A substrate-based approach to enzyme selection and prediction of associated matrix values in broiler diets
Published:July 2, 2013
By:Peter Plumstead, N. Sriperm, M. Cunha, and L.F. Romero
(Danisco Animal Nutrition, Dupont Industrial Biosciences, Marlborough, Wiltshire, UK.)
High energy and protein prices and volatility of grain, fat, and oilseed meal markets have resulted in shifts in feed ingredient use and increased application of a wide variety of exogenous enzymes to reduce feed cost. However, the choice of enzyme and subsequent application of matrix values are often done with little regard of the substrate levels in the diets that are being targeted. This discord between feed substrates and the class of enzymes being applied has contributed to inconsistent enzyme responses, and nutritionists taking take a generic and conservative view of enzyme matrix values that do not allow maximum feed cost-savings to be achieved. A basic principle when selecting any exogenous enzyme is that the specific enzyme must be effective at targeting nutrients in the diet that are not completely digested by the broiler’s own endogenous enzymes. For example, it is well known that phytate is not inherently well digested, which provides the basis for phytase enzyme use. However, although phytase effects on energy and amino acid digestibility are significantly influenced by the dietary phytate level, phytate substrate levels are frequently not considered when selecting the optimal phytase dose or assigning corresponding matrix values to the enzyme. In a similar manner, the substrate fractions that determine the energy response from ‘carbohydrase’ enzyme can be divided into five main fractions namely, starch, non-starch polysaccharides (NSP), sugars, protein, and fat. For protease enzymes, effects on amino acid digestibility have been shown to also not be constant, but are dependent on the level of each amino acid in the diet and its inherent digestibility. A better understanding of the substrate levels in the diet and the associated enzyme response is required and will allow for a more accurate selection of the class of enzyme to use and its associated nutrient contribution in formulation.
Key words: Broiler, enzyme, substrate, energy digestibility, amino acid digestibility
A substrate based approach to enzyme use is a good idea. But its pre-requisite would be to quantify the targeted substrate in the prospective feed formula. This may increase the complexities in the whole process - but it would increase the accuracy and one would be able to quantify the enzyme response as well.
Absolutely correct. one of the way for NSP degrading enzymes is that an accurate and fast determination of reductions in in vitro viscosities of the household cereal grains in the feed mill. Degree of reduced viscosity would definitely provide a decision what enzymes at which level to be included in the compound feed. Novel enzymes have now a strong formulation to achieve this as compared to to old fashioned enzymes.
One of the most challenging problem in the enzyme industry nowadays is that how to quantify the feed substrate for enzyme use? Most matrix values of a commercial enzyme are used in a generalized manner wherein it reflects all the matrices both on the substrate and non-substrate ingredient. To achieve full efficiency and feed cost benefits, feed enzyme companies should device ways on how to accurately target the substrates within a certain formulation beyond what there matrix values can give.
IT WILL BE DEFINITELY HELPFUL TO POULTRY INDUSTRY BECAUSE FOR THREE YEARS THE RAW MATERIAL PRICES ARE VERY MUCH VOLATILE AND IF WE CAN CONCLUDE SOMEWHERE NEAR THE MATRIX VALUES,ECONOMICALLY IT WILL BE VERY BENEFICIAL.
Recommend
Reply
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.