Explore
Communities in English
Advertise on Engormix

Using Relative Humidity Indicator Paper to Measure Seed and Commodity Moisture Contents

Published: January 3, 2019
By: Kent J. Bradford, Peetambar Dahal, and Pedro Bello. / Seed Biotechnology Center, Dep. of Plant Sciences, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Summary

Declines of seed viability in storage and losses of stored commodities due to fungal spoilage and insect pests are promoted by high moisture content. However, measuring seed or grain moisture content in the field can be difficult, particularly in rural locations in developing countries. Because seed/commodity moisture content is uniquely related to equilibrium relative humidity at a given temperature, moisture content can be estimated by measuring the relative humidity of a sample enclosed in a sealed container. Relative humidity can be measured using electronic meters, or even more inexpensively using indicator paper that changes color in response to relative humidity. We describe this method and provide a spreadsheet to convert relative humidity to moisture content for many common seeds and commodities. This simple method can be used in the field for quickly estimating seed or commodity moisture content to determine whether further drying is needed or is suitable for storage, milling or other uses.

The longevity of seeds in storage is highly sensitive to their moisture content (MC) and temperature (Ellis and Roberts, 1981). In general, the duration of seed viability (germination capacity) in storage is reduced by half for every 1% increase in MC (fresh weight basis) or 6°C increase in temperature (Ellis and Roberts, 1980; Harrington, 1972). Controlling storage temperature on a large scale is costly, particularly in tropical climates, and often is not economically feasible in developing countries; however, drying (and hermetic packaging) is a low-cost approach to extend seed longevity (Ellis, 1988; IIVR, 2016). Maintaining viability is not an issue for stored dry commodities (e.g., grains, pulses, dried fruits or herbs), but storage at low MC is still critical for the preservation of quality and prevention of spoilage. Elevated MC in dried products enables the growth of both microorganisms associated with spoilage and insects that damage stored commodities (Fontana, 2007; Murdock et al., 2012; Roberts, 1972). In addition, sufficient drying prevents the growth of fungi that produce mycotoxins (e.g., aflatoxin) in stored commodities, particularly maize (Zea mays L.) and peanuts or groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) (Wu, 2014; Wu et al., 2014). Thus, the ability to measure and therefore manage MC of seeds and dry commodities is critical to maintaining their postharvest quality.
Seeds and commodities are hygroscopic, and their MC will change in response to the relative humidity (RH) of the air to which they are exposed. The MC of a commodity at a given RH decreases as the temperature or the oil content of the commodity increases. Thus, while the MC of commodities will differ at a given RH and temperature due primarily to differences in oil content (Cromarty et al., 1982), MC and equilibrium RH are related uniquely for a given commodity at a constant temperature, a relationship known as an isotherm (Fig. 1). The growth of both fungal and insect storage pests is prevented at RH percentages less than 70% (fungi) or 35% (insects) (Bewley et al., 2013; Roberts, 1972). Thus, the adequacy of storage conditions to prevent losses of quality and mycotoxin accumulation can be characterized by their RH or water activity (aw = RH/100) (Roberts and Ellis, 1989).
In developed countries, seeds and dry commodities are generally sold on a fresh or wet weight basis, and thus their MC are normally measured and corrected to a common MC for payment (12% for grains, for example). This is routinely done using moisture meters that measure the electrical capacitance of a given volume of grain, which have been calibrated against standard oven tests based on weight loss on heating (Grabe, 1989). However, small farmers in developing countries seldom have access to electronic moisture meters or even accurate scales and ovens to measure MC. Experienced farmers can judge grain MC approximately, but a simple and inexpensive method to measure MC would enable them to better monitor crop maturation, drying, and storage. It would also support the introduction of drying systems that could preserve product quality and reduce postharvest loss, particularly in humid tropical climates in which up to one-third of crop productivity is lost between the farm and the consumer due to moist storage conditions (Gustavsson et al., 2011; Kunusoth et al., 2012; Lipinski et al., 2013). Simple and nondestructive methods to estimate MC from RH have been described (Probert et al., 2003; Sutcliffe and Adams, 2014). We expand on that approach here to enable more widespread use of a RH-based method for measuring seed and commodity MC and encouraging adoption of improved postharvest storage conditions.
Using Relative Humidity Indicator Paper to Measure Seed and Commodity Moisture Contents - Image 1
Fig. 1. Relative humidity (RH) versus moisture content (MC) isotherms at 30°C for maize (Zea mays L.) grain and peanut (groundnut; Arachis hypogaea) kernels. The oil content of maize grain is about 5%, whereas that of peanuts is 47%, resulting in their different relationships between RH and MC. Once the RH, temperature and oil content of a commodity are known, the complete isotherm can be predicted with good accuracy between approximately 20 and 70% RH (Cromarty et al., 1982).
Procedures
Once an isotherm (RH/MC relationship) is known fora commodity (Fig. 1), it is only necessary to measure the RH of air in equilibrium with the commodity to estimate MC (Probert et al., 2003). Electronic temperature and RH meters are now widely available and relatively inexpensive (as little as US$3.00) (Fig. 2A). Various indirect indicators of RH are also available and have been described for use with seeds (Sutcliffe and Adams, 2014). In particular, humidity indicator strips (e.g., Humidicator paper [Micro Essential Laboratory; www.microessentiallab.com]) that change color in response to RH similar to pH paper are particularly inexpensive and convenient (Fig. 2B). For a few cents apiece, a small strip of such paper can quickly indicate the RH inside a container containing a seed or commodity sample (Fig. 2C). Thus, all that is required to estimate seed or commodity MC is to insert an indicator strip several centimeters into the bulk commodity or enclose an indicator strip with a subsample inside a waterproof container (e.g., a clean, dry plastic water bottle), allow it to equilibrate (generally within 30 min), and compare the color to the chart. For larger volumes, representative sampling is important, so taking multiple subsamples and enclosing them in a container with the indicator strip may give the best estimate of average MC.
Using Relative Humidity Indicator Paper to Measure Seed and Commodity Moisture Contents - Image 2
Fig. 2. Methods of measuring relative humidity (RH). (A) Electronic temperature and RH meters are now quite inexpensive and readily available and provide accurate RH values within their specified range of detection. (B) Humidicator RH indicator paper (www. microessentiallab.com) changes color in response to RH and provides a visual report of the RH of the air to which the paper strip is exposed. (C) A dry RH indicator strip was enclosed in a sealed container with moist seeds (left) and within 5 min had changed to pink (right). This simple assay enables measurement of RH (and conversion to moisture content) of any commodity and requires only a container (or plastic bag) and RH indicator paper.
We prepared a spreadsheet that can convert RH values to MC values for many seeds/grains (Fig. 3; Supplemental Material, also available at www.dryingbeads.org/tools) based on the equation developed by Cromarty et al. (1982) that predicts the relationship between aw and seed MC based on the temperature and seed oil content:
Using Relative Humidity Indicator Paper to Measure Seed and Commodity Moisture Contents - Image 3
where Me is the equilibrium MC (dry weight basis), D0 is the seed oil content (fraction of dry weight), and T is the temperature (°C). The equation is quite accurate between approximately 20 and 70% RH, also the most sensitive range for the Humidicator strips. The spreadsheet allows entry of the temperature to adjust for temperature effects on the isotherms. Any product not listed in the spreadsheet could be calibrated for use with the indicator paper by equilibrating samples at a range of known MC values (determined by an oven test) and observing the corresponding indicator strip color when incubated with each sample.
Fig. 3. Partial views of a spreadsheet developed to convert relative humidity (RH) values to moisture content (MC) (fresh weight or dry weight basis) for many commodities (Supplemental Material, also available at www.dryingbeads.org/tools). The first MC column can be specified by the user for a specific crop and RH; the value is shown as the circle on the isotherm on the right. The remaining columns correspond to the colors of the RH indicator strips. The relative suitability of different RH percentages for seed storage is also indicated on the isotherm. For shorter-term storage of commodities, the lowest range should be avoided due to the potential for mechanical damage of dry seeds (e.g., beans) or unsuitability for subsequent processing (e.g., milling).
Note that the Humidicator indicator paper contains cobalt chloride, which can present a health hazard if significant quantities are inhaled or ingested. We believe that the risk is very small for the intended use, as exposure by contact would be low due to the small size of the strip used. But for maximum safety, food samples that have been in contact with the strips should be discarded. Contact could also be avoided by placing the strips inside of a porous container (e.g., a plastic tube with holes for air movement or a cloth or mesh bag) when used with foods.
Results and Discussion
Particularly in humid climates, proper storage of seeds and commodities requires initial drying to safe MC and the use of waterproof packaging to prevent rehydration from the atmosphere. The use of RH meters or indicator strips makes it convenient to determine whether the commodity has been sufficiently dried and to monitor the RH inside moisture-proof packaging (e.g., Fig. 2C). For simply monitoring storage suitability, no conversion of RH to MC is necessary, as the color of the indicator paper (RH) can be related directly to the potential storability of the commodity (Fig. 3). Although the color scale can distinguish only differences of 10 to 20% in RH, this is sufficient to estimate grain MC to within approximately 1% in the range from 40 to 60% RH (Fig. 3). At the extremes (<20% or >80% RH), the conditions are clearly very good or very poor for storage, so precision in conversion to MC is less important in those RH regions. We have incubated the strips over a series of saturated salt solutions creating specific RHs, and the colors of the strips accurately reflect those known values. If greater accuracy is desired, electronic RH meters can be used, and the exact values can be entered into the spreadsheet for conversion to MC.
There are numerous additional applications for this inexpensive and readily available method for estimating commodity MC. For example, harvest times are generally determined by grain MC, but this is often based on experience, visual appearance, or texture (e.g., by biting). Enclosing a small sample of grain in a container with an indicator strip would give a more accurate estimate of MC and therefore of maturity. Easy measurement of MC will make traditional air- or sun-drying of commodities more effective by knowing when maximum drying in a given environment has been achieved. The ability to convert the indicator readings to MC would allow calculation of a standard MC for a given commodity for sales by weight. It could also enable a premium to be paid for dry commodities to compensate the grower for the weight loss, as such incentives are needed to make adoption of on-farm drying systems economical for the grower (Ann, 1996). In addition, drying to low MC and storage in waterproof containers enables community seed banks and breeding organizations to store seeds and germplasm for long periods (up to years) without refrigeration, resulting in low energy use and independence from unreliable power supplies (Dadlani et al., 2016; IIVR, 2016). Electronic RH meters and particularly RH indicator strips provide simple and inexpensive methods to monitor such storage conditions and assure maintenance of low MC conditions.
Supplemental Material
A Moisture Content Calculator, v. 1.2, is available online as a supplemental file (https://dl.sciencesocieties. org/publications/ael/tocs/1/1).
Acknowledgments
Research contributing to this paper was supported by the US Agency for International Development through the Horticulture Innovation Lab project 09-002945-50.
This article was originally published in Agricultural & Environmental Letters. 1:160018 (2016). doi:10.2134/ael2016.04.0018. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Ann, C.T. 1996. Lack of incentives as constraints to introduction of efficient drying systems. In: B.R. Champ, E. Highley, and G.I. Johnson, editors, Grain drying in Asia. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, Australia. p. 74–79, http://aciar.gov.au/ publication/pr071.

Bewley, J.D., K.J. Bradford, H.W.M. Hilhorst, and H. Nonogaki. 2013. Seeds: Physiology of development, germination, and dormancy. 3rd ed. Springer, New York. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4693-4

Cromarty, A.S., R.H. Ellis, and E.H. Roberts. 1982. The design of seed storage facilities for genetic conservation. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome.

Dadlani, M., P. Mathur, and A. Gupta. 2016. Community seed banks. Agric. World 2: 6–9. https://issuu.com/krishijagran/docs/ krishi_jagran_agriculture_world-jan.

Ellis, R.H. 1988. The viability equation, seed viability nomographs, and practical advice on seed storage. Seed Sci. Technol. 16:29–50.

Ellis, R.H., and E.H. Roberts. 1980. Improved equations for the prediction of seed longevity. Ann. Bot. 45:13–30.

Ellis, R.H., and E.H. Roberts. 1981. The quantification of aging and survival in orthodox seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 9:373–409.

Fontana, A. 2007. Minimum water activity limits for growth of microorganisms. In: G.V. Barbosa-Cánovas, A.J. Fontana, S.J. Schmidt, and T.P. Labuza, editors, Water activity in foods: Fundamentals and applications. Blackwell, Ames, IA. p. 405–406. doi:10.1002/9780470376454.app4

Grabe, D.F. 1989. Measurement of seed moisture. In: P.C. Stanwood and M.B. McDonald, editors, Seed moisture. CSSA Spec. Publ. 14. CSSA, Madison, WI. p. 69–92.

Gustavsson, J., C. Cederberg, U. Sonesson, R. Van Otterdijk, and A. Meybeck. 2011. Global food losses and food waste. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. www.fao.org/docrep/014/ mb060e/mb060e00.pdf.

Harrington, J.F. 1972. Seed storage and longevity. In: T.T. Kozlowski, editor, Seed biology. Vol. 3. Insects, and seed collection, storage, testing, and certification. Academic Press, New York. p. 145–245. doi:10.1016/ B978-0-12-395605-7.50009-0

IIVR. 2016. First low-energy seed gene bank inaugurated at ICAR-IIVR, Varanasi. Indian Institute of Vegetable Research-Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. www.iivr.org. in/first-low-energy-seed-gene-bank-inaugurated-icar-iivr-varanasi. html.

Kunusoth, K., P. Dahal, J.V. Van Asbrouck, and K.J. Bradford. 2012. New technology for postharvest drying and storage of seeds. Seed Times (New Delhi) 5:33–38.

Lipinski, B., C. Hanson, J. Lomax, L. Kitinoja, R. Waite, and T. Searchinger. 2013. Reducing food loss and waste. Working Paper, Installment 2 of Creating a Sustainable Food Future. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. www.worldresourcesreport.org.

Murdock, L.L., V. Margam, I. Baoua, S. Balfe, and R.E. Shade. 2012. Death by desiccation: Effects of hermetic storage on cowpea bruchids. J. Stored Prod. Res. 49:166–170. doi:10.1016/j.jspr.2012.01.002

Probert, R.J., K.R. Manger, and J. Adams. 2003. Non-destructive measurement of seed moisture. In: R.D. Smith, J.B. Dickie, S.H. Linington, H.W. Pritchard, and R.J. Probert, editors, Seed conservation: Turning science into practice. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK. p. 367–387.

Roberts, E.H. 1972. Storage environment and the control of viability. In: E.H. Roberts, editor, Viability of seeds. Chapman and Hall, Syracuse, NY. p. 14–58. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5685-8_2

Roberts, E.H., and R.H. Ellis. 1989. Water and seed survival. Ann. Bot. 63:39–52.

Sutcliffe, V., and J. Adams. 2014. Low-cost monitors of seed moisture status. Technical Information Sheet 07. Royal Botanic Garden, Kew Wakehurst, UK. http://www.kew.org/sites/default/files/07-Low-cost%20moisture% 20monitors%20web.pdf .

Wu, F. 2014. Time to face the fungal threat. Nature 516:S7. doi:10.1038/516S7a Wu, F., J.D. Groopman, and J.J. Pestka. 2014. Public health impacts of foodborne mycotoxins. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 5:351–372. doi:10.1146/annurev-food-030713-092431

Related topics
Authors:
Peetambar Dahal
UC Davis - University of California
Recommend
Comment
Share
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.