Explore
Communities in English
Advertise on Engormix

Methionine in Poultry Nutrition: A Review

Published: August 24, 2023
By: Daryoush Babazadeh 1, and Pouria Ahmadi Simab 2 / 1 School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran; 2 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.
1. Introduction
The best strategy to optimize production and reproduction in poultry species while mitigating the harmful effects of environmental conditions is proper nutrition1,2,3. One of the pillars of nutrition is the use of amino acids in poultry diets, among which Methionine (Met) represents the first limiting amino acid in broilers. As Bunchasak4 reported, Met can act as an amino acid in the synthesis of protein and polyamine, a sulfur donor, a precursor of main intermediates in metabolic pathways (for instance, Carnitine or Cystine), and a methyl donor group for the normal formation of co-enzyme S-adenosyl Met in and normal cellular metabolism. According to Elnesr et al.5, Met mainly functions as an antioxidant and the improvement in the antioxidant system activity is one of the solutions available to increase productivity in the poultry industry. Synthetic sources of Met, such as DL-Methionine (DL-Met), are included in poultry feed to optimize the dietary level of Met in animal hosts. Methionine plays an essential role in energy production and boosts the livability, performance, and feed efficiency utilization in poultry2,6. As Kidd et al.7 asserted, healthy poultry respond positively to the inclusion of amino acids as feed additives leading to a positive impact on performance. The addition of Met improves the reproduction performance, egg quality, and egg production of broiler breeders8,9. Methionine supplementation can also alter the immune response and is beneficial in reducing immunologic stress10.
As a sulfur-containing amino acid, the availability of Met is crucial for several metabolic pathways, that is the synthesis of proteins, transsulfuration, and methylation of DNA4,11. Methionine has a positive effect on the expression of stress-related genes and thus helps to protect cells against oxidative stress12-15. Methionine is supplemented during the fattening of broiler chickens, resulting in better performance and increased growth of breast and leg muscles16-18. It is evidenced that feeding broiler chickens with an increase in the Met concentrations lead to a decrease in abdominal fat as well as an increase in growth rate, breast muscle yield, and leg muscle yield18-20. Although the nutritional values, such as the protein and fat content, may influence the growth rate21, these effects were not specifically related to the supplementation of Met22. As reported by Albrecht et al.23, supplementation of Met leads to heavier fillets, a higher pH value, and longer sensory shelf life. The addition of Met to the poultry diet is correlated with the tendency to have less total body fat to improve growth performance and reduce odor-related compounds in excreta24,25. Furthermore, feeding excess dietary Met has been reported to impair body weight(BW)gain26. Similarly, Han and Baker27 indicated that 0.5% excesses of Met are not harmful to young broiler chickens fed corn-soybean meal diets.
2. Molecular structure of Methionine
According to the specification, the product contains 98.5% L-Met, 0.5% water (loss on drying), and 0.1% ash. The analysis of five batches of the additive showed an average of 99.2% L- Met (range 98.5–99.9%) and of 0.41% (range 0.38–0.44%) for the sum of other amino acids (phenylalanine, leucine, tyrosine, isoleucine, and valine). Other constituents consisted of water (0.04–0.11%) and minerals (about 0.05%), including Ammonia which did not exceed 0.01%. The highest amount for unidentified impurities was calculated as 0.23% on a dry matter basis (Table 1).
3. Source of Methionine
Methionine sources are used in two forms (powder and liquid). Unlike many amino acids derived from fermentation processes, DL-Met (DLM) is produced from a complex chemical synthetic process, and the starting material for its production is acrolein (carbon aldehyde) derived from propylene (a petroleum derivative)28. There is no difference between L- Met, and DLM regarding the effectiveness29. Industrially, the powder and liquid forms of Met sources are mainly used, known as DL- Met (DLM: powder form) and DL-2, hydroxy-4-[methyl] butanoic acid (LMA: liquid form). Both powder and liquid forms consist of an L-isomer and a D-isomer at a ratio of 1:1. In the metabolic pathway of poultry, 70-100% of the D-isomer of DLM or LMA is converted to L-isomer30,31,32,33. Some research has indicated that meat chickens in the grower and finisher phases can obtain sufficient Met while foraging pastures34. Upadhyaya et al.35 introduced Big Head fish as a rich source of Met.
4. Absorption and transportation
Amino acids, including Met, are mainly absorbed through the small intestine. As Soriano-Garcia et al.36 indicated, the absorption of dipolar amino acids, such as L-Met by the small intestine (brush border membrane vesicles) in chicken, is mediated by multiple pathways. They reported that L-Met is transported by systems specific to neutral amino acids and systems that also transport cationic amino acids. Regarding age, Noy et al.37 reported an increase in Met uptake capacity in both the duodenum and jejunum between hatching and 7 days of age, and a steady amount between 7 and 14 days of age. Therefore, they postulated that from 7 days of age feed intake may be the major factor controlling nutrient uptake in chickens. Excess Met supplementation seems to reduce the potential of the uptake of Met itself and other nutrients. Soriano-Garcia et al.36 reported that excess Met supplementation down regulates specific transport mechanisms of the small intestine involved in the apical L-Met transport. By focusing on differences between Met sources, different multiple transport systems appear to be involved in transporting both DLM and LMA. Knight et al.38 reported that L-Met absorption may be accomplished by both concentration and energy-dependent processes, while the absorption of LMA is concentration-dependent. The mechanisms of Met absorption involve Na-dependent transport, Na-independent transport and/or diffusion, while the mechanisms suggested for LMA absorption include Na-independent but H-dependent transport and/or diffusion38-41. Methionine can increase the digestibility of other essential amino acids and also changes the dynamics of amino acid transporters to reflect their availability42. Therefore, differences in the mechanism of transportation between the two Met sources may lead to different amounts of their transportation. Thus, the absorption and transportation of Met are complicated processes.
Table 1. Molecular structure and characteristics of Methionine
Methionine in Poultry Nutrition: A Review - Image 1
5. Interrelationship between Methionine and other nutrients
Among essential amino acids, Met seems to have many interrelationships with other nutrients (Cystine, Choline, Betain, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B12, and Folate) due to many metabolic pathways involving Met4,32,43,44. Methionine synthase is a Vitamin B12-dependent enzyme. Vitamin B12 is essential for the synthesis of myelin in nerve tissue, a function probably related to Met production from the Met synthase reaction and the subsequent formation of S-adenosyl-methionine43,44. The molar efficacies of Met, 1/2 Cystine, and Cystine are the same43. Poultry requires both Met and Cystine for protein synthesis, so the total sulfur amino acids (TSAA) requirement should be taken into account. In avian species, it is generally accepted that around 45-50% of TSAA can be supplied by Cystine.
However, Cystine supplementation has a negative impact on voluntary feed intake when the diet is markedly deficient in TSAA (more than 50% of TSAA intake is provided by Cystine)29. Moreover, when the TSAA requirement is expressed as a percentage of the diet, the need for a Met plus Cystine combination is less than that for Met alone45.
Since TSAA act as a sulfur donor, sulfur supplementation influences the sparing effect between Met and Cystine. It seems that when sulfur sources are added to the diet, the sparing effect between Cystine and Met or the TSAA requirement is reduced. Sasse and Baker46 found that when TSAA was at or near adequacy, the optimal percentage from Cystine was 48.4% in the presence of dietary K2SO4 and 52.6% in its absence. However, optimal performance occurred when TSAA was set at a deficient level, Cystine furnished 41.3% and K2SO4 of the TSAA need, respectively, in the presence and absence of K2SO4, respectively. Using practical broiler finisher diets, three trials were carried out to determine the extent to which synthetic Met can be replaced by sodium sulphate. The results revealed that weight gain and the feed conversion ratio both increased with incremental increases in sodium sulphate in diets containing sub-optimal concentrations of TSAA47. Cystine can spare with Met in increasing the absorption of essential minerals, such as zinc48. Lysine and Met as two essential precursors of L-carnitine can play important roles in lipid and energy metabolism in poultry. L-carnitine is a natural, Vitamin-like substance that acts in the cells as a receptor molecule for activated fatty acid. Its major metabolic role appears to be the transport of long-chain fatty acids into the mitochondria for B-oxidation. A shortage of this substance results mainly in impaired energy metabolism and membrane function. In this regard, some studies have indicated that carnitine supplementation of diets can be used to augment carnitine supply for use in metabolism, thereby facilitating fatty acid oxidation and reducing the amount of long-chain fatty acids available for storage in adipose tissue.
6. Protein level in the diet
Addition of synthetic amino acids like lysine and Met at high levels to the poultry diet can stimulate insulin secretion from the pancreas by being aggregated in plasma which in turn releases amino acids and fatty acids from the bodily saved sources leading to protein synthesis. The optimal level of Met in the diet seems to depend on the protein concentration in the diet. Vieira et al.49 indicated that the optimum dietary TSAA level depends on the dietary protein level. The TSAA requirement does not change with age when it is expressed in terms of dietary protein50. In addition, a broiler chicken’s requirement for TSAA increases with increasing dietary protein concentrations ranging from 19.7 to 25.9%51,52. Therefore, several investigators have suggested that the Met concentration in chicken diets should be around 2.5 to 4% of the protein concentration51,53,54. Although an increase in the dietary Met requirement is often found with elevated protein concentrations, the capacity to use Met for protein gain is also reduced55. Sterling et al.56 intensively reviewed the ratio of protein, including amino acids, and found that the amino acid requirements expressed as a percentage of diet tended to decline as protein content increased. In laying hens, when the ratio of protein: Met was kept constant, Met supplementation to a high protein level (18% Crude Protein) decrease egg production, while supplementation to lower protein levels (14 and 16% Crude Protein ) improved the production performance57. Jankowsk et al.58 reported that higher dietary Met levels (45 vs. 30% of Lys content) increase the final BW of turkeys and cause a beneficial increase in plasma albumin concentration. In addition, Elsharkawy et al.59 reported that supplementation of 0.1% Met to rooster diets can improve carcass characteristics and meat quality of progeny. Similarly, Liu et al.60 indicated that supplementation of maternal diet with 0.1% coated Met had a positive effect on growth performance and carcass traits of offspring. According to Rehman et al.61, in case DL-Met and L-Met are included in feed at a standard level, they are equally effective as a source of Met for the broiler chickens. These results may suggest that increasing the Cystine content by increasing dietary protein concentration reduces the Met requirement.
