Effect of different dietary strategies on gas emissions and growth performance in post-weaned piglets
Published: May 24, 2017
By: G. Montalvo 1, J. Morales 1, C. Piñeiro 1, S. Godbout 2 and M. Bigeriego 3.
/ 1 PigCHAMP Pro Europa, S.L. C/ Santa Catalina, 10, Local. 40003 Segovia, Spain; 2 IRDA. 3300 Rue Sicootte. C.P. 480 Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada; 3 Spanish Ministry of Agriculture. Food and Environment. C/ Almagro, 33. 28071 Madrid, Spain.
Summary
The objective of this study was to assess the effects of different dietary strategies in post-weaned piglets on gas emissions and animal performance. Eighty piglets were allotted in ten environmentally-controlled chambers. Piglets were fed with five different isoenergetic diets: control, low protein (LP), inclusion of sugar beet pulp (SBP), addition of benzoic acid (BA) and a combination of LP, SBP and BA (LP + SBP + BA). The gases analyzed were ammonia (NH3), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2). For NH3, the most effective treatment was LP, with a reduction of 61%. The LP + SBP + BA reduced NH3 emission by 51%, the inclusion of SBP by 43% and the least effective technique was BA, which decreased by 9.5%, compared to control. The CH4 emission was reduced by 30% for LP, but was increased by 23% for SBP and 24.6% for LP + SBP + BA. Benzoic acid did not differ from control group. The N2O emission did not show statistically differences, and CO2 and carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq) emission increased with LP + SBP + BA (14 and 15% respectively), but were not affected by other diets. No effect of dietary treatment was observed on the growth performances compared with control group (p > 0.05). We can conclude that the best technique to reduce NH3 emission was LP. Inclusion of SBP decreases NH3 emission, but can increase greenhouse gas emissions. It would be interesting to evaluate the effect of higher percentages of BA because the promising results. Combining techniques is not a good strategy to obtain an additive effect in gas emissions reduction.
Additional key words: pig production; aerial pollutants; protein; benzoic acid; sugar beet pulp.
Introduction
Livestock production in confinement facilities results in gas emissions such as ammonia (NH3), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2). In pig production, NH3, CH4 and N2O are products of manure decomposition while CO2 is primarily a product of animal metabolism. Ammonium (NH4+), under acidic or neutral pH conditions or NH3 at higher pH levels, contribute directly to fine particulate matter and, once removed, to ecosystem fertilization, acidification and eutrophication (NRC, 2003). Excess deposition of reactive nitrogen can decrease the biodiversity of terrestrial ecosystems (NRC, 1997). Regarding greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, CH4 due to its long residence time (~8.4 years), becomes globally distributed and contributes to global warming with a global warming potential 21 times that of CO2 (IPCC, 2006). The N2O, once emitted, is globally distributed because of its long residence time (~100 years); it contributes to both tropospheric warming and stratospheric ozone depletion (IPCC, 2006). The CO2 is produced during the oxidation process of carbon compounds in metabolic processes. Increasing the efficiency of nutrient utilization can be expected to decrease CO2 production (Clark et al., 2006).
During recent years, different dietary strategies have been successfully assessed to reduce gas emissions in piglet production. Several studies have demonstrated that lowering dietary protein levels has strong effect on NH3 emission (Latimier & Dourmad, 1993; Canh et al., 1998a; Zervas & Zijlstra, 2002; Le et al., 2008). This is based on an average of 8% reduction in N excretion per unit of crude protein (CP) reduction (Kerr, 1995; Hobbs et al., 1996; Canh et al., 1998a), and would give similar piglet performance if diets are balanced in essentials amino acids (AA) (Hansen et al., 1993; Le Bellego & Noblet, 2002).
Inclusion of non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) into swine diets also shifts nitrogen excretion from urine to feces (Canh et al., 1997). Because of fecal nitrogen is less easily degraded to NH3, the inclusion of SBP into grow-finishing diets results in a linear relationship between the NSP intake and the NH3 emission, decreasing by 5.4% for each 100 g increase in the intake of dietary NSP (Canh et al., 1998b). However, digestibility of nitrogen and energy can be reduced by the inclusion of sugar beet pulp in pig diets (Chabeauti et al., 1991; Zervas & Zijlstra, 2002), thus affecting animal performance.
