Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreak at Bageshwori Gaushala, Chitwan, Nepal

Published: December 10, 2021
By: Milan Kandel 1, Sachin Regmi 1, Bablu Thakur 1, Ramchandra Acharya 1 and Krishna Kaphle 2 / 1 Faculty of Animal Science, Veterinary Science and Fisheries, Agriculture and Forestry University, Bharatpur Metropolitan-15, Chitwan, Nepal; 2 Department of Theriogenology, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Tribhuvan University, Khairehani Municipality-1, Chitwan, Nepal.
1. Introduction
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), also called as Aptho fever, is highly contagious, acute, viral disease of cloven-hoofed animals. It is economically important viral disease in farm animals like cattle, buffalo, goat, sheep and pigs [1]. Wild ruminants like deer and antelope are also susceptible to this disease [2]. It has high morbidity but low mortality. Mortality is mostly seen in young animals. FMD is characterized by blister formation and erosion in and around mouth, on the teats and between hooves [3, 4]. Other symptoms are high fever, excessive foamy and stringy salivation and lameness. In chronic cases, it is characterized by anorexia, low conception rates, abortions, still birth and sore feet [5]. Both vertical and horizontal ways of transmission have been recorded. The direct contact with an infected animal is the commonest infection route, but the virus may spread by mechanical contamination of animal works stuffs such as worker clothes, fodder and feeding utensils. The incubation period of the disease varies from 3 d to 8 d but in some cases more than two weeks of window period have also been observed.
The etiological agent, FMD virus (FMDV; Aphthovirus, Picornaviridae), is non-enveloped, single stranded positive sense RNA virus. Seven different serotypes of FMDV identified are A, O, SAT1, SAT2, SAT3, Asia 1 and C. The vaccination against one serotype does not provide cross protection against other [6]. This makes the vaccination programme against FMD much challenging.
FMD is prevalent during all seasons and across all parts of Nepal with large majority of outbreaks caused by FMDV serotype O [7]. The distribution of FMDV serotypes responsible being O (82%), Asia 1 (15%) and A (3%). From April 2016 to July 2016, the FMD survey in the cattle herds in 23 different districts of Nepal by Veterinary Epidemiology Centre (VEC) figured out 61 (53%) out of 115 collected samples were classified in O serotype [8, 9]. In a country or region, the occurrence of the FMD endemic has long-term effects reducing animal productivity moreover, the restrictions on international trades. Although the FMD elicits a low mortality rate, considering 20% and 10% reduction rate in milk and meat productions respectively estimated economic loss for Nepal is about 66 million US dollars per year [10].
Bageshwori Gaushala (Yogi Narharinath Gau Sangarkchan Kendra) located at Bharatpur Metropolitan-1, Chitwan, Nepal has been centre of cow shelter since mid-1990s [11]. Outbreak was detected here in predominantly indigenous herd and the treatment followed as explained in this paper.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1 History
In a herd of cattle (Bos indicus) at Bageshwori Gaushala, Devghat area of Chitwan district, Nepal consisting of 25 milking cattle, 10 bulls, 62 heifers, 32 calves and 21 elderly cattle with no history of FMD
Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreak at Bageshwori Gaushala, Chitwan, Nepal - Image 1
Fig. 1 Excessive foamy salivation in a mother cow.
Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreak at Bageshwori Gaushala, Chitwan, Nepal - Image 2
Fig. 2 Erosion of epithelial tissue of oral mucosa.
Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreak at Bageshwori Gaushala, Chitwan, Nepal - Image 3
Fig. 3 Hoof of adult cattle showing myiasis after the rupture of vesicles.
Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreak at Bageshwori Gaushala, Chitwan, Nepal - Image 4
Fig. 4 Regeneration of epithelial tissue after treatment on the ninth day.
2.3 Progression of Disease
Initially few adult cows presented noticeable clinical signs and symptoms like off feed, drooling salivation and refuse to move thus were kept under surveillance. On the second day in addition haemorrhagic oral mucosa was noticed. Close inspection of foot on the third day revealed foot myiasis and animal showed partial lameness. Blister on mouth of such animal appeared and abortion of pregnant animal at its third trimester was also reported. Day by day intra-herd transmission was noticed and at the third day almost 20 animals presented characteristic signs and symptoms. Treatment was started from day four. Till the ninth day new cases were recorded from the farm. Deaths of eight infected calves were also recorded.