7. Methionine and heat stress
High environmental temperature decreases the feed intake to maintain homeothermy62 and degrades subsequent live weight gain, digestibility, egg production, egg quality, and feed efficiency63,64. Diets with an amino acid imbalance or Met deficiency normally increase heat production65 and induce a more negative effect of heat stress when the environmental temperature is high64. As balancing the amino acid composition in the diet with Met supplementation improves production performance through pathways of polyamine metabolism62, glutathione (derived from Met ) may reduce damage from oxidative stress. So, the TSAA requirement would be higher under hyper-thermoneutral conditions, compared to thermoneutral conditions. As Silva et al.15 reported, raising broiler chickens at a high temperature requires higher TSAA consumption to achieve optimal growth performance. It is well established that dietary protein produces a high heat increment63,66,67. Therefore, a reduction in dietary protein content with suitable supplementation by essential amino acids alleviates the negative effects of heat stress. However, the reduction of limiting amino acid or protein content in the diet negatively affects production performance. On the other hand, Met supplementation in low-protein diets improves production performance68-72. Therefore, reducing the dietary protein concentration by Met supplementation diminishes the negative effects of heat stress. Gonzalez-Esquerra and Leeson62 reported that Arg: Lys, Met source and duration of exposure to heat stress affected protein utilization in hyperthermic birds. Bunchasak and Silapasorn64 found that Met intake of 439.93 mg/hen/day (14% CP, 0.44% Met ) improved hen-day egg production and egg weight to the level of a control group (16% CP, 0.38% Met) leading to a Met intake of 372.94 mg/hen/day. Moreover, adding Met to a low-protein diet reduced the mortality rate of hens under heat stress, compared to a positive control group (16%CP; .038% Met ) or negative control (14% CP; 0.26% Met). Mahmoodi et al.73 revealed that up to 20% of the dietary Met requirements of broiler chickens exposed to heat stress can be fulfilled by Cholin (280 Chol and 560 Chol) and Betaine (320 Bet and 140Chol + 160Bet), without adversely affecting production performance. However, Amaefule et al.74 used old Bovan Nera layers that had been in lay for 4 weeks to evaluate the effect of Met, lysine, and/or Vitamin C supplementation on egg production as well as external and internal egg quality characteristics of layers in a humid tropical zone. The findings indicated that none of these supplements had any benefit to the layer hens. Thus, age and production conditions may be factors to consider when adding Met in order to reduce the negative effect of heat stress.
8. Effect of Methionine on the immune system
Numerous human and animal model studies have indicated that Met is involved in the control of many functions in the body, including participation in protein synthesis in cells of the immune system12,75-77. Therefore, a similar effect of Met on the immune system of poultry could be expected.
There are some reports that high Met supplementation promotes good health for poultry. For example, the supplementation improved leukocyte migration inhibition, cellular immune response, and humoral immune response78,79. Moreover, it can increase blood serum total protein, albumin, globulin, and antibody response to Newcastle disease virus, and decrease serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase79. Furthermore, Met supplementation can lead to an increase in total antibody, IgG, and response to the mitogen phytohemagglutinin (PHA), which might be related to T-cell help80. According to Bunchasak4, an increased Met content, above the level required for optimal growth, improves the immune response through direct effects (protein synthesis and breakdown) and indirect effects involving Met derivatives. Since leukocytes are important targets for the action of amino acids, of particular interest is the response of the adaptive (acquired) immune system consisting of T cells, B cells, and humoral factors81.
Particular attention is paid to the thymus, which is the site of T cell differentiation and development. Wu et al.82 demonstrated that Met deficiency in the diet can impair cellular immune function in broiler chickens by ultrastructural pathological changes in the thymus, decreased T cell populations, reduction in the serum concentrations of interleukine-2, and T cell proliferation through an increase in the percentage of apoptotic cells. Wu et al.82 Indicated that dietary Met deficiency reduces the population of IgA+ B cells and the contents of sIgA, IgA, IgG, and IgM in the duodenum and jejunum, implying that the impairment of humoral immune function in the intestinal mucosal immunity in broiler chickens. Yaqoob et al.83 reported that Met supplementation and threonine could effectively enhance growth performance and the immune system in broiler chickens.
According to the classification in Table 2, the F-AA group includes dietary Met+ Cystine. Sufficient dietary intake of both sulfur-containing amino acids is important for protein synthesis in cells of the immune system75. Cystine, however, should not be included in the diet at very high concentrations13. Takahashi et al.84 demonstrated that both sulfur-containing amino acids (Met and Cystine) have a beneficial influence on immune and inflammatory responses.
Table 2. Classification of amino acids in poultry nutrition
Methionine in Poultry Nutrition: A Review - Image 2
According to Swain and Johri78, Met plays a vital role in the humoral and cellular immune responses of poultry. It is known that amino acids are needed for clonal proliferation of lymphocytes, the establishment of germinative centers in the bursa of Fabricius to refine immunoglobulin affinity, recruitment of new bone marrow monocytes and heterocysts, and synthesis of effector molecules (immunoglobulins, nitric oxide, lysozyme, complement), and communication molecules (such as cytokines and eicosanoids).
9. Methionine deficiency
Deficiency in Met consumption negatively affects animals by growth inhibition, the induction of metabolic disorder, and the reduction of disease defensive potential65. A Methionine deficiency typically leads to poor feed conversion, retarded growth in meat birds, and reduced egg production in layers and breeder85. Methionine is a major component of feathers. Methionine and Cystine (another sulfur-containing amino acid that is not essential for the diet) are critical to feather formation. A deficiency of Met results in poor feather growth and increased feather pecking. A Met-deficient bird tends to eat feathers in an attempt to obtain enough Met, which can quickly turn into cannibalistic behavior in a flock4.
Dietary deficiency in Met particularly affects arginine metabolism as evidenced by increased expression in the arginine transporter which putatively shifts arginine metabolism from nitric oxide to polyamine synthesis42. L-Arginine (L-Arg) supplementation in poultry diets improves egg production, egg weight, modulates lipid metabolism toward reducing total body fat accumulation to improve meat quality, and increases antioxidant defense under normal conditions. Methionine is necessary for the synthesis of choline as a factor forming lecithin and other phospholipids in poultry. Diets with low protein levels and insufficient choline may cause the accumulation of fat in the liver86.
10. Reducing poultry nitrogen emissions
One of the environmental challenges that the poultry industry has been faced with is manure utilization or disposal. Poultry manure and its nitrogenous compounds can be a potential pollutant causing eutrophication, nitrate or nitrite contamination of water, ammonia volatilization, and acid deposition in the air87. Therefore, reducing nitrogen excretion and emissions in poultry manure is important to maintain a clean environment. Proper nutrition is an important first step to optimizing performance and growth in animals as well as reducing the negative impacts of nitrogen on the environment76. Amino acids, including Met, are components of protein nutrition that greatly influence growth4. Excess Met supplementation into diets increases nitrogen excretion and emissions to the environment. One way to reduce nitrogen excretion and emissions is by reducing crude protein (CP) levels and supplementing analogues of amino acids to meet the amino acid requirements88. Several analogue forms of Met are commercially available as economic alternatives for the animals. Supplementation of hydroxy analogues into low protein diets can minimize excess amino nitrogen in the diets and reduce nitrogen excretion76. Therefore, the effective use of such dietary strategies, a well-balanced feed formulation, and a precise way of rapidly quantitating the bioavailable Sulphur amino acid in feeds are required to be developed.
11. Organic standards
The National Organic Program rules initially stated that synthetic Met was a prohibited material for animal diets. An exemption was given to allow the industry to find alternatives89. As research continued in this area, the National Organic Standards Board recommended that the use of synthetic Met should be restricted originally to 4 pounds per ton for laying hens, 5 pounds per ton for broiler chickens, and 6 pounds per ton for turkeys and all other poultry. After October 1, 2012, the allowed levels were decreased to 2 pounds per ton for laying and broiler chickens, and 3 pounds per ton for turkeys and other poultry species.
12. Safety for the target species
The FEEDAP Panel considers that safety concerns for target species are highly unlikely to arise from the L-Met under the application. The safety of L-Met for the target animals has been assessed by the FEEDAP Panel90. The Panel based its assessment on the previously established safety of D-L Met and the specific metabolism of L-Met and concluded that no safety concerns were expected. The absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of Met have been extensively described in a previous opinion of the FEEDAP Panel91. Therefore, the FEEDAP Panel concludes that L-Met produced by Corynebacterium glutamic KCCM 80184 and Escherichia coli KCCM 80096 is safe for the target species, consumers, and the environment.
13. Target species of poultry
13.1. Broiler chickens
