Explore
Communities in English
Advertise on Engormix

Natural oil blend formulation as an anti-African swine fever virus agent in in vitro primary porcine alveolar macrophage culture

Published: November 4, 2021
By: Quang Lam Truong 1, Lan Thi Nguyen 1, Haig Yousef Babikian 2, Rajeev Kumar Jha 2, Hoa Thi Nguyen 1 and Thanh Long To 1 / 1 Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, Vietnam; 2 Department of Research and Development, PT. Rhea Natural Sciences, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Introduction
African swine fever virus (ASFV) reported as deadly for pigs. It is listed as a “notifiable disease” by the OIE due to high illness rates and a high mortality rate, up to 100%, and substantial financial losses [1-3]. Further spread of ASF to China has had disastrous consequences, especially instead of the fact that China contains more than half of the world’s pig population [4]. To date, as far as Vietnam is concerned, ASF has appeared in all 63 provinces of Vietnam, has destroyed more than 5.6 million pigs (more than 20% of total pigs), has decreased pork production by 8.3%, and has affected mainly smallscale farms [5-8].
The typical signs and symptoms of ASF are high fever, decreased appetite and weakness, difficulty in standing, red or blue blotches on the skin (particularly around ears and snout), and, especially in sows, the symptoms of miscarriage, stillbirths, and weak litters can occur [9,10]. Like, diarrhea, vomiting, and difficulty breathing or coughing, the symptoms can also occur with the disease [9]. ASFV is a large, enveloped and structurally complex DNA virus with the Asfarviridae family’s icosahedral morphology. The virus can persist for a long time in the environment, carcasses, and various swine products. The vectors and carriers of the ASF virus are warthogs (Phacochoerus africanus), bush pigs (Potamochoerus porcus and Potamochoerus larvatus), and soft ticks (Ornithodoros moubata) [4] in which the virus is transmitted trans-staidly and through transovarial routes [9].
The role of natural oils as antiviral components is well known. As a standardized compound, natural products are significant components with antiviral properties [11]. A formulation was developed by blending three natural oils, Eucalyptus globulus, Pinus sylvestris, and Lavandula latifolia, with antiviral properties. Cineole, the significant component of eucalyptus oil, has potent anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial properties [12]. Cineole is well known to treat the respiratory tract’s primary viral infections [13,14]. Linalool, a significant lavender oil component, has shown antiviral activities [15-17]. Isobornyl acetate extracted from pine oil has anti-microbial properties [14].
In the present study, the natural oil blend formulation’s (NOBF) efficacy was evaluated against ASFV using porcine alveolar macrophage (PAM) cells of swine in an in vitro medium.
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval
The protocols for pig euthanization and lung collection for isolation of primary PAM cells from healthy pigs and in vitro study were approved by the Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Vietnam.
Study location and period
In this trial, we selected 7-10-week-old healthy pigs negative for ASFV, PCV2, CSFV, PRRSV, and negative for ASFV Ab for isolation of PAM cells. The animals were housed and used in an isolated area in the Biosecurity Animal Facility Centre of the Vietnam National University of Agriculture (VNUA), Hanoi, Vietnam. The study was conducted from October 2019 to January 2020.
NOBF development
A formulation was developed by mixing an essential oil blend using three oils, E. globulus, P. sylvestris, and L. latifolia, in a determined concentration. The oils, E. globulus, P. sylvestris, and L. latifolia, obtained from the vendors who comply with the strictest industry practices: Demeter Agro Research and Improvements Pty Ltd., Australia, New Directions Australia Pty Ltd., Australia, and Australian Botanical Products Pty Ltd, Australia. Each natural oil is obtained through the steam distillation process and should undergo thorough checking for the quality and chemical compositions based on European Pharmacopeia. After the natural oils are declared to pass the quality checking, the mixture of the NOBF conducted with the following sequence and percentage: E. globulus, P. sylvestris, and L. latifolia are added in equal quantities to form the NOBF.
We followed a 2-fold dilution procedure to obtain the optimum dose of the application. The NOBF was serially diluted from 2.5 mL to 0.000078 mL (dilution 1 to dilution 16) to perform the in vitro trials.
