Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

Aspergillus population diversity and its role in aflatoxin contamination of cashew nuts from coastal Kenya

Published: July 2, 2024
By: Colletah Rhoda Musangi 1,2; Bicko Steve Juma 2; Dennis Wamalabe Mukhebi 1,2; Everlyne Moraa Isoe 1; Cromwell Mwiti Kibiti 3; Wilton Mwema Mbinda 1,2 / 1 Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Pwani University, Kilifi, Kenya; 2 Pwani University Bioscience Research Centre (PUBReC), Pwani University, Kilifi, Kenya; 3 Department of Pure and Applied Sciences, Technical University of Mombasa, Mombasa, Kenya.
Summary

Cashew nuts are among the main cash crops in coastal Kenya, due in large part to their high nutritional value. Unfortunately, they also make them highly susceptible to mold contamination, resulting in biodeterioration of the nutritional value and potential contamination with toxic secondary metabolites, such as aflatoxins, that cause them to be rejected for sale at the market. We determined the population diversity of the Aspergillus species and their role in aflatoxin contamination in cashew nuts in selected coastal regions of Kenya. Fifty raw cashew nut samples were collected from post-harvest storage facilities across three counties in Kenya’s coastal region and examined for moisture content and the presence of Aspergillus fungi. About 63 presumptive isolates were recovered from the cashew nuts. ITS and 28S rDNA regions were sequenced. The aflD, aflM and aflR genes were amplified to identify the potentially aflatoxigenic from the Aspergillus isolates. The Aflatoxins’ presence on the isolates was screened using UV and the ammonia vapour test on coconut milk agar and validated using ELISA assay. A comparison of cashew moisture content between the three counties sampled revealed a significant difference. Sixty-three isolates were recovered and identified to section based on morphological characters and their respective ITS regions were used to obtain species identifications. Three sections from the genus were represented, Flavi and Nigri, and Terrei with isolates from the section Nigri having slightly greater abundance (n = 35). The aflD, aflM and aflR genes were amplified for all isolates to assess the presence of the aflatoxin biosynthesis pathway, indicating the potential for aflatoxin production. Less than half of the Aspergillus isolates (39.68%) contained the aflatoxin pathway genes, while 22.22% isolates were aflatoxigenic, which included only the section Flavi isolates. Section Flavi isolates identification was confirmed by calmodulin gene. The presence of species from Aspergillus section Flavi and section Nigri indicate the potential for aflatoxin or ochratoxin in the cashew nuts. The study established a foundation for future investigations of the fungi and mycotoxins contaminating cashew nuts in Kenya, which necessitates developing strategies to prevent infection by mycotoxigenic fungi, especially during the storage and processing phases.

Introduction

Cashew trees (Anacardium occidentale) are among the main cash crops in Coastal Kenya. They are grown by small-holder farmers in Kilifi, Kwale, Mombasa, Tana River and Lamu counties for their nuts [1]. Processed cashew nuts and cashew nut products are among the most widely traded nut goods globally and their demand is rising rapidly [2]. Despite, the increasing global demand, cashew nut production in Kenya has suffered numerous constraints which are linked to the agronomic, processing, and marketing, thereby affecting the quality and quantity of the harvested nuts [2]. Due to high post-harvest prevalence of pests and other diseases, yield losses have been increasingly experienced. Additionally, a dramatic decline in cashew nut marketability has occurred due to mycotoxin contamination which renders them unsafe for consumption and sale [3].
Cashew nuts are vulnerable to fungal infestation due to high levels of protein, minerals, and fats [4]. Infection commonly occurs due to poor handling and storage of the harvested nuts [5] although it can happen at other stages such as pre-harvest (while still on the trees) or during harvest [6]. When the seeds are not properly dried before storage to moisture content of < 8% is considered safe for raw cashew nuts, they facilitate fungal growth and infestation [3]. Additionally, storage conditions involving high humidity and temperatures encourage fungal growth in cashew nuts and possible mycotoxin contamination [7]. The mycotoxigenic fungi may produce a multitude of mycotoxins such as aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, fumonisins, patulin, and trichothecene T-2 and HT-2 toxins [8]. Of these, aflatoxins (AFs) are the most important due to their carcinogenic and genotoxic effects [9]. Aflatoxins are produced by species within Aspergillus section Flavi, including A. flavus, A. parasiticus, A. nomius and Aspergillus species that produce the small sclerotia. These fungi are often implicated as causal agents of aflatoxin contamination of crops and food in Africa, and globally [10]. Taking proper precautions during collection and post-harvest handling of cashew nuts could substantially reduce the risk of infestation by mycotoxigenic fungi [11]. Aflatoxigenic fungi can grow well even at warm temperatures between 35 to 40˚C; however, the optimal production of aflatoxins has been recorded between 28 and 31˚C [12, 13]. Additionally, humidity above 85% favors their growth especially in storage facilities, encouraging aflatoxin production [14]. Aflatoxin contamination of cashew nuts and other food crops is major problem in Africa, especially in the coastal agro-ecological regions, because the climatic conditions are suitable for the growth of fungi and the synthesis of the toxins [15]. In the tropical and subtropical areas of the world, aflatoxin contamination has been reported in milk, spices, maize, rice, peanuts, tree nuts including almonds, Brazil nuts and cashew nuts [16–18].
Aspergilli are filamentous fungi that thrive as saprophytes and are found on variety of substrates and environments [19]. The genus is subdivided into 22 sections, half of which are clinically relevant species [20]. Aspergillus section Flavi is comprised of both aflatoxigenic and nonaflatoxigenic species [21]. Although the numbers of recognized aflatoxigenic species is expanding, A. flavus, A. parasiticus and A. nomius are the most widely recognized aflatoxin producers [22, 23]. Moreover, in section Flavi, A. arachdicola, A. pseudotamarii, A. bombycis, A. toxicarius (A. parasiticus), A. aflatoxiformans (formerly A. parvisclerotigenus) and A. minisclerotigenes have been documented as aflatoxin producers [24, 25]. Their morphological and molecular characterizations have been conducted in association with maize [26], rice [27], cassava, millet and sorghum [28], ground nuts and tree nuts [29, 30], peanuts [25] and wheat [31]. Previous findings involving their presence in cashew nuts have also been reported by [32] and [6] although the quantification levels were ascertained in both studies. However, no studies have been conducted to characterize the aflatoxin-producing fungi in cashew nuts from the Kenyan. Aflatoxin contamination in maize is endemic in Kenya. For instance, in April 2004, one of the largest aflatoxicosis outbreaks occurred, resulting in 317 cases and 125 deaths [33]. Aflatoxinproducers are not to be host specific and species detected in maize could infect cashews nuts with high levels of aflatoxins [34]. In this study, we report that cashew nuts from coastal Kenya were infested by Aspergillus species that to produce aflatoxins and may have the potential to secrete of other mycotoxins, necessitating vigilance and continued research in mycotoxigenic fungi for guaranteeing consumer health and enhancing livelihoods and economics related to cashew nuts.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

