Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

Duckweed and/or freshwater crayfish for diet nile tilapia fish

Evaluation of dietary substitution with duckweed and/or freshwater crayfish instead of fish meal in diets for nile tilapia fish

Published: April 5, 2010
By: Abdelhamid. A. M., N. A. Maghraby, A. I. M. Mehrim, and A. A. A. Soliman
 ABSTRACT
 The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of some unconventional diets on diets composition, growth performance, blood picture, whole fish and fish muscles composition, and feed utilization by Nile tilapia fingerlings (7-8g).  Twenty six glass aquaria (60 x 35 x 40 cm) connected with electric pumps for water aeration were used.  Dechlorinated tap water was used to renew third of aquaria water, daily. The basal diet contained 25% crude protein.  The diets were offered daily (at two meals) at 3% of fish body weight. Fish were stocked at a rate of 7 fingerlings per aquarium.  The experimental dies were nearly isocaloric and isonitrogenus.  The 1st diet was a control, diets No. 2 - 5 are the control diet but their fishmeal was substituted by 25, 50, 75 and 100%, respectively with duckweed meal (DW), diets No. 6 - 9 included crayfish meal (CrFi) at the same previous replacement rates, and diets No. 10 - 13 included a mixture of DW + CrFi (1:1) as a substitute for fishmeal at the same rates. The obtained results included that DW contained higher crude protein and ether extract percentages as well as cadmium level than CrFi. CrFi contained more nitrogen free extract, ash, lead and silica than DW. There were significant differences among the experimental diets in their dry matter, crude protein, ether extract, crude fiber and ash contents. Diet No. 13 included the highest crude protein percentage. The increased DW substitution rate up to 75% and CrFi up to 50% led to increase in the dietary crude protein. The increased CrFi level from 25 to 100% gradually decreased the ether extract % in diets No. 6 - 9. The increased dietary inclusion of DW from 25 to 100% (diets No. 2 - 5) led to increase in dietary crude fiber %. There were significant differences among dietary treatments in growth performance parameters including final body weight, body weight gain, daily body weight gain and relative growth rates. The highest values of these criteria were realized with diets No. 11 and 6, respectively. The dietary treatments significantly affected feed intake, feed conversion, protein intake, protein productive value, protein efficiency ratio, and energy retention. The highest feed and protein intakes were found with diet No. 6, but the lowest were recorded for diet No. 12. The best feed conversion was calculated for diet No. 11 (the best treatment in fish bodyweight gain). The best protein utilization (protein productive value and protein efficiency ratio) was calculated for diet No. 13 although the superiority of diet No. 5 in energy retention. Diet No. 6 reflected the highest values of hemoglobin, hematocrit, total protein, and globulin. Transaminases activity increased with diet No. 5 and decreased with diet No. 7 referring to affected hepatic function. The 5th diet also increased blood levels of urea, uric acid and creatinine, referring to affected kidney function. Carcass and muscle composition of the tested fish significantly affected by dietary treatments. The highest dry matter was determined in the 5th group. Diet No. 6 was responsible for the highest protein % and lowest ether extract %, respectively. There were positive relationships between moisture and protein as well as between moisture and ash contents, but negative relationships between moisture and ether extract as well as between protein and ether extract % in whole fish body and fish muscles.  Decreased silica level of the 2nd diet led to low silica content of fish body of this group. The lowest lead content in diet and fish was of the 2nd treatment. The 13th group reflected the highest cadmium levels in diet and fish.
Key words: Nile tilapia - Duckweed - Freshwater crayfish - Performance - Feed utilization - Blood - Composition.
INTRODUCTION
Tilapia culture is one of the fastest growing farming activities, with an average annual growth rate of 13.4%, during 1970-2002. Tilapia is widely cultured in about 100 countries in the tropical and subtropical regions. As a result, the production of farmed tilapia has increased from 383,654 mt in 1990 to 1,505,804 mt in 2002, representing about 6% of total farmed finfish. Nile tilapia is, by far, the most important farmed tilapia species in the world. The  production of farmed Nile tilapia reached 1,217,055 mt representing about 81% of total production of farmed tilapia in 2002 (FAO, 2004). Tilapias are currently raised in different types of production systems ranging from pond, tank, cage, flowing water and intensive water reuse culture systems. (El Sayed et al., 2005). Commercial fish feeds utilized in aquaculture often contain fishmeal, which can comprise up to 65% of the diet. Nile tilapia is herbivorous by nature, consuming mainly phytoplankton (Moriarty, 1973), but can as well consume a variety of other natural food organisms found in ponds. To increase fish production, supplementary or artificial feeds may be added. However, supplementary feeds can take up to 60% of fish production costs (Green, 1992) making them unaffordable for most farmers in developing countries (Liti et al., 2005). Recently, many areas of the world have dietary protein shortage and this situation is most severing in Africa. Fishmeal has been the major source of animal protein in fish diets, its high cost and dwindling availability has called for the search for alternative sources of protein (Adeparusi and Ajayi, 2000). As long as protein component represents 55-75% of the total diet cost, protein alternatives have the first priority in formulating diet of tilapia as alternatives for the high cost of fish meal (Hanley, 2000). The utilization of the cheaper sources such as freshwater crayfish meal or aquatic plants meal is promising and need further investigations (El Sayed et al., 2005). So, the objective of this study was the evaluation of replacing dietary fish   meal protein by plant and animal protein sources in tilapia fish diets and to investigate its effects on growth performance of tilapia fingerlings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Feeding experiment was conducted to evaluate some no conventional diets concerning growth performance, carcass and muscles composition and feed utilization of Nile tilapia, Oreochromios niloticus, fingerlings for 16 weeks. The experimental system consisted of 26 glass aquaria (60×35×40cm), each aquarium was continuously supplied with a compressed air from an electric compressor (Shenzehe Company BS410). Dechlorinated tap water was used to change one third of the water in each aquarium every day. Water was aerated before be used for about 24 hours to remove chlorine. Experimental Fish: A group of Nile tilapia O. niloticus with an average initial body weigh of 7 - 8 g were obtained from a private farm at AL Hamoul, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt and transported to the aquaria Fish were maintained in these aquaria for 2 weeks before the beginning of the experiment for acclimatization purpose. The fish were fed during the acclimatization period on the basal diet (25% crude protein) at a rate of 3% of the body weight daily, at 2 times daily. The experimental treatments were tested at two aquaria (replicates) for each. Fish were stoked at a density of 7 fish / aquarium. Experimental Diet: Partial or complete replacement of fishmeal (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100%) by whole crayfish meal and / or duck weeds meal in Nile tilapia fish diets was carried out. All feedstuffs used in the experimental dies were purchased from the local market. Grayfish was sun-dried, ground and sieved (21 mashes).  Duckweed was collected from a drainage then sun-dried and ground.  Diets were formulated by hand mixing the ground ingredients with little water through meat mincer to pellets (3 mm), and then air dried. The basal diet No.1 was considered as a control. Composition and chemical analysis of the basal and experimental diets are presented in Tables (1 - 3). The composition of the vitamins and minerals mixture is presented in Table (4). Experimental Procedure: The experiment continued for 16 weeks. During the experimental period, the fish were fed the experimental diets at a rate of 3% of the live body weight daily. The diet was introduced twice daily, at 8 a.m. and 2 p.m. The amount of food was adjusted weekly based on the actual body weight changes. Samples of water were taken daily before changing the water and after adding the diets weekly from each aquarium to determine water quality parameters. Light was controlled by a timer to provide a 14h light: 10h dark as a daily photoperiod. Analytical Methods: Samples of water from each aquarium were taken to determine the water temperature, pH value, and dissolved oxygen concentrations according to Abdelhamid (1996). Water temperature in degree centigrade was recorded every day by using a thermometer. The pH value of water was measured daily using an electric digital Jenway Ltd, model 350-pH meter. Dissolved oxygen concentration was determined weekly using an oxygen meter model (d-5509). Determinations of DM, CP, EE, CF, ash and silica in the ingredients diets and in fish body at the start and at the end of the experiment for different groups were carried out according to the method of A.OA.C. (1990). At the end of the experiment, three fish were derived from each group (aquarium) for drying at 60ºC for 48 hours and then milled through electrical mill and kept at 4oC until analysis. Heavy metals determination was carried out using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (Germany Company).
  
