Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

Assessment of limiting dietary amino acids in broiler chickens offered reduced crude protein diets

Published: August 24, 2023
By: Craig W. Maynard 1,2; Michael T. Kidd 1; Peter V. Chrystal 2,3; Leon R. McQuade 4; Bernie V. McInerney 4; Peter H. Selle 2,5; Sonia Y. Liu 2,3.
Summary

Author details:

1 Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, United States; 2 Poultry Research Foundation, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, 425 Werombi Road, Camden, NSW, 2570, Australia; 3 School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; 4 Australian Proteome Analysis Facility, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia; 5 Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.

1. Introduction
As feed grade amino acids are commercialized at prices that are economically feasible for including in industry poultry diets, nutritionists are able to better supply diets containing amino acid profiles more closely representing ideal amino acid profiles (Baker, 1997). Refinement of dietary amino acid profiles allows for reductions in crude protein (CP), inclusion levels of protein-rich ingredients in the diet and nitrogen excretion in broiler chickens (Kidd et al., 2002; Waldroup et al., 2005b). As dietary CP levels are reduced, a progression of amino acids become limiting for growth and must be fortified to ideal amino acid levels to allow for optimal growth. Previous studies have implemented drastic reductions in dietary CP or specialized diets to determine the limiting order of amino acids in corn and soybean-based diets or diets created to focus on one ingredient (Edmonds et al., 1985; Fernandez et al., 1994; Wang et al., 1997; Wang and Parsons, 1998; Peter et al., 2000). These studies have displayed that the order of limiting amino acids differs by feed ingredients and total dietary composition (Kidd and Hackenhaar, 2006).
Practical reduction in CP involves 2 to 3 percentage point reductions from breeder recommendation (Chrystal et al., 2019) and understanding how these reductions impact performance and carcass traits due to the potential development of amino acid limitation is of paramount importance to ensure balanced amino acid supplementation. Not only should limitations caused by traditional essential amino acids be evaluated but also conditionally essential amino acids, such as Gly, or amino acids needed to be considered in tandem, such as Phe + Tyr instead of Phe alone. In the case of the aforementioned Phe + Tyr and glycine equivalence (Glyequi), it is nutritionally disingenuous to only consider the 'essential' portion of their requirements and disregard their 'nonessential' counterparts due to the sparing action observed by dietary inclusion of the non-essential portion (Almquist, 1947). As least-cost formulation software provides insight on the limiting amino acids in poultry diets, experimental determination allows for observation of potential negative effects of amino acid deficiencies on economic outcomes based on growth performance and carcass yield (Si et al., 2004).
The order of limiting amino acids of a given diet can be determined in growth studies using either an addition or deletion assay. Addition assay adds supplemented amino acids one by one into a basal diet containing minimal amount of synthetic amino acids, the cumulative response of the additions is often evaluated; whereas a fully supplemented diet is used in a deletion assay and one supplemented amino acid is taken out at one time. Of the two, deletion assays have been found to be more effective (Baker, 1989; Wang, 1997).
Whether amino acids are derived from intact protein or supplementation in feed could alter energy requirement in poultry. It was reported in human, energy requirement may vary when offering diets rich in intact protein, hydrolysed protein or non-bound amino acids (Rose et al., 1954). Later studies in poultry and rats found that decreasing energy levels resulted in decreased nitrogen retention and increased total feed intake (Munro and Naismith, 1953; Fisher and Shapiro, 1961). This may be due to animals were responding to the first limiting nutrient, increasing total feed intake in order to maintain protein intake target (Gous et al., 2018). Recent studies utilizing conventional diets have shown that a moderate increase of energy ranging from 0.29 to 0.46 MJ/kg had no effect (Maynard et al., 2019) or minor influence on feed intake and feed conversion (Gopinger et al., 2017; Johnson et al., 2020). However, increased relative fat pad weight to body weight was observed in broiler chickens offered low-CP diets (Chrystal et al., 2020a; Greenhalgh et al., 2020) which suggests surplus dietary energy may have been provided in diets containing lower CP and higher nonbound amino acids. The shift from intact protein to non-bound amino acids in low-CP diets may reduce energy requirement in broiler chickens because non-bound amino acids do not require digestion and are immediately available for absorption. Therefore, reducing dietary energy may improve carcass quality without compromising growth performance.
Various studies have determined the order of limiting amino acids in maize-soybean meal diets due to it being the most typical broiler diet worldwide (Schwartz and Bray, 1975; Edmonds et al., 1985; Holsheimer and Janssen, 1991; Fernandez et al., 1994; Maynard et al., 2020). Differences in global climates dictate the composition of broiler diets based on the availability of feedstuffs locally. Broiler diets are primarily based on wheat in Australia and Europe due to the high importation cost of maize and relative shortage of rainfall. Because of this, experimental determination of the order of limiting amino acids in wheat-based diets is of particular interest to these regions. More importantly, very few studies in the literature reported nutrient digestibility and utilization data to understand the response observed in growth performance. Therefore, 2 concurrent experiments were conducted to determine the limiting order of amino acids in a low-CP wheatbased diet, and the effects of serial amino acid deletions on energy utilization, protein digestibility, and plasma amino acid levels.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Animal ethics
This study was approved by the Research Integrity and Ethics Administration of The University of Sydney (2019/1651).
2.2. Experimental diets
An industry control (IC) diet was formulated at 210.0 g/kg CP to reflect diets currently used in the Australian chicken meat industry; containing wheat, whole canola seed, and soybean meal (Table 1). The CP of this diet was then reduced by 30 g/kg but Lys, total sulphur amino acids (TSAA), and Thr levels were maintained. Consequently, non-bound amino acids were supplemented to match the amino acid profile of the IC diet for Val, Ile, Leu, Trp, Arg, His, Phe + Tyr, Glyequi, and Pro, as described in Waldroup et al. (2005b). These additions led to the final dietary CP of 186.7 g/kg in the positive control (PC) diet. A negative control (NC) diet was created by reducing N corrected apparent metabolizable energy (AMEN) by 0.5 MJ/kg and removing all of the supplemental amino acids from the PC and replacing them with nonessential N in the form of Glu at the expense of filler to maintain a CP of 186.7 g/kg. Each of the supplemented amino acids or groups of amino acids (e.g., Phe + Tyr and Glyequi) were then serial deleted from the PC resulting in the 9 deletion diets that are identified by their respective 3-letter codes: Val, Ile, Leu, Trp, Arg, His, Phe + Tyr, Glyequi, and Pro. An additional diet, coded ‘Energy’, was created by reducing the energy content of the PC by 0.5 MJ/kg. Any variance in dietary volume among the treatments was brought up to 1,000 g/kg with sand. An inert marker, acid insoluble ash (AIA), was added at 20 g/kg to allow for determination of N digestibility values. All diets were mixed in a vertical screw mixer and steam pelleted at 80 C. The extent to which the amino acid levels were reduced can be found in Table 2.
