Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

Effect of source and level of dietary water hyacinth on nile tilapia oreochromis niloticus : i-performance

Published: April 27, 2010
By: A.M. Abdelhamid; F.I.Magouz, M. I. B. El-Mezeen, M.M.El-Sayed Khlaf Allah, and E. M. O. Ahmed
ABSTRACT 
a feeding laboratorial trial in glass aquaria for 12 weeks, to replace graded levels of water hyacinth (WH) meal protein from two (polluted and not polluted) sources instead of 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40% of soybean meal protein in Nile tilapia's diet. Ten experimental diets were formulated to be isocaloric and isonitrogenous (26% crude protein) and offered daily at 2 meals, 6 days a week at 3% of the biomass daily. The results could be summarized in the following: where quality criteria of the fish reaming water did not influence by the tested treatments. Concentration of most of the tested heavy metals had higher levels in WH and diets containing this WH from polluted source than those in the WH and diets containing WH from non-polluted source. Iron levels of the WH and experimental diets were > those of Mn > Zn > Cu > Pb > Cd. The highest ether extract (EE) and nitrogen free extract (NFE) and the lowest ash contents were realized in diet contained 30% replacement with WH leaves protein from non-polluted source. Growth performance parameters differed significantly as affected by WH source and level, so the final body weights (FBW) in treatments contained 10, 20 and 30% replacement with WH levels meal protein from the polluted source were significantly lower than those of WH from the non-polluted source.  Also, the pollution source for WH led to significantly lower other growth performance parameters than those of the unpolluted source for WH, whether for the bodyweight gain (BWG), survival rate (SR), or specific growth rate (SGR). Increasing level of WH leaves meal protein in the experimental diets led to significantly lower FBW, BWG, SR, SGR and condition factor. The pollution source of WH led to increases in the undeniable parts from the experimental fish (tissues' indices, hepato-somatic and female and male gonado-somatic indices), also more than 30% replacement negatively affected these indices. Contaminated source of WH decreased the feed conversion ratio (FCR) for the very low feed intake as well as for the low fish growth which led to apparent improvements in FCR, protein efficiency ratio (PER) and protein productive value (PPV). Increasing the substitution levels led to increased FCR and PPV but led to lower PER. All blood hematological and biochemical parameters of the tested fish significantly and negative influenced by source and level of WH in the experimental diets, except hemoglobin and total proteins' concentrations. Increasing level of WH leaves meal protein lowered blood total proteins in the fish as a result of lower quality of protein in such diets containing WH. Source and level of WH in the experimental diets significantly affected the chemical analysis of the whole fish body including CP, EE and ash contents.  The CP decreased and both of EE and ash were increased by elevating the substation level or for dietary contaminated WH increased by elevating the substation level or for dietary contaminated WH inclusion.  The increase in WH level in fish diets reduced the feed intake sharply particularly from the diets contained WH from the polluted source comparing with those contained WH from its non-polluted source. Although the low price of WH - included diets, particularly by increasing dietary WH levels; yet, the return from fish weight gain decreased, especially when WH was coming from its polluted source, which starkly reduced feed intake.
Key words: Water hyacinth - Nile tilapia - Growth performance - Feed utilization -   Economic evaluation.
INTRODUCTION
          Tilapia is the third largest group of farmed finfish species, only after carps (10.37 x 106 mt) and salmonids (0.94 x 106 mt) (FAO, 1997), with an average annual growth rate of about 11.5%. In addition, Nile tilapia was the 6th most cultured finfish species in the world in 1995 with a total production of 473,641 mt and an average compound growth rate of about 12% per annum since 1986. The global production of farmed tilapia has increased more than three-folds since 1984, from 186.544 mt to 659.000 mt, representing 4.48% of total farmed finfish in 1995, with a value of US$ 925 million (Tacon, 1997).  About 650.000 mt or 98.6% of farmed tilapia were produced in developing countries in 1995, where Asia alone produced about 84% of this amount (FAO, 1997).  EL-Sayed (2006) mentioned that Egypt produced 20% of the world tilapia capture and 12% of the world farmed tilapia. Recently, Bakeer (2009) cited that tilapia fish are among the ancient Egyptian fish of origin; yet, they became among the most outspreading fish species all over the world. They are cultured nowadays world wide , so their  production exceeded than 2.5 million tons year 2006, and Egypt now take the 2nd position after China in the world production and the 1st in Africa and middle East . He added that the local fish production is more than one million ton, from which the fish culture is about 63% (630 thousand tons) year 2007.  About 80% of the culture production is tilapia (504 thousand tons).
Water hyacinth (Eichhorinia crassipes, Mart Solms) is a warm water aquatic plant which widespread in many countries, particularly during summer months with its highest growth in July (Sivakami and Ayyappan, 1991). El-Sayed (2003) evaluated the effects of different fermentation methods on the nutritive value of water hyacinth (WH) for Nile tilapia fingerlings. Fresh dry hyacinth (FH), molasses - fermented hyacinth (MF), cow rumen content - fermented hyacinth (RF) and yeast - fermented hyacinth (YF) were incorporated into nine isonitrogenous (35% CP), isocaloric (450 kcal GE/100g) test diets as a replacement of dietary wheat bran at 10 and 20% substitution levels.  These results indicate that fermentation of WH way only be necessary when incorporated into Nile tilapia diets at 20% inclusion levels. El-Sayed (2003) showed that, the fermentation of water hyacinth only be necessary when incorporated into Nile tilapia diets at 20% inclusion levels.
               To be environmentally friends as well as to overcome the fish culture main problem of aqua feed shortage, an attention may be gifted to use this weed "water hyacinth" in fish feeding. So, the aim of this thesis was to evaluate the possibility of feeding Nile tilapia fish for 12 weeks on graded levels of replacing soybean meal protein with water hyacinth leaves meal protein.  The evaluation was carried out via studying the quality criteria of fish rearing water, growth performance and survival of fish, feed and nutrients utilization, blood picture, chemical composition and economic evaluation.                                                                            
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An in-door feeding experiment was conducted for 12 weeks to study the effect of replacing soybean  meal  protein by 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40% water hyacinth (Eichhorinia crassipes) protein from two sources, either from clean water or from polluted water, on growth performance, feed utilization, body composition, some blood parameters and preliminary economical evaluation of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings breeding.
 
