Engormix
Home
Search
Explore
Publish
Explore

Communities in English

AquacultureMycotoxinsPoultry IndustryPig IndustryDairy CattleAnimal Feed

AgriculturaBalanceados - PiensosAviculturaGanaderíaLecheríaMicotoxinasPorciculturaMascotas

MicotoxinasAviculturaSuinoculturaPecuária de cortePecuária de leite
Advertise on Engormix
Home
Publish
Search
Engormix.com / Poultry Industry / Poultry welfare

Beak to Toes: Impact, Causes, and Prevention of Toe Pecking in Laying Hens

Published: September 2, 2024
By: Gideon Ajibola and Dr. Marisa Erasmus, Purdue University. Reviewers: Dr. Greg Archer, Texas A&M University; Dr. Prafulla Regmi, University of Georgia; Dr. Shawna Weimer, University of Arkansas.
Beak to Toes: Impact, Causes, and Prevention of Toe Pecking in Laying Hens - Image 1
Damaging behaviors in poultry include feather pecking, vent pecking, and toe pecking. While feather and vent pecking are well-known welfare problems in poultry that have received significant attention from researchers and farmers, toe pecking remains relatively unknown. Therefore, this article aims to shed light on toe pecking.
Toe pecking (TP) occurs when a laying hen pecks at her toes or the toes of conspecifics, often resulting in toe wounds. Therefore, TP predisposes birds to toe injury and damage. Pain and distress have been associated with injury and wounds; consequently, TP can compromise the welfare of laying hens. In severe cases, toe pecking can affect up to 75% of a flock and cause as high as 10% mortality in TP-affected flocks, resulting in significant financial losses to growers.
Beak to Toes: Impact, Causes, and Prevention of Toe Pecking in Laying Hens - Image 1
  
Development of toe pecking
The onset of damaging behaviors in poultry has been associated with health concerns. Toe pecking typically emerges in groups of birds at 20 to 30 weeks of age, peaking between 30 and 50 weeks.
This pattern corresponds to transition periods to the layer barn following a rearing period in pullet barn and peak egg-laying, suggesting that TP development is associated with significant production stressors in a laying hen's life.
  
Impacts of toe pecking on laying hen welfare
Increased fearfulness
Laying hens experiencing toe wounds resulting from toe pecks may be more fearful of higher areas in their housing environment, such as the top tiers of a cage-free aviary system. Research has demonstrated that toe pecking victims take less time to descend from elevated platforms. This could stem from the discomfort and pain associated with toe injuries, causing hens to be cautious of walking activities that require extensive balance and coordination.
Increased stress levels
Toe-pecked hens have enlarged stress-responsive organs, particularly the adrenal glands. An increase in the size of these organs leads to an increase in stress hormone production. This indicates heightened stress levels in toe-pecked hens, which is an attempt by their system to cope with stressful situations.
Increased susceptibility to infection and diseases
Toe-pecked hens have elevated stress levels, which compromises their immune system and makes them more susceptible to diseases. On the other hand, open wounds provide potential entry points for pathogens, and these wounds could be easily infected. The combination of stress and open wounds can predispose hens to infectious diseases.
Impaired mobility
Toe damage is associated with reduced mobility and inability to walk properly. Impaired mobility is a significant concern for hens raised in non-cage housing systems because important resources, such as food and water, are usually located in areas that require the hens to navigate complex three-dimensional (3D) spatial configurations. Therefore, the inability of TP victims to adequately navigate their environment and utilize these resources could severely impair their welfare.
Beak to Toes: Impact, Causes, and Prevention of Toe Pecking in Laying Hens - Image 2
Beak to Toes: Impact, Causes, and Prevention of Toe Pecking in Laying Hens - Image 1
  
Summary
Toe pecking is an emerging welfare problem in laying hens housed in modern housing systems. Toe pecking may result in severe tissue damage and even death, leading to significant economic losses. In addition, birds receiving toe pecks may have elevated levels of fear and stress. Genetics, diet, lighting, toe wounds, health status, stress, and socialization have been proposed as factors associated with TP in layer flocks. A holistic approach that includes genetic, environmental, and management interventions is most likely to successfully prevent and alleviate TP in layer flocks, but more research will be valuable in providing solutions to this damaging behavior.
      
This article was originally published on Poultry Extension Collaborative (PEC) and it is reproduced here with permission from the authors.

Butterworth, A., & Weeks, C. (2009). The Impact of Disease on Welfare. The Welfare of Domestic Fowl and Other Captive Birds, 9, 189–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3650-6_8

Cloutier, S., Newberry, R. C., Honda, K., & Alldredge, J. R. (2002). Cannibalistic behaviour spread by social learning. Animal Behaviour, 63(6), 1153–1162. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.3017

Coria-Avila, G. A., Pfaus, J. G., Orihuela, A., Domínguez-Oliva, A., José-Pérez, N., Hernández, L. A., & Mota-Rojas, D. (2022). The Neurobiology of Behavior and Its Applicability for Animal Welfare: A Review. Animals : An Open Access Journal from MDPI, 12(7), 928. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12070928

De Haas, E. N., Newberry, R. C., Edgar, J., Riber, A. B., Estevez, I., Ferrante, V., Hernandez, C. E., Kjaer, J. B., Ozkan, S., Dimitrov, I., Rodenburg, T. B., & Janczak, A. M. (2021). Prenatal and Early Postnatal Behavioural Programming in Laying Hens, With Possible Implications for the Development of Injurious Pecking. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2021.678500

Dennis, R. L. (2016). Adrenergic and noradrenergic regulation of poultry behavior and production. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 56, S94–S100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2016.02.007

Gebhardt-Henrich, S. G., Mueller, S., Zanini, L., & Toscano, M. J. (2023). A survey about the welfare problem “toe pecking” in Swiss laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 259, 105854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2023.105854

Kjaer, J. B., & Bessei, W. (2013). The interrelationships of nutrition and feather pecking in the domestic fowl.

Krause, E. T., Petow, S., & Kjaer, J. (2011). A note on the physiological and behavioural consequences of cannibalistic toe pecking in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Archiv Fur Geflugelkunde, 75, 140–143.

Light of Evolution. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 95(6). https://doi.org/10.1159/000516787

Marchewka, J., Sztandarski, P., Zdanowska-Sąsiadek, Ż., Damaziak, K., Wojciechowski, F., Riber, A. B., & Gunnarsson, S. (2020). Associations between welfare and ranging profile in free-range commercial and heritage meat-purpose chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Poultry Science, 99(9), 4141–4152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.044

Mehlhorn, J., & Caspers, S. (2021). The Effects of Domestication on the Brain and Behavior of the Chicken in the Light of Evolution. Brain Behavior and Evolution, 95(6), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1159/000516787

Meyer, B., Bessei, W., Vahjen, W., Zentek, J., & Harlander-Matauschek, A. (2012). Dietary inclusion of feathers affects intestinal microbiota and microbial metabolites in growing Leghorn-type chickens. Poultry Science, 91(7), 1506–1513. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01786

Michel, V., Berk, J., Bozakova, N., van der Eijk, J., Estevez, I., Mircheva, T., Relic, R., Rodenburg, T. B., Sossidou, E. N., & Guinebretière, M. (2022). The Relationships between Damaging Behaviours and Health in Laying Hens. Animals : An Open Access Journal from MDPI, 12(8), 986. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12080986

Rørvang, M. V., Hinrichsen, L. K., & Riber, A. B. (2019). Welfare of layers housed in small furnished cages on Danish commercial farms: The condition of keel bone, feet, plumage and skin. British Poultry Science, 60(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2018.1533632

Savory, C. J. (1995). Feather pecking and cannibalism. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 51(2), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19950016

van der Eijk, J. A. J., Rodenburg, T. B., de Vries, H., Kjaer, J. B., Smidt, H., Naguib, M., Kemp, B., & Lammers, A. (2020). Early-life microbiota transplantation affects behavioural responses, serotonin and immune characteristics in chicken lines divergently selected on feather pecking. Scientific Reports, 10(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59125-w

Related topics:
#Poultry management
#Poultry genetics and reproduction
#Poultry behavior
#Poultry lighting
#Poultry welfare
Related Questions

Damaging behaviors in poultry include feather pecking, vent pecking, and toe pecking. While feather and vent pecking are well-known welfare problems in poultry that have received significant attention from researchers and farmers, toe pecking remains relatively unknown.

Toe pecking (TP) occurs when a laying hen pecks at her toes or the toes of conspecifics, often resulting in toe wounds. Therefore, TP predisposes birds to toe injury and damage. Pain and distress have been associated with injury and wounds; consequently, TP can compromise the welfare of laying hens.

Increased fearfulness, increased stress levels, increased susceptibility to infection and diseases, and impaired mobility are some of the impacts that toe pecking can have on laying hen welfare.

Genetics, diet, lighting, toe wounds, health status, stress, and socialization have been proposed as factors associated with TP in layer flocks.

Toe pecking may result in severe tissue damage and even death, leading to significant economic losses. In addition, birds receiving toe pecks may have elevated levels of fear and stress.

A holistic approach that includes genetic, environmental, and management interventions is most likely to successfully prevent and alleviate TP in layer flocks, but more research will be valuable in providing solutions to this damaging behavior.
Authors:
Marisa Erasmus
Marisa Erasmus
Purdue University (USA)
Dr. Greg Archer
Dr. Greg Archer
Egg Industry Center
Prafulla Regmi
Prafulla Regmi
University of Georgia
Shawna Weimer
Shawna Weimer
University of Arkansas (USA)
Show more
0Recommendations
0Comments
·
36Views
Recommend
Comment
Share
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Poultry Industry
Manuel Da Costa
Manuel Da Costa
Cargill
United States
Shivaram Rao
Shivaram Rao
Pilgrim´s
PhD Director Principal de Nutrición y Servicios Técnicos de Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation
United States
Thu Dinh
Thu Dinh
Tyson
Tyson
United States
Show more
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.