Infectious Laryngotracheitis (ILT) - Respiratory Herpes Virus of Poultry
Published:January 22, 2008
Source :OMAFRA Livestock Release
Infectious Laryngotracheitis (ILT) is usually considered to be a backyard flock problem. However, this disease continues to plague the poultry industry with sporadic episodes across the province of Ontario. Due to the persistent, latent, infectious nature of the virus, it can perpetuate itself, even after vaccination. Rolling reaction from chicken embryo origin (CEO) vaccines and transmission from backyard flocks keeps the industry at high alert for this disease. ILT is on the list of four notifiable diseases at the request of the importing nations, China and Russia. This reminds our industry to control it now.
ILT is an acute herpes viral respiratory tract infection of chickens and pheasants that may result in severe production losses. Losses occur due to excessive mortality, decreased growth rates and decreased egg production. Disease may affect 5 to 80% of an exposed flock, taking 2 to 4 weeks to go through an entire flock. Infected birds usually die but can recover within 7 to 10 days. Mortality can climb as high as 20% in an infected flock.
Signs of infection appear 6 to 12 days after infection and are characterised by mild to severe clinical reactions. Signs include:
* conjunctivitis, watery eyes and swollen orbital sinuses. * coughing, sneezing, extended neck, laboured, breathing, wheezing and head shaking. * bloody exudate on the walls of cages or pens from severe cases.
Infection is usually spread by aerosol. The route of infection is through the upper respiratory tract, where the virus replicates in the trachea and the larynx. Other portals of entry include contact of the virus with the eyes and ingestion of the virus. Mechanical transmission can occur via contaminated equipment, clothing, boots, dead stock and litter.
Control focuses on management practices, emphasising strict biosecurity. Due to vaccination potential to cause disease, veterinary supervision is strongly recommended when the decision is made to go this route. Since both natural infection and vaccination have been shown to produce "carrier" birds, it is extremely important that susceptible chicken flocks are not exposed to vaccinated or previously infected chickens. Mixing of birds should only be done when a complete history of the birds is available, and it is absolutely certain that a potential ILT "carrier" is not present. Sanitation procedures, which include disinfection of equipment, boots and clothing and proper disposal of litter and carcasses, are essential components of ILT control.
It should be emphasised that it is always recommended that producers work with their poultry veterinarian for diagnosis and to develop treatment and prevention/vaccination strategies.
Submission of samples to the Animal Health Laboratory should be representative of the problem on the farm or backyard flock. Your history sheet, submitted with the birds, should include: the type of operation, the number of birds at risk, the number of birds affected and the vaccination history. Submit tissues from separate birds in tightly sealed and labelled Whirl-Pak bags for rapid distribution to the designated laboratory sections. For histology, use formalin fixed sections of trachea, larynx and bronchioles. For isolation of ILT virus, trachea and lung are required.
By Scott Gillingham - Veterinary Scientist/OMAFRA Ministry of Agiculture, Food and Rural Affairs
Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University
2 de febrero de 2008
Dear Sir, A student Mr. Syedkaleemuhassan raised a question that, could the vaccinated birds act as a carrier or/not, and if do so should we not use the vaccination strategy or can. With regarding on this I would say that while preparing the vaccine some ingredients such as virus/bacteria that would be the source of antigen, adjuvant to enhance the immunity and to produce a depo at the site of vaccination, etc. are being added. This produced vaccines may be killed/live or attenuated, accordingly they are processed and become marketed for livestock purposes. While processing vaccination the virulent factors that could cause disease and so to produce death is inactivated/killed by any means that defines only the antigenic nature of the organism would be retained by eliminating all other determinants that are responsible to produce disease. In this case, if the vaccine is not prepared upto the level of standard or inactivation or attenuation is not done accurately. the vaccine may carry the disease producting property and so, there is no doubt that vaccinated birds would act as a carrier and it is implied. Moreover, the virus/bacteria should not have any mutating property in itself and this wouldl also can modify the antigenic property and may cause the disease.
Please do send the isolation procedures of ILT from field outbraeks
Recommend
Reply
M.V.L.N.Raju
1 de agosto de 2008
Well, ILT is a herpesvirus and latency is the characterisic feature of this virus. Among recovered birds and even birds vaccinated with a live vaccine, the ILTV can become latent and the birds become carriers. Thus birds which appear healthy may excreate the virus intermittently (reactivation) for long periods. Because vaccination can result in latently infected carrier birds, it is recommended for use only in geograpic areas where the disease is endemic.
M.R. Reddy, PhD, MACVS
Senior scientist
Project Directorate on Poultry
Hyderabad-500 030
Recommend
Reply
syedkaleemulhassan
23 de enero de 2008
I am a little confused that vaccination also makes the bird CARRIER, and the susceptible birds should not mix with them?
Does it mean we shouldn't practice the vaccination and be concentrated on biosecurity measures?
Recommend
Reply
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.