Fusarium Mycotoxin Deoxynivalenol on the Health and Performance of Broiler Chickens

¹Department of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany

²Clinic for Avian, Reptile and Fish Medicine, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine, A-1210 Vienna, Austria

³Division of Physiology and Toxicology, Institute of Experimental Biology, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland

⁴Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, Institute of Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine, A-1210 Vienna, Austria

Int J Mol Sci. 2011; 12(11): 7996–8012. Published online 2011 November 16. doi: 10.3390/ijms12117996

Abstract

The aim of the present experiment was to investigate the effects of feeding grains naturally contaminated with Fusarium mycotoxins on morphometric indices of jejunum and to follow the passage of deoxynivalenol (DON) through subsequent segments of the digestive tract of broilers. A total of 45 1-d-old broiler chickens (Ross 308 males) were randomly allotted to three dietary treatments (15 birds/treatment): (1) control diet; (2) diet contaminated with 1 mg DON/kg feed; (3) diet contaminated with 5 mg DON/kg feed for five weeks. None of the zootechnical traits (body weight, body weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion) responded to increased DON levels in the diet. However, DON at both dietary levels (1 mg and 5 mg DON/kg feed) significantly altered the small intestinal morphology. In the jejunum, the villi were significantly (P < 0.01) shorter in both DON treated groups compared with the controls. Furthermore, the dietary inclusion of DON decreased (P < 0.05) the villus surface area in both DON treated groups. The absolute or relative organ weights (liver, heart, proventriculus, gizzard, small intestine, spleen, pancreas, colon, cecum, bursa of Fabricius and thymus) were not altered (P > 0.05) in broilers fed the diet containing DON compared with controls. DON and de-epoxy-DON (DOM-1) were analyzed in serum, bile, liver, feces and digesta from consecutive segments of the digestive tract (gizzard, cecum, and rectum). Concentrations of DON and its metabolite DOM-1 in serum, bile, and liver were lower than the detection limits of the applied liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Only about 10 to 12% and 6% of the ingested DON was recovered in gizzard and feces, irrespective of the dietary DON-concentration. However, the DON recovery in the cecum as percentage of DON-intake varied between 18 to 22% and was not influenced by dietary DON-concentration. Interestingly, in the present trial, DOM-1 did not appear in the large intestine and in feces. The results indicate that deepoxydation in the present study hardly occurred in the distal segments of the digestive tract, assuming that the complete de-epoxydation occurs in the proximal small intestine where the majority of the parent toxin is absorbed. In conclusion, diets with DON contamination below levels that induce a negative impact on performance could alter small intestinal morphology in broilers. Additionally, the results confirm that the majority of the ingested DON quickly disappears through the gastrointestinal tract.

Keywords: broiler, Fusarium mycotoxin, deoxynivalenol, small intestine, morphology, metabolism

1. Introduction

The mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON), the most prevalent trichothecene mycotoxin contaminating crops in Europe and North America [1], is commonly detected in cereals and grains. DON is a public health concern, as it is resistant to milling, processing and heating and readily enters the food chain. The digestive tract is a target for DON. The gastrointestinal mucosa serves as a dynamic barrier regulating uptake of nutrients and water, while excluding potential pathogens and toxicants [2]. Following ingestion of contaminated food or feed, intestinal epithelial cells could be exposed to a high concentration of toxicants, potentially affecting intestinal functions [3].

All animal species tested have been shown to be susceptible to DON. However, the degree of susceptibility varies according to the following order: pigs > mice > rats > poultry ≈ ruminants [4]. The difference in sensitivity may be explained by differences in absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of DON [5]. In general, poultry are less sensitive to DON compared to other species [6,7]. Negative effects on the performance of broilers occurred in dietary concentrations greater than 5 ppm, but in some investigations [8,9] even higher concentrations did not consistently induce clinical signs. One important aspect of DON toxicity is an injury of the gastrointestinal tract.

Although it is a food and feed contaminant, only scarce reports exist on the gastrointestinal effects of DON [10–14]. Critical gaps still exist regarding the potential effects of DON, and widespread animal exposure needs additional research to improve capacity for assessing adverse effects of DON. Understanding the effects of DON on the gastrointestinal tract is of major importance for protecting animal health and risk assessment.

Prelusky et al. [4] reported some changes in pigs fed a diet containing low levels of DON, including alterations in stomach and serum proteins, and suggesting specific effects of Fusarium toxins and particularly DON. The injury of the gastrointestinal tract, involving thickening of the mucosa of the stomach and a higher degree of folding, is one important characteristic of DON toxicity [15]. In addition, Awad et al. [12] found that feeding of broilers with DON artificially contaminated diets at 10 mg/kg altered the small intestinal morphology in the duodenum and jejunum.

The 12,13-epoxid group of the DON molecule is responsible for its toxicity [16]. Several microorganisms from the rumen and intestine have been shown to be capable of cleaving this group, and the resulting compound DOM-1 can be regarded as the detoxified metabolite of DON [17]. Deoxynivalenol has been completely transformed to de-epoxy DON after incubating DON with the contents from large intestine of hens [18]. However, only little is known about the metabolism of DON through the digestive tract of broilers.

