Explore

Communities in English

Advertise on Engormix

About Copper Foothbaths for Dairy Cows

Published: September 13, 2012
Source : Ann Perry- USDA- Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
At least once a day, many of Idaho’s 550,000 dairy cows wade through shallow copper sulfate baths to help prevent foot infections. Producers often discard the bath water into lagoons and eventually use the spent wastewater to irrigate corn and alfalfa.
“At some point, the buildup of copper in the soil could start to negatively affect crop production,” says soil scientist Jim Ippolito, who works at the Agricultural Research Service’s Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research Laboratory in Kimberly, Idaho.

“By studying this issue now, we may be able to help producers develop irrigation management strategies that keep copper from getting to potentially harmful levels.” Ippolito joined with ARS soil scientist David Tarkalson and microbiologist Tom Ducey to study how copper levels in the wastewater affected crop performance and soil microbial activities. Tarkalson also works in Kimberly, and Ducey is with ARS’s Coastal Plains Soil, Water, and Plant Research Center in Florence, South Carolina.
The scientists selected two soils common to south-central Idaho, where many dairies are located. Then they conducted a lab study of alfalfa growth in soils containing copper at levels of 50 parts per million (ppm), 100 ppm, 250 ppm, 500 ppm, or 1,000 ppm.
Copper sulfate at soil levels of up to 250 ppm had no effect on alfalfa growth, but alfalfa growth stopped when soil copper sulfate levels exceeded 500 ppm. The alfalfa plants took up higher levels of copper at both application rates, and from 48 to 80 percent of the added copper was still in the soil and available to plants at the end of the study.
Many of Idaho’s dairy cows wade through copper sulfate baths like this to help prevent foot infections.
ARS scientists are studying how copper levels in the wastewater affect crop growth and soil microbes. 
The team also discovered that beneficial soil bacterial activity declined when the two soils accumulated available soil copper levels above 50 ppm. And a correlation analysis indicated that soil levels above 63 ppm of plant-available copper resulted in alfalfa copper concentrations that could potentially harm grazing livestock, according to guidelines established by the National Research Council.
Ippolito also conducted a laboratory study of whether biochar made from pecan shells could reduce copper levels in the spent wastewater. He tested the biochar in solutions with varying pH levels and found that the amount of copper adsorbed, or “captured,” by the biochar could be as much as 40,000 ppm. He concluded that it might be possible to use biochar to clean up waters containing elevated copper levels, but that more studies would be needed to identify characteristics that would allow the biochar to capture the most copper.
Ippolito published his findings in the Journal of Agricultural Science, Soil Science, and the Journal of Environmental Quality. “In our studies, we controlled how much copper was added to the soil. But in realworld conditions, soil copper accumulations and their effects will vary depending on a range of factors, including how often crops are irrigated, how much copper is in the wastewater, and how much copper remains in plant-available form,” Ippolito says.
“We might not see any negative impacts for anywhere from 15 to 75 years after irrigation begins. But producers should be proactive and work with us to address this issue sooner rather than later.”

This research is part of Climate Change, Soils, and Emissions (#212), Agricultural and Industrial Byproducts (#214), and Water Availability and Watershed Management (#211), three ARS national programs described at  www.nps.ars.usda.gov.
Jim Ippolito and David Tarkalson are with the USDA-ARS Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research Laboratory, 3793 N 3600 E, Kimberly, ID 83341-5076; (208) 423-6524 [Ippolito], (208) 423-6503 [Tarkalson], jim.ippolito@ars.usda.gov, david.tarkalson@ars.usda.gov. Tom Ducey is with the USDA-ARS Coastal Plains Soil, Water, and Plant Research Center, 2611 West Lucas St., Florence, SC 29501-1242; (843) 669-5203 ext. 112, thomas.ducey@ars.usda.gov.*
Acknowledgement
This article was originally published in the U.S Department of Agriculture´s science magazine, Agricultural Research, September 2012. Engormix.com thanks for this huge contribution. 
Source
Ann Perry- USDA- Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
Related topics:
Recommend
Comment
Share
Geest van Jan
Intracare
11 de abril de 2013

Copper sulphate and formaldehyde are raw materials which are used globaly, the negative influence on environment is huge, beside that formaldehyde is carcenogenic.
It's also proved that formaldehyde has no possitive influence on Digital dermatitus at all, copper sulphate is proven not to be effective, but had some influence, the main reason of using it was Cheap.
In Europe there are products which are proven to be effective . Investigation has proven that alternative products are more effective then antibiotic, or copper sulphate :
http://veterinaryrecord.bmj.com/content/169/21/555.full.pdf+html?sid=ff47a25d-18aa-4e27-8ec0-7b3665fbc9de

Recommend
Reply
peter smith
19 de enero de 2021
good job. the present moment needs to be creative. Sometimes you have to excel to be able to overcome today's constant difficulties.
Recommend
Reply
Johan Staal
Agriprom International S.R.L
9 de abril de 2013

I would discourage the use of copper sulphate. First of all experience teaches there is a tendency to overdose. Second the copper sulphate will not fully dissolve. In the Ntherlands the use of copper in footbaths is forbidden, because of environmental reasons.
If you are allowed to use copper, then look for liquid forms. There are mixtures of liquid copper and zinc containing products which are easy to use and at much lower dosages than the coppersulphate.

Recommend
Reply
Ram Prasad Poudyal
11 de octubre de 2012

Thanks for good information for soil hazzards on commercialization dairy industry.It should be study on consuming such type of grass by animals and effects on milk residues.

Recommend
Reply
Kourash Golzar
23 de septiembre de 2012

How much sulfate copper is needed for Foot bath for dairy cow and in what percentage?
Thank
Golzar
Dairy manager

Recommend
Reply
Hafiz Wasi Muhammad Khan
19 de septiembre de 2012
This is an important issue which needs to be addressed. I never thought of negative effects of copper concentration and its effect on future growth of alfalfa. The study is thought provoking and such studies must continue for the benefit of agriculture community
Recommend
Reply
Profile picture
Would you like to discuss another topic? Create a new post to engage with experts in the community.
Featured users in Dairy Cattle
Jim Quigley
Jim Quigley
Cargill
Technical Lead - Calf & Heifer at Cargill
United States
Pietro Celi
Pietro Celi
DSM-Firmenich
DSM-Firmenich
United States
Todd Bilby, Ph.D.
Todd Bilby, Ph.D.
MSD - Merck Animal Health
Dairy Technical Services Manager
United States
Join Engormix and be part of the largest agribusiness social network in the world.