Feed consumption is mainly controlled by dietary energy. Summers et al.69 reported that the level and balance of essential amino acids (EAA) significantly affected feed intake, and consequently weight gain and carcass composition. Broiler chickens appear to react to amino acid deficiencies within a short period (hours) by adjusting their feed intake and/or selection and these responses are influenced by age and prior experience. It is reported Met deficiencies decrease the feed intake of broiler chickens due to amino acid imbalances4,85,92. It can be assumed that, under amino acid imbalances, chickens lose the potential to adjust feed intake to satisfy their amino acid requirements; the main positive effect of Met supplementation may come from its improvement of feed intake via the amino acid balance. Genetic diversity also influences the Met utilization of chickens. Geraert et al.93 observed that the genetically fat-type chickens had lower plasma concentrations of most glucogenic amino acids and higher levels of branched-chain and sulfur-containing amino acids than lean-type chickens. Many factors, such as genetic diversity, environmental conditions, nutrients, and stress, involve body fat deposition. Summers et al.69 reported that the level and balance of EAA have a significant effect on feed intake, thereby influencing weight gain and carcass composition. Generally, larger chickens have more breast meat and a heavier abdominal fat pad. Increasing dietary Met increases the mass of breast meat but reduces the size of the abdominal fat pad due to a good balance of amino acids4,19. Additionally, Zhan et al.94 reported that Met supplementation significantly increased breast muscle yield and decreased abdominal fat content. They found that supplementation with Met significantly increased the contents of creatine and free carnitine in the liver, the activity of hormone-sensitive lipase in abdominal fat, and the concentration of free fatty acid in serum, whereas the uric acid concentration in serum was significantly decreased. Therefore, the decrease in abdominal fat may be due to increased carnitine synthesis in the liver and hormone-sensitive lipase activity in abdominal fat94.
13.2. Laying hen
Unlike broiler chickens, the Met requirement of laying hens should be expressed as mg/day. For white egg-laying hens, a requirement of approximately 775-800 mg TSAA/hen/days of which about 390 to 440 mg was Met, was found for a maximum of 80-83 eggs/100 hen/days95. The NRC96 reported that the white-egg hens require 300 and 580 mg of Met and TSAA per hen daily, respectively, while the Met and TSAA requirements for the brown egg type of laying hens are 330 and 645/mg/hen/day, respectively. However, several researchers reported a higher requirement of Met for maximal egg production. It is reported the Met and TSAA requirements were around 424-440 and 740-811 mg per hen daily, respectively64,97-99. Thus, white egg-laying hens require lower TSAA than brown-egg laying hens, and commercial laying hens require higher TSAA than the NRC recommendation.
Consumption above 413 mg/day Met resulted in significantly increased albumen total solids and protein, and yolk protein significantly increased at 507 and 556 mg/day Met, compared to 413 mg/day Met100. The Methionine and TSAA requirements were greater for the middle and final quarters of production than for the initial quarter and also the peak daily requirements for Met were 384.380 and 402 mg/day for egg production, egg weight, and egg mass, respectively101. These data indicate that the requirement for maximum egg production is less than that for maximum feed utilization95-98 and the requirement for egg quality is higher than that for egg production and feed utilization.
These uncertain results may be due to a number of factors, such as environmental conditions, the management system, and dietary protein or energy levels. Therefore, Waldroup and Hellwig101 suggested that adjustments should be made in dietary amino acid levels to compensate for changes in daily feed intake as influenced by environmental changes, feather covering, or other factors in order to maintain a constant amino acid intake, although adjustment based on age or stage of production is not justified. However, based on a review of the literature, it seems that Met intake should be higher than 420 mg/day to maximize the quantity and quality of egg production.
13.3 Duck
Methionine is usually the first limiting amino acid for ducks102,103, which plays vital roles in protein synthesis, methylation process, and cellular antioxidant capacity 104,105. Thus, extensive studies on Met requirement and its role in the growth of ducks were conducted over the past decades103,106,107. The crystalline DL-Met is usually supplemented to balance the duck Met requirement of ducks. Theoretically, chemically synthesized DL-Met supplemented in the diet is a racemic mixture of equivalent D-Met and L-Met. The L-Met could be incorporated directly into the body with approximately 100% bioavailability, but D-Met must be converted to L-Met before the incorporation into protein108. Currently, L-Met, a new Met source, has been commercially available for duck diet formulation. The bio-efficacy of L-Met was approximately 1.4 times relative to DL-Met for the growth performance of starter ducks109 as well as gut oxidative status and development of chickens110. However, to date, few studies have evaluated the Met requirement of starter ducks by dietary L-Met supplementation. Metabolizable energy (ME) is an index to evaluate energy levels in duck diets. High ME levels in the broiler diet result in a reduction of feed intake111, which might influence the intake and utilization of other nutrients. Therefore, other nutrient requirements might be altered by dietary ME level. Previous studies showed that a higher dietary ME level required a greater lysine requirement for the starter phase of Pekin ducks112 and also a greater Met requirement level should be supplemented in the growing phase of Pekin ducks113.
The National Research Council96 reported the requirement of Met for ducks from hatch to 14 days of age is 0.40%. Chen et al.114 which showed that the Met requirement of ducks from hatch to 3 weeks of age is almost 34% and 42%, respectively.
13.4. Quail breeder
The best strategy to optimize production and reproduction in poultry species while also mitigating the harmful results of environmental conditions is proper nutrition59,115,116. Methionine is the first limiting amino acid in maize/soybean-based quail diets, its supplementation provides scope for improvement of protein quality and reduction of dietary protein concentration. Abou-Kassem117 found that the performance was significantly improved for quails fed a diet containing a Met level higher than the recommended level. Quails fed with Met diets showed higher hatchability and fertility than those fed the basal diet117. Kalvandi et al.118 clarified that the supplementation of Met in quail diets increased eggshell thickness and Haugh unit score, but did not affect the yolk and albumen percentages. The improvement of egg quality in groups fed different levels of Met may be due to the fact that Met enhances the antioxidant performance within the body119,120. Therefore, the addition of Met boosted the reproduction performance, egg quality, and egg production of quail breeders8.
13.5. Turkey
A fast growth rate in chickens and turkeys is dependent upon high dietary concentrations of essential amino acids, including Met32. Atkinson et al.121 indicated that Met addition to the basal diet produced highly significant increases in the rate of egg production varying from 7.73% to 9.73% over the basal-fed turkey hens. Body weight loss was significantly greater when the ration was supplemented with Met or a combination of lysine and Met56. Egg size increased when the basal ration was supplemented with Met or the combination of lysine and Met32.
Moran et al.122 indicated that low Met increased fat proportions at week 6 and also reported the fat deposition helped to minimize repercussions of the inadequate Met intake, most likely due to the dietary protein catabolism and subsequent fat deposition, as well as the increased uric-acid forming enzymes.
Park et al.123 reported that sufficient Met is important to keep reduced oxidative stress status in the gut and liver of turkey poultry and the use of L-Met as a source of Met replacing DL-Met seems to be beneficial to turkey poultry during 28 rearing days.
13.6. Guinea fowl
Guinea fowls are an important domestic fowl worldwide for leaner animal protein sources. The meat is lean and rich in essential fatty acids. Guinea fowl broilers have less abdominal fat, a leaner carcass, and lower cholesterol than chicken broilers when fed a comparative diet of 23% CP124. The requirement of Met and Cystine in the diet of French guinea fowl broilers was 0.45% and 0.35%, respectively, which is less than the requirement of chickens (In total 0.8% versus 0.9 % in a diet with 23% CP)125. In another study, the diet containing 0.45% Met and 0.35% Cystine at 0-3 weeks of age and the diet containing 0.50% Met and 0.40% Cystine at 4-8 weeks of age is recommended as efficient in French guinea fowl broilers126. Methionine was incorporated in at least 2.16% of the CP content of the respective diets in a study on Pearl Grey Guinea fowl122.
13.7. Gees
The geese are considered to have one of the fastest growth rates of old domesticated birds reared for the production of meat. The source of dietary protein of high quality with an adequate balance of amino acids is one of the most important factors in feeding Egyptian geese, in particular throughout the rearing phase8,127.
The supply of nutrients with adequate levels of CP and TSAA in geese' diets through the rearing stage exerts a substantial impact on subsequent reproduction performance. The dietary level of CP and amino acids should meet the maintenance requirements and production needs of various poultry kinds, in particular toward the mid and end of the fattening period. Abou Kassem et al.128 indicated that dietary levels of CP had significant impacts on feed intake and feed efficiency of growing Egyptian geese. The optimal dietary supplementation of Met could increase growth performance and Met and Cystine utilization in growing goslings129. Yuan et al.130 reported that better productive performance can be obtained with an adequate level of indispensable amino acids, especially Met. In another relevant study, Ashour et al.131 revealed that the consumption of diets with high levels of Met and Cystine can improve the productive performance, carcass, and meat quality of Egyptian geese during the rearing period. In the other investigation by Yang et al.132, it was found that optimal Met dietary supplementation could increase growth performance and serum total protein, albumin, as well as globulin, and hepatic protein synthesis in growing goslings.
14. Conclusion
The level of Met supplementation should be carefully considered due to breed, sex, and growing period. The amount of Met required to support the immune system seems to be high and depended on the animal species because it has to be used not only for protein synthesis but production of some antioxidants. The differences between DLM and LMA in absorption and utilization abilities under heat stress are still unclear because the absorption system is very complicated in poultry. However, LMA is usually used as a source of Met in most farms since the liquid form lets the farmers add it easily to the water.
   
