Explore
Communities in English
Advertise on Engormix

A view and overview on the control of avian influenza outbreaks in poultry: (5-6) Molecular approaches using avian cytokines and RNA-interference

Published: November 11, 2014
By: Sayed Abd El-Whab (The Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Friedrich Loeffler Institute – Institute of Molecular Virology and Cell Biology, Germany - National Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control on Poultry Production, Animal Health Research Institute, Egypt)
In previous articles we overviewed different approaches for control of avian influenza in poultry including culling of infected birds, vaccination, the use of chemotherapeutics and the use of herbal antivirals and probiotics. 
Avian Cytokines
Chicken cytokines such as chicken interferon-alpha (ChIFN-α), chicken interleukins (ChIL) and Toll-like receptors (TLR) are essential components of chicken’s innate immune system which play a vital role against virus infections [18, 24, 31, 36]. An innovative application of ChIFN-α to antagonize avian influenza virus (AIV) infection in poultry through direct oral feeding or drinking water has received more attention than other components [19, 21, 29, 33, 43]. Sekellick et al. [32] showed that up to 60% of investigated AIV population belonged to the highly pathogenic (HPAI) H5N9 subtype were highly sensitive to the inhibitory effects of ChIFN-α. Interestingly, both IFN-sensitive and -resistant clones were obtained after passage of the resistant clones in the presence of IFN which indicated that resistance to ChIFN-α was transient and did not result from stable genetic changes. Xia, et al. [46] cloned the ChIFN-α gene from three different chicken lines and studied their efficacy against H9N2 viruses in-ovo and in-vivo. Up to 70% of in-ovo treated chicken embryos were protected against H9N2 virus infection in dose dependent manner. Moreover, chickens received ChIFN-α by oculonasal inoculation at one day of age were protected from death upon H9N2 virus infection given 24 hours later. Findings of Meng and co-workers [21] showed that oral administration of exogenous ChIFN-α was effective to prevent and treat chickens experimentally infected with an H9N2 virus. It potentially reduced the viral load in trachea and resulted in rapid recovery of the body weight gain. In another study, White Leghorn (WL) chickens received ChIFN-α in drinking water for 14 successive days augmented detectable humoral anti-influenza antibodies after exposure to a low dose of an LPAIV H7N2 infection [19]. Thus, it has been suggested that regular water administration of ChIFN-α can create “super-sentinel” chickens to detect early infections with few amount of LPAIV [19]. Interestingly, ChIFN-α had antiviral activity against H1N1 and H5N9 viruses not only in chicken but also in duck and turkey primary cell cultures indicating a promising use in other avian species [14]. It has been recently found that ChIFN-α is more potent than the ChIFN-β to inactivate H9N2 virus in chicken fibroblast cell line (DF1) [26]. Recently, chIFN-λ demonstrated a remarkable inhibitory activity against HPAI H5N1, HPAI H7N7 and H9N2 viruses in ovo as well as in three to four-week-old chickens [30]. Intramuscular immunization of four-week-old specific-pathogen-free chickens with the melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 product (chMDA5) increased resistance of chickens to HPAIV H5N1 infection and reduced virus excretion [17].
Furthermore, oral administration of live attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium expressing ChIFN-α alone or in combination with ChIL-18 significantly reduced clinical signs induced by H9N2 virus and decreased the amount of virus load in cloacal swabs and internal organs [27, 28]. Likewise, chicken immunized with a recombinant fowl pox virus (rFPV) vaccine expressing both the HA gene of H9N2 virus and ChIL-18 survived challenge with an H9N2 virus and did not excrete any virus in swab samples and/or internal organs in comparison to non-vaccinated birds [6]. Also, rFPV expressing the H5, H7 and ChIL-18 genes produced significantly higher humoral and cellular mediated immune response and protected specific pathogen free chickens (SPF) and WL chickens against challenge with an HPAIV H5N1. Vaccinated birds had no virus shedding and showed significant increase in body weight gain [22]. So far, efficiency of avian-cytokines to limit AIV infection has not been adequately studied in other avian species. The duck IL-18 and IL-2 genes had been identified and shown to have 85% and 55% nucleotide identity to the chicken equivalents, respectively. Intramuscular inoculations of the duck IL-18 or IL-2 enhanced the humoral immune response of ducks vaccinated with H5N1 or H9N2 inactivated vaccines, respectively [5, 50]. Likewise, the recombinant goose IL-2 strengthens goose humoral immune responses after vaccination using H9N2 inactivated vaccine [49]. The TLR-3, TLR-7 and TLR9 are other promising chicken cytokines derivatives that showed broad-spectrum anti-influenza virus activity in-vitro and in-ovo [13, 34, 44, 45]. Recently, goose TLR7 was found to be identical to their mammalian counterpart and was triggered by H5N1 virus at the early stage of infection of geese [42].
