Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

Heat stress modulates the disruptive effects of Eimeria maxima infection on the ileum nutrient digestibility, molecular transporters, and tissue morphology in meat-type chickens

Published: June 3, 2024
By: Ahmed F. A. Ghareeb 1; Gustavo H. Schneiders 1, a; Jennifer N. Richter 1; James C. Foutz 1, b; Marie C. Milfort 1; Albert L. Fuller 1; Jianmin Yuan 2; Romdhane Rekaya 3; Samuel E. Aggrey 1.
Summary

Author details:

1 Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America; 2 State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, Peoples Republic of China; 3 Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
a Current address: Merck Animal Health, Madison, New Jersey, United States of America.
b Current address: Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health (BIAH), Gainesville, Georgia, United States of America.

Eimeria (E.) maxima is one of the most pathogenic Eimeria spp persistently invading the middle jejunum and ileum, damaging the intestinal mucosa of chickens. Heat stress (HS) is a common stressor and equally contributes to inflammation and oxidative stress. We investigated the effect of E. maxima infection and HS on ileal digestibility, mRNA expression of nutrient transporters, and ileal tissue morphology in broiler chickens. There were four treatment groups: thermoneutral control (TNc), thermoneutral infected (TNi), heat stress control (HSc), and heat stress infected (HSi), 6 replicates each of 10 birds per treatment. Chickens were fed a diet containing 0.2% TiO2. At 6-day-post infection, ileal content and tissue were collected to quantify ileal digestibility of crude protein and fat, mRNA levels of nutrient transporters and histopathology. Growth and feed intake were reduced in all treatment groups, compared with the TNc. Contrary to expectation, the combination of two major stressors (E. maxima and HS) in the TNi group exhibited almost normal digestibility while only the TNi birds expressed severe digestibility depression, compared with the TNc group. The TNi group showed the lowest mRNA expression of the transporters: SGLT1, GLUT2-5-8-10-12, FABP1-2-6, and PEPT1 compared with the other treatment groups. The expression of the absorptive enterocytes’ gene markers (ACSL5, IAP, and SGLT1) supported by the ileal tissue morphology indicated that the TNi group had the highest enterocytic destruction. The expression of oxidative genes (iNOS and CYBB) dramatically increased only in the TNi group compared with the other treatment groups. Our results showed that exposing broiler chickens to HS can mitigate the disruptive effect of E. maxima on the ileal digestibility and absorption by limiting the parasite-induced tissue injury and suppressing the enterocytic inducible oxidative damage.

Introduction

Coccidiosis is a parasitic infection caused by Eimeria spp and persistently affecting broiler chicken, causing high morbidity, impaired growth, and mortality [1]. Unlike many other protozoan parasites, Eimeria spp exclusively invades the intestinal epithelium showing high tissue specificity [2]. Eimeria (E.) maxima is characterized by producing the largest oocysts and male gamonts among the other species infecting chicken [3]. E. maxima particularly infects chickens at proximal and distal to Meckel’s diverticulum of the mid-gut and along the ileum and generates a huge number of merogonic stages, destroying the intestinal mucosa and excessively impacting the digestibility and absorption of most nutrients. Eventually, the intestine undergoes vast areas of enterocytic damage and epithelial sloughing, predisposing for the invasion of other pathogenic organisms [4, 5]. The shortening of the intestinal villi and crypt cell hyperplasia are remarkable consequences of Eimeria infection and reflect the pathological impact of the parasite on the intestinal tissue [6]. The severity of E. maxima infection depends on many factors, such as the strain, number of ingested sporulated oocytes, birds’ immunity status, and intestinal integrity [7, 8].
High ambient temperature is a widespread seasonal environmental stressor in broilers’ houses in temperate regions, and endemic in subtropical and tropical regions. Several studies have shown that exposing the broiler chickens to acute or chronic heat stress (HS) results in a severe reduction in feed intake and growth, and an increase of feed conversion ratio [9–11]. Even though HS slightly improves nutrient and amino acid digestibility, some reports have shown that such improvements are not statistically significant [10, 11].
The ileum plays a fundamental role in nutrient absorption by expressing various types of transporters and binding proteins. Monosaccharides are transported by a group of solute carriers and protein co-transporters that may or may not depend on insulin to be expressed on the enterocytic cell membrane [12]. Facultative glucose transporters (GLUTs) are responsible for transporting monosaccharide molecules in enterocytes and are classified based on phylogenetic structure into three classes: Class I includes GLUTs 1–4, and GLUT14 in human, class II is made up of GLUTs 5, 7, 9, and 11, class III consists of GLUTs 6, 8, 10, 12, and H+ /myoinositol transporter (HMIT/ GLUT13) [13, 14]. Enterocytes also express an active sodium-glucose symporter (SGLT1) on the apical membrane that utilizes the concentration gradient of Na+ to transfer glucose against its concentration [15]. Absorption of lipids and fatty acids occur through fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) and fatty acid transport proteins (FATPs) that are expressed on the apical membrane of the intestinal mucosal cells [16, 17]. The di- and tripeptides are absorbed via H+ -dependent peptide transporters (PEPT1 and PEPT2), and peptide/histidine transporter 1 (PHT1) [18, 19]. The intestinal digestibility and mRNA expression of nutrient transporters have been used as a physiological and functional indicator of the enteric mucosal integrity and gut health of the broiler chickens under various pathological or stress conditions [20–22].
The acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 5 (ACSL5) encodes for an enzyme responsible for activating the long-chain fatty acid to acyl-CoA that is required in various cellular functions [23]. Intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP) is a tissue-specific catalase enzyme that mediates the removal of phosphate groups from different cell molecules [23, 24]. The ACSL5, IAP, and SGLT1 (SLC5A1) genes are found to be highly expressed in the intestinal epithelia cells, especially the villus enterocytes, compared to the other intestinal cell types [24, 25]. The expression level of those genes, ACSL5, IAP, and SGLT1, can be used as a relative quantitative estimator for the abundance of villus absorptive enterocytes [26].
Our objective was to investigate the digestibility, molecular expression of nutrient transporters, ileum function and enterocyte damage in broiler chickens infected with E. maxima and reared under either thermoneutral or chronic HS condition. We hypothesized that the combined effects of HS and E. maxima infection would more gravely affect intestinal digestibility, function, and tissue architecture than their independent effects.

Materials and methods

All experiments in this study were implemented under the Animal Use Proposal (AUP) number A2015 04–005 approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Georgia.

Experimental design and sampling

We conducted an experiment with two continues temperature levels (20˚C and 35˚C) and two infection levels (infected and control). E. maxima sporulated oocysts were obtained from a single oocyst cloning using North Carolina field strain. The infectious dose and dose preparation were detailed in Schneiders et al. [27]. One hundred and twenty 14-days old Ross708 broiler male chickens were randomly distributed into 12 cages and gavage-infected with 2x105 E. maxima sporulated oocysts/bird suspended in distilled water and housed at two rooms of different temperature levels 20˚C (TNi) or 35˚C (HSi). Another 120 chickens were mock-infected with distilled water and randomly allocated into 12 cages in two other rooms at 20˚C (TNc) or 35˚C. The chickens were raised in their respective temperature continuously for 14 dpi. All chickens were raised in wired-floor cages, provided with ad libitum water and fed on a grower corn-soybean meal-based diet containing 0.2% titanium oxide. The experiment duration was two weeks. The chickens’ health and behavior were monitored twice daily. The human end point was considered to euthanize the bird upon showing inability to reach feed and water, sever respiratory distress, or severely emaciation (body score 1). The E. maxima infection was confirmed by detecting the oocysts shed in feces at 6 dpi and also by visualizing the coccidia stages in the histological images. The analysis of the feed is presented in S1 Table. Body weights were individually recorded on the day of infection (day 0) and at 4, 5, 6, 7, and 14 day-post-infection (dpi). Feed intake was recorded on 0, 7, and 14 dpi. At 6 dpi, seven chickens from each treatment group were randomly collected, and euthanized humanely by cervical dislocation to sample about 1 cm of whole ileum tissue (posterior to the Meckel’s diverticulum) (n = 5/treatment group). Ileum tissue samples were flushed with phosphate buffered saline, collected in cryovials and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in -86˚C for long-term storage (n = 5). Also, ileal contents were gently squeezed and collected in aluminum foil containers from all cages (n = 6/ treatment). The cloacal temperature was recorded at 0, 3, and 6 dpi using CVS1 Health Digital Flexible Tip Thermometer (CVS Health, USA). Two mortalities were recorded in the HSi group, one found dead at 3 dpi and one humanly euthanized at 6 dpi.

