What is the importance of continued surveillance of the food chain to detect emerging resistances?

The current study shows that intrinsically colistin resistant organisms are present in the food chain, particularly in food spoilage organisms...However, experience in other countries suggests that continued surveillance of the food chain is necessary to detect emerging resistances.

Polymyxin Resistant Bacteria in Australian Poultry

INTRODUCTION

Polymyxin B and E (colistin) are cationic antimicrobial peptides currently reserved as a last resort treatment for serious infections caused by multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria (Poirel et al., 2017). Although colistin has been used in human and veterinary medicine for over 50 years, it has recently become increasingly important in the treatment of infections with carbapenem-resistant organisms where few treatment options now remain. Enterobacteriaceae such as Serratia spp. and Proteus spp., as well as Gram-negative cocci such as Neisseria are well-known to be intrinsically resistant to colistin. However, less has been documented about other intrinsically colistin-resistant organisms in the food chain. The increased reliance on this agent has forced us to reconsider how polymyxins are used, particularly in light of the emergence of mobilisable colistin resistance.

The first plasmid mediated mechanism of polymyxin resistance (MCR-1) was identified in China (Liu et al., 2016) and since this initial observation it has been identified globally (Arcilla et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2018). The mcr-1 gene encodes a phosphorylethanolamine transferase enzyme (PEtN) that modifies the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria and reduces the binding of polymyxins and other cationic peptides. Plasmid mediated colistin resistance genes (mcr-like) have been reported in Enterobacteriales from humans, food, food-producing animals and the environment (Wang et al., 2018). Often the discovery of these genes in food and food animals proceeds their identification in humans (Liu et al., 2016). Colistin has also been used widely in animal rearing in many countries, and therefore may provide a selective pressure for the emergence of polymyxin resistance. This has led to some countries (China and Brazil) to ban the use of colistin in agriculture. To the best of our knowledge, polymyxins are not routinely used in animal production systems in Australia, although they may be used therapeutically in cattle and sheep (Australian Pesticides Veterinary Medicines Authority, 2014). A position statement form the Australian Chicken Meat Federation (ACMF) states that polymyxins have never been approved for use in Australian poultry, and therefore should never have been used in Australian chicken flocks (Australian Chicken Meat Federation, 2018). Consequently, little has been documented in Australia about whether there in colistin resistance in poultry, or more broadly within the food chain.

The current study sought to determine if polymyxin resistant pathogens, are present in the Australian food chain. Poultry were selected as there are many reports of colistin-resistant organisms associated with poultry (Ling et al., 2017; Monte et al., 2017; Apostolakos and Piccirillo, 2018). Birds were screened for colistin-resistant organism using a recently described bacterial culture media; CHROMagar COL-APSE (Abdul Momin et al., 2017). CHROMagar COL-APSE is a selective medium for the isolation and differentiation of colistin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The utility of this media for prospective screening of veterinary specimens is also defined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specimen Collection

Poultry were sampled immediately post-slaughter on two separate visits to the abattoir in Victoria, Australia during December 2016. On each trip, birds from three different farms were sampled (Farms A–C and D–F, respectively). With the exception of farm A (n = 29 birds), a minimum of 30 birds were sampled with from each farm. Swabs (Copan, Brescia, Italy) were taken from poultry by insertion in the cloaca and placed in Aimes transport media with charcoal before being returned to the laboratory for processing. All birds sampled were indoor raised (not free range) meat chickens.

CHROMagar COL-APSE media (CHROMagar, Paris) was prepared from dehydrated powders, autoclaved, and quality controlled locally. Swabs were plated directly onto CHROMagar COL-APSE and incubated at 37◦C for 24 h to screen for the carriage of polymyxin resistant Gram-negative bacteria present in the avian flora. The media was prepared with the addition of 50 mg/l 1 para-nitrophenyl glycerol (PNPG) to inhibit swarming of Proteusspp. Colistin resistant colonies were sub-cultured back on CHROMagar COL-APSE before long-term storage in brain-heart infusion broth (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) supplemented with 10% glycerol at −80◦C.

Bacterial Identification

All presumptive colistin-resistant bacteria were identified by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS, Bruker, Coventry, UK). Single colonies were spotted in triplicate onto the target plate and overlaid with 1 µl α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic-acid matrix (10 mg/ml). Target plates were analyzed using the Bruker Microflex MALDI-TOF MS running Biotyper v2. The database used was Version 3.0.2.0. Results with a score value of < 2.0 were discarded. A subset of isolates (including those which were not identified by the MALDI-TOF) had their identity confirmed by PCR amplification and DNA sequencing of their 16s rRNA genes (Weisburg et al., 1991). Biochemical testing including malonate assimilation and β-glucosidase activity were performed as described elsewhere (Huys et al., 2010).