The previous literatures have shown that avian cytokines are not affected by antigenic changes and they have broad spectrum antiviral activities. Nevertheless, the cost of mass production of chicken cytokines is still too high to be applied in large-scale in poultry industry [33]. Moreover, protein stability, host-specificity and labor associated with mass administration of chicken cytokines under field conditions require significant improvement [27]. 
4.2    RNA Interference (RNAi)
RNAi is a natural phenomenon used by many organisms as a defense mechanism against foreign microbial invasion, including viruses, that able to wreak potential genetic havoc of the susceptible host [35]. Short-interfering RNA (siRNA) is approximately 21–25 nucleotides specific for highly conserved regions of AIV genomes. It effectively mediates the catalytic degradation of complementary viral mRNAs and results in inhibition of a broad spectrum of influenza viruses replication in cell lines, chicken embryos and mice just before or after initiation of an infection [4, 9, 11, 12, 37, 51]. Tompkins and colleagues [40] found that siRNA specific for the NP or PA genes induced full protection of mice against lethal challenge with the HPAI H5N1 and H7N7 subtypes and markedly decreased virus titers in lungs. Likewise, prophylactic use of PA-specific siRNA molecule significantly reduced lung H5N1 virus titers and lethality in infected mice [47]. Moreover, siRNA targeting M2 or NP genes inhibited replication of H5N1 and H9N2 viruses in canine cell line and partially protected mice against HPAV H5N1 [48]. Recently, Jiao and colleagues designed and tested four siRNAs which were to able to inhibit the expression and accumulation of the NS1 protein of an HPAIV H5N1 in human embryonic kidney cell line [15].
In poultry, Li and others [16] showed that the siRNA targeting NP and/or PA genes inhibited protein expression, RNA transcription and multiplication of HPAIV H5N1 in chicken embryo fibroblasts and ECE as well as prevented apoptosis of infected cells. Likewise, chicken cell line transfected with RNAi molecules specific for the NP or PA of AIV showed decrease the levels of NP mRNA and infective titer of an H10N8 quail virus [1]. Also, NP-specific siRNA reduced H5N1 virus replication in cell culture and ECE [51]. Moreover, siRNA molecules targeting the NP, PA and PB1 genes interfered with replication of H1N1 virus in ECE [9].
One of the most advantages of siRNA application in poultry, in contrast to AIV vaccines, that it might not require an intact immune system [3] which is very important particularly in developing countries where a number of immunosuppressive agents are endemic in poultry. In addition, siRNA molecules targeting the highly conserved regions in influenza genome potentially remain effective regardless of the inter- and intra-subtype genetic and antigenic variations of AIV [3, 38]. Moreover, it has also the potential to reduce the emergence of viable resistant variants [7], in this regard combinations of siRNA molecules “cocktail” targeting several genes/regions may be used simultaneously [10, 20]. Furthermore, there is no risk of recombination between siRNA nucleotides and circulating influenza viruses; hence siRNA is complementary to the influenza virus genome [7]. Moreover, the siRNA dose required for inhibition of AIV is very low (sub-nanomoles) [10]. Nevertheless, arise of mutants with the ability to evade the inhibition effect of siRNA are not fully excluded [3]. Unfortunately, there is no stretch of conserved nucleotides in the NA and HA genes sufficient to generate specific siRNA due to extensive variations in these genes among AIV from different species [10]. The siRNA molecules are quickly degraded in-vivo affording a transient short-term protection and multiple-dose is required [1]. None of the siRNAs must share any sequence identity with the host genome to avoid non-specific RNAi-induced gene silencing of the host cells [2, 8, 10, 41]. Delivery vehicle of siRNA to the site of infection is a major constraint [23, 39] remained to be investigated on flock-level in poultry. There is accumulating evidence that siRNA is efficient to inhibit influenza virus replication in-vitro, however in-vivo studies still missing. Research studies focus on mass application of siRNA in poultry as a spray or via drinking water are highly recommended [25]. 