2.4 Findings of Laboratory Examination
Epithelial tissue of oral mucosa and blood from eight cattle including one lactating adult, four heifer and three calves were analyzed. The serological analysis revealed 100% samples were positive for antibody against the FMDV. One sample was identified as FMDV serotype O by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
3. Treatment and Discussion
After the confirmatory diagnosis, the farm was placed under quarantine and necessary measures were taken to prevent FMDV spread. Segregation of infected cattle from healthy ones was also done. The infected cattle milk was discarded even for its calf. The whole farm was disinfected using strong phenyl solution and citric acid at dose rate of 30 g/L of water. Tracing the outbreak both forward and backward was attempted. As the herd was kept free from any vaccination routines, that year six months prior haemorragic septicaemia and black quarter combined vaccine was administered as government agency could not risk unvaccinated herd close to commercial farms. The highway that transports live animals from the plains and India inland for commercial dairy also runs through their grazing land. Pattern of outbreaks in such transported herds and commercial farms around the district was kept in monitoring. The fear of emerging new lines of serotypes and real concern to understand the prevalent serotypes in Nepal [4] made reporting this outbreak even more important.
Treatment was initiated after 3 d of initial appearance of signs and symptoms. The severely affected cattle were administered 4-6 L of intravenous fluid (normal saline, dextrose normal saline, Ringers lactate) along with 5-10 mL of vitamin B-complex for 5 d depending upon bodyweight and level of dehydration. The cattle showing pyrexia were administered meloxicam-paracetamol combination 0.5 mg/kg body weight intramuscularly. The wounds on oral cavity were cleaned using 1% iodine solution and oral mucosa was painted with boro-glycerine. Aloe vera gel was also applied on the mucosal wounds of mouth after cleaning. Aloe vera gel helps to decrease the severity of inflammation, speeds wound contraction and epithelialization and decreased scar tissue size [12].
Hooves were cleaned using KMnO4 solution first and then 1% iodine solution. Maggots were removed manually after application of turpentine oil plug from the interdigital space of hooves.
Myiasis infection was treated using Negasunt® Dusting Powder Pfizer Limited as a maggotticide. Herbal based, Himax ointment (Terminalia arjuna extract, Family—Combretaceae) was applied topically on the hoof as a wound healing agent and fly repellent. T. arjuna has been widely used as medicinal plant because of its antibacterial and antiviral properties [13]. This plant also increases the wound contracting ability, epithelization period, tensile strength and regeneration of tissues at the wound area [14]. Orally Restobal® (M/s Ayurvet Limited) was administered for 5 d (50 mL b.i.d per animal). This herbal product act as a potent immunomodulator and anti-stressor [15, 16]. The affected herd responded well to supportive therapy. Re-epithelialization of ruptured oral mucosa and tongue surface was observed on the ninth day (Fig. 4). The workers of the farm were advised to keep the animals and shed clean and dry.
Such outbreaks can be prevented by administering quadrivalent vaccine (serotype O, A, C, Asia 1), introduced in 2010 in Nepal. The cattle can be administered with the first dose of vaccine against FMDV at the age of four months and above. The booster dose is administered one month after the first dose and subsequent doses once every six months. Control of FMD by ring vaccination may be carried out in a country with a completely susceptible livestock population. It involves the vaccination of all susceptible animals in a prescribed area around an outbreak and depends for its success on the rapidity by which diagnosis, typing the virus and vaccination are carried out.