Samples of all experimental diets were collected and stored at 1 C. Subsamples were then taken and analyzed for CP and amino acids (AOAC method 990.03; 994.12; 982.30; 988.15). A second feed sample was collected and used to determine pellet durability index (PDI) for each diet. One-hundred-gram samples were assessed in triplicate using a Holmen Pellet Tester (New Holmen NHP200 Series 2 Pellet Durability Tester, TekPro Ltd., Willow Park, North Walsham, Norfolk, UK) with a 3-mm screen.
2.3. Experiment 1 -- digestibility study
A total of 312 off-sex Ross 308 male broiler chicks (parent line) were obtained from a commercial hatchery and transported to the Poultry Research Foundation poultry farm. They were offered a common starter (235.0 g/kg CP, 12.13 MJ/kg) from d 0 to 14. On d 15, 4 broilers were group weighed and randomly distributed across 78 metabolic battery cages (0.51 m 0.51 m; 0.07 m2 /bird) and each experimental diets were offered to 6 replicate cages from 15 to 22 d post-hatch. A 48-h total excreta collection period was conducted from d 19 to 21. Excreta was collected on individual steel trays for each pen in 24 h intervals. On d 22, pen weights and feed consumption were recorded, and all broilers were euthanized by an intravenous injection of sodium pentobarbitone to allow for digesta collection. Two digesta samples were collected from the distal half of the jejunum and ileum by squeezing the lumen contents of all 4 birds in the cage. Digesta samples were then frozen until further analysis. A lighting schedule of 18 h light: 6 h dark (18L:6D) was implemented for the duration of the study. Initial temperatures were set at 32 C and gradually reduced to 24 C.
Table 1
Composition of experimental diets fed during the periods in both experiments containing various commercial amino acid supplementation1
Assessment of limiting dietary amino acids in broiler chickens offered reduced crude protein diets - Image 1
Assessment of limiting dietary amino acids in broiler chickens offered reduced crude protein diets - Image 2
Glyequi ¼ glycine equivalence; PDI ¼ pellet durability index.
1 Dietary treatments included 3 control diets with industry control (IC), positive control (PC), and negative control (NC). Subsequent 9 diets were identified by their deleted amino acid 3-letter codes. The ‘Energy’ diet was created by reducing the energy content of the PC by 0.5 MJ/kg. Treatment means represented average of 6 replicate cages.
2 The enzyme blend contained (per kilogram of diet): phytase, 1,000 FTU; xylanase, 4,000 BXU.
3 Celite served as a source of acid insoluble ash to provide an inert internal dietary marker to determine amino acid digestibility coefficients (World Minerals Inc, Lompoc, CA).
4 Washed builder's sand.
5 The premix provided per kilogram of complete feed: retinol, 12,000 IU; cholecalciferol, 5,000 IU; tocopherol, 50 mg; menadione, 3 mg; thiamine, 3 mg; riboflavin, 9 mg; pyridoxine, 5 mg; cobalamin, 0.025 mg; niacin, 50 mg; pantothenate, 18 mg; folate, 2 mg; biotin, 0.2 mg; copper, 20 mg; iron, 40 mg; manganese, 110 mg; cobalt, 0.25 mg; iodine, 1 mg; molybdenum, 2 mg; zinc, 90 mg; selenium, 0.3 mg.
Table 2
Effect of CP reduction and feed-grade amino acid supplementation on the calculated amino acid concentration of the industry control (IC), positive control (PC), and negative control (NC) diets.
Assessment of limiting dietary amino acids in broiler chickens offered reduced crude protein diets - Image 3
1 Digestible basis.
2 Requirement estimates adapted from Wu (2014) (ratio to digestible Lys, 11.5 g/ kg): Lys, 100; Met, 40; Cys, 32; Thr, 67; Val, 77; Ile, 67; Leu, 109; Trp, 17; Arg, 105; His, 35; Phe, 60; Tyr, 45; Gly, 176; Ser, 69; Pro, 184.
3 Sum of Phe and Tyr.
4 Glycine equivalent calculated according to the equation reported by Siegert et al. (2015b).
  
2.4. Experiment 2 -- growth study
A total of 936 off-sex male (parent line) Ross 308 broiler chicks were obtained from a commercial hatchery and fed a common starter (235.0 g/kg CP, 12.13 MJ/kg) from d 0 to 14. On d 15, 12 broilers were group weighed, randomly distributed across 78 floor pens (1.50 m x 1.50 m; 0.19 m2/bird), and started on 1 of 13 experimental diets offered to 6 replicate pens. Floor pens contained new wood bedding, a nipple drinker with 4 nipples, and a hanging tube feeder. On d 35, all broilers were group weighed and feed consumption was recorded to determine body weight (BW) gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) during 15 to 35 d. After recording feed and pen weights, 2 broilers were randomly selected, and blood samples were collected from the brachial vein using heparinized syringes and stored on ice. Immediately following collection, blood samples were centrifuged, plasma decanted, and stored at −80 C until submission for amino acid analysis. Additionally, 5 broilers per pen from 5 replicates were randomly selected and processed to determine total breast meat (Pectoralis major + Pectoralis minor) and thigh yield from the right thigh.
A lighting schedule of 23L:1D was implemented from d 0 to 7 and was adjusted to 18L:6D from d 8 to the conclusion of the trial. Initial temperatures were set at 32 C and gradually reduced to 20 C. Dead birds were recorded and their weights were expressed as percentage of final body weight to correct bird number for feed intake. The corrected feed intake was used to calculate FCR.