On the other hand, Cortus (2006) observed that urinary pH has a major impact on the volatilization potential of NH3. As pH is reduced, the NH4+ concentration increases and NH3 concentration decreases within a solution. The pH of urine can be lowered by adding acidifying components to the diet, e.g. benzoic acid. These effects have been proven especially for pigs (Martin, 1982; Guiziou et al., 2006; Aarnink & Verstegen, 2007). In addition, according to several authors, the environmental benefits of these different dietary techniques could be additive (Shriver et al., 2002; Zervas & Zijlstra, 2002).
The objective of this study was to assess the effects of different dietary strategies (CP reduction, benzoic acid inclusion, sugar beet pulp supplementation and their combination) in post-weaned piglets on gas emissions, animal performance, water consumption and manure production and composition.
Material and methods
Experimental animals
A total of 80 (Yorkshire x Landrace) x Duroc piglets of 30 days of age, from a pig breeding company, were allotted in ten environmentally-controlled chambers based on sex (4 entire males and 4 females were caged together in each chamber). Pigs were allotted to 1 of 5 dietary treatments based on body weight (BW) in a randomized complete block design (2 pens per treatment and 8 pigs per pen). All pigs were fed a commercial prestarter diet for and adaptation period of 1 week prior to the start of the experiment, to allow the pigs to become accustomed to the chambers. At day 0 of the study, the mean age of the piglets was 37 days and initial BW was 13.1±2.37. The experiment lasted 28 days, until pigs were 65 days of age.
Treatments were as follows: 1) control diet-CON, 19.7% CP, 2) dietary inclusion of sugar beet pulp-SBP, 19.7% CP, 3) low protein diet-LP, 16.6% CP, 4) addition of benzoic acid-BA, 19.7% CP, and 5) a combination of LP, SBP and BA-LP + SBP + BA; 16.6% CP. Benzoic acid was provided by a commercial company (VevoVitall®; DSM Nutritional Products Ltd., Basel, Switzerland) and used at the manufacturer’s recommended dose (5 mg per kg of feed). Diets were formulated to meet or exceed established nutrient requirements (NRC, 1998; Table 1). Diets were isoenergetic and digestible lysine was also constant among them. Each chamber was equipped with a 2-hole self-feeder and a nipple waterer allowing ad libitum access to feed and water. Pigs were individually weighed and feed disappearance controlled at days 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 experimental days, to calculate average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) in each phase. In each chamber, also the water consumption was measured at each drinker by precalibrated water meters (C-700 polymer ABB, Atlantic Liquid Meters, Ontario, Canada).
Table 1. Diet formulation
1 CON: Control; SBP: Inclusion of sugar beet pulp; LP: Low protein diet; BA: addition of benzoic acid; LP + SBP + BA: combination of LP, SBP, and BA. 2 Premix vit-min supplied per kg final feed: Vitamin A: 12,000 IU; Vitamin D3: 2,000 IU; Vitamin E: 40 mg; Vitamin K3: 2.0 mg; Vitamin B1: 3.0 mg; Vitamin B2: 4.0 mg; Vitamin B6: 3.0 mg; Vitamin B12: 20 mg; Nicotinic acid: 25.0 mg; Pantothenic acid: 15.0 mg; Biotine 125 mg ; Choline chloride: 200 mg; Fe: 60 mg (as FeCO3); Mn: 45.0 mg (as MnO); Zn: 120 mg (as ZnO); Cu: 135.0 mg (as CuSO4 *5H2O); Co: 0.50 mg (as 2CoCO3 *3 Co(OH)2·H2O); I: 1.0 mg (as KI); Se: 0.34 mg (as Na2SeO3); Ethoxyquin: 0.06 mg. 3 SID: standardized ileal digestible.
Environmental chambers
The experiment was developed in ten environmentally controlled chambers, located at IRDA, Deschambault, Quebec. The chambers had width, length, height dimensions of 1.14 m, 2.44 m and 2.44 m, respectively. All the joints in the chambers and along the manure storage area were sealed. The door hardware ensured that the doors were sealed when closed. The flooring was fully slatted with the manure being stored in a shallow pit located under the floor. The manure was removed by a vacuum pump on days 7, 21 and 28 of experiment, weighed and sampled.
The ventilation system consisted of an inlet and exhaust fan mounted in the ceiling of each chamber.
The exhaust fan was able to vary the airflow from 0.4 to 2.5 m3 min–1, to keep room temperature in the expected ranges. The exhaust air was directed through a 204 mm iris orifice damper (Model 200; Continental fan manufacturer inc., Buffalo, NY, USA). Its accuracy was rated at ± 5%. Ventilation was measured once every 2 h.