Table (1): Composition (%) and chemical analysis (% dry matter bases) of the experimental diets No. 1 - 5.
Diet No.5
 
Diet No.4
 
Diet No. 3
 
Diet No.2
 
Diet No. 1
 
Ingredients
Duckweeds
(100%)
Duckweeds
(75%)
Duckweeds
(50%)
Duckweeds
(25%)
Control
-
1.50
3
4.50
6
Fish meal
6
4.50
3
1.50
0
Duckweeds
46.50
45.65
44.10
42.50
41
Soybean meal
30
30
30
30
30
Yellow corn
8
8
8
8
8
Wheat bran
4.50
5.35
6.90
8.50
10
Rice bran
3
3
3
3
3
Sunflower oil
2
2
2
2
2
Vitamins & minerals
Chemical analysis
90.82
90.49
90.51
89.30
90.09
Dry matter (DM)
26.32
27.96
26.34
26.29
27.19
Crude protein (CP)
5.05
4.99
5.12
5.10
4.91
Ether extract (EE)
9.42
9.22
9.56
9.17
8.64
Ash
5.12
4.78
4.20
4.12
4.09
Crude fiber (CF)
54.09
53.05
54.78
55.32
55.17
Nitrogen free extract (NFE)
418.41
418.87
422.07
423.77
 
426.44
Gross energy (GE)* (kcal/100 g DM)
62.90
66.75
62.40
62.03
63.76
Protein/energy (P/E) ratio (mg CP/kcal GE)
370.29
373.12
373.64
375.47
377.28
Metabolically energy (ME)** (kcal/100g)
 
*GE (kcal/100 g DM) = CP x 5.64 + EE x 9.44 + NFE x 4.11   calculated according to (Macdonald et al., 1973)
**ME (kcal/100g DM) = Metabolically energy was calculated by using factors 3.49, 8.1 and 4.5 kcal/g for carbohydrates, fat and protein, respectively according to Pantha (1982).
 
Table (2): Composition (%) and chemical analysis (% dry matter bases) of the experimental diets No. 1 and 6 - 9.
Diet No. 9
 
Diet No. 8
 
Diet No. 7
 
Diet No. 6
 
Diet No. 1
 
Ingredients
Crayfish meal
(100%)
Crayfish meal
(75%)
Crayfish   meal
(50%)
Crayfish meal
(25%)
Control
-
1.50
3
4.50
6
Fish meal
6
4.50
3
1.50
0
Crayfish meal
 
47
44.50
44
42.50
41
Soybean meal
30
30
30
30
30
Yellow corn
8
8
8
8
8
Wheat bran
4.00
6.50
7
8. 50
10
Rice bran
3
3
3
3
3
Sunflower oil
2
2
2
2
2
Vitamins & minerals
 
Chemical analysis
89.72
90.77
90.61
89.86
90.09
Dry matter (DM)
26.36
26.32
27.29
27.24
27.19
Crude protein (CP)
4.95
4.90
5.09
5.15
4.91
Ether extract (EE)
10.65
10.48
9.97
9.97
8.64
Ash
4.17
4.04
4.16
4.11
4.09
Crude fiber (CF)
53.87
54.26
53.49
53.53
55.17
Nitrogen free extract (NFE)
416.39
417.69
421.79
422.24
426.44
Gross energy (GE)* (kcal/100 g DM)
63.30
63.10
64.70
64.51
63.76
Protein/energy (P/E) ratio (mg CP/kcal GE)
368.80
369.74
372.63
373.05
377.28
Metabolizable energy (ME)** (kcal/100g)
               
 
*GE (kcal/100 g DM) = CP x 5.64 + EE x 9.44 + NFE x 4.11   calculated according to (Macdonald et al., 1973)
**ME (kcal/100g DM) = Metabolizable energy was calculated by using factors 3.49, 8.1 and 4.5 kcal/g for carbohydrates, fat and protein, respectively according to Pantha (1982). 
Table (3).Composition (%) and chemical analysis (%dry matter bases) of the experimental diets No. 1 and 10 - 13.
Diet No. 13
 
Diet No. 12
 
Diet No. 11
 
Diet No. 10
 
Diet No.1
 
Ingredients
Duckweeds:  Crayfish ( 1: 1 )
(100%)
Duckweeds: Crayfish ( 1: 1 )
(75%)
Duckweeds:  Crayfish ( 1: 1 )
(50%)
Duckweeds:  Crayfish ( 1: 1 )
(25%)
Control
-
1.50
3
4.50
6
Fish meal
6
4.50
3
1.50
0
Duckweeds
:
Crayfish ( 1: 1 )
46.50
45.12
43.75
42.38
41
Soybean meal
30
30
30
30
30
Yellow corn
8
8
8
8
8
Wheat bran
4.50
5.88
7.25
8.62
10
Rice bran
3
3
3
3
3
Sunflower oil
2
2
2
2
2
Vitamins & minerals
Chemical analysis
89.43
90.96
90.46
91.89
90.09
Dry matter (DM)
27.19
26.39
27.22
26.34
27.19
Crude protein (CP)
5.01
5.17
4.92
5.22
4.91
Ether extract (EE)
9.71
9.63
9.45
8.99
8.64
Ash
4.55
4.61
4.51
4.32
4.09
Crude fiber (CF)
53.54
54.20
53.90
55.13
55.17
Nitrogen free extract (NFE)
420.68
420.39
421.48
423.82
426.44
Gross energy (GE)* (kcal/100 g DM)
64.63
62.77
64.58
62.14
63.76
Protein/energy (P/E) ratio (mg CP/kcal GE)
371.37
372
372.55
375.81
377.28
Metabolically energy (ME)** (kcal/100g)
             
 
*GE (kcal/100 g DM) = CP x 5.64 + EE x 9.44 + NFE x 4.11   calculated according to (Macdonald et al., 1973)
**ME (kcal/100g DM) = Metabolizable energy was calculated by using factors 3.49, 8.1 and 4.5 kcal/g for carbohydrates, fat and protein, respectively according to Pantha (1982).
Table (4): Composition of the vitamins and minerals mixture (Mixtor Company,  calculated for each kg of the mixture) in the diet.
Vitamins:
A
5.714.286 IU
D3
85.714 IU
E
7.143 mg
K3
1.429 mg
B1
571 mg
B2
343 mg
B6
571 mg
B12
7.143 ug
C
857 ug
Biotin
2.857 mg
Folic acid
86 mg
Pantothenic acid
1.143 mg
Minerals:
Phosphorus
28.571 mg
Manganese
68.571 mg
Zinc
51.429 mg
Iron
34.286 mg
Copper
5.714 mg
Cobalt
229 mg
Selenium
286 mg
Iodine
114 mg
Inert essential agent:
Starch
57 g
Natural. H.
29 g
CaCo3
Up to 1000 g
 
 Growth Performance and Efficiency of Feed and Protein Utilization: The growth performance and feed utilization parameters were calculated according to the following equations: Average weight gain (AWG):  AWG ( g/fish ) = Average final weight (g)-Average initial weight (g). Average daily gain (ADG): ADG (g/fish) = Average final weight (g)-Average initial weight (g) / Time (days). Survival rate (SR %): SR= Total number of fish at the end of the experiment×100/total number of fish at the start of the experiment. Relative growth rate (RGR): RGR = Average weight gain (g) / Average initial weight (g). Specific growth rate (SGR, % / day): SGR = 100 [ln wt1- ln wto/T]. Where: ln: Natural log. Wto: Initial weight (g), Wt1: Final weight (g), and T: Time in days. Feed conversion ratio (FCR): FCR = Total feed consumption (g)/ Weight gain (g). Protein efficiency ratio (PER): PER = Body weight gain (g)/protein intake (g). Protein productive value (PPV %): PPV% = 100 [Retained protein (g)/protein intake (g)]. Energy retention (ER %): ER % = 100 [Retained energy (Kcal) / Energy intake (Kcal). Blood Analysis: Blood samples were withdrawn for hematological and biochemical determination in a pathological Lab. Microbiological Examination: For microbiological test, samples were taken in sterilized test tubes then prepared for total bacterial count according to AOAC (1990) and kindly examined by Dr. Manal I. EL-Barbary from the Aquatic Pathology Lab., National Institute of Oceanography and fisheries. Statistical Analysis: The data were statistically analyzed by using general linear models procedure adapted by SAS (1996) for users guide. Means were separated using Duncan's multiple range test (Duncan, 1955).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Chemical Composition of the Experimental Diets: The chemical analysis of both tested substitute unconventional materials crayfish (CrFi) and duckweed (DW) is illustrated in Table (5), from which it is obvious that DW contained more crude protein (CP), crude fiber (CF), ether extract (EE) and cadmium (Cd) contents, but lower nitrogen free extract (NFE), ash, lead and silica contents than CrFi, on dry matter (DM) basis.  In this respect, Hassan and Edwards (1992) reported that DW (Lemna perpusilla) contained 25.3% CP, 4.5% crude fat, .6% CF and 17.6% ash on dry matter basis.  Therefore, DW is used as a protein feedstuff in fish diets (Schneider et al., 2004 and BMO, 2009). Also, Tharwat (2000) analyzed the entire body of CrFi (Procambarus clarkii) and found that it contained 62.2% CP, 6.1% EE and 27.0 ash which is more proteinious than shrimp meal and local fish meal.  Moreover, Eweedah et al. (2006) and Abd El-Rahman and Badrawy (2007) reported the chemical composition of the freshwater crayfish meal on DM basis as 32.1% CP, 1.9% EE and 33.9 ash.  So, CrFi was evaluated as a protein source in fish diets. Habib (2004) cited that crayfish contain lead and cadmium as 1.82 - 2.41 and 0.06 - 0.70 mg/g dry weight of the external skeleton but 0.28 - 0.49 and 0.02 - 0.03 mg/g dry weight of the muscles when their rearing water contains 0.08 - 0.10 ppm Pb and 0.01 - 0.40 ppm Cd.  However, freshwater crayfish included 1.95 mg/g Pb and 6.37 mg/g Cd.
Table (6) presents data of chemical analysis of the tested diets.  Their analysis of variance (ANOVA) reflects significant differences among the experimental diets concerning DM, CP, EE, CF and ash contents.  Diet No. 13 (100% replacement of fishmeal with DW + CrFi, 1:1) contained the highest CP%.  Increasing DW replacement level up to 75% or CrFi up to 50% led to significantly higher CP content than the other replacement levels (except diet No. 13) and the control (diet No. 1).  Increasing CrFi replacement level from 25 to 100% gradually decreased EE% of the diets No. 6 - 9.  Increasing DW from 25 to 100% replacement in diets No. 2 - 5 increased their CF%.  Diets No. 6 - 9 had the highest ash % in gradual increase in proportion to the CrFi inclusion level.  These variations are mainly due to the variations between CrFi and DW analyses (Table 5).
 