Cashew nut samples were collected from storage containers in the Kilifi, Kwale and Lamu counties along the coastal region of Kenya using a stratified random sampling method as described by [35]. The cashew nut producers were divided into small areas (strata) according to their geographic locations in each county. From each location, at least three samples were collected and thoroughly mixed for a combined weight of 1 kg. A total of 19, 21, and 10 samples were collected from Kwale, Kilifi, and Lamu counties, respectively. The kernels were then wrapped in labelled Ziplock bags, sealed and transported to Pwani University Biosciences Research Centre (PUBReC), Pwani University, Kilifi, Kenya for downstream analysis. Upon arrival, each sample was divided into two equal halves; one half was stored at 4˚C and the other half was stored at room temperature.

Moisture content evaluation

Moisture content was determined using the oven drying method as described by [36] with some modifications. Cashew nut samples with shell were measured for 100 g from each sample and placed in a glass Petri dish of known weight (W0) and the initial weight (W1) of each sample was determined. The Petri dishes were then heated to 105˚C in the oven for drying overnight. Drying of the cashew nuts continued with hourly weight measurements until the reading of each sample was constant indicating all the moisture had been completely removed. The dry weight (W2) was used to calculate the moisture content according to the formula:
Moisture content evaluation
The percentage of moisture content was calculated for all 50 samples, which were then grouped according to their sampling areas to calculate the means of each county separately.

Fungal isolation

Cashew nuts were direct plated to recover isolates of Aspergillus species as described by [37]. Whole cashew nuts were surface sterilized by immersion in 70% ethanol followed by three rinses with sterile distilled water. The excess sterile distilled water was removed by squeezing the kernels between sterile filter paper. Sterilized cashew shells were then cut in four directions using a sterile scalpel to help remove the outer shell and expose the cashew kernel within. The kernels were then cut into several pieces of approximately the same size (3 mm x 4 mm) using a sterile scalpel. The particles were directly placed on modified Rose Bengal Agar (MRBA) medium [38] in 60 mm × 15 mm Petri dishes, with three pieces per plate, and a technical replication and incubated at 30˚C for 7 days in darkness. The number of infected particles we counted and expressed as a percentage of the total number of kernel pieces that were plated. Fungi growing on the kernels were transferred to Water Agar (WA) medium and incubated for 3 days at 27˚C in the light for mono-conidiation. The resulting hyphae were viewed in the light, and further cultured on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) and Malt Extract Agar media (MEA) at 25˚C for 7 days in the light to isolate pure cultures. The percentage growth rate of the aspergillus isolates growth were subjected to anomality test using qqplot of normality test in R package. The percentage growth rate of the Aspergilli isolates was then compared to the moisture content to determine whether their correlation is positive or negative.

Morphological characterization of Aspergillus isolates

Examination of macro-morphological characters was based on the mycelium growth pattern, the presence of conidia, sclerotia and hyphae pigmentation. All the macroscopic and microscopic features were compared to the synoptic keys of identification of the fungi isolated as described by [39]. Colony color allowed for rapid grouping of isolates based on section, whereby the brown and black colonies belonged to Aspergillus section Nigri and the greenish colonies belonged to section Flavi. To examine micro-morphological characters, vegetative tissue from each 7-day old culture was mounted on a glass slide and stained with lactophenol cotton blue for micro-morphological examination using light microscopy at 40X and 100X magnifications. Slides were examined on a Zeiss Primo Star dissecting light microscope mounted with the ZEISS Axiocam ERc 5s Microscope Camera 5mp. Slides exhibiting good micro-morphological characters were made into permanent slides for future reference. The isolates were characterized based on size, shape and ornamentation of microscopic structures such as conidiophore stipes, vesicles and conidia.
The colonies were grouped according to their distinct colors and the members of the different sections, species and strains were confirmed using the microscopic features. These included the seriation; either biseriate, uniseriate or biseriate and uniseriate, conidial head shape; either columnar or globose, and the diameter and shape of the vesicle. Other micromorphological features used to distinguish the species were the conidiophore shape towards the vesicle, the conidia head size and the arrangement of the phialides into the metulae. The occurrence of each species was then expressed in percentage of the species compared to the total number of isolates using the formula:
Occurance of species

Molecular confirmation of species

Genomic DNA (gDNA) from 63 pure isolates cultured in PDA medium was extracted from fresh scraped culture using a sterile scalpel blade. The scraped tissues were crushed in liquid nitrogen to fine powder. The gDNA was extracted using Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini according to the manufacturer’s described protocol. The extracted gDNA was then used for PCR amplification using gene/domain specific primers (Supporting information 1 in S1 File). The internal transcribed spacer region (ITS1/4 primers), as well as the D1/D2 domains of the nuclear (NL) region of the 28S rDNA large subunit (NL1/4 primers) were used to confirm the morphological identifications of our Aspergillus isolates [40]. Both regions were also used for diversity estimation studies following the protocol of [40]. The presence of the aflatoxin biosynthesis pathway was determined in all the isolates using primers specific for three pathway genes (nor1/aflD, ver-1/aflM and aflR) based on a previous study that suggested these genes could be used to discern between aflatoxigenic and non-aflatoxigenic Aspergilli [41]. The PCR products of the ITS and 28S rDNA amplicons for all 63 isolates were sequenced using Sanger sequencing technology. The ab1 files for each region/domain were analyzed separately. The nucleotide sequences were then queried using the BLASTn tool from the NCBI database to identify the fungi related to the sequences. The 21 isolates identified as Aspergillus section Flavi from the BLASTn analysis of the 63 isolates were further confirmed by sequencing of calmodulin gene (Cmd5/6 primers) [40] (Supporting information 1 in S1 File). The phylogenetic relatedness of the Aspergillus isolates was inferred using the maximum likelihood approach. Newick trees were generated using the Fasttree package (https://help.rc.ufl.edu/doc/FastTree). A bootstrap replication of 1000 was used. The trees were annotated using the ggtree package in R package.