Source of water hyacinth:
Water hyacinth was collected from two sources, the first source was from clean water (chanel) of the River Nile at Kafr El-Zayat.  The second source was from polluted water (ditch) collected from a canal at Tanta, Manshiet Ganzor.  The roots were removed and the rest of the plants were washed with rumming tap water to minimize the soil contamination, then dried under sunlight, and stored at room temperature until be used.
Experimaental fish:
The experimental fish (Oreochromis niloticus) were taken from the stock of Fish Research Laboratory in the Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University during January 2005.  Prior to the start of the experiment, the fingerlings were placed in a fiberglass tank and randomly distributed into the experimental aquaria to be adapted to the experimental conditions until the starting of the experiment. Fish were fed a control diet (without water hyacinth) for two weeks at a feeding level of 3% from the body biomass; during this period, healthy fish at the same weight replaced the died ones.
Experimental design of rearing fish:
A total number of 360 fish with 12.4 g average initial body weight were randomly distributed into 30 glass aquaria (70 l each, 12 fish in each). Each treatment was represented in three aquaria. Fresh tap water was stored in fiberglass tanks for 24h under aeration for dechlorination. One third of water aquaria was replaced daily and totally once every week after removing the wastes. The experimental aquaria were supplied with air by electerical small pumps and air stones. During the experimental period (12 weeks), each aquarium was suppled with electric heater and the water temperature was maintained on 26±10C through the thermostat. Photoperiod was controlled to be 14h per day using florescent light. Fish feces and feed residue were removed daily by siphoning. Water pH was in the range of 7.15-7.20 during the experimental period.
Experimental diets and feeding regime:
Prior to the start of the experiment, the fishes were adapted to a basal control diet (T1, Table 1) containing about 26% crude protein and consisted of fish meal, soybean meal, yellow corn, wheat bran, sunflower oil and vitamin and minerals mixture for two weeks. Ten experimental diets were formulated from a basal diet to contain two sources of dried water hyacinth at a level of 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40% of soybean meal protein (diets No. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), respectively (from unpolluted water) and 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40% of soybean meal protein (diets No. 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10), respectively (from polluted water) as shown in  Table (2). A basal diet was made from the commercial ingredients. The dry ingredients were finely grounded and mixed by a dough mixer for 20 minutes for homogeneity. Oil was gradually added during the mixing. After homogenous mixture was obtained, forty ml water per hundred g diet was slowly added to the mixture. The diets were cooked on a water evaporator for 20 minutes. The diets were pelleted (3 mm) through fodder machine and the manufacture pellets were dried in a drying oven at 70oC for 48 hours. The diets were collected, tagged and stored in refrigerator at 4oC. Fish in all treatments were daily fed the experimental diets at a level of 3% of the fish biomass then weighed every week; accordingly, the amount of food (which was given at two times daily at 8.0 a.m. and 3.0 p.m., six days a week for 12 weeks) was recalculated.
Table (1): Composition of the experimental diets.
 
Ingredients
Water hyacinth
(clean source)
Water hyacinth
(polluted source)
T1
(0)
T2
(10%)
T3
(20%)
T4
(30%)
T5
(40%)
T6
(0)
T7
(10%)
T8
(20%)
T9
(30%)
T10
(40%)
 Fish meal
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
 Soybean meal
34.0
30.6
27.2
23.8
20.4
34.0
30.6
27.2
23.8
20.4
 Yellow corn
41
36.23
31.46
26.68
21.92
41
36.23
31.46
26.68
21.92
 Wheat bran
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
 Sunflower oil
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
 Vit. and Min.
 premix*
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
 Water hyacinth
0
8.17
16.34
24.52
32.68
0
8.17
16.34
24.52
32.68
 Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
* Vitamins and minerals premix (product of HEPOMIX) each 2.5 kg contain: 12.000.000 IU Vit.A;  2.000.000 IU Vit. D3 ; 10 g Vit. E; 2g Vit. K3; 1g Vit. B1 5g Vit. B2; 1.5 g Vit. B6 ; 10g Vit.B12;  30 g Nicotinic acid ; 10 g Pantothenic acid ; 1g Folic acid; 50g Biotien; 250g Choline chlorid 50% ; 30g Iron; 10g copper; 50g Zinc; 60g Manganese; 1g Iodine; 0.1g Selenium and Cobalt 0.1g (local market).
 Water quality parameters:
Samples of water were taken from each aquarium daily to determine the values of pH, dissolved oxygen concentration and water temperature. The pH value of water was determined daily by using an electrical digital pH-meter. Concentrations of dissolved oxygen were measureed by using oxygen meter model 9060. Water temperature was determined by using a mercuric Celsius thermometer.
Chemical analysis:
Chemical analysis of ingredients, diets and fish samples were analyzed according to A.O.A.C. (1990) for dry matter, crude protein, ether extract, crude fiber and ash. Gross energy contents of the ingredients, experimental diets and fish samples were calculated by using the energy values of protein, lipid and carbohydrates presented in NRC (1993), being 5.65, 9.45 and 4.22 kcal/g, respectively.