Table (5): Chemical analysis of crayfish (Cr Fi) and Duckweeds (DW), %dray matter basis.
Duckweeds
Crayfish
Item
 
8.70
18.50
DM
43.13
34.13
CP
8.56
----
CF
5.28
2.79
EE
27.05
30.79
NFE
15.98
32.29
Ash
42
45.5
Lead, mg/kg
229.5
178.5
Cadmium, mg/kg
202.30
227.75
Silica, mg/kg
 
Table (6): Means*(± SE) of diets chemical composition of the experimental diets.
    
Proximate analysis , %DM basis
 
DM %
 
Treatments
Ash
CF
EE
CP
8.64±0.00h
4.10±0.02e
4.92±0.02de
27.19±0.02b
90.06±0.01e
Control
9.17 ±0.00gf
4.12±0.02e
5.10±0.00abcde
26.29±0.01c
89.29±0.05g
Duckweeds (25%)
9.55±0.04cd
4.21±0.01ed
5.12±0.01abcd
26.34±0.01c
90.51±0.1d
Duckweeds (50%)
9.23±0.07efg
4.78±0.01b
4.99±0.01bcde
27.27±0.02ab
90.49±0.05d
Duckweeds   (75%)
9.43±0.02efd
5.12±0.02a
5.05±0.02abcde
26.32±0.00c
90.82±0.02bc
Duckweeds (100%)
9.97±0.01b
4.12±0.05e
5.16±0.02abc
27.25±0.01b
89.85±0.02ef
Cray fish    (25%)
9.97±0.01b
4.16±0.01ed
5.10±0.04abcde
27.29±0.00ab
90.61±0.02cd
Cray fish   (50%)
10.48±0.02a
4.04±0.12e
4.90±0.02e
26.32±0.00c
90.77±0.03bc
Cray fish   (75%)
10.66±0.00a
4.17±0.01ed
4.95±0.01cde
26.36±0.01c
89.72±0.03f
Cray fish   (100%)
8.99±0.02g
4.32±0.08d
5.22±0.00a
26.27±0.00c
91.89±0.01a
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  25%
9.45±0.05ecd
4.51±0.05c
4.92±0.08de
27.22±0.01b
90.46±0.02d
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  50%
9.63±0.04cd
4.61±0.02bc
5.17±0.01ab
26.39±0.02c
90.96±0.02b
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  75%
9.72±0.003bc
4.55±0.02c
5.00±0.02bcde
27.46±0.01a
89.32±0.02g
Mixed (DW+CrFi) 100%
*Means (in the same column) superscripted with different letters significantly  (P≤0.05) differ.
  
Physico - Chemical Parameters of Water Quality: Fish rearing water was analyzed periodically for some water quality criteria (Table 7) including temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen (DO).  However, there was no effect on these parameters of different experimental diets, whether of substitute commodities or their replacement levels.  However, the ranges of these criteria (25.5 - 26.3oC, 7.12 - 7.70 pH value, and 5.90 - 6.10 mg/l DO) are suitable for rearing Nile tilapia fish (Abdelhamid, 1994, 1996 and 2009).
 
 
Treatments
 
Parameters
Mixed (DW+ CrFi )
Cray fish (CrFi)
Duckweeds (DW)
Control
50%
25%
100%
75%
50%
25%
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
 
 
25.6-25.7
25.6-25.7
25.6-25.7
25.6-25.6
25.6-25.6
25.6-25.7
25.5-
26.2
26.2-26.3
26.1-26.2
26.1-26.2
26.1-
26.2
Temperature                                   ºC
 
 
7.14-
7.36
7.12-7.21
7.20-7.74
7.10-
7.27
7.38-
7.39
7.46-
7.55
7.38-
7.40
7.46-7.53
7.45-7.46
7.42-7.75
7.53-
7.75
 
PH value
 
 
6.05-
6.05
6.05-6.10
6.05-6.05
6.05-6.05
6.05-6.05
6.05-6.05
5.90-5.90
5.90-5.90
5.95-5.95
6.05-6.05
6.05-
6.05
DO, mg/l
 
 
 
 
Table (7): Ranges of some important measured physico-chemical parameters of water quality.

 
Fish Growth Performance: The world cultured fish production had been increased from < 1 million ton in the 1950s to 51.7 million tons (47% of the total world fish production) in 2006.  Egypt produced 1.08 million ton, from which 65% are coming from aquaculture. Kafr El-Sheikh governorate alone produces ca. 40% of the local fish production and 5% of the world tilapia production (Al-Shoraky, 2009).  So, Kafr El-Sheikh governorate became a leader in the field of exporting tilapia to the Arab and African countries (Ibrahim, 2009). Many Egyptian fish producers lost money and decided to leave the fish production sector for the increasing prices of the aqua feeds throughout the last 2 years (Radwan, 2009).  Yet, Kafr El-Sheikh has many potentialities for fish production (Al-Seretty and Abdel-Hafez, 2009).  To increase and sustain fish production, nutritionists may give concern to offer alternative feed stuffs, thus the present study deal with this concept. Although there were no significant differences for initial bodyweight (IW) among the experimental fish groups (Table 8); yet, the other growth performance parameters including final bodyweight (FW), average weight gain (AWG) and average daily gain (ADW) show significant variations due to the dietary treatments (Table 8).  Since the heaviest FW, AWG and ADG were realized by diet No. 11 (50% replacement by 1:1 DW + CrFi) followed by diet No. 6 (25% CrFi).  This may be due to the chemical composition of both commodities used herein as novel protein sources to replace fish meal in the control diet No. 1, i.e. high CF, EE, and Cd levels in DW as well as high inclusion levels of ash, lead (Pb) and silica of CrFi.  These may affect feed intake (Table 10) as well as nutrients digestibility which reflected also on nutrients utilization in form of protein efficiency ratio (PER, Table 10). Specific growth rates (SGR) and survival rates (SR) did not differ significantly by the dietary treatments (Table 9); yet, relative growth rate (RGR) differed significantly among fish groups (Table 9), being the highest for diets No. 11 and 6, respectively.
 
