Animals provide the main source of dietary protein worldwide. The value of feed additives including antibiotic alternatives has become more apparent as the sustainability of the livestock industry is challenged due to the rampant use of in-feed antibiotics to maintain animal health and performance. The key drivers for the growth of the animal feed additive market are 1) increasing meat and milk products consumption, 2) antibiotics bans or restrictions, 3) favourable regulatory norms (e.g., carbon neutral), and 4) increasing livestock disease outbreaks. Regulatory actions to reduce or eliminate the use of antibiotics in livestock feeds are being considered in Canada and worldwide. However, withdrawal of antibiotics from feeds can result in several challenges including compromised animal health and performance. So far, we do not have a single “magic bullet” that can replace in-feed antibiotics. An integrated approach should be taken, including supplementation with antibiotic alternatives, and measures related to nutrition, biosecurity, and management. Different types of feed additives (e.g., organic acid, essential oils, enzymes, organic minerals, and probiotics) have been widely recognized as promising alternatives to antibiotics in feeds. Minimizing mycotoxin contamination in feeds is also an important component in maintaining animal health and performance in the post-antibiotic world. Chemical approaches, such as the use of sodium metabisulfite, and biological approaches, such as the use of microorganisms for detoxification, have shown promise in reducing vomitoxin. In summary, feed additives have significantly impacted the animal production industry by improving feed utilization efficiency and performance and minimizing the use of in-feed antibiotics.
Keywords: feed additives, mycotoxins, gut health, performance, post-antibiotic world
Choi, J., L. Wang, E. Ammeter, L. Lahaye, S. Liu, C.M. Nyachoti, and C. Yang. 2020. Evaluation of lipid matrix microparticles for intestinal delivery of essential oils in weaned pigs. Transl. Anim. Sci. 4(1):411-422.
Dänicke, S., A.K. Hegewald, S. Kahlert, J. Kluess, H.J. Rothkotter, G. Breves, and S. Doll. 2010. Studies on the toxicity of deoxynivalenol (DON), sodium metabisulfite, DON-sulfonate (DONS) and de epoxy-DON for porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells and the intestinal porcine epithelial cell lines IPEC-1 and IPEC-J2, and on effects of DON and DONS on piglets. Food Chem. Toxicol. 48(8-9):2154–2162.
Dänicke, S., S. Kersten, H. Valenta, and G. Breves. 2012. Inactivation of deoxynivalenolcontaminated cereal grains with sodium metabisulfite: a review of procedures and toxicological aspects. Mycotoxin Res. 28(4):199–218.
He, L., X. Zhao, J. Li, and C. Yang. 2022. Post-weaning diarrhea and use of feedstuffs in pigs. Anim. Front. 12(6):41-52.
Mwaniki, A.W., Q.R. Buis, D. Trott, L.A. Huber, C. Yang, and E.G. Kiarie. 2021. Comparative efficacy of commercially available deoxynivalenol (DON) detoxifying feed additives on growth performance, total tract digestibility of components and physiological responses in nursery pigs fed diets formulated with naturally contaminated corn. Transl. Anim. Sci. 5(2):txab050.
Omonijo, F.A., L. Ni, J. Gong, Q. Wang, L. Lahaye, and C. Yang. 2018. Essential oils as alternatives to antibiotics in swine production. Anim. Nutr. 4:126-136.
Selle, P.H., S.Y. Liu, J. Cai, R.A. Caldwell, and A.J. Cowieson. 2013. Preliminary assessment of including a reducing agent (sodium metabisulphite) in ‘all-sorghum’diets for broiler chickens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 186(1-2):81-90.
Tan, Z., S.M. Chekabab, H. Yu, X. Yin, M.S. Diarra, C. Yang, and J. Gong. 2019. Growth and virulence of Salmonella Typhimurium mutants deficient in iron uptake. ACS Omega. 4:13218- 13230.
Tan, Z., P. Lu, D. Adewole, M.S. Diarra, J. Gong, and C. Yang. 2021. Iron requirement in the infection of Salmonella and its relevance to poultry health. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 3(1):30:100101.
Truong, H.H., D.J. Cadogan, S.Y. Liu, and P.H. Selle. 2016. Addition of sodium metabisulfite and microbial phytase, individually and in combination, to a sorghum-based diet for broiler chickens from 7 to 28 days post-hatch. Anim. Prod. Sci. 56(9):1484–1491.
Van Boeckel T.P., C. Brower, M. Gilbert, B.T. Grenfell, S.A. Levin, T.P. Robinson, A. Teillant, and R. Laxminarayan. 2015. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112:5649-5654.
Yang, C., M.Q. Rehman, X.H. Yin, C.D. Carrilloc, Q. Wang, C. Yang, J. Gong, and M.S. Diarra. 2021a. Antimicrobial resistance phenotype and genotype of generic Escherichia coli from encapsulated cinnamaldehyde and citral fed-broiler chicken. J. Food Prot. 84(8):1385-1399.
Yang, C., M.S. Diarra, J. Choi, A. Rodas-Gonzalez, D. Lepp, S. Liu, P. Lu, M. Mogire, J. Gong, Q. Wang, and C. Yang. 2021b. Effects of encapsulated cinnamaldehyde on growth performance, intestinal digestive and absorptive functions, meat quality and gut microbiota in broiler chickens. Transl. Anim. Sci. 5(3):txab099.
Yang, C., J. Gong, Y. Kennes, D. Lepp, X. Yin, Q. Wang, H. Yu, C. Yang, and M. Diarra. 2020. Effects of encapsulated cinnamaldehyde and citral on the performance and cecal microbiota of broilers vaccinated or not vaccinated against coccidiosis. Poult. Sci. 99(2):936-948.
Yang, Y., S. Cui, J. Gong, S.S. Miller, Q. Wang, and Y. Hua. 2015. Stability of citral in oil-inwater emulsions protected by a soy protein-polysaccharide Maillard reaction product. Food Res. Int. 69:357-363.
Yang, Y., Q. Wang, M.S. Diarra, H. Yu, Y. Hua, and J. Gong. 2016. Functional assessment of encapsulated citral for controlling necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 95(4):780-789.
Yu, C., P. Lu, S. Liu, Q. Li, E. Xu, J. Gong, S. Liu, and C. Yang. 2021. Efficiency of deoxynivalenol detoxification by microencapsulated sodium metabisulfite assessed via an in vitro bioassay based on intestinal porcine epithelial cells. ACS Omega. 6(12):8382-8393.