Screening of isolates for aflatoxin presence

Pure isolates obtained from PDA/MEA media were screened for their aflatoxigenicity on coconut milk agar (CMA) medium [42]. Each isolate was inoculated in freshly prepared CMA and incubated at 28˚C for 7 days. Further, the isolates were exposed to UV light to identify those that had produced aflatoxins. Isolates that absorbed and emitted very bright, bright, or weak UV fluorescence at 365 nm were considered to be capable of producing aflatoxins [26]. After incubation, the Petri plates were turned upside down and 2 mL of concentrated ammonia solution was poured into the lid of inverted culture plate and kept for 10–15 minutes to release ammonia vapour. On exposure of culture to ammonia vapour the color development was recorded. Any color change from yellow to dark yellow, pink, or reddish brown was considered as an indicator of positive aflatoxin production [43]. Isolates that were aflatoxigenic were validated for total aflatoxins using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using the 96 well Thermo Fisher ELISA kit. All the samples tested positive, and the intensity of the yellow color was measured by microplate reader at 450 nm. The results were calculated as:
Screening of isolates for aflatoxin presence
And the concentrations of individual samples interpolated from the calibration curve generated from the AF-B1 standards.

Data analysis

The mean moisture content was calculated for all the 13 locations, followed by comparison for differences within the agroecological regions and among the selected counties of the Kenyan coast. For the statistical significance test, a normalcy test was carried out using Shapiro wilk test that showed a normal distribution (p> 0.05) of the data. The moisture content means of Kilifi and Kwale county were analyzed using one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) followed by HSD test, while Lamu data were analyzed using the two tailed un-paired student t- test at p< 0.05 in R software (v4.2.1). The comparison of the moisture content means among the Kilifi, Lamu and Kwale regions was done using the Kruskall-Wallis test (p < 0.05), followed by a post- hoc test at a p< 0.05. Diversity distance estimations of the Aspergillus isolates sequences were determined newick Tree was generated using the Fasttree package (https://help.rc.ufl.edu/doc/ FastTree). The tree was annotated using the ggtree package in R [44]. The haplotype diversity estimation within and among the three counties and analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) were determined using Arlequin version 3.5 [45].

Results

Moisture content evaluation

Comparing the three counties, cashew nuts collected from Kwale, Lamu and Kilifi showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in moisture content (Fig 1A). Lamu County had the lowest moisture content (4.73 ± 1.50%), while Kwale County had the highest moisture content (7.15 ± 0.25%) (Fig 1A; Supporting information 2 in S1 File). A significant difference in moisture content was found between Kilifi and Kwale (p = 0.00113) and between Kwale and Lamu (p = 0.00556) (Fig 2). However, there was no significant difference in moisture content of the cashew nuts from Lamu and Kilifi counties (p = 0.981) (Fig 1A). The mean moisture for the cashew nuts collected from the three counties was 5.71 ± 0.81% (Supporting information 2 in S1 File). Assessing differences in moisture content within each county (across sampling locations), the moisture content from the seven locations across Kilifi County did not have significant differences (Fig 1B). The lowest moisture content mean was recorded for cashew nuts collected from Kaloleni (2.61 ± 1.74%), while the highest moisture content mean was recorded in cashew nuts collected from Kilifi North (7.06 ± 1.77%) (Fig 2; Supporting information 2 in S1 File). The average moisture content of the cashew nuts from Kilifi County was 4.87 ± 0.99% (Supporting information 2 in S1 File). Comparison of moisture content means across the four sampling locations within Kwale County also revealed no significant differences (Fig 1C) with the least moisture content mean recorded for cashew nuts from Msambweni (6.68 ±0.63%) while the highest mean was recorded in cashew nuts from Matuga (8.096 ±0.53%) (Fig 1C, Supporting information 2 in S1 File). The overall moisture content mean of the cashew nuts from Kwale County was 7.15 ± 0.25% (Supporting information 2 in S1 File). The moisture content means in the cashew nuts collected from the two sampling locations (Lamu East and Lamu West) of Lamu County revealed no significant difference (Fig 1D). Cashew nuts from Lamu East had a lower moisture content mean of 4.41 ±0.38% compared to those from Lamu West which recorded moisture content mean of 5.05 ±0.22% (Supporting information 2 in S1 File). The overall mean of the moisture of the cashew nuts from Lamu County was 4.73 ±1.49% (Supporting information 2 in S1 File). Results of the mean moisture content of the 50 cashew nut samples collected from all 13 locations showed significant differences between some but not all locations (Fig 2). Pair-wise comparison of the mean moisture content from the sampling locations shows no significant difference at (p< 0.05) from the 74 of the 78 location pairings, however, there was significant difference observed in only 4 of the 78 location pairings (p = 0.0019) as demonstrated in the sampling locations of Matuga (Kwale) and Kaloleni (Kilifi) p = 0.00564, and Matuga (Kwale) and Kilifi South (Kilifi) p = 0.0317 (Fig 2).

Morphological characterization of Aspergillus isolates

Different Aspergillus species were isolated from MRBA selective medium resulting to 63 distinct isolates (Supporting information 3 in S1 File) which were cultured onto each of two media (PDA and MEA) for morphological characterizations. We observed distinct mycelial pigmentations such as white, yellow, black, and green on PDA (Supporting information 4 in S1 File) and on MEA (Supporting information 5 in S1 File). Based on colony colors, it was possible to group the isolates into one of two possible sections, Flavi (greens and yellows) and Nigri (browns and blacks). Macro-morphological characters allowed us to putatively identify isolates to species which included A. parasiticus, A. flavus and A. oryzae from section Flavi, and A. niger and A. tubingensis from section Nigri. We then examined micro-morphological characters to further improve our species identifications with 100X magnification facilitating better differentiation of conidiophore structures and conidium characters (Supporting information 6 in S1 File).
Fig 1. Box plots comparing the average moisture content of cashew nuts between (A) and within (B, C and D) each of the three sampling counties. Betweencounty values compared using the Kruskal Wallis test, followed by the Post Hoc test (p < 0.05). Within-county values compared using a one-way ANOVA, while Lamu County values were compared sing T-test (p < 0.05).
Occurrence of the species per county showed that A. oryzae was not recovered from both Kwale and Kilifi counties while only one (100.00%) isolate of A. oryzae was recovered in Lamu County (Table 1). The highest proportion of all species recovered in each county was A. parasiticus in both Kilifi (45.45% of the total isolates) and Lamu (36.36% of the total isolates). A. niger was most prevalent in Kwale with 41.38% of the total isolates (Table 1). The moisture content of the cashew nuts had a positive correlation (R2 = 0.21) with the growth of the Aspergillus isolates obtained from the PDA media. The cashew nuts with lower moisture content showed slower growth rate of the isolates while the ones with higher moisture content showed faster growth rate of the fungi (Fig 3).

