Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

A Novel Phytase Enhances Growth Performance in Broiler Chickens Offered Reduced Crude Protein Diets

Published: June 9, 2023
By: S.Y. LIU 1; P.V. CHRYSTAL 1,2; S.P. MACELLINE 1; C.W. MAYNARD 3; Y. DERSJANT-LI 4; A. E. GHANE 5 and P.H. SELLE 1 / 1 Poultry Research Foundation, Camden NSW; 2 Baiada Poultry Pty Limited, Pendle Hill, NSW; 3 University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, USA; 4 DuPont Animal Nutrition, The Netherlands; 5 DuPont Industrial Biosciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Summary

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a novel consensus bacterial 6-phytase variant (PhyG) dosed at 1500 FTU/kg on growth performance in broiler chickens offered diets with three different crude protein (CP) concentrations (Low, Medium and High). The maizesoy experimental diets were offered to 720 off-sex male Ross 308 broiler chickens from 1-10 (starter), 11-28 (grower) and 29-41 (finisher) days post-hatch. Each of the six treatments was offered to eight replicates with 15 birds per replicate. No interaction was found between phytase and dietary CP. Phytase significantly enhanced feed intake and weight gain during the starter phase (P < 0.001). During the grower phase, phytase significantly enhanced weight gain (P = 0.001) and reduced FCR (P = 0.023). Cumulatively, reducing dietary CP from High to Medium did not compromise weight gain but increased weigh-corrected FCR (P < 0.001); whereas phytase significantly enhanced weight gain (P < 0.001) and improved weightcorrected FCR of broiler chickens (P < 0.001) from 0-41 days post-hatch. The present study confirmed the benefit of supplementing exogenous phytase in diets containing reduced CP content where soybean meal was partially substituted by crystalline or synthetic amino acids.