Apparent digestibility

Ileal content samples were dried overnight in a hot oven at 75˚C and stored at -80˚C. Samples then were sent to the Agricultural Experiment Station Chemical Laboratories (ESCL), University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. Crude protein and crude fat concentrations were determined in the feed and the dried ileal digesta samples using standardized methods (Combustion Analysis (LECO) AOAC Official Method 990.03, 2006) and (Ether Extraction, AOAC Official Method 920.39 (a)), respectively [28]. The apparent ileal digestibility was calculated as proposed by Edwards and Gillis [29]:
Apparent ileal Digestibility ðAIDÞ

Nucleic acid extraction

mRNA was extracted from the ileal tissue samples using the trizol-chloroform method. Precisely, 100 mg of frozen ileal tissue was homogenized with 1 mL of trizol using Benchmark BeadBlaster Microtube Homogenizer1 (OVERSTOCK Lab Equipment, NH, USA), followed by phase separation by adding 0.2 mL of chloroform, vortex mixing, incubation at room temperature (RT) for 3 minutes, and centrifugation (12000 rpm, 4˚C, for 15 min). Carefully, 550μL of the aqueous phase was transferred into a tube containing 0.5 mL of isopropanol for RNA precipitation, vortexed and incubated at RT for 10 min. The tubes were then spun by centrifugation (12000 rpm, 10 min, 4˚C), and the supernatant was removed. The pellet was washed with 1mL of 75% ethanol by vortexing, followed by centrifugation (12,000 rpm, 5 min, 4˚C). After supernatant removal, the tube containing RNA pellet was incubated in RT for 10 min. The pellet was re-suspended in 100μL of nuclease-free water followed by incubation at 55–60˚C for 10 min, then stored at -80˚C. RNA was cleaned using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer‘s protocol.

Gene expression

The concentrations of the purified RNA samples were measured using a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fischer Scientific, DE, USA) and then diluted to the concentration of 200 ng/μl by nuclease-free water. Reverse transcription was performed by adding 10 μL of diluted RNA to High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fischer Scientific, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, using a Gradient Mastercycler (Eppendorf, NY, USA) adjusted for repeated cycles: 10 minutes at 25˚C, 120 minutes at 37˚C, 5 minutes at 85˚C, and the final cycle at 4˚C. Transcribed cDNA samples were stored at -25˚C. The concentration of each samples’ cDNA was measured using NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer and then was diluted to 20 ng/μl prior to quantitative analysis. Each RT-qPCR reaction was composed of 2 μL of diluted cDNA, 0.3 μL of each forward and reverse primers (10μM) (S2 Table), 7.4 μL of nuclease-free water, and 10 μL of Fast SYBRTM Green Master Mix1 (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). Each reaction was run in triplicates. The RT-qPCR was conducted using StepOnePlus (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) and set to 50˚C for 120s, then 95˚C for 120s, proceeded by 40 cycles of 95˚C for 15s and 60˚C for 60s, with measuring Ct values at the endpoint of each cycle and recording the melting temperature curve. The threshold cycle values (Ct) of interest genes were normalized against the Ct values of the β-actin gene (endogenous control), and the fold increase was calculated versus the control group (TNc). The relative mRNA expression was analyzed using 2-ΔΔCt method [30] for the following genes; sugar transporters: SGLT1, GLUT1, GLUT2, GLUT5, GLUT8, GLUT10, and GLUT12; fatty acid transporters: FABP1, FABP2, FABP6, and FATP1; peptide transporters: PEPT1, PEPT2, and PHT1; villus enterocytes markers: ACSL5 and IAP; and oxidative genes: iNOS and CYBB.

Histology and ileum morphological analysis

A 2 cm segment of ileum tissue was collected from each of seven randomly selected individuals from each treatment group and immediately fixed in 10% buffered formaldehyde solution. The fixed tissue samples were washed, alcohol dehydrated, trimmed into cassettes, and then embedded into paraffin. The tissue was then sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The stained sections were examined, and images were captured using KEYENCE BZ-X8101 (Osaka, Japan) at 100x magnification for illustration. The ileum tissue images were captured at 40x magnification and then ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD) was used to acquire the following indices: The villus height from the villus tip to the companion crypt, the crypt depth from the crypt top to the submucosa, and the ratio of villus height to crypt depth (villus:crypt). All the intact straight villi were measured after which five villus-crypt measurements were randomly selected for each sample using an online randomizing website (Randomlists.com) prior to statistical analysis (n = 35 measurement per treatment).

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was established with the SAS1 Studio software (SAS, 2018), using a two-way ANOVA model. The statistical model implemented was:
statistical model implemented
where μ is the overall mean of the response, αi is the effect of temperature, where i = 20 or 35; βj is the effect of infection status, where j = infected or uninfected; (αβ)ij represents the interaction of temperature and infection, and the εijk is the random error. We analyzed the cloacal temperature, growth, feed intake, feed conversion ratio (FCR), apparent nutrients digestibility, the nutrients transporter expression, the mRNA expression of the absorptive enterocyte gene markers, oxidative genes, and ileum morphology parameters among the groups. Differences among treatments were tested using the “Tukey’s HSD” option. The significant differences between treatment groups (TNc, TNi, HSc, and HSi) were declared at p< 0.05.

Results

Heat stress and E. maxima infection impact the chickens’ performance

The cloacal temperature records revealed a significant increase (0.6–1.0˚C) in the HS groups (infected and control) at 3 and 6 dpi, compared with the TN groups (Fig 1). Both HS and E. maxima infection affected the growth of the chickens (Fig 2A). All the treatment groups showed a significant reduction in growth at 6 dpi (P< 0.05), compared with the TNc group. The infected groups (HS and TN) had lower average body weight than the HSc group, but the difference was not significant. The TNi had the lowest average body weight at 7 dpi, followed by the HSi group and then the HSc group when compared to the TNc group, and all the differences in means were significant (P< 0.05). At 14 dpi, the TNc group had the highest (P< 0.05) body weight with no significant differences among the TNi and HSi or between HSc and HSi groups. The HSi group showed the lowest average body weight (Fig 2A). Heat stress and E. maxima infection also affected feed intake and FCR in chickens as illustrated in Fig 2B and 2C, respectively. The cumulative feed intake of the TNi, HSc, and HSi groups were significantly reduced by 47%, 31%, and 60% at 7 dpi, and 32%, 52%, and 51% at 14 dpi when compared to the TNc group, respectively (Fig 2B). At 7 dpi, the HSi had the lowest FCR compared to the other groups (P< 0.05), and there were no differences among TNc and HSc (Fig 2C). At 14 dpi, the FCR of the TN groups were not significantly different but they were both higher than that in HS groups. However, the differences between the FCR of the TNi chickens and the HS chickens (control and infected) were approaching significance (p = 0.078 and 0.076, respectively).
Fig 1. Cloacal temperature. Cloacal temperature of chickens infected with E. maxima and their uninfected controls that are raised in a thermoneutral or heat stress environment: TNc = thermoneutral control, TNi = thermoneutral infected, HSc = heat stress control, HSi = heat stress infected. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.
Fig 1. Cloacal temperature. Cloacal temperature of chickens infected with E. maxima and their uninfected controls that are raised in a thermoneutral or heat stress environment: TNc = thermoneutral control, TNi = thermoneutral infected, HSc = heat stress control, HSi = heat stress infected. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.
Fig 2. Chickens’ growth, feed intake, and FCR. The average body weight at 4, 5, 6, 7, and 14 dpi (A), feed intake at 7 and 14 dpi (B), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) at 7 and 14 dpi (C) of chickens infected with E. maxima and their uninfected controls that are raised in a thermoneutral or heat stress environment: TNc = thermoneutral control, TNi = thermoneutral infected, HSc = heat stress control, HSi = heat stress infected. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.
Fig 2. Chickens’ growth, feed intake, and FCR. The average body weight at 4, 5, 6, 7, and 14 dpi (A), feed intake at 7 and 14 dpi (B), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) at 7 and 14 dpi (C) of chickens infected with E. maxima and their uninfected controls that are raised in a thermoneutral or heat stress environment: TNc = thermoneutral control, TNi = thermoneutral infected, HSc = heat stress control, HSi = heat stress infected. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.
Fig 3. Chickens’ ileal crude protein and fat digestibility. The crude protein and crude fat apparent ileal digestibility at 6 dpi of chickens infected with E. maxima and their uninfected controls that are raised in a thermoneutral or heat stress environment: TNc = thermoneutral control, TNi = thermoneutral infected, HSc = heat stress control, HSi = heat stress infected. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.
Fig 3. Chickens’ ileal crude protein and fat digestibility. The crude protein and crude fat apparent ileal digestibility at 6 dpi of chickens infected with E. maxima and their uninfected controls that are raised in a thermoneutral or heat stress environment: TNc = thermoneutral control, TNi = thermoneutral infected, HSc = heat stress control, HSi = heat stress infected. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.

