Endogenous Enzyme Activities and Energy Utilisation of Broiler Chickens Fed Sorghum-Based Diets Supplemented with Phytase and Carbohydrases

Published on: 6/28/2021
Author/s : M.Al-Qahtani 1, K.I. Al-Qahtani 1, E.U. Ahiwe 1, H.J Gausi 1, M.E. Abdallh 1, E.P. Chang’a 1, M.M. Ari 1, M.R. Bedford 2 and P.A. Iji 1,3 / 1 School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW; 2 AB Vista, 3 Woodstock Court, Marlborough, Wilts, UK; 3 College of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Fiji National University, Koronivia, Fiji.
Summary

This study was conducted to evaluate the endogenous enzyme activities and energy utilisation of broiler chickens fed sorghum-based diets supplemented with phytase and carbohydrases. The birds were housed in cages in climate-controlled rooms. The jejunum and pancreas were collected at 10 and 24 d for analysis of endogenous digestive enzyme activities. Birds were also sampled at hatch and 24 d and analysed for gross energy, fat and crude protein contents. The data were used to calculate heat production, net energy of production and efficiency of energy utilisation. There were improvements in digestive enzyme activities and utilisation of energy, in terms of metabolisable energy and net energy of production (NEp), suggesting the suitability of the exogenous test enzymes for use in sorghum-based diets.

I. INTRODUCTION

A recent on Australian sorghum by Selle et al. (2017) that sorghum produced in Australia is used almost exclusively for feed, especially cattle, pigs and poultry. The objective of the present study is to assess the response of broiler chickens to diets based on sorghum, when supplemented with a combination of enzymes, targeting different substrates.

 

II. MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 648 male and female Ross 308 broiler chickens was randomly assigned in a 3 × 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments [3 doses of phytase none, standard (100 mg/kg) and superdose (300 mg/kg)] × 2 doses of xylanase and of β-glucanase [none and standard (100 mg/kg)] in a completely randomised design. Each of the 12 treatments was replicated 6 times, with 9 birds per replicate. The diets were fed ad libitum from 0 to 35 days in 3 phases – starter as crumble (1-10 d), grower as pellet (11-24 d) and finisher as pellet (25-35 d). The test diets contained 60, 64 and 68 % of sorghum in the starter, grower and finisher respectively and were formulated to meet the specifications recommended for the Ross 308 broiler chickens (Aviagen, 2014). A sub-sample of 10 day-old chicks was euthanised by cervical dislocation, minced and analysed to provide baseline data on body composition (gross energy, crude protein and fat contents). At d 24 two birds per pen were randomly selected, euthanised by cervical dislocation and processed (chopped, minced and freeze-dried) and used to determine carcass energy, protein and fat. On d 10 and d 24 one bird was randomly selected from each cage, electrically stunned and euthanised by cervical dislocation. These were dissected to obtain the whole pancreas and anterior jejunum (4-5 cm long) and used to determine the endogenous enzyme activities. Another 2 birds were similarly slaughtered at d 24 and processed as described for the birds collected at d 0, to determine the energy, protein and fat contents of the intact carcass. The data from d 24 were related to the baseline data obtained from the day-old chicks, to calculate the heat production (HP), NEp and efficiency of utilisation of metabolisable energy. Between d 25 and d 35 birds were fed finisher diets to measure meat parts yield. A general linear model procedure was used to analyse the collected data (Minitab Inc., 2013).

 

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

There was an interaction (P < 0.003) between phytase, xylanase and β-glucanase on chymotrypsin activity at d 10. Addition of phytase increased (P < 0.02) pancreatic protein content, trypsin activity and general proteolytic activity. At d 24 pancreatic protein content and enzyme activities (chymotrypsin, trypsin and general proteolytic activity) also responded (P < 0.02) to interactions between phytase and β-glucanase. General proteolytic activity was increased (P < 0.004) in the groups supplemented with phytase. At d 10, there was no interaction between the factors on the activities of jejunal membrane-bound enzymes but the activities of maltase, sucrase and alkaline phosphatase were increased (P < 0.004) with phytase inclusion. Phytase supplementation also increased (P < 0.01) the activities of jejunal sucrase and aminopeptidase at d 24

At d 24, there was an interaction (P < 0.03) between phytase, xylanase and β-glucanase on apparent metabolisable energy (AME) content. The interaction between xylanase and βglucanase on energy retained as fat and as protein and on efficiency of metabolisable energy use for lipid retention were significant (P < 0.01). Addition of phytase to the diets increased (P < 0.001) the NEp, AME, energy retained as fat, energy retained as protein, and the efficiency of metabolisable energy for energy, lipid and protein retention. The efficiency of utilisation of metabolisable energy for energy retention was also increased (P < 0.05) with β-glucanase supplementation.

 

IV. CONCLUSIONS

The test enzymes are suitable for use in sorghum-based diets and can be increased the enzyme activities in jejunal and pancreas. Their effects on energy use warrant this recommendation.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: We would like to thank AB Vista, UK and UNE for providing research funds.

 

 

 

 
 
Abstract presented at the 30th Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium 2019. For information on the next edition, check out http://www.apss2022.com.au/

Bibliographic references

 
Author/s
Paul Iji is an Associate Professor of Poultry Science at the University of New England (UNE), Armidale, Australia. Dr Iji studied in Nigeria, Scotland and Australia, and prior to his appointment at UNE, worked in similar positions in Nigeria and South Africa. His main area of research is poultry nutrition, with specialization in gastrointestinal physiology. His current research is on alternative feed ingredients for poultry; their nutritive value, and ways to improve them. He has supervised and currently supervises several postgraduate students, and has published extensively in peer-review
 
remove_red_eye 100 forum 0 bar_chart Statistics share print
Share :
close
See all comments
 
Copyright © 1999-2021 Engormix - All Rights Reserved