This article was originally published in Journal of World's Poultry Science. 2022; 1(1): 1-11. http://jwpn.rovedar.com/. This is an Open Access article under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License.

1. El-Hack M, Mahgoub SA, Alagawany M, and Ashour EA. Improving productive performance and mitigating harmful emissions from laying hen excreta via feeding on graded levels of corn DDGS with or without Bacillus subtilis probiotic. J Anim Nutr. 2016; 101: 904-913. DOI: https://www.doi.org/ 10.1111/jpn.12522

2. Rehman AU, Arif M, Husnain MM, Alagawany M, El-Hack M, Taha AE, Elnesr SS, Abdel-Latif M, Othman SI, and Allam AA. Growth Performance of Broilers as Influenced by Different Levels and Sources of Met Plus Cystine. Anim. 2019; 9: p. 1056. DOI: https://www.doi.org/ 10.3390/ani9121056

3. Reda FM, Alagawany M, Mahmoud HK, Mahgoub SA, and Elnesr SS. Use of red pepper oil in quail diets and its effect on performance, carcass measurements, intestinal microbiota, antioxidant indices, immunity and blood constituents. Anim. 2019; 14: 1025-1033. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119002891

4. Bunchasak, C. Role of Dietary Met in Poultry Production. J Poult Sci. 2009; 46: 169-179. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.46.169

5. Elnesr, SS, Elwan HAM, Xu Q, Xie C, Dong X, and Zou X. Effects of in vivo injection of sulfur-containing amino acids on heat shock protein 70, corticosterone hormone, antioxidant indices, and lipid profile of newly hatched broiler chicks exposed to heat stress during incubation. Poult Sci. 2019; 98: 2290-2298. DOI: https://www.doi.org/ 10.3382/ps/pey609

6. Reda FM, Ismail IE, El-Mekkawy MM, Farag MR, Mahmoud HK, and Alagawany M. Dietary supplementation of potassium sorbate, hydrated sodium calcium almuniosilicate and Met enhances growth, antioxidant status and immunity in growing rabbits exposed to aflatoxin B1 in the diet. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2020; 104: 196- 203. DOI: https://www.doi.org/ 10.1111/jpn.13228

7. Kidd MT. Nutritional modulation of immune function in broilers. Poult Sci. 2004; 83: 650-657. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.4.650

8. Alagawany M, El-Hack M, Arif M, and Ashour EA. Individual and combined effects of crude protein, Met, and probiotic levels on laying hen productive performance and nitrogen pollution in the manure. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016; 23: 22906-22913. DOI: https://www.doi.org/ 10.1007/s11356-016-7511-6

9. Xiao X, Wang Y, Liu W, Ju T, and Zhan X. Effects of different Met sources on production and reproduction performance, egg quality and serum biochemical indices of broiler breeders. Asian-Australasian J Anim Sci. 2016; 30: 828–833. DOI: https://www.doi.org/ 10.5713/ajas.16.0404

10. Kaur D, Nagra SS, Sodhi S, and Dwivedi P. Comparative performance of commercial broilers fed Herbomethione® as a replacement for DLMet in diet. J Appl Anim Res. 2013; 41: 410-416. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2013.792731

11. Jankowski J, Kubinska M, and Tdunczyk Z. Nutritional and immunomodulatory function of Met in poultry diets-a review. Ann Anim Sci. 2014; 14: 17-32. DOI: https://www.doi.org/ 10.2478/ aoas-2013-0081