E. maxima infection reduces the nutrients digestibility

The AID for crude protein decreased by 50% in the TNi group compared to the other groups (Fig 3), and there were no differences among the TNc, HSc and HSi groups. The AID for crude fat was the lowest in the TNi group and decreased by 77% compared to the TNc group (Fig 3), and there was no difference in crude fat AID between the TNc and HSc; whereas, HSi had significantly lower (14%) crude fat AID compared to the TNc group (Fig 3).

Both heat stress and E. maxima infection alters the mRNA expression of the ileum nutrient transporters

The mRNA expression of the ileal hexose transporters are depicted in Fig 4. SGLT1 and GLUT2 were downregulated in the infected groups (TN and HS) compared to the TNc group. GLUT1 was upregulated in the TNi group compared to the TNc group. The expression levels of GLUT5, 10, and 12 were downregulated in the infected groups but upregulated in the HSc group compared with the TNc group. GLUT8 expression was downregulated in all treatment groups compared to the TNc group. The HSi chickens’ expression levels of all investigated hexose transporters except GLUT1 were higher than those in the TNi group but lower than the expression levels in the HSc chickens.
Fig 4. The mRNA expression of the ileal hexose transporters. The mRNA fold expression of the ileal hexose transporters at 6 dpi of chickens infected with E. maxima and their uninfected controls that are raised in a thermoneutral or heat stress environment: TNc = thermoneutral control, TNi = thermoneutral infected, HSc = heat stress control, HSi = heat stress infected. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.
Fig 4. The mRNA expression of the ileal hexose transporters. The mRNA fold expression of the ileal hexose transporters at 6 dpi of chickens infected with E. maxima and their uninfected controls that are raised in a thermoneutral or heat stress environment: TNc = thermoneutral control, TNi = thermoneutral infected, HSc = heat stress control, HSi = heat stress infected. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.
The expression levels of the ileal fatty acid transporters are displayed in Fig 5. The mRNA expression of FABP1 and FABP6 were downregulated in the TNi group but upregulated in the HSc group compared to the TNc and TNi groups. FABP2 was downregulated in the infected groups compared to uninfected groups. The expression levels of FABP1 and 2 were higher in the HSi group than the TNi group. Only HSi group exhibited downregulation of the FATP1.
The mRNA expression of the ileal peptide transporters is presented in Fig 6. The expression of PEPT1 was downregulated in the TNi group and upregulated in the HSc group compared to the TNc and TNi groups. PEPT2 was upregulated in the HSc group compared to the TN groups (control and infected). The HSi group showed a significant higher expression level of PEPT2 compared with the TNi group. mRNA expression of PHT1 was upregulated in the HSc group but downregulated in the HSi group, when compared with the TN groups. Interestingly, the mRNA expression levels of SGLT1, GLUT2, GLUT5, GLUT8, GLUT10, GLUT12, FABP1, FABP6, PEPT1, and PEPT2 in the HSi chickens were significantly higher than those in the TNi chickens.

The effect of HS and E. maxima infection on the ileum epithelial lining

The TNi group had the lowest mRNA expression levels of both ACSL5 and IAP, compared with the other treatment groups as shown in Fig 7. The ACSL5 was upregulated in the HSc group and downregulated in the HSi group, compared with the TNc group.
The morphology of the ileum tissue is displayed in Fig 8A–8D showing marked crypt depth increase and villus swelling, shortening, and irregularity in the TNi group, compared with the other treatment groups. A significant reduction in villus height was observed in the TNi, HSc, and HSi groups, compared with the TNc group, as demonstrated in Fig 8E. However, the HSi group showed higher villus average than the TNi and HSc groups (p = 0.016). The crypt depth is illustrated in Fig 8F. The TNi group had the deepest crypts, compared with the other treatment groups. Both HS groups (infected and control) expressed a decrease in crypt depth, compared with the TNc group. The villus:crypt ratio is displayed in Fig 8G, revealing that the TNi group had the lowest ratio.
Fig 5. The mRNA expression of the ileal fatty acid transporters. The mRNA fold expression of the ileal fatty acid transporters at 6 dpi of chickens infected with E. maxima and their uninfected controls that are raised in a thermoneutral or heat stress environment: TNc = thermoneutral control, TNi = thermoneutral infected, HSc = heat stress control, HSi = heat stress infected. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.
Fig 5. The mRNA expression of the ileal fatty acid transporters. The mRNA fold expression of the ileal fatty acid transporters at 6 dpi of chickens infected with E. maxima and their uninfected controls that are raised in a thermoneutral or heat stress environment: TNc = thermoneutral control, TNi = thermoneutral infected, HSc = heat stress control, HSi = heat stress infected. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.
The expression levels of the oxidative enzymes are displayed in Fig 9. The TNi group showed a 7-fold increase in iNOS expression and at the least 1.6-fold increase in CYBB expression, compared with the other treatment groups. The CYBB expression was significantly downregulated in the HSc group, compared with the TNi and HSi groups.

Discussion

Eimeria maxima infection and HS affects growth and feed intake

Meat-type (broiler) chickens consume a large amount of feed thereby increasing the internal heat load produced by digestion and metabolism. Under HS, broilers reduce the feed intake to minimize internal heat production. In the current study, exposing chickens to HS significantly increased cloacal temperature indicating the effectiveness of heat treatment (Fig 1) [31, 32]. Expectedly, the growth and feed intake were markedly impacted by HS, E. maxima, and their combination. The largest growth depressions were observed in the infected groups at 6 and 7 dpi. However, at 14 dpi, the HS groups suffered the largest growth depression. Interestingly, the HSi group showed faster growth recovery from E. maxima impact than the TNi group suggesting that the E. maxima effect on growth may be transient while the HS has the most persistent impact. The HSi group also showed better feed conversion than the TNi group (Fig 2C). Taken together, the data from the current study suggests that, even though the effect of HS on performance of broiler chickens may linger longer than that of E. maxima infection, HS may also curtail the adverse effect of E. maxima infection on performance.
Fig 6. The mRNA expression of the ileal peptide transporters. The mRNA fold expression of the ileal peptide transporters at 6 dpi of chickens infected with E. maxima and their uninfected controls that are raised in a thermoneutral or heat stress environment: TNc = thermoneutral control, TNi = thermoneutral infected, HSc = heat stress control, HSi = heat stress infected. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.
Fig 6. The mRNA expression of the ileal peptide transporters. The mRNA fold expression of the ileal peptide transporters at 6 dpi of chickens infected with E. maxima and their uninfected controls that are raised in a thermoneutral or heat stress environment: TNc = thermoneutral control, TNi = thermoneutral infected, HSc = heat stress control, HSi = heat stress infected. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.