Therefore, the aims of the present study were to investigate the effect of feeding a naturally DON contaminated diet at different levels (1 mg and 5 mg of DON/kg) on performance, organ weights, intestinal morphology and to follow the passage of DON through subsequent segments of the digestive tract with special consideration for the occurrence of de-epoxy-DON.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Birds, Housing and Diets

A total of 45 broiler 1-d-old chickens (Ross 308 males) was obtained from a commercial hatchery (Cobb Germany, Avimex GmbH) and randomly allotted to 3 dietary treatments (15 chicks/treatment) with each treatment having 5 replicates. The birds were housed in temperature-controlled batteries for the 35-day experimental period. The temperature was kept at 33 °C (from day 0 to day 3) and was gradually reduced (2–3 °C/week) until 23 °C was reached. A lighting program was applied as follow: 24 h for the first three days, 23 h for the next four days, and 18 h constant light schedule until the end of the experiment.

The basal diet was formulated based on wheat (50%), soybean meal (31.3%), maize (7.61%), soy oil (6.60%), and a premix with vitamins (1.20%), minerals, amino acids, and monocalcium phosphate (3.29%). Nutrient concentrations were formulated to meet or exceed minimum requirements for broilers according to the National Research Council [19] and Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie [20]. The control diet was prepared with non-contaminated wheat. The mycotoxin contaminated diet was prepared by replacing "uncontaminated" control wheat with DON contaminated wheat. The contaminated two diets contained 1 and 5 mg DON/kg compound feed. Presence of Fusarium toxins in wheat did not influence its feeding value. Chicks were fed the starter diets from d 1 to 14 and the grower diets from d 15 to 35. The average initial live weight was similar for all groups and amounted to 41.9 ± 0.46 g. Feed and water were provided ad libitum. Representative feed samples for each group (2 × 250 g) were analyzed for the content of dry matter, crude protein, crude ash and crude fiber [21] (Table 1). Deoxynivalenol and other trichothecenes (3-acetyl-deoxynivalenol, zearalanone, T-2 and HT-2 toxin were determined in the diets by the LC-MS/MS method of Blajet-Kosicka et al. [22]. During this analysis, a low contamination with Fusarium mycotoxins was also detected in control diet.

Table 1. Proximate and mycotoxin analysis of experimental diets ¹

The Impact of the Fusarium Mycotoxin Deoxynivalenol on the Health and Performance of Broiler Chickens - Image 1

¹Proximate analysis on DM basis for nutrient content according to Naumann and Bassler (2004);
²DON = deoxynivalenol;
³Mycotoxin analysis by the LC-MS/MS method according to Blajet-Kosicka et al. (2008) and the limit of detection for deoxynivalenol, 3-Acetyl-deoxynivalenol, T-2 toxin, HT-2 toxin and zearalenone: 7.0, 5.0, 0.5, 1.7, and 0.1 ng/g, respectively.

2.2. Traits
2.2.1. Performance and Morphometric Indices of the Jejunum
Body weight (BW) and feed intake measurements were determined at weekly intervals. Body weight gain (BWG) was calculated as the difference between the final and initial bird weight during each of the weighing periods. Feed intake was calculated as the difference between the amount of feed supplied to the birds and the amount of feed that remained at the end of each feeding period. Feed conversion (feed: gain ratio) was calculated as the ratio between feed intake and BW gain for each period.
At the end of experiment, following weighing, birds were killed by cervical dislocation. Proventriculus, gizzard, heart, liver, pancreas, spleen, cecum, bursa of Fabricius, thymus, and colon were excised and weighed. The gastrointestinal tract was weighed after removal of the content by gentle squeezing.
The weight and length of the intestine were measured. For the small intestine, the cut was done from the start of the duodenal loop to the ileo-cecal junction. Density of the intestines was calculated as the ratio between the weight and the length of the intestine. The intestine density is considered as an indicator of the intestinal villi size of the mucosa layer [23].
At the end of the feeding trial, on d 35, tissue samples for histology were taken from jejunum close to the junction of Meckel's diverticulum. The samples were fixed in 4% buffered formalin for 48 h. The processing consisted of serial dehydration, clearing and impregnation with wax. Tissue sections, 5 μm thick (three cross-sections from each bird), were cut by a microtome and were fixed on slides. A routine staining procedure was carried out using hematoxylin and eosin [24]. The slides were examined on an Olympus BX41 microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) fitted with a digital video camera (Olympus U-CMAD 3).