12. Fang YZ, Yang Z, and Wu G. Free radicals, antioxidants, and nutrition. Nutrition. 2002; 18: 872-879. DOI: https://www.doi.org/ 10.1016/s0899-9007(02)00916-4

13. Li P, Yin YL, Li D, Kim SW, and Wu G. Amino acids and immune function. Br J Nutr. 2007; 98(2): 237-252. DOI: https:// www.doi.org/ 10.1017/S000711450769936X

14. Luo S, and Levine RL Methionine in proteins defends against oxidative stress. FASEB J. 2009; 23: 464-472. DOI: https:// www.doi.org/ 10.1096/fj.08-118414

15. Del Vesco A. Gasparino PE, Neto ARO, Rossi RM, Soares MAM, and da Silva SCC. Effect of Methionine supplementation on mitochondrial genes expression in the breast muscle and liver of broilers. Livest Sci. 2013; 151: 284-291. Available at: https://www.core.ac.uk/download/pdf/82176032.pdf

16. Daenner E, and Bessei W. Influence of supplementation with liquid DL-Methionine hydroxy analogue-free acid (Alimet)or DL-Methionine on performance of broilers. J Appl Poult Res. 2003; 12: 101-105. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/japr/12.2.101

17. Motl M A, Fritts CA, and Waldroup PA. Influence of Dietary Sodium
Level on Utilization of Methionine from DL-Methionine and Liquid
Methionine-Hydroxy Analogue1. J Appl Poult Res. 2005; 14: 147-155.
DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/japr/14.1.147
18. Liu Y L, Song GL, Yi GF, Hou YQ, Huang JW, Vasquez-A ̃n ́on M, and
Knight CD. Effect of supplementing 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid and DL-Methionine in corn-soybean-cottonseed meal diets on growth performance and carcass quality of broilers.
Asian-Australas. J Anim Sci. 2006; 19: 1197-1205. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00071660701247814
19. Wallis IR. Dietary supplements of Methionine increase breast meat yield and decrease abdominal fat in growing broiler chickens.
Australian J Exper Agri. 1999; 39: 131-141. DOI: https:// www.doi.org/10.1071/EA98130
20. Mandal AB, Elangovan AV, and Johri TS. Comparing Bioefficacy of
Liquid DL-Methionine Hydroxy Analogue Free Acid with DLMethionine in Broiler Chickens. Asian-Australasian J Ani Sci. 2004;17:
102-108. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.102
21. Fanatico A. Pillai C P B, Emmert JL, and Owens CM. Meat quality of slow and fast-growing chicken genotypes fed low-nutrient or standard diets and raised indoors or with outdoor access. Poult Sci. 2007; 86: 2245-
2255. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.10.2245
22. Aksu M. Imik IH, and Karaoglu M. Influence of dietary sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) and corn supplemented with methionine on CutUp pieces weights of broiler carcass and quality properties of breast and drumsticks meat. Food Sci Technol Int. 2007; 13: 361-367. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1082013207085686
23. Albrecht A, Herbert U, Miskel D, Heinemann C, Braun C, Dohlen S,
Zeitz J, Eder K, Saremi B, and Kreyenschmidt J. Effect of Methionine supplementation in chicken feed on the quality and shelf life of fresh poultry meat. Poult Sci. 2017; 96 (8): 2853-2861. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex071
24. Rostagno HS and Barbosa WA. Biological efficacy and absorption of DLMethionine hydroxy analogue free acid compared to DL-Methionine in chickens as affected by heat stress. British Poult Sci. 1995; 36: 303-312.
DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00071669508417777
25. Chavez C, Coufal CD, Lacey RE, and Carey JB. The impact of Methionine source on poultry fecal matter odor volatiles. Poult Sci. 2004; 83: 359-
364. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.3.359
26. Harper AE, Benevenga NJ and Wohlhueter RM. Effects of ingestion of disproportionate amounts of amino acids. Physiological Reviews. 1970;
50: 428-558. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1970.50.3.428
27. Han Y and Baker DH. Effects of excess Methionine or lysine for broilers fed a corn-soybean meal diet. Poult Sci. 1993; 72: 1070-1074.
DOI: https://www.doi.org/ 10.3382/ps.0721070
28. Aldrich G. DL-Methionine Several vital Function in Pet food
Industry Watt Publishing Company Rockford IL USA. 2007; pp.42-43.
Available at: http://www.Petfoodindustry.com/ViewArticle.Aspx?
Id=18526
29. Dilger RN and Baker DH. DL-Methionine is as efficacious as L-Methionine, but modest L-Cystine excesses are anorexigenic in sulfur amino aciddeficient purified and practical type diets fed to chicks. Poult Sci. 2007;
86: 2367-2374. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00203
30. Baker DH and Boebel KP. Utilization of the D- and L-isomers of
Methionine and Methionine hydroxy analogue as determined by chick bioassay. J Nutr. 1980; 110: 959-964. DOI: https://www.doi. org/10.1093/jn/110.5.959
31. Noll SL, Waibel PE, Cook DR and Witmer JA. Biopotency of Methionine sources for young turkeys. Poult Sci. 1984; 63: 2458-2470.
32. Baker DH, Halpin KM, Czarnecki GL and Parsons CM. The cholineMethionine interrelationship for growth of the chick. Poult Sci. 1983;
62: 133-137. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0620133
33. Hasegawa H, Shinohara Y, Akahane K and Hashimoto T. Direct detection and evaluation of conversion of D-Methionine into LMethionine in rats by stable isotope methodology. J Nutr. 2005; 135:
2001-2005. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/jn/135.8.2001
34. Moritz J S, Parsons AS, Buchanan NP, Baker NJ, Jaczynski J, Gekara OJ and Bryan WB. Synthetic Methionine and feed restriction effects on performance and meat quality of organically reared broiler chickens. J Applied Poult Res. 2005; 14: 521-535. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/japr/14.3.521
35. Upadhyaya I, Arsi K, Fanatico A, Wagle BR, Shrestha S, Upadhyay A,
Coon CN, Schlumbohm M, Trushenski J, Owens C, Riaz MN, Farnell MB,
Donoghue DJ, and Donoghue AM. Bigheaded Carp-Based Meal as a
Sustainable and Natural Source of Methionine in Feed for Ecological and Organic Poultry Production. J Applied Poult Res. 2019; 28(4):
1131-1142. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfz077
36. Soriano-Garcia JF, Torras-Llort M, Moret´o M and Ferrer R. Regulation of L-Methionine and L-lysine uptake in chicken jejunal brush-border membrane by dietary Methionine. The J of Physio Regulatory,
Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 1998: 509: 527-539. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1999.277.6.R1654
37. Noy Y and Sklan D. Uptake capacity in vitro for glucose and
Methionine and in situ for oleic acid in the proximal small intestine of post-hatch chicks. Poult Sci. 1996; 75: 998-1002. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750998
38. Knight CD and Dibner JJ. Comparative absorption of hydroxy- - (methylthio)-butanoic acid and L-Methionine in. the broiler chick. J
Nutr. 1984; 114: 2179-2186. DOI: https://www.doi.org/
10.1093/jn/114.11.2179
39. Pan Y, Wong EA, Dibner JJ, V´azquez-A˜no´n M and Webb Jr KE.
Poly(A) RNA encoding proteins capable of transporting L-Methionine and/or DL- -hydroxy- -(methylthio). butanoic acid are present in the intestinal mucosa of broilers. J Nutr. 2002; 132: 382-386.
40. Dibner JJ, Atwell CA and Ivey FJ. Effect of heat stress on hydroxy- - (methylthio) butanoic acid and DL-Methionine. absorption measured in vitro. Poult Sci. 1992; 71: 1900-1910. DOI: https://www.doi.org10.3382/ps.0711900
41. Brachet P and Puigserver A. Na-independent and non-stereo specific transport of hydroxy- -methylthiobutanoic. acid by brush border membrane vesicles from chick small intestine. Comparative
Biochemistry and Physiology. 1987; 117: 1241-1246.
42. Naiara S. Fagundes C. Milfort M. Williams M, Da Costa J, Alberta L. Fuller
F, Rekaya M, and Samuel E. Aggrey. Dietary Methionine level alters growth, digestibility, and gene expression of ami 