Eimeria maxima infection and heat stress affect nutrient digestibility

Eimeria parasites invade and destroy the intestinal epithelium causing a severe reduction in nutrient digestibility [20, 22]. On the other hand, HS was found to induce intestinal leakage [32], Therefore, it was expected that the combined effects of HS and E. maxima infection will significantly destroy the intestinal epithelium and impair digestibility. In the current study, the AID for crude protein and crude fat were reduced in the TNi group. However, it seems that the infected birds that were reared under HS had a slight reduction in AID for crude fat and no reduction in AID of crude protein (Fig 3). The expected negative effects of E. maxima on AID were modulated by the HS. Schneiders et al. [33] showed that HS limits the reproductive ability of E. maxima. The heat treatment may have interfered with the development of E. maxima thereby limiting its ability to affect ileum digestibility.

Eimeria maxima infection and heat stress affect nutrient transporters

Hexose transporters. The absorption of simple sugars in the intestine is essential for energy balance and body glucose homeostasis [34]. Monosaccharides are transported through a group of active and passive transports. SGLT1 is an active Na+ /glucose symporter that is mainly expressed on the enterocytic apical membrane and utilizes the concentration gradient of the Na+ to transport the glucose against its concentration whereas GLUT1, 2, 5, 8, 10, and 12 are facilitative sugar transporters that allow the movement of sugars along their concentration gradient and have different sugar-binding affinity and insulin sensitivity [12, 14]. The expression of both SGLT1 and GLUT2 transporters was significantly reduced in the infected groups, compared with the TNc group (Fig 4). Similar results were observed in the enterocytes of nematode infected mice in which the activated M2 macrophages inhibited the SGLT1 activity without downregulation. The SGLT1 inactivation, accompanied by the GLUT2 downregulation, resulted in compensatory upregulation of GLUT1 as suggested by Notari et al. [35]. Similarly, we observed an upregulation of GLUT1 in the TNi group compared with other treatment groups which is in concordance with the report by Notari et al. [35] and Teng et al. [36]. Furthermore, SGLT1 inactivation and GLUT2 downregulation were also observed in the enterocytes of rats exposed to different physical stressors [37, 38], and in the jejunum of broiler chicken exposed to HS [39]. The immigrated macrophages and lymphocytes into E. maxima infected sites are mainly expressing GLUT1 that may also contribute to the observed upregulation of GLUT1 in the ileal tissue of the TNi birds, compared with the other treatment groups (Fig 4) [40, 41].
Fig 7. The mRNA expression of the ileal villus absorptive enterocytes’ marker genes. The mRNA fold expression of marker genes specific for ileal villus absorptive enterocytes at 6 dpi of chickens infected with E. maxima and their uninfected controls that are raised in a thermoneutral or heat stress environment: TNc = thermoneutral control, TNi = thermoneutral infected, HSc = heat stress control, HSi = heat stress infected. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.
Fig 7. The mRNA expression of the ileal villus absorptive enterocytes’ marker genes. The mRNA fold expression of marker genes specific for ileal villus absorptive enterocytes at 6 dpi of chickens infected with E. maxima and their uninfected controls that are raised in a thermoneutral or heat stress environment: TNc = thermoneutral control, TNi = thermoneutral infected, HSc = heat stress control, HSi = heat stress infected. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.
The downregulation of GLUT2 and GLUT5 transporters in the TNi group is in concordance with studies on E. maxima infected broiler chicken [42–44]. Heat stress was found to increase insulin secretion in humans [45], rats [46], ruminants [47], and chickens [48, 49]. Thus, the upregulation of the insulin-sensitive GLUT10 and GLUT12 transporters in the HSc group compared to the TNc group may be under the influence of insulin elevation [12]. Contrarily, the mRNA expression levels of the GLUT1, GLUT10, and GLUT12 were downregulated in the ileal tissue of heat-stressed laying hens [50]. The differences in these results could be due to the genetic differences between layers and meat-type chickens.
GLUT8 was downregulated in the infection groups relative to their uninfected controls. GLUT8 regulates enterocytic fructose transport in a negative correlation manner by modulating the abundance and membrane utilization of GLUT12 [51]. Coincidentally, GLUT8 was  downregulated while GLUT12 and GLUT5 were upregulated in the HSc group possibly to meet the energy demand. The independent expressions of SGLT1 and GLUT5 under HS were similar to the report of Habashy et al. (2017). In the current study, we show that HS modulates the mRNA expression of hexose transporters in the ileum of broiler chickens infected with E. maxima.
Fig 8. The ileal histopathology and morphological parameters. The histopathology picture: Photomicrograph of ileum tissue stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), at 100x magnification, of TNc (A), TNi (B), HSc (C), and HSi (D); the villus height (E); the crypt depth (F); the villus height to crypt depth ratio (G); at 6 dpi of chickens infected with E. maxima and their uninfected controls that are raised in thermoneutral or heat stress environment: TNc = thermoneutral control, TNi = thermoneutral infected, HSc = heat stress control, HSi = heat stress infected. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM. The ileum histological components were illustrated (A). The arrow heads point the E. maxima stages (B, D) gametocytes (black arrow heads) and schizonts (green arrowheads).
Fig 8. The ileal histopathology and morphological parameters. The histopathology picture: Photomicrograph of ileum tissue stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), at 100x magnification, of TNc (A), TNi (B), HSc (C), and HSi (D); the villus height (E); the crypt depth (F); the villus height to crypt depth ratio (G); at 6 dpi of chickens infected with E. maxima and their uninfected controls that are raised in thermoneutral or heat stress environment: TNc = thermoneutral control, TNi = thermoneutral infected, HSc = heat stress control, HSi = heat stress infected. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM. The ileum histological components were illustrated (A). The arrow heads point the E. maxima stages (B, D) gametocytes (black arrow heads) and schizonts (green arrowheads).
Fig 9. The mRNA expression of ileum tissue oxidative gene. The mRNA fold expression of ileum tissue oxidative genes iNOS (A) and CYBB (B) at 6 dpi of chickens infected with E. maxima and their uninfected controls that are raised in a thermoneutral or heat stress environment: TNc = thermoneutral control, TNi = thermoneutral infected, HSc = heat stress control, HSi = heat stress infected. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.
Fig 9. The mRNA expression of ileum tissue oxidative gene. The mRNA fold expression of ileum tissue oxidative genes iNOS (A) and CYBB (B) at 6 dpi of chickens infected with E. maxima and their uninfected controls that are raised in a thermoneutral or heat stress environment: TNc = thermoneutral control, TNi = thermoneutral infected, HSc = heat stress control, HSi = heat stress infected. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were depicted by different letters. The error bars represent the SEM.
Fatty acid transporters. The majority of dietary lipids are absorbed along the intestine through a group of fatty acid transporters and binding proteins [52]. Therefore, the enterocyte contains a FABP-rich cytosol: the liver-type FABP (FABP1) was first identified in the liver and later on was found to be abundantly expressed in the intestine, the intestinal-type FABP (FABP2) was found exclusively present in the enterocytes [53], and the ileal lipid or bile-acid binding protein (FABP6) has a higher affinity to bind bile acids than lipids [54]. The HSc group showed upregulation of FABP1 that was similarly reported in response to immune stress [55], chronic heat stress [11], and corticosteroid administration [56] in broiler chickens, as well as rats under corticosteroid treatment [57]. The role of cortisol in upregulating the expression of FATP1 was possibly due to the interaction of FATP1 with the cytoplasmic steroid hormone receptor HNF4α that acts as a transcriptional factor regulating different cellular functions, including the genes associated with inflammation and oxidative stress in liver and intestine [58–60]. We can hypothesize that the upregulation of FABP1 under HS is essential to mitigate the oxidative stress effect through regulating lipid signaling and phospholipid incorporation. It was found that the incorporation of phospholipids into cells was increased by the presence of FABP1 [61–63]. The observed upregulation of the FABP6 expression in the HS groups (control and infected) compared with TN groups (control and infected), respectively, could be explained by the enterocytes increasing transportation capacity to reabsorb the bile acids over-secretion induced by plasma hydrocortisone level [64–66]. Regarding the mucosal injury caused by the E. maxima infection, the downregulation of FABPs was a plausible outcome (Fig 5). However, the expression levels of FABP1 and FABP6 in the HSi group were significantly higher than the TNi group suggesting that ileum epithelial damage in the TNi was substantial compared to that of the HSi group. Unlike FABPs, FATP1 is only expressed on the membrane and not in the cytoplasm. FATP1 is the primary candidate for absorbing long chain fatty acids (LCFA) and is believed to facilitate the bidirectional movement of LCFA across the plasma membrane [67]. Since the HSi group had the lowest feed intake 7 dpi (Fig 5), it is possible that the enterocyte downregulated the FATP1 expression to the level only required for absorption.
Peptide transporters. Digestible protein is broken down and hydrolyzed along the gut releasing small peptides and free amino acids that are absorbed through the intestinal mucosa [68]. Oligopeptide transporters of the SLC15A1 family, including PEPT1, PEPT2, and PHT1, are responsible for proton-coupled active transporting of di- and tripeptides and expressed on the apical membrane of the enterocytes as well as various types of body cells [19, 69]. The upregulation of PEPT1 and PEPT2 expression in HS groups (infected and control) compared with the TN groups (infected and control), respectively (Fig 6), may be under glucocorticoid influence through the stress-related serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1 (SKG1) [70–72]. Similarly, PEPT1 upregulation was observed in the small intestine of the corticosteroid-treated broiler chicken [56]. In other studies, the jejunum expression of PEPT1 was downregulated in broiler chickens challenged with mixed Eimeria spp (acervulina, praecox, maxima, mitis) [73], and under experimentally developed necrotic enteritis [74]. While the PEPT1 was upregulated in the broiler ileal tissue, PEPT2 was downregulated after 12 days of continuous heat stress [11]. The PHT1 transporter is abundantly expressed on the endosomal and lysosomal membranes as well as the enterocytic membrane [75–77]. PHT1 was downregulated in the HSi group compared to the HSc group (Fig 6), maybe due to the combination of E. maxima with HS reduced the endosome abundance or function [78]. The cellular autophagy and endosome/lysosome responses under physical and infectious stresses require further investigation.