Measurements of growth and feed utilization parameters:
Body weight of fish in each aquarium was measured at start and every week and total body length was measured at start, at 6th and 12th weeks during the experimental period (12 weeks). Growth parameters such as average weight gain (AWG), average daily gain (ADG), total body length gain (TLG), relative growth rate % (RGR), specific growth rate %/day (SGR) and survival rate % (SR) were calculated. Feed conversion ratio (FCR), protein efficiency ratio (PER) and protein productive value % (PPV), were estimated at the end of the experimental period according to the equations given by Abdelhamid (2009-a):
Organs indices:
All fish were killed at the end of the experiment, liver, kidneys, gonads, and spleen were removed and individually weighted. Hepatic somatic index (HSI), kidney somatic index 9kSI), gonado somatoc index (GSI), and spleen somatic index (SSI) were calculated as discreiped by Jangaard et al. (1967), Alabaster and Lioyed (1982), Tseng and Chan (1982) and Abdelhamid et al. ( 2004-a and b), respectively.
Blood Samples:
Blood Samples were collected at the end of the experiment, fish in each aquarium were weighed and 5 fish were taken randomy for blood sampling.  Blood samples were received in plastic tubes. Blood serum was isolated by centrifugation for 20 minutes at 4000 rpm. Serum samples were kept in deep freezer till the chemical analysis. Red blood cells count (RBCs x 106/mm) and white blood cells (WBCs x 103/mm) were counted by using a haemocytometer. Hemoglobin was determined by the method described. Blood serum biochemical constituents were determined calorimetrically using commercial kits produced by Diagnostic System Laboratories, INC, USA. Total protein was determined as described by Tietz (1990).  Albumin was determined according to Doumas et al. (1971). The concentration of serum globulin was obtained by subtracting the albumin from the total blood serum proteins concentration. Serum cholesterol was carried out according to the method described by Trinder (1969). Serum total lipids was determined according to the method of McGowan et al. (1983). Serum creatinine was estimated according to the method of Tietz (1986). Blood serum urea was determined according to Patton and Grouch (1977). Activity of alanin amino transferase (ALT) and activity of asparatate transferase (AST) were determined by the methods of Young (1990).
Economical evaluation:
Preliminary economical evaluation of the experimental diets has been calculated based on the cost of one kg fish weight gain produced (LE), using feed conversion rate and the price of the experimental diets. Costs were the price of feeds in local markets during 2005. Costs of 1 kg of fish meal, soybean meal, wheat bran, yellow corn, sunflower oil, vitamins and minerals premix, were 6, 1.5, 0.70, 1, 3.5, 10, 8, 5, 7 and 4 LE, respectively.
Statistical analysis:
The obtained numerical data were statistically analyzed using SAS (1996) for one-way analysis of variance. Differences between comparisons among treatment means were made by using Duncan multiple range test (Duncan, 1955).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 Water quality criteria:
         Table (2) illustrates some quality criteria measured in the fish rearing water as means (of the experimental whole period) for different experimental treatments (replacing levels by water hyacinth whether from clean or polluted origins).  Water temperatures range 26.4 - 27.5oC, pH 7.15 - 7.20 and dissolved oxygen 5.01 - 5.30 mg/l.  These ranges are ideal for rearing Nile tilapia fish according to Abdelhamid (1994, 1996, 2009-a & b) and Abdelhakeem et al. (2002).                                 
Trace and heavy metals:                                                                                              
          Table (3) shows some trace elements and heavy metals content of water hyacinth (WH) and diets used in the tested fish feeding.  From this Table, it is clear that most of these elements were higher in the WH from polluted source than from clean source by 1160.7, 193/1, 373.6, 246.9, 25.0, and a% for Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, Pb, and Cd, respectively.  This consequently elevated the same elements in the diets containing polluted WH than in those containing the clean WH by 2217.3% (Fe), 221.8% (Mn), 379.6% (Zn), 181.0% (Cu), 500%  (Pb) and  0.0%  (Cd).   However, the highest concentrations were for Fe > Mn > Zn > Cu > Pb > Cd, whether in WH or in the experimental diets.  In this context, Abdelhamid and Gabr (1991-b) obtained higher Pb and Hg concentrations in ditch - WH than in channel - WH.  Water hyacinth plant differs in its heavy metal concentrations from one part of the plant to the other parts of the same plant, since its leaves contain more alumenium (2.1%) than its steam (1,5%).  Yet, ferras is more concentrated in steams (0.354%) than in the leaves (0.255%).  So, WH is using in reducing heavy metals toxicity for its spongy like properties in adsorption and accumulation of what is in the attached environment (James et al., 1992).  However, aquatic plants are spongy-like, i.e. they absorb different elements and metals from the ambient water and accumulate them in their tissues (Abdelhamid, 2009-b).                                                                                      
Table (2): Averages of some physical and chemical parameters of fish rearing water during the feeding experimental period as affected by level and source of water hyacinth in the diets.
 