2.5. Chemical analyses and calculation
Apparent metabolizable energy (AME), N retention, AMEN, and CP digestibility coefficients and disappearance rates were determined according to the procedures reported by Moss et al. (2018). Plasma samples were analyzed for amino acid content using the protocols reported by Selle et al. (2016). The methods are briefly introduced below.
Excreta were dried in a forced-air oven at 80 C for 24 h and the gross energy (GE) of excreta and diets were determined using an adiabatic bomb calorimeter (Parr 1281 bomb calorimeter, Parr Instruments Co., Moline, IL, USA). The AME values (MJ/kg) of the diets were calculated on a dry matter basis from the following equation:
Assessment of limiting dietary amino acids in broiler chickens offered reduced crude protein diets - Image 1
N contents of diets and excreta were determined using a nitrogen determinator (Leco Corporation, St Joseph, MI) and N retentions calculated from the following equation:
Assessment of limiting dietary amino acids in broiler chickens offered reduced crude protein diets - Image 2
AMEN values (MJ/kg DM) were calculated by correcting N retention to 0 using the factor of 36.54 kJ/g N retained in the body (Hill and Anderson, 1958).
N concentrations were determined as already stated and AIA concentrations were determined by the method of Siriwan et al. (1993). The apparent digestibility coefficients for starch and protein (N) in 4 small intestinal sites were calculated from the following equation:
Assessment of limiting dietary amino acids in broiler chickens offered reduced crude protein diets - Image 3
Protein (N) disappearance rates (g/d per bird) were deduced from the following equation:
Nutrient disappearance rate (g/d per bird)
= Feed intake (g/bird) x Dietary nutrient (g/kg)
x Digestibility coefficient.
Amino acid concentrations in diets were determined via 24 h liquid hydrolysis at 110 C in 6 mol/L HCl followed by analysis of 16 amino acids using the Waters AccQTag Ultra chemistry on a Waters Acquity UPLC (Waters Corporation. Milford, Massachusetts).
Table 3
Live performance of Ross 308 males fed experimental diets from 15 to 22 d in Exp. 1.
Assessment of limiting dietary amino acids in broiler chickens offered reduced crude protein diets - Image 4
BW = body weight; FCR = feed conversion ratio (feed:gain ratio); Glyequi = glycine equivalence.
a-f Within a column, means without a common superscript were determined to be significantly different (P < 0.05) by a student's t-test.
1 Dietary treatments included 3 control diets with industry control (IC), positive control (PC), and negative control (NC). Subsequent 9 diets are identified by their deleted amino acid 3-letter codes. The ‘Energy’ diet was created by reducing the energy content of the PC by 0.5 MJ/kg. Treatment means represent average of 6 replicate cages.
Concentrations of 20 proteinogenic amino acids in plasma taken from the brachial and anterior mesenteric veins were determined using precolumn derivatisation amino acid analysis with 6- aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate (AQC; Waters AccQTag Ultra; www.waters.com) followed by separation of the derivatives and quantification by reversed phase ultra-performance liquid chromatography (Cohen 2001). All amino acids were detected by UV absorbance.
2.6. Statistical analyses
Pen or cage was considered the experimental unit, and treatments were assigned to pens or cages in a randomized complete block design with pen or cage location serving as the blocking factor. The statistical model is described by the below equation:
Assessment of limiting dietary amino acids in broiler chickens offered reduced crude protein diets - Image 5
where Yhi is the random variable representing the response for treatment i observed in block h, m is the overall mean, qh is the effect of the hth block, ti is the additive effect of the ith treatment, εhi is the random error for the ith treatment in the hth block.
Each treatment was represented by 6 replicate cages (Exp. 1) or pens (Exp. 2) for live performance, nutrient utilization, and plasma amino acids, whereas treatments were represented by 5 replicate pens for carcass traits (Exp. 2). The data from both experiments were analysed by ANOVA using JMP Pro 15. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05. When appropriate, differences among treatments were separated using a repeated t-test.
3. Results
3.1. Live performance
There was no significant differences on performance in birds offered the IC and PC diets (P > 0.05) for both the 15 to 22 d and 15 to 35 d periods in Exp. 1 and 2, respectively (Tables 3 and 6). In comparison to PC, the removal of all supplemented amino acids, Val, and Arg significantly reduced (P < 0.05) BW gain in Exp. 1 and 2, whereas the removal of supplemented Ile reduced (P < 0.05) BW gain only in Exp. 2. Feed intake was significantly higher (P < 0.05) for birds fed diets devoid of Leu, Glyequi, Trp, and Energy than those offered the PC diet, whereas the removal of supplemented Val from the diet resulted in reduced (P < 0.05) feed intake in Exp. 1. In Exp. 2, all birds had similar (P > 0.05) feed intake to those fed the PC diet except birds offered diets devoidin Val had reduced (P< 0.05) feed intake. In Exp.1, broiler chickens offered the NC diet had increased FCR than birds offered the PC diet. The removal of supplemented Val, Arg, Ile, His, and Trp significantly impaired (P < 0.05) feed conversion compared to birds fed the PC diet. In Exp. 2, the removal of supplemented Val, Arg, Ile, and Trp significantly increased (P < 0.05) FCR in comparison to the PC diet. Broilers fed the NC diet and diet devoid of Arg had the worst (P < 0.05) feed conversion efficiency.
Table 4
Nutrient utilization and excreta dry matter of Ross 308 males fed diets varying in amino acid and energy supplementation 15 to 22 d in Exp. 1.
Assessment of limiting dietary amino acids in broiler chickens offered reduced crude protein diets - Image 6
AME = apparent metabolizable energy; ME:GE ratio= metabolizable energy to gross energy ratio; N retention = nitrogen retention; AMEN = nitrogen corrected apparent metabolizable energy; Glyequi = glycine equivalence.
a-e Within a column, means without a common superscript were determined to be significantly different (P < 0.05) by a student's t-test.