However, Hassan and Edwards (1992) working on Nile tilapia found that the optimal daily feeding rates of Lemna were 5, 4 and 3% of the total fish body weight on a duckweed - dry - weight basis for fish of 25 - 44 g, 45 - 74 g and 75 - 105 g in weight, respectively.  Since DW has potential as fish food in the development of low-cost aquaculture systems in the tropics; yet, it must be fed not more than 4% of the fish body weight daily to avoid its negative effects on the fish weight gain and survival.  Moreover, Eid et al. (1995) reported that 2.5% inclusion level of DW of the Nile tilapia fish diet showed the highest body weight gain, absolute growth rate, and SGR.  Additionally, Fasakin et al. (1999) did not find differences (P ³ 0.05) in growth performance of Nile tilapia fish fed on diets containing up to 20% duckweed inclusion and the control. It was noticed that 30% fermented Lemna leaf meal incorporated in the diet resulted in the best growth performance of the fish superior to those fed diets containing raw leaf meal (Bairagi et al., 2002). However, El-Shafai et al. (2004b) and Schneider et al. (2004) found that more than 20% DW in the diet resulted in lower growth, although tilapia fish have the potency to digest and metabolize green food (Bakeer, 2006), but it may be due to its inclusion of high levels of trace metals, since such aquatic plants are able to significantly reduce the pollution load of the aquaculture wastewater by accumulating it in their tissues (Snow and Ghaly, 2008). Generally, developing alternate protein sources for fish feeds which support rapid fish growth but do not increase pollution from aquaculture will require the combined efforts of all of the major scientific disciplines that collectively constitute aquaculture (Hardy, 1999).  Feeding tilapia fish on diets supplemented with chitin and chitosan depresses tilapia growth regardless of the supplementation level (Shiau and Yu, 1999).  This may interpretate the CrFi effect on fish performance recorded herein.  Recently, Eweedah et al. (2006) reported that including crayfish meal in the diet caused a decrease in growth parameters but crayfish silage at a level of 33% did not decrease AWG, ADG or SGR.
Table ( 8 ): Effect of dietary treatments on growth performance parameters of  Nile tilapia.
ADG,
g / fish
AWG,
g / fish
F W,
g / fish
I W,
g / fish
Treatments
0.13±0.00ab
14.78±0.04ab
21.92±0.05b
7.14±0.00a
Control
0.08±0.00ef
9.91±0.17ef
18.16±0.11d
7.07±0.04a
Duckweeds (25%)
0.08±0.00f
9.62±0.86f
18.37±0.16d
7.28±0.00a
Duckweeds (50%)
0.10±0.00de
11.90±0.77cde
20.44±0.11c
7.14±0.09a
Duckweeds   (75%)
0.09±0.00ef
11.07±0.04def
18.28±0.00d
7.21±0.04a
Duckweeds (100%)
0.13±0.00ab
15.11±0.92ab
23.63±0.15a
7.07±0.04a
Cray fish    (25%)
0.12±0.00bc
14.21±0.04ab
21.42±0.00b
7.21±0.04a
Cray fish   (50%)
0.11±0.00cd
13.07±0.04bcd
20.14±0.09c
7.07±0.04a
Cray fish   (75%)
0.11±0.00cd
12.99±0.10bcd
20.14±0.00c
7.14±0.09a
Cray fish   (100%)
0.11±0.00cd
13.35±0.04bc
20.66±0.06c
7.21±0.04a
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  25%
0.14±0.00a
16.35±0.04a
23.64±0.04a
7.28±0.00a
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  50%
0.08±0.00ef
10.07±0.75ef
18.57±0.30d
7.07±0.04a
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  75%
0.13±0.00ab
14.66±0.09ab
21.71±0.00b
7.14±0.00a
Mixed (DW+CrFi) 100%
*Means (in the same column) superscripted with different letters significantly (P≤0.05) differ.
 
Table ( 9): Effect of dietary treatments on growth rates and survival rate by  Nile tilapia.      
SR%
SGR,
%/d
RGR
Treatments
100.00±0.00a
0.54±0.00a
2.06±0.00abc
Control
85.71±0.00a
0.63±0.00a
1.40±0.03g
Duckweeds (25%)
85.71±10.10a
0.65±0.07a
1.32±0.12g
Duckweeds (50%)
85.71±10.10a
0.64±0.07a
1.66±0.08def
Duckweeds   (75%)
100.00±0.00a
0.54±0.00a
1.53±0.01efg
Duckweeds (100%)
85.71±10.10a
0.65±0.07a
2.13±0.14ab
Cray fish    (25%)
100.00±0.00a
0.54±0.00a
1.97±0.02abcd
Cray fish   (50%)
100.00±0.00a
0.54±0.00a
1.84±0.00bcde
Cray fish   (75%)
100.00±0.00a
0.54±0.00a
1.80±0.02cde
Cray fish   (100%)
100.00±0.00a
0.54±0.00a
1.84±0.01bcde
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  25%
100.00±0.00a
0.54±0.00a
2.24±0.00a
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  50%
85.71±10.10a
0.65±0.07a
1.42±0.11fg
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  75%
100.00±0.00a
0.54±0.00a
2.04±0.00abc
Mixed (DW+CrFi) 100%
*Means (in the same column) superscripted with different letters significantly  (P≤0.05) differ.
Feed and Nutrients Utilizations: Table (10) present data of feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), dietary protein intake (PI), protein productive value (PPV), protein efficiency ratio (PER), and energy retention (ER).  The ANOVA of these data presented significant effects of the dietary treatments on FI, FCR, PI, PPV, PER and ER.  The diet No. 6 (25% CrFi replacement) was responsible for significantly the highest FI and PI while the worst was the diet No. 12 (75% replacement 1:1 DW + CrFi).  The best feed conversion was obtained with mixed DW + CrFi at 50% replacement level (diet No. 11, which led to best AWG and ADW (Table 8)), while the worst was the diet No. 3 (50% DW replacement, led to the lowest AWG and ADW as shown from Table 10).  The best protein utilization expressed as PPV and PER was realized with the diet No. 13 (100% replacement by mixed DW + CrFi, 1:1, due to its highest CP content, Table 7); yet, diet No. 5 (100% DW replacement) was the best in ER.  This may be due to high energy content or low ash of DW (Table 1).  In these concerns, Hassan and Edwards (1992) registered lower feed conversion by increasing DW level for in Nile tilapia diets.  However, Eid et al. (1995) reported best digestion by fish fed on 2.5% DW level.  Also, Fasakin et al. (1999) did not find significant differences in nutrient utilization of fish fed on diets containing up to 20% DW inclusion and the control.  Yet, Bairagi et al. (2002) reported that feed utilization efficiencies of fish fed fermented leaf meal containing diets were superior to those fed diets containing raw leaf meal. It is worth mentioned that unionized ammonia nitrogen (UIAN) concentration must be maintained below 0.1 mg/l to avoid chronic ammonia toxicity to duckweed-fed tilapia, which increased FCR and reduced PER.  Since DW grown on domestic sewage increases water UIAN (El-Shafai et al., 2004a).  Moreover, ammonia excretion rate increases with a decline in protein quality (Eid and Matty, 1989).  Yet, Ruenglertpanyakul et al. (2004) mentioned that DW could efficiently remove nutrients in the effluent, especially ammonia, which seemed to be the preferred nitrogen sauce of the plant.  However, Abdel-Aziz and El-Shafai (2004) concluded that DW could be used in intensive tilapia culture either as partial substitute of fishmeal or complete substitute of some plant ingredients.  DW provided good values for FCR (0.98 - 1.1), PER (2.49 - 2.78), CP digestibility (78 - 92%) and energy digestibility (78.1 - 90.7%). Anyhow, Nile tilapia fish reflect digestibility of energy and protein in duckweed as 7.81 - 10.7% and 88.4 - 93.% (El-Shafai et al., 2004 a and b) and an crayfish meal being 88.8 and 68.4% (Boscolo et al., 2004), respectively.  DW reflected a high N-retention (Schneider et al., 2004).  Tilapias are capable to digest and metabolize algae (Bakeer, 2006). Eweedah et al. (2006) reported that CrFi can be used successfully up to 33% replacement of fishmeal of the Nile tilapia diets to reduce the feeding cost without a significant decrease in growth performance.  Also, 50% crayfish meal diet reflected comparable FCR (Abd El-Rahman and Badrawy, 2007).  However, Snow and Ghaly (2008) found that aquatic plants did not contain sufficient amounts of protein and fat to meet the dietary requirements of fish.  They also contain high minerals concentrate, which can lead to reduce feed intake, weight gain and growth rate in fish.
 