Toxicity test of NOBF
The formulation was pre-tested on animals for toxicity and tolerance level. The toxicity level of NOBF was tested at two levels. The first level test was performed in the PAM cells, whereas the tolerance level of NOBF was tested in live pigs. The NOBF in 16 double-fold dilutions of 2.5 mL-0.000078 mL was mixed with the PAM cells and the ASFV. The cell viability was tested under a microscope at every 24 h interval.
Active ingredient identification in NOBF
The gas chromatography technique was used to extract and identify the active ingredients with anti-ASFV properties. Gas Agilent 6890 and 7890 Gas Chromatography-Flame Ionization Detector Shimadzu GC 2014 analysis was conducted at the Faculty of Pharmacy Laboratory at the University of Indonesia. The details of the standards used in this analysis are as follows:
a) Standard 1,8-Cineole
Natural oil blend formulation as an anti-African swine fever virus agent in in vitro primary porcine alveolar macrophage culture - Image 1
Formula: C10H18O
Molecular weight: 154.25 g/mol
CAS-No.: 470-82-6
Product number: C80601
Brand: Sigma-Aldrich, USA
b) Standard linalool
Natural oil blend formulation as an anti-African swine fever virus agent in in vitro primary porcine alveolar macrophage culture - Image 2
Formula: C10H18O
Molecular weight: 154.25 g/mol
CAS-No.: 126-91-0
EC-No.: 204-811-2
Product NUMBER: 74856
Brand: Sigma-Aldrich
c) Standard isobornyl acetate
Natural oil blend formulation as an anti-African swine fever virus agent in in vitro primary porcine alveolar macrophage culture - Image 3
Formula: C12H20O2
Molecular weight: 196.29 g/mol
CAS-No.: 125-12-2
EC-No.: 204-727-6
Product number: W216003
Brand: Sigma-Aldrich
Primary PAM cells
Our team collected the primary PAMs from 7-week-old healthy pigs (negative for ASFV, PCV2, CSFV, and PRRSV). We maintained the cells in the growth medium, including an RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; Gibco) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution (Gibco) at 37°C with 5% CO2. We also prepared red blood cells from EDTA-treated swine blood using Percoll (GE Healthcare, USA) and kept it in an RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco), 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution, and maintained it at 4°C until use.
ASFV preparation
The VNUA-ASFV-L01/HN/04/19 virus strain was isolated from a pig with apparent symptoms in Thai Binh Province, Vietnam. The virus strain was purified and quantified in the molecular biology laboratory of VNUA, Vietnam. The lethal and sublethal doses were optimized in the controlled conditions. The ASFV strain VNUA01/04.2019 was adapted to grow in PAMs and further passaged in PAMs. The stock used in the present study was obtained after the 15th passage. Briefly, the PAMs were infected at a multiplicity of infection of 0.1 with VNUA-ASFV-L01/ HN/04/19 in the growth medium, including an RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution. We added to each well the maintenance medium containing an RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5% FCS, 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution, and 2% suspension of red blood cells. The team performed the ASFV titration on the PAMs cultures in 96-well plates. The presence of ASFV was assessed by hemadsorption (HAD). The observation of HAD was for 5 days, and the calculation of 50% HAD observation (HAD50) was performed using the method described by Reed et al. [18] and King et al. [19].
Antiviral activity of NOBF using an in vitro medium
PAMs were grown on 48-well tissue culture plates using a growth medium, including an RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution. The NOBF was serially 2-fold diluted (Table-1) in a warmed RPMI 1640 to prepare the working stocks after 3 h of incubation of serially 2-fold diluted NOBF with VNUA-ASFV-L01/ HN/05/19.
The ASF virus dose 105 HAD50 in the ratio of 1:1, duplicate cultures were infected with the corresponding virus in a diluted volume of a medium containing the NOBF at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 for 1 h (Table-1 and Figure-1). The culture was added to the maintenance medium and incubated until a massive cytopathic effect, such as HAD or rosette formation. Rosette formation was observed daily by an inverted microscope for 4-5 days. After four freeze-thaw cycles, the supernatants were assessed for the ASFV virus by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the OIE manual’s recommendations described by Jürgen et al. [20].