Treatments
Source of water hyacinth
Water temperature oC
Water pH
Dissolved oxygen mg/L
 
T1
Clean water
27.50
7.20
5.30
Polluted water
27.50
7.20
5.30
 
T2
Clean water
27.40
7.15
5.00
Polluted water
27.45
7.20
5.01
 
T3
Clean water
27.00
7.15
5.01
Polluted water
26.45
7.15
5.01
 
T4
Clean water
26.85
7.15
5.02
Polluted water
27.00
7.20
5.02
 
T5
Clean water
26.50
7.20
5.04
Polluted water
26.40
7.15
5.02
 
Table (3): Chemical composition of some metals of water hyacinth and manufactured diets as affected by the dietary water hyacinth (WH) source.
 
Items
Source of water hyacinth
Minerals (ppm)
Fe
Mn
Zn
Cu
Pb
Cd
 
Water hyacinth (WH)
Clean water
305
96.6
10.6
3.2
0.4
0.00
Polluted water
3540
186.5
39.6
7.9
0.1
0.01
 
Diets including (WH)
Clean water
106.3
43.5
4.9
2.1
0.01
0.00
Polluted water
2357
96.5
18.6
3.8
0.05
0.00
        
    Diets composition:                                                                                                                                                                                      
 Table (4) presents routine analysis of the experimental diets.  They were almost isonitogenous and isocaloric (26.13 - 26.80% crude protein and 429 - 443 Kcal/100 g dry matter, respectively).  Yet, EE, NFE and ash ranges were 4.35 - 5.05%, 58.07 - 61.37% and 7.34 - 11.03%, respectively.  Treatment No. 4 containing clean WH was the highest in EE and NFE and the lowest in ash contents among all diets with different WH inclusion levels and sources.  This is in agreement with the findings of Abdelhamid and Gabr (1991-a) who found that water hyacinth (WH) contains low organic matter although its crude protein content was high.  Also, ash, K, and cell wall fractions were high.  Thus, its intake, digestibility, feeding values and N-balance were low. Its high K content affected negatively serum analysis, water balance and kidney function.  So, it may be used as an ingredient but not solely in animal feeding. Also, Abdelhamid and Gabr (1991-b) reported that WH from the ditch reflected higher contents of ether extract, crude protein, ash, aced detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ACL), cellulose and silica whereas most of the minerals (Ca, P, Pb and Hg) were lower than in WH from the chanel.  The leaves contained more neutral detergent fiber (NDF), hemicelluloses, cellulose, total phenols and phenalic tannin, but stems were higher in ADF and ADL than leaves.  Ca/P ratio was narrow in the whole plant than in leaves or stems.  Digestibility of organic matter (in vitro gas production system, 58.4%) was closely to the in vivo estimated value (59.5%),
Table (4): Chemical analysis of the experimental diets on dry matter basis (%) and calculated* gross energy content (Kcal/ 100 g) as affected by the dietary source and level of water hyacinth (WH).
Treat.
DM
CP
EE
Ash
NEF
GE
Source of WH
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
T1
59.0
59.0
26.5
26.5
4.73
4.70
8.60
8.60
60.2
60.2
439
438
T2
59.4
60.2
26.5
26.4
4.40
4.83
11.03
8.60
58.1
60.1
442
440
T3
59.8
60.2
26.4
26.8
5.02
4.83
8.46
8.56
60.2
59.8
429
439
T4
61.2
60.6
26.2
26.1
5.05
4.35
7.34
8.63
61.4
60.9
443
437
T5
66.7
59.4
26.4
26.3
4.98
4.70
7.72
7.90
60.9
61.1
442
441
* After NRC (1993), C: clean and P: polluted sources
although metabolizalle energy was 6.35 MJ/Kg DM.  They added that, inclusion of WH in the rations reduced feed intake.  Digestibility and nutritive values decreased by increasing WH levels in the ration.  They found also, that WH increased blood total protein, albumin, total lipids and cholesterol, and decreased creatinin, phospholipids, inorganic P and Ca, so WH may not be offered as a sole feed but it could be replace up to 50% of the diet's concentrates. So, El-Sayed (1999) presented alternative dietary protein sources for tilapia with emphasis on aquatic plants.  Also, El-Ebiary et al. (2004) recommended using WH at a level up to 50% of tilapia diets.  Abdelwareth (2006) found that WH contains 34% CP, 6% EE and 6.5% crude fiber and recommended its use at 20 - 30% level from dietary fish meal for Nile tilapia.  Moreover, El-Sayed (2006) referred to water hyacinth as unconventional feedstuff that can be used in semi-intensive culture of tilapia in Egypt.  He gave its chemical composition as 21.1% CP, 1.0% EE, 19.0% CF, 18.2% ash and 40.7% NFE to be fed at 10 - 20% of the fish diet.                                                                                           
Growth performance:
           From Tables (5 and 6), initial body weight of the tested fish did not differ between clean and polluted WH included diets nor among levels (treatments) of the WH in the fish diets.  Yet, final body weight of T2, T3 and T4 polluted WH were significantly lower than those of clean WH.  Since polluted WH inclusion and increasing WH levels led to significantly lower final body weight, total body weight gain, average daily gain and survival rate.  Also, specific growth rate (SGR) took the same trends, i.e. it decreased by elevating WH inclusion level in the fish diet as well as by polluted WH than clean WH source.  Also, increasing WH dietary inclusion levels led to lower condition (K) factor (Table 7). In accordance with the present results, El-Ebiary et al. (2004) reported lower growth performance parameters of Nile tilapia fry by increasing the level of replacement with WH to more than 50%.  Abdelhamid et al. (2006) came to the same conclusion, thus they recommended to use WH protein at a level up to 20% of soybean protein in a diet for feeding Nile tilapia fingerlings.                                                                                                          
Table (5): Growth performance and survival rate/aquarium of the experimental fish throughout the experimental period as affected by the dietary level and source of water hyacinth (WH).
 
Treatment
Initial weight (g)
Final weight
 (g)
Average total weight gain  (g)
Average daily gain (g/ day)
SGR
(%/day)
Survial rate
(%)
Source of WH
Clean water
Polluted water
Clean water
Polluted water
Clean water
Polluted water
Clean water
Polluted water
Clean water
Polluted water
Clean water
Polluted water
T1
147.00
149.00
187.33ab
188.17a
40.33ab
30.17a
0.42ab
0.41a
0.289
0.278
83.00b
83.00b
T2
147.67
149.33
184.00bA
174.27bB
36.33bA
24.94bB
0.38bA
0.26bB
0.262
0.184
100.00a
100.00a
T3
146.67
149.00
188.00aA
169.50bB
41.33abA
20.50bB
0.43abA
0.21bB
0.291
0.153
97.33a
94.33a
T4
147.33
149.33
189.67a
170.00b
42.34aA
20.67bB
0.44aA
0.22bB
0.301
0.154
97.00a
91.00a
T5
147.33
149.00
175.33a
175.00b
28.00c
26.00b
0.29c
0.27b
0.207
0.191
91.38abA
81.83bB
MSE*
0.34
0.46
1.44
2.00
1.55
2.09
0.02
0.03
-
-
1.93
1.96
a, b and c means in the same rows bearing different letters significantly at 0.05 level.
A and B means in the same columns bearing different letters differ significantly at 0.05 level.
 * Standard error of the mean derived from the analysis of variance.
                                         
                                                                         
Table (6): Average weight gain (g/fish) and average daily gain (mg/fish) as affected by the dietary level and source of water hyacinth (WH).
 
Treatment
AWG (g/fish)
ADG (mg/fish)
Clean water
Polluted water
Clean water
Polluted water
T1
0.5315B
1.6810A
5.7730aA
0.8125ab
T2
0.2881B
0.8480A
0.3001bB
2.1455bA
T3
0.1304B
1.0398A
0.8640ab
0.9385c
T4
0.0425B
0.6738A
1.2199a
2.0439b
T5
0.4384B
1.8199A
0.6561abB
5.4847aA
 
Table (7): Data of fish final weight (g), total length (cm) and condition (K) factor at the end of the experimental period as affected by the dietary level and source of water hyacinth (WH).
Treatment
Final weight
Total length (L)
K- factor
Source of WH
Clean water
Polluted water
Clean water
Polluted water
Clean water
Polluted water
T1
15.69
18.85
10.30
10.60
1.435
1.500
T2
15.84
14.60
14.13
12.91
0.560
0.71
T3
15.40
15.00
11.97
12.27
0.897
0.812
T4
12.72
15.94
11.17
11.23
0.911
1.122
T5
20.23
15.94
11.60
12.17
1.296
0.884
MSE*
2.43
1.83
0.47
0.35
0.01
0.02
a, b and c means in the same rows bearing different letters significantly at 0.05 level.
A and B means in the same columns bearing different letters differ significantly at   
               0.05 level.
 * Standard error of the mean derived from the analysis of variance.
 