The images were analyzed using analySIS image software (Version 5) from color View soft Imaging System GmbH (Hamburg, Germany). The total of the intact well-oriented, crypt-villus units were selected in triplicate for each intestinal cross-section for each sample. The criterion for villus selection was based on the presence of an intact lamina propria. Villus height (VH) was measured from the tip of the villus to the villus-crypt junction, while crypt depth was defined as the depth of the invagination between adjacent villi. The villus width (VW) was measured at the middle of villus (the desistance between the two sides of the villus). The muscularis thickness was measured from the submucosa to the external layer of the intestine, and the villus-to-crypt ratio [25]. Apparent villus surface area (AVSA) was automatically calculated.
2.2.2. DON and Its Metabolites Detection by LC-MS/MS
For liquid samples preparation, 1.0 mL serum or bile, 1.0 mL phosphate buffer pH 6.8, containing 2000 U β-glucuronidase per 1 milliliter of a sample, was added. For liver, feces, gizzard, cecum and rectum, 5.0 g of a sample was mixed with 8.0 mL phosphate buffer pH 6.8, containing 2000 U β-glucuronidase per 1.0 g sample. Thereafter, the samples were mixed and incubated overnight at room temperature. After incubation, the extraction of the samples were done by addition of 8.0 mL of acetonitrile for liquid samples and 32.0 mL of acetonitrile for digesta and liver, the whole mixture was stirred for 30 min and filtrated.
For samples cleaning-up, the extract (4.0 mL) was mixed with 0.040 mL zearalenone (40.0 ng) and passed through a Bond Elut® Mycotoxin column (Varian, Harbor City, CA, USA). After clean-up 2.0 mL (2.5 mL serum and bile) of eluate were collected, mixed with 0.050 mL U-[13C15]-deoxynivalenol (127.0 ng) and evaporated to dryness at 40 °C under stream of nitrogen. Dry extract was reconstituted in 0.495 mL methanol: water (2:8 v/v) and analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS.

LC-MS/MS system consisted of 3200 QTRAP system from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA, USA) and a 1200 Series LC system from Agilent Technologies (Waldbronn, Germany). Chromatographic separations of mycotoxins were performed on a Phenomenex Gemini C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm). A gradient program was used with the mobile phase, combining solvent A (1% acetic acid in methanol, containing 5 mM ammonium acetate) and solvent B (1% acetic acid in water, containing 5 mM ammonium acetate) as follows: 30% A (initial), 30–90% A (5.5 min), isocratic period of 6 min at 90% A and column re-equilibration at 30% A (6.4 min). The flow rate was 0.7 mL/min while the injection volume was 20 μL. Chromatograms were integrated with the help of the Analyst 1.4.2 software. The detection limits for deoxynivalenol, 3-acetyl-deoxynivalenol, de-epoxy-DON (DOM-1), T-2, HT-2 toxin and zearalenone, were 7.0, 5.0, 7.0, 0.5, 1.7, and 0.1 ng/g, respectively. Concentrations of DON and DOM-1 in digesta and feces which were lower than the above indicated detection limits were considered with a concentration of zero in evaluating the data which implies that calculated mean values might be lower than the detection limits
2.3. Statistics

For analysis of the data, SPSS for Windows, Version 17.0 was used. A one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to examine the normal distribution of data. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the General Linear Model procedure was used for the differences in performance, intestinal histology and DON distribution by using one-way ANOVA and, subsequently, Duncan's multiple range test. The pen with the group of 3 broilers was the experimental unit for performance data. The nature of the response exhibited by different parameters was determined by employing a polynomial contrast between mycotoxin-contaminated diet and control diet by using the regression analysis. Statements of statistical significance were based on P ≤ 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

The contamination of cereal grains with toxic secondary metabolites of fungi, mycotoxins, is a permanent challenge in animal nutrition as health and performance of the animals may be compromised as well as the quality of animal derived food. Among the Fusarium mycotoxins, DON, is of special importance as it is formed at the field prior to harvest and because its occurrence cannot completely be avoided due to the major impact of weather conditions. From a practical viewpoint DON is of outstanding importance among these contaminants because of its frequent occurrence at levels high enough to cause adverse effects in animals [26,27].

The current study demonstrated the effects of feeding grains naturally contaminated with the Fusarium toxin deoxynivalenol on performance, organ weights, morphometric indices of jejunum, and DON metabolism in broilers. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first study to follow the passage of DON through subsequent segments of the digestive tract, blood, bile and in the liver with special consideration of the occurrence of de-epoxy-DON.

In the present study, the level of dietary zearalenone content was not high enough to cause any adversely affects on performance of broiler chickens, based on previous studies of Bacon and Marks [28] and Swamy et al. [29]. Moreover, a toxicological synergism between deoxynivalenol and zearalenone has not been observed in broiler chickens [29]. Furthermore, DON concentrations in the control diets (<0.1 mg/kg) were too low to cause altered performance in broiler chickens [30]. Most importantly, the very potent trichothecenes T-2 and HT-2 toxins were close to the detection limit in all diets and thus not responsible for the effects observed [31]. This justifies the conclusion, that the effects observed in the present study are attributable to DON.

3.1. Birds Performance

All birds appeared clinically normal during the entire feeding trial. No mortality occurred over the course of the whole experiment. The general performance (BW; BWG and feed efficiency) of the birds are shown in Tables 2 and and3.3. The mean BW over the course of the experiment was not affected (P > 0.05) by DON contaminated diet at both levels (1 and 5 mg/kg). Additionally, the overall mean of BWG (1525 and 1562 g/bird) over the course of the whole experiment were not affected by the dietary inclusion of DON at both levels (1 and 5 mg/kg, P > 0.05) compared with the controls (1574 g/bird). The overall mean of feed intake (1836 and 1889 g/bird) were also not affected by the dietary inclusion of DON at both levels (1 and 5 mg/kg, P > 0.05) compared with the controls (1903 g/bird).

Table 2. Body weights (g/bird) of the experimental birds (n = 15) ¹.

