Explore
Communities in English
Advertise on Engormix

Full-Genome Sequence of Infectious Laryngotracheitis Virus (Gallid Alphaherpesvirus 1) Strain VFAR-043, Isolated in Peru

Published: January 13, 2022
By: Sandra Morales Ruiz 1, Jorge Bendezu Eguis 1, Ricardo Montesinos 1, Luis Tataje-Lavanda 2, Manolo Fernández-Díaz 1,2 / 1 Laboratorios de Investigación y Desarrollo, FARVET SAC, Chincha Alta, Ica, Peru; 2 FARVET SPF SAC, Chincha Alta, Ica, Peru.
Summary

We report here the first genome sequence of infectious laryngotracheitis virus isolated in Peru from tracheal tissues of layer chickens. The genome showed 99.98% identity to the J2 strain genome sequence. Single nucleotide polymorphisms were detected in five gene-coding sequences related to vaccine development, virus attachment, and viral immune evasion.

Infectious laryngotracheitis is an avian respiratory disease which is caused by infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV), and clinical signs vary from coughing, conjunctivitis, and gasping to expectoration of bloody mucus and death (1).
Whereas genomic database analysis allowed the identification of an ILTV field strain in Australia as a causative agent of outbreaks as a result of recombination between attenuated vaccine viruses (2), genomic sequence data from viral outbreaks in South America are still unavailable.
ILTV was reported for the first time in Peru by the Servicio Nacional de Sanidad Animal (SENASA) in 2008 (3). ILTV in Peruvian poultry has been associated with a 16% decrease in egg production, an 18% increase in layer chicken mortality (3), and a 27.3% decrease in productive efficiency in broilers (4).
In December 2014, an ILT outbreak occurred at a farm in Chincha Alta, Ica, Peru. An ILTV field strain named VFAR-043 was isolated from tracheal tissues and propagated onto the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of specific-pathogen-free eggs (5). This animal study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru (SIDISI 65330). Total genomic DNA was extracted from the suspension of the inoculated CAMs using a phenol-chloroform method (6).
Whole-genome sequencing was performed by Macrogen, Inc. (South Korea), using a HiSeq 2000 platform. The reads were assembled de novo using NextGene (7), with a coverage of 87X. The open reading frames (ORFs) were analyzed and annotated using SnapGene (GSL Biotech LLC) and Artemis (8). BLAST (9) was performed to determine gene identity. The genome of VFAR-043 was 152,701 bp long. The genome was composed of a unique long (UL) sequence and a unique short (US) sequence, which were 113,917 bp and 13,125 bp, respectively. The US sequence was flanked by inverted internal repeat (IR) and terminal repeat (TR) sequences of 12,829 bp and 12,830 bp, respectively. The G+C content was 48.06%, and the genome encodes 79 predicted ORFs.
VFAR-043 showed 99.98% identity to the J2 strain, which was reported as a possible parental virus of American strains (10). A 98.85% identity was obtained as a result of alignment against the genome sequence of strain 4787/80 isolated from Italy, which has been associated with an attenuated vaccine revertant introduced into Europe from America (11). Moreover, VFAR-043 shared 99.47% identity with the Australian reference vaccine SA2 strain.
We found nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) in 5 gene-coding sequences (CDS) of VFAR-043 in comparison to the SA2 strain. We detected 4 nsSNPs in glycoprotein B (gB) (UL27), a protein which is associated with viral attachment to cells (11); 2 nsSNPs for gE (US8), a protein which has a role in the cell-to-cell spread of ILTV (12); 6 nsSNPs for gD (US6), a protein which is a receptor for ILTV binding and entry to susceptible cells (11); 8 nsSNPs in gG (US4), which is a chemokine-binding protein (13); and 10 nsSNPs for gJ (US5), a protein which blocks the apoptotic cascade in host cells (11).
To our knowledge, this work presents the first ILTV genome sequence reported in South America; therefore, this study will allow us to clarify ILTV epidemiology in Peru and to contribute to the knowledge of this virus in this region.
Accession number(s). This full-genome sequence of the VFAR-043 strain has been deposited to GenBank under accession no. MG775218. The version described in this paper is the first version, MG775218.1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was financially supported by the Programa Nacional de Innovación para la Competitividad y Productividad (InnóvatePerú) under contract 007-FIDECOM-FINCyT-PIPEI-2014.
We thank Angela Montalvan and Edisson Huaccachi for their outstanding technical support.
We declare no competing interests.
   
This article was originally published in Genome Announcements 6:e00078-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00078-18. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  1. 1. Fuchs W, Veits J, Helferich D, Granzow H, Teifke JP, Mettenleiter TC. 2007. Molecular biology of avian infectious laryngotracheitis virus. Vet Res 38:261–279. https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:200657.
  2. 2. Lee SW, Markham PF, Coppo MJ, Legione AR, Markham JF, Noormoham-madi AH, Browning GF, Ficorilli N, Hartley CA, Devlin JM. 2012. Attenu-ated vaccines can recombine to form virulent field viruses. Science 337:188. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217134.
  3. 3. Alvarado J, Icochea E, Reyna P, Angulo C, Zegarra R. 2013. Impacto económico de laringotraqueitis infecciosa en una granja de ponedoras en Lima, Perú. Rev Investig Vet Perú 24. https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v24i1.1667.
  4. 4. López L, Icochea E, Reyna P, Angulo C, Zegarra R. 2015. Impacto económico de laringotraquítis infecciosa aviar en una granja de pollos de carne en Lima, Perú. Rev Investig Vet Perú 26:630. https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v26i4.11219.
  5. 5. Kong C, Zhao Y, Cui X, Zhang X, Cui H, Xue M, Wang Y. 2013. Complete genome sequence of the first Chinese virulent infectious laryngotracheitis virus. PLoS One 8:e70154. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070154.
  6. 6. Nagy E. 1992. Detection of infectious laryngotracheitis virus infected cells with cloned DNA probes. Can J Vet Res 56:34 – 40.
  7. 7. Coil D, Jospin G, Darling A. 2014. NextGene. https://sourceforge.net/ projects/ngopt/.
  8. 8. Carver T, Rutherford K, Berriman M, Rajandream M-A, Barrell B, Parkhill J. 2000. ACT: the Artemis comparison tool. http://www.sanger.ac.uk/science/ tools/artemis-comparison-tool-act.
  9. 9. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi.
  10. 10. Loncoman CA, Hartley CA, Coppo MJC, Vaz PK, Diaz-Mendez A, Brown-ing GF, Garcia M, Spatz S, Devlin JM. 2017. Genetic diversity of infectious laryngotracheitis virus during in vivo coinfection parallels viral replica-tion and arises from recombination hot spots within the genome. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e01532-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01532-17.
  11. 11. Piccirillo A, Lavezzo E, Niero G, Moreno A, Massi P, Franchin E, Toppo S, Salata C, Palù G. 2016. Full genome sequence-based comparative study of wild-type and vaccine strains of infectious laryngotracheitis virus from Italy. PLoS One 11:e0149529. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149529.
  12. 12. Devlin JM, Browning GF, Gilkerson JR. 2006. A glycoprotein I- and glycoprotein E-deficient mutant of infectious laryngotracheitis virus exhibits impaired cell-to-cell spread in cultured cells. Arch Virol 151: 1281–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-005-0721-8.
  13. 13. Coppo MJ, Hartley CA, Devlin JM. 2013. Immune responses to infectious laryngotracheitis virus. Dev Comp Immunol 41:454 – 462. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.dci.2013.03.022.
Related topics:
Authors:
Luis Tataje
Manolo Fernandez Diaz
Farvet
Ricardo Montesinos
Farvet
Recommend
Comment
Share
Dr Sunil Devidas Deshpande, Geneticist & Poultry consultant
2 de mayo de 2022
Absolutely correct. Sequencing/molecular genetics is definitely a very good technology in identification, isolation and eradication of any vector. But with many years of experience I will say this has certain limitations that this technology is not at all useful to improve production traits, particularly in livestocks.
Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.