References
1.         Abrahamyan A, Nagy E, Golovan SP (2009) Human H1 promoter expressed short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) suppress avian influenza virus replication in chicken CH-SAH and canine MDCK cells. Antiviral research 84:159-167
2.         Aigner A (2006) Gene silencing through RNA interference (RNAi) in vivo: strategies based on the direct application of siRNAs. J Biotechnol 124:12-25
3.         Bennink JR, Palmore TN (2004) The promise of siRNAs for the treatment of influenza. Trends in molecular medicine 10:571-574
4.         Betakova T, Svancarova P (2013) Role and application of RNA interference in replication of influenza viruses. Acta virologica 57:97-104
5.         Chen HY, Cui BA, Xia PA, Li XS, Hu GZ, Yang MF, Zhang HY, Wang XB, Cao SF, Zhang LX, Kang XT, Tu K (2008) Cloning, in vitro expression and bioactivity of duck interleukin-18. Veterinary immunology and immunopathology 123:205-214
6.         Chen HY, Shang YH, Yao HX, Cui BA, Zhang HY, Wang ZX, Wang YD, Chao AJ, Duan TY (2011) Immune responses of chickens inoculated with a recombinant fowlpox vaccine coexpressing HA of H9N2 avain influenza virus and chicken IL-18. Antivir Res 91:50-56
7.         Chen J, Chen SC, Stern P, Scott BB, Lois C (2008) Genetic strategy to prevent influenza virus infections in animals. The Journal of infectious diseases 197 Suppl 1:S25-28
8.         Elbashir SM, Harborth J, Lendeckel W, Yalcin A, Weber K, Tuschl T (2001) Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature 411:494-498
9.         Ge Q, McManus MT, Nguyen T, Shen CH, Sharp PA, Eisen HN, Chen J (2003) RNA interference of influenza virus production by directly targeting mRNA for degradation and indirectly inhibiting all viral RNA transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:2718-2723
10.       Ge Q, Eisen HN, Chen J (2004) Use of siRNAs to prevent and treat influenza virus infection. Virus research 102:37-42
11.       Ge Q, Filip L, Bai A, Nguyen T, Eisen HN, Chen J (2004) Inhibition of influenza virus production in virus-infected mice by RNA interference. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:8676-8681
12.       Hui EK, Yap EM, An DS, Chen IS, Nayak DP (2004) Inhibition of influenza virus matrix (M1) protein expression and virus replication by U6 promoter-driven and lentivirus-mediated delivery of siRNA. The Journal of general virology 85:1877-1884
13.       Jenkins KA, Lowenthal JW, Kimpton W, Bean AG (2009) The in vitro and in ovo responses of chickens to TLR9 subfamily ligands. Developmental and comparative immunology 33:660-667
14.       Jiang H, Yang H, Kapczynski DR (2011) Chicken interferon alpha pretreatment reduces virus replication of pandemic H1N1 and H5N9 avian influenza viruses in lung cell cultures from different avian species. Virology journal 8:447
15.       Jiao H, Du L, Hao Y, Cheng Y, Luo J, Kuang W, Zhang D, Lei M, Jia X, Zhang X, Qi C, He H, Wang F (2013) Effective inhibition of mRNA accumulation and protein expression of H5N1 avian influenza virus NS1 gene in vitro by small interfering RNAs. Folia microbiologica 58:335-342
16.       Li YC, Kong LH, Cheng BZ, Li KS (2005) Construction of influenza virus siRNA expression vectors and their inhibitory effects on multiplication of influenza virus. Avian diseases 49:562-573
17.       Liniger M, Summerfield A, Ruggli N (2012) MDA5 can be exploited as efficacious genetic adjuvant for DNA vaccination against lethal H5N1 influenza virus infection in chickens. PloS one 7:e49952
18.       Lukacsi K, Molnar M, Siroki O, Rosztoczy I (1985) Combined effects of amantadine and interferon on influenza virus replication in chicken and human embryo trachea organ culture. Acta microbiologica Hungarica 32:357-362
