The objective of the present work is to determine the acid binding capacity (ABC) of feed ingredients (inorganic, animal, and plant sources) and diets (layer mash and pelleted broiler diets) used in poultry nutrition. The measurements were made at three pH points (4, 3 and 2) to examine the best pH point for the ABC estimation which was a secondary objective of the study. The results showed that the limestone and oyster shell had the highest ABC at all pH points. The ABC of limestone was variable depending on the source. The ABC of 10 limestone samples ranged from 8,261-13,459 mEq/kg at pH 4; 9,836-15,566 mEq/kg at pH 3 and 16,010- 22,393 mEq/kg at pH 2. Next to inorganic sources, animal-based ingredients had higher ABC with an average of 632 1,122 and 2,449 mEq/kg, at pH 4, 3 and 2, respectively. Among the plant-based sources, cereals had the lowest ABC (960 mEq/kg at pH 2) compared to the plantprotein sources (1,590 mEq/kg at pH 2) and cereal-by products (1,216 mEq/kg at pH 2). Layer mash had a higher ABC (5,846 mEq/kg at pH 2) when compared to broiler diets (1,275-1,446 mEq/kg at pH 2). In conclusion, limestone was the most consequential ingredient in terms of increasing ABC. The variability in ABC among different limestone sources may have implications for nutrient utilisation and absorption. The most suitable pH point was pH 2, as the readings were more stable at this pH and it is more relevant to the pH in the foregut of poultry.

Amerah, A. M., Plumstead, P. W., Barnard, L. P., & Kumar, A. (2014). Poultry Science, 93, 906–915.
Anwar, M. N., Ravindran, V., Morel, P. C. H., Ravindran, G., & Cowieson, A. J. (2016). Poultry Science, 95, 70–76.
Duke, G. E. (1986). In P. D. Sturkie (Ed.), Avian Physiology (pp. 289–302). Springer-Verlag, New York.
Gilani, A., Kermanshahi, H., Golian, A., Gholizadeh, M., & Mohammadpour, A. A. (2013). Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 3, 687–694.
Gilani, S., Mereu, A., Li, W., Plumstead, P. W., Angel, R., Wilks, G., & Dersjant-Li, Y. (2022). Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition, 10, 19–30.
Kennedy, D. J., Leibach, F. H., Ganapathy, V., & Thwaites, D. T. (2002). Pflügers Archiv – European Journal of Physiology, 445, 139–146.
Lawlor, P. G., Lynch, P. B., Caffrey, P. J., O’Reilly, J. J., & O’Connell, M. K. (2005). Irish Veterinary Journal, 58, 447–452.
Lee, S. A., Dunne, J., Febery, E., Brearley, C. A., Mottram, T., & Bedford, M. R. (2018). British Poultry Science, 59, 568–578.
Lu, N., Arnaut, P., & Lindemann, M. D. (2016). Journal of Animal Science, 94, 121 (Abstract).
Moss, A. F., Ghane, A., Dersjant-Li, Y., Dao, T. H., Suleman, M., Morgan, N., & Crowley, T. M. (2022). Proceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium, 33, 85–88.
Ravindran, V. (2013). Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 22, 628–636.
Shafey, T. M., McDonald, M. W., & Dingle, J. G. (1991). British Poultry Science, 32, 185–194.
Steel, A., Nussberger, S., Romero, M. F., Boron, W. F., Boyd, C. A., & Hediger, M. A. (1997). Journal of Physiology, 498, 563–569.