Results
The active ingredient NOBF The gas chromatography technique measures the active ingredients present in the blended oil. By comparing with chromatographs of pure standards,GC analysis identified the presence of antiviral compounds, namely, (A) cineole, (B) linalool, and (C) isobornyl acetate in the NOBF (Figure-2). The result shows that cineole was present at a retention time of 3.048 min with a relative percentage area of peak around 99.4%, making it the primary compound in the NOBF. The second compound identified is linalool at a retention time of 5.966 min and a relative percentage peak around 0.31%. The minor compound identified is isobornyl acetate at a retention time of 3.767 and a relative percentage area of peak around 0.28% (Table-2).
Toxicity test and efficacy of NOBF in PAMs culture against ASFV
The toxicity of the NOBF in PAMs cultures was tested in PAM cells along with the trial. PAM cell death was recorded up to dilution six at 36 h of observation. Cell death occurred in dilution seven wells at 48 h and dilution eight at 72 h of culture. No PAM cells died in dilution nine and onward until the last observation at 120 h. The obtained results show that the NOBF in dilutions 1-6, that is, up to 0.08 mL, inhibited the growth of PAM cells (Figures-3 and 4).
Natural oil blend formulation as an anti-African swine fever virus agent in in vitro primary porcine alveolar macrophage culture - Image 4
Natural oil blend formulation as an anti-African swine fever virus agent in in vitro primary porcine alveolar macrophage culture - Image 5
Natural oil blend formulation as an anti-African swine fever virus agent in in vitro primary porcine alveolar macrophage culture - Image 6
Figure-1: Diagrammatic illustration of in vitro trial steps preparation. RPMI media, natural oil blend formulation, and African swine fever virus prepared and mixed using 2-fold dilution method. No virus was mixed in negative control. Microscopic observation was made at 0 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h, and 130 h intervals.
The detailed stepwise observation at 96 h post-infection occurred as follows:
In vitro observation showed that the NOBF up to dilution 13 or 0.000625 mL could inhibit or degenerate ASFV at a titer of 105 HAD50 in the PAMs culture (Table-1). No HAD or rosette was observed up to 130 h post-infection (Figure-3 and 4) whereas positive controls showed a large number of rosettes formation.
Real-time PCR analysis of in vitro trial
After four freeze-thaw cycles of PAMs, the supernatants were collected and applied for total DNA extraction, then used for real-time PCR [20]. The real-time PCR results (Ct value) indicated that the virulent ASFV strain could not replicate or was denatured in the PAMs cultures (Table-3). No difference in Ct value obtained in the initial ASFV input control compared to the natural oil blend group at dilutions 10, 11, and 12 after 130 h post-infection in PAMs (Table-3). Remarkably, the difference in the natural oil blend group’s Ct value was statistically significant compared with the ASFV-positive control group (Table-3).
Natural oil blend formulation as an anti-African swine fever virus agent in in vitro primary porcine alveolar macrophage culture - Image 7
Figure-2: Gas chromatography-flame ionization detector chromatogram of natural oil blend formulation (NOBF). (a) Chromatogram of complete NOBF compound’s peak, that is, cineole, linalool, and isobornyl acetate, (b) Chromatogram of cineole from NOBF, (c) chromatogram of linalool from NOBF, and (d) chromatogram of isobornyl acetate from NOBF.
Discussion
African swine fever is a highly contagious fatal acute hemorrhagic viral disease of pigs that currently have no treatment or vaccination protocol. It threatens the pig industry worldwide. For farmers, managing recent outbreaks of infectious viral diseases remain a significant worldwide problem, and there is a need to find substances with intracellular and extracellular antiviral properties [21-26]. The ASFV precisely activates the Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Rad3-related (ATR) pathway in ASFV-infected swine monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) in the early phase of infection, most probably because the ASFV genome is recognized as foreign DNA [27]. They also detected morphological changes of promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies, nuclear speckles, and Cajal bodies found in ASFV-infected swine MDMS. It suggests the process of viral modulation of cellular antiviral responses and cellular transcription. It was demonstrated that in vitro inhibition of ASFV-topoisomerase II disrupts viral replications, contributing to natural strategies for vaccine candidate development [28].