19.       Marcus PI, Girshick T, van der Heide L, Sekellick MJ (2007) Super-sentinel chickens and detection of low-pathogenicity influenza virus. Emerging infectious diseases 13:1608-1610
20.       McSwiggen JA, Seth S (2008) A potential treatment for pandemic influenza using siRNAs targeting conserved regions of influenza A. Expert Opin Biol Th 8:299-313
21.       Meng S, Yang L, Xu C, Qin Z, Xu H, Wang Y, Sun L, Liu W (2011) Recombinant chicken interferon-alpha inhibits H9N2 avian influenza virus replication in vivo by oral administration. Journal of Interferon and Cytokine Research 31:533-538
22.       Mingxiao M, Ningyi J, Zhenguo W, Ruilin W, Dongliang F, Min Z, Gefen Y, Chang L, Leili J, Kuoshi J, Yingjiu Z (2006) Construction and immunogenicity of recombinant fowlpox vaccines coexpressing HA of AIV H5N1 and chicken IL18. Vaccine 24:4304-4311
23.       Morris KV, Rossi JJ (2006) Lentivirus-mediated RNA interference therapy for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Human gene therapy 17:479-486
24.       Novak R, Ester K, Savic V, Sekellick MJ, Marcus PI, Lowenthal JW, Vainio O, Ragland WL (2001) Immune status assessment by abundance of IFN-alpha and IFN-gamma mRNA in chicken blood. Journal of interferon & cytokine research : the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research 21:643-651
25.       O'Neill G (2007) Australia tackles bird flu using RNAi. Nature biotechnology 25:605-606
26.       Qu H, Yang L, Meng S, Xu L, Bi Y, Jia X, Li J, Sun L, Liu W (2013) The differential antiviral activities of chicken interferon alpha (ChIFN-alpha) and ChIFN-beta are related to distinct interferon-stimulated gene expression. PloS one 8:e59307
27.       Rahman MM, Uyangaa E, Han YW, Kim SB, Kim JH, Choi JY, Yoo DJ, Hong JT, Han SB, Kim B, Kim K, Eo SK (2011) Oral administration of live attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium expressing chicken interferon-alpha alleviates clinical signs caused by respiratory infection with avian influenza virus H9N2. Veterinary microbiology 154:140-151
28.       Rahman MM, Uyangaa E, Han YW, Kim SB, Kim JH, Choi JY, Eo SK (2012) Oral co-administration of live attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium expressing chicken interferon-alpha and interleukin-18 enhances the alleviation of clinical signs caused by respiratory infection with avian influenza virus H9N2. Veterinary microbiology 157:448-455
29.       Reemers SS, van Haarlem DA, Groot Koerkamp MJ, Vervelde L (2009) Differential gene-expression and host-response profiles against avian influenza virus within the chicken lung due to anatomy and airflow. Journal of General Virology 90:2134-2146
30.       Reuter A, Soubies S, Hartle S, Schusser B, Kaspers B, Staeheli P, Rubbenstroth D (2013) Antiviral activity of interferon-lambda in chickens. J Virol
31.       Sekellick MJ, Ferrandino AF, Hopkins DA, Marcus PI (1994) Chicken interferon gene: cloning, expression, and analysis. Journal of interferon research 14:71-79
32.       Sekellick MJ, Carra SA, Bowman A, Hopkins DA, Marcus PI (2000) Transient resistance of influenza virus to interferon action attributed to random multiple packaging and activity of NS genes. Journal of interferon & cytokine research : the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research 20:963-970
33.       Song L, Zhao DG, Wu YJ, Li Y (2008) Transient expression of chicken alpha interferon gene in lettuce. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B 9:351-355
34.       Stewart CR, Bagnaud-Baule A, Karpala AJ, Lowther S, Mohr PG, Wise TG, Lowenthal JW, Bean AG (2012) Toll-like receptor 7 ligands inhibit influenza A infection in chickens. Journal of interferon & cytokine research : the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research 32:46-51
35.       Stram Y, Kuzntzova L (2006) Inhibition of viruses by RNA interference. Virus genes 32:299-306
