed: 1. Vomiting, diarrhea, tachycardia. 2. Bleeding, edema, necrosis of skin tissues. 3. Hemorrhages of the epithelial mucosa of the stomach and intestine. 4. Hematopoietic tissue destruction. 5. Decrease in circulating white cells and platelets. 6. Hemorrhagic meninges (brain). 7. Nervous system disorder. 8. Rejection of the feed. 9. Necrotic lesions in different parts of the mouth. 10. Pathological degeneration of cells in the bone marrow, lymph nodes, and intestine.  
Deoxynivalenol (DON) or Vomitoxin
This mycotoxin usually is an indicator that T-2 toxin or other Fusarium mycotoxins may also be present. DON alone has few negative effects in poultry (Jones et al, 1994); however, in field conditions, high levels of DON are sometimes associated with reduced feed consumption in broiler breeders.  In addition, Yegani et al in 2006 showed that diets contaminated with a high concentration of DON (12600 ppb) can affect performance and specially the immune response of broiler breeders. Also, Awad et al in 2008 showed that DON has significant undesirable effects in chickens, especially as an immunotoxic substance,  affecting hematocrit values, total numbers of white blood cells, CD4+ and CD8 + cells, T-lymphocytes and B-lymphocytes, and biliary IgA concentration. Gut functions were also affected with a decrease in the glucose and amino acid absorption.
DON concentrations of 2500, 3100, or 4900 ppb (micrograms/kg) in breeder hens feed, provided for 10 weeks, did not produce any negative effects on egg production, feed intake, fertility, hatchability or embryonic mortality. However, there were significant development of abnormalities in progeny chicks, with unabsorbed yolk sac and delayed ossification. Low levels of zearalenone, ochratoxin A, 3-Acetyl-DON and nivalenol were found in the experimental diets; however the possible toxic contributions from these mycotoxins were considered negligible (Leeson et al., 1995). 
T-2 toxin (T-2)
Feeds containing 1000, 5000, or 10000 ppb (micrograms/kg) of T-2 toxin given to breeder hens for a period of 28 days resulted in a decrease in egg production  of 12.5, 68.0, and 78.9%, respectively, and a decrease in hatchability of these same eggs (Leeson et al., 1995).
With a concentration of 500 ppb of T-2 toxin in feed, breeder hens already developed oral lesions after consuming the feed for a period of 3 weeks. Contamination levels of 2000, 4000 and 8000 ppb, negatively affected hatchability of the fertile eggs which was significantly lower (P<0.05) compared to those from the breeder hens receiving the control diet. In addition, a decrease in feed intake, egg production, and egg-shell thickness was observed with the contaminated feeds. Fertility and the relative weights of liver, heart, gizzard and spleen were not influenced by T-2 toxin. Serum levels of alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase and uric acid of breeder hens fed 8000 ppb of T-2 toxin were higher than in breeders receiving the uncontaminated diet. Oral lesions were evident in the breeders after the second week of receiving 4000 and 8000 ppb T-2 toxin concentrations (Leeson et al., 1995). 
Diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS)
Caged broiler breeder hens were fed diets contaminated with 0, 5000, 10000, or 20000 ppb (micrograms/kg) of DAS from 24 to 25 weeks of age. The mycotoxin decreased body weight and feed consumption, indicating feed refusal. These mycotoxin concentrations resulted in oral lesions. The salivary glands and the tip of the tongue were the areas of the mouth most sensitive to DAS (Brake et al., 2000).
Individually caged male and female broiler breeders were fed diets containing 0, 5000, 10000, or 20000 ppb of DAS from 25 to 27 weeks of age. All levels of mycotoxin reduced body weight and feed consumption in hens; but the only effect in males was a reduction in feed intake at 10000 and 20000 ppb levels (Brake et al., 2000). 
Male broiler breeders on litter were fed diets contaminated with 0 and 10000 ppb of DAS from 23 to 25 weeks of age. Feed consumption was measured, even though they were on a restricted feed intake program. The high level of DAS increased the amount of unconsumed feed at 23 weeks of age.