A differential pressure transducer measured the pressure across the orif ice plate. The relationship between airflow and pressure was:
.
where Q = exhaust airflow, L s–1; and P = differential pressure, cm H2O.
The inlet air could be preheated by an induction heater. The operation of the heater and the ventilation fan were controlled by a temperature controller (EVS- 22HA; Norsol Electronics, St-Hubert, Qc, Canada). The minimum ventilation rate was adjusted to 14 L s–1 in each chamber. The temperature in the chambers varied from about 25°C on day 1 of experiment (with 37 days of mean age) to 23°C on day 28. Lighting was provided at an intensity of 70 lux at 2.3 m from the floor from 7:00 h to 19:00 h.
Gas emissions
Relative humidity and temperature in the chambers were measured by a combined temperature and relative humidity probe (Model CS500, Campbell Sci., Logan, UT, USA) which was calibrated by a mercury thermometer (±0.4°C) and with a saturated aqueous salt solution. The dew point of the incoming air was available from the inlet ambient temperature and relative humidity values. The output from the temperature and relative humidity probe and the pressure differential transducer were recorded every 10 min by an acquisition system (Model CR-10, Campbell Sci., Edmonton, AB, Canada).
The sampling air was pumped through Teflon™ tubing until the laboratory, placed in the room beside the chambers. In this laboratory, CH4, CO2 and N2O were analyzed by gas chromatography (model 3600, Varian, Walnut Creek, CA, USA). The strategy for chromatographic analysis was the separation of the three gases in columns packed with Porapak Q (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). The CH4 was quantified with a flame ionisation detector while the CO2 and N2O were measured with an electron capture detector. The instrumental errors on CO2, CH4 and N2O concentrations were ±30, 0.5 and 0.1 ppm, respectively. The NH3 was analyzed by a non-dispersive infrared spectroscopy (Model 7MB2121, Siemens Ultramat, Willer eng. Montreal, Canada). The NH3 concentration error was ±1.5 ppm.
The gas chromatograph analyzed the gases (CH4, CO2 and N2O) circulating in the injection loop of the instrument at the end of each 10-min period. Then the sample was drawn from the next sampling location. The NH3 concentration was an average of the concentrations of NH3 in the sample air drawn during the last minute of the 10-min period. The flow rate of the sampling pump (Model PU356-N05.16, KNF Neuberger, USA) was ±2 L min–1. All gas concentration measurements (mg m–3) were taken continuously during the entire experiment included the concentration in the incoming air of the rooms. Calibration GHG measurements were taken once a day at 0:00, and were synchronized with the ventilation flow rate.
Cellulose fibre filters were placed at the end of each sampling Teflon™ tubes (6.4 mm diameter) to prevent dust particles from damaging the gas analyzers. To prevent condensation in the tubes, the conduit carrying the gas sampling tubes was ventilated by air maintained at 35°C. To maintain similar flow conditions, all tubes had a length of 25 m.
To obtain gas emissions, the following equations were used:
where Egas = gas emissions (mggas day–1 kgpig–1);
Cgas out = gas concentration in the room measured close to the air extraction: exhaust air (mg m–3); Cgas in = gas concentration outside, measured close to the chambers: inlet air (mg m–3); ?gas = mass of gas by air volume (kggas m–3 air); Q = room ventilation rate (m3 air s–1); Mpig = total mass of the pigs in the room (kg); and 86400 s d–1 = 24 h d–1 *3600 s h–1. Mass of gas by air volume:
where - air = air density (1.2 kgair m–3 air); Dgas = specific gravity (kggas kgair –1) at 101 kPa and 21°C and is equal to: NH3 = 0.597; CH4 = 0.55; CO2 = 1.52; N2O = 1.53.
Since gas concentrations are less accurate than their specific gravities and the temperatures during the study varied between 18 and 24°C, the specific gravities at 21°C and 1,013 bar were used for all periods.
Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq) was also calculated. This is a measure used to compare the emissions from various GHG based upon their global warming potential. The global warming potential for CH4 over 100 years is 21, for N2O is 310 and for CO2 is 1 (IPCC, 2007).
Composition of manure
Total amount of manure was removed from each chamber weekly, and then homogenized by mechanical agitation. Three samples (500 mL) were taken from three random spots and mixed to get one final aliquot per chamber. The samples were immediately analyzed for dry matter content, pH, total nitrogen, ammonium nitrogen and minerals (total ashes, P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, Mn, Al, B, Cu, Zn and Fe).