Molecular confirmation of species identification

PCR amplification of the ITS (Supporting information 7 in S1 File) and 28S rDNA regions (Supporting information 8 in S1 File) for our 63 Aspergillus isolates resulted in fragments with band sizes of 598 bp and 650 bp, respectively. Sequenced amplicons queried on BLASTn tool in NCBI confirmed the identity of the putative isolates. Confirmed identifications revealed that the most abundant species were from section Nigri and included A. niger, A. tubingensis, A. costaricaensis, and A. luchuensis (Table 2). Species from section Flavi included A. flavus, A. novoparasiticus, A. aculeatus, and from section Terrei, species A. terreus was identified. Six of the isolates shared sequence identity with unidentified Aspergillus species (accessioned as “Aspergillus sp.”) (Table 2). The calmodulin gene was used to authenticate the 21 isolates from section Flavi identified through ITS and 28S rDNA. The results confirmed that all the isolates were from section Flavi (Figs 4 and 5). The calmodulin gene identified two sections; Flavi and Nigri with only two species: A. flavus and A. aculeatus, respectively, in contrast to the ITS and 28S rDNA results which revealed the presence of the two as well as A. novoparasiticus (Table 2). Klf07, Klf14, Klf16, Klf22, Lmu35, Lmu38, Kwl45 and Kwl50 which were identified as A. flavus, A. aculeatus, A. aculeatus, A. novoparasiticus, Aspergillus sp., A. flavus, A. flavus and Aspergillus sp. using ITS and 28S rDNA primers were classified as A. aculeatus, A. flavus, A. flavus, A. flavus, A. flavus, A. aculeatus, A. flavus, and A. flavus respectively via the calmodulin gene specific primers (Fig 5). Amplicons of the three genes of the aflatoxin biosynthesis pathway (aflM, aflR and aflD) resulted in band sizes of 536 bp, 500 bp and 400 bp, respectively (Supporting information 9, 10 in S1 File). The examination of the 63 Aspergillus isolates for the presence of any of three genes revealed that 5% (n = 3) contained aflR gene, 7% (n = 4) contained aflD gene, and 15.87% (n = 10) contained aflM gene (Supporting information 11 in S1 File). Twenty two percent (n = 14) of the isolates had at all the three the investigated genes, classifying the isolates as potentially aflatoxigenic. All the genes that amplified were confirmed to be from the section Flavi using ITS and 28S rDNA gene amplifications. Lamu County recorded the lowest number of Aspergillus isolates (3) that had at least one of the cluster genes while the highest number (8) was found in Kilifi County (Fig 6).
Fig 2. Box plots comparing the average moisture content of cashew nuts from each of the 13 sampling locations. The means were assessed for statistically significant differences by one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05), yielding a test statistic of (F) = 3.423 and p-value of p = 0.002. To confirm the significantly different pairs, the Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test was performed. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, no asterisk indicates lack of significance.
Fig 2. Box plots comparing the average moisture content of cashew nuts from each of the 13 sampling locations. The means were assessed for statistically significant differences by one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05), yielding a test statistic of (F) = 3.423 and p-value of p = 0.002. To confirm the significantly different pairs, the Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test was performed. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, no asterisk indicates lack of significance.
Table 1. Occurrence of Aspergillus species from each sampling county based on morphological identification.
Table 1. Occurrence of Aspergillus species from each sampling county based on morphological identification.
Fig 3. Graph showing the correlation between cashew kernel moisture content with growth rates of Aspergillus isolates. Data was evaluated using the Pearson correlation method and resulted in r = 0.4582 at 95% confidence interval, R square = 0.2100, p-value = 0.0001. The correlation was Significant at (alpha = 0.05) for the number of XY Pairs = 65. The growth rates were measured in mm/day
Fig 3. Graph showing the correlation between cashew kernel moisture content with growth rates of Aspergillus isolates. Data was evaluated using the Pearson correlation method and resulted in r = 0.4582 at 95% confidence interval, R square = 0.2100, p-value = 0.0001. The correlation was Significant at (alpha = 0.05) for the number of XY Pairs = 65. The growth rates were measured in mm/day

Screening of aflatoxin presence in Aspergillus species isolates

The 25 of the 63 isolates that had the at least one of the three aflatoxin pathway genes were screened for aflatoxin production in coconut milk agar. In the UV at 365nm, the positive isolates fluoresced either green or blue (Supporting information 12 in S1 File). In the Ammonia test the AFs producing isolates changed colors from their original green mycelial pigmentation to yellow or dark yellow, pink, or reddish-brown (Supporting information 12 in S1 File). Of all the potential aflatoxin-producing species identified by amplification of the AFs pathway genes only 14 showed the presence of aflatoxins. The 14 isolates also showed presence of total aflatoxins in the ELISA assay (Supporting information 11, 13 in S1 File). The total aflatoxin absorbances (B/B0) ranged from 101.355 as the highest and the lowest being 71.023 (Supporting information 13 in S1 File).
Table 2. Molecular confirmation of Aspergillus isolates, based on BLAST query of the ITS and 28s rDNA sequences, along with their GenBank accession numbers.
Table 2. Molecular confirmation of Aspergillus isolates, based on BLAST query of the ITS and 28s rDNA sequences, along with their GenBank accession numbers.

Diversity estimation of the Aspergillus isolates

Because one sequence had low quality, 62 28S rDNA and 63 ITS sequences were used to infer separate phylogenetic trees and determine the evolutionary relationships of the isolates. Sequences identified in section Flavi with > 98% sequence similarity clustered together as one clade while the sequences of the section Nigri and having > 98% sequence identity formed two clades (Fig 4). AMOVA results of the genetic variance across the Kilifi, Kwale and Lamu populations demonstrated that there were no significant differences in the genetic makeup both the 28S rDNA region (Table 3) and the ITS region (Table 4) among and within the three populations. The percentage of variation among the three populations was 0.71% and 0.85%, while percentage of variation within the populations was 99.29% and 99.15%, for the 28S rDNA and ITS regions, respectively. The fixation indices (FST) for each respective region were 0.00715 and 0.00852, showing that that there was little genetic differentiation between the populations.
Fig 4. Phylogeny of Aspergillus isolates recovered from cashew nuts using nucleotide sequences from A. 28S rDNA region. The phylogeny was inferred using maximum likelihood method of newick tree generated using the Fasttree package. A bootstrap replication of 1000 was used.
Fig 4. Phylogeny of Aspergillus isolates recovered from cashew nuts using nucleotide sequences from A. 28S rDNA region. The phylogeny was inferred using maximum likelihood method of newick tree generated using the Fasttree package. A bootstrap replication of 1000 was used.
Fig 5. Phylogeny of Aspergillus isolates recovered from cashew nuts using nucleotide sequences from ITS region. The phylogeny was inferred using maximum likelihood method of newick tree generated using the Fasttree package. A bootstrap replication of 1000 was used.
Fig 5. Phylogeny of Aspergillus isolates recovered from cashew nuts using nucleotide sequences from ITS region. The phylogeny was inferred using maximum likelihood method of newick tree generated using the Fasttree package. A bootstrap replication of 1000 was used.
Fig 6. Phylogenetic tree of Aspergillus species section Flavi confirmed by use of calmodulin gene. The tree shows Aspergillus isolates previously detected by ITS and 28S rDNA regions. The phylogeny was inferred using maximum likelihood method of newick tree generated using the Fasttree package. A bootstrap replication of 1000 was used
Fig 6. Phylogenetic tree of Aspergillus species section Flavi confirmed by use of calmodulin gene. The tree shows Aspergillus isolates previously detected by ITS and 28S rDNA regions. The phylogeny was inferred using maximum likelihood method of newick tree generated using the Fasttree package. A bootstrap replication of 1000 was used
Table 3. The genetic variance of the Aspergillus isolates using the 28S rDNA.
Table 3. The genetic variance of the Aspergillus isolates using the 28S rDNA.
Table 4. The genetic variance of the Aspergillus isolates using the ITS region.
Table 4. The genetic variance of the Aspergillus isolates using the ITS region.

Discussion

Moisture content is one of the most crucial quality factors for raw cashew nuts. In this study, the Aspergillus isolates were recovered from raw cashew nut kernels to evaluate their fungal contamination levels. [46] reported that temperature and moisture content are important factors that affect fungal growth rate and diversity in foodstuffs. Cashew nuts were first evaluated for moisture content and was correlated with growth of Aspergillus fungi. The results from this established that the moisture content of our cashew samples was below 10% which is safe for the storage of cashew nuts to avoid fungi growth [11]. The low range of moisture content also may infer a good whole kernel quality, which decreases as the moisture content of the cashew nuts increases [47]. The moisture content and the growth relationship of the isolated Aspergillus species from the sampled cashew nuts had a positive correlation (R2 = 0.21), indicating that the fungal growth accelerated as the moisture content of the cashew nuts increased (Fig 4). Similar finding showing a positive correlation of moisture content and fungal growth rate has been reported in cashew nuts [6] and in rice [27].
The average moisture content of the cashew nuts in the three counties was significantly different. The moisture content of the cashew nuts from Kilifi and Lamu counties were lower than that of the cashew nuts from Kwale County. The differences observed could result from several variables prior to sampling such as the moisture content of the soil on which the nut falls, or the climatic conditions of the field and the length of time the nut remains on the soil before collection [48]. Locations experiencing very high temperatures have lower moisture content and those stored in open areas for long have higher moisture content than those stored in locked and air-proof bags [48]. High moisture content in cashew nuts provides a good environment for fungal growth which could also result in the production and release of their secondary metabolites [11]. The study recommends limiting the comparison of the moisture content to nuts of the same variety, such as large or small, and not a combination of varieties, which may have different moisture content levels because the size of the cashew nuts may influence their kernel moisture content levels.
It is a difficult exercise to accurately identify and differentiate some Aspergillus species from each other based solely on morphology [49, 50]. Morphologically, five species were identified A. niger, A. tubingensis, A. flavus, A. parasiticus and A. oryzae. In the study, isolates representing five species were identified using the ITS region, and four isolates could not be identified to species using this region. Surprisingly, the 28S rDNA region expanded species representatives to nine with only two isolates remaining unidentified to species level. In both regions the sections identified were the same but in 28S rDNA identified some isolates identified as A. niger using ITS region into other species like A. luchuensis, and A. costaricensis.
Section Nigri species dominated the study cashew samples with A. niger being the predominant fungal contaminant. The Aspergillus species that were recovered in the cashew nuts includes A. niger, A. tubingensis, A. aculeatus, A. luchuensis, A. costaricensis, A. flavus, A. parasiticus, and A. terreus. The strains belong to three sections, the Aspergillus section Flavi, Aspergillus section Nigri and Aspergillus section Terrei. Identification of A. aculeatus using calmodulin gene specific primers may have been due misidentification using primers as previously been reported by [51] and/or as a result of the presence of the aflatoxin producing gene clusters in Aspergilli section Nigri, which are non-functional [52]. The section Nigri species were the most abundant followed by the section Flavi, and A. niger and its strains were more predominant. The results are in consonance with the findings of [46] on cashew nuts in Benin which also suggested that species from Aspergillus section Nigri (black Aspergilli) are among the most prevalent fungi that cause food spoilage and bio-deterioration of the nutrients in cashews and other nuts. Their potential to produce mycotoxins such as ochratoxins offers an additional risk to food safety [46]. However, the contributions of black Aspergilli to the fermentation industry, from production of organic acids and hydrolytic enzymes, make them of biotechnological significance [53]. For instance, A. luchuensis is widely utilized in Japan and China to produce koji, which is used in beverage fermentation [53]. Despite the capacity of A. niger to synthesize mycotoxins, it has made important contributions to industry and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has classed products derived from this species as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) [8].
In the section Flavi species identified, A. flavus was most abundant. The results supports previous findings in cashew nuts in Nigeria by [54], groundnuts in Uganda [55], and in rice in Kenya [27]. Species of the Aspergillus section Flavi recovered from our cashew nuts samples were mostly A. flavus and A. parasiticus, which are the major aflatoxigenic species in cashew nuts [6, 46]. Another aflatoxigenic species, A. nomius, was not isolated from cashew nuts in the current study although it has been recovered from cashew nuts in South Africa [54]. In the section Terrei, A. terreus was identified. The results corroborate the findings reported in cashew nuts in Nigeria by [54]. A. terreus is well known for producing lovastatin, a cholesterol-lowering agent and other secondary metabolites such as territram, butyrolactones, and acetylaranotin with interesting bioactivities [56]. The gene cluster involved in aflatoxin production, which consists of the genes AflR, AflS, AflP, AflD, AflM, and AflO, regulates the capacity of fungal species to generate aflatoxins [56].
Any alteration in the sequences of the gene clusters involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis or the regulatory genes through insertions and deletions may cause Aspergillus isolates prone to aflatoxin production to become non-aflatoxigenic [57]. The isolates that showed amplification of the three selected genes were recorded as potentially aflatoxigenic. The use of the AflD, AflM and AflR genes was based on the key role they play in the biosynthesis of aflatoxins. The isolates that were not amplified by the selected genes were classified non-aflatoxigenic [58]. The non-aflatoxigenic nature could be due to the absence of the genes or major mutations within the regions flanking the genes or the genes regions that inhibit the aflatoxin production [59].
After screening for the presence aflatoxins in the potentially aflatoxigenic isolates, only isolates of the Aspergillus section Flavi were identified as aflatoxigenic. The species that were aflatoxigenic were A. flavus and A. novoparasiticus (n = 13) and one was identified as Aspergillus sp. From our study, the presence of the aflatoxin pathway genes was not consistent with the aflatoxin production of the isolates. The most predominant aflatoxin producers were A. flavus. The results agree with previous findings that A. flavus was the most abundant aflatoxigenic species in rice [27], maize [60] and peanuts [30, 58]. The study reports that the recovery of the aflatoxin-producing Aspergillus species can be associated with their ubiquitous nature and the potential of generating large numbers of spores that remain viable even in harsh environments [21]. In the current study, the contamination was attributed to the exposure of raw cashew nuts to fungal colonization during the harvesting period or post-harvest. Due to the toxic, teratogenic, and carcinogenic aflatoxins, there is need for assessment, detection, and quantification of the mycotoxin at each stage of cashew nuts processing.
Aspergillus species genetic diversity analysis in the cashew nuts is vital because it aids in the understanding of their local distributions. The diversity of both the ITS region and the 28S rDNA nucleotide sequences of the Aspergillus isolates recovered from our samples was estimated as they are known among the major mycotoxin producers in cashew nuts [32]. The phylogenetic analyses of both regions showed a similar distribution of the isolates into three clades. All the species of Aspergillus section Flavi clustered together while Aspergillus section Nigri species formed two clades regardless of the locality of the isolates. Results of the AMOVA demonstrated that the genetic variation within the populations was responsible for the genetic differences as compared to the variation among the populations both using 28S rDNA and ITS. The high genetic diversity in the Aspergillus isolates within the populations could be due to the farming practices in the different fields where the cashew nuts were collected from. Similar findings were also observed in Aspergillus species on groundnuts in Uganda by [55]. The study results also suggest a low genetic diversity among the three populations of Aspergillus isolates. This could have resulted from gene flow among the isolates in the different counties by the human activities causing the Aspergillus isolates contamination of the cashew nuts post-harvest. Secondly, the low genetic diversity could be due to the adaptation of the Aspergillus isolates to survive in adverse environments by the means of differential competition. The adaptation will make them to thrive together in similar climatic regions. Moreover, it could be an indication that most of the isolates shared similar insertions and deletions in both the ITS region and 28S rDNA sequences.

