Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

Effect of dietary sodium diformate on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, gut health and profitability in broilers

Published: October 5, 2015
By: Christian Lückstädt
Abstract
Dietary formic acid and its salts act against pathogens, helping to decrease pressure on the immune system and improving nutrient digestibility. The use of the double sodium salt of formic acid, with the same antimicrobial properties as formic acid, but with improved handling properties, has become more prevalent in poultry diets. In a trial conducted at a research farm in Taiwan, sodium diformate (NaDF; 0.3% inclusion rate) was tested in a typical corn-soy diet, against a similar control diet containing no acidifier. 120 day-old broiler chicks (male Arbor Acres) were randomly selected and divided into 2 treatment groups with 3 replicates each. Feed and water were available ad libitum. The effects of NaDF on performance (final weight, FCR, broiler index), protein utilization and villi height were examined after 39 days. Data were analysed using the t-test and a confidence level of 95% was defined for these analyses.
Performance was boosted in the birds fed 0.3% NaDF. Treated birds were significantly heavier (2551 g vs. 2316 g; P<0.05), while the FCR improved only numerically (1.67 vs. 1.71). Protein utilization was also numerically better (63.3% vs. 61.6%), while the villi height in the jejunum and ileum was significantly increased by between 170 and 450 µm.  
This study demonstrates that including NaDF in broiler diets is beneficial to performance, nutrient utilization and gut health and thereby increases the gross profit of broiler operations.
Keywords: broiler, sodium diformate, performance, digestibility
Introduction
Organic acids have a long history of use in animal nutrition, where they are usually added to stabilize compound feed, but also to enhance animal performance. While most early data on this class of additives were collected from studies in pig production (Cole et al., 1968; covering sows, piglets and fatteners), the available literature indicates a later focus on such additives in poultry production. One of the first reports of improved broiler performance when diets were supplemented with a single organic acid was for formic acid (Vogt et al., 1981).
Improvements in broiler performance or their hygienic production conditions with the aid of a variety of organic acids have been reported by many sources, as reviewed by Desai et al. (2007). An important limitation, however, is that organic acids are rapidly metabolised in the fore-gut (crop to gizzard) of birds, which can reduce their impact on growth performance. A newer salt of formic acid, sodium diformate (NaDF), has been demonstrated to be effective against pathogenic bacteria, including salmonella, throughout gastro-intestinal tract (Lückstädt and Theobald, 2009). Reducing the impact of pathogenic bacteria on the broiler, and improving the gut microflora, leads to a state of eubiosis in treated chickens and suggests that the inclusion of diformate in broiler diets can also improve bird performance. This hypothesis was confirmed statistically with a meta-analysis of data from trials carried out in recent years (Lückstädt, 2013). This study analyzed the average impact reported from all studies on the effect of the additive on the performance parameters weight gain, feed efficiency, mortality and productivity. However, these trials focused on weight gain and feed conversion outputs. This study aimed to investigate the effects of sodium diformate on growth performance parameters as well as nutrient digestibility and gut health in broilers.
Material and Methods
The trial was conducted at the research farm in Taiwan. One hundred and twenty day-old male Arbor Acres broilers were randomly allotted into 2 treatment groups, with 3 replications and 20 birds in each pen. The commercially-available corn-soy-based feed in one group contained 0.3% NaDF; this group was compared against a negative control. Feed and water were provided ad libitum. Birds were weighed individually after 14 and 39 days; feed consumption was recorded per pen at the end of the trial. The effects of NaDF on performance (final weight, feed conversion ratio, European Broiler Index EBI), protein utilization and villi height were examined after 39 days.
Data were analysed using the t-test and a confidence level of 95% was defined for these analyses.
Results
The inclusion of 0.3% NaDF in the diets of broilers for 39 days exerted significant effects on performance as well as protein digestibility in the birds.
The effect of the additive was already noticeable after only 14 days. At this stage, the body weight of the broilers receiving NaDF had increased significantly (P<0.05), by almost 21% (Table 1). At the end of the trial, treated birds were still significantly heavier (2551 g vs. 2316 g; P<0.05), while the FCR improved numerically (1.67 vs. 1.71). Furthermore, the mortality rate of birds was substantially reduced by 50%. As a result, the European Broiler Index, which includes the three most important productivity parameters in animal production – weight gain, survival and feed efficiency – improved markedly by almost 15%.
Table 1: Performance parameters of broilers fed with or without NaDF at 0.3% for 39 days
 
Negative control
0.3% NaDF
Difference [%]
BW-14 days [g]
320b
386a
+20.6
Final weight [kg]
2.316b
2.551a
+10.1
ADG [g]
58b
64a
+10.3
FCR
1.71
1.67
-2.3
Mortality [%]
3.33
1.67
-50
EBI*
329
378
+14.9
Means with a different superscript differ significantly at P<0.05
*EBI = Daily weight gain (g) x Survival (%) / 10 x FCR
Villus height in the jejunum and ileum of birds at 39 days showed a significant increase in birds fed 0.3% NaDF compared to controls (Table 2).
Table 2: Effect of sodium diformate (0.3%) on the morphology of the jejunum and ileum of broilers after 39 days.
 