36.       Suarez DL, Schultz-Cherry S (2000) Immunology of avian influenza virus: a review. Developmental and comparative immunology 24:269-283
37.       Sui HY, Zhao GY, Huang JD, Jin DY, Yuen KY, Zheng BJ (2009) Small interfering RNA targeting m2 gene induces effective and long term inhibition of influenza A virus replication. PloS one 4:e5671
38.       Suzuki H, Saitoh H, Suzuki T, Takaku H (2009) Inhibition of influenza virus by baculovirus-mediated shRNA. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser (Oxf):287-288
39.       Thomas M, Ge Q, Lu JJ, Klibanov AM, Chen J (2005) Polycation-mediated delivery of siRNAs for prophylaxis and treatment of influenza virus infection. Expert Opin Biol Th 5:495-505
40.       Tompkins SM, Lo CY, Tumpey TM, Epstein SL (2004) Protection against lethal influenza virus challenge by RNA interference in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:8682-8686
41.       Wadhwa R, Kaul SC, Miyagishi M, Taira K (2004) Know-how of RNA interference and its applications in research and therapy. Mutation research 567:71-84
42.       Wei L, Jiao P, Yuan R, Song Y, Cui P, Guo X, Zheng B, Jia W, Qi W, Ren T, Liao M (2013) Goose Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7), myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) and antiviral molecules involved in anti-H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus response. Veterinary immunology and immunopathology 153:99-106
43.       Wei Q, Peng GQ, Jin ML, Zhu YD, Zhou HB, Guo HY, Chen HC (2006) [Cloning, prokaryotic expression of chicken interferon-alpha gene and study on antiviral effect of recombinant chicken interferon-alpha]. Sheng wu gong cheng xue bao = Chinese journal of biotechnology 22:737-743
44.       Wong JP, Christopher ME, Viswanathan S, Dai X, Salazar AM, Sun LQ, Wang M (2009) Antiviral role of toll-like receptor-3 agonists against seasonal and avian influenza viruses. Current pharmaceutical design 15:1269-1274
45.       Wong JP, Christopher ME, Viswanathan S, Karpoff N, Dai X, Das D, Sun LQ, Wang M, Salazar AM (2009) Activation of toll-like receptor signaling pathway for protection against influenza virus infection. Vaccine 27:3481-3483
46.       Xia C, Liu J, Wu ZG, Lin CY, Wang M (2004) The interferon-alpha genes from three chicken lines and its effects on H9N2 influenza viruses. Animal biotechnology 15:77-88
47.    Zhang W, Wang CY, Yang ST, Qin C, Hu JL, Xia XZ (2009) Inhibition of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H5N1 replication by the small interfering RNA targeting polymerase A gene. Biochemical and biophysical research communications 390:421-426
48.       Zhou H, Jin M, Yu Z, Xu X, Peng Y, Wu H, Liu J, Liu H, Cao S, Chen H (2007) Effective small interfering RNAs targeting matrix and nucleocapsid protein gene inhibit influenza A virus replication in cells and mice. Antivir Res 76:186-193
49.       Zhou JY, Chen JG, Wang JY, Wu JX, Gong H (2005) cDNA cloning and functional analysis of goose interleukin-2. Cytokine 30:328-338
50.       Zhou JY, Wang JY, Chen JG, Wu JX, Gong H, Teng QY, Guo JQ, Shen HG (2005) Cloning, in vitro expression and bioactivity of duck interleukin-2. Molecular immunology 42:589-598
51.       Zhou K, He H, Wu Y, Duan M (2008) RNA interference of avian influenza virus H5N1 by inhibiting viral mRNA with siRNA expression plasmids. Journal of biotechnology 135:140-144
Related topics
Authors:
Sayed Abd El-Whab
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut
Follow
Join to be able to comment.
Once you join Engormix, you will be able to participate in all content and forums.
* Required information
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Create a post
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.
LoginRegister