The Impact of the Fusarium Mycotoxin Deoxynivalenol on the Health and Performance of Broiler Chickens - Image 2

¹n = number of birds;
²Values are the means of 5 pens; the pen with the group of 3 broilers was the experimental unit for performance data;
³DON = deoxynivalenol;
⁴PSEM = pooled SEM.

Table 3. Effects of dietary Fusarium mycotoxin deoxynivalenol on performance of male broilers (n = 15) ¹.

The Impact of the Fusarium Mycotoxin Deoxynivalenol on the Health and Performance of Broiler Chickens - Image 3

In fact, during the first week of the experiment, a significant decrease in feed intake in a quadratic (P = 0.012) way was observed for the chicks receiving the DON diet compared to the chicks fed the control diet. Additionally, in the second week of the experiment, a significant decrease in BW and BWG in a quadratic manner (P = 0.009, and P = 0.036, respectively) was observed for the chicks receiving the DON diet at both levels compared to the chicks fed the control diet. The results indicated that the adverse effects of DON contaminated diet on performance were mainly due to a depression in feed intake. However, this effect was especially pronounced at the beginning of the experiment. The results indicate that broilers of these groups were able to adapt to the contaminated diet over the course of the experiment. The BW and the efficiency of feed utilization over the course of the experiment were not adversely affected (P > 0.05) by DON in the diets.

The results obtained in the present study are indeed comparable with the results obtained previously after feeding DON contaminated diet of broiler chickens [11,29,32]. Dänicke et al. [9] reviewed the literature regarding the effects of DON on the performance of broilers and came to the conclusion that dietary concentrations greater than 5 ppm are necessary to cause detrimental effects. Even higher concentrations did not consistently induce detrimental effects and in fact, even growth promoting effects were observed especially at moderately high concentrations of DON. Furthermore, most experimental studies [29,32–37] with poultry show a highly variable effect of DON on performance indicating that zootechnical traits might not be a sensitive indicator of toxicity of this Fusarium toxin. However, feed refusal and reduced weight gain can be found when the dietary concentration of DON reached 16–20 ppm [38,39].

3.2. Organ Weights

The effects of feeding DON-contaminated diets at different levels (1 and 5 mg/kg) on the absolute and relative weights of the liver, heart, proventriculus, gizzard, small intestine, spleen, pancreas, colon, cecum, bursa of Fabricius and thymus at 35 days of age are shown in Tables 4 and and5.5. The absolute and relative weights of organs (liver, heart, proventriculus, gizzard, small intestine, spleen, pancreas, colon, cecum, bursa of Fabricius and thymus) remained unaltered by DON-intake (P > 0.05).

Table 4. Effects of dietary Fusarium mycotoxin deoxynivalenol on absolute organs weights of broiler chickens (g, n = 7) ¹.

The Impact of the Fusarium Mycotoxin Deoxynivalenol on the Health and Performance of Broiler Chickens - Image 4

Table 5. Effects of dietary Fusarium mycotoxin deoxynivalenol on organs weights relative to body weight of broiler chickens (%, n = 7) ¹.

The Impact of the Fusarium Mycotoxin Deoxynivalenol on the Health and Performance of Broiler Chickens - Image 5

The effects of feeding DON-contaminated grains on organ weights of broiler chickens are very contradictory. Kubena et al. [40] found that the absolute and relative weights of the liver were decreased in growing chicks fed DON contaminated grains. Furthermore, Kubena and Harvey [41] observed no changes in organ weights (liver, spleen, kidney, and bursa of Fabricius). In another study, Kubena et al. [38] reported increased weight of bursa of Fabricius. In all these studies the chickens were fed 16 mg of DON/kg from contaminated wheat for 21 days. The outcome of these studies was highly variable, indicating that organ weights might not be a relevant indicator of toxicity of some Fusarium mycotoxins. The exposure time of the toxin may be a significant factor for toxin effects on organ weights because the organ initially swells with a short-time exposure followed by shrinkage with long-time exposure [42].

Additionally, no significant (P > 0.05) difference was noticed between birds fed DON and the control for the intestine length. For the intestine density (weight/length ratio), no significant difference was noticed between all treatments (Table 6). There was a positive correlation between small intestine weight and its length (P = 0.035, r = 0.452) and a positive correlation between the small intestine length and bird body weight (P = 0.029, r = 0.467).

Table 6. Intestinal traits of broiler chickens fed diets with different levels of deoxynivalenol (n = 7) ¹.

The Impact of the Fusarium Mycotoxin Deoxynivalenol on the Health and Performance of Broiler Chickens - Image 6

3.3. Morphometric Indices

Following ingestion of contaminated feed, the intestinal epithelium can be exposed to high concentrations of DON [2]. Consequently, the digestive tract is a primary target to elicit toxic effects. In the present study, a significant reduction of VH, AVSA, and muscularis thickness in jejunum was observed after feeding contaminated grains. These histological alterations could be attributed to the irritant effects of DON on the upper gastrointestinal tract. These changes might appear as indirect response to the dietary trichothecenes. Moreover, DON inhibits protein synthesis and this causes necrosis of epithelial cells. So, the tissue most affected in the manner is the lining of the intestinal tract. This can cause bleeding into the intestinal lumen, increased frequency of ulcers and damage to the absorptive surfaces causing reduced nutrient uptake. In addition, Rocha et al. [43] reported multiple inhibitory effects for trichothecenes on eukaryotic cells including disruption of normal cell function by inhibiting RNA, DNA, and inhibition of cell divisions, stimulation of ribotoxic stress response, and activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases. The latter enzymes catalyze reactions in signal transduction related to proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [5].