1 Dietary treatments included 3 control diets with positive control (PC) and negative control (NC). Subsequent 9 diets are identified by their deleted amino acid 3-letter codes. Treatment means represent average of six replicate cages. The ‘Energy’ diet was created by reducing the energy content of the PC by 0.5 MJ/kg.
Table 5
Apparent digestibility coefficients and disappearance rates of protein in the distal jejunum and distal ileum of Ross 308 males fed diets varying in amino acid and energy supplementation 15 to 22 d in Exp. 1.
Assessment of limiting dietary amino acids in broiler chickens offered reduced crude protein diets - Image 1
Glyequi = glycine equivalence.
a-e Within a column, means without a common superscript were determined to be significantly different (P < 0.05) by a student's t-test.
1 Disappearance rates reflect cumulative disappearance rate for the identified intestinal section.
2 Dietary treatments included 3 control diets with positive control (PC) and negative control (NC). Subsequent 9 diets are identified by their deleted amino acid 3-letter codes. The ‘Energy’ diet was created by reducing the energy content of the PC by 0.5 MJ/kg. Treatment means represent average of 6 replicate cages.
3.2. Carcass traits
Broiler chickens offered the NC diet and Arg-deleted diet had the highest relative abdominal fat pad weight; whereas birds offered the low energy diet had the lowest relative fat pad weight (P < 0.05) (Table 7). Broilers offered the PC diet had the highest total breast yield; whereas, broilers offered the NC diet had the lowest total breast meat yield (P < 0.05). The removal of supplemented Arg and Ile from the diet reduced breast yield similar (P > 0.05) to the NC diet, whereas, the removal of supplemented Val and Glyequi resulted in total breast yield intermediate of birds fed the NC and PC diets. Birds offered all other diets did not show significant changes on total breast yield in comparison to birds fed the PC diet. Broilers fed diets devoid in Glyequi had the lowest (P < 0.05) thigh yield; whereas all other broilers had thigh yields similar (P > 0.05) to birds fed the PC diet.
Table 6
Live performance of Ross 308 males fed experimental diets from 15 to 35 d in Exp. 2.
Assessment of limiting dietary amino acids in broiler chickens offered reduced crude protein diets - Image 2
BW = body weight; FCR = feed conversion ratio (feed:gain ratio); Glyequi = glycine equivalence.
a-e Within a column, means without a common superscript were determined to be significantly different (P < 0.05) by a student's t-test.
1 Dietary treatments included 3 control diets with industry control (IC), positive control (PC), and negative control (NC). Subsequent 9 diets are identified by their deleted amino acid 3-letter codes. Treatment means represent average of 6 replicate pens. The ‘Energy’ diet was created by reducing the energy content of the PC by 0.5 MJ/kg. Treatment means represent average of 6 replicate cages.
  
3.3. Nutrient utilization
The effects of amino acid deletion on nutrient utilization are shown in Table 4. Only the removal of supplemented Val significantly changed AME, ME:GE ratio, and AMEN from those observed in broilers fed the PC diet. Broilers offered diets devoid in Energy, Arg, Ile, Trp, and Val as well as broilers fed the NC diet had significantly lower (P < 0.05) N retention than those fed the PC diet. Excreta dry matter was increased for broiler chickens offered diets devoid in Val and Phe + Tyr compared to those offered the PC diet.
Table 7
Carcass traits of Ross 308 males fed diets varying in amino acid and energy supplementation from 15 to 35 d in Exp. 2.
Assessment of limiting dietary amino acids in broiler chickens offered reduced crude protein diets - Image 3
Glyequi = glycine equivalence.
a-f Within a column, means without a common superscript were determined to be significantly different (P < 0.05) by a student's t-test. 1 Yields expressed relative to live body weight. Total breast yield representative of Pectoralis major + P. minor. Thigh representative of bone-in, skin-on right thigh.
2 Dietary treatments included 3 control diets with industry control (IC), positive control (PC), and negative control (NC). Subsequent 9 diets are identified by their deleted amino acid 3-letter codes. The ‘Energy’ diet was created by reducing the energy content of the PC by 0.5 MJ/kg. Treatment means represent average of 5 replicate cages.
Table 8
Plasma essential amino acid concentrations (mg/mL) of Ross 308 males fed diets varying in amino acid and energy supplementation from 15 to 35 d in Exp. 2.
Assessment of limiting dietary amino acids in broiler chickens offered reduced crude protein diets - Image 4
Glyequi = glycine equivalence.
a-g Within a column, means without a common superscript were determined to be significantly different (P < 0.05) by a student's t-test.
1 Dietary treatments included 3 control diets with industry control (IC), positive control (PC), and negative control (NC). Subsequent 9 diets are identified by their deleted amino acid 3-letter codes. The ‘Energy’ diet was created by reducing the energy content of the PC by 0.5 MJ/kg. Treatment means represent average of 2 replicate cages.
  
Table 5 reports the effects of amino acid deletion on apparent protein digestibility and protein disappearance rates in the distal jejunum and distal ileum. Apparent protein digestibility in the distal ileum was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in broilers offered diets devoid in Energy, Arg, Ile, Pro, Trp, Leu, and Val compared to the PC diet. Broiler chickens offered Val-deleted diet had significantly lower ileal protein disappearance rate than the PC diet (P < 0.05); whereas broiler chickens offered His-deleted and low energy diets had significantly higher ileal protein disappearance rate than the PC diet (P < 0.05).
3.4. Plasma amino acid levels
Deletion of supplemented amino acids from the PC diet significantly influenced (P < 0.05) the plasma amino acid levels with the exception of Trp (P = 0.266) and Asp (P = 0.886) (Tables 8 and 9). Broilers offered Arg-deleted diet had the highest (P < 0.05) plasma concentration of all analyzed amino acids except Trp, Arg, Ala, Asp, and Glu. Broilers offered Leu-deleted diet had increased (P < 0.05) concentrations of plasma Val and Ile compared to birds fed the 3 control diets.
