Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

Mycotoxins in Dairy Cattle

Mycotoxins in Dairy Cattle

Published: November 15, 2011
By: Damian Moore (Meriden Animal Health)
Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by fungi. When ingested by livestock, mycotoxins can cause production losses, ill thrift and reduced disease resistance. Initially the effects of mycotoxins may go unnoticed, however with prolonged ingestion the effects of mycotoxins can become more pronounced. The effects of mycotoxins range greatly depending on the mycotoxins present and the species of animal affected. In cattle scouring, hemorrhaging, displaced abomasums, reduced fertility and abortions can indicate the presence of a mycotoxin. Mycotoxins are also immunosuppressive and the only clinical signs that may occur are those of a secondary infection, with no signs of any mycotoxicosis. Another complicating factor is that the effects of the mycotoxins are amplified under different stresses (including production and environment), which would explain the greater susceptibility by both dairy and feedlot cattle.
There are over 500 secondary fungal metabolites, but globally aflatoxin B1 (AfB1), deoxynivalenol (DON), fumonisins (FUM), ochratoxin A (OTA) and zearalenone (ZEA) are considered the most significant.
Mould growth and toxin production are generally influenced by a variety of plant and environmental factors, particularly climatic conditions (e.g. temperature and humidity). Fusarium sp, commonly referred to as field fungi, can occur in the field and are more prevalent during a moist growing season. Further growth of Fusarium sp can also occur during grain storage. In addition, storage fungi like Aspergillus and Penicilliumsp. are more likely to proliferate and produce mycotoxins when moisture content ranges from 14 to 18% and when temperatures vary between 10 to 50°C.
Mycotoxin contamination of crop and the ensuing consumption of contaminated feed ingredients by animals is an inevitable part of animal production system. Mycotoxins produce wide range of injurious effects in animals in addition to food borne hazards to humans. Ruminants diet generally includes both forages and concentrate and has an increased probability of multiple mycotoxin contamination.
Aflatoxins
Aflatoxins are generally produced by the Aspergillussp. which prefer a temperature range of 100C to 500C and a moisture content of 14% to 18%. It most commonly occurs on grains, however recent survey work has indicated that it is also present on forages.
The Aspergillus sp produces four mycotoxins (aflatoxin B1 (AfB1), aflatoxin B2 (AfB2), aflatoxin G1 (AfG1) and aflatoxin G2 AfG2)). Aflatoxins are regarded as a class one carcinogen, and are regulated in many foods. Aflatoxin B1 is metabolised by the rumen into Aflatoxin M1 and is carried over into the milk of dairy cattle with in 12 hours of ingestion. In many countries there are regulatory limits of M1 in the milk. For example, the limit in Europe is 0.05ppb, while it is 0.5ppb in North America. To maintain the level of aflatoxin M1 below 0.05ppb in the milk, the maximum level in the feed would need to be 20ppb AfB1. This is also the maximum level recomended in the European Union.
Aflatoxins are commonly referred to as hepatoxic as they affect the function of the liver and decrease protein production.  Due to this effect on the liver, aflatoxin can lead to a reduced feed intake and reductions in feed conversion efficiency and milk production up to 25%. They are also immunosuppressive, and secondary infections can occur without the clinical signs of aflatoxicosis. Chronic low levels of aflatoxin B1 (under 5ppb) have been shown to have a strong relationship in causing lameness and cystic ovaries in dairy cattle.
Vomitoxin (Deoxynivalenol, DON,)
As the name suggests, this mycotoxin causes a reduction in feed intake and at high levels will cause vomiting in livestock. DON is produced by the Fusarium sp of fungi. These fungal species are endemic to Australia and are associated with Crown Rot in cereal crops, hence increasing the risk of mycotoxin contamination of many cereal straws.
The ruminant can naturally deactivate DON, but this is usually limited to only around 30% and will often depend on the stability of the rumen and fiber levels.
There are many different Fusarium mycotoxins, with the more notable being deoxynivalenol (DON), Diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS), T-2 Toxin and Nivalenol (NIV).  In the United States, DON is commonly found in the corn crops.  It is regarded a "field" mycotoxin, as it is commonly produced during the growth of the crop rather than the storage. However, if the crop is harvested with the fungus present, it may multiply under favorable storage conditions.
As mentioned DON is most commonly associated with reduced feed intakes, however it can also cause ruminitis and scouring in cattle. DON has a strong immunosuppressive effect on the animal, and secondary infections can be common. In North America levels of 800ppb DON have been associated with a 2.0 liter per day decrease in milk production.
Zearalenone (ZEA)
Zearalenone is another mycotoxin produced by the Fusarium sp., and therefore it is very common to find DON and ZEA together. ZEA has strong oestrogenic activity, and the effect in the animal is much more defined than with other mycotoxins. ZEA is responsible for a reduction in fertility and conception rates in breeding cattle and for causing abortions. In addition, ZEA can lead to an enlarged reproductive tract in the animal and can cause atrophy of the ovaries.
The National Residue Survey (Australia) undertaken from 1998-2004 found that 50% of all cattle tested were positive for ZEA and or its derivatives, and that the level of ZEA in the animals was greater in higher rainfall areas. ZEA contaminated straw has been implicated in long fed feedlot cattle deaths in SE Qld associated with increased blood glucose levels.
Fumonisin (FUM)
Fumonisin B1 and Fumonisin B2 are also mycotoxins produced by Fusarium sp., and can co-occur with DON and ZEA. Levels of 100ppm FUM ingestion can reduce milk production and increase serum enzyme levels, possibly indicating some liver damage.  Horses are very susceptible to FUM, with levels of 10ppm being associated with leukoencephalomalacia.
It is carcinogenic and causes liver damage, lower milk production and reduced feed consumption in dairy cattle. Dairy cattle may be more sensitive to fumonosins than beef cattle due to greater production stress
Ochratoxin A (OA)
Ochratoxin is produced by Aspergillus and Penicillium sp. It causes polyuria, depression, decreased weight gain, low specific gravity of urine and dehydration but it is rapidly degraded in the rumen and thus thought to be of little consequence for ruminants. There is not a lot of clinical data on the effect of OA in cattle as most of it is degraded in the rumen; however OA has been implicated in kidney damage, scouring and reduced milk production.
Ergot alkaloids
In general there are two groups of fungi which produce ergot alkaloids, the first being from the Claciceps sp which is present on grain crops including rye, wheat, barley and sorghum, and the second being from the plant endophyte neotyphodium sp, which is commonly found both in perennial rye grass and tall fescue pastures. Both pose risks to ruminant production however as ruminants consume large amounts of pasture as the base of their diets, the endophyte has a greater impact on animal production. The rye grass endophyte produces a number of different toxins, while the two major toxins are ergovaline and lolitrem-B, while the endophyte in tall fescue generally only produces ergovaline and not lolitrom-B. Although the endophyte protects the plant from insects and drought, the toxins produced do have a negative impact on animal production. Most ruminants are susceptible to ergot alkaloids including cattle, sheep and alpacas.
The ergot alkaloids are responsible for causing vaso-constriction in animals, which reduces the ability of the animal to maintain a normal body temperature and ultimately leads to heat stress. They have also been shown to cause a reduction in feed intake or total feed refusal in cattle. Ergot alkaloids are also responsible for reducing the level of the hormone prolactin, which is essential for milk production, leading to a decrease in milk yield. Other effects of ergovaline and lolitrem-B include increased nervousness, scouring, summer ill thrift, reduced fertility and even death.
The subclinical effects of ergovaline and lolitrem-B often go unnoticed and undiagnosed in dairy cattle, with temperament changes and milking difficulties blamed on many other factors other than ergot alkaloids.
Mycotoxin Occurrence
Mycotoxins contamination is more common with grain, and there have been limited studies on the contamination of other feeds regularly consumed by ruminants. Straw is a common fiber source use by dairy and feedlot cattle, but most often quality is defined by visual examination and odour. The table bellows demonstrates that straw can be source of mycotoxin contamination, and that in the same study there was no correlation between the visual aspects of the straw and the contamination levels. It is also important to note that the straw samples covered a wide cross section of growing conditions and that three quarters of the samples came from a dry growing environment.
Mycotoxin concentration (mg/kg) of straw samples (Australian Pig Science Association Conference, 2005)
Mycotoxins in Dairy Cattle - Image 1
Further work in Australia also demonstrated that mycotoxins not only occurred in the straw either fed to animal or used as litter for the animals, but that also forages including fresh pasture, silage and hay were also a source of contamination in feeds and that nearly 50% of all samples can be positive for one or more mycotoxins.
Mycotoxin concentrations in samples of, forages and straw (Australian Society of Animal Production, 2008)
Mycotoxins in Dairy Cattle - Image 2
In another study to highlight the issue, an number of dairies were selected and the feed used on these farms were then analysised for mycotoxin contamination, and the results below, indicate that there is a considerable risk of mycotoxin contamination to many of the commonly used feeds in cattle production.
Mycotoxin Occurrence in Victorian Dairy Feedstuffs  (Australian Dairy Science Conference, 2007)
Mycotoxins in Dairy Cattle - Image 3
Managing Mycotoxins
As can be seen from the survey work done, mycotoxins are present in many feedstuffs, and ultimately animals are exposed to them in varying degrees. Mycotoxins are very heat stable, and feed processing such as pelleting and extruding does not reduce the levels in the feed. They are also resistant to fermentation, and storage of feedstuffs over a long period of time does not reduce them.
Physical elimination of the mycotoxins involves using a proven and tested product, which will adsorb the mycotoxin and prevent adsorption by the animal.
Related topics:
Authors:
Damian Moore
Meriden Animal Health Limited
Recommend
Comment
Share
Lee Jianhui
29 de enero de 2013

thank you,
Who can tell me the purchase department 's link details? tephone,Email and link man?

Recommend
Reply
Damian Moore
Meriden Animal Health Limited
8 de diciembre de 2011

Thanks Fermin,
Cheers

Recommend
Reply
Fermin Barrenechea
7 de diciembre de 2011
Dear Damian, Very interesting research and discussion. Thank you for sharing. All the best. Cheers!
Recommend
Reply
Damian Moore
Meriden Animal Health Limited
24 de noviembre de 2011
From personal experience, and from the results from survey work I have done in SW Victoria nearly all pasture is contaminated with ZEA and DON at levels ranging from 500ppb up to 70ppm, and also the fact that in our National residue Survey all animals tested from this area had traces of ZEA and or the metabolites and we do not have a major problem with fertility there. Also the research will indicate that levels of 1ppm will cause abortions. I have also experienced in feedlots, levels of 26ppm has caused diabetes and mortalities. I think the question of tolerance really depends on production, stress, days in milk and a number of other stressors . It is also important to remember that mycotoxins are not the only contamination, and there are many plant toxins and oestrogen's which can cause similar issues. From all my experiences, ergovaline is probably the biggest issue in terms of mycotoxins for much cattle and dairy production in the world. Cheers
Recommend
Reply
Erwan Leroux
Neovia
24 de noviembre de 2011

Dear Mr Moore,
I apologize myself if you were disturb on my comment. The aim wasn’t to promote a product but to support your speech on the possible effects of mycotoxin for ruminants. But the only one way to convince people is to give then examples. It was the only one objective of my comment.
However, most of the time it’s very difficult the have a very clear diagnose of mycotoxins (ergot alkaloids are almost an exception). I’m not agreeing with you about the fact that ruminants are not sensitive to zearalenon (Weaver and al., 1986b, as an example). It has been proved by several studies, even at very low dosage (60 ppb). For the DON, Whitlow and al. (1994) proved for example an average milk production correlated with the contamination of DON (between 500 and 900 ppb). As you, I will not say that ruminants are strongly sensitive to mycotoxins but in some conditions, mycotoxins will definitely act negatively on the animals.
Cheers

Recommend
Reply
Damian Moore
Meriden Animal Health Limited
23 de noviembre de 2011
Erwan Leroux Hello Erwan, I will not comment much on your comments as I think that anyone who can try and sell their own product of someone else's article does not have very high work ethics. Coments on the article would be fine, but to sell your own product please do all the research yourself. As to your points, cattle are very tolerant of ZEA, mainly due to how they metabolise it, and also explains why pigs are not. Catlle are very tolerant of many mycotoxins, and with many there are some clinical signs for most. Even Afb1 can be detected in milk, but also higher liver enzymes levels can help identify it. Ergot Alkaloids have very clear signs, but most often mis diagnosed. Does ZEA and DON really affect cattle. I am not totally convinced yet, although there is work that shows associations, but nothing definite, and when binders are used and we see improvements, again it is only associative as there are so many other variables. Thanks for your comments but please next time write your own article to sell your own product. Cheers
Recommend
Reply
Damian Moore
Meriden Animal Health Limited
23 de noviembre de 2011
Dr.tadimeti Hanumanta Hello Dr Tadimeti, Thank you for your comments. I think you will find many tried and tested product on the market which are effective against many mycotoxins. Meriden have a range under the Fusion Banner which are very effect also. For more information please go to the Meriden website and express your interest there. Johan De Paepe Hello Johan. Interms of what products, in simple terms not all clays and HSAC work the same and even if you intend to use a very cheap one, again do some research and determine that it will bind the major toxins as Afb1, Fumonism and even ergovaline. There are still cheap binders available which are still around the $1-2 mark. The point I like to make is that you do not need to spend the large amount of money which has been the case in the past. Again if you would like specific information please contact the Meriden web site. Cheers Rajesh Aggarwal Hello Rajesh, I do agree in principle in what you do say. The topic of mycotoxins and how they impact cattle product is probably less understood than many other species. On factor that does impact this is production, and in India the level of production is much lower than say the US or Aust and because of this the cattle in India would appear more tolerant. Basically the higher the production the greater the impact. In saying that, there is also a big difference between feeding mould and mycotoxins, and just because see mould does not mean you have mycotoxins. Remember that mycotoxins are secondary mycotoxins, and tend to only be produced when the mould is stressed. I have feed some silages here during the drought which has been covered in mould and not had any clinical issues. I would like to point out that the point of the article is to highlight the fact that for cattle the risk of mycotoxins ingestion is greater from forages and not grains, and also that the mould and toxin production in forages decrease from the ground up and the highest risks are closer to the ground, so cutting the pasture lower or grazing lower to the ground increases the risk. Again it will depends on the toxins, as with ergot alkaloids they will affect animals at whatever level of production, and personally this range of toxins have more of an impact on cattle production that many others. I will be doing another article on this in the coming weeks.
Recommend
Reply
Erwan Leroux
Neovia
23 de noviembre de 2011

Dear all,

As Mr Moore wrote, it’s now established that ruminants can be sensitive to mycotoxins. Of course we can not said that ruminants are as sensitive than pigs or poultry are. But until few years ago, everybody were thinking that ruminants were protected by their rumine. However more and more studies are showing that it’s not true, and in some case the rumine will degraded mycotoxins in metabolites even more dangerous (for example it’s the case of the zearalenon).

Most of time, the mycotoxins in dairy production will not be the only one reason of a disorder, but they will increase the impact of an unbalance ration, or will decrease the immune response of a viral or bacterial disease. So it’s very complicated to diagnose a mycotoxicosis in ruminants.

It has also been proved the carcinogenic effect of the Aflatoxins M1 (metabolite of the Aflatoxin B1) into the dairy milk for humans. That why most of the countries worldwide have a dedicated legislation on the acceptable level of Aflatoxin M1 in the milk…

To get back to the Mr Moore document, I’m completely agreed with him about the important necessity to use “a proven and tested product, which will adsorb mycotoxin and prevent adsorption by the animal”. It very hard to insure this capacity but with the product T5X we completed it ! We proved in 9 different herds in France that we choose for their possible mycotoxins contaminations, that when we added this product the milk production increased by 2 litter, the protein and fat yields increased, but also the somatic cell counts of the milk decreased and the ingestion increased. All these parameters shown that also in commercial farms, with contamination levels that could be easily found in France, mycotoxins can be considered as negligible. In an other trial in Italy, always in farms, we reduced the level of aflatoxin M1 into the milk by over 60% only 2 days after starting the distribution of the same product.

Of course, there is still many things to discover on this topic, but at least now it proved that ruminants are sensitive to mycotoxins, and there is at least one solution available on the market to counteract their effects !

Staying at your disposal for further explanations,

Recommend
Reply
Dr.Tadimeti Hanumanta
Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
23 de noviembre de 2011

Dear Dr. Shankar
An Interesting Conclusion from a Scientific Person
But, just because we donot observe the symptoms of Mycotoxins in Dairy Cattle, can we negate the affect of Subclinical Mycotoxicosis?

Recommend
Reply
Rajesh Aggarwal
Bayer
23 de noviembre de 2011

Dear Mr.Moore,

Its a concise information on Mycotoxins. However, India being the largest milk producer in the world with industry dominated by backyard to semi organised to organised farms. I have seen people producing feed that are used for feeding animals for almost 3 months. Physically there is lot of caking up and needless to mention the heat, humidity conducive for fungal growth.

After extensive discussions and observations with experts here, Iam of the opinion that Mycotoxins are NOT such a major issue for Cattle as much as it is for Poultry. Nobody adds a toxin binder to Cattle feed here with few exceptions cannot be ruled out. The levels of mycotoxins differs in Poultry between layer to broiler to breeder and unless there is exceptionally high levels of intake for prolonged period of time, I dont see mycotoxins are a issue for Dairy cattle.

Dr.Shankar

Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Mycotoxins
Don Giesting
Don Giesting
Cargill
Biz Dev Mgr/Cargill
United States
Bart Dunsford
Bart Dunsford
dsm-Firmenich
United States
Enrique Angulo Cedeño
Enrique Angulo Cedeño
MSD - Merck Animal Health
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.