Table (10): Means ± standard errors of feed intake, feed conversion ratio, protein intake, protein productive value (PPV), protein efficiency ratio (PER) and energy retention (ER) of the tested Nile tilapia fingerlings as affected by dietary treatments.                    
   E R%
PER
PPV%
Protein
Intake, g/fish
FCR
Feed Intake
g/fish
Treatments
12.13
±0.08ed
1.23
±0.00ab
17.26
±0.03e
11.99
±0.06ab
2.98
±0.00cd
44.13
±0.24abc
Control
12.86
±0.02cde
1.01
±0.01cd
18.66
±0.06cde
9.78
±0.06de
3.75
±0.04ab
37.22
±0.24ef
Duckweeds (25%)
13.42
±0.25bcd
0.94
±0.07d
17.83
±0.32de
10.21
±0.07d
4.09
±0.33a
38.78
±0.27e
Duckweeds (50%)
15.71
±0.24ab
1.03
±0.06bcd
19.87
±0.28bc
11.47
±0.06bc
3.56
±0.21abc
42.12
±0.22cd
Duckweeds   (75%)
15.95
±0.41a
1.14
±0.02abcd
21.08
±0.55ab
9.71
±0.27de
3.33
±0.07bcd
36.91
±1.03ef
Duckweeds (100%)
12.95
±0.10cde
1.21
±0.06abc
19.22
±0.18cd
12.48
±0.04a
3.05
±0.16bcd
45.81
±0.12a
Cray fish    (25%)
11.97
±0.03de
1.16
±0.00abc
17.33
±0.07e
12.26
±0.07a
3.16
±0.00bcd
44.95
±0.26ab
Cray fish   (50%)
12.82
±0.42cde
1.17
±0.03abc
18.66
±0.59cde
11.20
±0.41c
3.25
±0.10bcd
42.57
±1.57bcd
Cray fish   (75%)
10.56
±0.07ef
1.20
±0.01abc
15.29
±0.07f
10.85
±0.00c
3.17
±0.02bcd
41.22
±0.03d
Cray fish   (100%)
8.71
±0.07f
1.21
±0.00abc
13.32
±0.12g
11.00
±0.07c
3.12
±0.01bcd
41.77
±0.28cd
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  25%
13.52
±07bcd
1.32
±0.00a
19.14
±0.10cd
12.32
±0.03a
2.76
±0.01d
45.29
±0.11a
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  50%
15.23
±1.65abc
1.07
±0.07bcd
18.98
±0.70cd
9.39
±0.04e
3.57
±0.25abc
35.61
±0.13f
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  75%
12.84
±0.03cde
1.30
±0.00a
21.63
±0.31a
11.24
±0.04c
2.81
±0.00d
41.33
±0.10d
Mixed (DW+CrFi) 100%
*Means (in the same column) superscripted with different letters significantly (P≤0.05) differ.
 
Blood Analysis: Data of blood hematological and biochemical analyses in tilapia fish as affected by the dietary treatments are given in Table (11).  Diet No. 6 reflected the highest Hb and PCV values as well as total protein and globulin.  While, diet No. 4 gave the lowest values of Hb, PCV, total protein, albumin and globulin.  Hepatic function in terms of AST and ALT activities was highest with diet No. 5 and lowest with diet No. 7.  Also, kidney function in terms of urea, uric acid and creatinine concentrations was highest with diet No. 5.  This means that 75% duckweed replacing fish meal in tilapia diets reduced the hematological parameters measured as well as blood total protein and globulin and 100% DW diet led to dysfunctions of both liver and kidney.  Yet, 25% CrFi improved (duplicated) the hematological parameters and total protein (and globulin) to be better than the control.  Moreover, 50% CrFi also led to hepatic dysfunction through lowering the activity of both enzymes AST and ALT to be half that of the control.  The negative effects of both substitutes may be attributed to their high content of Pb, Cd, and silica (Tables 15 and 16), as well as the level of CF and/or ash of these diets (Tables 1 - 3).  The blood parameters are harmonized also with growth performance parameters (Tables 8 and 9) and feed and nutrients utilization by the fish (Table 10). However, disturbing liver function be caused by hepatitis and/or liver injure, and kidney dysfunction may be occurred by kidney disease, hemolysis, and/or hypoproteinemia (Merck, 1974).  Moreover, the low Hb concentration is an anemia symptom (Merck, 1976).  Increases in blood urea may occur in a number of diseases in addition to those in which the kidneys are primarily involved.  Also, the plasma creatinine increases in rend disease.  Yet, the evidence regarding the blood creatine in nephritis is conflicting.  Uric acid belongs to, and is the end product of the metabolism of, the group of substances known as the purines, some of which are present in nucleic acid found in the molecule of the nucleoproteins.  It is accordingly formed endogenously from nucleoprotein metabolism, and exogenously from the metabolism of purines taken in the food.  Uric acid estimations give little information of value to the clinician except in cases of gout.  A reduction in the total protein is one of the causes of edema.  In all conditions, there is a negative nitrogen balance due to increased protein breakdown, and increase in blood urea may be found.  A low serum albumin is found in severe liver disease and may be a factor in causing edema in liver disease. An insufficient amount of dietary protein may also lead to a low plasma albumin, with a low total protein also.  Increase in globulin occurs most commonly in advanced liver disease.  Increases in both transaminases are a common finding in liver diseases (Varley, 1978).
Table (11): Data of blood hematological and biochemical analysis of tilapia fish as affected by the dietary treatments.
 
ALT
u/l
AST
u/l
C
mg/dl
UA
mg/dl
U
mg/dl
G
g/dl
A
g/dl
P
g/dl
PCV
%
Hb
g/dl
Treatments
9.26
24.16
0.375
2.11
5.69
1.70
1.43
3.13
13.95
4.36
Control
12.91
26.13
0.338
2.52
6.76
1.34
1.17
2.51
9.37
2.93
Duckweeds (DW)  25%
13.29
27.09
0.361
2.73
7.15
1.41
1.21
2.62
9.63
3.01
Duckweeds (DW)  50%
17.62
29.06
0.475
2.77
7.74
1.31
1.13
2.44
8.83
2.76
Duckweeds(DW)  75%
19.31
31.91
0.477
2.79
8.77
1.32
1.16
2.48
8.89
2.78
Duckweeds(DW) 100%
5.89
13.38
0.362
1.56
4.47
2.05
2.51
4.56
20.99
6.56
Cray fish (CrFi)  25%
5.70
12.09
0.359
1.75
4.74
1.80
2.53
4.33
20.77
6.49
Cray fish (CrFi)  50%
8.13
21.13
0.363
1.93
5.07
1.98
2.14
4.12
18.75
5.86
Cray fish (CrFi) 75%
8.61
21.19
0.359
1.97
5.17
1.94
2.22
4.16
17.63
5.51
Cray fish (CrFi) 100%
6.13
16.02
0.329
1.66
4.36
2.00
2.01
4.01
19.62
6.13
Mixed
(DW+ CrFi)  25%
7.17
17.03
0.336
1.73
4.35
1.80
2.16
3.96
20.22
6.32
Mixed
(DW+ CrFi)  50%
8.77
22.14
0.354
2.07
5.49
2.00
1.63
3.63
16.99
5.31
Mixed
(DW+ CrFi)  75%
9.01
23.06
0.349
2.06
5.39
2.00
1.72
3.72
16.70
5.22
Mixed
(DW+ CrFi)  100%
 
 
Hb: hemoglobin, PCV: packed cell value, P: protein, A: albumin, G: globulin ,U: urea , UA: uric acid, C: creatinine, AST: aspartate amino transaminase, and ALT: alanine amino transaminase. 
 
Chemical Composition of Fish: Chemical composition of the whole fish body (Tables 12 and 13) revealed that DM, CP, and EE increased from the start to the end of the experimental period.  However, the dietary treatments affected significantly all fractions of the proximate analysis of the carcass (Table 13) as well as of the muscles (Table 14).  The highest DM% was recorded in both carcass and muscles with 100% DW diet but the lowest with 25% CrFi diet (Tables 13 and 14); yet, the highest CP% in both carcass and muscles was found with 25% CrFi diet, but the lowest with 75% DW.  Ether extract percentages were highest and lowest with 100% DW and 25% CrFi, respectively in the carcass and muscles, too.  The diets containing 75 - 100% DW reflected the lowest ash percentages and the diets containing 50% CrFi gave the highest values in both carcass and muscles. Hassan and Edwards (1992) found that increasing Lemma rates in the diet (up to 3%) increased DM, CP and EE of the fish, but higher levels led to the opposite trend.  Shiau and Yu (1999) reported that body lipid content of the fish reflects the general pattern of the lipid digestibility.  Moreover, Eweedah et al. (2006) registered decreases in DM and CP of Nile tilapia carcasses at the supplementing levels (33.3 - 100%) of either CrFi meal or silage comparing with the control. Tables 13 and 14 reflect positive relationships between EE and EC of the carcass and between moisture and protein contents as well as moisture and ash contents of both carcass and muscles, and negative relationship between moisture and EE as well as between protein and EE percentages.  These relations were confirmed before by Abdelhamid et al. (1995 a&b, 1997 b, 1998, 2002 and 2007 a & b) and El-Ebiary et al. (2004).
 