4. Conclusions
In case of FMD outbreak, mortality is normally low in adult animals. However, morbidity is high, and the disease results in considerable economic losses due to reduced milk production and growth rates, as well as forced trade restrictions [17-20]. Thus FMD is economically important disease of cloven-footed animal. Since there is no specific treatment for viral disease like FMD, therefore symptomatic treatment and good hygiene is always recommended. Control of fever and dehydration and immunopotentiation is always necessary to speeds up the recovery. Serotype O was the most commonly detected in Nepal although serotypes A and Asia 1 have been also repeatedly detected, and these serotypes continue to circulate in neighboring India and Bangladesh [21-23]. Thus, vaccination of susceptible animals against FMD is a well-established strategy to prevent and combat the disease. Inadequate quarantine facilities, unknown status of disease in transported animals from within the country and from India also poses threats of disease outbreak. Thus, tracing the outbreak, it was found that recently important herd in another city of Pokhara showed similar characteristics of FMD outbreak. Likewise, the management of herds raised in intensive and semi intensive structure like this herd needs better management and vaccination strategy to manage diseases like FMD that have huge economic and welfare consequences.
    
This article was originally published in Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology A 8 (2018) 406-411. doi: 10.17265/2161-6256/2018.06.008. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

[1] Alexandersen, S., Zhang, Z., Donaldson, A., and Garland,
A. J. 2003. “The Pathogenesis and Diagnosis of
Foot-and-Mouth Disease.” Journal of Comparative
Pathology 129 (1): 1-36.
[2] Weaver, G. V., Domenech, J., Thiermann, A. R., and
Karesh, W. B. 2013. “Foot-and-Mouth Disease: A Look from the Wild Side.” Journal of Wildlife Diseases 49 (4):
759-85.
[3] Arzt, J., Baxt, B., Grubman, M. J., Jackson, T., Juleff, N.,
Rhyan, J., Rieder, E., Waters, R., and Rodriguez, L. L.
2011. “The Pathogenesis of Foot-and-Mouth Disease II:
Viral Pathways in Swine, Small Ruminants, and Wildlife;
Myotropism, Chronic Syndromes, and Molecular
Virus-Host Interactions.” Transboundary and Emerging
Diseases 58 (4): 305-26.
[4] Arzt, J., Juleff, N., Zhang, Z., and Rodriguez, L. L. 2011.
“The Pathogenesis of Foot-and-Mouth Disease I: Viral
Pathways in Cattle.” Transboundary and Emerging
Diseases 58 (4): 291-304.
[5] Ranjan, R., Biswal, J. K., Subramaniam, S., Singh, K. P.,
Stenfeldt, C., Rodriguez, L. L., and Arzt, J. 2016.
“Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus-Associated Abortion and
Vertical Transmission Following Acute Infection in
Cattle under Natural Conditions.” PLOS ONE 11 (12): e0167163. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167163.
[6] Jamal, S. M., and Belsham, G. J. 2013. “Foot-and-Mouth
Disease: Past, Present and Future.” Veterinary Research
44 (1): 116.
[7] Adhikari, G., Acharya, K. P., Upadhyay, M., Raut, R.,
Kaphle, K., Khanal, T., Bertram, M. R., Stenfeldt, C., and
Arzt, J. 2018. “Outbreak Investigations of
Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus in Nepal between 2010 and 2015 in the Context of Historical Serotype
Occurrence.” Vet. Med. Sci. 4 (4): 304-14.
[8] Veterinary Epidemiology Centre (VEC). 2016. “FMD
Newsletter Quarterly Bulletin.” VEC. http://epivet.gov.np/uploads/files/0292208658.pdf.
[9] Giri, R., Parshin, P., and Makarov, V. 2010.
“Epidemiology of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Nepal.” In
Proceedings of the 9th National Conference of Nepal
Veterinary Association, 22-4.
[10] Gongal, G. N. 2002. Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Nepal.
Technical report, National FMD Control Section,
Kathmandu, Nepal, issue 1-4, 19-22.
[11] Subedi, G., Pokhrel, Y., Osti, R., and Kaphle, K. 2017.
“History of Establishment of Bageshori Gaushala.” In
Bageshwori Sandesh. Shree Bageshwori Adhymtmik
Parishad, Yogi Narharinath Gau Sangrakchan Kendra,
Chitwan.