4. Discussion
It is expected that broiler chickens offered the IC and PC diets had statistically similar growth performance including weight gain and FCR. The IC served as a benchmark representing diets currently utilized in the Australian poultry industry. Table 2 displays the calculated levels of all tested amino acids, plus Lys, Met, Cys, and Thr, a published source of requirements is also included in order to show how amino acid levels fluctuated. The cited requirements in Table 2 (Wu, 2014) were chosen as it provides requirements for 20 amino acids from a single literature source. Dietary CP were then reduced by 23.3 g/kg to gain the PC diet where the ideal protein ratios were maintained for all the relevant amino acids (Table 2). Obviously, broiler chickens offered the NC diet had significantly worse growth performance than birds offered the PC and IC diets, because the NC diet had reduced amino acid concentrations except Lys, TSAA and Thr. As variation in analyzed amino acid content was observed in the experimental diets, overall trends were in agreement with formulated levels and reductions. Apart from live performance, similar carcass traits and plasma amino acids were observed in broilers offered the IC and PC diets. In agreement with previous studies, this indicated that the supplementation of non-bound amino acids and reduction in CP from the PC diet did not influence broiler growth and protein accretion (Si et al., 2004; Chrystal et al., 2019). Furthermore, the removal of all supplemental amino acids and an energy reduction in the NC diet negatively influenced all live performance parameters and carcass traits, with the exceptions of feed intake and thigh yield. The reduction in dietary energy (0.5 MJ) did not appear to contribute the negative responses observed in broilers offered the NC diet as the energy reduction alone did not impair growth performance compared to broilers offered the PC diet.
Table 9
Plasma conditionally essential, sparing, and non-essential amino acid concentrations (mg/mL) of Ross 308 males fed diets varying in amino acid and energy supplementation from 15 to 35 d in Exp. 2.
Assessment of limiting dietary amino acids in broiler chickens offered reduced crude protein diets - Image 5
Glyequi = glycine equivalence.
a-g Within a column, means without a common superscript were determined to be significantly different (P < 0.05) by a student's t-test.
1 Dietary treatments included 3 control diets with industry control (IC), positive control (PC), and negative control (NC). Subsequent 9 diets are identified by their deleted amino acid 3-letter codes. The ‘Energy’ diet was created by reducing the energy content of the PC by 0.5 MJ/kg. Treatment means represent average of 2 replicate cages.
   
Removal of supplemented Val had the most severe impact on live performance in both experiments. In Exp. 2, depressions in BW gain were greater in birds offered Val-deleted diet than broilers offered the NC diet. This is consistent with Sugahara et al. (1969) where deletion of a single amino acid resulted in a larger impact on performance than a simultaneous reduction in all amino acids to below requirement levels. While differences in feed conversion ratios were observed in both experiments, relative fat pad weight did not differ when compared with birds offered the PC diet. This is inconsistent with the classic relationship between FCR and relative fat pad weights, where increase of FCR often coupled with increase of abdominal fat pad weights in reduced CP diets (Chrystal et al., 2020b).
Ideal protein ratios of 20 amino acids were suggested by Wu (2014) where both ratios in the literature and whole-body protein composition were considered. The removal of supplemented Arg resulted in the largest deficiency (73%) in the diet when compared to requirement estimated by Wu (2014). Nevertheless, broilers fed diets devoid in supplemental Arg had the second lowest BW gain and impaired feed conversion in both experiments. Broiler chickens offered the Arg-deleted diet had decreased total breast meat yield coupled with increased fat pad weight compared to birds offered the PC diet. Consistently, similar responses to Arg deficiency were reported by Corzo et al. (2021) who reported the requirements of Arg to Lys ratios is 129, 116 and 109 for BW gain, feed conversion and breast yield, respectively. The deletion of Arg resulted in the largest increase in plasma Thr levels in the present study which was previously reported to occur in the face of severe amino acid deficiencies (Zimmerman and Scott, 1965) and 5 studies involved reduced CP diets (Macelline et al., 2021). Furthermore, in agreement with the findings in Zimmerman and Scott (1965), all amino acids, with the exception of Trp, accumulated in the plasma when Arg was deficient.
In Exp. 1, the removal of supplemented Ile resulted in impaired feed conversion with no impact on BW gain and feed intake. In Exp. 2, the removal of feed grade Ile reduced BW gain and feed conversion compared to broilers fed the PC diet. This inconsistency could be caused by the age differences of birds involved in both experiments. Furthermore, relative differences (compared to PC) were consistent at the conclusion of both experiments indicate that increased breast meat accretion as the bird ages (18% at 22 d vs. 24% at 35 d; Ross, 2019) despite the link between deficient Ile and decreased breast meat yield (Hale et al., 2004; Kidd et al., 2004; Tavernari et al., 2012).
Deletion of dietary His negatively influenced feed conversion during Exp. 1, but broilers in Exp. 2 showed no signs of adverse effect. Histidine is the only amino acid that can be stored in the body in the form of carnosine (Robbins et al., 1977; Hansen and Smith, 1949) and Robbins et al. (1977) suggested that the true requirement for His should be considered when muscle carnosine plateaus. In the present study, the decrease in dietary His may triggered reduction in carnosine production which may have negatively influenced feed conversion until such time that birds adjusted to the lower His diet.
The removal of Trp resulted in decreased BW gain, increased feed intake and feed conversion ratio in Exp. 1, but in Exp. 2 no adverse effects were observed for broilers fed Trp-deleted diet. Existing literature on the Trp requirement indicates that a Trp to Lys ratio of 19 is necessary to obtain optimal performance, especially for the first 3 weeks (Cozo et al., 2005; Corzo, 2012); whereas a requirement could not be determined for optimal performance during a 22 to 42 d growing period (Duarte et al., 2013). This suggested a decreasing requirement of His with age and the removal of feed grade Trp in the present study only led to 3% deficiency. Interestingly, very little variation in plasma Trp levels among different dietary treatments were observed. Therefore, any deficiency that could have occurred early on in the 15 to 22 d period, may have been overcome as the growout period continued to 35 d post-hatch.