 
Table (12): Chemical composition (%dry matter basis) of the experimental fish at the start.
 
 
%
 
Composition
 
18.75
DM
40.84
CP
25.81
EE
16.21
NFE
17.14
Ash
 
Table ( 13 ): Means*( ± SE ) of chemical composition (%dry matter bases) of Nile tilapia carcass as affected by the dietary treatments.
Proximate analysis
 
DM %
 
 
Treatments
EC, kcal /100g
Ash
EE
CP
568.66±2.07a
21.14±0.15bc
29.58±0.02g
51.26±0.39abc
23.23±0.00h
Control
584.09±3.63a
17.36±0.42e
32.17±0.01d
49.71±0.62bcde
26.20±0.06d
Duckweeds (25%)
576.59±1.73a
15.42±0.12f
32.30±0.01c
48.17±0.34de
26.96±0.01c
Duckweeds (50%)
578.12±2.57a
15.02±0.02f
32.60±0.03b
47.94±0.41e
28.83±0.02a
Duckweeds   (75%)
588.33±4.15a
14.72±0.08f
32.88±0.02a
49.28±0.72cde
28.86±0.04a
Duckweeds (100%)
567.10±2.52a
20.90±0.15bc
28.22±0.01k
53.32±0.42a
23.36±0.02h
Cray fish    (25%)
571.42±2.19a
21.56±0.66ab
29.19±0.02i
52.47±0.42ab
23.63±0.06g
Cray fish   (50%)
554.80±9.31a
22.74±0.38a
29.31±0.01h
51.12±0.63abc
25.48±0.03e
Cray fish   (75%)
546.15±15.38a
21.19±0.13bc
29.70±0.02i
51.43±0.36abc
21.17±0.02i
Cray fish   (100%)
565.05±3.67a
21.56±0.29ab
28.70±0.01j
52.15±0.63ab
18.70±0.06j
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  25%
550.34±7.83a
20.69±0.08bcd
29.20±0.00f
50.70±0.44abcd
24.34±0.02f
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  50%
579.02±1.18a
19.78±0.02cd
31.13±0.00f
50.56±0.19abcde
24.40±0.02f
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  75%
583.03±0.62a
19.34±0.11d
31.05±0.02b
50.87±0.44abcd
27.35±0.03b
Mixed (DW+CrFi) 100%
*Means (in the same column) superscripted with different letters significantly (P≤0.05) differ.
Table ( 14 ): Means*( ± SE ) of  muscles chemical composition (%dry matter bases) of Nile tilapia fed on the experimental diets.
Proximate analysis
 
DM %
 
 
Treatments
Ash
EE
CP
18.55±0.02c
17.22±0.02g
61.17±0.01b
12.41±0.06b
Control
16.71±0.05g
23.01±0.08c
58.52±0.02h
13.17±0.03a
Duckweeds (25%)
16.28±0.01h
25.32±0.01b
56.69±0.06j
13.23±0.04a
Duckweeds (50%)
15.12±0.02i
26.80±0.03a
56.09±0.02k
13.25±0.03a
Duckweeds   (75%)
15.14±0.02i
26.97±0.22a
54.30±0.00l
13.27±0.04a
Duckweeds (100%)
18.82±0.05ab
16.64±0.19h
61.85±0.01a
11.76±0.46bc
Cray fish    (25%)
18.91±0.05a
16.54±0.02h
61.05±0.02bc
12.04±0.02bc
Cray fish   (50%)
18.62±0.03c
16.75±0.02h
60.96±0.03c
12.15±0.03bc
Cray fish   (75%)
18.73±0.04abc
18.75±0.03f
60.02±0.03e
12.25±0.03bc
Cray fish   (100%)
18.20±0.01d
21.02±0.01e
60.18±0.01d
11.48±0.11c
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  25%
18.66±0.01bc
21.65±0.00d
59.19±0.02f
12.13±0.04bc
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  50%
17.86±0.02e
23.36±0.01c
58.68±0.01g
12.30±0.02b
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  75%
17.50±0.05f
25.52±0.01b
57.05±0.02i
12.23±0.02bc
Mixed (DW+CrFi) 100%
*Means (in the same column) superscripted with different letters significantly  (P≤0.05) differ.
Silica contents (mg/kg) of diets and fish are presented in Table (15).  Diet No. 2 contained the lowest content, thus led to the lowest silica content in the fish carcass.  Yet, the highest dietary silica content and fish carcass content were found in diet No. 9 and with diet No. 13, respectively. Table (16) presents lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) contents of both diets and fish carcasses.  The highest dietary Pb content was found in diet No. 9, and the lowest in diets No. 2 and 10.  Yet, the lowest Pb content of fish was registered with diet No. 2, but the highest with diets No. 7 and 13.  However, the highest Cd level was found in diets No. 8, 9, 11 and 13, but the lowest was in the control diet No. 1; yet, the highest fish Cd level was given with diet No. 13, and the lowest with diets No. 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7. However, many heavy metals are frequently occurred in Egyptian water, earth, plants and animals including fish, whether of freshwater or saltwater, and differ in their concentrations from species to another species of fish, and from season to other as well as from location to other (Abdelhamid 1988 and 1999; Abdelahmid et al., 1992, 1997 a, 2000, 2006 a & 2007 a and El-Gawady, 2002). Recently, Abd El-Rahman and Badrawy (2007) reported the lowest Pb and Cd levels in Nile tilapia fed on 50% replacement of fish meal with crayfish meal comparing with the control. Moreover, they reported that the concentrations of Cd and Pb in edible muscle of different freshwater fish of Egypt are often above the maximum permissible limits according to FAO standards.  The child intake of fish with these levels is generally above the maximum allowable concentrations, which means human health risk with current Egyptian dietary intakes of fish.
 
Table ( 15): Silica contents of the experimental diets and fish.
Silica in diets, mg/kg
Silica in fish, mg/kg
Treatments
5.751
4.751
Control
2.347
2.347
Duckweeds (DW)  25%
3.407
2.398
Duckweeds (DW)  50%
4.596
2.555
Duckweeds (DW)  75%
7.406
2.445
Duckweeds (DW) 100%
4.750
2.445
Cray fish (CrFi)  25%
2.398
2.449
Cray fish (CrFi)  50%
7.407
4.407
Cray fish (CrFi)  75%
9.046
4.556
Cray fish (CrFi)  100%
4.597
2.398
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  25%
4.597
2.445
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  50%
4.751
4.568
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  75%
7.457
7.407
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  100%
 
 
Table ( 16 ): Lead and cadmium contents of the experimental diets and fish.
 
 
Diet
Fish
 
Treatments
Cadmium mg/kg
Lead mg/kg
Cadmium mg/kg
Lead, mg/kg
25.5
20.5
25.5
20.5
 
