Major source for the content of this newsletter, and recommended reading: Riber, A. B., H. A. van de Weerd, I. C. de Jong, and S. Steenfeldt. 2018. Review of environmental enrichment for broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 97:378–396. Available at http://academic.oup.com/ps/article/97/2/378/4683676.
References used
Ö. Altan, C. Seremet, H. Bayraktar. The effect of early environmental enrichment on performance, fear and physiological responses to acute stress of broiler. Arch. Geflügelkd., 77 (2013), pp. 23-28.
C. Arnould, D. Bizeray, J.M. Faure, C. Leterrier. Effects of the addition of sand and string to pens on use of space, activity, tarsal angulations and bone composition in broiler chickens. Anim. Welf., 13 (2004), pp. 87-94.
C.L. Bailie, M.E.E Ball, N.E. O’Connell. Influence of the provision of natural light and straw bales on activity levels and leg health in commercial broiler chickens. Animal., 7 (2013), pp. 618-626.
C.L.Bailie, O’Connell N.E., 2016. Perch design preferences of commercial broiler chickens reared in windowed houses. Proc. EAAP 67th Annual Meeting. Aug. 29-Sept. 1, Belfast, Ireland. P397.
A.W. Bassler, C. Arnould, A. Butterworth, L. Colin, I.C. de Jon, V. Ferrante, P. Ferrari, S. Haslam, F. Wemelsfelder, H.H. Blokhuis. Potential risk factors associated with contact dermatitis, lameness, negative emotional state, and fear of humans in broiler chicken flocks. Poult. Sci., 92 (2013), pp. 2811-2826.
C.L. Bailie, N.E. O’Connell. The effect of level of straw bale provision on the behavior and leg health of commercial broiler chickens. Animal., 8 (2014), pp. 1715-1721.
M. Baxter, O’Connell, N. E., 2016. Commercial comparison of potential dustbathing substrates for intensively farmed broilers. Proc. EAAP 67th Annual Meeting. Aug. 29-Sept. 1, Belfast, Ireland. P398.
W. Bessei. Welfare of Broilers: a review. W. Poult. Sci. J., 62 (2006), pp. 455-466.
D. Bizeray, I. Estevez, C. Leterrier, J.M. Faure. Effects of increasing environmental complexity on the physical activity of broiler chickens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 79 (2002), pp. 27-41.
E.A.M. Bokkers, P. Koene. Behavior of fast- and slow-growing broilers to 12 weeks of age and the physical consequences. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 81 (2003), pp. 59-72.
R.H. Bradshaw, R.D. Kirkden, D.M. Broom. A review of the aetiology and pathology of leg weakness in broilers in relation to welfare. Avian Poult. Biol. Rev., 13 (2002), pp. 45-103.
T. Cornetto, I. Estevez. Behavior of the domestic fowl in the presence of vertical panels. Poult. Sci., 80 (2001), pp. 1455-1462.
T. Cornetto, I. Estevez. Influence of vertical panels on use of space by domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 71 (2001), pp. 141-153.
T. Cornetto, I. Estevez, L.W. Douglass. Using artificial cover to reduce aggression and disturbances in domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 75 (2002), pp. 325-336.
M.S. Dawkins, C.A. Donnelly, T.A. Jones. Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature., 427 (2004), pp. 342-344.
EFSA. Scientific opinion on the influence of genetic parameters on the welfare and the resistance to stress of commercial broilers. EFSA J., 8 (2010), p. 1666. Doi.10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1666
A.L. Hall. The effect of stocking density on the welfare and behavior of broiler chickens reared commercially. Anim. Welf., 10 (2001), pp. 23-40.
R.B. Jones. 1989. Development and alleviation of fear. Proc. 3rd European Symposium on Poultry Welfare. Tours, France. P123-136.
E. Kaukonen, Norring M., Valros A., 2016. Using elevated platforms to improve broiler leg health on commercial broiler farms. Proc. 50th Congress of the International Society of Applied Ethology. June 12-15, Edinburgh, UK. P228.
A. Kells, M.S. Dawkins, M.C. Borja. The effect of ‘freedom food’ enrichment on the behavior of broilers on commercial farms. Anim. Welf., 10 (2001), pp. 347-356.
U. Knierim. Effects of stocking density on the behavior and bodily state of broilers fattened with a target live weight of 2 kg. Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wochensch., 126 (2013), pp. 149-155.
B.L. Neilson. Breast blisters in groups of slow-growing broilers in relation to strain and the availability and use of perches. Br. Poult. Sci., 45 (2004), pp. 306-315.
R.C. Newberry. Environmental enrichment – increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 44 (1995), pp. 229-243.
R.C. Newberry, D.M. Shackleton. Use of visual cover by domestic fowl: A Venetian blind effect? Anim. Behav., 54 (1997), pp. 387-395.
K. Reiter, W. Bessei. Effect of stocking density of broilers on temperature in the litter and at bird level. Arch. Geflügelkd., 64 (2000), pp. 204-206.
A.B. Riber, H.A. Van de Weerd, I.C. de Jong, S. Steenfeldt. Review of environmental enrichment for broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. J., 97 (2018), pp. 378-396.
V. Sandilands, C. Moinard, N.H.C. Sparks. Providing laying hens with perches: fulfilling behavioral needs but causing injury? Br. Poult. Sci., 50 (2009), pp. 395-406.
S. Syafwan, R.P. Kwakkel, M.W.A. Verstegen. Heat stress and feeding strategies in meat-type chickens. World. Poult. Sci. J., 67 (2011), pp. 653-673.
H.A. Van de Weerd, J. Day. A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 116 (2009), pp. 1-20.
B.A. Ventura, F. Siewerdt, I. Estevez. Effects of barrier perches and density on broiler leg health, fear, and performance. Poult. Sci., 89 (2010), pp. 1574-1583.
B.A. Ventura, F. Siewerdt, I. Estevez. Access to barrier perches improves behavior repertoire in broilers. PLoS ONE, 7 (2012), p. e29826.