In the present study, deoxynivalenol at both levels significantly altered the small intestinal morphology (Table 7, and Figure 1). In the jejunum, the villi were shorter (P < 0.01) (1200 μm and 1288 μm for 1 mg and 5 mg DON/kg diet) in DON fed birds compared with the controls (1528 μm). The dietary DON contamination also decreased (P < 0.05) the villus surface area (188 mm2 and 203 mm2 for 1 mg and 5 mg DON/kg diet) in DON fed birds compared with the controls (315 mm2). However, no dietary effect was apparent for villus width, crypt depth, and villus height/crypt depth ratio in the jejunal mucosa. Furthermore, there was no correlation between the villus height and the small intestinal weight (P = 0.102, r = 0.398).

Table 7. Effects of feeding Fusarium mycotoxin deoxynivalenol on small intestinal morphology of broiler chickens at 5 wk of age (n = 6) ¹.

The Impact of the Fusarium Mycotoxin Deoxynivalenol on the Health and Performance of Broiler Chickens - Image 7

Figure 1. Histomorphometric analysis of the jejunum of a 5-wk-old broiler chickens fed diets with or without DON with magnification 200 (n = 6): (a) the Villus height of the jejunum of the control birds; (b) birds fed with 1 mg DON/kg diet; (c) birds fed with 5 mg DON/kg diet.

The Impact of the Fusarium Mycotoxin Deoxynivalenol on the Health and Performance of Broiler Chickens - Image 8

Polynomial contrasts constructed also on morphological parameters resulted in a significant effect of diets on villus length linearly (P = 0.036) and quadratically (P = 0.006). Additionally, dietary incorporation of contaminated grains resulted in a linear (P = 0.046) and quadratic response (P = 0.040) in villus area. The increasing levels of dietary DON were found to decrease the jejunal muscularis thickness in a linear (P = 0.034) way. However, there was no response of DON contaminated diets (P > 0.05) on the other morphometrical variables.

The results obtained in the present study are indeed comparable with the results obtained previously after feeding DON contaminated diet of broiler chickens [12]. Girgis et al. [44] found that feeding of diets contaminated with Fusarium mycotoxins could alter intestinal morphology in broiler breeder. Fairchild et al. [45] reported significant reduction in relative intestinal weight and jejunal serosa thickness in turkey poults fed 300 mg of purified fusaric acid (FA)/kg of feed for 18 days. Feeding 4 mg of diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS)/kg of feed to turkey poults did not affect the weight of intestine; however, feeding both, FA and DAS, to poults decreased enterocyte height at midvillus by 59%. This decrease, however, is indicative of Fusarium mycotoxins altering digestive and absorptive function [13,45]. This is supported by Sklan et al. [46] who indicated that feeding of T-2 toxin or diacetoxyscirpenol at levels up to 1 ppm for 32 days to poults did not depress but enhanced growth, and did not influence antibody production but caused changes in small intestinal morphology, especially in the jejunum where villi were shorter and thinner.

Trichothecenes cause harmful injury to the mucosa, destroying cells on the tips of villi and radiomimetic injury to rapidly dividing crypt epithelium [47]. The morphological alterations in villus height, muscularis thickness, and AVSA may contribute to reduced nutrient absorption in jejunum as we have previously reported [11,48]. However, in the present study, no significant difference was noticed between all treatments for the intestine density (weight/length), indicating that the intestine density might not be a sensitive indicator of toxicity of this Fusarium toxin.

3.4. Deoxynivalenol Tissue Distribution

Very little is known about the metabolism and kinetics of DON when it passes through the digestive tract, which is the first step governing the entry of DON into the organism. It is known from the literature that DON is metabolized by rumen microbes and microbes from large intestine of hens to de-epoxy-DON [18,49]. In the present study, the DON concentrations after oral exposure was rapidly and nearly completely absorbed (90%) while passing through the stomach and resulted in the distinctly faster disappearance of DON from this part of the digestive tract. Moreover, absorption of DON from the stomach could have contributed to the rapid DON disappearance. Such a possibility was discussed by Awad et al. [13], who detected DON in the blood side of broilers as early as 30 min after exposure to DON. Whether the 90% absorbed DON was systemically available cannot be answered since any simultaneous measurement of DON-kinetics after oral DON exposure was undertaken and thus the contribution of a possible hepatic and renal first-pass effect to DON-elimination remains to be answered. There is scarce information available about the role of bile and biliary excretion of DON in its overall metabolism in chickens.