Influence of the removal of supplemented Leu was limited to a marginal increase in feed intake (37 g) and a numeric increase in BW gain (36 g) compared to birds fed the PC in Exp. 1. Although decreases in protein digestibility were observed in both distal jejunum and distal ileum, the marginal increase in feed intake allowed for comparable protein disappearance rates. Furthermore, these trends were also observed in Exp. 2 with no influence on performance or carcass traits. Interestingly, despite the lack of negative effects on performance parameters, free Val and Ile accumulated in the plasma when Leu was deficient. The branchedchain amino acids share a common degradation pathway for the first two steps of their catabolism, in which they undergo a reversible transamination followed by an irreversible decarboxylation (Harper et al., 1984). These shared steps have been identified as a potential mode of action for the antagonism observed among the branched-chain amino acids where a dietary excess of any of the 3 branched-chain amino acid can lead to the inadvertent catabolism of the other 2 branched-chain amino acids (Maynard et al., 2021a). The buildup of plasma Val and Ile in a diet deficient in Leu may indicate that dietary Leu may play a larger role in branched-chain amino acid catabolism than Val and Ile. Previous data on amino acid catabolism indicated that dietary protein level largely controls the amino acid catabolism enzyme activity as opposed to the levels of individual amino acids per se (Keene and Austic, 2001). In typical poultry diet, Leu is the most abundant branched-chain amino acid and given the possibility that Leu plays bigger role in branched-chain amino acid catabolism, Leu excess may be the most potent cause of branched-chain amino acid antagonism (Mathieu and Scott, 1968; D'Mello and Lewis, 1970; Harper et al., 1984).
The removal of Phe + Tyr had no negative impact on performance or carcass traits except a minor increase in feed conversion ratio (e.g., 4 points increase compared with PC). While the majority of Phe and Tyr requirement studies are dated and focus on young chicks (Sasse and Baker, 1972; Baker and Han, 1994; Sterling, 2000; Lartey and Austic, 2008; Franco et al., 2017), Lartey and Austic (2008) found that the Phe requirement was lower for BW gain than feed conversion ratio. In the present study, the removal of Phe + Tyr did not lead to deficiency in these amino acids due to the higher level of Phe + Tyr derived from intact protein ingredients; hence, significant impact on growth performance was not observed.
Both Pro and Gly are conditionally limited especially during times of rapid growth when the chick cannot produce enough de novo to supply their respective requirements. The requirement of Gly coupled with Ser, which often met by Gly supplementation, is either expressed as Gly + Ser inclusions (Dean et al., 2006) or Gly equivalent (Siegert et al., 2015a). The inclusion of excess Ser in the diet has been shown to completely eliminate the need for Gly in the diet (Baker et al., 1968), and due to the efficient molar conversion of Ser to Gly, the dietary levels of Gly + Ser can be expressed as Glyequi to more accurately represent the amount of molar Gly in the diet (Siegert et al., 2015b). Glycine requirement studies typically utilized young birds and determined the requirement when the most rapid growth occurs; therefore, the production of Gly from other nutrients, such as Thr and choline may not be efficient to satisfy Gly requirements (Coon et al., 1974; Maruyama et al., 1978; Waldroup et al., 2005a; Siegert et al., 2015a). In the present study, Glyequi showed no signs of limiting growth other than a minor increase in feed intake in Exp. 1; whereas, in Exp. 2, its deletion resulted in reduced breast and thigh yield compared to birds fed the PC diet.
The reduction of dietary energy by 0.5 MJ/kg had no negative effect on growth performance and carcass yield but reduced relative fat pad weights. Similarly, recent studies reported energy reduction ranged from 0.29 to 0.42 MJ/kg had minimal impact on feed intake and no effect on carcass traits (Gopinger et al., 2017; Maynard et al., 2019). Although distal ileal protein digestibility coefficients were reduced in birds offered diets with reduced energy content, protein disappearance rates in the distal ileum were increased relative to the PC diet. Despite the reduced protein digestibility, the reduction in dietary energy led to a 12.6 g/kg decrease in soybean oil inclusion. Soybean oil represents an energy dense feed ingredient that is commonly used to satisfy energy values in formulation but is also a high-cost ingredient (Barbour et al., 2006). The result indicates that feed cost may be reduced by decreasing added oil inclusion without compromising live performance in low-CP diet.
5. Conclusions
Overall, Val and Arg are likely co-limiting in wheat-soybean meal diets followed by Glyequi and Ile. Limitations in branched chain amino acids, especially Val and Ile compromised weight gain, FCR and breast meat yield to the largest extent when compared with limitation of other amino acids in reduced CP diets based on wheat. Gly and Ser limitation significantly compromised FCR whereas limitation in His significantly reduced breast meat and thigh meat yield in reduced CP diets without influencing FCR and weight gain. It is encouraging that reducing energy level by 0.5 MJ/ kg in the 180 g/kg CP diet reduced fat pad weights without compromising growth performance. Further investigations are required to confirm this finding as reduction in dietary energy has strong implication on reducing feed cost.
    
This article was originally published in Animal Nutrition 10 (2022), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.11.010. This is an Open Access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Almquist HJ. Evaluation of amino acid requirements by observations on the chick.
J Nutr 1947;34:543e63.
Baker DH. Amino acid nutrition for pigs and poultry. In: Recent advances in animal nutrition. London, UK: Butterworths; 1989. p. 245e58.
Baker DH. Ideal amino acid profiles for swine and poultry and their application in feed formulation. BioKyowa Tech. Rev. 1997;9:1e24.
Baker DH, Han Y. Ideal amino acid profile for chicks during the first three weeks posthatching. Poultry Sci 1994;73:1441e7.
Baker DH, Sugahara M, Scott HM. The glycine-serine interrelationship in chick nutrition. Poultry Sci 1968;47:1376e7.
Barbour GW, Farran MT, Usayran NN, Darwish AH, Uwayjan MG, Ashkarian VM.
Effect of soybean oil supplementation to low metabolizable energy diets on production parameters of broiler chickens. J Appl Poultry Res 2006;15:190e7.
Chrystal PV, Moss AF, Khoddami A, Naranjo VD, Selle PH, Liu SY. Effects of reduced crude protein levels, dietary electrolyte balance, and energy density on the performance of broiler chickens offered maize-based diets with evaluations of starch, protein, and amino acid metabolism. Poultry Sci 2020a;99:1421e31.
Chrystal PV, Moss AF, Khoddami A, Naranjo VD, Selle PH, Liu SY. Impacts of reducedcrude protein diets on key parameters in male broiler chickens offered maize based diets. Poultry Sci 2019;99:505e16.