In summary, the experiments provided evidence that DAS decreased body weight and feed consumption in broiler breeders with the presence of cytotoxic injuries, including oral lesions (Brake et al., 2000). 
Comments
It is clear that the most important mycotoxins producing significant undesirable effects in broiler breeders are AFB1, OTA, T-2 and DAS. DON, also can produce serious problems in the progeny. Some mycotoxin concentrations showed in this article can be found as natural contamination in feeds. In field conditions, T-2 and DAS can be found frequently in the litter material and because broiler breeders, especially males, always consume some litter due to the feed restriction program, the incidence of oral lesions in breeders is more common than in broilers. In addition, broiler breeders can be exposed to mycotoxins for a longer period of time. 
Bibliography
Adriano, J.F. (2004). Desempenho produtivo e reprodutivo de matrizes de corte alimentadas com dietas contendo doses crescentes de aflatoxinas. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. Santa Maria, RS-Brasil. pp. 1-65. Link na Internet: http://coralx.ufsm.br/tede/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=1238 (Consulted in: 12-03-2012)
Awad, W.A.; Ghareeb, K.; Böhm, J.; Razzazi1, E.; P. Hellweg, P.; Zentek, J. (2008). The Impact of the Fusarium Toxin Deoxynivalenol (DON) on Poultry. International Journal of Poultry Science. 7 (9): 827-842.
Brake, J.; Hamilton, P.B.; Kittrell, R.S. (2000). Effects of the trichothecene mycotoxin diacetoxyscirpenol on feed consumption, body weight, and oral lesions of broiler breeders. Poultry Science. Jun;79(6):856-63.
Howarth, B Jr.; Wyatt, R.D. (1976). Effect of dietary aflatoxin on fertility, hatchability, and progeny performance of broiler breeder hens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. May;31(5):680-684.
Jones, F.T.; Genter, M.B.; Hagler, W.M.;  Hansen, J.A.; Mowrey, B.A.; Poore, M.H.; Whitlow, L.W. (1994) (Reviewed September 2007). Understanding and Coping with Effects of Mycotoxins in Livestock Feed and Forage. Published 2 by North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service (North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina). Electronic Publication DRO-29, December, publication number AG-523, p. 1-31 in Internet:http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/disaster/drought/old/dro-29.html#poultry (Consulted in: 12-03-2012)
Leeson,S., Diaz,G.J and Summers, J.D. (1995). Poultry Metabolic Disorders and Mycotoxins. University Books (Ed.), P.O. Box 1326, Guelph, Ontario (Canada) N1H 6N8. pp.1-351. Chapter 12. Trichothecenes.
Qureshi, M.A.; Brake, J.; Hamilton, P.B.; Hagler, W.M Jr.; Nesheim, S. (1998). Dietary exposure of broiler breeders to aflatoxin results in immune dysfunction in progeny chicks. Poultry Science, Jun;77(6):812-819.
Yegani, M.; Smith, T.K.; Leeson, S.; Boermans, H.J. (2006). Effects of feeding grains naturally contaminated with Fusarium mycotoxins on performance and metabolism of broiler breeders. Poultry Science. Sep;85(9):1541-1549.
Zahoor-UI-Hassan.; Khan, M.Z.; Khan, A.; Javed, I. (2010). Pathological Responses of White Leghorn Breeder Hens Kept on Ochratoxin A Contaminated Feed. Pakistan Veterinary Journal. 30(2): 118-123.
Zahoor-UI-Hassan.; Khan, M.Z.; Khan, A.; Javed, I.; Saleemi, M.K. (2011). Immunological status of the progeny of breeder hens kept on ochratoxin A (OTA)-contaminated feed. Journal of Immunotoxicology. Jun;8(2):122-130.
Zahoor-UI-Hassan.; Khan, M.Z.; Khan, A.; Javed, I.: Hussain, Z. (2012). Effects of individual and combined administration of ochratoxin A and aflatoxin B1 in tissues and eggs of White Leghorn breeder hens. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. May;92(7):1540-1544. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4740. Epub 2011 Dec.16. 
The article was previously published (by the same author) in: Gimeno, A. (2012). Mycotoxicosis problems in broiler breeders. International Hatchery Practice. Vol. 26. No.8, pp 25-27.
The article was also published (by the same author) in: Gimeno, A. (2012). Micotoxicosis en gallinas reproductoras. Albéitar España. nº 156. pp. 28-30, and Gimeno, A. (2012). Micotoxicoses em galinhas reprodutoras. Albéitar Portugal, nº 4. pp. 38-41. 
Related topics:
Authors:
ALBERTO GIMENO
Alberto Gimeno
Recommend
Comment
Share
ALBERTO GIMENO
Alberto Gimeno
20 de octubre de 2012