Statistical analyses
For evaluation of the effect of dietary treatment on gas emissions and productivity data, the experimental unit was the chamber of 8 pigs. Growth performance data were subjected to analysis of variance, including dietary treatment as main effect and BW at day 0 as covariate. Gas emissions data were also subjected to analysis of variance as repeated measures, using the MIXED procedure. In this case, data were analyzed for the effects of dietary treatment, time (day) and their interaction. In both cases, the dietary treatment response was contrasted using the Tukey’s test, and the significance level for all tests was set at p <0.05. All calculations were performed using SAS software v. 9.0 (SAS, 2002).
Results
Ambient conditions
The temperature and relative humidity mean values per week for the dietary treatments during the last three weeks of the experiment are shown in Table 2. The mean temperatures and the relative humidity for each diet treatment were very similar for each week and treatment. Although the airflow rates did fluctuate during the day, the mean values resulted similar.
Table 2. Mean temperature, relative humidity and airflow rates for the last 21 days.
1 CON: control; LP: low protein diet; SBP: inclusion of sugar beet pulp; BA: addition of benzoic acid; LP + SBP + BA: combination of LP, SBP, and BA
Gas emissions
The evolution of NH3, CH4, N2O and CO2 concentration during the trial, obtained for each treatment, is shown in Fig. 1a, 1b, 1c and 1d, respectively. Concentrations of all gases were kept in normal ranges in nursery piglets throughout the experimental period.
The higher NH3 concentrations corresponded to CON and BA groups (2.67 and 2.55 mg m–3, of mean NH3 concentration during the experimental period, respectively). The LP and LP + SBP + BA diet presented lower concentrations (1.46 and 1.53 mg m–3), and SBP had an average NH3 concentration of 1.77 mg m–3. The effect of removing the manure appears to explain the decreases occurring on days 7, 21 and 28 of the trial (Fig. 1a).
The mean CH4 concentrations increased from 2.20 to 4.49 mg m–3 from week 1 to 4 (Fig. 1b). The LP and CON diets showed the lowest mean concentrations of CH4 (2.69 and 3.15 mg m–3, respectively) and BA the highest one (3.57 mg m–3). Combination of treatments and SBP had a mean CH4 concentration of 3.4 mg m–3 during the trial.
Overall N2O concentration during the entire trial was 0.65 mg m–3. Little change in N2O occurred throughout the 4-week period (Fig. 1c), except during the last 7 days where a sudden increase (from day 21 to day 25) and subsequent decrease (on day 27) was observed. All treatments had similar N2O concentration.
The mean CO2 concentration differential was near 2890 mg m–3 for all the treatments. Over the 4-week period, the CO2 concentration increased from 2100 to 3200 mg m–3 (Fig. 1d). All treatments had similar CO2 concentrations. The effect of removing the manure appears to explain the decreases occurring on days 7, 21 and 28 of the trial (Fig. 1d).
Figure 1. Evolution of ammonia (a), methane (b), nitrous oxide (c) and carbon dioxide (d) concentration (average net concentration of the two chambers for each treatment) during the trial (mg m–3). Low protein (LP); inclusion of sugar beet pulp (SBP); addition of benzoic acid (BA); a combination of LP, SBP and BA (LP+SBP+BA).
Overall ventilation rate (Fig. 2) over the entire trial was 1.40 m3 min–1, being similar for all treatments.
Figure 2. Evolution of ventilation rate of each chamber (m3 min–1). Low protein (LP); inclusion of sugar beet pulp (SBP); addition of benzoic acid (BA); a combination of LP, SBP and BA (LP+SBP+BA).
Mean gas emissions (mg kg pig–1day–1) of different dietary treatments are presented in Table 3. The four experimental diets evaluated decreased NH3 emission in the trial with respect to the CON. The most effective treatment was LP diet, with a reduction of 61% compared with CON diet. Combination treatment obtained an NH3 reduction of 51%. The inclusion of SBP reduced NH3 emission by 43% and the least effective technique was the addition of BA, not differing statistically from the CON group.
Table 3. Effects of different dietary treatments on gas emission (mg kgpig –1 day–1)1
1 Least squares means for two chambers, each with eight pigs. 2 CON = control; LP=low protein diet; SBP=inclusion of sugar beet pulp; BA=addition of benzoic acid; LP+SBP+BA=combination of LP, SBP, and BA. 3 SE = standard error. 4 CO2eq = (methane emission *21) + (nitrous oxide emission *310) + carbon dioxide emission (IPCC, 2007). abc Mean values within a row lacking a common superscript letter differ significantly (p < 0.05)
However, CH4 emission were reduced by 30% for LP compared to CON diet, but were increased by the inclusion of SBP (23%) and the LP + SBP + BA treatment (24.6%). The BA inclusion did not result in statistical differences.