Chrystal PV, Selle PH, Liu SY. Facilitating the acceptance of tangibly reduced-crude protein diets for chicken-meat production. Anim Nutr 2020b;6:247e57.
Coon CN, Grossie VB, Couch JR. Glycine-serine requirement for chicks. Poultry Sci
1974;53:1709e13.
Cohen SA. Amino acid analysis using precolumn derivatisation with 6- aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate. Methods Mol Biol 2001;159:
39e47.
Corzo A. Determination of the arginine, tryptophan, and glycine ideal-protein ratios in high-yield broiler chicks. J Appl Poultry Res 2012;21:79e87.
Cozo A, Kidd MT, Thaxton JP, Kerr BJ. Dietary tryptophan effects on growth and stress responses of male broiler chicks. Br Poultry Sci 2005;46:478e84.
Corzo A, Lee J, Vargas JI, Silva M, Pacheco WJ. Determination of the optimal digestible arginine to lysine ratio in Ross 708 male broilers. J Appl Poultry Res
2021;30:100136.
Dean DW, Bidner TD, Southern LL. Glycine supplementation to low protein, amino acid-supplemented diets supports optimal performance of broiler chicks.
Poultry Sci 2006;85:288e96.
D'Mello JPF, Lewis D. Amino acid interactions in chick nutrition. 2. Interrelationships between leucine, isoleucine and valine. Br Poultry Sci 1970;11:313e23.
Duarte KF, Junqueira OM, Filardi RS, Siqueira JC, Puzotti MM, Garcia EA, Molino AB,
Laurentiz AC. Digestible tryptophan requirements for broilers from 22 to 42 days old. Rev Bras Zootec 2013;42:728e33.
Edmonds MS, Parsons CM, Baker DH. Limiting amino acids in low-protein cornsoybean meal diets fed to growing chicks. Poultry Sci 1985;64:1519e26.
Fernandez SR, Aoyagi S, Han Y, Parsons CM, Baker DH. Limiting order of amino acids in corn and soybean meal for growth of the chick. Poultry Sci 1994;73:1887e96.
Fisher H, Shapiro S. Amino acid imbalance: rations low in tryptophan, methionine or lysine and the efficiency of utilization of nitrogen in imbalanced rations.
J Nutr 1961;75:395e401.
Franco SM, Tavernari FC, Maia RC, Barros VRSM, Albino LFT, Rostagno HS, Lelis GR,
Calderano AA, Dilger RN. Estimation of optimal ratios of digestible phenylalanine þ tyrosine, histidine, and leucine to digestible lysine for performance and breast yield in broilers. Poultry Sci 2017;96:829e37.
Gopinger E, Krabbe EL, Surek D, Lopes LS, Avila VS. Live performance, carcass, and bone quality responses of grower and finisher broilers to dietary metabolizable energy levels. Bras. J. Poult. Sci. 2017;19:559e66.
Gous RM, Faulkner AS, Swatson HK. The effect of dietary energy:protein ratio, protein quality and food allocation on the efficiency of utilisation of protein by broiler chickens. Br Poultry Sci 2018;59:100e9.
Greenhalgh S, McInerney BV, McQuade LR, Chrystal PV, Khoddami A, Zhuang MAM,
Liu SY, Selle PH. Capping dietary starch:protein ratios in moderately reduced crude protein, wheat-based diets showed promise but further reductions generated inferior growth performance in broiler chickens from 7 to 35 days post-hatch Anim. Nutridate 2020;6:168e78.
Hale LL, Barber SJ, Corzo A, Kidd MT. Isoleucine needs of thirty- to forty-two-day-old female chickens: growth and carcass responses. Poultry Sci 2004;83:1986e91.
Hansen HT, Smith EL. Carnosinase: an enzyme of swine kidney. J Biol Chem
1949;179:789e801.
Harper AE, Miller RH, Block KP. Branched-chain amino acid metabolism. Annu Rev
Nutr 1984;4:409e54.
Hill FW, Anderson DL. Comparison of metabolizable energy and productive energy determinations with growing chicks. J Nutr 1958;64:587e603.
Holsheimer JP, Janssen WMMA. Limiting amino acids in low protein maizesoyabean meal diets fed to broiler chicks from 3 to 7 weeks of age. Br Poultry
Sci 1991;32:151e8.
Johnson CA, Duong T, Latham RE, Shirley RB, Lee JT. Effects of amino acid and energy density on growth performance and processing yield of mixed-sex Cobb 700
MV broiler chickens. J Appl Poultry Res 2020;29:269e83.
Keene JC, Austic RE. Dietary supplements of mixtures of indispensable amino acids lacking threonine, phenylalanine or histidine increase the activity of hepatic threonine dehydrogenase, phenylalanine hydroxylase or histidase, respectively, and prevent growth depressions in chicks caused by dietary excesses of threonine, phenylalanine, or histidine. J Nutr Biochem 2001;12:274e84.
Kidd MT, Burnham DJ, Kerr BJ. Dietary isoleucine responses in male broiler chickens.
Br Poultry Sci 2004;45:67e75.
Kidd MT, Hackenhaar L. Dietary threonine for broilers: dietary interactions and feed additive supplement use. CAB Reviews: perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary
Science. Nutr Natural Res 2006;1:1e6.
Kidd MT, Zumwalt CD, Chamblee DW, Carden ML, Burnham DJ. Broiler growth and carcass responses to diets containing l-threonine versus diets containing threonine from intact protein sources. J Appl Poultry Res 2002;11:83e9.
Lartey MF, Austic ER. Phenylalanine requirement, imbalance, and dietary excess in one-week-old chicks: Growth and phenylalanine hydroxylase activity. Poultry
Science 2008;87(2):291e7. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00268.
Macelline SP, Chrystal PV, Liu SY, Selle PH. Implications of elevated threonine plasma concentrations in the development of reduced-crude protein diets for broiler chickens. Anim Prod Sci 2021;61:1442e8.
Mathieu D, Scott HM. Growth depressing effect of excess leucine in relation to the amino acid composition of the diet. Poultry Sci 1968;47:1694.