Internal organs' indices:
               The polluted WH diets increased significantly the inedible parts, i.e. hepato-somatic index and gonado-somatic index of both females and males than the other source (clean) of WH (Table 8).  Up to 30% replacement  improved  these  indices,  but  higher  than 30%  affected  negatively these indices.  However, Abdelhamid et al. (2006) reported that dietary WH inclusion did not significantly influence HSI nor GSI (in female) but there were significant differences among treatments concerning GSI (male).                                     
Table (8): Effect of level and source of dietary water hyacinth on organs indices of the experimental fish at the end of the experiment.
Treatment
HIS
GSI (Female)
GSI (Male)
Source of WH
Clean water
Polluted water
Clean water
Polluted water
Clean water
Polluted water
T1
0.5315B
1.6810A
0.9075ab
0.2153bB
5.7730aA
0.8125ab
T2
0.2881B
0.8480A
0.3341bB
2.3058aA
0.3001bB
2.1455bA
T3
0.1304B
1.0398A
0.5911b
0.6083b
0.8640ab
0.9385c
T4
0.0425B
0.6738A
1.4500ab
1.3428ab
1.2199a
2.0439b
T5
0.4384B
1.8199A
0.7708ab
0.2004b
0.6561abB
5.4847aA
MSE*
0.19
0.21
0.17
0.24
0.34
0.48
a, b and c means in the same rows bearing different letters significantly at 0.05 level.
A and B means in the same columns bearing different letters differ significantly at
               0.05 level.
* Standard error of the mean derived from the analysis of variance.
 
Feed conversion and protein utilization:
                Table (9) show that feed conversion ratio was lower on polluted-WH diets than on clean - WH diets throughout all dietary inclusion levels.  This may be due to lower bodyweight gain in fish fed the polluted-WH diets (Table 7) as well as to very low feed intake (Table 13) resulting in apparently better feed conversion, protein efficiency ratio (PER), and protein productive value (PPV%) as illustrated in Table (9).  However, FCR and PPV% increased and PER decreased by increasing level of WH replacement.                                                
 
Table (9): Data of feed conversion ratio (FCR), protein efficiency ratio (PER), and protein productive value (PPV%) throughout the entire period of the experiment as affected by the dietary level and source of water hyacinth (WH).
Treatment
FCR
PER
PPV %
Source of WH
Clean water
Polluted water
Clean water
Polluted water
Clean water
Polluted water
T1
2.76b
0.85c
1.39
4.50b
22b
22.09b
T2
3.60a
1.53b
1.06
2.51B
31a
42.84a
T3
3.00a
1.79b
1.27
2.14B
28a
22.50b
T4
2.93b
1.78b
1.31
2.13B
27a
34.36a
T5
3.92a
1.28b
0.97
2.98A
23b
20.22b
a, b and c means in the same rows bearing different letters significantly at 0.05 level.
A and B means in the same columns bearing different letters differ significantly at
               0.05 level.
             
                    In agreement with these results, El-Ebiary et al. (2004) registered that PPV and energy utilization by fish decreased by increasing the level of replacement with WH to more than 50%.  Thus, they recommended using WH at a level up to 50% of diets containing a mixture of fish meal and soybean meal for feeding Nile tilapia fingerlings.  Moreover, Abdelhamid et al. (2006) mentioned that PPV and PER of fish were decreased by increasing the level of replacement with WH more than 20%.                                                 
 Blood profile:
          Significant differences were recorded among treatments of both groups fed on diets included WH whether from clean or polluted sources, concerning all tested hematological and biochemical parameters, with one exception in Table 10 (total proteins) and Table 11 (hemoglobin).  There was a general decreasing trend in values of uric acid, urea, total protein, albumin, globulin, cholesterol, hemoglobin, and red blood cells in the fish fed clean WH including diets, but there was a general increasing trend in levels of transaminases, white blood cells and platelets (Table 10).  Similar trends were recorded in Table (11) except for uric acid, urea, and transaminases which took the opposite trend (decrease).  In this context, increasing the plasma total protein indicates the improvement in the nutritional value of the diet.  In the present investigation, total protein was lowest when fish fed a diet where 30% (T4, Table 10) or 40% (T5, Table 11) of soybean meal protein were substituted by WH protein and this is due to inferior the protein quality of these diets.  Generally, anemia causes lower Hb concentration and RBCs count; bacterial infection, acidosis, and leucosis lead to higher WBCs count; liver diseases are responsible for lower concentration of blood urea, uric acid, and proteins, as well as transaminases' activity; malabsorption syndrome is a causative for lower level of blood lipids; and not infrequently lower cholesterol concentrations are obtained in pernicious anemia (Merck, 1976 and Varley, 1978).                                                                              
Fish body composition:
                  The chemical composition at the experimental begin was 26.07% dry water, 54.30% crude protein, 9.0% fat and 14.0% ash CDM basis.  From Table (12) of the chemical analysis (% dry matter basis) of the whole fish body at the end of the experiment, it is clear that both of WH sources and dietary inclusion levels affected
Table (10): Data of blood hematological and biochemical parameters of the experimental fish at the end of experimental period as affected by the dietary level of water hyacinth (WH) from the clean source.
T
Uric mg/dl
Urea mg/dl
T. Prot. g/dl
Albu g/dl
Glob g/dl
T. mg/dl Lipid
Cholost. Mg/dl
AST  u/l
ALT u/l
RBC   x 106
WBC
Plat.
Hb  g/dl
T1 (Zero)
0.95 + 0.03a
16.20 + 0.20a
2.93 + 0.03N.S
0.88 + 0.03b
2.05 + 0.05a
147.25 + 0.25a
202.50 + 0.50a
64.50 + 0.50b
61.00 + 1.00b
4.38 + 0.03a
1525.0 + 25.00c
100.0 + 0.00b
11.50 + 0.00a
T2  (10)
0.75 + 0.05b
16.10 + 0.30a
2.65 + 0.25
0.70 + 0.10b
1.95 + 0.05a
148.00 + 0.00a
192.50 + 2.50b
64.00 + 1.00b
61.50 + 0.50b
4.25 + 0.05a
1850.0 + 50. 0b
130.00 + 5.00a
11.00 + 0.20ab
T3  (20)
0.67 + 0.04bc
11.15 + 0.25b
2.90 + 0.10
1.85 + 0.05a
1.05 + 0.05b
132.70 + 0.70c
159.00 + 1.00c
80.00 + 1.00a
77.50 + 0.50a
3.45 + 0.05c
2050.0 + 50.0a
120.50 + 0.50a
9.75 + 0.75b
T4  (30)
0.55 + 0.05c
13.20 + 0.30b
2.05 + 0.05
1.50 + 0.30a
0.55 + 0.25b
139.50 + 0.50b
156.50 + 0.50c
76.50 + 2.50a
77.00 + 1.00a
3.85 + 0.05b
1875.0 + 25.0b
127.50 + 2.50a
10.50 + 0.50ab
T5  (40)
0.75 + 0.05b
15.20 + 0.40a
2.70 + 0.60
0.766 + 0.14b
1.89 + 0.41a
147.20 + 0.00C
160.00 + 0.00C
64.00 + 0.00b
64.00 + 0.00b
4.25 + 0.05a
1050.0 + 50.0d
122.50 + 2.50a
10.75 + 0.25ab
Mean
0.73 + 0.05
14.37 + 0.65
2.65 + 0.14
1.138 + 0.16
1.50 + 0.21
142.89 + 1.99
174.10 + 6.49
69.80 + 2.37
69.80 + 2.37
4.04 + 0.12
1670.0 + 118.6
120.10 + 3.65
10.70 + 0.24
a, b, c and d means in the same column bearing different letters differ significantly at 0.05 level.
N.S. not significant at P > 0.05.
 
Table (11): Data of blood hematological and biochemical parameters of the experimental fish at the end of experimental period as affected by the dietary level of water hyacinth (WH) from the polluted source.
T
Uric mg/dl
Urea mg/dl
T. Prot. g/dl
Albu g/dl
Glob g/dl
T. mg/dl Lipid
Cholost. Mg/dl
AST  u/l
ALT u/l
RBC   x 106
WBC
Plat.
Hb  g/dl
T1 (Zero)
0.45 + 0.05cd
12.75 + 0.45b
1.70 + 0.20ab
0.88 + 0.08b
0.83 + 0.13a
138.00 + 0.00bc
222.50 + 2.50ab
76.50 + 1.50ab
73.50 + 0.50ab
4.28 + 0.03c
1275.0 + 25.00c
115.00 + 5.00bc
10.70 + 0.00N.S
T2  (10)
0.82 + 0.02b
13.15 + 0.05b
2.05 + 0.05a
1.20 + 0.00a
0.85 + 0.05a
146.45 + 2.85a
232.50 + 7.50a
65.00 + 1.00c
65.50 + 0.50c
4.48 + 0.03a
1350.0 + 50. 0bc
104.00 + 2.00c
10.80 + 0.80
T3  (20)
0.65 + 0.05bc
15.15 + 0.35a
1.90 + 0.06ab
0.95 + 0.05b
0.92 + 0.03a
134.50 + 1.50c
240.00 + 1.00a
79.00 + 0.00a
75.00 + 0.50a
4.38 + 0.02b
1275.0 + 25.0c
105.00 + 0.50c
11.00 + 0.00
T4  (30)
1.30 + 0.01a
12.05 + 0.05c
1.45 + 0.15b
0.85 + 0.05b
0.55 + 0.05b
144.15 + 2.55ab
237.50 + 2.50a
77.50 + 0.50ab
65.50 + 1.50c
4.33 + 0.03bc
1475.0 + 25.0b
125.00 + 5.0ab
11.40 + 0.50
T5  (40)
0.30 + 0.05d
15.00 + 0.30a
0.90 + 0.05c
0.38 + 0.03c
0.50 + 0.00b
134.50 + 1.50C
209.00 + 9.00b
75.50 + 0.50a
71.50 + 1.50a
4.00 + 0.00d
1750.0 + 25.0a
130.00 + 0.00a
11.05 + 0.25
Mean
0.70 + 0.12
13.62 + 0.42
1.60 + 0.14
0.85 + 0.09
0.73 + 0.06
139.52 + 1.77
228.30 + 4.21
74.70 + 1.69
70.20 + 1.36
4.29 + 0.05
1425.0 + 60.61
115.90 + 3.61
10.99 + 0.15
a, b, c and d means in the same column bearing different letters differ significantly at 0.05 level.
N.S. not significant at P > 0.05.
 
Table (12): Chemical analysis (% DM basis) of the fish body at the end of the experimental period as affected by level and source of dietary water hyacinth (WH).
Treatment
Dry matter
Crude protein
Ether extract
Ash
Source of WH
Clean water
Polluted water
Clean water
Polluted water
Clean water
Polluted water
Clean water
Polluted water
T1
25.72
28.78
60.81abA
58.83B
19.27b
20.77
19.63
19.60
T2
28.01
25.85
60.17ab
58.86
18.43b
20.74
19.17
20.03
T3
25.81
26.19
62.27aA
58.17B
20.35ab
21.77
19.87
20.03
T4
24.97
26.93
56.77c
58.50cB
21.27a
21.67
2-/3-
19.83
T5
25.41
25.61
59.70b
58.23B
20.17ab
21.63
20.03
20.14
MSE*
0.48
0.52
0.55
0.19
0.32
0.21
0.30
0.20
a, b and c means in the same rows bearing different letters significantly at 0.05 level.
A and B means in the same columns bearing different letters differ significantly at 0.05 level.
 *  Standard error of the mean derived from the analysis of variance.
 