I INTRODUCTION
Phytate is ubiquitous in plant-based feed ingredients and phytase is routinely supplemented in poultry diets. Moreover, there is considerable interest within the chicken-meat industry in increasing dietary inclusion rates of crystalline or synthetic amino acids to develop reduced protein diets. An increasing array of both essential and nonessential non-bound amino acids is becoming commercially available at inclusion costs that are becoming increasingly feasible. Reduced CP diets reduces the industry’s dependency on imported soybean meals and was reported to have less nitrogen excretion (Nahm, 2007), enhance litter quality and reduce the incidence of footpad lesions. It is straightforward that non-bound amino acids partially replace soybean meal in reduced CP diets which leads to the lower concentration of phytate in the diets. Therefore, the intention of the present study is to evaluation the efficacy of a novel consensus bacterial 6-phytase variant in broiler diets containing conventional and reduced CP levels.
II MATERIALS AND METHODS
The feeding study complied with specific guidelines approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of The University of Sydney. A novel consensus bacterial 6-phytase variant (PhyG, Axtra® PHY GOLD, DuPont Animal Nutrition) was supplemented at 1500 FTU/kg to diets with three different CP concentrations (235, 215, 195 g/kg for starter; 215, 195, 175 g/kg for grower; 195, 175, 155 g/kg for finisher). For each phase, the six experimental diets were formulated to be iso-energetic and contained the same dietary levels of digestible lysine (12.8 g/kg for starter, 11.5 g/kg for grower and 10.2 g/kg for finisher), total sulphur amino acids (TSAA), threonine, and valine within each phase. The phytase supplemented diets were formulated with reduction of avP (1.95 g/kg), Ca (2.1 g/kg) and Na (0.45 g/kg). Starter, grower, and finisher diets were fed from 0 to 10 days, 11 to 28 days, and 29 to 41 days, respectively. The average analysed phytase activities in the control and supplemented diets were 200 and 1926 FTU/kg, respectively. All diets contained similar ideal protein ratios and were cold-pelleted. Starter diets were offered as crumble, whereas subsequent diets were in pellet form. Each of the six dietary treatments was offered to 8 replicate floor pens (15 birds per pen) or a total of 720 off-sex male Ross 308 chicks (parent line). Chickens had ad libitum access to feed and water. Initial and final body weights were determined, and feed intakes were recorded from which feed conversion ratios (FCR) were calculated. The incidence of dead or culled birds was recorded daily and their body-weights used to adjust FCR calculations. ANOVA and linear and quadratic correlation were performed using JMP® 13.0.0 and significance was determined at P < 0.05 by Student t-test.
Table 1 - Dietary compositions and calculated nutrient specifications in control diets
Table 1 - Dietary compositions and calculated nutrient specifications in control diets
Table 2 - Growth performance in broiler chickens from 0-10, 0-28 and 0-41 days post-hatch
Table 2 - Growth performance in broiler chickens from 0-10, 0-28 and 0-41 days post-hatch
III RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
There was no interaction between phytase and dietary CP on growth performance (P > 0.05). Predictably, reducing dietary CP depressed FCR for all the three growing phases (P < 0.05) and moderate dietary CP reduction did not influence weight gain from 0-10 and 0-41 days posthatch (P > 0.05). Collectively, phytase supplementation improved weight gain and feed conversion regardless of the dietary CP levels. For instance, from 0-41 days, phytase supplementations improved weight corrected FCR by 0.56%, 3.68% and 2.14% in diets containing High, Medium and Low CP, respectively. It also increased weight gain by 0.98%, 3.07% and 2.47% in High, Medium and Low CP diets, respectively. It is encouraging phytase had more pronounced impact on growth performance in reduced CP diets compared to conventional diets, this may be attributed to increasing phytate to intact protein ratios (Table 3). Consistently, Liu and Selle (2017) reported increasing dietary phytate-P concentration from 2.6 g/kg to 3.0 g/kg in a diet containing higher concentration of crystalline amino acids reduced weight gain by 16% (1628 versus 1374 g/bird respectively), in comparison with a 5% reduction in weight gain when the same levels of phytate-P were added to a conventional diet; similar impact were observed on FCR where increasing phytate-P in high non-bound amino acid diet compromised FCR by 22% (1.130 versus 1.374 g/g respectively), but did not influence FCR in conventional diets. Phytate may influence protein digestion and utilization by forming binary or ternary phytate-protein complexes depending on the isoelectric points of the ingredients and environment (Selle et al., 2012). In the present study, the High, Medium and Low CP diets were estimated to contain 39.2, 42.8 and 47.7 g phytate relative to 1 kg of intact protein, respectively. Another possibility is phytate may have larger negative impact on amino acid and glucose absorption in reduced CP diets. Eighty per cent of dietary glucose is actively absorbed by Na+-dependent transport systems and phytate has been shown to decrease sodium-pump activity and glucose absorption in rats (Dilworth et al., 2005). The present study focused on growth performance only and further research is required to understand the impact of phytate on nutrient absorption and the benefit of phytase on nutrient utilizations in reduced CP diets.
Table 3 - Estimated phytate: intact protein ratios in grower diets
Table 3 - Estimated phytate: intact protein ratios in grower diets
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The authors would like to thank DuPont Animal Nutrition for funding this research project. We also acknowledge the technical assistance of Ms Joy Gill, Mr Duwei Chen, Ms Kylie Warr and Mr Peter Bird from Poultry Research Foundation for their assistance with feed manufacturing, bird management, sample collection and laboratory analyses.
      
Presented at the 32th Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium 2021. For information on the next edition, click here.

Dilworth LL, Omoruyi FO & Asemota HN (2005) Diabetologia Croatica 34: 59-65.

Liu SY & Selle PH (2017) Animal Production Science 57: 2250-2256.

Nahm KH (2007) Bioresource Technology 98: 2282-2300.

Selle PH, Cowieson AJ, Cowieson NP & Ravindran V (2012) Nutrition Research Reviews 25: 1-17.

Content from the event:
Related topics:
Authors:
Dr Sonia Yun Liu
The University of Sydney
The University of Sydney
Peter Chrystal
Baiada Poultry
Baiada Poultry
Shemil Macelline
The University of Sydney
The University of Sydney
Clay Maynard
University of Arkansas (USA)
University of Arkansas (USA)
yueming dersjant-li
IFF - International Flavors & Fragrances
Amir Ghane
IFF - International Flavors & Fragrances
Dr. Peter Selle
The University of Sydney
The University of Sydney
Show more
Recommend
Comment
Share
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Poultry Industry
Manuel Da Costa
Manuel Da Costa
Cargill
United States
Shivaram Rao
Shivaram Rao
Pilgrim´s
PhD Director Principal de Nutrición y Servicios Técnicos de Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation
United States
Karen Christensen
Karen Christensen
Tyson
Tyson
PhD, senior director of animal welfare at Tyson Foods
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.