Negative control
0.3% NaDF
Difference [%]
Jejunum - Villus height [µm]
1268b
1721a
+35.7
Ileum - Villus height [µm]
1011b
1184a
+17.1
Means with a different superscript differ significantly at P<0.05
Analysis of the protein utilization of the diets showed a numerical increase from 61.6% to 63.3% in the birds fed diets containing NaDF. This substantial improvement, of almost 3% in total, may be related to the larger intestinal surface area in NaDF fed birds due to the longer villi.
Similar trends (improved performance parameters as well as nutrient utilization) were reported as a result of a holo-analysis of 59 published studies for potassium diformate in pig diets (Rosen, as reported by Lückstädt and Mellor, 2011). In broilers, improved zootechnical performance is thought to arise as a result of improved intestinal microflora, through suppressing pathogenic bacterial species; and improved protein digestion. This was supported by the present study as well as in a previous report under similar conditions (Lückstädt, 2014).
Conclusions
As often seen with other additives, the performance improvements recorded are also influenced in part by the hygienic conditions. The current study was conducted at the research farm of a university. This study shows that even under these rather “clean” conditions, NaDF was able to significantly improve bird performance. Under practical conditions with a higher anticipated “bacterial load”, conditions might weigh even more in favour of the additive effects measured. This has been seen with other trials under commercial conditions. It can therefore be concluded that dietary sodium diformate can play an important role in improving broiler production.
Literature
  • Cole, D.J.A., R.M. Beal and J.R. Luscombe (1968). The effect on performance and bacterial flora of lactic acid, propionic acid, calcium propionate and calcium acrylate in the drinking water of weaned pigs. Veterinary Record 83: 459-464.
  • DESAI, D., D. PATWARDHAN and A. RANADE (2007). Acidifiers in Poultry Diets and Poultry Production. In: LÜCKSTÄDT, C.: Acidifiers in Animal Nutrition – A Guide for Feed preservation and Acidification to Promote Animal Performance. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, ISBN 978-1-904761-40-2, 63-69.
  • LÜCKSTÄDT, C. and P. THEOBALD (2009). Effect of a formic acid-sodium formate premixture on Salmonella, Campylobacter and further gut microbiota in broilers. Proceedings and Abstracts of the 17th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, 246.
  • Lückstädt, C. and S. Mellor (2011). The use of organic acids in animal nutrition, with special focus on dietary potassium diformate under European and Austral-Asian conditions. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition – Australia 18: 123-130.
  • LÜCKSTÄDT, C. (2013). Effects of sodium diformate in broilers – a performance analysis. Proceedings and Abstracts of the 19th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, 191.
  • LÜCHSTÄDT, C. (2014). Effect of dietary sodium diformate on growth performance and nutrient utilization in broilers. Proceedings of the XIVth European Poultry Conference, 476.
  • VOGT, H., S. MATTHES and S. HARNISCH (1981). Der Einfluß organischer Säuren auf die Leistungen von Broilern und Legehennen. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 45: 221-232.
 
Content from the event:
Related topics:
Authors:
Christian Lückstädt
ADDCON
Recommend
Comment
Share
Christian Lückstädt
ADDCON
26 de octubre de 2015
Dear Dr. Murtaza, that would surprise me! Sodium diformate is a mixture of formic acid and sodium formate bound together by a hydrogen bound, thus the conncetion can be only in-tact in a dry state. In a liquid state that bound would be not available; as such in a liquid form the product would be a regular mixture of formic acid and sodium formate.
Recommend
Reply
Christian Lückstädt
ADDCON
20 de octubre de 2015
Dear Malay, in poultry feed usually between 1-2 kg/t. In case of bacterial challenge the dosage shall be increased to 3 kg/t. If you want to know more about the use of NaDF in India, please contact Dr. Anant Deshpande under anant.deshpande@addcon.com
Recommend
Reply
Christian Lückstädt
ADDCON
19 de octubre de 2015
Dear Vijay, thanks for the update! Yes, you can combine the above listed enzymes with NaDF, however I would do this in the feed only. We have not tested the storage of a blend of acids and enzymes over time, thus I cant recommend whether such a mixture is stable on its own. In case you have further detailed questions you may contact me via christian.lueckstaedt@addcon.com
Recommend
Reply
Christian Lückstädt
ADDCON
19 de octubre de 2015
Dear Vijay, combination of organic acids and enzymes is often a good idea - in the case of phytase and organic acids it even works synergistically, as the phytase has an optimum pH which is acidic. Therefore I would assume that the combination is effective. What type of enzymes do you plan to use? And what do you mean with stabilizer? Sodium diformate is used without any additional stabilizers in broiler feed.
Recommend
Reply
Dr Nadeem Murtaza
25 de octubre de 2015
Nadf is available in liquid form as a commercial form. Dear christian.
Recommend
Reply
malay addhya
19 de octubre de 2015
WHAT AMOUNT NADF IS USED IN FEED
Recommend
Reply
vijay savaliya
19 de octubre de 2015
Dear Sir I just want to try NaDF with enzymes like[ Xylanase,cellulase , phytase and protease]. And can we try this combination with powder form? Enzymes have their activities and with different temp/pH they are not stabilize and also for microbial contents can affect to product so I meant for stabilizer
Recommend
Reply
vijay savaliya
19 de octubre de 2015
can we provide 0.3% NaDF with the enzymes as a stabilizer??? and is that effective for broilers???
Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Poultry Industry
Padma Pillai
Padma Pillai
Cargill
United States
Shivaram Rao
Shivaram Rao
Pilgrim´s
PhD Director Principal de Nutrición y Servicios Técnicos de Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation
United States
Karen Christensen
Karen Christensen
Tyson
Tyson
PhD, senior director of animal welfare at Tyson Foods
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.