 
significantly each of crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE) and ash contents.  Where, CP decreased but EE and ash increased by elevating the substitution level and inclusion of polluted WH. This refers to the bad feed utilization by increasing WH substituting level, particularly from polluted source, may be for its inclusion on some heavy metals and also may be attributed to the low DM content of the tested rations.  But also to that WH is containing saponin as a toxic substance, and ca. 45 Kg of this aquatic plant could be converted into 1 Kg of fish.  Moreover, WH is rich in crude fiber and ash contents leading to low nutritive value (Jian, 1985). However, Lim and Dominiy (1989) cited that replacing fish meal either partially or totally with less expensive plant proteins in practical diets of various warm water fish species had varying degrees of success.  It is generally observed that plant proteins have a lower nutritive value than fish meal and high levels of inclusion of plant proteins usually result in reduced growth and feed efficiency.  The ability of fish to utilize plant proteins also differs; results obtained by different researchers are sometimes contradictory.  Despite the poor utilization of plant protein as compared to fish meal (for the presence of anti-nutritional factors or toxic substances, improper balance of essential  nutrients,  high fiber and  carbohydrates  content,  decreased palatability and reduction of pellet quality), practically the plant proteins are being used to some extent in commercial warm water fish feeds. The facts of the negative relationship between CP and EE from one side and the between dry matter (DM) and CP on the other side were realized in this study.  Also, there was a positive relationship between DM and EE contents.  These relationships confirm those reported before since a negative relationship was noticed between CP and EE contents of fish body but a position relationship between CP and ash contents was recorded too (Abdelhamid et al., 2000; and El-Saidy and Gaber, 2002). There was a positive correlation between crude protein and fat contents of the fish, also Abdelhamid et al. (2004-a & b and 2005-a & b), Magouz et al. (2002-a & b), El-Ebiary and Zaki (2003), Abdelhamid and El-Katan (2006-a & b) and Abdelhamid et al. (2009) found a negative correlation between protein and fat contents of the fish.           
Economic evaluation:
                Elevating WH level reduced the feed intake, particularly from polluted source to about 30% of that consumed from clean-WH including diets (Table 13).  Dietary inclusion of WH reduced the feed price gradually by increasing the level of WH substitution.  Yet, total fish body gain decreased, especially by using WH from polluted source; so, the feed cost/Kg bodyweight gain increased by increasing WH level of dietary inclusion but not be using the polluted WH because of the very low of feed intake.  Similarly, Abdelhamid et al. (2006) found that same trend in their results. 
Table (13): Data of economic evaluation of feeding process as affected by level and source of dietary water hyacinth (WH).
Treatment
Feed Intake (g)
Cost (L.E) of one Ton diet
Decrease in feed cost (%)
Total gain   (g/Fish
Feed cost/gain* (L.E)
Source of WH
Clean
Polluted
Clean
Polluted
Clean
Polluted
Clean
Polluted
Clean
Polluted
T1
111.40
33.49
2765.0
2765.0
-
-
40.33
39.17
7.63
2.36
T2
131.08
38.19
2625.4
2625.4
139.6
139.6
36.33
24.93
9.47
4.02
T3
124.34
36.88
2425.9
2425.9
339.1
339.1
41.33
20.50
7.29
4.36
T4
124.24
36.82
2346.2
2346.2
418.8
418.8
42.33
20.67
6.88
4.17
T5
109.97
33.48
2206.8
2206.8
558.2
558.2
28.00
25.00
8.66
2.84
* Feed cost/Kg gain (L.E) = Feed intake (g) x cost (L.E) of one Kg feed/100 x total gain (g).
                                                                                                                                                      Conclusively, it is not to recommend using water hyacinth from polluted water sources in feeding fish.  In emergency cases only and in case of feed shortage, water hyacinth from non-polluted water sources could be used up to 30% not more as a substitute level in fish diets instead of soybean meal protein.  In conclusion, the histological examination cleared no pathological lesions in liver and kidney or pathological effects on gills and the dorsal muscles when fish were fed diets in which protein of soybean meal was replaced by up to 20% water hyacinth from clean source or 10% water hyacinth from polluted source.                                                             
REFERENCES
Abdelhamid, A.M. (1994). Scientific Fundamentals for Fish Production and Management.  An Arabic Textbook, Dar Al-Nashr for Egyptian Universities - Alwafaa Bookshop, Cairo, I.S.B.N. 977-5526-04-1, 658 p. (An Arabic Textbook).
Abdelhamid, A.M. (1996). Field and Laboratorial Analysis in Animal Production.  Dar Annashr for Universities, Cario, Deposi No. 11318/1996, 680 p. (Arabic Textbook).
Abdelhamid, A.M. (2009-a). Fundamentals of Fish Production and Culture. New Universal Office, Alexandria, I.S.B.N. 977-438-052-5, 393 p. (An Arabic Textbook).
Abdelhamid, A.M. (2009-b). Modern Approach in Aquaculture. New   Universal Office, Alexandria, I.S.B.N. 977-438-053-3, 393 p. (An Arabic Textbook).
Abdelhamid, A.M. and El-Katan, M.S.A. (2006-a).  A study on Nile tilapia fingerlings during wintering using dietary addition of Bio-Buds-2X.  J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 31: 5705 - 5711.
Abdelhamid, A.M. and El-Katan, M.S.A. (2006-b).  A study on Nile tilapia brooders during wintering by adding dietary fats or vitamins.  J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 31(9): 5689 - 5704.
Abdelhamid, A.M. and Gabr, A.A. (1991-a).  Utilization of water hyacinth hay in comparison with berseem hay as sole feeds by sheep with emphasis on its hazardous effects.  J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 16(3): 507 - 517.
Abdelhamid, A.M. and Gabr, A.A. (1991-b).  Evaluation of water hyacinth as a feed for ruminants.  Arch. Anim. Nutr., Berlin, 41(7/8): 745 - 756.
Abdelhamid, A.M., Khalil, F.F. and El-Zareef, A.A.M. (2000).  Studies on iron in Egyptian freshwater fishes. 2- Effect of vitamin C and/or vitamin A supplementation on iron utilization by tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and catfish (Clarias lazera).  J. Agric. Sci., Mansoura Univ., 25(1): 113 - 131.
Abdelhamid, A.M., Salem, M.F.I. and Khalafalla, M.M.E. (2006). Substitution of soybean meal by waterhyacinth hay in diets of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis  niloticus).  The 2nd Inter. Sci. Con. For Environment "Recent Environmental Problems and Social Sharement", 28-30 March, South Valley University. pp. 114 - 126 (Engormix.com Aquaculture Technical Articles, 2007, 6 p.).
Abdelhamid, A.M., Salem, M.F.I. and Tolan, A.E. (2004-a). Evaluation of sesame meal as a dietary protein source for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 29 : 6887 - 6897.                            