Heat stress limits the E. maxima-induced villus enterocytic damage

Since the AID and mRNA expression of most ileal nutrient transporters were significantly improved in the HSi group compared with the TNi group, we suggest that HS may limit E. maxima’s ability to cause enterocytic damage. This hypothesis was further investigated using the expression levels of ACSL5, IAP, and SGLT1 that are considered molecular markers for the villus absorptive enterocytes [26, 79]. The SGLT1, ACSL5, and IAP expression levels were significantly higher in the HSi group than the TNi group (Figs 4 and 7). This suggests that either HS boosts the enterocytic function and gene expression and/or prevents the E. maximainduced enterocytic destruction. The histopathology of the ileum tissues was examined to identify the ileal tissue damage in the four treatment groups (Fig 8). The intestinal morphology undergoes architectural changes including villi shortening and crypt deepening under conditions such as toxins, infection, and heat stress [80–82]. Similarly, the histological examination showed villus height reduction in all treatment groups (TNi, HSc, and HSi), compared with the TNc group. However, only the TNi group showed crypt hyperplasia, compared with TNc group (Fig 8A–8D). Interestingly, the TNi group showed a significantly shorter villus, deeper crypts, and smaller villus:crypt ratio than the HSi group suggesting that HS limited the ileum tissue damage caused by E. maxima (Fig 8E–8G).

Ileum expression levels of oxidative genes

The two major causes of the Eimeria-induced villus enterocytic damage are the parasite invasion and replication, and the oxidative radicals produced from macrophages and heterophils during the immune response. It has been reported that HS curtails the E. maxima life cycle and inhibits its gametogony [33]. The ileum tissue expression of the oxidative genes iNOS and CYBB were assessed to investigate the other cause of the enterocytic damage. Activated chicken macrophages and heterophils express iNOS and CYBB genes that are responsible for nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide production, respectively [83–85]. The significant upregulation of both iNOS and CYBB genes in the TNi group, compared with the HSi group, suggests a higher tissue production of oxidative radicals (•NO and H2O2). It is therefore plausible that reactive oxygen species contributed to the tissue deterioration detected mostly in the TNi group. We expected HS to exacerbate the effects of E. maxima infections in broiler chickens, however, the results of the current study strongly suggest that HS rather curtailed the negative impact of E. maxima on ileum function and tissue morphology by putatively suppressing the oxidative damage of the enterocytes.

Conclusion

The current study demonstrates that HS and E. maxima infection, either individually or combined, impact growth and feed intake of broiler chickens. Even though E. maxima and HS are independent stressors in broiler chickens, their combined effects are not synergistic. It appears that HS curtailed the effects of the E. maxima infection resulting in the outcomes of apparent digestibility and mRNA expression of nutrient transporters of the infected chickens reared under heat stress to be similar to their uninfected counterparts reared under heat stress. Exposing the E. maxima infected broiler chickens to HS curtailed the ileum tissue injury and suppressed the immune-induced oxidative damage to the enterocytes. Further molecular mechanistic studies are recommended to identify the key cellular and molecular events associated with the HS effect on the E. maxima life cycle inside the broiler chicken’s intestine.
    
This article was originally published in PLoS ONE 17(6): e0269131. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269131. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.

1. Allen PC, Fetterer R. Recent advances in biology and immunobiology of Eimeria species and in diagnosis and control of infection with these coccidian parasites of poultry. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2002; 15(1):58–65. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.15.1.58-65.2002 PMID: 11781266

2. McDougald LR. Intestinal protozoa important to poultry. Poultry science. 1998; 77(8):1156–8. https:// doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.8.1156 PMID: 9706082

3. Levine ND. Protozoan parasites of domestic animals and of man. Protozoan Parasites of Domestic Animals and of Man. 1961.

4. Dubey J, Jenkins M. Re-evaluation of the life cycle of Eimeria maxima Tyzzer, 1929 in chickens (Gallus domesticus). Parasitology. 2018; 145(8):1051–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182017002153 PMID: 29239290

5. Zulpo DL, Peretti J, Ono LM, Longhi E, Oliveira MR, Guimarães IG, et al. Pathogenicity and histopathological observations of commercial broiler chicks experimentally infected with isolates of Eimeria tenella, E. acervulina and E. maxima. Semina: Ciências Agra´rias. 2007; 28(1):97–104.

6. Ducatelle R, Goossens E, De Meyer F, Eeckhaut V, Antonissen G, Haesebrouck F, et al. Biomarkers for monitoring intestinal health in poultry: present status and future perspectives. Vet Res. 2018; 49 (1):43. Epub 2018/05/10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-018-0538-6 PMID: 29739469; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5941335.

7. Allen PC, Jenkins MC, Miska KB. Cross protection studies with Eimeria maxima strains. Parasitol Res. 2005; 97(3):179–85. Epub 2005/07/02. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-005-1423-6 PMID: 15991044.

8. Sharman PA, Smith NC, Wallach MG, Katrib M. Chasing the golden egg: vaccination against poultry coccidiosis. Parasite Immunol. 2010; 32(8):590–8. Epub 2010/07/16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 3024.2010.01209.x PMID: 20626814.