The in vitro level trials using the NOBF were conducted to evaluate its efficacy against ASFV. The natural oil blend had antiviral properties and deactivated the virus [29-31]. The antiviral activity of all the natural oils tested could be demonstrated for the enveloped viruses. Lavender natural oil consists primarily of monoterpenoids and sesquiterpenoids and linalool dominate, with moderate levels of lavandulyl acetate, terpinen-4-ol, and lavandulol. 1,8-cineole and camphor are also present in low to moderate qualities. Linalol has anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory, and mood alleviating effects [32- 34]. Pine oil consists mainly of alpha-terpineol or cyclic terpene alcohols and isobornyl acetate. Pine oil is a phenolic disinfectant that is mildly antiseptic and has anti-fungal, antibacterial, and antiviral properties due to isobornyl acetate [33,34]. Eucalyptus oil has a history of full application as a pharmaceutical, antiseptic, repellent, flavoring, fragrance, and industrial use. Eucalyptus oil has antibacterial, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory effects. The pre-clinical results also show that eucalyptus oil stimulates the innate cell-mediated immune response by its effects on the phagocytic ability of human MDMs [31-37]. Cineole present in eucalyptus oil shows potential antiviral activity against herpesvirus and yellow fever virus. Its activity has also been established against viral envelope structures [34,35]. The natural oils affect the viral envelope, which is necessary for adsorption or entry into host cells. In particular, monoterpenes have shown increased cell membrane fluidity and permeability, altering membrane proteins’ order [38-41].
The quantity log 5 of the VNUA-ASFV-L01/ HN/04/19 virus strain ASFV is considered the lethal dose that can kill the pigs in 7-10 days intramuscular challenge. The evaluation of in vitro antiviral activities of natural substances is based mainly on the inhibition of cytopathic effects, the reduction or inhibition of plaque formation, and the reduction in the virus yield [21].
Natural oil blend formulation as an anti-African swine fever virus agent in in vitro primary porcine alveolar macrophage culture - Image 8
Natural oil blend formulation as an anti-African swine fever virus agent in in vitro primary porcine alveolar macrophage culture - Image 9
Figure-3: The illustration shows the result outcome of in vitro test. The inhibitory dose of the natural oil blend formulation (NOBF) was observed from dilution 1-7. The optimum and effective dose of NOBF against African swine fever virus (ASFV) was observed from dilutions 8-13. The less effective dose started from dilutions 14. The different dilutions of negative control (without ASFV) indicated the inhibitory and not-inhibitory doses of NOBF on porcine alveolar macrophages cells.
The PAM cells were isolated from the pathogen-free clean piglets.  The characteristic feature of the cells infected with ASFV wildtype is the ability to adsorb swine erythrocytes (haemadsorption - HAD) on its surface [40]. This feature was successfully exploited to differentiate the ASF virus from other agents that produce diseases with symptoms that are likely to be confused with those observed in ASF and develop specific ASF virus titration [42]. Erythrocyte rosettes formation around infected blood swine monocytes is a characteristic feature of ASFV-infected cells [43,44]. It is considered the standard HAD test for many ASFV isolates
The real-time PCR results showed no growth of the virus in the NOBF groups indicated from the similar Ct value. In comparison, the Ct value of positive control reduced, which indicated the spontaneous increase in viral copy number [20].
The obtained results showed the way in the process of anti-ASFV component development. Hence, the anti-ASFV developed components, either live-attenuated vaccine or recombinant vaccine, have not shown efficacy in the field [45-49]. The immediate next step would be to evaluate and optimize the efficacy of NOBF against ASFV in the pig.
Natural oil blend formulation as an anti-African swine fever virus agent in in vitro primary porcine alveolar macrophage culture - Image 10
Figure-4: (a) Representative microscopic images of positive control, that is, porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) cells inoculated with African swine fever virus. (b) Representative microscopic images of negative control, that is, PAM cells not inoculated with African swine fever virus. (c) Representative microscopic images of PAM cells inoculated with African swine fever virus treated in dilution 11or 250 ppm of natural oil blend formulation for 130 h. (c) Images were taken on Leica DM IL LED microscope at 200×
Conclusion
The present study highlights the role of natural oil extracts in virus eradication. In this study, we try to demonstrate that the NOBF can degenerate the ASFV in PAM cells medium. The trial outcome is summarized in the following way: The NOBF application deactivated the ASF virus at the lowest concentration of 0.000635 mL. As a continuation of the study, the next step is to conduct in vivo trials to optimize the dose and delivery route of the NOBF and to establish it as an anti-ASFV candidate.
This article was originally published in Veterinary World, 14(3): 794-802. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

1. Rowlands, R.J., Michaud, V., Heath, L., Hutchings, G.,
Oura, C., Vosloo, W., Dwarka, R., Onashvili, T., Albina, E. and Dixon, L.K. (2008) African swine fever virus isolate,
Georgia, 2007. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 14(12): 1870-1874.
2. Penrith, M.L., Vosloo, W., Jori, F. and Bastos, A.D.S. (2013)
African swine fever virus eradication in Africa. Virus Res.,
173: 228-246.
3. Halasa, T., Bøtner, A., Mortensen, S., Christensen, H.,
Toft, N. and Boklund, A. (2016) Simulating the epidemiological and economic effects of an African swine fever epidemic in industrialized swine populations. Vet.
Microbiol., 193:
4. Sánchez-Cordón, P.J., Montoya, M., Reis, A.L. and
Dixon, L.K. (2018) African swine fever: A re-emerging viral disease threatening the global pig industry. Vet. J.,
233: 41-48.
5. World Organization for Animal Health. (2019) Terrestrial
Animal Health Code. World Organization for Animal, Paris.
6. World Organization for Animal Health. (2019) Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals.
World Organization for Animal Health, Paris.
7. World Organisation for Animal Health. (2020b) Available from: https://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/ reviewreport/review?page_refer=mapfulleven-treport&reportid=34283. Retrieved on 19-10-2020.
8. World Organization for Animal Health. (2020a) African
Swine Fever (ASF) Report No. 52: August 21-September
03, 2020. World Animal Health Information Department,
World Organization for Animal Health, Paris, France.
9. Jassim S.A. and Naji M.A. (2003) Novel antiviral agents:
A medicinal plant perspective. J. Appl. Microbiol., 95(3):
412-427.
10. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2018) African Swine
Fever Threatens Peoples Republic of China. Animal Health
Risk Analysis, Assessment No. 5. Food and Agriculture
Organization, Rome, Italy.
11. Juergens, U. (2014) Anti-inflammatory properties of the monoterpene 1.8-cineole: Current evidence for co-medication in inflammatory airway diseases. Drug Res., 64(12):
638-646.
12. Wang, L.H., Madera, R., Li, Y.Z., McVey, S.D.,
Drolet, B.S. and Shi, J. (2020) Recent advances in the diagnosis of classical swine fever and future perspectives.
Pathogens, 9(8): 658.
13. Li, X.D., Zhang, C., Qiao, M.M., Guo, J.S., Xing, G.Y., Jin,
C.X., Wang, J., Sun, M. and Tian, K. (2018) Molecular epidemiology of porcine circovirus Type 3 infection in swine herds in China. Virol. Sin., 33(4): 373-377.
14. Choi, H.J. (2018) Chemical constituents of essential oils possessing anti-influenza A/WS/33 virus activity. Osong
Public Health Res. Perspect., 9(6): 348-353.
15. Takizawa, T., Nakashima, K., Namihira, M., Ochiai, W.,
Uemura, A., Yanagisawa, M., Fujita, N., Nakao, M. and
Taga, T. (2001) DNA methylation is a critical cell-intrinsic determinant of astrocyte differentiation in the fetal brain.
Dev. Cell, 1(6): 749-758.
16. Chenais, E., Ståhl, K., Guberti, V. and Depner, K. (2018)
Identification of wild boar-habitat epidemiologic cycle in
African swine fever epizootic. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 24(4): 810.
17. Probst, C., Gethmann, J., Amler, S., Globig, A., Knoll, B. and Conraths, F.J. (2019) The potential role of scavengers in spreading African swine fever among wild boar. Sci. Rep.,
9(1): 11450.
18. Reed, L.J. and Muench, H.A. (1938) Simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am. J. Hyg., 27(3): 493-497.
19. King, D.P., Reid, S.M., Hutchings, G.H., Grierson, S.S.,
Wilkinson, P.J., Dixon, L.K., Bastos, A.D.S. and Drew, T.W. (2003) Development of a TaqMan® PCR assay with internal amplification control for the detection of African swine fever virus. J. Virol. Methods, 107(1): 53-61.
20. Jürgen, R., Schnitzler, P., Suschke, U. and Saller, R. (2009)
Essential oils of aromatic plants with antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, and cytotoxic properties an overview. Forsch.
Komplement. Med., 16(2): 79-90.
21. Simoes, M., Martins, C. and Ferreira, F. (2015) Early intranuclear replication of African swine fever virus genome modifies the landscape of the host cell nucleus. Virus Res.,
210: 1-356.
22. Chenais, E., Boqvist, S., Sternberg-Lewerin, S.,
Emanuelson,U., Ouma, E., Dione, M., Aliro, T., Crafoord, F.,
Masembe, C. and Stahl, K. (2017a) Knowledge, attitudes and practices related to African swine fever within smallholder pig production in Northern Uganda. Transbound.
Emerg. Dis., 64(1): 101-115.
23. Chenais, E., Boqvist, S., Emanuelson, U., von Bromssen, C.,
Ouma, E., Aliro, T., Masembe, C., Stahl, K. and SternbergLewerin, S. (2017b) Quantitative assessment of social and economic impact of African swine fever outbreaks in
Northern Uganda. Prev. Vet. Med., 144(1): 134-148.
24. Beltrán-Alcrudo, D., Arias, M., Gallardo, C., Kramer, S. and Penrith, M.L. (2017) African Swine Fever: Detection and Diagnosis a Manual for Veterinarians. FAO Animal
Production and Health Manual No. 19. Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations, Rome. p88.
25. Depner, K., Gortazar, C., Guberti, V., Masiulis, M., More, S. and Oļševskis, E. (2017) Epidemiological analyses of
African swine fever in the Baltic states and Poland. EFSA
J., 15(11): 5068.
26. Cappai, S., Rolesu, S., Coccollone, A, Laddomada, A. and
Loi, F. (2018) Evaluation of biological and socio-economic factors related to persistence of African swine fever in
Sardinia. Prev. Vet. Med., 152(1): 1-11.
27. Simoes, M., Ferreira, F.B., Leitao, A., Martins, C. and
Ferreira, F. (2019) African swine fever virus replication events and cell nucleus: New insights and perspectives.
Virus Res., 270: 197667.
28. Gostner, J.M., Ganzera, M., Becker, K., Geisler, S.,
Schroecksnadel, S., Überall, F., Schennach, H. and Fuchs, D. (2014). Lavender oil suppresses indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity in human PBMC. BMC Complement. Altern.
Med., 14: 503.
29. Shellie, R., Mondello, L., Philip, M. and Giovanni, D. (2002) Characterization of lavender essential oils by using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with correlation of linear retention indices and comparison with comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr.
A, 970(1-2): 225-234.
30. Juergens, U.R., Dethlefsen, U., Steinkamp, G., Gillissen,A.,
Repges, R. and Vetter, H. (2003) Anti-inflammatory activity of 1.8-cineol (eucalyptol) in bronchial asthma: A double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Respir. Med., 97(3):
250-256.
31. Juergens, U.R., Engelen, T., Racké, K., Stöber, M.,
Gillissen, A. and Vetter, H. (2004) Inhibitory activity of
1,8-cineol (eucalyptol) on cytokine production in cultured human lymphocytes and monocytes. Pulm. Pharmacol.
Ther., 17(5): 281-287.
32. Serafino, A., Vallebona, P.S., Andreola, F., Zonfrillo, M.,
Mercuri, L., Federici, M., Rasi, G., Garaci, E. and
Pierimarchi, P. (2008) Stimulatory effect of Eucalyptus essential oil on innate cell-mediated immune response.
BMC Immunol., 9: 17.
33. Göbel, H., Schmidt, G. and Soyka, D. (1994) Effect of peppermint and Eucalyptus oil preparations on neurophysiological and experimental algesimetric headache parameters.
Cephalalgia, 14(3): 228-234.