Diet modification did not decrease N2O emission in all different dietary strategies compared with CON group although, in any case, differences were significant.
With respect to the CO2 emission, LP, SBP and BA diets did not differ from CON group, while LP + SBP + BA treatment increased CO2 emission by 14% compared with CON diet.
The diets affected the CO2eq emission in a similar way to the CO2 emission, with no effect of the LP, SBP and BA diets and LP + SBP + BA treatment increasing CO2 emission by 15%.
Animal performance
The growth performance of piglets fed with the different dietary treatments is shown in Table 4. Initial BW did not show statistical differences. No effect of dietary treatment was observed on the global performances of piglets (p > 0.05). However, BW and ADG were lower and FCR was higher in LP + SBP + BA dietary treatment than in SBP group after the first experimental week. None of the dietary treatments tested as feed strategies to reduce gas emissions showed statistical differences in growth performance compared with CON diet. Nevertheless these differences were attenuated during the subsequent days and no effect was observed thereafter.
Table 4. Effects of different diets on body weight (BW, kg) at day 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 of the trial, and average daily gain (ADG, kg), average daily feed intake (ADFI, kg) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) per week
1 CON: control; LP: low protein diet; SBP: inclusion of sugar beet pulp; BA: addition of benzoic acid; LP + SBP + BA: combination of LP, SBP, and BA. 2 SE: standard error. ab Mean values within a row lacking a common superscript letter differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Water disappearance
The water disappearance for each treatment consisted of both consumption and waste by the pigs. The water disappearance was similar for all dietary treatments and no significant differences were obtained (Table 5). Numerically, the LP+SPB+BA dietary treatment had lower water consumption. These pigs used about 3.93 L pig–1 day–1 over the 4-week period whereas those in the other treatments used over 5 L pig–1 day–1.
Table 5. Water disappearance (L pig–1 day–1) for each diet treatment1 during the trial.
1 CON: control; LP: low protein diet; SBP: inclusion of sugar beet pulp; BA: addition of benzoic acid; LP + SBP + BA: combination of LP, SBP, and BA. 2 SE: standard error.
Manure production and composition
Manure production (total kg) was measured on days 7, 21 and 28 by emptying the storage pits and weighing the contents. No differences were observed between treatments (data not shown), and numerically were similar between them, except in the LP + SBP + BA dietary treatment where the production was lower, associated with lower water disappearance with this diet.
The manure analysis of the weekly composite samples did not show significant differences. Numerically the CON group showed the highest pH value (7.2), similar to the BA treatment (7.1), and higher than pH of the rest of treatments (LP, SBM and LP + SBP + BA; 6.6, 6.6 and 6.0, respectively).
Treatments with LP in the diet (LP and LP + SBP + BA) had the lowest values of total nitrogen excretion (7.6 and 7.8 g pig–1 day–1) and N-NH4 (3.2 and 2.7 g pig–1 day–1), respectively. Nitrogen excretion in SBP and BA was similar (9.5 and 9.8 g pig–1 day–1) and higher than in control diet (8.6 g pig–1 day–1). In any case, differences did not reach significance (p > 0.05).
Mineral content in manure was similar in all dietary treatments and no significant differences were observed
Discussion
While the efficacy of feeding strategies to abate NH3 emission from pigs has been widely studied, traditionally researchers have been little concerned with GHG emissions by piglets. However, GHG emissions appear to be directly related to nutrient efficiency in pigs, suggesting that better production efficiency is accompanied by reduced GHG emissions per kg of product (Clark et al., 2006). Several strategies appear promising to improve nutrient efficiency. First, the intake of excess nutrients can be reduced toward the current nutrient requirement to keep growth performance. Examples of this strategy include the reduction of dietary CP content combined with AA supplementation (Lenis & Jongbloed, 1999; Han et al., 2001). Another strategy is to improve nutrient digestion (mainly carbohydrate fractions) using feed additives, which leaves less substrate available for bacterial processes and the subsequent production of undesirable gases (Sutton et al., 1996; Mackie et al., 1998).