43. Brody T. In Nutritional Biochemistry Sec ed. 1999. DOI: https://www.doi.Org/10.1080/07315724.2000.10718940
44. Partlin J. In Encyclopedia of Human Nutrition Sec ed. 2005 Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/books/encyclopedia-of-humannutrition/allen/978-0-08-045428-3
45. Graber G and Baker DH. Sulfur amino acid nutrition of the growing chick: Quantitative aspects concerning the efficacy of dietary
Methionine, Cystine and Cystine. J Ani Sci.1971; 33: 1005-1011. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.2527/jas1971.3351005x
46. Sasse CE and Baker DH. Sulfur utilization by the chick with emphasis on the effect of inorganic sulfate on the Cystine,
Methionine interrelationship. J Nutr. 2000; 104: 244-251. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/jn/104.2.244
47. Plavnik Y and Bornstein S. The sparing action of inorganic sulphate on sulphur amino acids in practical broiler diets: The replacement of some of the supplementary Methionine in broiler finisher diets. British Poult Sci. 1978; 19: 159-167. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00071667808416459
48. Mendoza C. Effect of genetically modified low phytic acid plants on mineral absorption. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2002; 37: 759-67. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2621.2002.00624.x
49. Vieira SL, Lemme A, Goldenberg DB and Brugalli I. Responses of growing broilers to diets with increased sulfur amino acids to lysine ratios at two dietary protein levels. Poult Sci. 2004; 83: 1307-1313.
DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.8.1307
50. Bornstein S and Lipstein B. Methionine supplementation of practical broiler rations: III. The value of added Methionine in broiler finisher rations. British Poult Sci. 1966; 7: 273-284. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00071666608415633
51. Mendonca CX and Jensen LS. Influence of protein concentration on the sulphur-containing amino acid requirement of broiler chickens. British
Poult Sci. 1989; 30: 889-898. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/
00071668908417215
52. Huyghebaert G and Pack M. Effects of dietary protein content, addition of nonessential amino acids and dietary Methionine to
Cystine balance on responses to dietary Sulphur containing amino acids in broilers. British Poult Sci. 1996; 37: 623-639. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00071669608417892
53. Boomgaardt J and Baker DH. Effect of dietary energy concentration on sulfur amino acid requirements and body composition of young chicks. J Ani Sci. 1973; 36: 307-311. DOI: https://www.doi.org/
10.2527/jas1973.362307x
54. Morris TR and Gous RM. Partitioning of the response to protein between egg number and egg weight. British Poult Sci. 1988; 29: 93-
99. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00071668808417030
55. Fatufe AA and Rodehutscord M. Growth, body composition, and marginal efficiency of Methionine utilization are affected by nonessential amino acid nitrogen supplementation in male broiler chicken. Poult Sci. 2005; 84: 1584-1592. DOI: https://www.doi. org/10.1093/ps/84.10.1584
56. Sterling KG, Pesti GM and Bakalli RI. Performance of different broiler genotypes fed diets with varying levels of dietary CP and lysine. Poult Sci.
2006; 85: 1045-1054. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.6.1045
57. Poeikhampa T. Effect of dietary protein and Methionine level on laying performance and chemical body composition of laying hen raised in closed house system. Master Thesis, Kasetsart Uni. 2004; pp.90.
58. Jankowski J, Mikulski D, Mikulska M, Ognik K, Całyniuk Z, Mróz E, and
Zduńczyk Z. The effect of different dietary ratios of arginine,
Methionine, and lysine on the performance, carcass traits, and immune status of turkeys. Poult Sci. 2020; 99 (2): 1028-1037. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.008
59. Elsharkawy MS, Chen Y, Liu R, Tan X, Li W, El-Wardany I, Zhao D,
Zheng M, Wen J, and Zhao G. Paternal Dietary Methionine
Supplementation Improves Carcass Traits and Meat Quality of
Chicken Progeny. Anim. 2021; 11(2): p. 325. DOI: https://www.doi. org/10.3390/ani11020325
60. Liu R, Tan X, Zhao G, Chen Y, Zhao D, Li W, Zheng M, and Wen J. Maternal dietary Methionine supplementation influences egg production and the growth performance and meat quality of the offspring. Poult Sci. 2020;
99(7): 3550-3556. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.03.043
61. Rehman AU, Arif M, Husnain MM, Alagawany M, Abd El-Hack ME, Taha
AE, Elnesr SS, Abdel-Latif MA, Othman SI, and Allam AA. Growth
Performance of Broilers as Influenced by Different Levels and Sources of Methionine Plus Cystine. Ani. 2019; 9(12): p. 1056. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/ani9121056
62. Gonzalez-Esquerra R and Leeson S. Physiological and metabolic responses of broilers to heat stress implications for protein and amino acid nutrition. World’s Poult Sci J. 2006; 62: 282-295. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1079/WPS200597
63. Austic RE. Feeding poultry in hot and cold climates. In: Stress
Physiology in Livestock CRC Press. Boca Raton FL. 1985; pp: 123-136.
64. Bunchasak C and Silapasorn T. Effects of adding Methionine in lowprotein diet on production performance, reproductive organs and chemical liver composition of laying hens under tropical conditions.
International J Poult Sci. 2005; 4: 301-305. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2005.301.308
65. Sekiz SS, Scott ML and Nesheim MC. The effect of Methionine deficiency on body weight, food and energy utilization in the chick. Poult Sci. 1975;
54: 1184-1188. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0541184
66. Waldroup PW, Mitchell RI, Payne JR and Hazen KR. Performance of chicks fed diets formulated to minimize excess levels of essential amino acids. Journal of Poult Sci. 1976; 55: 243-253. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0550243
67. Waldroup PW. Influence of environmental temperature on protein and amino acid needs of poultry. Federation Proceeding. 1982: 41: 2821-
2823. Available at: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6811330/
68. Sell DR and Rogler JC. The effect of sorghum tannin and Methionine on the performance of laying hens maintained in two temperature environments. Poult Sci. 1983; 63: 109-116. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0630109
69. Summers JD, Atkinson JL and Spratt D. Supplementation of a low protein diet in an attempt to optimize egg mass output. Canadian J Ani
Sci. 1991; 71: 211-220. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.4141/cjas91-
023
70. Harms RH, and Russell GB. Optimizing egg mass with amino acid supplementation of a low-protein diet. Poult Sci. 1993: 72: 1892-
1896. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0721892
71. Chung HJ, Chung-Yi L, and Wen-Shyg P. Effects of ambient temperature and Methionine supplementation of a low protein diet on the performance of laying hens. Anim Feed Sci and Tech. 1998: 74:
289-299. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.011081
72. Ravikiran D, and Devegowda G. Effects of DL-Methionine supplementation in the ration of commercial layers during summer.
Indian J Poult Sci. 1998; 33: 279-283.
73. Mahmoudi M, Azarfar A, and Khosravinia H. Partial Replacement of
Dietary Methionine with Betaine and Choline in Heat-Stressed
Broiler Chickens. J Poult Sci. 2018; 55(1): 28-37. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0170087
74. Amaefule KU, Ojewola GS and Uchegbu EC. The effect of Methionine, lysine and/or Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) supplementation on egg production and egg quality characteristics of layers in the humid tropics. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 2004 Available at: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd16/9/amae16064.htm
75. Grimble R.F. The effects of sulfur amino acid intake on immune function in humans. J Nutr. 2006; 136: 1660–1665. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.6.1660S
76. Kim WK, Froelich CA Jr, Patterson PH and Ricke SC. The potential to reduce poultry nitrogen emissions with dietary Methionine or
Methionine analogues supplementation. World’s Poult Sci J. 2006; 62:
338-353. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1079/WPS2005103
77. Li P, Yin YL, Li D, Kim SW, and Wu G. Amino acids and immune function. Br. J. Nutr. 2007; 98: 237–252. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S000711450769936X
78. Swain BK, and Johri TS. Effect of supplemental Methionine, choline and their combinations on the performance and immune response of broilers. British Poult Sci. 2000; 41: 83-88. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00071660086457
79. Attia YA, Hassan RA, Shehatta MH, and Abd El-Hady Slawa B. Growth, carcass quality and serum constituents of slow-growing chicks as affected by betaine addition to diets containing, Different levels of
Methionine. Inter J Poult Sci. 2005; 4: 856-865. DOI: https://www.doi.org/ 10.3923/ijps.2005.856.865
80. Tsiagbe VK, Cook ME, Harper AE and Sunde ML. Enhanced immune responses in broiler chicks fed Methionine supplemented diets. Poult Sci.
1987; 66: 1147-1154. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0661147
81. Calder PC. Branched-chain amino acid and immunity. J Nutr. 2006 136: 288S–293S. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.1.288S
82. Wu B, Li L, Ruan T, and Peng X. Effect of Methionine deficiency on duodenal and jejunal IgA+ B cell count and immunoglobulin level of broilers. Iran J Vet Res. 2018; 19(3): 165-171. Available at: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30349561
83. Yaqoob MU, and Ali M. Growth and Immune Response of Broilers in
Relation to Varying Dietary levels of Methionine and Threonine. Int J
Bio tech Recent Adv. 2018; 1(1): 6-11. DOI: https://www.doi.org/
10.18689/ijbr-1000102
84. Takahashi K, Ohta N, and Akiba Y. Influences of dietary Methionine and Cystine on metabolic responses to immunological stress by
Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide injection, and mitogenic response in broiler chickens. Brit. J. Nutr. 1997; 78: 815-821. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1079/BJN19970197
85. Picard ML, Uzu G, Dunnington EA and Siegel PB. Food intake adjustments of chicks: Short term reactions to deficiencies in lysine,
Methionine and tryptophan. British Poult Sci. 1993; 34: 737-746. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00071669308417632
86. Bingham S. Dictionary of Nutrition. London: Barrie and Jenkins. 1977.
Available at: http://www.sciepub.com/reference/41733
87. Chalova V, Kim J, Patterson P, Ricke S and Kim W. Reduction of nitrogen excretion and emissions from poultry: A review for conventional poultry. World's Poult Sci. 2016; 72(3): 509-520. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0043933916000477
88. Vesela I, Kim CG, Paul H, Patterson C, and Woo K. Reduction of nitrogen excretion and emission in poultry: A review for organic poultry, J
Environmental Sci and Health. 2016; 51: 4: 230-235. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2015.1120616
89. National Organic Standards Board Technical Advisory Panel Review for the USDA National Organic Program. Methionine Livestock. 2001.
Washington DC. USA. Available at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/ default/files/media/Mth%20Technical%20Advisory%20Panel%20R eport%20%282001%29.pdf