In the current experiment, DON and DOM-1 were analyzed in serum and digesta from consecutive segments of the digestive tract (gizzard, cecum, and rectum). The DON concentration in gizzard was about 10 to 12% of DON intake irrespective to the dietary DON-concentration. Only about 6% of the ingested DON was recovered in feces and about 18 to 22% was recovered in cecum as unchanged DON irrespective to the dietary DON-concentration. Neither DON nor DOM-1 was detected in any of the analyzed specimens (blood, liver, and bile). However, there was a positive correlation (P = 0.000) between the amount of DON recovered in the digesta and the amount of the ingested DON. DON concentration in the digesta increased (P = 0.000) in a dose dependent manner (Table 8). In the present study, samples from small intestine digesta were not taken because of the low dry matter content of <10% and, in addition, many times the small intestine was empty.

Table 8. DON ¹ concentration in the content of gizzard, cecum, rectum and feces (n = 7) ².

The Impact of the Fusarium Mycotoxin Deoxynivalenol on the Health and Performance of Broiler Chickens - Image 9

¹Concentrations of DON in gizzard, cecum, rectum and feces which were lower than the above indicated detection limits were considered with a concentration of zero in evaluating the data which implies that calculated mean values might be lower than the detection limits;
²n = number of birds;
³DON = deoxynivalenol;
⁴PSEM = pooled SEM;
^a,b,cMeans in column with a common superscript are significantly different (P < 0.001).

The results indicate an effective elimination of the toxin from the broiler's body, which is in contrast to pigs in which DON residues can be measured in blood and bile, even when the diets contained <1 mg of DON/kg of diet [50–52]. Additionally, only about 6% of the ingested DON was recovered in feces and about 20 % o was recovered in cecum as unchanged DON. The high amount of DON in the cecum could be attributed to the passage of DON is related to the dry matter content which might indicate that DON probably emptied with the liquid phase of the digesta. It might also be attributed to the urinary back reflux from cloacae and lead to a high absorption of DON. The results of the present study are in agreement with Lun et al. [53], who reported that DON seems to be rapidly and efficiently absorbed, most probably from the stomach and upper parts of the small intestine and little appears in the excreta of hens.

In the present trial, DOM-1 did not appear in the large intestine and in feces (Table 8). The results indicate that de-epoxydation in the present study hardly occurred in the distal segments of the digestive tract, assuming that the complete de-epoxydation occurs in the proximal small intestine where the majority of the parent toxin is absorbed. It seems reasonable to assume that the nearly complete de-epoxydation in the small intestine contributes highly to a detoxification of ingested DON. However, this was not investigated in the present study. This view is further substantiated by the results of He et al. [18] who reported that the intestinal microflora of chickens plays a major role in DON detoxification which might explain the relative tolerance of poultry.

In general, the recommended maximum level of DON in grains used in poultry diets is 5 mg/kg. The level of DON in the experimental diets of the current study is, therefore, of practical relevance to the field. The feeding of DON contaminated diets in the current study represents chronic exposure of broiler chickens to DON rather than an acute toxin challenge. Interestingly, no significant differences were found among the DON-supplemented groups for morphologic changes in the intestine (villus length and absorptive area), indicating that low and moderate concentrations of DON exhibit a similar toxicity. The findings reported here under experimental conditions assume practical importance because of the common occurrence of Fusarium mycotoxins in poultry feeds.

Moreover, understanding the mechanistic basis by which these toxins cause toxicity in chickens will improve our ability to predict the specific thresholds for adverse effects as well as the persistence and reversibility of these effects in the highly susceptible animals and human.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, diets with DON contamination below levels that induce a negative impact on performance could affect the animal health by alteration of small intestinal morphology in broilers. Additionally, the results confirm that the majority of the ingested DON is quickly, nearly completely, absorbed in the stomach and proximal part of the small intestine. It was concluded that de-epoxydation of DON did not occur in the hindgut, suggesting that complete de-epoxydation occurs in the proximal small intestine, contributing highly to a detoxification of ingested DON in broilers.

Acknowledgements

The assistance of the co-workers of the Institute of Animal Nutrition of Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, in Germany in performing the experiments and analyses is gratefully acknowledged.

References

1. Schothorst R.C., van Egmond H.P. Report from SCOOP task 3.210 collection of occurrence data of Fusarium toxins in food and assessment of dietary intake by the population of EU member states. Subtask/trichothecenes. Toxicol. Lett. 2004;153:133–143.

2. Oswald I.P. Role of intestinal epithelial cells in the innate immune response of the pig intestine. Vet. Res. 2006;37:359–368.

3. Bouhet S., Oswald I.P. The effects of mycotoxins, fungal food contaminants, on the intestinal epithelial cell-derived innate immune response. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2005;108:199–209.

4. Prelusky D.B., Gerdes R.G., Underhill K.L., Rotter B.A., Jui P.Y., Trenholm H.L. Effects of low level dietary deoxynivalenol on the haematological and clinical parameters of the pig. Nat. Toxins. 1994;2:97–104.

5. Pestka J.J., Smolinski A.T. Deoxynivalenol: toxicology and potential effects on humans. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part B. 2005;8:39–69.

6. Böhm J. Fusarientoxine in der Tierernährung. Übersicht. Tierern. 2000;28:95–132.

7. Razzazi-Fazeli E., Böhm J., Adler A., Zentek J. Fusarientoxine und ihre Bedeutung in der Nutztierfütterung: Eine Übersicht. Wiener Tierärztl. Monatsschr. 2003;90:202–210.

8. Leitgeb R., Lew H., Khidr R., Böhm J., Zollitsch W., Wagner E. Influence of fusariotoxins on growth and carcass characteristics of turkeys. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2000;51:171–178.

9. Dänicke S., Gareis M., Bauer J. Orientation values for critical concentrations of deoxynivalenol and zearalenone in diets for pigs, ruminants and gallinaceous poultry. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 2001;10:171–174.

10. Maresca M., Mahfoud R., Garmy N., Fantini J. The mycotoxin deoxynivalenol affects nutrient absorption in human intestinal epithelial cells. J. Nutr. 2002;132:2723–2731.

11. Awad W.A., Böhm J., Razzazi-Fazeli E., Hulan H.W., Zentek J. Effects of deoxynivalenol on general performance and electrophysiological properties of intestinal mucosa of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2004;83:1964–1972.

12. Awad W.A., Razzazi-Fazeli E., Böhm J., Ghareeb K., Zentek J. Effect of addition of a probiotic microorganism to broiler diets contaminated with deoxynivalenol on performance and histological alterations of intestinal villi of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2006;85:974–979.

13. Awad W.A., Aschenbach J.R., Setyabudi F.M.C.S., Razzazi-Fazeli E., Böhm J., Zentek J. In vitro effects of deoxynivalenol on small intestinal D-glucose uptake and absorption of deoxynivalenol across the isolated jejunal epithelium of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2007;86:15–20.

14. Kolf-Clauw M., Castellote J., Joly B., Bourges-Abella N., Raymond-Letron I., Pinton P., Oswald I.P. Development of a pig jejunal explant culture for studying the gastrointestinal toxicity of the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol: Histopathological analysis. Toxicol. In Vitro. 2009;23:1580–1584.

15. Rotter B.A., Thomposon B.K., Lessard M., Trenholm H.L., Tryphonas H. Influence of exposure to Fusarium mycotoxins on selected immunological and hematological parameters in young swine. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 1994;23:117–124.

16. Feinberg B., Mclaughlin C.S. Biochemical Mechanism of Action of Trichothecene Mycotoxins. In: Beasley V.R., editor. Trichothecene Mycotoxicosis: Pathophysiologic Effects. I. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 1989. pp. 27–35.

17. King R.R., McQueen R.E., Levesque D., Greenhalgh R. Transformation of deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) by rumen microorganisms. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1984;32:1181–1183.

18. He P., Young L.G., Forsberg C. Microbial transformation of deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) Appl. Envir. Microbiol. 1992;58:3857–3863.

19. National Research Council (NRC) Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 8th ed. National Academy Press; Washington, DC, USA: 1994.

20. Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie (Gfe) Empfehlungen zur Energie- und Nährstoffversorgung von Legehennen u. Masthühnern (Broiler) DLG Verlag; Frankfurt, Germany: 1999.

21. Naumann C., Bassler C. Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. 3rd ed. VDLUFA-Verlag; Darmstadt, Germany: 2004.

22. Blajet-Kosicka A., Kosicki R., Twaruzek M., Grajewski J. Application of liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry to mycotoxins analysis in several matrices (food- and feedstuffs, biological samples, fungi cultures) Acta Biochem. Pol. 2008;55:50.

23. Abdel-Fattah S.A., El-Sanhoury M.H., El-Mednay N.M., Abdel-Azeem F. Thyroid activity, some blood constituents, organs morphology and performance of broiler chicks fed supplemental organic acids. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2008;7:215–222.

24. Girdhar S.R., Barta J.R., Santoyo F.A., Smith T.K. Dietary putrescine (1,4-diaminobutane) influences recovery of turkey poults challenged with a mixed coccidial infection. J. Nutr. 2006;136:2319–2324.

25. Geyra A., Uni Z., Sklan D. Enterocyte dynamics and mucosal development in the posthatch chick. Poult. Sci. 2001;80:776–782.

26. Bottalico A., Perrone G. Toxigenic Fusarium species and mycotoxins associated with head blight in small-grain cereals in Europe. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 2002;108:611–624.

27. Logrieco A., Mule G., Moretti A., Bottalico A. Toxigenic Fusarium species and mycotoxins associated with maize ear rot in Europe. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 2002;108:597–609.

28. Bacon C.W., Marks H.L. Growth of broilers and quail fed Fusarium (Gibberella zeae)-infected corn and zearalenone. Poult. Sci. 1976;55:1531–1535.

29. Swamy H.V.L.N., Smith T.K., Cotter P.F., Boermans H.J., Seftons A.E. Effects of feeding blends of grains naturally contaminated with Fusarium mycotoxins on production and metabolism in broilers. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. 2002;81:966–975.

30. Hulan H.W., Proudfoot F.G. Effects of feeding vomitoxin contaminated wheat on the performance of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 1982;61:1653–1659.

31. Conková E., Laciaková A., Kovác G., Seidel H. Fusarial toxins and their role in animal diseases. Vet. J. 2003;165:214–220.

32. Li Y.D., Verstegen M.W.A., Gerrits W.J.J. The impact of low concentrations of aflatoxin, deoxynivalenol or fumonisin in diets on growing pigs and poultry. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2003;16:223–239.