[12] Oryan, A., Mohammadalipour, A., Moshiri, A., and
Tabandeh, M. R. 2016. “Topical Application of Aloe vera
Accelerated Wound Healing, Modeling, and Remodeling:
An Experimental Study.” Annals of Plastic Surgery 77 (1): 37-46.
[13] Vishwakarma, A. P., Vishwe, A., Sahu, P., and
Chaurasiya, A. 2013. “Magical Remedies of Terminalia arjuna (Roxb.).” International Journal of Pharmaceutical
Archive 2 (8): 189-201.
[14] Mukherjee, P. K., Mukherjee, K., Kumar, M. R., Pal, M., and Saha, B. P. 2003. “Evaluation of Wound Healing
Activity of Some Herbal Formulations.” Phytotherapy
Research 17 (3): 265-8.
[15] Ambore, B., Ravikanth, K., Maini, S., and Rekhe, D. S.
2009. “Haematological Profile and Growth Performance of Goats under Transportation Stress.” Vet. World 2 (5):
195-8.
[16] Sivajothi, S., Reddy, Y. P., Reddy, B. S., Vani, S.,
Chandel, S., Ravikanth, K., and Ganguly, B. 2018.
“Evaluation of Herbal Anti-stressor Product (Restobal) during the Vaccination Stress in Buffaloes.” Int. J. Curr.
Microbiol. App. Sci 7 (7): 723-7.
[17] Yang, P. C., Chu, R. M., Chung, W. B., and Sung, H. T.
1999. “Epidemiological Characteristics and Financial
Costs of the 1997 Foot-and-Mouth Disease Epidemic in
Taiwan.” Veterinary Record 145 (25): 731-4.
[18] Bouma, A., Elbers, A. R. W., Dekker, A., de Koeijer, A.,
Bartels, C., Vellema, P., van der Wal, P., van Rooij, E.
M., Pluimers, F. H., and de Jong, M. C. 2003. “The
Foot-and-Mouth Disease Epidemic in the Netherlands in
2001.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 57 (3): 155-66.
[19] Junker, F., Ilicic-Komorowska, J., and van Tongeren, F.
2009. “Impact of Animal Disease Outbreaks and
Alternative Control Practices on Agricultural Markets and Trade: The Case of FMD.” OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 19, OECD Publishing. doi:
10.1787/221275827814.
[20] Knight-Jones, T. J. D., and Rushton, J. 2013. “The
Economic Impacts of Foot-and-Mouth Disease—What
Are They, How Big Are They and Where Do They
Occur?” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 112 (3-4):
161-73.
[21] Nandi, S. P., Rahman, M. Z., Momtaz, S., Sultana, M., and Hossain, M. A. 2015. “Emergence and Distribution of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Serotype A and O in
Bangladesh.” Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 62 (3): 328-31.
[22] Hegde, R., Gomes, A. R., Giridhar, P., Kowalli, S.,
Shivashankar, B. P., Sudharshana, K. J., Nagaraj, K.,
Sesharao, R., Mallinath, K. C., Shankar, B. P., Nagaraj,
D., Seema, C. M., Khan, T. A., Nagaraj, G. V., Srikala,
K., Dharanesh, N. K., Venkatesha, M. D., and
Renukaprasad, C. 2014. “Epidemiology of
Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Karnataka State, India: A
Retrospective Study.” Virus Disease 25 (4): 504-9.
[23] Islam, M. S., Habib, M. A., Saha, P. C., Das, P. M., and
Khan, M. A. H. N. A. 2017. “Distribution of
Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Serotypes in Cattle of
Bangladesh.” SAARC Journal of Agriculture 15 (1):
33-42.

Related topics:
Authors:
Dr Sachin Regmi
Recommend
Comment
Share
DR.MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE
15 de marzo de 2022
Interesting article for FMD treatment is interesting.I really appreciate
Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Dairy Cattle
Guillermo Schroeder
Guillermo Schroeder
Cargill
United States
Pietro Celi
Pietro Celi
dsm-Firmenich
dsm-Firmenich
United States
Mauricio Grierson
Mauricio Grierson
MSD - Merck Animal Health
MSD - Merck Animal Health
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.