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Determination of Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs)

Susceptibility to 11 antibiotic agents including, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (30 µg), cephalexin (30 µg), cefpodoxime (10 µg), imipenem (10 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), streptomycin (10 µg), enrofloxacin (5 µg), nalidixic acid (30 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), doxycycline (30 µg), and cotrimoxazole (25 µg) were assessed in disc diffusion assays on Mueller-Hinton agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK). The Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints were used to define resistance where available (Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, 2018). In the absence of guidelines for interpretation, the CLSI guidelines for Enterobacteriaceae were used. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of colistin and polymyxin B were determined by agar dilution.

Detection of MCR-like Genes

Genes encoding colistin resistance genes mcr-1, -2, -3,-4, and -5 were amplified using the polymerase chain reaction and primers and conditions described elsewhere (Liu et al., 2016; Xavier et al., 2016; Yin et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2018).

DNA Sequencing

Selected isolates were further investigated by DNA sequencing using the Minion platform (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). The Rapid Sequencing Kit (SQK-RAD004) was used as per the manufacturer’s instructions and the resulting reads analyzed by EPI2ME and the online AMR workflow.

Whole Genome Sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA) and the closest reference genome was identified using Kraken. The reads were mapped to the reference genome using Burrows-Wheeler aligner “mem” (BWA-mem) algorithm version 2. A de novo assembly of the reads was performed using SPAdes version 3.7.1, and the reads were again mapped back to the resultant contigs using BWA-mem. Annotation was performed by the NCBI Prokaryote Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) version 4.6.

RESULTS

A total of 213 birds from six different farms were sampled at a chicken processing facility. From these specimens, 57 (26.8%) yielded colistin-resistant Gram-negative organisms (Table 1). The most commonly (40/57; 70.2%) recovered organism was identified as Hafnia alvei. Other organisms which were recovered on CHROMagar COL-APSE media included Aeromonas hydrophila (n = 9; 16.1%), Alcaligenes faecalis (n = 3; 5.3%), and Myroides odoratus (n = 4; 7.1%). A single isolate could not be identified by the Bruker MALDI-TOF system. Sequencing of the 16 rRNA gene identified the isolate as Pseudochrobactrum spp. The growth characteristics of each of these organisms on CHROMagar COL-APSE media is demonstrated in Figure 1.

TABLE 1 | Distribution of polymyxin-resistant organisms recovered from Victorian poultry farms.

FIGURE 1 | Colistin-resistant organisms grown on CHROMagar COL-APSE agar for 48 h; (A) Aeromonas hydrophila isolate C17; (B) Alcaligenes faecalis isolate F12; (C) Hafnia paralvei isolate E14; (D) Myroides odoratus isolate B27; (E) Pseudochrobactrum spp. isolate F17; (F) E. coli ATCC 25922.

The Hafnia isolates had an MIC90 for colistin and polymyxin B of 8 and 16µg/ml, respectively (Table 2). Resistance to other antimicrobials was low among the Hafnia isolates, with the exception of AmpC mediated resistance to β-lactams (Table 3). As others have documented, the Bruker MALDI-TOF system cannot currently distinguish between the two Hafnia species: H. alvei and H. paralvei (Jayol et al., 2017). To determine which species these isolates belonged to, phenotypic testing using malonate assimilation and β-glucosidase activity was performed. These two tests have been shown to reliably discriminate between the two Hafnia species (Huys et al., 2010; Abbott et al., 2011). Based upon these biochemical tests all the Hafnia isolates were determined to be H. paralvei. To verify this a single isolate was submitted for whole genome sequencing which agreed with the phenotypic identification. This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession JAAIKS000000000. The version described in this paper is version JAAIKS010000000.

TABLE 2 | Colistin and polymyxin B MICs of colistin-resistant organisms recovered from Victorian poultry farms.

TABLE 3 | Susceptibility to non-polymyxin antibiotics among polymyxin-resistant organisms recovered from Victorian poultry farms.

The level of polymyxin resistance varied among the other bacterial species: A. faecalis isolates had colistin and polymyxin B MICs of 1–4µg/ml and 0.5–2µg/ml, respectively. M. odoratus and Pseudochrobactrum spp. isolates had higher MICs of ≥128µg/ml for colistin and ≥64µg/ml for polymyxin B. Polymyxin MICs for A. hydrophila were the most variable ranging from 2 to ≥256µg/ml for both colistin, and polymyxin B. Among these bacteria, Aeromonas species have previously been shown to harbor mcr-3 and mcr-5 like resistance genes (Ling et al., 2017; Ma et al., 2018). All nine isolates were screened by PCR for the presence of mcr-1, -2, -3,−4, and -5 genes and all were negative. Two isolates (A17 and C17, from farm A and C, respectively) were further investigated by MinION DNA sequencing. These isolates were chosen as they represent two different polymyxin resistance phenotypes (colistin/polymyxin B MICs of ≥256/≥256µg/ml and 64/8µg/ml, respectively). This revealed the presence of an arnA-like gene, which encodes a UDP-glucuronic acid (UDP-GlcUA) decarboxylase which may contribute toward their polymyxin resistance.

This was the only gene identified in the AMR workflow that might contribute to polymyxin resistance. While polymyxins are not routinely used in poultry production in Australia, several other classes of antimicrobial are used, primarily for the control of coccidiosis (Australian Pesticides Veterinary Medicines Authority, 2014). To assess if intrinsic colistin resistance is associated with resistance to other antibiotics, all isolates were tested against 12 unrelated antimicrobials (Table 3). The isolates recovered were generally susceptible to most other antibiotic classes (β-lactams, quinolones, aminoglycosides), with the notable exception of M. odoratus which was resistant to all the aminoglycosides tested as well as cephalexin, cotrimoxazole and nalidixic acid.

DISCUSSION

Polymyxin resistant organisms were recovered from Australian poultry samples, however all the organisms recovered have been previously described as intrinsically resistant to polymyxins. A notable exception is A. hydrophila, in which mcr genes have been previously detected, however no mcr-like genes were detected in the current study.

Colistin resistance, both acquired and intrinsic, is thought to occur by modification of the Gram-negative cell wall. Acquired colistin resistance encoded by mcr genes imparts resistance by catalyzing the addition of phosphoethanolamine (PEtN) to lipid A reducing the overall negative charge of the cell wall and therefore the binding affinity to polymyxins. LPS modification is also responsible for intrinsic polymyxin resistance in several bacterial species due to 4-amino-4-deoxy-L-arabinose (L-Ara4N) substitution (Olaitan et al., 2014). However, mechanisms of intrinsic colistin resistance remain unelucidated for many bacterial species.

CHROMagar COL-APSE media was successfully used for the detection and isolation of polymyxin-resistant organisms from veterinary specimens. Moreover, the media was suitable for direct inoculation from veterinary swabs. This media has been shown to be highly sensitive in the detection of organisms with acquired colistin resistance (Abdul Momin et al., 2017) and this current study further validates the utility of CHROMagar COL-APSE as a media for detection of organisms with intrinsic colistin-resistance.

CHROMagar COL-APSE performed well in the recovery of colistin-resistant organisms, including swabs with heavy fecal contamination. The ubiquity of Proteus, a bacterial genus intrinsically resistant to polymyxins, within the samples prompted the addition of the reagent PNPG. Proteus presents as a characteristic brown colony on CHROMagar COL-APSE media and its swarming motility quickly obscured other growth on the media. PNPG abolishes the swarming behavior of Proteus facilitating identification of other resistant organisms. Recent formulations of CHROMagar COL-APSE have found the addition of cefixime to be useful for the suppression of Proteus.

Of the polymyxin-resistant organisms recovered from Australian poultry Hafnia spp. were predominant. This genus is known to exhibit intrinsic resistance to polymyxins, and sequencing of 16S rRNA genes has revealed Hafnia to be phylogenetically related to other intrinsically colistin resistant members of the Enterobacteriales including Serratia spp. (Jayol et al., 2017). H. alvei was found as the most commonly isolated colistin-resistant organism from livestock in Switzerland, although it was not recovered from poultry, only from pigs and calves (Buess et al., 2017). Hafnia paralvei was only recently recognized as a distinct species (Huys et al., 2010). The H. paralvei isolates in the current study had median colistin and polymyxin B MICs of 8 and 16µg/ml, comparable to what has been determined for the wild type population of this species elsewhere (Jayol et al., 2017). Little is known of the importance of H. paralvei as a veterinary pathogen. The biochemical characteristics of H. paralvei match those previously described as H. alvei genetic group 2: the same study, examining the ecology of Hafnia in Australia, found genetic group 1 was most commonly associated with birds (Okada and Gordon, 2003).

Aeromonas is a bacterial genera also considered intrinsically resistant to polymyxins. One Australian study found 44.5% of 193 Aeromonas isolates to have a colistin MIC ≥2µg/ml by agar dilution testing (Aravena-Roman et al., 2012). More recently, Aeromonas spp. have been reported to carry acquired colistin resistance gene variants: mcr-3 has been detected in several Aeromonas species (Ling et al., 2017; Shen et al., 2018) and mcr-5 has been detected in A. hydrophila (Ma et al., 2018). Additionally, A. hydrophila appears to encompass a wide distribution of colistin MICs, with one collection of (78 isolates) ranging from < 0.25 to > 256µg/ml by microbroth dilution testing after low-dose colistin induction (Fosse et al., 2003). The isolates described in our study fall within this MIC range, but were not shown to harbor any mcr-1, -2, -3,-4, or -5 like genes. DNA sequencing of two isolates identified the gene arnA, which may play a role in the polymyxin resistance observed in these isolates. ArnA is the first enzyme specific to the pathway which imparts polymyxin resistance by modification of lipid A of the outer membrane LPS with a 4-amino-4-deoxy-L-arabinose moiety (Breazeale et al., 2005). ArnA is bifunctional enzyme which catalyses firstly the decarboxylation of UDP-Glucuronic acid (UDP-GlcA) and subsequently formylates UDP-Ara4N (Gatzeva-Topalova et al., 2005).

Little has been documented about the MIC range and mechanisms of polymyxin resistance in the three other Gram-negative species identified: A. faecalis, M. odoratus, and Pseudochrobactrum. A study by Jacquier et al. found six of seven (86%) French isolates of A. faecalis had a colistin MIC ≥2µg/ml (Jacquier et al., 2012), consistent with the susceptibility of the strains recovered here. M. odoratus (formerly Flavobacterium odoratum) is a Gram-negative non-fermentative opportunistic pathogen reportedly intrinsically resistant to many antibiotics, including polymyxins (Holmes et al., 1979). Colistin MICs for wild-type M. odoratus have previously been quantified at 32–256µg/ml, although the mechanism of resistance has not been elucidated (Holmes et al., 1979; Gunzer et al., 2018). The genus Pseudochrobactrum was only described in 2006 (Kämpfer et al., 2006), and little is known of its clinical significance and associated antibiotic susceptibility.

The majority of the intrinsically polymyxin-resistant organisms identified in the current study have also well documented as meat spoilage organisms. Hafnia spp. in particular are important in spoilage of many different meat products including chicken meat (Säde et al., 2013; Höll et al., 2016), beef (Doulgeraki et al., 2011), and lamb (Kaur et al., 2017). Aeromonas spp. have also been associated with spoilage of poultry meat (Zhang et al., 2012). This implies that the polymyxin-resistant organisms survive poultry processing and will disseminate down the food chain, where traits could be passed on to human pathogens (Teale, 2002). Importantly, little is known about the mechanism of resistance in these organisms, and therefore the potential for the “escape” of resistance genes by horizontal gene transfer. There is a precedent for this: it has been hypothesized that the mcr-3 gene, for example, may have originated in Aeromonas species, and is now widespread in Enterobacteriaceae (Shen et al., 2018).

Colistin is not registered for use in any species of animal in Australia (Animal Health Australia, 2017; Australian Chicken Meat Federation, 2018). Acquired polymyxin resistance remains rare in Australia with only a single report in humans (Ellem et al., 2017) and another in silver gulls (Mukerji et al., 2019). Despite this, the current study shows that intrinsically colistin resistant organisms are present in the food chain, particularly in food spoilage organisms. CHROMagar COL-APSE was a useful media for the recovery of these organisms. It remains to be determined if these pose a significant threat to human health. However, experience in other countries suggests that continued surveillance of the food chain is necessary to detect emerging resistances.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found here: PRJNA606458, SAMN14091501.

ETHICS STATEMENT

Ethical review and approval was not required for the animal study because animals were sampled post-slaughter.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors played an integral part of the project completion. Each author has read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Specifically, DB, SW, and DW conceived and designed the experiments. DB and SW performed the experiments. DB, SW, MA, and DW analyzed the data. DB, MA, and DW wrote the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The assistance of the staff of the Victorian poultry processing plant with obtaining the poultry cloacal swabs was gratefully acknowledged. Thanks also to CHROMagar for the generous gift of CHROMagar COL-APSE culture media.

This article was originally published in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 4:550318. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.550318. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCBY).