Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

Effects of subacute ruminal acidosis on dry matter intake, rumen fermentation, blood variables, and conception rate in Holstein heifers

Published: September 24, 2021
By: H. Khalouei 1, A. A. Alamouti 2, A. M. Sangcheshmeh 2, N. Farzaneh 3, J.C. Plaizier 1 and E. Khafipour 1,4 / 1 Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; 2 Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran; 3 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran; 4 Cargill, Animal Nutrition Division, Diamond V Brand, Cedar Rapids, IA, USA.
Summary

The objective of this study was to determine if experimentally induced subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) reduces conception rates of Holstein heifers. One hundred and ten heifers were synchronized for artificial insemination by two injections of PGF2α in a 13-d interval and assigned randomly to two treatments. The control heifers received a diet containing 32% (DM basis) barley-based concentrate, while the SARA challenge group received a diet containing 68% of this concentrate started 3 d after the 2nd PGF2α injection and continued for seven days. Fortyone heifers from the SARA group and 39 heifers from the control group showed visible signs of heat and were inseminated. Heifers in SARA group had higher dry matter intake (DMI, 10.4 vs. 9.0 kg d-1, P < 0.01) and lower rumen pH (6.02 vs. 6.45, P < 0.01) and fecal pH (6.71 vs. 6.97, P < 0.01). The SARA challenge increased rumen concentrations of lipopolysaccharide, lactate, propionate and valerate, but did not affect the concentrations of acetate, and butyrate. The challenge did not affect glucose, urea nitrogen, aspartate aminotransferase, calcium and cortisol concentrations in blood, but it lowered blood betahydroxy butyrate (P < 0.01). Induction of SARA markedly reduced first service conception rate tested by ultrasonography 28 d after insemination (53.7 vs. 71.8 %, P < 0.05). Additionally, 100% of control heifers that were confirmed as pregnant in the 28-d test were also pregnant at 60-d test, whereas this ratio was only 73.9% (P < 0.01) in SARA-challenged heifers suggesting that SARA had a persistent effect on reproduction. Results suggest negative effects of SARA on fertility of dairy heifers. 

Key words: metabolic acidosis, Fertility, Heifers, Conception rate.

 

Published in the proceedings of the Animal Nutrition Conference of Canada 2020. For information on the event, past and future editions, check out https://animalnutritionconference.ca/.

Content from the event:
Related topics:
Authors:
Ehsan Khafipour
University of Manitoba
University of Manitoba
Recommend
Comment
Share
Viswanatha Reddy
3 de febrero de 2023
I am of the opinion these animals also suffer from subclinical mastitis as the citrate levels drop in SARA {Citrate is formed in TCA cycle - I may be wrong} Either estimating citrate levels in the blood or CMT or SURF EXCEL field mastitis test. In Bangalore Milk Union either CMT or SURF EXCEL field mastitis test is done when ever the Lactometer reading fall below 28. We dissolve 10 grams of SURF EXCEL washing powder in 250 ml water and covered with a black plastic cover and the stability of this lasts for 3 months. Test is done with equal quantity of milk and equal quantity of the above solution and is read like California mastitis test.
Recommend
Reply
Quazi M Emdadul Huque, Ph.D.
Multimode Group
19 de febrero de 2022
Yes , I would like to get more article on acidosis effects Thanks
Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Dairy Cattle
Jim Quigley
Jim Quigley
Cargill
Technical Lead - Calf & Heifer at Cargill
United States
Pietro Celi
Pietro Celi
dsm-Firmenich
dsm-Firmenich
United States
Todd Bilby, Ph.D.
Todd Bilby, Ph.D.
MSD - Merck Animal Health
Dairy Technical Services Manager
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.