90. EFSA FEEDAP Panel. Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Llysine monohydrochloride produced by fermentation with Escherichia coli for all animal species based on a dossier submitted by HELM AG on behalf of Meihua Holdings Group Co. Ltd EFSA J. 2015; 13(3): p.
4052. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4052
91. EFSA FEEDAP Panel, Guidance on studies concerning the safety of use of the additive for users/workers. EFSA J. 2012; 10(1): p. 2539. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2539
92. Bunchasak C, and Keawarun N. Effect of Methionine hydroxy analog-free acid on growth performance and chemical composition of liver of broiler chicks fed a corn-soybean based diet from 0 to 6weeks of age. Ani Sci
J. 2006; 77: 95-102. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-
0929.2006.00325.x
93. Geraert PA, Leclercq B and Larbier M. Effects of dietary glucogenic amino acid supplementation on growth performance, body composition and plasma free amino acid levels in genetically lean and fat chickens. Reproduction, Nutrition and Development. 1987; 27:
1041-1051. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19870807
94. Zhan XA, Li JX, Xu ZR, and Zhao RQ. Effects of Methionine and betaine supplementation on growth performance, carcass composition and metabolism of lipids in male broilers. British Poult Sci. 2006; 47: 576-
580. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00071660600963438
95. Schutte JB and van Weerden EJ. Requirement of the hen for Sulphur containing amino acids. British Poult Sci. 1983; 24: 319-326. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00071667808416516
96. NRC. Nutrient Requirement for Poultry, 3th Ed. National Academy
Press, Washington DC, USA1994 DOI: https://www.doi.org/3. 101-
101. 10.1093/japr/3.1.101
97. Cao Z, Jevne CJ and Coon CN. The Methionine requirement of laying hens as affected by dietary protein levels. Poult Sci. 1992; 71: p. 39.
DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2020.232.243
98. Schutte JB, De Jong J, and Bertram HL. Requirement of the laying hen for sulfur amino acids. Poult Sci. 1994; 73: 274-280. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0730274
99. Novak C, Yakout H, and Scheideler S. The combined effects of dietary lysine and total sulfur amino acid level on egg production parameters and egg components in Dekalb Delta laying hens. Poult Sci. 2004; 83:
977-984. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.6.977
100. Shafer DJ, Carey JB, Prochaska JF, and Sams AR. Dietary Methionine intake effects on egg component yield, composition, functionality, and texture profile analysis. Poult Sci. 1998; 77: 1056-1062. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.7.1056
101. Waldroup PW and Hellwig HM. Methionine and total sulfur amino acid requirements influenced by stage of production. J Poult Res.
1995; 4: 183-292. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/japr/4.3.283
102. Elkin RG, Stewart TS, and Rogler JC. Methionine requirement of male
White Pekin ducklings. Poult Sci. 1986; 65: 1771-1776. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0651771
103. Xie M, Hou SS, and Huang W. Methionine requirements of male white
Peking ducks from twenty-one to forty-nine days of age. Poult Sci. 2006;
85(4): 743-746. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.4.743
104. Wen C, Jiang XY, Ding LR, Wang T, and Zhou YM. Effects of dietary
Methionine on growth performance, meat quality and oxidative status of breast muscle in fast- and slow-growing broilers. Poult Sci. 2017; 96:
1707-1714. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew432
105. Liu G, Zong K, Zhang L, and Cao S. Dietary Methionine affect meat quality and myostatin gene exon 1 region methylation in skeletal muscle tissues of broilers. Agric Sci China. 2010; 9: 1338-1346. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1671-2927(09)60224-8
106. Xie M, Hou SS, Huang W, Zhao L, Yu JY, Li WY, and Wu YY.
Interrelationship between Methionine and Cystine of early
Peking ducklings. Poult. Sci. 2004; 83: 1703-1708. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.10.1703
107. Ruan D, Fouad AM, Fan Q, Xia W, Wang S, Chen W, Lin C, Wang Y, Yang L, and Zheng C. Effects of dietary Methionine on productivity, reproductive performance, antioxidant capacity, ovalbumin and antioxidant-related gene expression in laying duck breeders. Br. J Nutr. 2018; 119: 121-130.
DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517003397
108. Chung TK, and Baker DH. Utilization of Methionine isomers and analogs by the pig. Can. J Anim Sci. 1992; 72: 185-188. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.4141/cjas92-024
109. Zhang YN, Xu RS, Min L, Ruan D, Kim HY, Hong YG, Chen W, Wang S,
Xia WG, Luo X, and et al. Effects of L-Methionine on growth performance, carcass quality, feather traits, and small intestinal morphology of Pekin ducks compared with conventional
DL-Methionine. Poult Sci. 2019; 98: 6866-6872. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez438
110. Shen YB, Ferket P, Park I, Malheiros RD, and Kim SW. Effects of feed grade l-Methionine on intestinal redox status, intestinal development, and growth performance of young chickens compared with conventional dl-Methionine. J Anim Sci. 2015; 93: 2977-2986.
DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-8898
111. Leeson S, Caston L, and Summers JD. Broiler response to diet energy.
Poult. Sci. 1996; 75: 529–535. DOI: https://www.doi.org/
10.3382/ps.0750529
112. Wen ZG, Rasolofomanana TJ, Tang J, Jiang Y, Xie M, Yang PL, and Hou
SS. Effects of dietary energy and lysine levels on growth performance and carcass yields of Pekin ducks from hatch to 21 days of age. Poult. Sci. 2017; 96: 3361-3366. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex122
113. Wu YB, Tang J, Xie M, Zhao R, Huang W, Zhang Q, Hou SS. Effects of dietary energy and Methionine on growth performance and carcass traits of growing Pekin ducks from 15 to 42 days of age. Poult Sci. 2019;
98: 5870–5875. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez332
114. Ming‐Tsao Chen, Sun‐San Lin and Liang‐Chuan Lin. Effect of stresses before slaughter on changes to the physiological, biochemical and physical characteristics of duck muscle. British Poult Sci. 1991; 32(5):
997-1004. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00071669108417424
115. El-Hack M, Mahgoub SA, Alagawany M, Ashour EA. Improving productive performance and mitigating harmful emissions from laying hen excreta via feeding on graded levels of corn DDGS with or without Bacillus sub tilisprobiotic. J Anim Physiology Anim Nutr.
2016; 101: 904-913. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12522
116. Reda FM, Alagawany M, Mahmoud HK, Mahgoub SA, and Elnesr SS.
Use of red pepper oil in quail diets and its effect on performance, carcass measurements, intestinal microbiota, antioxidant indices, immunity and blood constituents. Anim. 2019; 14: 1025-1033. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119002891
117. Abou-Kassem DE. A Study on Some Factors Influencing Egg
Production and Incubation in Quail. Master’s Thesis, Faculty of
Agriculture, Zagazig Uni Zagazig Egypt. 2006.
118. Kalvandi O, Sadeghi G, and Karimi A. Methionine supplementation improves reproductive performance, antioxidant status, immunity and maternal antibody transmission in breeder Japanese quail under heat stress conditions. Arch Anim Breed. 2019; 62: 275-286. DOI:
Babazadeh D and Ahmadi Simab P. / Journal of World's Poultry Science. 2022; 1(1): 1-11.
11 https://www.doi.org/10.5194/aab-62-275-2019
119. Vazquez-Anon M, González-Esquerra R, Saleh E, Hampton T, Ritcher
S, Firman J, and Knight CD. Evidence for 2-Hydroxy-4(Methylthio)
Butanoic Acid and dl-Methionine Having Different Dose Responses in
Growing Broilers. Poult. Sci. 2006; 85: 1409-1420. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.8.1409
120. Gonzalez-Esquerra R, and Leeson S. Effect of Arginine: Lysine Ratios and Source of Methionine on Growth and Body Protein Accretion in
Acutely and Chronically Heat-Stressed Broilers. Poult. Sci. 2006; 85:
1594-1602. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.9.1594
121. Atkinson RL, Krueger KK, Bradley JW, and Krueger WF. Amino acid supplementation of low protein turkey starting rations. Poult Sci. 1976;
55(4): 1572-1575. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0551572
122. Moran ET. Response of broiler strains differing in body fat to inadequate methionine: live performance and processing yields. Poultry Sci. 1994;
73: 1116-1126. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0731116
123. Park I, Pasquetti T, Malheiros RD, Ferket PR, and Kim SW. Effects of supplemental L-methionine on growth performance and redox status of turkey poultry compared with the use of DL-methionine1
1Financial support from North Carolina Agricultural Foundation (Raleigh, NC) and CJ CheilJedang Co. (Seoul, Korea). Poult Sci. 2018;
97(1): 102-109. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex259
124. Nahashon SN, Aggrey S E, Adefope N A, and Amenyenu A. Modeling growth characteristics of meat-type guinea fowl. Poult Sci. 2006;
85(5): 943-946. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.5.943
125. Johnson D. Evaluation of Met and Cystine requirements of the French guinea fowl broiler. 2015. Available at: https://digitalscholarship. tnstate.edu/dissertations/AAI1592023
126. CeeDee R. Evaluation of Met and Cystine Requirements for Optimal
Growth Performance of the French Guinea Fowl Broiler ETD
Collection for Tennessee State Uni. 2019. Available at: https://digitalscholarship.tnstate.edu/dissertations/AAI22617001/
127. Alagawany M, Abd El-Hack ME, Laudadio V, and Tufarelli V. Effect of
Low-Protein Diets with Crystalline Amino Acid Supplementation on
Egg Production, Blood Parameters and Nitrogen Balance in
Laying Japanese Quail. Avian Biol Res. 2014; 7: 235-243. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3184/175815514X14152945166603
128. Abou-Kassem DE, Ashour EA, Alagawany M, Mahrose KM, Ur Rehman
Z, and Ding C. Effect of Feed Form and Dietary Protein Level on
Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Growing
Geese. Poult. Sci. 2019; 98: 761-770. DOI: https://www.doi
.org/10.3382/ps/pey445
129. Yang Z, Wang ZY, Yang HM, Zhao FZ, and Kong LL. Response of growing goslings to dietary supplementation with methionine and betaine. Poult. Sci. 2016; 57: 833-841. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2016.1230663
130. Yuan J, Karimi AJ, Goodgame SD, Lu C, Mussini F J, and Waldroup PW.
Evaluation of herbal methionine source in broiler diets. Int J Poult.
Sci. 2012; 11: 247-250. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1.1.1040./9771
131. Ashour EA, Abou-Kassem DE, Abd El-Hack ME, and Alagawany M.
Effect of Dietary Protein and TSAA Levels on Performance, Carcass
Traits, Meat Composition and Some Blood Components of Egyptian
Geese During the Rearing Period. Animals. 2020; 10(4): p. 549. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/ani10040549
132. Yang Z, Wang Z Y, Yang HM, Xu L, and Gong DQ. Effects of dietary methionine and betaine on slaughter performance, biochemical and enzymatic parameters in goose liver and hepatic composition.
Anim Sci. 2017; 228: 48-58. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/ j.anifeedsci.2017.04.00