33. Kubena L.F., Edrington T.S., Harvey R.B., Phillips T.D., Sarr A.B., Rottinghaus G.E. Individual and combined effects of fumonisin B1 present in Fusarium moniliforme culture material and diacetoxyscirpenol or ochratoxin A in turkey poults. Poult. Sci. 1997;76:256–264.

34. Harvey R.B., Kubena L.F., Rottinghaus G.E., Turk J.R., Casper H.H., Buckley S.A. Moniliformin from Fusarium fujikuroi culture material and deoxynivalenol from naturally contaminated wheat incorporated into diets of broiler chicks. Avian Dis. 1997;41:957–963.

35. Dänicke S., Ueberschär K.H., Halle I., Matthes S., Valenta H., Flachowsky G. Effect of addition of a detoxifying agent to laying hen diets containing uncontaminated or Fusarium toxin-contaminated maize on performance of hens and on carryover of zearalenone. Poult. Sci. 2002;81:1671–1680.

36. Dänicke S., Matthes S., Halle I., Ueberschär K.H., Doll S., Valenta H. Effects of graded levels of Fusarium toxin-contaminated wheat and of a detoxifying agent in broiler diets on performance, nutrient digestibility and blood chemical parameters. Br. Poult. Sci. 2003;44:113–126.

37. Sypecka Z., Kelly M., Brereton P.P. Deoxynivalenol and zearalenone residues in eggs of laying hens fed with a naturally contaminated diet: Effects on egg production and estimation of transmission rates from feed to eggs. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004;52:5463–5471.

38. Kubena L.F., Huff W.E., Harvey R.B., Phillips T.D., Rottinghaus G.E. Individual and combined toxicity of deoxynivalenol and T-2 toxin in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 1989;68:622–626.

39. Harvey R.B., Kubena L.F., Huff W.E., Elissalde M.H., Phillips T.D. Heamatological and immunological toxicity of deoxynivalenol contaminated diets to growing chickens. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1991;40:410–416.

40. Kubena L.F., Swanson S.P., Harvey R.B., Fletcher O.J., Rowe L.D., Phillips T.D. Effects of feeding deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin)-contaminated wheat to growing chicks. Poult. Sci. 1985;64:1649–1655.

41. Kubena L.F., Harvey R.B. Response of growing Leghorn chicks to deoxynivalenol-contaminated wheat. Poult. Sci. 1988;67:1778–1780.

42. Swamy H.V.L.N., Smith T.K., Karrow N.A., Boermans H.J. Effects of feeding blends of grains naturally contaminated with Fusarium mycotoxins on growth and immunological parameters of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2004;83:533–543.

43. Rocha O., Ansari K., Doohan F.M. Effects of trichothecene mycotoxins on eukaryotic cells: A review. Food Addit. Contam. 2005;22:369–378.

44. Girgis G.N., Barta J.R., Brash M., Smith T.K. Morphologic changes in the intestine of broiler breeder pullets fed diets naturally contaminated with Fusarium mycotoxins with or without coccidial challenge. Avian Dis. 2010;54:67–73.

45. Fairchild A.S., Grimes J.L., Porter J.K., Croom W.J., Jr, Daniel L.R., Hagler W.M., Jr Effects of diacetoxyscirpenol and fusaric acid on poults: Individual and combined effects of dietary diacetoxyscirpenol and fusaric acid on turkey poult performance. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2005;4:350–355.

46. Sklan D., Shelly M., Makovsky B., Geyra A., Klipper K., Friedman A. The effect of chronic feeding diacetoxyscirpenol and T-2 toxin on performance, health, small intestinal physiology and antibody production in turkey poults. Br. Poult. Sci. 2003;44:46–52.

47. Hoerr F.J. Pathogenesis of enteric diseases. Poult. Sci. 1998;77:1150–1155.

48. Awad W.A., Rehman H., Böhm J., Razzazi-Fazeli E., Zentek J. Effects of luminal deoxynivalenol and L-proline on electrophysiological parameters in the jejunums of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2005;84:928–932.

49. Eriksen G.S., Pettersson H., Johnsen K., Lindberg J.E. Transformation of trichothecenes in ileal digesta and faeces from pigs. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2002;56:263–274.

50. Döll S., Dänicke S., Ueberschär K.H., Valenta H., Schnurrbusch U., Ganter M., Klobasa F., Flachowsky G. Effects of graded levels of Fusarium toxin contaminated maize in diets for female weaned piglets. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2003;57:311–334.

51. Dänicke S., Valenta H., Goyarts T., Razzazi E., Böhm J. On the effects of increasing deoxynivalenol (DON) concentrations in pig feed on growth performance and utilization of nutrients and on DON metabolism. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2004;13:539–556.

52. Dänicke S., Brüssow K., Valenta H., Ueberschär K.H., Tiemann U., Schollenberger M. On the effects of graded levels of Fusarium toxin contaminated wheat in diets for gilts on feed intake, growth performance and metabolism of deoxynivalenol and zearalenone. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2005;49:932–943.

53. Lun A.K., Moran E.T., Young L.G., McMillan E.G. Disappearance of deoxynivalenol from digesta progressing along the chicken's gastrointestinal tract after intubation with feed containing contaminated corn. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1988;40:317–324.