9. Attia Y, Hassan R, Tag El-Din A, Abou-Shehema B. Effect of ascorbic acid or increasing metabolizable energy level with or without supplementation of some essential amino acids on productive and physiological traits of slow-growing chicks exposed to chronic heat stress. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition. 2011; 95(6):744–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01104.x PMID: 21158953

10. Habashy W, Milfort M, Adomako K, Attia Y, Rekaya R, Aggrey S. Effect of heat stress on amino acid digestibility and transporters in meat-type chickens. Poultry science. 2017; 96(7):2312–9. https://doi. org/10.3382/ps/pex027 PMID: 28339933

11. Habashy WS, Milfort MC, Fuller AL, Attia YA, Rekaya R, Aggrey SE. Effect of heat stress on protein utilization and nutrient transporters in meat-type chickens. Int J Biometeorol. 2017; 61(12):2111–8. Epub 2017/08/12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-017-1414-1 PMID: 28799035.

12. Byers MS, Howard C, Wang X. Avian and Mammalian Facilitative Glucose Transporters. Microarrays (Basel). 2017; 6(2). Epub 2017/04/06. https://doi.org/10.3390/microarrays6020007 PMID: 28379195; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5487954.

13. Kono T, Nishida M, Nishiki Y, Seki Y, Sato K, Akiba Y. Characterisation of glucose transporter (GLUT) gene expression in broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci. 2005; 46(4):510–5. Epub 2005/11/05. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00071660500181289 PMID: 16268111.

14. Augustin R, Mayoux E. Mammalian sugar transporters. Glucose homeostasis: IntechOpen; 2014.

15. Romero A, Gomez O, Terrado J, Mesonero JE. Expression of GLUT8 in mouse intestine: identification of alternative spliced variants. Journal of cellular biochemistry. 2009; 106(6):1068–78. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/jcb.22090 PMID: 19229868

16. Smathers RL, Petersen DR. The human fatty acid-binding protein family: evolutionary divergences and functions. Human genomics. 2011; 5(3):170. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-7364-5-3-170 PMID: 21504868

17. Yuan J, Zhang B, Guo Y. Poultry fat decreased fatty acid transporter protein mRNA expression and affected fatty acid composition in chickens. Journal of animal science and biotechnology. 2012; 3(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-1891-3-17 PMID: 22958585

18. Zwarycz B, Wong EA. Expression of the peptide transporters PepT1, PepT2, and PHT1 in the embryonic and posthatch chick. Poult Sci. 2013; 92(5):1314–21. Epub 2013/04/11. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps. 2012-02826 PMID: 23571341.

19. Chen H, Wong EA, Webb KE Jr. Tissue distribution of a peptide transporter mRNA in sheep, dairy cows, pigs, and chickens. J Anim Sci. 1999; 77(5):1277–83. Epub 1999/05/26. https://doi.org/10.2527/ 1999.7751277x PMID: 10340597.

20. Adedokun SA, Helmbrecht A, Applegate TJ. Investigation of the effect of coccidial vaccine challenge on apparent and standardized ileal amino acid digestibility in grower and finisher broilers and its evaluation in 21-day-old broilers. Poult Sci. 2016; 95(8):1825–35. Epub 2016/03/10. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/ pew066 PMID: 26957634.

21. Guo S, Liu D, Zhao X, Li C, Guo Y. Xylanase supplementation of a wheat-based diet improved nutrient digestion and mRNA expression of intestinal nutrient transporters in broiler chickens infected with Clostridium perfringens. Poult Sci. 2014; 93(1):94–103. Epub 2014/02/27. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013- 03188 PMID: 24570428.

22. Teng PY, Fuller AL, Kim WK. Evaluation of nitro compounds as feed additives in diets of Eimeria-challenged broilers in vitro and in vivo. Poult Sci. 2020; 99(3):1320–5. Epub 2020/03/01. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.psj.2019.11.026 PMID: 32111308.

23. Rossi Sebastiano M, Konstantinidou G. Targeting Long Chain Acyl-CoA Synthetases for Cancer Therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(15). Epub 2019/07/28. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20153624 PMID: 31344914; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6696099.

24. Bilski J, Mazur-Bialy A, Wojcik D, Zahradnik-Bilska J, Brzozowski B, Magierowski M, et al. The Role of Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase in Inflammatory Disorders of Gastrointestinal Tract. Mediators Inflamm. 2017; 2017:9074601. Epub 2017/03/21. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9074601 PMID: 28316376; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5339520.

25. Sabino-Silva R, Mori RC, David-Silva A, Okamoto MM, Freitas HS, Machado UF. The Na(+)/glucose cotransporters: from genes to therapy. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2010; 43(11):1019–26. Epub 2010/11/05. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-879x2010007500115 PMID: 21049241.

26. Gassler N, Newrzella D, Bohm C, Lyer S, Li L, Sorgenfrei O, et al. Molecular characterisation of nonabsorptive and absorptive enterocytes in human small intestine. Gut. 2006; 55(8):1084–9. Epub 2006/ 03/25. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2005.073262 PMID: 16556670; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1856251.

27. Schneiders G, Foutz J, Milfort M, Ghareeb A, Sorhue U, Richter J, et al. Ontogeny of intestinal permeability in chickens infected with Eimeria maxima: implications for intestinal health. 2019; 6(3):41–50.

28. Horowitz W, Latimer GJG, Md. AOAC International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 2006;18.

29. Edwards H Jr, Gillis M. A chromic oxide balance method for determining phosphate availability. Poultry Science. 1959; 38(3):569–74.

30. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. methods. 2001; 25(4):402–8. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262 PMID: 11846609

31. Al-Zghoul MB, Alliftawi ARS, Saleh KMM, Jaradat ZW. Expression of digestive enzyme and intestinal transporter genes during chronic heat stress in the thermally manipulated broiler chicken. Poult Sci. 2019; 98(9):4113–22. Epub 2019/05/09. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez249 PMID: 31065718.

32. Ruff J, Barros TL, Tellez G Jr., Blankenship J, Lester H, Graham BD, et al. Research Note: Evaluation of a heat stress model to induce gastrointestinal leakage in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2020; 99 (3):1687–92. Epub 2020/03/03. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.075 PMID: 32115037.

33. Schneiders GH, Foutz JC, Milfort MC, Ghareeb AFA, Fuller AL, Rekaya R, et al. Heat stress reduces sexual development and affects pathogenesis of Eimeria maxima in meat-type chickens. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):10736. Epub 2020/07/03. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67330-w PMID: 32612102; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7329875.

34. Dyer J, Vayro S, King TP, Shirazi-Beechey SP. Glucose sensing in the intestinal epithelium. Eur J Biochem. 2003; 270(16):3377–88. Epub 2003/08/06. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03721.x PMID: 12899695.

35. Notari L, Riera DC, Sun R, Bohl JA, McLean LP, Madden KB, et al. Role of macrophages in the altered epithelial function during a type 2 immune response induced by enteric nematode infection. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e84763. Epub 2014/01/28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084763 PMID: 24465430; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3900397.

36. Teng PY, Choi J, Tompkins Y, Lillehoj H, Kim W. Impacts of increasing challenge with Eimeria maxima on the growth performance and gene expression of biomarkers associated with intestinal integrity and nutrient transporters. Vet Res. 2021; 52(1):81. Epub 2021/06/11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-021- 00949-3 PMID: 34108017; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8190994.

37. Shepherd EJ, Helliwell PA, Mace OJ, Morgan EL, Patel N, Kellett GL. Stress and glucocorticoid inhibit apical GLUT2-trafficking and intestinal glucose absorption in rat small intestine. J Physiol. 2004; 560(Pt 1):281–90. Epub 2004/08/07. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2004.072447 PMID: 15297580; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1665211.

38. Boudry G, Cheeseman CI, Perdue MH. Psychological stress impairs Na+-dependent glucose absorption and increases GLUT2 expression in the rat jejunal brush-border membrane. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007; 292(2):R862–7. Epub 2006/10/21. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00655. 2006 PMID: 17053095.