34. Astani, A., Reichling, J. and Schnitzler, P. (2010)
Comparative study on the antiviral activity of selected monoterpenes derived from essential oils. Phytother. Res.,
24(5): 673-679.
35. Karger, A., Pérez-Núñez, D., Urquiza, J., Hinojar, P.,
Alonso, C., Freitas, F.B., Revilla, Y., Le Potier, M.F. and
Montoya, M. (2019) An update on african swine fever virology. Viruses, 8(9): 864-878.
36. Yoo, D., Kim, H., Lee, J.Y. and Yoo, H.S. (2020) African swine fever: Etiology, epidemiological status in Korea, and perspective on control. J. Vet. Sci., 21(2): 38.
37. Salguero, F.J. (2020) Comparative pathology and pathogenesis of African swine fever infection in swine. Front. Vet.
Sci., 19(7): 282-295.
38. Hess, W.R., Endris, R.G., Haslett, T.M., Monahan, M.J. and
McCoy, J.P. (1987) Potential arthropod vectors of African swine fever virus in North America and the Caribbean basin. Vet. Parasitol., 26(1-2): 145-155.
39. do, I. and Alonso, C. (2017) African swine fever virus: A review. Viruses, 9(5): 103.
40. Gallardo, C., Fernández-Pinero, J. and Arias, M. (2019)
African swine fever (ASF) diagnosis, an essential tool in the epidemiological investigation. Virus Res., 271(10): 197676.
41. Dixon, L.K., Islam, M., Nash, R. and Reis, A.L. (2019)
African swine fever virus evasion of host defences. Virus
Res., 266(1): 25-33.
42. Juszkiewicz, M., Walczak, M., Mazur-Panasiuk, N. and
Woźniakowski, G. (2019) Virucidal effect of chosen disinfectants against African swine fever virus (ASFV) preliminary studies. Pol. J. Vet. Sci., 22(4): 777-780.
43. Kouam, M.K., Jacouba, M. and Moussala, J.O. (2020)
Management and biosecurity practices on pig farms in the
Western Highlands of Cameroon (Central Africa). Vet. Med.
Sci., 6(1): 82-91.
44. Revilla, Y., Perez-Nunez, D. and Richt, J.A. (2018) African swine fever virus biology and vaccine approaches. Adv.
Virus Res., 100(1): 41-44.
45. Gallardo, C., Sánchez, E.G., Pérez-Núñez, D., Nogal, M., de León, P., Carrascosa, Á.L. and Revilla, Y. (2018a).
African swine fever virus (ASFV) protection mediated by
NH/P68 and NH/P68 recombinant live-attenuated viruses.
Vaccine, 36(19): 2694-2704.
46. Reis, A.L., Abrams, C.C., Goatley, L.C., Netherton, C.,
Chapman, D.G., Sanchez-Cordon, P. and Dixon, L.K. (2016). Deletion of African swine fever virus interferon inhibitors from the genome of a virulent isolate reduces virulence in domestic pigs and induces a protective response.
Vaccine, 34(39): 4698-4705.
47. Reis, A.L., Goatley, L.C., Jabbar, T., Pedro, J., SanchezCordon, P.J., Christopher, L. and Dixon, L.K. (2017b)
Deletion of the African swine fever virus gene DP148R does not reduce virus replication in culture but reduces virus virulence in pigs and induces high levels of protection against challenge. J. Virol., 91(24): e01428-17.
48. Sánchez-Cordón, P.J., Jabbar, T., Berrezaie, M.,
Chapman, D., Reis, A., Sastre, P. and Dixon, L.K. (2018b)
Evaluation of protection induced by immunisation of domestic pigs with deletion mutant African swine fever virus BeninΔMGF by different doses and routes. Vaccine,
36(5): 707-715.
49. Gallardo, C., Soler, A., Rodze, L., Nieto, R., CanoGómez, C., Jovita Fernandez-Pinero, J. and Arias, M. (2018b). Attenuated and non-haemadsorbing (non-HAD) genotype II African swine fever virus (ASFV) isolated in
Europe, Latvia 2017. Trans. Emerg. Dis., 66(3):1399-1404.

Related topics:
Authors:
Yousef Babikian
Rajeev Jha
Recommend
Comment
Share
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.