Dear Mr. Abdulcader and Mr. Ekramut Huque

I would like to explain that it is very difficult to establish the maximum tolerable concentrations of mycotoxins. There are several factors that can influence (increase or decrease) the toxicity of mycotoxins in animals during the consumption of the contaminated feed. Some of these factors are: the animal species and breed; the duration of the contamination period (extend of time in which the animals are ingesting the contaminated feed); the animal´s age and sex; the animal´s nutrition and overall health; bacterial, viral, or parasitical infections; inadequate conditions of the animal´s habitat (temperature, moisture, ventilation, handling and others); medication administered; presence of other mycotoxins and synergism or association amongst them.
Therefore, it is a risk to say that there are levels of mycotoxin contaminations that will not cause problems. It is safe to say, however, that there are relatively “safer” levels of contamination.
It is very difficult to try to establish guidance values and/or recommendations, because there are certain factors besides the ones before mentioned, that need to be in place, such as: availability of toxicological data; availability of data concerning mycotoxins incidence in the different feeds; homogeneousness of mycotoxins in the feeds (hot spots); availability of analytical methods for control of minimum detectable mycotoxin levels.
Therefore, some of the maximum tolerable concentrations of mycotoxins published in different articles, even the EU Legislation and/or EU recommendations, are lower than those that do not produce problems in the experimental cases. These are security and prevention measures.

Regards.

Gimeno

Recommend
Reply
ALBERTO GIMENO
Alberto Gimeno
20 de octubre de 2012

Dear Mr. Ekramul Huque,

I already answered this question to Mr Abdulcader. I am going to send you (via your e-mail address) the pdf files with the information which was referred in my answer to Mr. Abdulcader.

In my article entitled “Maximum tolerable concentrations of some mycotoxins: a review” published in www.engormix.com (Mycotoxins. English section), you can see the maximum tolerable range of different type of mycotoxins in different poultry feed.

Regards.

Gimeno

Recommend
Reply
ALBERTO GIMENO
Alberto Gimeno
16 de octubre de 2012
Dear Abdulcader The European Union has Legislation for aflatoxin B1 in animal feed for poultry and other animals (1) and Guidance Levels for deoxinivalenol, zearalenone, ochratoxin A and fumonisins B1+B2 (2). In spite of being not Guidelines, you can consult my article entitled “Maximum tolerable concentrations of some mycotoxins: a review” published in www.engormix.com (English section) (1) Official Journal of the European Union. COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 2003/100/EC of 31 October 2003 amending Annex I to Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on undesirable substances in animal feed. p.36. (2) Official Journal of the European Union. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 17 August 2006, on the presence of deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, ochratoxin A, T-2 and HT-2 and fumonisins in products intended for animal feeding. (2006/576/EC). Tell me about your e-mail address and I send you the pdf files with the information. The best regards. Gimeno
Recommend
Reply
ALBERTO GIMENO
Alberto Gimeno
16 de octubre de 2012
Dear Dr. Stephen Adejoro, Thank you very much for your comment and information. Regards. Gimeno
Recommend
Reply
ALBERTO GIMENO
Alberto Gimeno
16 de octubre de 2012
Dear Dr. Fakhrul Islam, Thank you very much for your comments. The best regards. Gimeno
Recommend
Reply
ALBERTO GIMENO
Alberto Gimeno
16 de octubre de 2012