39. Sun X, Zhang H, Sheikhahmadi A, Wang Y, Jiao H, Lin H, et al. Effects of heat stress on the gene expression of nutrient transporters in the jejunum of broiler chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Int J Biometeorol. 2015; 59(2):127–35. Epub 2014/04/17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-014-0829-1 PMID: 24736810.

40. Smith-Garvin JE, Koretzky GA, Jordan MS. T cell activation. Annual review of immunology. 2009; 27:591–619. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132706 PMID: 19132916

41. Freemerman AJ, Johnson AR, Sacks GN, Milner JJ, Kirk EL, Troester MA, et al. Metabolic reprogramming of macrophages: glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1)-mediated glucose metabolism drives a proinflammatory phenotype. J Biol Chem. 2014; 289(11):7884–96. Epub 2014/02/05. https://doi.org/10. 1074/jbc.M113.522037 PMID: 24492615; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3953299.

42. Su S, Miska K, Fetterer R, Jenkins M, Wong E. Expression of digestive enzymes and nutrient transporters in Eimeria-challenged broilers. Experimental parasitology. 2015; 150:13–21. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.exppara.2015.01.003 PMID: 25617757

43. Su S, Miska KB, Fetterer RH, Jenkins MC, Lamont SJ, Wong EA. Differential expression of intestinal nutrient transporters and host defense peptides in Eimeria maxima-infected Fayoumi and Ross chickens. Poult Sci. 2018; 97(12):4392–400. Epub 2018/07/15. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey286 PMID: 30007365.

44. Miska KB, Fetterer RH. The mRNA expression of amino acid and sugar transporters, aminopeptidase, as well as the di- and tri-peptide transporter PepT1 in the intestines of Eimeria infected broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2017; 96(2):465–73. Epub 2016/09/04. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew303 PMID: 27591271.

45. Nowotny B, Cavka M, Herder C, Loffler H, Poschen U, Joksimovic L, et al. Effects of acute psychological stress on glucose metabolism and subclinical inflammation in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder. Horm Metab Res. 2010; 42(10):746–53. Epub 2010/07/29. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030- 1261924 PMID: 20665427.

46. Rostamkhani F, Zardooz H, Zahediasl S, Farrokhi B. Comparison of the effects of acute and chronic psychological stress on metabolic features in rats. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2012; 13(11):904–12. Epub 2012/11/06. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1100383 PMID: 23125083; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3494029.

47. Baumgard LH, Rhoads RP Jr., Effects of heat stress on postabsorptive metabolism and energetics. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2013; 1:311–37. Epub 2013/01/01. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal031412-103644 PMID: 25387022.

48. Lin H, Du R, Gu X, Li F, Zhang Z. A study on the plasma biochemical indices of heat-stressed broilers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2000; 13(9):1210–8.

49. Lu Z, He XF, Ma BB, Zhang L, Li JL, Jiang Y, et al. Increased fat synthesis and limited apolipoprotein B cause lipid accumulation in the liver of broiler chickens exposed to chronic heat stress. Poult Sci. 2019; 98(9):3695–704. Epub 2019/02/28. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez056 PMID: 30809677.

50. Orhan C, Tuzcu M, Deeh PBD, Sahin N, Komorowski JR, Sahin K. Organic Chromium Form Alleviates the Detrimental Effects of Heat Stress on Nutrient Digestibility and Nutrient Transporters in Laying Hens. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019; 189(2):529–37. Epub 2018/08/23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011- 018-1485-9 PMID: 30132119.

51. DeBosch BJ, Chi M, Moley KH. Glucose transporter 8 (GLUT8) regulates enterocyte fructose transport and global mammalian fructose utilization. Endocrinology. 2012; 153(9):4181–91. Epub 2012/07/24. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2012-1541 PMID: 22822162; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3423610.

52. Caspary WF. Physiology and pathophysiology of intestinal absorption. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992; 55(1 Suppl):299S–308S. Epub 1992/01/01. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/55.1.299s PMID: 1728844

53. Storch J, Corsico B. The emerging functions and mechanisms of mammalian fatty acid-binding proteins. Annu Rev Nutr. 2008; 28:73–95. Epub 2008/04/26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.27.061406. 093710 PMID: 18435590.

54. Zimmerman AW, van Moerkerk HT, Veerkamp JH. Ligand specificity and conformational stability of human fatty acid-binding proteins. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2001; 33(9):865–76. Epub 2001/07/20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1357-2725(01)00070-x PMID: 11461829.

55. Feng Y, Yang XJ, Wang YB, Li WL, Liu Y, Yin RQ, et al. Effects of immune stress on performance parameters, intestinal enzyme activity and mRNA expression of intestinal transporters in broiler chickens. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2012; 25(5):701–7. Epub 2012/05/01. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas. 2011.11377 PMID: 25049616; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4093104.

56. Hu XF, Guo YM, Huang BY, Bun S, Zhang LB, Li JH, et al. The effect of glucagon-like peptide 2 injection on performance, small intestinal morphology, and nutrient transporter expression of stressed broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2010; 89(9):1967–74. Epub 2010/08/17. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00547 PMID: 20709983.

57. Thiesen A, Wild GE, Keelan M, Clandinin MT, Thomson AB. Locally and systemically active glucocorticosteroids modify intestinal absorption of sugars in rats. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003; 94(2):583–90. Epub 2002/10/23. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00134.2002 PMID: 12391102.

58. Babeu JP, Boudreau F. Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4-alpha involvement in liver and intestinal inflammatory networks. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(1):22–30. Epub 2014/01/15. https://doi.org/10.3748/ wjg.v20.i1.22 PMID: 24415854; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3886012.

59. Hostetler HA, McIntosh AL, Atshaves BP, Storey SM, Payne HR, Kier AB, et al. L-FABP directly interacts with PPARα in cultured primary hepatocytes. Journal of lipid research. 2009; 50(8):1663–75. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M900058-JLR200 PMID: 19289416

60. McIntosh AL, Petrescu AD, Hostetler HA, Kier AB, Schroeder F. Liver-type fatty acid binding protein interacts with hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α. FEBS letters. 2013; 587(23):3787–91. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.febslet.2013.09.043 PMID: 24140341

61. Prows DR, Murphy EJ, Schroeder F. Intestinal and liver fatty acid binding proteins differentially affect fatty acid uptake and esterification in L-cells. Lipids. 1995; 30(10):907–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF02537481 PMID: 8538377

62. Lagakos WS, Gajda AM, Agellon L, Binas B, Choi V, Mandap B, et al. Different functions of intestinal and liver-type fatty acid-binding proteins in intestine and in whole body energy homeostasis. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2011; 300(5):G803–G14. https://doi.org/ 10.1152/ajpgi.00229.2010 PMID: 21350192

63. Gajda AM, Zhou YX, Agellon LB, Fried SK, Kodukula S, Fortson W, et al. Direct comparison of mice null for liver or intestinal fatty acid-binding proteins reveals highly divergent phenotypic responses to high fat feeding. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2013; 288(42):30330–44. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113. 501676 PMID: 23990461

64. Brems JJ, Reese J, Kane R 3rd, Kaminski DL. Effect of cyclosporine and steroids on canine bile flow. Hepatology. 1991; 14(3):523–7. Epub 1991/09/01. PMID: 1874497.

65. Alvaro D, Gigliozzi A, Marucci L, Alpini G, Barbaro B, Monterubbianesi R, et al. Corticosteroids modulate the secretory processes of the rat intrahepatic biliary epithelium. Gastroenterology. 2002; 122 (4):1058–69. Epub 2002/03/23. https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2002.32374 PMID: 11910357.

66. Xu Y, Lai X, Li Z, Zhang X, Luo Q. Effect of chronic heat stress on some physiological and immunological parameters in different breed of broilers. Poult Sci. 2018; 97(11):4073–82. Epub 2018/06/23. https:// doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey256 PMID: 29931080; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6162357.

67. Schaffer JE, Lodish HF. Molecular mechanism of long-chain fatty acid uptake. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 1995; 5(6):218–24. Epub 1995/11/01. https://doi.org/10.1016/1050-1738(95)00102-6 PMID: 21232263.