Conclusions

Overall, results from the current study showed that raw cashew nuts collected from coastal Kenya had low and acceptable moisture content. However, fungi of the Aspergillus sections Nigri and Flavi were isolated as contaminants. The presence of isolates from section Flavi signified that there was contamination of the cashew kernels by aflatoxins. Additionally, the presence of section Nigri isolates could indicate the potential presence of other mycotoxins such as ochratoxins. Specific genes from the aflatoxin pathway found in all section Flavi isolates and the production of aflatoxins from then showed the cashew nuts could probably be contaminated with aflatoxins that render the products unsafe for food and feed. This call of the need to quantify the level of aflatoxins contamination in the cashew nuts. The genetic diversity of A. flavus and other fungi in various regions provides a valuable gene pool for potential for application in biocontrol to reduce the prevalence of aflatoxigenic fungi in the region through competitive exclusion mechanisms. Additionally, the identified aflatoxigenic A. flavus strains could be exploited to investigate the resistance of Aspergillus species colonization and resultant aflatoxins and other mycotoxins production in different crop varieties grown in the region during breeding programmes. Further studies could investigate how and the conditions under which these cashew nut products are processed and whether due diligence is taken when preparing the raw materials for processing. This study calls for interventions including awareness creation, timely harvesting, rapid nut drying, appropriate storage facilities, sorting, and processing, insect control at pre-and post-harvest stages to reduce the incidences of aflatoxins contamination.
    
This article was originally published in PLoS ONE19(1): e0292519. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0292519. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.

1. Wagaki M. Kenyan government moves to revive cashew nuts sector. PanAfrican Agriculture. 2020. https://panagrimedia.com/kenyan-government-moves-to-revive-cashew-nuts-sector/

2. Dendena B, Corsi S. Cashew, from seed to market: A review. ASD. 2014. 34(4), 753–772.

3. Gyedu-Akoto E. Assessment of post-harvest handling effects on quality of cashew nuts and kernels in Ghana. J. Sci. Res. 2014. 3(7), 953–965. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2014/8242

4. Medina A, Akbar A, Baazeem A, Rodriguez A, Magan N. Climate change, food security and mycotoxins: Do we know enough? Fungal Biol. Rev. 2017. 31(3), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2017.04.002

5. Sombie JI, Ezekiel CN, Sulyok M, Ayeni KI, Jonsyn-Ellis F, Krska R. Survey of roasted street-vended nuts in Sierra Leone for toxic metabolites of fungal origin. Food Addit. Contam: Part A. 2018. 35(8), 1573–1580. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2018.1475753 PMID: 29787353

6. Adetunji MC, Alika OP, Awa NP, Atanda OO, Mwanza M. Microbiological quality and risk assessment for aflatoxins in groundnuts and roasted cashew nuts meant for human consumption. J. Toxicol. 2018, 748–759. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1308748 PMID: 30046306

7. Adebajo LO, Diyaolu SA. Mycology and spoilage of retail cashew nuts. AJB. 2003; 2(10):369–73.

8. Perrone G, Ferrara M, Medina A, Pascale M, Magan N. Toxigenic fungi and mycotoxins in a climate change scenario: Ecology, genomics, distribution, prediction and prevention of the risk. Microorganisms. 2020 Sep 29; 8(10): 1496. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8101496 PMID: 33003323

9. Kabak B, Dobson AD, Var II. Strategies to prevent mycotoxin contamination of food and animal feed: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2006 Dec 1; 46(8):593–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10408390500436185 PMID: 17092826

10. Probst C, Schulthess F, Cotty PJ. Impact of Aspergillus section Flavi community structure on the development of lethal levels of aflatoxins in Kenyan maize (Zea mays). J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010 Feb 1; 108 (2):600–10.