Related topics:
Authors:
Daryoush Babazadeh
Recommend
Comment
Share
Gene Pesti
University of Georgia
17 de septiembre de 2023
This is an interesting review. However, there are two or three important dietary interactions that have been overlooked.
First, it is mentioned that methionine is necessary for the synthesis of choline, but I couldn't find anything on the re-methylation of homocysteine by betaine to form methionine. The re-methlyation of homocysteine is accomplished by betaine in the feed or that is formed in the oxidation of choline. There are a number of papers on this subject not related to heat stress or old laying hens as reported in this review. I believe betaine is the reason that some organic producers think hens have a lower methionine requirement on wheat-based diets compared to corn based diets. Wheat naturally has rather high levels of betaine while levels in corn are not measurable.
Second, there is a strong, negative, interaction between methionine and copper levels when copper is fed at pharmacological, growth promoting, levels. Pharmacological copper has long been fed and known to act in a similar manner to antibiotic feeding. However, without adequate supplementation of methionine the high levels of copper will actually diminish growth. The best responses were found with high levels of both. An interesting point is that high levels of copper in poultry manure may be a good way to provide copper to forages for cattle, but not for sheep.
Methionine requirements have always been particularly difficult to quantitate. We teach that to determine requirements for any nutrient, feed a basal diet with adequate or excessive levels of all other nutrients. Low cystine, or (choline + betaine), or folate, or vitamin B12 levels, or high copper, will make methionine requirements appear abnormally high. In the same manner, low methionine levels will make requirements for the other nutrients appear abnormally high. Folate and vitamin B12 are necessary for the proper processing of the raw materials, labile methyl groups, that come from methionine, choline or betaine or dimethylthetin. And then any excesses of dietary amino acids that have to be oxidized to uric acid, or arginine that is converted to creatine, increase labile methyl group needs that must come from methionine, choline (betaine) or dimethylthetin. And then excess copper can complicate requirements further. The key may be to provide adequate levels of the least expensive nutrients first, and then the most expensive, under each set of dietary conditions (broilers, layers, breeders, etc.)
Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.