In arid conditions, the low quality of the forage and water shortage could be attenuated by the introduction of Opuntia species. Several plant species grows well under Prosopis canopy, responding to a higher nutrient content in the soil, It was hypothesized that productivity and nutrient content, mainly crude protein (CP), of Opuntia ellisiana planted under Prosopis would be higher than of those planted outside the canopy, and that these parameters would be influenced by the cactus position: north or south from the centre of the tree. Sampling was done in 18 plants under the canopy of Prosopis and 23 outside of it. After one year of the plantation, the totality of cladodes was harvested. The productivity per plantwas 3.1 and 5.7 cladodes and 34.9 and 48.1 g of dry matter (DM), outside and under the canopy, respectively. The bromatological values (%) were moisture: 89.1 and 91.9, organic matter (OM): 76.7 and 79.8, CP: 4.4 and 8.1, acid detergent fiber (ADF): 13.7 and 18.2, neutral detergent fiber (NDF): 29.0 and 31.5, K: 3.1 and 3.6, P: 0.07 and 0.11, Ca: 5.5 and 4.4, Na: 0.04 and 0.02, outside and under the canopy, respectively. Crude protein, moisture, OM, ADF, NDF, K, P and productivity per plant were higher under the canopy, whereas Ca and Na values were higher outside the canopy (p<0.05). Magnesium (1.9 and 1.9%) was not affected by the position outside or under the canopy. The north or south orientation did not influence any of the analysed parameters.
Keywords bromatological composition • crude protein • food reserve • agrosystem enrichment • arid lands
1. Acevedo, E.; Badilla, I.; Nobel, P. S. 1983. Water relations, diurnal acidity changes, and productivity of a cultivated cactus, Opuntia ficus-indica. Plant Physiology. 72: 775-780.
2. Alvarez, J. A.; Villagra, P. E.; Rossi, B. E.; Cesca, E. M. 2009. Spatial and temporal litterfall heterogeneity generated by woody species in the Central Monte desert. Plant Ecology. 205: 295-303.
3. Barth, R. C.; Klemmedson, J. O. 1982. Amount and distribution of dry matter, Nitrogen, and organic Carbon in soil-plant systems of mesquite and palo verde. Journal of Range Management. 35: 412-418.
4. Ben Salem, H. 2010. Nutritional management to improve sheep and goat performances in semiarid regions. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 39: 337-347. Suppl.spe Viçosa.
5. Borrego-Escalante, F.; Murillo-Soto, M. M.; Parga-Torres, V. M. 1990. Potencial de producción en el norte de México de variedades de nopal (Opuntia spp.) tolerantes al frío. In: Felker, P. (Ed.). Proceedings of the First Annual Texas Prickly Pear Council. Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute. Kingsville. Texas. p. 49-73.
6. Callaway, R. M. 1995. Positive interactions among plants. The Botanical Review. 61: 306-349.
7. Callaway, R. M. 2007. Direct mechanisms for facilitation. In: Positive interactions and interdependence in plant communities. Springer Dordrecht. The Netherlands. 15-116.
8. Da Silva, J. A.; Bonomo, P.; Donato, S. L. R.; Pires, A. J. V.; Rosa, R. C. C.; Donato, P. E. R. 2012. Composição mineral em cladódios de palma forrageira sob diferentes espaçamentos e adubações química. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias. 7: 866-875.
9. da Silva, T. G. F.; Primo, J. T. A.; de Morais, J. E. F.; da Silva Diniz, W. J.; de Souza, C. A. A.; da Conceição Silva, M. 2015. Crescimento e produtividade de clones de palma forrageira no semiárido e relações com variáveis meteorológicas. Revista Caatinga. 28: 10-18.
10. Donato, P. E. R.; Vieira Pires, A. J.; Rodrigues Donato, S. L.; Da Silva, J. A.; De Aquino, A. A. (2014). Valor nutritivo da palma forrageira 'gigante' cultivada sob diferentes espaçamentos e doses de esterco bovino. Revista Caatinga. 27: 163-172.
11. Doussouline E.; Acevedo, E.; García de Cortázar, V. 1989. Arquitectura, intercepción de radiación y producción en tuna Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. Idesia. 11: 7-17.
12. Felker, P. 1995. Forage and fodder production and utilization. In: Barbera, G.; Inglese, P.; Pimienta-Barrios, E. (Eds.). Agro-ecology, cultivation and uses of cactus pear. FAO. Rome. Italy. 144-154.
13. Fernández, M. E.; Passera, C. B.; Cony, M. A. 2016. Sapling growth, water status and survival of two native shrubs from the Monte Desert, Mendoza, Argentina, under different preconditioning treatments. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. 48(1): 33-47.
14. García de Cortázar, V.; Nobel, P. S. 1986. Modeling of PAR interception and productivity of a prickly pear cactus Opuntia ficus-indica L., at various spacings. Agronomy Journal. 78: 80-85.
15. Geesing, D.; Felker, P.; Bingham, R. L. 2000. Influence of mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) on soil nitrogen and carbon development: Implications for global carbon sequestration. Journal of Arid Environments. 46: 157-180.
16. Grünwaldt, J. M.; Guevara, J. C.; Grünwaldt, E. G.; Martínez Carretero, E. 2015. Cacti (Opuntia sps.) as forage in Argentina dry lands. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. 47(1): 263-282.
17. Guevara, J. C.; Felker, P.; Balzarini, M. G.; Paez, S. A.; Estevez, O. R.; Paez, M. N; Antúnez, J. C. 2011. Productivity, cold hardiness and forage quality of spineless progeny of the Opuntia ficus-indica 1281 x O. lindheimerii 1250 cross in Mendoza plain, Argentina. Journal of the Professional Association for Cactus Development. 13: 48-62.
18. Guevara, J. C.; Estevez, O. R. 2018. Sustainable use of rangelands of the Mendoza plain (Argentina). Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. 50(1): 295-307.
19. Gutiérrez, J. R.; Meserve, P. L.; Contreras, L. C.; Vásquez, H.; Jaksic, F. M. 1993. Spatial distribution of soil nutrients and ephemeral plants underneath and outside the canopy of Porlieria chilensis shrubs (Zygophyllaceae) in arid coastal Chile. Oecologia. 95: 347-352.
20. Horno, M. E. 1993. Interceptación de la precipitación por algarrobo. In: IADIZA (Ed.), Contribuciones mendocinas a la quinta reunión regional para América Latina y el Caribe de la Red de Forestación del CIID. Conservación y mejoramiento de especies del género Prosopis. Mendoza. Argentina. IADIZA. 93-97.
21. InfoStat. 2008. InfoStat version 2008. Grupo InfoStat, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina.