Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

Impact of the Lighting and Feeding Regimen During Rearing on Hy-Line Brown Pullet Growth and Start of Lay

Published: March 13, 2024
By: W.I. MUIR 1, Y. AKTER 1, K. BRUERTON 2 and P.J. GROVES 3 / 1 School of Life and Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Poultry Research Foundation, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia; 2 PO Box 1362, Elanora, Queensland, 4221, Australia; 3 Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, Poultry Research Foundation, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.
Summary

The impact of two lighting and three feeding programs during rearing on pullet body weight (BW), feed intake (FI), organ characteristics and start of lay was evaluated. Nine hundred Hyline Brown chicks were housed in floorpens from day old to 16 weeks of age (WOA) under two lighting programs i.e. standard lighting (SL) of 10h Light (L)/day from 7 WOA or, rapid light reduction (RLR) of 9h L/day from 4 WOA. Feed was provided ad libitum until 4 WOA, then three feeding regimens i.e. ad libitum, feeding to Hy-Line Brown breed standard weight (BSW), and feeding to 88% BSW(Managed) for age were introduced into each lighting program and continued to 16 WOA. Hen BW and FI were measured from 4-16 WOA. At 16 WOA a subset of pullets were sampled for carcass and reproductive tract assessment. Remaining pullets were then housed individually in a caged layer facility, with ad lib feeding under increasing photoperiod. Hen FI, BW, age of first egg and average weight of the first 3 eggs was recorded. From 4-16 WOA BW differed due to an interaction of feeding and lighting with ad lib fed birds being the heaviest and Managed feeding birds lightest. Ad lib FI was higher in SL compared to RLR. In the layer shed birds from Managed feeding during rearing had higher FI during 16-17 WOA, but ad lib fed hens sustained highest BW and, Managed feeding lowest BW through to 19 WOA. Feeding ad lib and to BSW during rearing generated higher breast muscle scores and keel curvature. Ovary and oviduct development were most advanced at 16 WOA with ad lib feeding during rearing. Pullets fed ad lib under RLR started to lay eggs first and, Managed feeding under SL were the last to start laying. The average weight of first three eggs was highest in both SL and, with feeding to BSW. Hence lighting and feeding programs during rearing altered FI, BW and age at point of lay in current day brown pullets. The hens will be followed through to 100 WOA to determine the effects of lighting and feeding during rearing on egg production, egg quality and hen health.

I. INTRODUCTION

A hen’s physiological patterns including FI and BW trajectory are established by early lay (Muir et al. 2022). Therefore, management tools such as lighting and feeding programs during rearing may offer opportunities to regulate bird size and establish feeding habits by the end of rearing. This may also influence persistency of lay, egg quality and hen health during an extended laying period. The lighting program during rearing can modify bird age at sexual maturity, the number of eggs produced and egg size (Santiago-Anadón and Latorre-Acevedo, 2004). For example, compared to a standard lighting (SL) program, more rapid light reduction (RLR) provides fewer hours of light/day, which slows chick growth and, on light stimulation, initiates earlier sexual maturity (Arango et al., 2007). Hens reared under RLR also produced more eggs of larger size at 66 WOA. While bone mineralization did not differ (Hester et al. 2011), other features of egg quality and bird health were not reported but are worthy of evaluation.
Comparison of feeding programs during rearing undertaken during the early stages of intensification of egg production show that managing feeding can impact number of smaller eggs produced during early lay, the rate of decline in egg production from peak lay and bird mortality (Lee et al. 1971; Balnave, 1973). Such features have not been evaluated in current day Brown egg laying hens. As the industry explores extending layer hen production cycles these management options require re-evaluation in today’s layer hens. This experiment compared Hy-Line Brown pullets that had been reared under two lighting and three feeding programs at point of lay.

II. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine hundred, Hy-line Brown day-old chicks, were placed in groups of 30 in floorpens (7 m2) at the Zootechny research facility, Austral, NSW, Australia. All chicks were beak trimmed and vaccinated for Newcastle Disease, Infectious Bronchitis and Marek’s Disease Virus. Each pen had a perch, automatic nipple drinkers and manually filled feed hoppers. The shed was brooded with space heaters, and had side curtains, foggers, and dimmable lights with photoperiod control for each end of the shed. A light proof curtain traversed the centre of the shed separating the two lighting treatments, with 15 pens per side. All birds were held under intermittent lighting during the first week (4hLight(L):2hDark(D)) then 20hL:4hD in the second week. For RLR the photoperiod was reduced as 16hL:8hD, then 12hL:12hD and finally held at 9hL/day from 4-16 WOA. Under SL program 20hL:4hD was maintained through to 3 WOA then reduced gradually to reach 10hL:14hD by 7 WOA, which was maintained through to 16 WOA. The study was a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement of 2 lighting and 3 feeding programs. All birds were fed ad libitum until 4 WOA when three feeding programs of five pens per lighting treatment were introduced. The three feeding regimes were: ad libitum feeding; feeding to achieve breed standard weight (BSW); and feeding to achieve 88% breed standard weight (Managed) for age (Lee et al. 1971). . All birds receive the same commercial crumble pullet starter (0-5 WOA) and grower (5-12 WOA) (Barastoc, Australia), then a Developer mash (12- 16 WOA). From 16-17.4 WOA all pullets received a Pre-lay mash and then an Early lay mash both being fed ad libitum. All birds were weighed individually from 4-16 WOA. Based on their BW the amount of feed/pen/day for each BSW and Managed feeding pen was weighed out for the following week. At 16 WOA, 15 pullets from each treatment were euthanased to evaluate breast muscle, keel curvature, keel length, abdominal fat, liver weight and ovary development, ovum width, oviduct appearance and length.
Seventy hens/treatment group were then moved to individual pens in the high-rise layer shed and held under a common lighting program with gradual increase in photoperiod as per Hy-Line Brown program. The age of first egg and weight of the first three eggs was recorded. Experimental data were analysed using a factorial ANOVA with lighting and feeding programs as the main effects.

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

At 16 WOA BW was highest in ad lib feeding under SL and lowest in Managed feeding under both SL and RLR (Table 1). Of the ad lib fed birds, SL allowed for the highest FI and RLR the lowest. Not surprisingly when all birds were on ad lib feeding in the layer shed, those that had been on Managed feeding during rearing had the highest FI between 16-17 WOA. Weekly FI varied between rearing treatment groups through to 19 WOA (Table 1). Despite this, at 19 WOA hen BW remained heaviest in ad lib feeding and lightest in birds of Managed feeding during rearing. Age of first egg was altered by both lighting and feeding (Table 1) with pullets fed ad lib under RLR being the youngest at age of first egg (19.16 WOA) and Managed feeding under SL the oldest (20.33 WOA). The lighter BW together with the later age of first egg in Managed birds concurs with the minimum BW for sexual maturity identified by Brody et al., (1984). Both SL and feeding to BSW during rearing independently generated the heaviest first three eggs.
Table 1 - Body weight, feed intake, age and weight of first eggs in Hy-Line Brown pullets reared under different lighting and feeding regimens.
Table 1 - Body weight, feed intake, age and weight of first eggs in Hy-Line Brown pullets reared under different lighting and feeding regimens.
At 16 WOA, breast muscle score, fat pad weight and keel curvature were highest in birds fed ad lib and lowest in birds receiving Managed feeding (Table 2). Heavier birds may be less able to control their flying and landing, colliding more often with the perch, feeder or pen mates (Wilkins et al 2011), resulting in damage to the keel, but this remains to be confirmed. Proportional to bird weight the Managed feeding birds had a higher percent liver weight. Features of the reproductive tract including ovary score, ovum width, oviduct appearance and oviduct length were highest in ad lib fed birds (Table 2), which concurs with their younger age at first egg and lighter weight of first three eggs (Table 1). Hence lower weight gain through controlled feeding delayed the development of sexual organs, postponing the onset of lay, also found by Bruggeman et al. (1999), with the production of heavier eggs at the start of lay. These observations are not dissimilar to those of Lee at al. (1971) and Balnave (1973) in earlier strains of egg laying hens.
These findings indicate that the management of FI and lighting during rearing can alter pullet BW, the onset of lay and the weight of the first eggs in current day egg laying hens. The effects of these rearing conditions on persistency of lay, egg quality and hen health through an extended laying cycle will be determined with the flock being followed through until hens are 100 WOA.
Table 2 - Organ characteristic of 16 week old Hy-line Brown pullets reared under different lighting and feeding regimens.
Table 2 - Organ characteristic of 16 week old Hy-line Brown pullets reared under different lighting and feeding regimens.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT: We thank Australian Eggs for funding this project.
     
Presented at the 34th Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium 2023. For information on the next edition, click here.

Arango J, Setter P, Saxena, S, Arthur J & O’Sullivan N (2007) http://internationalpoultryexposition.com/ipsf/docs/evalForm.pdf

Balnave D (1973) World’s Poultry Science Journal 29: 354-362.

Brody TB, Siegel PB & Cherry JA (1984) British Poultry Science 25: 245-252.

Bruggeman V, Onagbesan O, D’Hondt E, Buys N, Safi M, Vanmontfort D, Berghman L, Vandesande F & Decuypere E (1999) Poultry Science 78: 1424-1434.

Hester PY, Wilson, DA, Settar, P, Arango JA & O’Sullivan NP (2011) Poultry Science 90: 1645-1651.

Lee PJW, Gulliver AL & Morris TR (1971) British Poultry Science 12: 413-437.

Muir WI, Akter Y, Bruerton K & Groves PJ (2022) Poultry Science 110: 102041.

Santiago-Anadón HL & Latorre-Acevedo JR (2004) The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico 88: 135-144.

Wilkins LJ, McKinstry JL, Avery NC, Knowles TG, Brown SN, Tarlton J, Nicol CJ (2011) Veterinary Record 169: 414.

Content from the event:
Related topics:
Related Questions

A hen’s physiological patterns including FI and BW trajectory are established by early lay (Muir et al. 2022). Therefore, management tools such as lighting and feeding programs during rearing may offer opportunities to regulate bird size and establish feeding habits by the end of rearing. This may also influence persistency of lay, egg quality and hen health during an extended laying period. The lighting program during rearing can modify bird age at sexual maturity, the number of eggs produced and egg size (Santiago-Anadón and Latorre-Acevedo, 2004).

Comparison of feeding programs during rearing undertaken during the early stages of intensification of egg production show that managing feeding can impact the number of smaller eggs produced during early lay, the rate of decline in egg production from peak lay and bird mortality (Lee et al. 1971; Balnave, 1973). Such features have not been evaluated in current day Brown egg laying hens. As the industry explores extending layer hen production cycles these management options require re-evaluation in today’s layer hens. This experiment compared Hy-Line Brown pullets that had been reared under two lighting and three feeding programs at point of lay.
Authors:
Wendy Muir
The University of Sydney
The University of Sydney
Yeasmin Akter
The University of Sydney
The University of Sydney
Kenneth Bruerton
Protea Park Nutrition Services
Peter Groves
The University of Sydney
The University of Sydney
Show more
Recommend
Comment
Share
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Poultry Industry
Vivek Kuttappan
Vivek Kuttappan
Cargill
Research Scientist
United States
Kendra Waldbusser
Kendra Waldbusser
Pilgrim´s
United States
Phillip Smith
Phillip Smith
Tyson
Tyson
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.