PCV2 vaccine cross-protection: Identification of sequences in successfully vaccinated field cases
Published:February 18, 2026
Source :B. Payne 1*, A. Jacobs 2, C. Dvorak 3, M. Murtaugh 3 / 1 Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc., St. Joseph; 2 Health Management Center (HMC) BIVI, Ames; 3 Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota (U of M), Minnesota, United States.
Summary
Keywords: Cross-protection, Sequencing, Vaccine
Introduction:
It is necessary to evaluate emerging PCV2 isolates in both control and clinical cases in order to determine the importance and impact of novel mutations. The primary objective of this study was to identify PCV2 isolates in herds where production performance was meeting the system’s expectations, no clinical PCVAD signs were apparent, and the organization was satisfied with the vaccine.
Materials and Methods:
Farms (n=48, 10 unique systems) were selected using the following criteria: 1) use of Ingelvac CircoFLEX® at weaning age, 2) pig owner and veterinarian were satisfied with vaccine, 3) pig performance was meeting systems’ expectations and 4) no clinical health issues suggestive of PCVAD present. Serum (n=432 samples;23 farms), oral fluids (OF;n=168 samples;24 farms) and lung homogenate (n=1 sample) were collected. Individual pig serum and OF samples were PCV2 tested (HMC, Ames, IA) using TaqMan real-time PCR reagents with a detection limit of below 3.5 genomic equivalents/reaction. Lung tissues were sent to ISU-VDL for PCV2 PCR. Farms’ (n=16) samples were targeted for lower Cq values with a PCR cycle quantity (Cq) ≤32 for serum (n=16), Cq≤30 for OF (n=11) and for tissues (n=1; Cq=19.3) to be sent to U of MN for PCV2 capsid gene sequencing with quality analysis performed within DNAstar (Madison, WI). Each isolate was further characterized based on standards and dendrograms were created.
Results:
Twenty-seven farms had PCV2 PCR positives (12, 15 and 5 from serum, OF, lung homogenate, respectively) of which 44 samples (24, 17 and 3 from serum, OF, lung homogenate, respectively) were sent for sequencing. There was an overall 91% sequencing success rate (87% for serum, 94% for OF, 100% for tissue homogenate). Forty total samples were successfully sequenced and characterized as PCV2a (n=3), PCV2b (n=21) or PCV2d (n=16).
Conclusion:
Vaccination strategies have decreased the presence of PCV2, yet it remains in the barn environment and vaccinated populations. Though not reflective of the population, the biased sampling of PCV2 PCR-positive samples based on Cq level allowed for a more economically beneficial success rate on sequencing. No farms with multiple sequences on samples had homologies less than 100% (amino acid comparison), indicating that the same strain was found multiple times in the same farm in multiple pigs. Although there were forty sequences, via capsid sequencing, there was only a maximum 3% heterology amongst these samples. In this study, vaccinated pigs showed no clinical signs of PCVAD and met the systems’ performance expectations, while still being exposed to a wide range of modern PCV2 strains. Although mutations may occur the commercial PCV2 vaccines appear to remain efficacious.
Disclosure of Interest: None Declared.
Published in the proceedings of the International Pig Veterinary Society Congress – IPVS2016. For information on the event, past and future editions, check out https://www.theipvs.com/future-congresses/.