Control
51.0
17.5
25.5
14.0
 
Duckweeds (DW)  25%
67.5
24.5
51.0
17.5
 
Duckweeds (DW)  50%
76.5
24.5
76.5
24.5
 
Duckweeds (DW)  75%
102
28.0
25.5
24.5
 
Duckweeds (DW) 100%
25.5
24.5
25.5
28.0
 
Cray fish (CrFi)  25%
51.0
28.0
25.5
31.5
 
Cray fish (CrFi)  50%
127.5
24.5
51.0
28.0
 
Cray fish (CrFi)  75%
127.5
31.5
102
28.0
 
Cray fish (CrFi)  100%
102
17.5
76.5
17.5
 
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  25%
127.5
21.0
76.5
21.0
 
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  50%
102
21.0
76.5
28.0
 
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  75%
127.5
24.5
127.5
31.5
 
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  100%
 
Microbiological test: Throughout the course of the experiment, the 25 and 50% DW diets led to changes in water quality, i.e. dark silver color with off smell.  This led to carrying out the total count of microorganisms (Table 17).  Yet, there no critical counts, whether in water, diet and fish tissues.  Also, there were no relations among the counts in water, diets, muscles and/or liver of the tested fish. El-Gawady (2002) counted up to 1.9 x 106 - 2.4 x 106 CFU/ml total aerobic bacterial in water of fish farm in winter and summer, respectively.  However, the gut and skin of O. niloticus microbial count reached 4.3 x 108 CFU/g. However, Ampofo and Clerk (2003) identified 25 species of bacteria as associated with the fish culture systems.  They also added that manuring causes organic enrichment, it may also hasten the deterioration of the water quality making the aquatic environment favorable for the growth and multiplication of human pathogenic bacteria. Moreover, Abdelhamid et al. (2006b and 2007a) registered the presence of pathogenic bacteria (1.3 - 2.0 x 105) in samples of water, feed, sediments and fish, mainly in summer season.  There was no difference between fish of natural resources and those of aquaculture concerning bacterial contamination.  Also, Abdelhamid et al. (2007b and 2008) found pathogenic bacteria (X 106 CFU) in samples of water, feed, spleen, intestinal, and liver of Nile tilapia up to 113.0, 38.7, 28.33, 23.33, and 25.00, respectively.   Shaltout et al. (2009) counted the total microbial count including fungi, yeasts and highest total bacterial counts (TBCs) as indicators for faecal pollution in Kafr El-Zayat industrial area.
Table ( 17 ): Count of microorganisms obtained on nutrient agar media.
Treatments
Microbial count (cfu*105/g or ml)
Liver
Muscles
Diet
Water
Control
5
45
-
2
Duckweeds (25%)
120
100
3
18
Duckweeds (50%)
132
98
-
1
Duckweeds   (75%)
125
35
40
-
Duckweeds (100%)
118
102
22
9
Cray fish    (25%)
135
120
41
80
Cray fish   (50%)
110
122
70
-
Cray fish   (75%)
107
125
8
9
Cray fish   (100%)
60
20
120
-
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  25%
22
120
39
-
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  50%
105
117
118
-
Mixed (DW+CrFi)  75%
102
120
42
-
Mixed (DW+CrFi) 100%
105
-
21
-
Cfu: colony forming unit
Conclusion: From the foregoing results, it would be clear that the 6th diet (25% freshwater crayfish meal as partial replacer of dietary fish meal) was significantly the best concerning fish bodyweight gain, relative growth rate, feed and protein intakes; as well as blood hemoglobin, hemotocrit, total protein, and globulin besides highest protein and lowest fat in whole fish and fish muscles.  This was followed by the 11th diet (50% substitution with mixture (1/1) of duckweed meal and freshwater crayfish meal), which was responsible for highest final body weight, bodyweight gain, daily body weight gain, and feed conversion, which may be reflected the economical diet by decreasing feed costs to produce one Kg fish bodyweight gain.  This leads to recommend the partial replacement of fish meal in Nile tilapia diets with 25% crayfish meal or 50% mixture of crayfish meal plus duckweed meal (1/1).  These diets were responsible for better results than control and it is to expect that they will reduce the costs of fish feeding and production for the lower prices of either duckweed meal or freshwater crayfish meal comparing with the very expensive price of fish meal.
 
REFERENCES
Abdel-Aziz, S. and El-Shafai, A. M. (2004). Nutrients Valorization via Duckweed - based Wastewater Treatment and Aquaculture. A. A. Balkema Publishers, Lisse, Netherlands.
Abdelhamid, A. M. (1988). Effect of dietary contamination with mercury on the performance of rabbits. Archiv für Tierernährung, 38: 207-214 (Biological Abstracts, Vol. 88, No. 10, Nov. 15, 1989).
                Abdelhamid, A.M. (1994). Scientific Fundamentals for Fish Production and Management.  An Arabic Textbook, Dar Al-Nashr for Egyptian Universities - Alwafaa Bookshop, Cairo, I.S.B.N. 977-5526-04-1, 658p (An Arabic Textbook).
Abdelhamid, A.M. (1996). Field and Laboratorial Analysis in Animal Production. Dar Annashr for   Universities, Cairo, I.S.B.N. 977-5526-47-7, 680 p. (An Arabic Textbook).      
Abdelhamid, A. M. (1999).   Pollution of fish with heavy metals and mycotoxins.  1st Forum "Water pollution, its effects on fish and its relation to human health".  Ismailia, May 5 , 4 p.                                                                                                                                                    
Abdelhamid, A.M. (2009). Fundamentals of Fish Production and Culture. New Universal Office, Alexandria, I.S.B.N. 977-438-052-5, 393 p. (An Arabic Textbook).
Abdelhamid, A. M., Abdelghaffar, A.A. and El-Kerdawy, A.A. (2000).  Towards causative interpretation of the repeatedly sudden and collective death of fish in Damietta region.  J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 25: 1947-1962.                                                                                
Abdelhamid, A. M., El-Ayoty, S. A. Topps, J. H. El-Shinnawy, M. M. Gabr, A. A.and El- Sadaney H. H. (1992). Evaluation of some unconventional and conventional feeds in Dakahlia Governorate. Arch. Anim. Nutr., 42: 371-381.                                                                
Abdelhamid, A.M., El-Fadaly, H.A. and Ibrahim, S.M. (2007-a). Studies on integrated fish/duck production system: 1- On water quality and fish production. J.  Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 32: 5225 - 5244.                                                  
Abdelhamid, A.M., El-Fadaly, H.A. and Ibrahim, S.M. (2007-b). Integrated aquaculture by bearing ducks on earthen fish ponds. Engormix.com. Aquaculture Technical Articles.                                                                        
Abdelhamid, A.M., El-Fadaly, H.A. and Ibrahim, S.M. (2008). Studies on integrated fish/duck production system: III- Microbiological concern. Egyptian J. Nutrition and Feeds, 11 (1) : 215 - 227.                                                                                                                     
 Abdelhamid, A. M., El-Kerdawy, A. A. El-Mezaein, A. A. M. and Meshref, H. A. (1997 a). Study on pollution in the western-north region of El-Manzalah Lake, Egypt. II. Heavy  metals [Iron, zinc, lead and cadmium] in water, soil, and fish. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 22: 1877-1885.
Abdelhamid, A.M., El-Sadaney, H.H., El-Shinnawy, M.M. and Dorra, T.M. (1995-a).  Effects of dietary graded levels of ascorbic acid on performance and chemical composition of tilapia fingerlings.  J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 20: 2731 - 2742.
Abdelhamid, A.M.; El-Sadaney, H.H.; El-Shinnawy, M.M. and Dorra, T.M. (1995-b).  Effects of dietary levels of crude protein, crude fat, and ascorbic acid on Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings performance. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 20: 2743 - 2766.
Abdelhamid,  A. M.,  Gawish  M.M. M. and Soryal K.A. (2006a). Comparative study between desert cultivated and natural fisheries of mullet fish in Egypt, I- concerning heavy metals . J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 31: 5665 - 5680.                                                        
 Abdelhamid, A. M., Gawish M.M. M. and Soryal K.A. (2006b). Comparative study between desert cultivated and natural fisheries of mullet fish in Egypt, II- microbiological   concern. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 31: 5681 -   5687. (The 3rd Inter. Conf. on The Environmental & Health Safety, 15-16 Nov. 2006, Mansoura Univ., Abs. Book, p:46).
Abdelhamid, A.M., Khalil F.F. and El-Barbary M. I. (1997 b). Effect of differed dietary crude protein levels supplemented with graded levels of flavomycin on growth performance of Nile tilapia fry and their utilization of different nutrients. Egypt. J. Aquat. Biol. & Fish., 1(2): 93 - 108.
Abdelhamid, A.M.; Khalil, F.F. and El-Barbary, M. I. (1998). Effect of using graded levels of gibberellic acid in diets differing in the crude protein levels on performance and chemical composition of Nile tilapia fingerlings. Egypt. J. Aquat. Biol. & Fish., 2(4): 221-233.                            
Abdelhamid, A.M.; Khalil, F.F; El-Barbary, M.I. Zaki V.H. and Husien H.S. (2002). Feeding Nile tilapia on Biogen® to detoxify aflatoxic diets. Proc. 1st Ann. Sc. Conf. Anim. & Fish Prod., Mansoura Fac. Agric., 24 & 25 Sep., pp: 207 - 230.
Abd El-Rahman, A. S. and Badrawy, N. A. (2007). Evaluation of using crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) as partial or complete replacement of fish meal protein in rearing the Nile tilapia   (Oreochromis niloticus) fry. The Inter. Arab African Fish Resources Conf. & Exhibition, EGY Fish, Cairo, 28-30 June,  p:86.  
Adeparusi, E. G. and Ajayi, A. D. ( 2000 ). Hematological characteristic of Nile tiapia ( Oreochromis niloticus ) fed differently processed lima bean diets, tilapia Aquaculture in the 21st Century. Proceeding of the Fifth International symposium on Tilapia Aquaculture, September 3-7, 1: 131-137.
Al-Seretty, S. M. and Abdel-Hafez, S. M. (2009).The potentialities of fisheries development of Kafer El-Sheikh governorate. Global Fisheries & Aquaculture Research Conference, P: 39, Cairo International Conventions Center, 24-26 Oct.                                                                                         
Al-Shoraki, A. M. (2009). Important understandings. Scientific Forum "Aquaculture Future in Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate". Kafr El-Sheikh Fish Farming Co-operative Society, Sakha, 2 June.
Ampofo, J. A. and Clerk, G. C. (2003). Diversity of bacteria in sewage treatment plant used as fish culture pond in southern Ghana. Aquaculture Research, 34 (8): 667.
A.O.A.C. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1990). Official methods of analysis. 15th Ed. Published by the A.O.A.C., Benjamin Francklin Station, Washington. D.C., USA.                                                             
Bairagi, A.; Ghosh, K. S.; Sen, S. K. and Ray, A. K. (2002).  Duckweed (Lemna polyrhiza) leaf meal as a source of feedstuff in formulating diets for rohu (Labeo rohita Ham.)    fingerlings after fermentation with a fish intestinal bacterium. Bioresource Technology, 85: 17 - 24.                                  
 Bakeer, M. N. (2006). Using blue green algae as feed for fish in pisciculture. Central Lab. for Fish Research, Abbasa -   Sharkia, Egypt.                                                                     
BMO, Business Mirror Online (2009). Duckweeds as feed supplement for fish pushed. http://www.engormix.com/e_ news_view.asp/news=14367&AREA=ACU.
Duncan, D.B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F-test. Biometrics, 11:    1-42.                                                                   
Eid, A. and Matty, A. J. (1989). Ammonia excretion rate as index for protein quality evaluation for carp diets. Istanbul Univ. J. of Aquatic Products, 3(1-2):37 - 44.
Eid, A. E.; Danasoury, M. A.; Swidan, F. Z.  and El- Sayed, K. A. (1995). Evaluation of twelve practical diets for fingerlings Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Proc. 5th Sci. Conf. Anim. Nutr., Vol. 1: 345 - 353, Ismailia, Dec.                                                                                                                
El-Ebiary, E. H.; Zaki, M. A.; and Mabrook, H. A. (2004). Evaluation of plant protein concentrates in feeding Nile tilapia fry (Oreochromis niloticus). Egypt. J. Aquat. Biol. & Fish., 8 (1): 1 - 17.                                
El-Gawady, M. M. M. (2002). Study on microbial pollution types in Manzal lake. M.Sc. Thesis, Fac. of  Agric., Mansoura Univ.
El-Sayed , A.F.M .; . Ezzat , A.A.,. Mansour ,C.R.(2005). Effects of dietary lipid source on spawning performance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) brood stock reared at different water salinities. Aquaculture, 248:187-196.                      
El-Shafai, S. A.; El-Gohary, F. A.; Nasr, F. A.; Steen, N. P.and Gijzen, H. J. (2004a). Chronic ammonia toxicity to duckweed-fed tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture, 232:1-4.                                                                
El-Shafai, S. A.; El-Gohary, F. A.; Verreth, J. A. J. ; Schrama, J. W. and Gijzen, H. J. (2004b). Apparent digestibility coefficient of duckweed (Lemna  minor), fresh and dry for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.). Aquaculture Research, 35(6).                                                                     
 Eweedah, N.M.; Abd El-Raouf, E. M.; Salem, M. F. I.; Khalafalla, M. M. E. and Abd El-Aty, B. S. (2006). Replacement of fishmeal by freshwater crayfish meal (Procambarus clarkii) in practical diets for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus. Egypt. J. Agric. Res., 84 (1B): 325 - 338. 
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), (2004). FAO Fish Stat plus. Aquaculture Production 1970-2002 Rome, Italy.
Fasakin, E.A., Balogun A.M. and Fasuru, B.E.(1999). Use of duckweed, Spirodela polyrrhiza, L. Schleiden, as a protein feedstuff in practical diets for tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus L. Aquaculture Research, 30: 313-318.
Green, B.W.(1992). Substitution of organic manure for pelleted feed in tilapia production. Aquaculture ,101: 213-222.
Habib, M. (2004). Freshwater crayfish. Circulation No. 29, GAFRD. Eid, A. E.; Danasoury, M. A.; Swidan, F. Z. and El Sayed, K. A. (1995). Evaluation of twelve practical diets for fingerlings Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Proc. 5th Sci. Conf. Animal Nutrition, Ismailia, Dec.,Vol. 1: 345 - 353.                                                                                                 
Hanley, F. (2000). Digestibility coefficients of feed ingredients for tilapia. Tilapia aquaculture in the 21st century proceeding form the fifth international Symposium on Tilapia Aquaculture. September 3-7.
Hardy, R. W. (1999). Collaborative opportunities between fish nutrition and other disciplines in aquaculture: an overview. Aquaculture, 177: 217 - 230.         
Hassan, M. S. and Edwards, P. (1992). Evaluation of duckweed (Lemna perpusilla  and Spirodela polyrrhiza) as feed for Nile tilapia   (Oreochromis  niloticus). Aquaculture, 104: 315 - 326.                                                                          
Ibrahim, S. M. (2009). Tilapia, from hatching to export. Scientific Forum "Aquaculture Future in Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate". Kafr El-Sheikh Fish Farming Co-operative Society, Sakha, 2 June.                      
Liti, D., Cherop, L., Munguti, J., and Chhorn, L.(2005). Growth and economic performance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) fed on two formulated diets and two locally available feeds in fertilized ponds. Aquac. Res., 36: 746-752.
Macdonald, P., Edwards, R.A. and Greenhalgh, J.F.D. (1973). Animal Nutrition, 2nd Ed., Longman, London.
Merck, E. (1974). Klinisches Labor, 12. Auflage. Diagnostica Merck, Darmstad, Deutschland.                                                                                                   
Merck, E. (1976). Labordiagnostik in der Tiermedizin. Diagnostica Merck, Darmstad, Deutschland.                                                                                                   
Moriarty, D.J.W.(1973). The physiology of digestion of blue-green algae in the cichlid fish, Tilapia nilotica. J. Zool. (Lond.), 171: 25-39.
    Pantha, B. (1982). The use of soybean in practical feeds for Tilapia niloticus. M. Sc. Thesis. Univ. of Stirling.
Radwan, I. A. (2009). Tilapia fish aquaculture in River Nile Delta 1990-2008. ASMAK, Fish World Magazine (Egyptian Fish Council), Apr., No.8, pp: 12 - 13.                                                                                                        
Ruenglertpanyakul, W.; Attasat, S. and Wanichpongpan, P. (2004). Nutrient removal from shrimp farm effluent by aquatic plants. Water Science and Technology, 50 (6): 321 - 330.                                                                    
SAS (1996). SAS/STAT Guide for personal computer. SAS Inst. Cary, N. C.
Schneider, O.; Amirkolaie, A. K.; Vera-Cartas, J.; Eding, E. H.; Schrama, J. W. and  Verreth, J. A. J. (2004). Digestibility, faeces recovery, and related carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus balances of five feed ingredients evaluated as fishmeal alternatives in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus L. Aquaculture Research, 35: 1370 - 1379.
Shaltout, K. H.; Mahmoud, Y. A. G.; Rabeh, S. A. and El-Samagawy, W. (2009). Ecomicrobiological study on River Nile at Kafr El-Zayat industrial area. 3rd Inter. Conf. on Aquatic Resources "Prospects and Challenges". 17th - 20th Nov., Alexandria, NIDF, p: 39.
Shiau, S. and Yu, Y. (1999). Dietary supplementation of chitin and chitosan depresses  growth in tilapia, Oreochromis niloticusO. aureus. Aquaculture, 179: 439 - 446.
Snow, A. M. and Ghaly, A. E. (2008). Assessment of hydroponically grown macrophytes for their suitability as fish feed. American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 4 (1): 43 - 56.                                                           
Tharwat, A. A. (2000). Catchability, morphometric relationships and chemical composition of the exotic crayfish Procambarus clarkii of the river Nile and its possibility for exploitation in Egypt.  J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 25(2): 787 - 799.                                                                                   
Varley, H. (1978). Practical Clinical Biochemistry. 4th ed., Arnold-Heinemann Publishers (India).
 
 
 
Related topics:
Authors:
A.M. Abdelhamid
Mansoura University, Egypt
Mansoura University, Egypt
Recommend
Comment
Share
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Aquaculture
Chris Beattie
Chris Beattie
MSD - Merck Animal Health
Global Head of Aquaculture at Merck Animal Health
United States
Jorge Arias
Jorge Arias
Alltech
United States
Gary J. Burtle
Gary J. Burtle
University of Georgia
University of Georgia
Associate Professor/Extension Specialist
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.