Abdelhamid, A.M., Salem, M.F.I. and Tolan, A.E. (2004-b). Evaluation of mallow (Malva parviflora L.) plants as an alternative protein source for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 29: 6899 - 6910.
Abdelhamid, A.M., Salem, M.F.I. and Tolan, A.E. (2005-a). Evaluation of linseed meal as feed ingredient in diets on growing Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). J. Agric. Res. Tanta Univ., 31(3): 385 - 402.
Abdelhamid, A.M., Salem, M.F.I. and Tolan, A.E. (2005-b). Utilization of black seed meal (Nigella sativa) in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) diets. J. Agric. Res. Tanta Univ., 31(3): 403 - 419.
Abdelhamid, A.M.; Mehrim, A.I.; Salem, M.F.I. and Yosuf, H.A.E. (2009).  All-male monosex Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), Pros and cons. Egypt.  J. Basic Appl. Physiol., 8(1): 41 - 57.
Abdelwareth, A.A. (2006).  Fish Nutrition. Vol. 1 (An Arabic Textbook, Al-Azhar Univ.).  Deposition No. 8666/2006.
Alabaster, J.S. and Lioyed, R. (1982).  Water Quality Criteria for Fresh Water Fish Second Edition.  Bolter Work Scientific, London.
A.O.A.C. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1990). Official methods of analysis. 15th Ed. Published by the A.O.A.C., Benjamin Francklin Station, Washington. D.C., USA.                                                             
Bakeer, M.N. (2009).  Trade and marketing of tilapia fish in Egypt. ASMAK, Fish World Magazine (Egyptian Fish Council), Oct., No. 10, pp: 22 - 24.
Doumas, B.; Wabson, W. and Biggs, H. (1971).  Albumin standards and measurement of serum with bromochresol green.  Clin. Chem. Acto., 31: 87.
Duncan, D.B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F-test. Biometrics, 11: 1-42.
El-Ebiary, E.H. and Zaki, M.A. (2003).  Effect of supplementing active yeast to the diets on growth performance, nutrient utilization, whole body composition and blood consitituents of mono-sex tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).  Egypt. J. Aquat. Biol. & Fish, 7(1): 127 - 139.
El-Ebiary, E.H.; Zaki, M.A. and Mabrook, H.A. (2004).  Evaluation of plant protein concentrates in feeding Nile tilapia fry (Oreochromis niloticus). Egypt. J. Aquat. Biol. & Fish., 8 (1): 1 - 17.
El-Saidy, D.M.S. and Gaber, M.M.A. (2002).  Intensive culture of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus in concrete tanks in Egypt: Effect of stocking density and feeding levels on growth performance, production traits, feed conversion and body composition.  Proc. 1st Sc. Conf. Aqua., El-Arish, 13 - 15 Dec., pp.: 1 - 22.
El-Sayed, A.F.M. (2006).  Tilapia Culture. CABI Publishing, UK.
El-Sayed, A.M. (1999). Alternative dietary protein sources for farmed tilapia, Oreochromis spp.  Aquaculture, 179: 149 - 168.
El-Sayed, A.M. (2003).  Effects of fermentation methods on the nutritive value of water hyacinth for Nile Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (L.) fingerlings.  Aquaculture, Vol. 218, No. 1-4, pp. 471 - 478.
FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1997).  Aquaculture Production Statistics 1986-1995. FAO Fish. Circ. No. 815, Rev. 9, Rome, Italy. 179 pp.
Jangaarrd, P.M.; Ackman, R.G. and Spois, A.J. (1967).  Seasonal studies of the fatty acids composition of liver flesh, roe and milt lipid J. Fish Res. Biol. of Canada, 24: 613 - 627.
Jian, S. (1985).  Training Manual - Integrated Fish Farming in China.  Regional Lead Centre in China, Asian - Pacific Regional Research and Training Centre for Integrated Fish Farming, Wuxi, China.
Lim, C. and Dominiy, W. (1989). Utilization of plant proteins by warm water fish. Technical Bulletin, American Soybean Association, 12 P.
Lu, J.; Takeuchi. T. and Satoh, H. (2004). Ingestion and assimilation of three species of freshwater algae by larval tilapia. Aquaculture, 238: 437 - 449.
Lung, A.H.; Sitoki, L. and Kenyanya, M. (2001).  The nutrient enrichment of lake Victoria (Kenyan waters). Hydrobiologia 2001, Vol. 458, No. 1-3, pp. 75 - 82.
Machado A.A. (1990).  Ecology of fishes of the floodplain areas of the Venezuelan Lanos Interciencia, 1990, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 411 - 423.
Magouz, F.I.; Mohsen, M.K. and Abd El-Moniem, N.M. (2002-a).  Utilization of different sources and levels of lipids in the diet of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).  Proc. 2nd Conf. Foodborne Contamination and Egyptians' Health, 23 - 24 April, El-Mansoura, Egypt, pp.: 357 - 370.
Magouz, F.I.; Mohsen, M.K. and Gooda, A.H. (2002-b).  Effect of including some biological feed additives in the diet on growth performance and feed efficiency of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).  Proc. 2nd Conf. Foodborne Contamination and Egyptians' Health, 23 - 24 April, El-Mansoura, Egypt, pp.: 329 - 339.
McGowan, M.W.; Artiss, J.D., Standbergh, D.R. and Zak, B.A. (1983).  Peroxidase-coupled method for colorimetric determination of serum triglycerides. Clin. Chem., 29: 538.
Merck, E. (1976). Labordiagnostik in der Tiermedizin. Diagnostica Merck, Darmstad, Deutschland.                                                                                                   
NRC (1993).  Nutrient requirements of fish.  National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
Patton, F.G. and Grouch, S.R. (1977).  Colorimetric determination of urea Anal. Chem. 49, 464.
SAS (1996).  SAS/STAT Guide for personal computer. SAS Inst. Cary, N. C.
Sivakami, S. and Ayyappan, S. (1991).  Influence of different feeds on the body composition of silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix Cultured in cages.  National Symposium on New Hortzons in Freshwater Aquaculture, 22 - 25 January, 1991. Proceeoings, pp. 92 - 94.
Tacon, A.G. (1997).  Global trends in aquaculture and aquafeed production 1984- 1995. Int. Aquafeed Directory and Buyer's Guide 1987/1988, pp. 5-37.
Tietz, N.W. (1986).  Textbook of clinical chemistry.  W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1271.
Tietz, N.W. (1990).  Clinical Guide to Laboratory Tests 2nd ed.  Philadelphia.
Trinder, P. (1969).  Ann. Clin. Biochem., 6: 24.
Tseng, W.Y. and K.L. Chan (1982).  The reproductive biology of the rabbit fish in Hong Kong. J. World Maricul. Soc., 13: 313-321.
Varley, H. (1978). Practical Clinical Biochemistry. 4th ed., Arnold-Heinemann Publishers (India).                                                                                            
Young, D.S. (1990).  Effects of drugs on clinical laboratory tests.  3rd ed. 3: 6.
Related topics:
Authors:
A.M. Abdelhamid
Mansoura University, Egypt
Mansoura University, Egypt
Recommend
Comment
Share
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Aquaculture
Chris Beattie
Chris Beattie
MSD - Merck Animal Health
Global Head of Aquaculture at Merck Animal Health
United States
Jorge Arias
Jorge Arias
Alltech
United States
Gary J. Burtle
Gary J. Burtle
University of Georgia
University of Georgia
Associate Professor/Extension Specialist
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.