In general, diets have more protein than the animals’ requirement, leading to unutilized protein. Reduction in dietary CP and at the same time supplementing most essential AA to maintain AA balance is expected to reduce NH3 emission, without negative effects on pigs’ performance. In this experimental trial, a reduction of the protein content (19.7% to 16.6%) decreased NH3 emission by 61%, obtaining a higher efficacy than expected. This result is in accordance with the findings of several authors (Kerr, 1995; Hobbs et al., 1996; Canh et al., 1998a). Total nitrogen excretion was also reduced (12%), but by a lower proportion than NH3 emission. The somewhat higher reduction of NH3 emission compared to the reduction in ammonium content could be explained by the fact that the pH of the manure was lowered as well when dietary CP level decreased. Latimier & Dourmad (1993) and Canh et al. (1998a) also found similarity in the relative reduction in nitrogen excretion and NH3 emission.
With few exceptions, 1% (absolute) reduction of dietary protein content has been found to reduce N excretion from pigs by approximately 10% (relative) (Canh et al., 1998a; Lenis & Jongbloed, 1999). According to these results, in the present study, total N content in manure was reduced in LP dietary treatments by 10.4% (relative). However, high variability of this variable and low number of replicates used in the present experiment probably did not allow differences to reach significance.
This nutritional strategy likewise can also reduce GHG emissions, according to several studies (Lenis & Jongbloed, 1999; Han et al., 2001). Assuming the excreted N is fully converted to N2O, the reduction in N excretion would reduce the CO2eq when feeding the LP diet (Ball & Möhn, 2003). In this experiment, the LP diet reduced CH4 emission, but N2O and CO2 emissions did not differ from the CON group, resulting in similar overall GHG emissions. Likely age and weight of animals directly affect magnitude of this response. In this sense, studies conducted by Lenis & Jongbloed (1999) and by Han et al. (2001) used adult sows and fattening pigs, respectively.
It was anticipated that reducing dietary CP while balancing the diets for essential AA would support similar piglet performance. Results obtained in growth performance in the present study confirm this statement, in agreement with Hansen et al. (1993) and Le Bellego & Noblet (2002). However, contrary to this, other authors as Nyachoti et al. (2006) found that BW and the overall ADG were reduced by feeding diets containing 19-17% CP compared with higher contents (21-23%). This was not the case in the current experiment, even using lower dietary CP content (16.6%). The discrepancies between results obtained in different studies may be explained by the differences in the age of piglets used. Nyachoti et al. (2006) used piglets weaned at an earlier age (18±1 days of age), but in the current study or in Le Bellego & Noblet (2002), piglets were weaned at 28-30 days of age. Likely, the apparent inconsistency in effect of dietary CP content with AA supplementation on the growth performance in some studies could be associated with deficiencies of other nutrients, including non-essential AA, which may become limiting factors in earlyweaned piglets.
Inclusion of NSP as SBP reduced NH3 emission, supporting the hypothesis that fermentable carbohydrates in the diet can influence the NH3 emission from pig slurry. In this trial, the addition of SBP (10%) decreased NH3 emission by 43%. Cahn et al. (1997; 1998b) performed different experiments with SBP and obtained similar results. The most profound effect on NH3 emission was found when 15% SBP was included in the diet and NH3 emission decreased by 40%. However, the CH4 emission increased with SBP dietary inclusion, in this due to both enteric and manure CH4 production (Clark et al., 2006). In fact, the amount of NSP in swine diets is clearly linked to enteric CH4 production (Jensen, 1996). Zhu et al. (1993) observed an increase of CH4 production following increasing levels of SBP.
Piglet performance was not affected by the use of SBP diet at the end of the study, according to Clark et al. (2006) but contrary to other authors (Chabeauti et al., 1991; Zervas & Zijlstra, 2002). Zervas & Zijlstra (2002) included higher amount of SBP (20%), but used pigs with higher BW (23.7 kg at day 0). Ability to digest NSP components increases with age of pigs, since grower and finisher pigs can utilize dietary fiber better than young piglets (Choct et al., 2010), then not affecting growth rate.
The use of BA diet in pigs may result in lowering the buffering capacity of diets, and subsequently in increasing the acidity of urine. The latter effect is due to a metabolic transformation of the anionic part into hippuric acid voided in urine. A lowered urinary pH is preferable from the environmental point of view because indoor volatilization of NH3 (Mroz et al., 1996). In the current experiment, inclusion of BA did not reduce NH3 emission, contrary to other authors (Sauer et al., 2008) and neither did it affect manure pH. The proportion of BA added to the diet (0.5%) was lower than the used by Sauer et al. (2008), who added 2% of BA to obtain a reduction in urine pH from 7.32 to 5.32. According to the present study, Guiziou et al. (2006) did not observe any effect on manure pH after 1% BA dietary inclusion. It is possible that, with a higher proportion of BA, NH3 emission reduction would have been significant.
An improvement in growth performance promoted by BA dietary supplementation should be also expected, as found by other studies (Torrallardona et al., 2005). This could be related to the increase of nutrient digestion (Sutton et al., 1996; Mackie et al., 1998). However, differences in BW, ADG and FCR in the first two experimental weeks did not reach significance, likely due to the low number of replicates used in the present study.
Combining all three dietary strategies did not have an additive effect, as predicted by several authors (Shriver et al., 2002; Zervas & Zijlstra, 2002). By contrast, this treatment increases NH3 emission relative to the LP diet and had the highest CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions. In addition, the combination of three treatments adversely affected animal performance, and at day 7 BW was lower than piglets in SBP dietary tretament. All these negative results might be associated with a reduction of nutrient digestion, providing more substrate for bacterial fermentation in the hindgut and the consequent production of undesirable gases. However, more studies are required to assess possible negative interactions between all three dietary strategies applied at the same time.
In summary, under the experimental conditions of the present experiment we can conclude that the best dietary strategy studied to reduce NH3 emission was the reduction of dietary CP content combined with AA supplementation, also promoting a CH4 emission reduction. Dietary inclusion of NSP, such as SBP, was also efficient to decrease NH3 emission, although other GHG emissions can be affected and increased by this strategy, particularly CH4. The addition of 0.5% BA did not significantly affect NH3 and GHG emissions. Animal performance was not affected by any of these dietary strategies, suggesting that the reduction of dietary CP content could be a good strategy in nursery piglets to reduce the environmental impact. On the other hand, combining these three strategies was not effective to reduce gas emissions and adversely affects animal performance.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported financially by the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment.
This article was originally published in Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 2013 11(4): 1016-1027. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013114-3185. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-by) Spain 3.0 License.
References
Aarnink AJA, Verstegen MWA, 2007. Nutrition. Key factor to reduce environmental load from pig production. Livest Sci 109: 194-203.
Ball RO, Möhn S, 2003. Feeding strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from pigs. Adv Pork Prod 14: 301-311.
Canh TT, Verstegen MWA, Aarnink AJA, Schrama JW, 1997. Influence of dietary factors on nitrogen partitioning and composition of urine and feces of fattening pigs. J Anim Sci 75: 700-706.
Canh TT, Aarnink AJA, Schutte JB, Sutton A, Langhout DJ, Verstegen MWA, 1998a. Dietary protein affects nitrogen excretion and ammonia emission from slurry of growingfinishing pigs. Livest Prod Sci 56: 181-191.
Canh TT, Sutton AL, Aarnink MWA, Verstegen MWA, Schrama JW, Bakker GCM, 1998b. Dietary carbohydrates alter the fecal composition and pH and the ammonia emission from slurry of growing pigs. J Anim Sci 76: 1887-1895.
Chabeauti E, Noblet J, Carre B, 1991. Digestion of plant cell walls from four different sources in growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 32: 207-213.
Choct M, Dersjant-Li Y, McLeish J, Peisker M, 2010. Soy oligosaccharides and soluble non-starch polysaccharides: a review of digestion, nutritive and anti-nutritive effects in pigs and poultry. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 23(10): 1386- 1398.
Clark OG, Moehn S, Price JD, Zhang Y, Sauer WC, Morin B, Feddes JJ, Leonard JJ, Atakora JKA et al., 2006. Diet manipulation to control odor and gas emission from swine production. In: Climate change and managed ecosystems. Taylor & Francis Group. LLC. pp: 295-318.
Cortus EL, 2006. A dynamic model of ammonia production within grow-finish barns. PhD thesis. Univ Saskatchewan. Dept. of Bioresource Engineering. Saskatoon, Canada.
Guiziou F, Dourmad JY, Saint-Cast P, Picard S, Daumer ML, 2006. Reducing ammonia volatilization from pig slurry through the reduction of dietary crude protein and the incorporation on benzoic acid. 12th Ramiran Int Conf. Technology for recycling of manure and organic residues in a whole farm perspective, vol. 1. Danish Inst Agric Sci Report No. 122. pp: 71-74.
Han IK, Lee JK, Piao XS, Defa L, 2001. Feeding and management system to reduce environmental pollution in swine production. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 14: 432.
Hansen JA, Knabe DA, Burgoon KG, 1993. Amino acid supplementation of low-protein sorghum-soybean meal diets for 5 to 20 kilogram swine. J Anim Sci 71: 452-458.
Hobbs PJ, Pain BF, Kay RM, Lee PA, 1996. Reduction of odourous compounds in fresh pig slurry by dietary control of crude protein. J Sci Food Agr 71: 508-514.
IPCC, 2006. N2O emission from managed soils, and CO2 emission from lime and urea application. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. CC/OECD/IEA.
IPCC, 2007. Climate Change 2007. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge Univ Press, UK.
Jensen BB, 1996. Methanogenesis in monogastric animals. Environ Monit Assess 42: 99-112.
Kerr BJ, 1995. Nutritional strategies for waste reduction management. New horizons in animal nutrition and health. The Institute of Nutrition, North Carolina State Univ, USA. pp: 47-68.
Latimier P, Dourmad JY, 1993. Effect of three protein feeding strategies, for growing-finishing pigs, on growth performance and nitrogen output in the slurry and in the air. Nitrogen flow in pig production and environmental consequences. EAAP Publication No. 69.
Le Bellego L, Noblet J, 2002. Performance and utilization of dietary energy and amino acids in piglets fed low protein diets. Livest Prod Sci 76: 45-58.
Le PD, Aarnink AJA, Jongbloed AW, Van der Peet-Schwering CMC, Ogink NWM, Verstegen MWA, 2008. Interactive effects of dietary crude protein and fermentable carbohydrate levels on odour from pig manure. Livest Sci 114: 48-61.
Lenis NP, Jongbloed AW, 1999. New technologies in low pollution swine diets: diet manipulation and use of synthetic amino acids, phytase, and phase feeding for reduction of nitrogen and phosphorus excretion and ammonia emission-review. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 12: 305-327.
Mackie RI, Stroot PG, Varel VH, 1998. Biochemical identification and biological origin of key odor components in livestock waste. J Anim Sci 76: 1331-1342.
Martin AK, 1982. The origin of urinary aromatic compounds excreted by the ruminants 2. The metabolism of phenolic cinnamic acids to benzoic acid. Brit J Nutr 47: 155-164.
Mroz Z, Jongbloed AW, Vreman K, Canh TT, Van Diepen TM, Kemme PA, Kogut J, Aarnink AJA, 1996. The effect of different dietary cation-anion supply on excreta composition and nutrient balance in growing pigs. Institute for Animal Science and Health. Report 96.028, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
NRC, 1997. Biodiversity II. Understanding and protecting our biological resources. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
NRC, 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine, 10th ed. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
NRC, 2003. Air emission from animal feeding operations. Current knowledge. Future needs. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
Nyachoti CM, Omogbenigun FO, Rademacher M, Blank G, 2006. Performance responses and indicators of gastrointestinal heath in early-weaned pigs fed lowprotein amino acid-supplemented diets. J Anim Sci 84: 125-134.
SAS, 2002. SAS/STAT/IML users guide, Vers. 9, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
Sauer W, Cervantes M, Yanez J, Araiza B, Murdoch G, Morales A, Zijlstra RT, 2008. Effect of dietary inclusion of benzoic acid on mineral balance in growing pigs. Livest Sci 122: 162-168.
Shriver JA, Carter SD, Sutton AL, Richert BT, Senne BW, Pettey LA, 2002. Effects of adding fiber sources to reduced-crude protein, amino acid supplemented diets on nitrogen excretion, growth performance, and carcasss traits of finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 81: 492-502.
Sutton AL, Kephart KB, Patterson JA, Mumma R, Kelly DT, Bogus E, Jones DD, Heber A, 1996. Manipulating swine diets to reduce ammonia and odor emission. Prc Int Conf on Air Pollution from Agricultural Operations. Publication C-3. Midwest Plan Service. Ames, IA, USA. pp: 445-452.
Torrallardona D, Badiola JI, Broz J, 2005. Efficacy of benzoic acid in the feeding of weanling pigs. 56th Annual Meeting of EAAP, Uppsala, 5-8 June. p: 329.
Zervas S, Zijlstra RT, 2002. Effects of dietary protein and fermentable f iber on nitrogen excretion patterns and plasma urea in grower pigs. J Anim Sci 80: 3247-3256.
Zhu JQ, Fowler VR, Fuller MF, 1993. Assessment of fermentation in growing pigs given unmolassed sugar-beet pulp: a stoichiometric approach. Br J Nutr 69: 511-525.
Related topics:
Authors:
Recommend
Comment
Share
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Pig Industry