Dear Jeff Li

The most important hepatotoxic mycotoxin is the aflatoxin B1, which produce fatty, and friable liver, pale-yellowish in color, massive necrosis, jaundice, and cirrhosis. There are also atrophy of the bursa of Fabricius and of the thymus. The liver and some muscles had petechial hemorrhages and necrotic focus. There are a deterioration of the hepatic cells, as well as fibrosis and hyperplasia of the bile duct. The surface of some of the livers is granulated and there are scattered lymphatic nodules.

The best regards.

Gimeno

Recommend
Reply
Stephen Adejoro Dr
Soavet
16 de octubre de 2012

This is a very good article about Mycotoxicosis problems in Broiler Breeders and should provide solution, however ,from field experiences we have noted that mycotoxinn contamination on the field is a multiple contamination and not often single mycotoxin contamination 

Management approach should focus on a broad spectrum toxin binder that can bind both small molecule like Aflatoxin, and large molecule toxin like DON
Most conventional toxin binder have narrow inter-layer spaces of say about 2.5 micron that can not allow large molecule toxin to pass through and be banded eg DON
it is in view of this that new technology like Nanotechnology l have been developed to expand the inter layer space by about 10 times the size say to 2.5 micron to allow the fixing of large molecule toxin, which incidentally are the culprit responsible for resistance development and vaccination failures
My contribution therefore is for farmers and practitioners to embrace the use of Nanotechnology broad spectrum toxin binders or activated toxin binders
Such Toxin binders are now available in the market and interested readers should make contact with engormix
Thanks
Dr Stephen Adejoro
Dr Adejoro is an international and independent poultry consultant and current contract Head of Research of Zartech ltd

Recommend
Reply
ALBERTO GIMENO
Alberto Gimeno
15 de octubre de 2012
Dear Alkam Ahmad For professional-ethical reasons I can`t answer your question because I am Technical Consultant of SPECIAL NUTRIENTS, INC., 2766 Douglas Road, Miami, USA. SPECIAL NUTRIENTS is a very important and professional worldwide producer and marketer of several Feed Aditives, specially Anti-Mycotoxin Additives. You can consult and get information about the particular subject in www.specialnutrients.com or http://www.specialnutrients.com/company.html You can also get information of SPECIAL NUTRIENTS from the “search” of ENGORMIX. The best regards. Gimeno
Recommend
Reply
S.m. Ekramul Huque
20 de octubre de 2012

Dear Mr. Gimeno,
Thank u very much for your valuable informative article about Mycotoxicosis problems in Broiler Breeders. Like Mr Abdulcader I also want know the maximum tolerable range of different type of toxins in different poultry feed. I will be very pleased receiving that informations.

S.M. Ekramul Huque
From Bangladesh
Email: huquezisun@yahoo.com

Recommend
Reply
Abdulcader
16 de octubre de 2012
I am aware that there is no concrete global guidelines for the acceptable limits of different kinds of mycotoxins in commercial broiler and breeder diets as they are acting additively;If u share some information in this matter I would be much thankful
Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Poultry Industry
Padma Pillai
Padma Pillai
Cargill
United States
Shivaram Rao
Shivaram Rao
Pilgrim´s
PhD Director Principal de Nutrición y Servicios Técnicos de Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation
United States
Karen Christensen
Karen Christensen
Tyson
Tyson
PhD, senior director of animal welfare at Tyson Foods
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.