11. Alsuhaibani AM. Effects of storage periods and temperature on mold prevalence and aflatoxin contamination in nuts. Pak J Nutr. 2018 Apr 15; 17(5):219–27.https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2018.219.227

12. Tai B, Chang J, Liu Y, Xing F. Recent progress of the effect of environmental factors on Aspergillus flavus growth and aflatoxins production on foods. Food Qual. Saf. 2020 Mar; 4(1):21–8.

13. Kachapulula PW, Akello J, Bandyopadhyay R, Cotty PJ. Aspergillus section Flavi community structure in Zambia influences aflatoxin contamination of maize and groundnut. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017 Nov 16; 261:49–56.

14. Yunes NB, Oliveira RC, Reis TA, Baquião AC, Rocha LO, Correa B. Effect of temperature on growth, gene expression, and aflatoxin production by Aspergillus nomius isolated from Brazil nuts. Mycotoxin Res. 2020 May; 36:173–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12550-019-00380-w PMID: 31828531

15. Benkerroum N. Aflatoxins: Producing-molds, structure, health issues and incidence in Southeast Asian and Sub-Saharan African countries. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020 Feb; 17(4):1215. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041215 PMID: 32070028

16. Achaglinkame MA, Opoku N, Amagloh FK. Aflatoxin contamination in cereals and legumes to reconsider usage as complementary food ingredients for Ghanaian infants: A review. J. Nutr. Intermed. Metab. 2017 Dec 1; 10:1–7.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnim.2017.09.001

17. Singh P, Cotty PJ. Aflatoxin contamination of dried red chilies: Contrasts between the United States and Nigeria, two markets differing in regulation enforcement. Food control. 2017 Oct 1; 80:374–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.05.014

18. Cheraghali AM, Yazdanpanah H, Doraki N, Abouhossain G, Hassibi M, Ali-Abadi S, et al. Incidence of aflatoxins in Iran pistachio nuts. FCT. 2007 May 1; 45(5):812–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2006.10. 026 PMID: 17161513

19. Iheanacho HE, Njobeh PB, Dutton FM, Steenkamp PA, Steenkamp L, Mthombeni JQ, et al. Morphological and molecular identification of filamentous Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus isolated from compound feeds in South Africa. Food Microbiol. 2014 Dec 1; 44:180–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. fm.2014.05.019

20. Mousavi B, Hedayati MT, Hedayati N, Ilkit M, Syedmousavi S. Aspergillus species in indoor environments and their possible occupational and public health hazards. Curr. Med. Mycol. 2016 Mar; 2(1):36.

21. Norlia M, Jinap S, Nor-Khaizura MA, Radu S, Samsudin NI, Azri FA. Aspergillus section Flavi and aflatoxins: Occurrence, detection, and identification in raw peanuts and peanut-based products along the supply chain. Front. Microbiol. 2019 Nov 22; 10:2602. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02602

22. Gourama H, Bullerman LB. Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus: Aflatoxigenic fungi of concern in foods and feeds: A review. J.Food Prot. 1995 Dec 1; 58(12):1395–404. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362- 028X-58.12.1395

23. Monson MS, Coulombe RA, Reed KM. Aflatoxicosis: Lessons from toxicity and responses to aflatoxin B1 in poultry. Agriculture. 2015 Sep 8; 5(3):742–77. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture5030742

24. Frisvad JC, Hubka V, Ezekiel CN, Hong SB, Novßkovß A, Chen AJ, et al. Taxonomy of Aspergillus section Flavi and their production of aflatoxins, ochratoxins and other mycotoxins. Stud. Mycol. 2019 Jun 1; 93(1):1–63.

25. Pildain MB, Frisvad JC, Vaamonde G, Cabral D, Varga J, Samson RA. Two novel aflatoxin-producing Aspergillus species from Argentinean peanuts. Int. J. Syst. Evol. 2008 Mar; 58(3):725–35. https://doi. org/10.1099/ijs.0.65123-0

26. Thathana MG, Murage H, Abia AL, Pillay M. Morphological characterization and determination of aflatoxin-production potentials of Aspergillus flavus isolated from maize and soil in Kenya. Agriculture. 2017 Sep 21; 7(10):80. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7100080

27. Douksouna Y, Masanga J, Nyerere A, Runo S, Ambang Z. Towards managing and controlling aflatoxin producers within Aspergillus species in infested rice grains collected from local markets in Kenya. Toxins. 2019 Sep 19; 11(9):544. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11090544

28. Kitya D, Bbosa GS, Mulogo E. Aflatoxin levels in common foods of South Western Uganda: a risk factor to hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur.J. Cancer. 2010 Jul; 19(4):516–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2354.2009.01087.x PMID: 20030698

29. Jubeen F, Sher F, Hazafa A, Zafar F, Ameen M, Rasheed T. Evaluation and detoxification of aflatoxins in ground and tree nuts using food grade organic acids. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020 Oct 1; 29:101749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101749

30. Yabe K, Yushita M, Yamamoto Y, Kushiro M. Detection of aflatoxigenic fungi in imported raw nuts using the dichlorvos-ammonia (DV-AM) method. JSM Mycotoxins. 2020 Jan 31; 70(1):7–13. https://doi.org/ 10.2520/myco.70-1-2

31. Palacio Flangini AD, Pan D. Occurrence and toxigenic potential of Aspergillus section Flavi on wheat and sorghum silages in Uruguay. Mycology, 2020, 11 (2): 147–157. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s13593-014-0240-7

32. Lamboni Y, Frisvad JC, Hell K, Linnemann AR, Nout RM, Tamo M, et al. Occurrence of Aspergillus section Flavi and section Nigri and aflatoxins in raw cashew kernels (Anacardium occidentale L.) from Benin. LWT. 2016 Jul 1; 70:71–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.02.017

33. Gieseker KE, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outbreak of aflatoxin poisoning-eastern and central provinces, Kenya, January-July 2004.