68. McKee T, McKee J. Biochemistry: The molecular basis of life. 5th: New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.

69. Smith DE, Clemencon B, Hediger MA. Proton-coupled oligopeptide transporter family SLC15: physiological, pharmacological and pathological implications. Mol Aspects Med. 2013; 34(2–3):323–36. Epub 2013/03/20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2012.11.003 PMID: 23506874; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3602806.

70. Lang F, Bohmer C, Palmada M, Seebohm G, Strutz-Seebohm N, Vallon V. (Patho)physiological significance of the serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase isoforms. Physiol Rev. 2006; 86(4):1151–78. Epub 2006/10/04. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00050.2005 PMID: 17015487.

71. Rexhepaj R, Rotte A, Kempe DS, Sopjani M, Foller M, Gehring EM, et al. Stimulation of electrogenic intestinal dipeptide transport by the glucocorticoid dexamethasone. Pflugers Arch. 2009; 459(1):191– 202. Epub 2009/08/13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-009-0701-z PMID: 19672619.

72. Boehmer C, Palmada M, Klaus F, Jeyaraj S, Lindner R, Laufer J, et al. The peptide transporter PEPT2 is targeted by the protein kinase SGK1 and the scaffold protein NHERF2. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2008; 22(5–6):705–14. Epub 2008/12/18. https://doi.org/10.1159/000185554 PMID: 19088452.

73. Khatlab AS, Del Vesco AP, de Oliveira Neto AR, Fernandes RPM, Gasparino E. Dietary supplementation with free methionine or methionine dipeptide mitigates intestinal oxidative stress induced by Eimeria spp. challenge in broiler chickens. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019; 10:58. Epub 2019/07/13. https://doi. org/10.1186/s40104-019-0353-6 PMID: 31297194; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6598363.

74. Emami NK, Calik A, White MB, Young M, Dalloul RA. Necrotic Enteritis in Broiler Chickens: The Role of Tight Junctions and Mucosal Immune Responses in Alleviating the Effect of the Disease. Microorganisms. 2019; 7(8). Epub 2019/08/03. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7080231 PMID: 31370350; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6723922.

75. Nakamura N, Lill JR, Phung Q, Jiang Z, Bakalarski C, de Maziere A, et al. Endosomes are specialized platforms for bacterial sensing and NOD2 signalling. Nature. 2014; 509(7499):240–4. Epub 2014/04/ 04. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13133 PMID: 24695226.

76. Sun D, Wang Y, Tan F, Fang D, Hu Y, Smith DE, et al. Functional and molecular expression of the proton-coupled oligopeptide transporters in spleen and macrophages from mouse and human. Mol Pharm. 2013; 10(4):1409–16. Epub 2013/02/28. https://doi.org/10.1021/mp300700p PMID: 23442152; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3633525.

77. Broer S, Broer A. Amino acid homeostasis and signalling in mammalian cells and organisms. Biochem J. 2017; 474(12):1935–63. Epub 2017/05/27. https://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20160822 PMID: 28546457; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5444488.

78. Trivedi PC, Bartlett JJ, Pulinilkunnil T. Lysosomal Biology and Function: Modern View of Cellular Debris Bin. Cells. 2020; 9(5). Epub 2020/05/08. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9051131 PMID: 32375321; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7290337.

79. Wang X, Zou W, Yu H, Lin Y, Dai G, Zhang T, et al. RNA Sequencing Analysis of Chicken Cecum Tissues Following Eimeria tenella Infection in Vivo. Genes (Basel). 2019; 10(6). Epub 2019/06/05. https:// doi.org/10.3390/genes10060420 PMID: 31159150; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6627390.

80. Giannenas I, Tsalie E, Triantafillou E, Hessenberger S, Teichmann K, Mohnl M, et al. Assessment of probiotics supplementation via feed or water on the growth performance, intestinal morphology and microflora of chickens after experimental infection with Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria maxima and Eimeria tenella. Avian Pathol. 2014; 43(3):209–16. Epub 2014/03/08. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2014. 899430 PMID: 24601749.

81. Ozdogan M, Topal E, Paksuz EP, Kirkan S. Effect of different levels of crude glycerol on the morphology and some pathogenic bacteria of the small intestine in male broilers. Animal. 2014; 8(1):36–42. Epub 2013/11/02. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113001833 PMID: 24176107.

82. Santos RR, Awati A, Roubos-van den Hil PJ, Tersteeg-Zijderveld MH, Koolmees PA, Fink-Gremmels J. Quantitative histo-morphometric analysis of heat-stress-related damage in the small intestines of broiler chickens. Avian Pathol. 2015; 44(1):19–22. Epub 2014/11/21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2014. 988122 PMID: 25410755.

83. Lillehoj HS, Li G. Nitric oxide production by macrophages stimulated with Coccidia sporozoites, lipopolysaccharide, or interferon-gamma, and its dynamic changes in SC and TK strains of chickens infected with Eimeria tenella. Avian Dis. 2004; 48(2):244–53. Epub 2004/07/31. https://doi.org/10.1637/7054 PMID: 15283411.

84. Rehman ZU, Meng C, Sun Y, Safdar A, Pasha RH, Munir M, et al. Oxidative Stress in Poultry: Lessons from the Viral Infections. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018; 2018:5123147. Epub 2019/01/17. https://doi.org/ 10.1155/2018/5123147 PMID: 30647810; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6311761.

85. Panday A, Sahoo MK, Osorio D, Batra S. NADPH oxidases: an overview from structure to innate immunity-associated pathologies. Cell Mol Immunol. 2015; 12(1):5–23. Epub 2014/09/30. https://doi.org/10. 1038/cmi.2014.89 PMID: 25263488; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4654378.

Related topics:
Related Questions

Heat stress was found to increase insulin secretion in humans, rats, ruminants, and chickens. The upregulation of the insulin-sensitive GLUT10 and GLUT12 transporters in the HSc group compared to the TNc group may be under the influence of insulin elevation. In contrast, the mRNA expression levels of the GLUT1, GLUT10, and GLUT12 were downregulated in the ileal tissue of heat-stressed laying hens.

In the current study, we show that heat stress modulates the mRNA expression of hexose transporters in the ileum of broiler chickens infected with E. maxima. GLUT8 was downregulated in the infection groups relative to their uninfected controls, while GLUT12 and GLUT5 were upregulated in the HSc group possibly to meet the energy demand. The independent expressions of SGLT1 and GLUT5 under heat stress were observed.

Since the AID and mRNA expression of most ileal nutrient transporters were significantly improved in the HSi group compared with the TNi group, we suggest that HS may limit E. maxima’s ability to cause enterocytic damage. This hypothesis was further investigated using the expression levels of ACSL5, IAP, and SGLT1 that are considered molecular markers for the villus absorptive enterocytes [26, 79]. The SGLT1, ACSL5, and IAP expression levels were significantly higher in the HSi group than the TNi group (Figs 4 and 7).

The significant upregulation of both iNOS and CYBB genes in the TNi group, compared with the HSi group, suggests a higher tissue production of oxidative radicals (•NO and H2O2). It is therefore plausible that reactive oxygen species contributed to the tissue deterioration detected mostly in the TNi group.
Authors:
Gustavo Schneiders
Jennifer Richter
University of Georgia
University of Georgia
James Foutz
Marie Milfort
University of Georgia
University of Georgia
Romdhane Rekaya
University of Georgia
University of Georgia
Samuel Aggrey
University of Georgia
University of Georgia
Show more
Recommend
Comment
Share
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Poultry Industry
Manuel Da Costa
Manuel Da Costa
Cargill
United States
Shivaram Rao
Shivaram Rao
Pilgrim´s
PhD Director Principal de Nutrición y Servicios Técnicos de Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation
United States
Karen Christensen
Karen Christensen
Tyson
Tyson
PhD, senior director of animal welfare at Tyson Foods
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.