Explore

Advertise on Engormix

Birds found outside sheds show less feather damage than birds found in sheds

Published: September 26, 2025
Source : S.M. KITESSA 1, K. DRAKE 1,2 and C.T. DE KONING 1 / 1 South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI), Roseworthy Campus, University of Adelaide, South Australia, 5371; 2 Royal New Zealand SPCA, Animal Welfare Science and Education Department, PO Box 15349, New Lynn, Auckland 0640, New Zealand.
An observational study conducted on three commercial layer farms showed that environmental enrichment increases number of birds on the range (see Dekoning et al. in this APSS Proceedings). In the same study, we aimed to determine if plumage damage score is different between birds found inside versus outside sheds. The farms were stocked with HyLine Brown flocks (all beak-trimmed); Farm-1 & Farm-3 had one shed each and Farm-2 had two sheds (all 3 farms & four flocks with a fixed range). Farms 1 & 3 had flock sizes of 3,000 and 11,700 hens, respectively, at a stocking density of 1,500/ha. Farm-2, had two flocks, each with 10,000 hens: Farm 2-1 at 10,000 hens/ha and Farm 2-2 at 1,500 hens/ha. Plumage damage score was conducted on 100 random birds inside and 100 random birds outside each shed. The AssureWel (http://www.assurewel.org) score system was used: 0 = no or minimal feather loss; 1 = slight feather loss; and 2 = moderate/severe feather loss. Plumage was scored (without catching) across five body parts: head/neck, back, base of tail/around preen gland, tail and wings. Plumage score per hen was summed (maximum of 10; 2 x 5). All farms were visited once a month for six months. In general, the average total plumage damage increased with age (P< 0.05); outdoor birds had significantly less (P< 0.05) damage than birds found inside (Fig. 1). The most severely affected body part was the neck region. When the total plumage score was categorized for the level of damage: No (0), Low (1-3), Medium (4-6) and Severe (≥7), well over 50% of birds on the range had No to Low damage across all farms. Furthermore, Flock 2-2, the oldest flock, had 80% of birds on the range with No to Low plumage damage. Conversely, there were fewer range birds in the Medium to Severe plumage damage range. We conclude that attracting birds out onto the range minimizes the level and severity of plumage damage in layer birds. Further, the benefit did not diminish with age of hens.
Figure 1 - Total plumage score observed on hens found inside and outside sheds across farms.
Figure 1 - Total plumage score observed on hens found inside and outside sheds across farms.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: We thank the Poultry CRC for providing funds, and the participant farmers for allowing us free access to their properties.
   
Presented at the 29th Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium 2018. For information on the latest and future editions, click here.
Content from the event:
Related topics:
Mentioned in this news release:
Soressa Kitessa
CSIRO
Kelly Drake
Carolyn De Koning
Recommend
Comment
Share
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Poultry Industry
Padma Pillai
Padma Pillai
Cargill
Cargill
United States
Shivaram Rao
Shivaram Rao
Pilgrim´s
PhD Director Principal de Nutrición y Servicios Técnicos de Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation
United States
Carolina Hall
Carolina Hall
Trouw Nutrition
United States