34. Mehl HL, Jaime R, Callicott KA, Probst C, Garber NP, Ortega-Beltran A, et al. Aspergillus flavus diversity on crops and in the environment can be exploited to reduce aflatoxin exposure and improve health. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2012 Dec; 1273(1):7–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06800.x

35. Lance PM, Hattori A. Sampling and evaluation, a guide to sampling for program impact evaluation. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: MEASURE Evaluation, University of North Carolina. 2016.

36. Ojolo SJ, Damisa O, Orisaleye JI, Ogbonnaya C. Design and development of cashew nut shelling machine. J. Eng. Des. 2010 Jul 13; 8(2):146–57.

37. Pitt JI, Hocking AD. Fungi and food spoilage. New York: Springer; 2009 Jul 25.

38. Smith NR, Dawson VT. The bacteriostatic action of rose bengal in media used for plate counts of soil fungi. Soil Sci. 1944 Dec 1; 58(6):467–72.

39. Nyongesa BW, Okoth S, Ayugi V. Identification key for Aspergillus species isolated from maize and soil of Nandi County, Kenya. J. adv. microbiol. 2015 Apr 1; 5(04):205–229.

40. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee SJ, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. 1990 Jan 1; 18(1):315–322.

41. Al-Ouqaili MT. Depending on HPLC and PCR, detection of aflatoxin B1 extracted from Aspergillus flavus strains and its cytotoxic effect on AFB treated-hematopoietic stem cells obtained from human umbilical cord. AJP. 2018 Nov 6; 12(03).

42. Pallavi RM, Ramana D, Sashidhar RB. A simple test tube screening method for identifying aflatoxin-producing strains of Aspergillus sp. using coconut milk agar medium. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997 Nov; 13:713–4. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018539509273

43. Ahmed MZ, Alqahtani AS, Nasr FA, Rehman MT, Alsufyani SA, AlAjmi MF, et al. Detection and isolation of aflatoxin producing Aspergillus sp. in chewing and smokeless tobacco by microbial and molecular methods. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2023 Jun 15:103704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2023.103704

44. Yu G, Smith DK, Zhu H, Guan Y, Lam TT. ggtree: an R package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2017 Jan; 8(1):28– 36. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpbi.96

45. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinform. Online. 2005; 1(4):47–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/117693430500100003

46. Lamboni Y, Nielsen KF, Linnemann AR, Gezgin Y, Hell K, Nout MJ, et al. Diversity in secondary metabolites including mycotoxins from strains of Aspergillus section Nigri isolated from raw cashew nuts from Benin, West Africa. PLoS One. 2016 Oct 21; 11(10):e0164310. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0164310

47. Ogunsina BS, Bamgboye AI. Effect of moisture content, Nut size and hot-oil roasting time on the whole kernel “Out-Turn” of Cashew Nuts (Anacardium occidentale) during shelling. Niger. Food J. 2012 Jan 1; 30(2):57–65.

48. Azam-Ali SH, Judge EC. Small-scale cashew nut processing. Coventry (UK): ITDG Schumacher Centre for Technology and Development Bourton on Dunsmore. 2001:1–70. http://www.anacardium.info/IMG/ pdf/Small-scale_Cashew_Nut_Processing_-_FAO_2001.pdf

49. Okayo RO, Andika DO, Dida MM, K’Otuto GO, Gichimu BM. Morphological and molecular characterization of toxigenic Aspergillus flavus from groundnut kernels in Kenya. Int. J. Microbiol. 2020 Sep 7;2020.

50. Tekpinar AD, Kalmer A. Utility of various molecular markers in fungal identification and phylogeny. Nova Hedwigia. 2019 Aug 17; 109(1–2):187–224. https://doi.org/10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2019/0528

51. Okoth S, De Boevre M, Vidal A, Diana Di Mavungu J, Landschoot S, Kyallo M, et al. Genetic and toxigenic variability within Aspergillus flavus population isolated from maize in two diverse environments in Kenya. Front. Microbiol. 2018 Jan 26; 9:57.

52. Susca A, Proctor RH, Mule G, Stea G, Ritieni A, Logrieco A, et al. Correlation of mycotoxin fumonisin B2 production and presence of the fumonisin biosynthetic gene fum8 in Aspergillus niger from grape. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010 Aug 25; 58(16):9266–72.

53. Hong SB, Yamada O, Samson RA. Taxonomic re-evaluation of black koji molds. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014 Jan; 98:555–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5332-9 PMID: 24281756

54. Adetunji MC, Ngoma L, Atanda OO, Mwanza M. A polyphasic method for the identification of aflatoxigenic Aspergilli from cashew nuts. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019 Jan; 35:1–5. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11274-018-2575-8 PMID: 30607686

55. Acur A, Arias RS, Odongo S, Tuhaise S, Ssekandi J, Adriko J, et al. Genetic diversity of aflatoxin-producing Aspergillus flavus isolated from selected groundnut growing agro-ecological zones of Uganda. BMC microbiology. 2020 Dec; 20(1):1–2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01924-2

56. Guo CJ, Wang CC. Recent advances in genome mining of secondary metabolites in Aspergillus terreus. Front. Microbiol. 2014 Dec 23; 5:717. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00717

57. Adhikari BN, Bandyopadhyay R, Cotty PJ. Degeneration of aflatoxin gene clusters in Aspergillus flavus from Africa and North America. Amb Express. 2016 Dec; 6(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016- 0228-6

58. Hussain A, Afzal A, Irfan M, Malik KA. Molecular detection of aflatoxin producing strains of Aspergillus flavus from peanut (Arachis hypogaea). TURJAF. 2015 Feb 10; 3(5):335–41. https://doi.org/10.24925/ turjaf.v3i5.335-341.123

59. Houshyarfard M, Rouhani H, Falahati-Rastegar M, Malekzadeh-Shafaroudi S, Mehdikhani-Moghaddam E, Chang PK. Gene deletion patterns in non-aflatoxigenic isolates of Aspergillus flavus. Mycologia Iranica. 2014 Dec 1; 1(2):87–97.

60. Okoth S, Nyongesa B, Ayugi V, Kang’ethe E, Korhonen H, Joutsjoki V. Toxigenic potential of Aspergillus species occurring on maize kernels from two agro-ecological zones in Kenya. Toxins. 2012 Oct 25; 4(11):991–1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins4110991

Related topics:
Recommend
Comment
Share
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Mycotoxins
Don Giesting
Don Giesting
Cargill
Biz Dev Mgr/Cargill
United States
Bart Dunsford
Bart Dunsford
DSM-Firmenich
United States
Enrique Angulo Cedeño
Enrique Angulo Cedeño
MSD - Merck Animal Health
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.