Explore
Communities in English
Advertise on Engormix

Cow Comfort and Reproductive Performance

Published: September 30, 2016
By: Ray Nebel, Ph.D. / V.P. Tech Services Programs, Select Sires Inc.
It is difficult to present scientifically defensible definitions and specifications for what constitutes "cow comfort", but there is no doubt those good managers "know it when they see it".
Today's dairy cow may face a wide variety of environmental stressors. These may include heat stress, overcrowding, infectious challenge, poor ventilation, poor footing, uncomfortable stalls, poor management of grouping and cow movement, and rough handling. The effects of heat stress on dairy cattle physiology and productivity have been well established. Studies have shown that heat stress during late gestation reduces calf birth weight and subsequent milk production. Dry cows provided with shade gave birth to heavier calves and produced more milk than cows not provided with shade.
Biological response to other forms of stress, such as crowding, poor ventilation, poor footing, and poor stall design, have not been well established for dairy cows. Overcrowding is common in free-stall barns and moderate overcrowding has been reported not to affect milk production if feeding management is good; however, overcrowding should be avoided in the close-up and just-fresh pens. Every cow needs to have a comfortable stall to lie in. Cows naturally seek to isolate themselves from other cows as parturition approaches; in such animals the inability to do so in confinement constitutes a major social stress.
The stress response consists of recognition of a stressor, the biological defense against the stressor, and the consequences of the stress response. It is this last stage that determines whether a cow's productivity and reproduction will be compromised (the stress becomes "distress") or whether the event passes without impact. In many cases the expedient response of an animal is behavioral, by attempting to remove itself from the vicinity of a stressor. For example, a timid cow will move away from the perceived threat of a "boss" cow. When this behavioral response is prevented or limited, say by overcrowding in confinement housing, then the impact on the timid cow may be more negative.
The neuroendocrine system responds with altered secretion of pituitary hormones in an attempt to restore normal function. Alterations in hormone function in response to a stressor affect nearly all functions of animal production, including metabolism, reproduction, lactation, immune competence, and behavior. All of the systems involved to deal with stress produce changes in biological function, and it is these changes that may directly affect the animal's well-being and productivity and reproductive performance. These changes result in shifts of nutrients away from biological processes occurring before the stressor. For example, energy being used for growth in a first-calf heifer may be diverted to cope with the stressor.
For many day-to-day stressors, this biological cost of the stress response is inconsequential. However, with prolonged or severe stress, or with multiple stressors, the biological cost of dealing with the stress becomes significant to the animal. A common example is the increased incidence of respiratory infection (shipping fever) that results from long-haul transport of cattle. Individual cows respond differently to stressors and the responses may vary with the extent, duration and severity. It is almost impossible to determine the exact loss of reproductive performance due to stress except in extreme conditions; however, overcrowding, frequent group changes, and rough handling will impact the ability to achieve efficient reproductive performance.
 
Published by University of Kentucky, College of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service.
Related topics:
Authors:
Ray Nebel
Select Sires Inc.
Recommend
Comment
Share
dr. jamil .m.
13 de abril de 2020
This is one strategy of dairy management , getting as much milk as possible from the cow regardless and not paying attention to the reproduction and new pregnancy The followers of such strategy depends totally of the price of the new replacement pregnant cows . their argument is that the cost of the new pregnant cow from outside the farm is cheaper that the cost of getting the cow pregnant of raising heifer replacement in the farm . In my opinion such strategy has many negative aspects such as: 1) what is the fate and future of the farm if the many people adapt such strategy and the demand on pregnant cows increase and the prices go high 2) the farm will loose and miss the cumulative know how the is supposed to be acquired in the field of reproduction and replacement management 3) raising the replacement in the farm will have better control on the quality of the replacement animals better than the purchased ones ..
Recommend
Reply
Hafiz Wasi Muhammad Khan
29 de octubre de 2016
it does not make sense to keep such cows for a productive farm. If the cows is producing milk continously for 300 days but does not conceive it qualifies to be culled. In karachi cattle market farmers are not interested in calving but only in milk production and once the cow is exhausted in milk production it is replaced so the purpose of such dairy farm should be well defined.
Recommend
Reply
Rajesh Singh Pundir
29 de octubre de 2016
In Cows farm, we make dry to pregnant cows at-least two months before her expected calving date. Does this rule applies on non-pregnant cows. ? Shall we make dry to milking (non-pregnant) cows on completing 300 days of milking. Please share your views in the topic. regards
Recommend
Reply
Hafiz Wasi Muhammad Khan
3 de octubre de 2016

A worth reading article which covers a comprehensive approach about cow comfort and its direct link with production performance.

Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.