Maruyama K, Sunde ML, Swick RW. Growth and muscle protein turnover in the chick. Biochem J 1978;176:573e82.
Maynard CW, Latham RE, Brister R, Owens CM, Rochell SJ. Effects of dietary energy and amino acid density during finisher and withdrawal phases on live performance and carcass characteristics of cobb mv 700 broilers. J Appl Poultry Res
2019;28:729e42.
Maynard CW, Liu SY, Lee JT, Caldas J, Diehl JJE, Rochell SJ, Kidd MT. Determining the
4th limiting amino acid in low crude protein diets for male and female Cobb
MV 500 broilers. Br Poultry Sci 2020;61:695e702.
Maynard CW, Dridi S, Liu SY, Kidd MT. Branched-chain amino acids in poultry nutrition: potential antagonisms in practical feed formulation. In: Kidd MT, editor. Branched-chain amino acids: synthesis, benefits and role in disease.
Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.; 2021a. p. 197e247.
Moss AF, Sydenham CJ, Khoddami A, Naranjo VD, Liu SY, Selle PH. Dietary starch influences growth performance, nutrient utilisation, and digestive dynamics of protein and amino acids in broiler chickens offered low-protein diets. Anim
Feed Sci Technol 2018;237:55e67.
Munro HN, Naismith DJ. The influence of energy intake on protein metabolism.
Biochem J 1953;54:191e7.
Peter CM, Han Y, Boling-Frankenbach SD, Parsons CM, Baker DH. Limiting order of amino acids and the effects of phytase on protein quality in corn gluten meal fed to young chicks. J Anim Sci 2000;78:2150e6.
Robbins KR, Baker DH, Norton HW. Histidine status in the chick as measured by growth rate, plasma free histidine and breast muscle carnosine. J Nutr
1977;107:2055e61.
Rose WC, Coon MJ, Lambert GF. The amino acid requirements of man. VI. The role of caloric intake. J Biol Chem 1954;210:331e42.
Ross Ross. 308 Ross 308 FF performance objectives. Al: Aviagen, Huntsville; 2019.
Sasse CE, Baker DH. The phenylalanine and tyrosine requirements and their interrelationship for the young chick. Poultry Sci 1972;51:1531e6.
Schwartz RW, Bray DJ. Limiting amino acids in 40:60 and 15:85 blends of corn: soybean protein for the chick. Poultry Sci 1975;54(Suppl. 1):1814 [(Abstract)].
Selle PH, Truong HH, McQuade LR, Moss AF, Liu SY. Reducing agent and exogenous protease additions, individually and in combination, to wheat- and sorghumbased diets interactively influence parameters of nutrient utilisation and digestive dynamics in broiler chickens. Anim. Nutr. 2016;2:303e11.
Si J, Fritts CA, Burnham DJ, Waldroup PW. Extent to which crude protein may be reduced in corn-soybean meal broiler diets through amino acid supplementation. Int J Poultry Sci 2004;3:46e50.
Siegert W, Ahmadi H, Helmbrecht A, Rodehutscord M. A quantitative study of the interactive effects of glycine and serine with threonine and choline on growth performance in broilers. Poultry Sci 2015a;94:1557e68.
Siegert W, Ahmadi H, Rodehutscord M. Meta-analysis of the influence of dietary glycine and serine, with consideration of methionine and cysteine, on growth and feed conversion of broilers. Poultry Sci 2015b;94:1853e63.
Siriwan P, Bryden WL, Mollah Y, Annison EF. Measurement of endogenous aminoacid losses in poultry. Br Poultry Sci 1993;34:939e49.
Sterling KG. The use of an indicator amino acid to determine the phenylalanine requirement of male broiler chicks. University of Mayland Eastern Shore; 2000
[Master’s Thesis].
Sugahara M, Baker DH, Scott HM. Effect of different patterns of excess amino acids on performance of chicks fed amino acid-deficient diets. J Nutr 1969;97:29e32.
Tavernari FC, Lelis GR, Carneiro PRO, Vieira RA, Polveiro RC, Luengas JAR,
Rostagno HS, Albino LFT. Effect of different digestible isoleucine/lysine ratios for broiler chickens. Rev Bras Zootec 2012;41:1699e705.
Waldroup PW, Jiang Q, Fritts CA. Effects of glycine and threonine supplementation on performance of broiler chicks fed diets low in crude protein. Int J Poultry Sci
2005a;4:250e7.
Waldroup PW, Jiang Q, Fritts CA. Effects of supplementing broiler diets low in crude protein with essential and nonessential amino acids. Int J Poultry Sci 2005b;4:
425e31.
Wang X. Effect of processing methods and raw material sources on protein quality of animal protein meals. University of Illinois; 1997 [Doctorate Dissertation].
Wang X, Castanon F, Parsons CM. Order of amino acid limitation in meat and bone meal. Poultry Sci 1997;76:54e8.
Wang X, Parsons CM. Order of amino acid limitation in poultry by-product meal. Br
Poultry Sci 1998;39:113e6.
Wu G. Dietary requirements of synthesizable amino acids by animals: a paradigm shift in protein nutrition. J Anim Sci 2014;5:34e45.
Zimmerman RA, Scott HM. Interrelationship of plasma amino acid levels and weight gain in the chick as influenced by suboptimal and superoptimal dietary concentrations of single amino acids. J Nutr 1965;87:13e8.

Related topics:
Authors:
Clay Maynard
University of Arkansas (USA)
University of Arkansas (USA)
Michael T. Kidd
University of Arkansas (USA)
University of Arkansas (USA)
Peter Chrystal
Baiada Poultry
Baiada Poultry
Dr. Peter Selle
The University of Sydney
The University of Sydney
Dr Sonia Yun Liu
The University of Sydney
The University of Sydney
Show more
Recommend
Comment
Share
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Poultry Industry
Vivek Kuttappan
Vivek Kuttappan
Cargill
Research Scientist
United States
Kendra Waldbusser
Kendra Waldbusser
Pilgrim´s
United States
Karen Christensen
Karen Christensen
Tyson
Tyson
PhD, senior director of animal welfare at Tyson Foods
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.