Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

The metabolizable energy and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in dry extruded-expelled soybean meal in comparison with solvent-extracted soybean meal fed to broiler chickens

Published: September 3, 2021
By: Bonjin Koo, Olumide Adeshakin and Charles Martin Nyachoti / Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
Summary

The thermal treatment during extrusion can inactivate antinutritional factors in soybeans. Expelling extraction leaves behind soybean meal with higher contents of oil than solvent extraction does. The combination of these processing techniques results in dry extruded-expelled soybean meal (DESBM). It is expected that the feeding value of DESBM is high for broiler chickens, making it important to determine the nutritive values of DESBM to be used in broiler diets in comparison with solvent-extracted soybean meal (solvent SBM). An experiment was conducted to determine the standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of amino acids (AA) and the apparent metabolizable energy (AMEn) contents of DESBM and solvent SBM. Two hundred and forty broiler chicks were divided into 40 groups of 6 birds balanced for body weight and fed 5 experimental diets in a completely randomized design (8 groups/diet) from age 14 to 21 d. Two basal diets were cornstarch-DESBM-based and cornstarch-solvent-SBM-based diet. A portion of cornstarch and SBM in each basal diet were replaced by 30% of DESBM for cornstarch-solvent-SBM basal diet and 30% of solvent-SBM for cornstarch-DESBM basal diet. A cornstarch-casein based diet was also included to estimate basal endogenous AA losses for determining the SID of the AA. From d 19 to 21, excreta samples were collected for AMEn determination. On d 21, the birds were euthanized, and the contents of the ileums were obtained for determination of AA digestibility. The AMEn contents of SBM were determined by the substitution method, whereas the SID of the AA in SBM were directly determined from each basal diet. All data were analyzed using the mixed procedure of SAS. The apparent total tract retention of energy in the DESBM fed to broilers was lower (P = 0.03) than that in the solvent SBM. However, no difference in AMEn contents was observed between the DESBM (2,390 kcal/kg) and solvent SBM (2,314 kcal/kg). The SID of the AA in the DESBM and solvent SBM ranged between 79.6%–95.6% and 87.45%–94.2%, respectively. The SID of Ile, Leu, Met Ala, Asp, Gly, Ser, and Tyr in the solvent-SBM were greater (P < 0.10) than those in the DESBM. The higher dietary fiber content in DESBM than that in solvent SBM may lead to lower SID of AA and energy digestibility in broilers. 

Key words: broiler chickens, dry extruded-expelled soybean meal, energy content, standardized ileal digestibility.

 

Published in the proceedings of the Animal Nutrition Conference of Canada 2020. For information on the event, past and future editions, check out https://animalnutritionconference.ca/.

Content from the event:
Related topics:
Authors:
Bonjin Koo
Martin Nyachoti
University of Manitoba
University of Manitoba
Recommend
Comment
Share
Martin Smith
Evonik Animal Nutrition
Evonik Animal Nutrition
12 de octubre de 2021
Dear Sirs, thank you for this paper. However, there are many pieces of information missing that make it difficult to make correct conclusions. First is a gross analysis of the two soya products, in particular the oil content, with its direct impact on AME evaluation. Next is an indication of either the anti-nutrient (trypsin inhibitor) levels in the two materials; or a measure of potential heat-damage (over processing) in the solvent extracted product. We have found direct correlations between these two processing indicators and the SID factors for amino acids, that are not related to CHO component of the soya (although I agree that better characterisation of this fraction is important). MPS
Recommend
Reply
Hernan Casanova
Global Extent
22 de mayo de 2023
Dear Sirs: Very interesting work. I agree with Mr. Smith that a more detailed characterization of both the DESBM and Solvent SBM would be of interest. We work in the DESBM business, and have some plants producing expellers with more than 8 % oil, whereas some are below 5 % using smaller presses with ring configuration, instead of bars. Also, some work with hight temperatures in the extruders (more than 145-150 degrees C) to ensure proper deactivation and produce a darker product, overcooked, and with low PDI. Same applies to SBMs, some plants overcook the meal to maximize solvent recovery, affecting the digestibility.
Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Animal Feed
Dave Cieslak
Dave Cieslak
Cargill
United States
Inge Knap
Inge Knap
dsm-Firmenich
Investigación
United States
Alex Corzo
Alex Corzo
Aviagen
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.