Differences between phytases available in the marketplace relate to the amounts of enzyme needed to release phosphorus and calcium, their endogenous or exogenous heat stability, and their efficacy at different gastrointestinal pH levels. Differences also exist regarding organisms of origin of these enzymes, as well as whether such organisms have been genetically modified. This study evaluated the live performance, bone characteristics and calcium/ phosphorus utilization with the supplementation of broiler feeds with a novel phytase. Treatments were: T1 - 0.17 available phosphorus (Av P), T2 - 0.23 Av P, T3 - 0.29 Av P, T4 -0.35 Av P, T5 - 0.17 P Av P + 500 phytase activity units (FYT), T6 - 0.17 Av P + 1000 FYT and T7 - 0.17 Av P + 2000 FYT. feed intake, feed conversion rate, and body weight gain were analyzed, as well as tibia ash, calcium and phosphorus, mineral digestibility and mortality. Phytase-supplemented birds were statistically superior for the parameters evaluated, as compared to birds without the enzyme. Performance improvements increased as phytase levels increased. Results suggest that the use of this enzyme may provide a competitive strategy to improve the use of nutrients in poultry diets based on corn and soybean meal. The amounts of Av P released by the phytase was estimated using a linear equation among animal responses to gradual reductions in Av P. For each phytase dose utilized the response was plotted against a similar responses obtained when equivalent dicalcium phosphate was added. These values are 0.053, 0.140 and 0.196 for 500, 1000 and 2000 FYT, respectively.
Key Words: Performance, Minerals on tibia, Digestibility.
Treatment
|
Available
P
|
Total P
Analyzed
|
Phytase, FYT/kg
|
Phytase recovery, FYT/kg
|
T1
|
0.17
|
0.45
|
-
|
-
|
T2
|
0.23
|
0.48
|
-
|
-
|
T3
|
0.29
|
0.56
|
-
|
-
|
T4
|
0.35
|
0.63
|
-
|
-
|
T5
|
0.17
|
0.43
|
500
|
497
|
T6
|
0.17
|
0.42
|
1,000
|
1,296
|
T7
|
0.17
|
0.46
|
2,000
|
1,917
|
Treatment
|
FI, g
|
WG, g
|
FCR
|
Mort., %
|
T1 - 0.17 Pd
|
471d
|
305d
|
1.541c
|
72.50b
|
T2 - 0.23 Pd
|
732c
|
504c
|
1.456bc
|
13.33a
|
T3 - 0.29 Pd
|
1,141ab
|
832ab
|
1.371ab
|
1.66a
|
T4 - 0.35 Pd
|
1,168a
|
891a
|
1.312a
|
0.00a
|
T5 - 0.17 Pd + 500 FYT
|
801bc
|
553bc
|
1.446bc
|
14.00a
|
T6 - 0.17 Pd + 1,000 FYT
|
968b
|
717b
|
1.348ab
|
6.66a
|
T7 - 0.17 Pd + 2,000 FYT
|
1,131ab
|
862a
|
1.304a
|
2.00a
|
Means
|
945
|
691
|
1.391
|
14.19
|
CV, %
|
8.17
|
7.65
|
3.40
|
24.60
|
Probability, %
|
<0.0001
|
<0.0001
|
<0.0001
|
<0.0001
|
Treatments
|
Ash, %
|
Ca, %
|
P, %
|
T1 - 0.17 Pd
|
41.17bc
|
16.56b
|
8.41a
|
T2 - 0.23 Pd
|
41.33bc
|
16.38bc
|
7.71bc
|
T3 - 0.29 Pd
|
42.66bc
|
15.18c
|
7.67c
|
T4 - 0.35 Pd
|
44.81a
|
16.70ab
|
8.58a
|
T5 - 0.17 Pd + 500 FYT
|
41.12c
|
15.36 b
|
7.82bc
|
T6 - 0.17 Pd + 1,000 FYT
|
43.92ab
|
17.58a
|
8.27ab
|
T7 - 0.17 Pd + 2,000 FYT
|
45.80a
|
17.33a
|
8.31a
|
Means
|
43.26
|
16.37
|
8.09
|
CV, %
|
4.95
|
8.36
|
6.88
|
Probability
|
<.0001
|
<.0001
|
<.0001
|
Treatments
|
DM, %
|
Ca, %
|
P, %
|
T1 - 0.17 Pd
|
68.28c
|
43.62
|
49.57c
|
T2 - 0.23 Pd
|
68.57bc
|
45.8
|
52.00c
|
T3 - 0.29 Pd
|
72.60ab
|
46.06
|
49.33c
|
T4 - 0.35 Pd
|
71.28abc
|
41.72
|
49.65c
|
T5 - 0.17 Pd + 500 FYT
|
70.18abc
|
44.62
|
57.97bc
|
T6 - 0.17 Pd + 1,000 FYT
|
71.38abc
|
47.23
|
59.57ab
|
T7 - 0.17 Pd + 2,000 FYT
|
73.20a
|
47.29
|
69.96a
|
Means
|
70.90
|
45.77
|
56.74
|
CV, %
|
3.01
|
13.8
|
13.59
|
Probability
|
0.0029
|
0.7123
|
0.0002
|
Resp.
|
Equation
|
Prob.
|
r2
|
WG
|
Y = -7474.8x² + 6953.8x - 658.09
|
<.0001
|
0.9331
|
FCR
|
Y = 4.3821x² - 3.6471x + 2.0389
|
<.0001
|
0.7982
|
FI
|
Y = -0.7314x2 + 51.935x + 377.54
|
<.0001
|
0.8511
|
Mort.
|
Y = 3963x² - 2429.3x + 368.64
|
<.0001
|
0.8430
|
Digest. P
|
Y = 190.96x2 + 4.2118x +44.387
|
<.0001
|
0.6803
|
Digest. DM
|
Y = 5.248x2 + 29.277x +63.531
|
0.0029
|
0.3758
|
Tibial ash
|
Y = 111.81x2 + 29.105x +42.458
|
<.0001
|
0.4384
|
Tibial Ca
|
Y = 19.979x2 - 1.0733x +15.361
|
0.0455
|
0.1490
|
Tibial P
|
Y = 0.0005x2 - 0.00073x +8.0972
|
<.0001
|
0.0281
|