Campylobacter (Fig. 1) is the leading cause of foodborne illness in the US and in Europe. Epidemiological studies indicate that poultry and poultry products are significant sources of human infection. In this context, Campylobacter colonization in the intestinal tract of broilers is an important parameter to consider, as intestinal Campylobacter count is correlated with broiler carcass contamination.
Fig. 1: picture of Campylobacter jejuni. From De Wood & Pooley, ARS, USDA
Since it has been estimated that a reduction of intestinal Campylobacter counts of 2 Log10 would result in a 30-fold decrease of human campylobacteriosis cases, and given that certain butyrate-based feed additives have already been described to decrease colonization of certain zoonotic pathogens in broilers, we decided to explore the effect of a target release coated butyrate, able to deliver butyrate in the distal parts of the gastrointestinal tract (ADIMIX®Precision), on Campylobacter counts in broiler caeca. To this end, we set up two different experiments.
In a first study (see Fig. 2), natural Campylobacter infection was mimicked. Three broilers groups were raised in separate isolators; one group received 3 kg coated butyrate product per ton finished feed, a second group 5 kg per ton, while the third group served as a negative control. Microbiological analysis of cloacal swabs demonstrated that the birds of all 3 groups were Campylobacter-negative at day 10, while they were positive for Campylobacter jejuni at day 18 (between 5.12 and 5.77 Log10 CFU/g caecal content), without artificial infection. While caecal Campylobacter count remained high in the negative control group, counts for the groups receiving butyrate were found to be below the detection limit of 2 Log10 at day 29 (for the 5 kg/T group) and at day 39 (for both butyrate groups).
Fig. 2: mean Campylobacter counts in caeca (first trial)
In a second trial (Fig. 3), the effect of supplementing coated butyrate during different feeding phases (starter-grower-finisher) was evaluated after broilers were orally infected with a Campylobacter jejuni on day 18. From the results it can be concluded that in this experimental setup, 3 kg/T of butyrate product was able to reduce caecal Campylobacter by minimum 2 Log10 units by day 39, when included in the feed from the moment of infection onwards.
Fig. 3: mean Campylobacter counts in caeca at dat 39 (second trial) (different superscripts: p < 0.05)
Apart from its well-documented trial on zootechnical performance, the tested butyrate product can therefore prove to be a valuable approach to reduce the number of human campylobacteriosis cases, by significantly limiting Campylobacter colonization in broilers.
Far from me the idea to question a so brilliant test…
However, I have great difficulty understanding how you can perform a test in microbiology with a product that for a by-pass effect of the stomach is physically present in a waxy gangue of stearin.
For memory:
- Stearin to a melting point at +/- 70 ° C.
- Campylobacter is destroyed at +/- 63 ° C.
Something escapes my understanding …
Philippe Gossart ph.gossart33@orange.fr
Initiator & first industrial manufacturer of sodium butyrate in animal nutrition. 1993.
Creator of sodium butyrate "double buffer protection" 2005.
Recommend
Reply
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.